Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EBCL Marathon Notes
EBCL Marathon Notes
Jaiswal
EBCL
1
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Need of competition
Competition is now universally acknowledged as the best means of ensuring that
✓ Consumers get wide range of products and services at the competitive prices
✓ Producers take steps for innovation which helps them in reducing costs and meeting consumer
demands.
✓ Helps in improving quality of goods and services
✓ Competition prevents Monopolies in market.
✓ It leads to Economic Growth of the country.
2
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
The MRTP Act was passed to ensure that operation of economic system does not result in the
concentration of economic power to common detriment.
However, all over the world, it was found that private monopolies can be detrimental to national
economy and control is required. It was felt that fair and free competition is requires for growth of
healthy economy.
Thus, the Competition Act, 2002 was enacted keeping in view of economic development of the
country, for establishment of commission to prevent practices having adverse effect on competition,
to promote and sustain competition in market, to protect the interest of consumer and ensure
freedom of trade carried on by other participants in markets, in India, and matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto
3
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
4
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
5
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
JV is an exception
6
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Bid Rigging
✓ Bidding→ intention→ enable the procurement of goods or services on the most favourable
terms and conditions.
✓ Invitation of bids is resorted to both by Government and private bodies
✓ objective of securing the most favourable prices and conditions may be negated if the
prospective bidders collude or act in concert. Such collusive bidding or bid rigging
contravenes the very purpose of inviting tenders and is inherently anti- competitive
Some of the most commonly adopted ways in which collusive bidding or bid rigging may occur are
1. agreements to submit identical bids
2. agreements as to who shall submit the lowest bid, agreements for the submission of cover bids
(voluntarily inflated bids)
3. Agreements not to bid against each other,
4. Agreements on common norms to calculate prices or terms of bids
5. Agreements to squeeze out outside bidders
6. Agreements designating bid winners in advance on a rotational basis, or on a geographical or
customer allocation basis
7
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
b) “Exclusive supply agreement” includes any agreement restricting in any manner from acquiring
or otherwise dealing in any goods other than those of the seller or any other person.
Thus, where a manufacturer asks a dealer not to deal in similar products of its competitor directly or
indirectly and discontinues the supply on the ground that dealer also deals in product of suppliers’
competitor’s goods is an illustration of exclusive dealing agreement. [Bhartia Curtec Hammer Ltd. In-
re (1997)
c) “Exclusive distribution agreement” includes any agreement to limit, restrict or withhold the
output or supply of any goods or allocate any area or market for the disposal or sale of the goods.
Requiring a distributor not to sell the goods of the manufacturer beyond the prescribed territory is a
good example of exclusive distribution agreement
d) “Refusal to deal” includes any agreement, which restricts, or is likely to restrict, by any method
the persons or classes of persons to whom goods are sold or from whom goods are bought.
For eg. an agreement which provides that the franchisees will not deal in products or goods of
similar nature for a period of three years from the date of determination of agreement within a
radius of five kms from showroom amounts to exclusive dealing agreement. DGIR v. Titan industries
(2001)
e) “Resale price maintenance” includes any agreement to sell goods on condition that the prices to
be charged on resale by the purchaser shall be the prices stipulated by the seller unless it is clearly
stated that prices lower than those prices may be charged
8
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Dominant position means a position of strength, enjoyed by an enterprise, in the relevant market,
in India, which enables it to -
• operate independently of competitive forces prevailing in the relevant market
or
• affect its competitors or consumers or the relevant market in its favour
Section 4(2) states that there shall be abuse of dominant position, if an enterprise or group
a) directly or indirectly imposes unfair or discriminatory :
➢ condition in purchase or sale of goods or services; or
➢ price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of goods or service.
b) limits or restricts :
➢ production of goods or provision of services or market therefore; or
➢ technical or scientific development relating to goods or services to the prejudice of consumers.
c) Indulges in practice or practices resulting in denial of market access in any other manner.
d) Makes conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by other parties of supplementary
obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the
subject of such contracts.
e) Uses its dominant position in one relevant market to enter into, or protect, other relevant market
9
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Section 6(1)→ any person or enterprise from entering into a combination which causes or is likely
to cause as appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market in India and if such
a combination is formed, it shall be void
Section 6(2) → any person or enterprise→ proposes to enter Into any combination→ notice +
details of the proposed combination → CCI,
10
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
The Commission shall have due regard to all or any of the factors for the purposes of determining
whether the combination would have the effect of or is likely to have an appreciable adverse effect
on competition in the relevant market, namely
a) extent of barriers to entry into the market;
b) level of combination in the market
c) likelihood that the combination would result in the parties to the combination being able to
significantly increase prices or profit margin.
