Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Court of Common Pleas Franklin County, Ohio
Court of Common Pleas Franklin County, Ohio
Court of Common Pleas Franklin County, Ohio
____________________________
Adair Asset Management, LLC
405 N 115th St. STE 100
Omaha, NE 68154
Plaintiff
Thomas Fougere
1315 Hamlin Pl
Columbus, OH 43227 CASE NO. 22-CV-03-1780
On March 21st 2022, plaintiff Adair Asset Management was eligible to file suit for
the outstanding tax certificates in the amount of $3,487.45 and $2,294.19 which total
$5781.64.
In a conspiratorial action with the Franklin County Treasurer's Office they prepaid
taxes not yet due of $974.29 and allowed the certificate of $1304.76 to be included in
the suit. To further the extrinsic fraud that was occurring, Adair Asset Management
would not give a correct figure and relied on the fallacious figures provided by the
Because of the actions by US Bank in three separate instances, it is likely that they
played a part with conspiracy at the heart of it. Their refusal to reissue a check that
was more than likely stolen from the home of Thomas Fougere did not occur until
after the suit was filed. They did not offer to reissue this check until it was revealed to
them that all of the phone calls with their employees refusing to reveal the proper
department to reissue the check for months were recorded. It was only at the point of
A subsequent time before and after summary judgment was granted, once again
they attempted to block the defendant from accessing his own money and those phone
calls, hours of them are also recorded. Yesterday, Thomas Fougere was informed that
his account with US Bank was blocked from any transactions, and the balance made
completely unavailable.
These circumstances are not livable and nobody should have to go through them.
It's also become apparent that there has been a clandestine stalking/surveillance
operation that has been in effect for a significant amount of time. It consists of
multiple break-ins and theft of personal property and assets. There are constant noise
campaigns that are designed to instill a sense of the terror of being largely
extended to anybody and everybody that defendant Thomas Fougere has any kind of
interaction with. The most concerning is when he cannot maintain cell phone service
or internet service for a myriad of reasons unrelated to payment. The absolute worst
was the two and a half years of being denied medical attention by constantly having
appointments made and then canceled by the provider. It wasn't enough just to cancel
There have been multiple instances of Franklin County being caught in a lie and
they provided no affidavit for their assertions so summary judgment could not have
been granted based on their what they were trying to claim for payment because no
amount was being provided by the plaintiff. Therefore, this action should be dismissed
as was previously requested prior to the granting of the summary judgment motion.
Fraud upon the court was obvious and because it was a government agency putting
these figures forward and a court seemingly going along with it the malfeasance
amount actually due and wasting valuable time and effort where he would have
Lawyers and judges are officers of the court any fraudulent misrepresentations
they may make on a central matter in a legal dispute constitutes the perpetration
"Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court
machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging
cases that are presented for adjudication. Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968);
7Moore's Federal
Practice, 2d ed.,p. 512, ¶ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated "a decision
produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never
becomes final." What effect does an act of "fraud upon the court" have upon the
court proceeding?"Fraud upon the court" makes void the orders and
judgments of that court. TheU.S. Supreme Court has consistently
held that a void order is void at all times, does not have to be reversed or
vacated by a judge, can not be made valid by any judge, nor does it gain
validity by the passage of time. The order is void ab initio.
Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920).
“Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters,” Nudd v. Burrows
(1875), 91US 426, 23 Led 286,
Defendant has already remitted a check for $10,170.43 because there is no respect
for the rule of law here. A separate action will address what has gone on in federal
court.
proposed order be reversed and this matter dismissed as should have been prior to the
Respectfully Submitted,
Thomas Fougere
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing was electronically transmitted to the Clerk’s
Office using the electronic filing system, this 17th day of March, 2023. The following parties
will be notified electronically through the Court’s system:
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I mailed a copy of this document to the following people on April 22 2022 by regular first class
U.S. mail: