See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/355651385

COP-26: Make Nature-Based Solutions a Top Adaptation Priority

Article  in  Buildings and Cities · October 2021

CITATION READS
1 176

1 author:

Timon McPhearson
The New School
188 PUBLICATIONS   10,418 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Social media activity in parks View project

Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Timon McPhearson on 28 October 2021.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

COP-26: Make Nature-Based Solutions a Top Adaptation Priority - Commentaries 10/26/21, 7:36 AM

COP-26: Make Nature-Based Solutions a Top

Adaptation Priority
! October 26, 2021

By Timon McPhearson (The New

School, US)

Natural infrastructure is a critical

urban infrastructure that provides
fundamental and irreplaceable
services for human health, wellbeing,
and livelihoods. Urban development
must quickly shift away from the
dominant 20th century model that
exacerbates hazards and risks by
paving over urban ecological
infrastructure. Firm commitments at
COP-26 are needed to radically
The Cheonggyecheon Restoration Project in Seoul
increase investments in nature-based rejuvenated a river system that had been buried
solutions in cities: restoring, underground. This nature-based solution increased
conserving and investing in green and biodiversity, reduced urban heat island effects, improved
blue infrastructure assets. This will flood protection & created many social benefits.
reduce the impacts of climate change
as part of an adaptation strategy and also improve wellbeing.

The current and future urban climate risks demonstrate a pressing need for putting the same level
of global political will and economic investment in climate adaptation as there is in climate
mitigation. Current levels of adaptation are not enough, despite leadership and increasing resilience
and adaptation investments in both Global South and North cities. Global urban development must
quickly shift away from the dominant 20th century model that largely paves over urban ecological
infrastructure (Childers et al. 2019) creating urban heat islands, increasing flood risk, and placing
low-income, minorities, and indigenous people on the front lines of climate disasters.

Cities concentrate people, infrastructure, and economic activity, creating vulnerabilities and risks to
damaging impacts of climate change, extreme weather events, and other social and economic
shocks. Weather and climate related extreme events are already increasing and thus rapid
investments to shift current trajectories from vulnerable to resilient ones are paramount. Ambitious

https://www.buildingsandcities.org/inner.php/insights/commentaries/cop26-nature-based-solutions.html?print=1 Page 1 of 4
COP-26: Make Nature-Based Solutions a Top Adaptation Priority - Commentaries 10/26/21, 7:36 AM

urban climate change adaptation and resilience building efforts in the built-up areas most at risk will
mean the difference between moderate and severe social and economic consequences of near and
longer-term climate change.

With $90 trillion expected to be invested in infrastructure in the coming years to support
urbanization (IADB 2017), there is ample opportunity to transform urban development to both
celebrate and harness nature for climate resilience. Though traditional hard engineered strategies
will still be needed, we must harness the role of natural-based solutions to solve the climate crisis
(Hobbie and Grimm 2020; Keeler et al. 2019; Frantzeskaki and McPhearson 2021).

Nature-based solutions (NbS) is an umbrella term including ecosystem-based adaptation,

ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction, natural infrastructure, green and blue infrastructure, forest
and landscape restoration, and natural climate solutions. Nature-based approaches are already
being used in cities around the world to support climate change adaptation and resilience strategies
because they provide multiple benefits including for flood protection, air and water quality
regulation, and urban cooling while contributing to climate change mitigation and sustaining or
enhancing biodiversity (McPhearson et al. 2015). Indeed, a large part of the appeal of NbS is their
multifunctionality and potential to address multiple climate and urban wellbeing challenges
simultaneously (Frantzeskaki et al. 2019; Chausson et al. 2020).

Climate resilient development pathways must have NbS at their center because the biodiversity
crisis and climate crisis are fundamentally joined at the hip.We can’t solve the climate crisis
without nature, and we can’t rebuild, restore, and reconnect to nature if we don’t solve the climate
crisis that is already wreaking havoc on our natural systems.Both crises are human caused and both
require that we put nature-based solutions at the center of approaches to mitigate the multiple
causes of biodiversity decline and accelerating climate change.

Though investments in NBS implementation have increased in recent years, the scale of investment
needed is paltry compared to what is required to address the increasingly high stakes of climate
impacts in cities. According to the World Economic Forum’s Future of Nature and Business Report a
nature-positive pathway in the infrastructure and built environment could create over $3 trillion in
business opportunities and create 117 million jobs by 2030. The benefits are clear: NbS can
stimulate economic activity, advance climate mitigation and adaptation, and support biodiversity
protection. We can’t ignore the powerful ally we have in urban nature any longer.