d) extent to which substitutes are available or are likely to be available in the market
e) market share, in the relevant market, of the persons or enterprise in a combination, individually
and as a combination;
f) likelihood that the combination would result in the removal of a effective competitor or
competitors in the market;
g) nature and extent of vertical integration in the market
11
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Powers of CCI
1. to inquire into anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant position ;
2. to determine whether an agreement has an appreciable adverse effect on competition ;
3. enquire whether a combination has caused or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on
competition ;
4. to issue 'cease and desist' orders ;
5. to grant such interim relief as would be necessary in a particular case ;
6. to award compensation ;
7. to impose fines ;
8. to order division of dominant undertakings ;
12
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
9. to order demerger ;
10. to order cost for frivolous complaints
Competition Advocacy
Section 49 of the Competition Act, 2002 provides that while formulating a policy on competition
including review of laws related to competition, the central Government may make a referee to the
ACCI for its opinion on the possible effects of such a policy on competition.
The Commission shall within 60 days of receipt of such a reference, given its opinion on it to the
Central Government. Thereafter the central Government may formulate such policy as it deems fit It
may be noted that the rule of the Commission is advisory and the opinion given by it shall not be
binding on the Central Government.
The CCI had also been assigned the role to take prescribed suitable measures for the following;
13
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Director General
✓ Appointed by CG
✓ CG can also appoint such number of additional, joint, deputy or assistant Director Generals
or other advisers, consultants or offices .
✓ DG shall be appointed from amongst the persons of integrity and outstanding ability and
who have experience in investigation and knowledge of accountancy, management,
business, public administration, international tirade, economics, law etc.
✓ He is an important functionary under the Competition Act 2002.
✓ He assists the Commission by furnishing Investigation Report in respect of such matters as
are referred to him by the CCI .
✓ He also assists the commission in conducting proceedings of enquiries which are initiated by
the CCI suo moto.
Acts taking place outside India but having an effect on competition in India
Section 32 extends the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India to inquire and pass orders
in accordance with the provisions of the Act into an agreement or dominant position or
combination, which is likely to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition in relevant
market in India, notwithstanding that, an agreement referred to in Section 3 has been entered into
outside India; or any party to such agreement is outside India; or
✓ any enterprise abusing the dominant position is outside India; or
✓ a combination has taken place outside India; or
✓ any party to combination is outside India; or
✓ any other matter or practice or action arising out of such agreement or dominant position
or
✓ Combination is outside India.
14
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Rectification of orders
The Commission may amend any order passed by it under the provisions of this Act with a view to
rectifying any mistake apparent from the record. Section 38(2) provides that subject to other
provisions of this Act, the Commission may make –
(a) an amendment of an order of its own motion;
(b) an amendment for rectifying any mistake apparent from record, which has been brought to its
notice by any party to the order.
An explanation below the Section clarifies that while rectifying any mistake apparent from the
record, the Commission shall not amend substantive part of the order passed by it under the
provisions of this Act
15
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Penalty for failure to directions of Commission & Director General [Section 43]
If any person fails to comply with a direction given by the Commission or the Director General then
such person shall be punishable with fine which may extend to Rs 1 lakh for each day comply with
during which such failure continues subject to a maximum of 1 Crore
If any person fails to pay the fine imposed → imprisonment upto 3 years or with fine up to 25 Crore
or with both
Contravention by Companies
A company means a body corporate and includes a firm or other association of individuals; director,
in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm for the purposes of penalties in connection with
contravention of the provisions of the Act by companies.
Where any rule, regulation, order made by the Commission or any direction issued thereunder is
contravened by a company, every person who, at the time the contravention was committed, was in
charge, and was responsible to the company for conducting business of the company, as well as the
company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the contravention and shall be liable to be proceeded
against and punished. However it will be a good defence by a person liable to any punishment if he
proves that the contravention was committed without his knowledge or that he has exercised all
due diligence to prevent the commission of an offence.
