Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

5/24/2023

VIETNAM OIL AND GAS GROUP


PETROVIETNAM UNIVERSITY

RESERVOIR PETROPHYSICS
Chapter 6
Geomechanical Properties

Lecturer : Do Quang Khanh


E-mail : khanhdq@pvu.edu.vn

Content

1.Overview: Introduction
2. Classification Parameters
3. Fundamental Geomechanica Properties and Processes
1. Stress and Strain
2. Fundamental Laboratory Techniques
3. Deformation Properties
4. Failure/Strength Properties
4. Correlation Between Static and Dynamic Moduli
5.Correlation Between Seismic Velocity and Strength
Properties
1.Some Experimental Results and Empirical
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Relationships
2. Model-Based Relationships
6. Some Remarks About Shale Brittleness

Geomechanical Properties 2
1
5/24/2023

7.1 Overview: Introduction

v Rock deformation and failure or strength behaviour are


important problems in geomechanics. Stress distribution and
rock properties control the corresponding processes.
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 3

7.1 Overview: Introduction

• Examples of geomechanical problems are:

-deformation and failure processes originated by tectonic stress,


earthquakes,
- landslides and rockfall,
-deformation of the underground (settlement) and subsurface
constructions (tunnel, cavern, mining) caused by the pressure of
construction in civil engineering
- slope and dam stability (failure problems),
- wellbore stability and fracturing,
-reservoir compaction during production and subsidence
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 4
2
5/24/2023

7.1 Overview: Introduction


Physical Properties of Rocks
The physical problem of geomechanical properties evaluation in terms of
geophysical parameters.

- Under the influence of a stress field rocks answer with

+ Deformation: Controlled by the elastic properties (Young’s modulus,


shear modulus, Poisson’s ratio)

+ Failure,: Controlled by the strength properties (uniaxial strength,


cohesion, and angle of internal friction)
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

+ Changes of measurable physical properties (elastic wave velocities)

Geomechanical Properties 5

7.1 Overview: Introduction

v There are two different types of response on a stress field:


(1)the geomechanical response (deformation and/or a failure),
(2)the geophysical response as change of the magnitude of a measured
parameter (for example velocity or resistivity)
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 6
3
5/24/2023

7.2 CLASSIFICATION PARAMETERS

A more complex rock quality parameter Q was defined by


Barton et al. (1974); see also Barton (2007):

-RQDs is the rock quality designation index,


- Ja is a parameter depending on degree of joint alteration and
clay filling,
- Jn is a parameter depending on the number of joint sets,
- Jr is a parameter depending on joint roughness,
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

-Jw is a parameter depending on amount of water inflow or


pressure,
- SRF is the stress reduction factor (e.g. due to faulting).

Geomechanical Properties 7

7.3. FUNDAMENTAL GEOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES AND PROCESSES

v Stress and Strain


v Fundamental Laboratory Techniques
v Deformation Properties
v Failure/Strength Properties
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 8
4
5/24/2023

Stress and Strain

v Stress as the force acting on a given area can have normal and shear
components
v Normal stress acts perpendicular to a plane, shear stress acts along the
face of the plane
v A rock under the influence of stress responds through various kinds of
deformation or strain
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 9

Stress and Strain

::J

e>:.

Q)
.<?.
c
::J
E
Cll
c
a;
>
e
a;
0...
I
v
0
N
@

Geomechanical Properties 10
5
5/24/2023

Stress and Strain

5
e:.

Q)
.<?.
c
:::)

E
Cll
c
a;
>
e
a;
0...
I
v
0
N
@

Geomechanical Properties 11

Fundamental Laboratory Techniques

v Rock mechanical properties in the laboratory are


determined in most cases at cylindrical samples by
observing the rock deformation (strain) under the influence
of a defined stress
v Two types of properties are determined:
-static elastic or deformation moduli
-strength properties
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 12
6
5/24/2023

Fundamental Laboratory Techniques

::J

e>:.

Q)
.<?.
c
::J
E
Cll
c
a;
>
e
a;
0...
I
v
0
N
@

Geomechanical Properties 13

Fundamental Laboratory Techniques


© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Gives some insights into the mechanical properties and


stress–strain curves.
The curves show deformation in axial and radial direction of
a cylindrical rock sample under the influence of axial stress

Geomechanical Properties 14
7
5/24/2023

Fundamental Laboratory Techniques

The figures lead also to the two groups of parameters


© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

characterizing mechanical properties:


(1) deformation properties
(2) strength properties

Geomechanical Properties 15

Deformation Properties

Deformation properties are derived from a static compression


test. Young’s modulus is defined as the ratio of an axial stress
and the resulting axial strain:

Poisson’s ratio is defined as the relative change of the


radius divided by the relative change of axial length in
stress direction:
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 16
8
5/24/2023

Deformation Properties

::J

e>:.

Q)
.<?.
c
::J
E
Cll
c
a;
>
e
a;
0...
I
v
0
N
@

Geomechanical Properties 17

Failure/Strength Properties

Strength characterizes the amount of applied stress at rock


failure—the stress condition may be compressive, tensile, or
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

shear and defines the different measures of rock strength.


