Professional Documents
Culture Documents
True (See Diagram Below) - Each Price Increases by 15%, So That - Px/Py Is Unchanged
True (See Diagram Below) - Each Price Increases by 15%, So That - Px/Py Is Unchanged
Frank, chapter 3
1. The Acme Seed Company charges $2/lb for the first 10 lbs. you buy of marigold seeds each
week and $l/lb for every pound you buy thereafter. If your income is $100/wk, draw your budget
constraint for the composite good and marigold seeds.
2. Originally Px is $120 and Py is $80. True or false: If Px increases by $18 and Py increases by
$12, the new budget line will be shifted inward and parallel to the old budget line. Explain.
True (see diagram below). Each price increases by 15%, so that – Px/Py is unchanged.
3. Picabo, an aggressive skier, spends her entire income on skis and bindings. She wears out one
pair of skis for every pair of bindings she wears out.
4. For Alexi, coffee and tea are perfect substitutes: One cup of coffee is equivalent to one cup of
tea. Suppose Alexi has $90/mo to spend on these beverages, and coffee costs $0.90/cup while tea
costs $1.20/cup. Find Alexi's best affordable bundle of tea and coffee. How much could the price of
a cup of coffee rise without harming her standard of living?
Alexi's budget constraint is T = 75 - (3/4)C. Her perfect substitute preferences yield linear indifference
curves with slope equal to negative one, such as T = 75 - C and T = 100 - C. By cnsuming 90/0.90 = 100
cups of coffee each month, she reaches a higher indifference curve than consuming 90/1.20 = 75 cups of
tea (or any affordable mixture of coffee and tea). Thus Alexi buys 100 cups of coffee and no tea. Any
increase in the price of coffee would force Alexi to a lower indifference curve, and thus lower her
standard of living.
5. You have the option of renting a car on a daily basis for $40/day or on a weekly basis for
$200/wk. Draw your budget constraint for a budget of $360/trip.
a. Find your best affordable bundle if your travel preferences are such that you require exactly
$140 worth of other goods for each day of rental car consumption.
Your budget constraint is Y = 360 - 40C for 0 < C < 5 days of car rental (when you pay the daily rate),
constant at Y = 160 for 5 < C < 7 days of car rental (when you switch to the weekly rate and thus
additional days up to one week are free), and then Y = 160 - 40(C - 7) = 440 - 40C for 7 < C < 11 (when
again you have to pay by the day for each day beyond the one week). a) If y = 140C, then inserting this
equation into the first leg of the budget constraint yields 140C = 360 - 40C or 180C = 360, which solves
for C = 2 days of car rental and thus Y = 280 worth of other goods.
b. Alternatively, suppose you view a day of rental car consumption as a perfect substitute for $35
worth of other goods.
If instead you will trade a day of car rental for $35, then you would consume a week's rental C = 7 and
thus Y = 160 worth of other goods. Your seven days of car rental are equivalent to 7(35) = $245
according to your preferences, which when added to the $160 remaining, yields $405. This beats the $360
if you consume no rental days and also beats the 11(35) = $385 if you consume the maximum rental days
you can afford (as well as beating any other affordable combination of C and Y.