16
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
17
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
18
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
FUNCTIONS OF RBI
a) Banking Functions
b) Issue bank notes
c) Monetary Policy Functions
d) Public Debt Functions
e) Foreign Exchange Management
f) Banking Regulation & Supervision
g) Regulation and Supervision of NBFCs
h) Regulation & Supervision of Co-operative banks
i) Regulation of Derivatives and Money Market Instruments
j) Payment and Settlement Functions
k) Consumer Protection Functions
l) Financial Inclusion and Development Functions
19
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
✓ Repo Rate: The (fixed) interest rate at which the RBI provides overnight liquidity to banks
against the collateral of government and other approved securities under the Liquidity
Adjustment Facility (LAF).
✓ Reverse Repo Rate: The (fixed) interest rate at which the RBI absorbs liquidity, on an
overnight basis, from banks against the collateral of eligible government securities under the
LAF.
✓ Marginal Standing Facility (MSF): A facility under which scheduled commercial banks can
borrow additional amount of overnight money from the RBI by dipping into their Statutory
Liquidity Ratio (SLR) portfolio up to a limit at a penal rate of interest. This provides a safety
valve against unanticipated liquidity shocks to the banking system.
✓ Bank Rate: It is the rate at which the RBI is ready to buy or rediscount bills of exchange or
other commercial papers..
✓ Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR): The average daily balance that a bank is required to maintain with
the RBI as a share of such per cent of its Net demand and time liabilities (NDTL) that the RBI
may notify from time to time in the Gazette of India.
✓ Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR): The share of NDTL that a bank is required to maintain in safe
and liquid assets, such as, unencumbered government securities, cash and gold. Changes in
SLR often influence the availability of resources in the banking system for lending to the
private sector.
20
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
21
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Investments: The RBI requires banks to classify their investment portfolios into three categories for
the purpose of valuation:
Held to Maturity (HTM),
Available for Sale (AFS) and
Held for Trading (HFT).
22
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
OBJECTIVE OF FEMA
1. To facilitate external trade and payments
2. To promote orderly development & maintenance of foreign markets in India.
23
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Excludes → Person who has gone out of India or who stays outside India
i. For taking up employment outside India;
ii. For carrying on a business or vocation outside India;
iii. For any other purpose for an uncertain period
24
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
✓ PRI → any amount of foreign exchange is due → take all reasonable steps to realize and to
repatriate to India such foreign exchange
✓ On realisation of foreign exchange due, a person shall repatriate the same to India, namely bring
into, or receive in, India and –
a) sell it to an authorised person in India in exchange for rupees; or
b) retain or hold it in account with an authorised dealer in India to the extent specified by the
Reserve Bank; or
25
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
c) use it for discharge of a liability denominated in foreign exchange to the extent and in the
manner specified by the Reserve Bank.
A person not being an individual resident in India shall sell the realised foreign exchange to an
authorised person within the period specified below: -
✓ Foreign exchange due or accrued as remuneration for services rendered, or in settlement of
any lawful obligation, or an income on assets held outside India, or as inheritance, gift,
within 7 days from the date of its receipt;
✓ in all other cases within a period of 90 days from the date of its receipt
26
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Commission per transaction to agents abroad for sale of residential flats/ commercial plots in India
exceeding the limit of US $ 25000 or 5% of the inward remittance per transaction whichever is
higher
exceeding US $ 1 million per project for any consultancy services procured from abroad
27
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Donations by Corporate, exceeding one per cent of their foreign exchange earnings during the
previous three financial years or US$ 5,000,000, whichever is less, for:-
➢ creation of Chairs in reputed educational institutes,
➢ to funds (not being an investment fund) promoted by educational institutes; and
➢ to a technical institution or body or association in the field of activity of the donor Company
28
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
29
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Acquisition under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) A resident individual can send
remittances under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme for purchasing immovable property outside
India
30
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Note: Citizens of Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, China, Nepal, Iran or Bhutan cannot
acquire immovable property in India without the prior permission of RBI. However, they can acquire
immovable property in India by way of lease for a period upto 5 years without the RBI's approval.
3) Establishment of a branch office or liaison office or project office or any other place of
business in India
✓ Prior approval of RBI is required → person resident outside India → open in India a branch
office or a liaison office or a project office or any other place of business by whatever name
called
A person resident outside India who has established in India a branch office or place of business (but
not a mere liaison office) in accordance with the RBI Regulations can acquire any immovable
property in India which is necessary for an incidental to carry on such activity.
The person acquiring such property in India shall file declaration in the prescribed form with the RBI
within 90 days of the acquisition of property.