Lockner 1995 published a systematic description of
the physical processes of rock failure that includes a
bibliography of papers.There are three fundamental modes
of a failure test shown

Geomechanical Properties 18
9
5/24/2023

7.4 CORRELATION BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC MODULI

v The two types of investigation—static rock mechanical tests and


dynamic (seismic or ultrasonic) measurements—deliver moduli, which
are called “static” (Estat) and “dynamic” (Edyn) moduli, respectively
v The modulus is independent on the duration of stress application only
for an ideal elastic material—there is no difference in the moduli from a
“long term” static and an extremely “short term” dynamic test

v => Edyn > Estat


© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 19

7.4 CORRELATION BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC MODULI

v For this discrepancy between the static and dynamic modulia couple of
mechanisms are responsible:
v - The magnitudes of stress and strain generated by ultrasonic or
seismic wave propagation are extremely small compared to stress and
strain associated with the static testing technique
v - During static deformation, nonelastic components also occur (for
example due to mobilization of microcracks and grain boundaries).
However,ultrasonic (and seismic) measurements are mainly affected
only by the elastic response.
v The major difference between the static and dynamic measurement is
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

the strain amplitude (Fjaer et al., 2008):

Geomechanical Properties 20
10
5/24/2023

7.5 Correlation Between Seismic Velocity and Strength


Properties

v Correlation between strength properties and seismic velocities within


a rock type is based on some dominant influences changing both
properties in a comparable direction:
+ Increasing fracturing or porosity decreases both properties.
+ Increasing cementation increases both properties.
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 21

7.5.1 Some Experimental Results and Empirical


Relationships

v McNally (1987) studied the correlation between the uniaxial


compression strength (142 samples) and the compressional wave
slowness (measured with a sonic log) of fine to medium-grained
sandstone.
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 22
11
5/24/2023

7.5.2 Model-Based Relationships

v Two model concepts shall be tested in order to explain both


correlation and scatter of strength versus velocity relations:
+The simple defect model (Section 6.8.4) preferred for fractured
rocks.
+The structured model (Section 6.8.7) preferred for porous rocks.
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 23

7.5.2 Model-Based Relationships

v In Section 6.8.4, a simple defect model for a fractured rock was


presented. It can be used for derivation of a relationship between
velocity and uniaxial compressive strength. Assuming that the strength of
a material is controlled by the material section without defects, for the
model the simple relation results.

where σ c,solid is the strength of the intact matrix material and D is the
defect parameter.
A comparison with Eq. (6.114) results in a relationship between
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

the strength and the square of the velocity:

Geomechanical Properties 24
12
5/24/2023

7.5.2 Model-Based Relationships

v The “structured model” was derived for elastic properties in Section


6.8.7. Strength properties of a sedimentary rock—particularly with a
granular structure—are controlled by the mechanical strength
behaviour at the grain–grain contact.
For this contact, Coulomb’s law can be applied:
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 25

7.5.2 Modael-Based Relationships

• Shear stress and normal stress are related to the contact plane
between the grains. Therefore, the two stresses can be expressed in
terms of stress components in the microsystem.
• Coulomb’s law for the microsystem is now (parameters a, b see
Section 6.8.7):
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 26
13
5/24/2023

7.5.2 Model-Based Relationships

v The application of the same model for velocity and strength


calculation offers the possibility for the derivation of relationships
between the two mechanical properties. Figure 7.28 shows an
example. Model calculation is:
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 27

7.6 Some Remarks About Shale Brittleness

v Deformation and strength can be critical for various stability


problems.
v Shale in general is of interest with respect to its mechanical
properties.
v Horsrud (2001) noted “shales have certain characteristic features
that make them difficult to handle correctly. The two most important
characteristics are low permeability and sensitivity to contacting
fluids”. Shales—also from the same geological unit—can have very
different properties as demonstrated in Table 7.8:
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

Geomechanical Properties 28
14
5/24/2023

7.6 Some Remarks About Shale Brittleness

>
e
a;
0...
I
v
0
N
@

Group 6 Geomechanical Properties 29

7.6 Some Remarks About Shale Brittleness

v The shale’s ability to fracture is of special interest Mechanical behaviour


of shale is important in hydraulic fracture stimulation.
v Brittle shale may be more easily fractured, opening flowpaths. Ductile
shales may require more proppants.Two types of criterion are used:
+ Criterion based on shale mineralogy: investigated Barnett shale and
noted that “most brittle section of Barnett shales have abundant quartz, the
least brittle have abundant clays.

+ Criterion based on Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio (derived from


elastic wave velocities and density): Grieser and Bray (2007), Rickman et
© 2014 – Petrovietnam University (PVU)

al. (2008), and Sondergeld et al. (2010) characterize shale with E>34.5 MPa
and s<0.25 as “brittle” and derived a plot for separation of the two types
(Fig. 7.29)

Geomechanical Properties 30
15
5/24/2023

7.6 Some Remarks About Shale Brittleness

::J

e>:.

Q)
.<?.
c
::J
E
Cll
c
a;
>
e
a;
0...
I
v
0
N
@

Geomechanical Properties 31

16

You might also like