Week 4 - Assignment

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Start Assignment

Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2

Back to Week at a Glance


(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/69491/modules/items/2083525)

PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL AND


HEPATOBILIARY DISORDERS
(https://cdn-

media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Getty/1920x938/GettyLicense_495558828.jpg) Gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary


disorders affect the structure and function of the GI tract. Many of these disorders often have similar symptoms, such as
abdominal pain, cramping, constipation, nausea, bloating, and fatigue. Since multiple disorders can be tied to the same
symptoms, it is important for advanced practice nurses to carefully evaluate patients and prescribe a treatment that targets
the cause rather than the symptom.

Once the underlying cause is identified, an appropriate drug therapy plan can be recommended based on medical history and
individual patient factors. In this Assignment, you examine a case study of a patient who presents with symptoms of a
possible GI/hepatobiliary disorder, and you design an appropriate drug therapy plan.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.


Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/69491/modules/items/2083535)

To Prepare:

Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment
Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.
Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder related to the
gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of a disorder from another system or
other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological disorder.
Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 4
Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction,
summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center offers an example of
those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm
(http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm) ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial


2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Explain your diagnosis for 25 to >22.25 pts 22.25 to >19.75 pts 19.75 to >17.25 pts 17.25 to >0 pts
the patient, including your Excellent Good Fair Poor
rationale for the diagnosis.
The response The response provides a The response inaccurately The response
accurately and clearly basic explanation of 1-2 or vaguely explains the inaccurately and
explains in detail the diagnoses for the patient, diagnosis for the patient, vaguely explains the
diagnosis for the including an accurate including an inaccurate or diagnosis for the
patient, including an rationale for the vague rationale for the patient, including an
accurate and thorough diagnosis that may diagnosis that may or may inaccurate and vague 25 pts
rationale for the support clinical judgment. not support clinical rationale for the
diagnosis that supports judgment. diagnosis that does
clinical judgment. not support clinical
judgment, or is
missing.

Describe an appropriate 30 to >26.7 pts 26.7 to >23.7 pts 23.7 to >20.7 pts 20.7 to >0 pts
drug therapy plan based Excellent Good Fair Poor
on the patient's history,
The response The response describes The response The response
diagnosis, and drugs
accurately and a basic explanation of inaccurately or vaguely inaccurately and
currently prescribed.
completely describes in the appropriate drug describes an appropriate vaguely describes an
detail an appropriate therapy plan based on drug therapy plan based appropriate drug
30 pts
drug therapy plan based the patient's history, on the patient's history, therapy plan based on
on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs diagnosis, and drugs the patient's history,
diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed. currently prescribed. diagnosis, and drugs
currently prescribed. currently prescribed.

Justify why you would 30 to >26.7 pts 26.7 to >23.7 pts 23.7 to >20.7 pts 20.7 to >0 pts
recommend this drug Excellent Good Fair Poor
therapy plan for this
The response provides The response provides The response provides The response provides
patient. Be specific and
an accurate, clear, and a basic justification for an inaccurate or vague an inaccurate and
provide examples.
detailed justification for the recommended drug justification for the vague justification for
the recommended drug therapy plan for this recommended drug the recommended
therapy plan for this patient. ... The response therapy plan for this drug therapy plan for
patient. ... The response includes only 1-2 patient. ... The response this patient, or is
includes specific, examples that fully may include examples, missing. ... The
30 pts
accurate, and detailed support the justification which may inaccurately or response does not
examples that fully provided. vaguely support the include examples that
support the justification justification provided. support the justification
provided. provided, or is missing.

Written Expression and 5 to >4.45 pts 4.45 to >3.95 pts 3.95 to >3.45 pts 3.45 to >0 pts 5 pts
Formatting - Paragraph Excellent Good Fair Poor
Development and
Paragraphs and Paragraphs and Paragraphs and Paragraphs and
Organization: Paragraphs
sentences follow sentences follow writing sentences follow writing sentences follow writing
make clear points that
writing standards for standards for flow, standards for flow, standards for flow,
support well developed
flow, continuity, and continuity, and clarity continuity, and clarity continuity, and clarity
ideas, flow logically, and
clarity. 80% of the time. 60%–79% of the time. less than 60% of the
demonstrate continuity of
time.
Criteria Ratings Pts
ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused--neither
long and rambling nor
short and lacking
substance.

Written Expression and 5 to >4.45 pts 4.45 to >3.95 pts 3.95 to >3.45 pts 3.45 to >0 pts
Formatting - English Excellent Good Fair Poor
writing standards: Correct
Uses correct Contains a few (1–2) Contains several (3–4) Contains many (≥ 5)
grammar, mechanics, and
grammar, spelling, grammar, spelling, and grammar, spelling, and grammar, spelling, and
proper punctuation 5 pts
and punctuation with punctuation errors punctuation errors punctuation errors that
no errors interfere with the reader’s
understanding

Written Expression and 5 to >4.45 pts 4.45 to >3.95 pts 3.95 to >3.45 pts 3.45 to >0 pts
Formatting - The paper Excellent Good Fair Poor
follows correct APA format
Uses correct APA Contains a few (1–2) Contains several (3–4) Contains many (≥ 5)
for title page, headings,
format with no errors APA format errors APA format errors APA format errors
font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers, running head, 5 pts
parenthetical/in-text
citations, and reference
list.

Total Points: 100

You might also like