If the asset is sold, sale proceeds can be repatriated only with the prior permission of RBI
31
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
32
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Directorate of Enforcement
✓ Section 36 empowers CG to establish a Directorate of Enforcement
✓ CG appoints →Director and other officers or class of Officers, for the purposes of the
enforcement of the Act
✓ CG authorise →Director, Additional Director, Special Director or Deputy Director →to
appoint officers below the rank of Assistant Director
✓ CG may, by order authorise any officers of customs or Central Excise or any police officer or
officers of Central or State Government to exercise such powers and discharge such duties
of the Director of Enforcement or any other officer of the Enforcement as stated in the
order.
Investigation
Section 37 → Director of Enforcement and other officers below the rank of an Assistant Director to
take up for investigation
✓ CG may also authorise any officer not below the rank of Under Secretary to Government of
India
COMPOUNDING OF OFFENCES
✓ the process of voluntarily admitting the contravention, pleading guilty and seeking redressal.
✓ Reserve Bank is empowered to compound any contraventions
✓ Willful, malafide and fraudulent transactions are, however, viewed seriously, which will not be
compounded by the Reserve Bank
✓ Applications seeking compounding of contraventions under section 3(a) of FEMA, 1999 may be
submitted to the Directorate of Enforcement
33
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
✓ undertaking that they are not under investigation of any agency such as DOE, CBI, etc. in
order to complete the compounding process within the time frame.
3) Application returned / rejected, the application fees of Rs.5000/- will be refunded
4) Order within 180days from application
5) Factor to be considered
a) Amount of unfair gain
b) Loss to any authority/exchanges
c) Economic benefits accrued
d) History of non-compliance
e) Disclosure of facts
34
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
35
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
b. Gift/donation
c. Going abroad on employment.
d. Emigration
Remittance of any amount of foreign exchange outside India in excess of this limit may be allowed
only towards meeting incidental expenses in the country of immigration
e. Maintenance of close relatives abroad.
f. Business trip
g. Medical treatment abroad
h. Facilities available to students for pursuing their studies abroad
Documentation by Remitter
The resident individual shall
✓ compulsorily designate →> branch of an AD through which all the remittances under the
Scheme will be made.
✓ furnish Form A2 for purchase of foreign exchange under LRS.
✓ have PAN card to make remittances However, PAN card need not be insisted upon for
remittances made towards permissible current account transactions up to USD 25,000.
✓ Investor, who has remitted funds under LRS can retain, reinvest the income earned on the
investments.
36
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Commission to agents abroad for sale of residential flats or commercial plots in India
subject to prior approval RBI if
commission per transaction to agents abroad
for sale of residential flats or commercial plots in India
exceeds USD 25,000 or five percent of the inward remittance whichever is more.
Prohibited Transactions
1. Remittance out of lottery winnings
2. Remittance of income from racing/riding etc. or any other hobby.
3. Remittance for purchase of lottery tickets, banned/prescribed magazines, football pools,
sweepstakes etc.
4. Payment of commission on exports made towards equity investment in joint ventures/ wholly
owned subsidiaries abroad of Indian companies
5. Remittance of dividend by any company to which the requirement of dividend balancing is
applicable
6. Payment of commission on exports under Rupee State Credit Route, except commission up-to
10% of invoice value of exports of tea and tobacco
7. Payment related to ‘call back services’ of telephones
8. Remittance of interest income on funds held in Non-resident Special Rupee (Account) Scheme
37
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
38
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Restrictions does not apply to the acceptance, by any person of any foreign contribution:
a) By way of salary, wages or other remuneration from any foreign source
b) By way of payment, in the course of international trade or commerce,
c) As an agent of a foreign source in relation to any transaction made by such foreign source with the
CG or SG; or
d) By way of a gift or presentation made to him as a member of any Indian delegation
e) from his relative; or
f) by way of any scholarship, stipend or any payment of like nature
Foreign Hospitality
✓ Any offer not being a purely casual one
✓ Made in cash or kind
✓ It includes the cost of travel, boarding, lodging, medical treatment.
39
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
40
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Suspension of certificate
✓ Central Government may suspend for maximum 180 days
✓ May suspend if investigation is pending for cancellation of such certificate
✓ Whose certificate has been suspended shall not receive any foreign contribution during such
period
✓ Shall not utilise fund without prior approval of Central Government
41
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Cancellation of certificate
a) obtained on the basis of incorrect or false statement; or
b) violated any of the T/C* of the certificate or renewal thereof; or
c) In the opinion of the CG, it is necessary in the public interest; or
d) violated any of the provisions of this Act or rules or order made thereunder; or
e) has not been engaged in any reasonable activity in its chosen field for the benefit of the society
for 2 consecutive years or has become defunct
Renewal of certificate
within six months before the expiry of the period of the certificate
42
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
RBI can penalize NBFCs for violating the provisions of the RBI Act or the directions or orders issued
by RBI under RBI Act.