At COP-26 is it vital that nations make firm agreements to radically scale up investments in NbS in
cities, and commit to restoring, conserving, and investing in green and blue infrastructure assets
that inclusively address the stark inequalities of the poor, minority and indigenous populations who

https://www.buildingsandcities.org/inner.php/insights/commentaries/cop26-nature-based-solutions.html?print=1 Page 2 of 4
COP-26: Make Nature-Based Solutions a Top Adaptation Priority - Commentaries 10/26/21, 7:36 AM

face the greatest burden of direct and indirect impacts of climate change. Though the rapid
mobilization of funding to respond to the current pandemic with announcements of nearly USD$20
trillion in spending to stimulate economies and help them recover is promising, only a small fraction
has to date been directed toward nature-based climate solutions (Rockstrom et al. 2021). NbS take
time to mature. Trees must grow, green roofs need to be built, wetlands need conserving and
restored. The time is now to rapidly and radically upscale NbS investments.

Investing in NbS implementation is key but we will need to invest in research to strengthen the
evidence base for NbS since we still lack necessary information to assess the efficacy of different
NbS in different urban contexts. This knowledge gap slows our ability to scale up and mainstream
NbS for reducing urban heat, absorbing stormwater, protecting coastlines, and improving public
health and mental health.

We must also co-create new governance mechanisms with local communities to make seats at the
table for local communities to bring their expertise and goals to decision-making for NbS
implementation. It is critical to ensure that investments to transform cities for adaptation and
carbon neutrality do not reinforce the status quo of legacies of racism, displacement, disinvestment
and lack of inclusion in decision-making that plague most of our cities (Spotswood et al. 2021).
Improving livelihoods in cities is not just about decreasing our carbon footprint and shifting
consumption patterns, it’s also about reducing and redressing the disproportionate impacts that
climate change and extreme weather events have on the poorest and most vulnerable.

Natural infrastructure is critical urban infrastructure that provides fundamental and irreplaceable
services for human health, wellbeing, and livelihoods and therefore must be a top priority at COP26.

NbS are the solutions we need that can deliver on climate adaptation, support climate mitigation,
and create space for biodiversity in cities at the same time.

References
Chausson, A., Turner, B., Seddon, D., Chabaneix, N., Girardin, C.A.J., Kapos, V., Key, I., Roe, D., Smith,
A., Woroniecki, S. & Seddon, N. (2020). Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for
climate change adaptation. Global Change Biology. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15310

Childers, D.L., Bois, P., Hartnett, H., McPhearson, T., Metson, G. & Sanchez, C.A. (2019). Urban
ecological infrastructure: an inclusive concept for the non-built urban environment. Elementa:
Science of the Anthropocene, 7(1): 46. doi: 10.1525/elementa.385

https://www.buildingsandcities.org/inner.php/insights/commentaries/cop26-nature-based-solutions.html?print=1 Page 3 of 4
COP-26: Make Nature-Based Solutions a Top Adaptation Priority - Commentaries 10/26/21, 7:36 AM

Frantzeskaki, N., & McPhearson, T. (2021). Mainstream nature-based solutions for urban climate
resilience. BioScience, biab105. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab105

Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., Collier, M., Kendal, D., Bulkeley, H., Dumitru, A., Walsh, C., Noble, K.,
van Wyk, E., Pinter, L., Ordonez, C., Oke, C., Elmqvist, T. (2019). Nature-based solutions for urban
climate change adaptation: linking the science, policy and practice communities for evidence-based
decision-making. Bioscience, 69, 455-566. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz042

Hobbie, S.E. & Grimm, N.B. (2020). Nature-based approaches to managing climate change impacts
in cities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0124

IADB. (2017). Crossing the bridge to sustainable infrastructure investing: exploring ways to make it
across. Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/en/crossing-bridge-
sustainable-infrastructure-investing-exploring-ways-make-it-across

Keeler, B.L., Hamel, P., McPhearson, T., Hamann, M., Donahue, M., Meza Prado, K., Arkema, K.,
Bratman, G., Brauman, K., Finlay, J. , Guerry, A., Hobbie, S. , Johnson, J., MacDonald, G., McDonald, R.,
Neverisky, N. & Wood, S. (2019). Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of
urban nature. Nature Sustainability, 2: 29-38.

McPhearson, T., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T. & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Resilience of and through
urban ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 12:152-156. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012

Rockström, J., Beringer, T., Hole, D., Griscom, B., Mascia, M.B., Folke, C. & Creutzig, F. (2021). We
need biosphere stewardship that protects carbon sinks and builds resilience. PNAS 118
(38);e2115218118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115218118

Spotswood, E. N., Benjamin, M., Stoneburner, L., Wheeler, M.M., Beller, E.E., Balk, D., McPhearson, T.,
Kuo, M., & McDonald, R.I. (2021). Nature inequity and higher COVID-19 case rates in less-green
neighbourhoods in the United States. Nature Sustainability, 1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00781-9

https://www.buildingsandcities.org/inner.php/insights/commentaries/cop26-nature-based-solutions.html?print=1 Page 4 of 4

View publication stats