The document outlines a grading rubric for discussions with four critical elements: comprehension, engagement, critical thinking, and writing mechanics. Each element is scored on a scale and given a certain percentage of the total grade. Comprehension focuses on putting concepts in one's own words and using examples and references. Engagement requires adding substantive information and asking meaningful questions. Critical thinking is about drawing logical conclusions supported by evidence. Writing mechanics deals with clarity, conciseness, and grammatical errors.
The document outlines a grading rubric for discussions with four critical elements: comprehension, engagement, critical thinking, and writing mechanics. Each element is scored on a scale and given a certain percentage of the total grade. Comprehension focuses on putting concepts in one's own words and using examples and references. Engagement requires adding substantive information and asking meaningful questions. Critical thinking is about drawing logical conclusions supported by evidence. Writing mechanics deals with clarity, conciseness, and grammatical errors.
The document outlines a grading rubric for discussions with four critical elements: comprehension, engagement, critical thinking, and writing mechanics. Each element is scored on a scale and given a certain percentage of the total grade. Comprehension focuses on putting concepts in one's own words and using examples and references. Engagement requires adding substantive information and asking meaningful questions. Critical thinking is about drawing logical conclusions supported by evidence. Writing mechanics deals with clarity, conciseness, and grammatical errors.
Critical Elements Distinguished Proficient Emerging Not Evident Value
Comprehension Able to put key Able to put key Able to put key Unable to put key 25% concepts in one’s own concepts in one’s own concepts in one’s concepts in one’s own words and provides words and cites own words AND words OR does not unique examples to examples to illustrate utilizes at least 1 utilize at least 1 illustrate concepts concepts AND utilizes STRONG scholarly STRONG scholarly AND utilizes at least 1 at least 1 STRONG reference. reference. STRONG scholarly scholarly reference. reference. (20-22) (18-19) (0-17) (23-25) Engagement Adds substantive Adds substantive Adds substantive Does not add 25% information, asks information to the information to the substantive meaningful questions discussion and asks discussion. information to the to peers, and provides meaningful questions to (18-19) discussion. substantive peers. (0-17) responses. (20-22) (23-25) Critical Thinking Draws insightful Draws informed Draws logical Does not draw logical 30% conclusions that are conclusions that are conclusions. conclusions. thoroughly defended justified with evidence. (21-23) (0-20) with evidence and (24-26) examples. (27-30) Writing Able to write Able to write responses Able to write Unable to write 20% (Mechanics) responses that can be that can be easily responses that responses that others easily understood and understood OR 2-5 others can read and can read and that are clear and grammatical errors understand OR 5-10 understand OR more concise. No more exist. grammatical errors than 10 grammatical than 2 grammatical (16-17) exist. errors exist. errors exist. (14-15) (0-13) (18-20) Earned Total: Comments. 100%