The penal action can also result in RBI cancelling the Certificate of Registration issued to the NBFC,
or prohibiting them from accepting deposits and alienating their assets or filing a winding up petition
43
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Corporate Governance
Constitution of Committees of the Board
1. Audit Committee
i. min 3 members.
ii. ensure that an Information System Audit of the internal systems and processes is conducted at
least once in two years to assess operational risks faced by the applicable NBFCs.
2. Nomination Committee
to ensure 'fit and proper' status of proposed/ existing directors.
44
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
“Systemically important non-deposit taking non-banking financial company”, NBFC not accepting /
holding public deposits and
having total assets of Rs. 500 crore and above as shown in the last audited balance sheet
Principal business for this purpose is defined as aggregate of financing real/physical assets
supporting economic activity and income arising therefrom is not less than 60% of its total assets
and total income respectively.
Investment Company
means any company which is a financial institution carrying on as its principal business the
acquisition of securities
45
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Infrastructure Finance Co
is a non-banking finance company
a) which deploys at least 75 per cent of its total assets in infrastructure loans,
b) has a minimum Net Owned Funds of `300 crore,
c) has a minimum credit rating of ‘A ‘or equivalent,
d) a CRAR of 15%
NBFC-Factor is a
✓ non-deposit taking NBFC
✓ engaged in the principal business of factoring.
✓ The financial assets in the factoring business should constitute at least 50 percent of its total
assets and its income derived from factoring business should not be less than 50 percent of
its gross income
46
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
47
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
developer is/has
a) unable to discharge the functions or perform the duties;
b) persistently defaulted in complying with the directions of the board;
c) violated the term and conditions of the letter;
d) The financial position of the developer is such that he is unable to discharge the duties and
obligation imposed on him by the letter of approval.
48
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Establishment of SEZ
Central Govt.
State Govt. or
any other person,
jointly or severally, may establish a Special Economic Zone
49
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
50
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
51
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
i. An unfair contract or unfair trade practice or a restrictive trade practice has been adopted by any
trader or service provider;
ii. The goods bought by him or agreed to be bought by him suffer from one or more defects
iii. The services hired or availed of or agreed to be hired or availed of by him suffer from any
deficiency;
iv. A trader or a service provider, as the case may be, has charged for the goods or for the services
mentioned in the complaint, a price in excess of the price—
a. fixed by or under any law for the time being in force; or
b. displayed on the goods or any package containing such goods; or
v. The services which are hazardous or likely to be hazardous to life and safety of the public when
used, are being offered by a person who provides any service and who knows it to be injurious to life
and safety;
buys any goods for a consideration which has hires or avails of any service for a consideration
been paid or promised or partly paid and partly which has been paid or promised or partly paid
promised, or under any system of deferred and partly promised, or under any system of
payment and includes any user of such goods deferred payment and includes any beneficiary
other than the person who buys such goods for of such service other than the person who hires
consideration paid or promised or partly paid or or avails of the services for consideration paid
partly promised, or under any system of deferred or promised, or partly paid and partly promised,
payment, when such use is made with the or under any system of deferred payment,
approval of such person, but does not include a when such services are availed of with the
person who obtains such goods for resale or for approval of the first mentioned person, but
any commercial purpose; does not include a person who avails of such
service for any commercial purpose.
52
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Consumer dispute
a dispute where the person against whom a complaint has been made, denies or disputes the
allegations contained in the complaint
53
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
which is required to be maintained by or under any law for the time being in force or has been
undertaken to be performed by a person in pursuance of a contract or otherwise in relation to any
service and includes—
i. any act of negligence or omission or commission by such person which causes loss or injury to the
consumer; and
ii. deliberate withholding of relevant information by such person to the consumer.
54
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
55
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Unfair Contract -
• Contract between manufacturer or trader or service provider and consumer
which cause significant change in rights of consumer.
• Which includes –
a) Charging Excessive security deposit.
b) Imposing Misappropriate penalty.
c) Refuse to accept early repayment of debt
d) Any other unfair terms, penalty
56
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
57
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
58
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
b) file complaints before the District Commission, the State Commission or the National
Commission, as the case may be, under this Act;
c) intervene in any proceedings before the District Commission or State Commission or National
Commission,
d) review the matters relating to consumer rights,
e) recommend adoption of international covenants
f) undertake and promote research in the field of consumer rights;
g) spread and promote awareness on consumer rights;
h) encourage non-Governmental organisations and other institutions working in the field of
consumer rights to co-operate and work with consumer protection agencies;
59
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Imprisonment
upto 1 year for First Contravention.
upto 3 years for Subsequent Contravention
Where the Central Authority deems it necessary, it may, by order, prohibit the endorser of a false or
misleading advertisement from making endorsement of any product or service for up-to 1 year.
60
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Qualifications method of recruitment, procedure for appointment, term of office, resignation and
removal of the President and members of the District Commission of President and members of
District Commission as may be prescribed by CG
value of the goods or services paid as consideration Does not exceed fifty lakh rupees
A complaint shall be instituted in a District Commission within the local limits of whose jurisdiction
a) Opposite party reside or
b) Each of opposite party reside or
c) Business or branch office is situated or
d) Cause of action arise
e) the complainant resides or personally works for gain
61
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Where the parties agree for settlement by mediation and give their consent in writing, the District
Commission shall, within 5 days of receipt of such consent, refer the matter for mediation, and in
such case, the provisions of Chapter V, relating to mediation, shall apply
62
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
• Complaints where value of goods and services paid Exceeds fifty lakhs but does not
exceed two crore rupees. or Appeal against the order of district commission.
• Question of law.
• Appeal to National Commission within 30 days (extension if it thinks so)
• Deposit 50% of the fees.
• Dispose of appeal by State Commission or National Commission within 90
Days
✓ Complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as consideration Exceed
two crore rupees
✓ Appeals against the orders of any State Commission;
✓ Appeals against the orders of the Central Authority
Appeal against order of National Commission → Supreme Court within 30 days on deposit
50% of amount
63
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
MEDIATION
Establishment of Consumer Mediation Cell (Sec 74)
✓ SG → establish a consumer mediation cell to be attached to each of the District Commissions and
the State Commissions of that State.
✓ CG → establish a consumer mediation cell to be attached to the National Commission and each
of the regional Benches.
Every consumer mediation cell shall submit a quarterly report to the District Commission, State
Commission or the National Commission to which it is attached, in the manner specified by
regulations.
64
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
65
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
✓ The purpose and object of the Act is prevention of money laundering, which simply means
conversion of tainted (black) money into untainted(white) money.
✓ Money laundering is the processing of criminal proceeds to disguise its illegal origin.
✓ Terrorism, illegal arms sales, financial crimes, smuggling and the activities of organized crime,
including drug trafficking and prostitution rings, generate huge sums.
66
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Thus, FATF study, examine and evaluate the current situation, defines the policy and initiatives
measures that can act as solution to the problem of money laundering
67
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Proceeds of Crime
means any property
derived or obtained
directly or indirectly
by any person
as a result of criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence or the value of such
property
Person in default
Person who
o Knowingly entered into transaction related to proceeds of crime
o Acquire or own or possess or transfer the proceeds of crime
o Conceal proceeds of crime
Section 4
any person who commits the offence of money laundering shall be punishable
imprisonment min 3 years and upto 7 years + fine + Confiscate the proceeds of crime.
68
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
and such proceeds of crime are likely to be concealed, transferred or dealt with in any
manner which may result in frustrating any proceedings relating to confiscation of such
proceeds of crime,
such officer may by order in writing, provisionally attach such property for a period not
exceeding 180 days from the date of the order
The Director or any other officer who provisionally attaches any property shall, within a period of 30
days from such attachment file a complaint, stating the facts of such attachment before the
Adjudicating Authority
KYC Policy
✓ These ‘Know Your Customer’ guidelines have been revisited in the context of the
Recommendations made by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on Anti Money
Laundering (AML) standards and on Combating Financing of Terrorism (CFT).
✓ Banks have been advised to ensure that a proper policy framework on ‘Know Your
Customer’ and Anti Money Laundering measures is formulated with the approval of their
Board and put in place
✓ Banks should keep in mind that the information collected from the customer for the
purpose of opening of account is to be treated as confidential and details thereof are not to
be revealed for cross selling or any other like purposes.
69
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
✓ Banks should, ensure that information sought from the customer is in conformity with the
guidelines issued in this regard.
✓ Banks should ensure that any remittance of funds by way of demand draft, mail/telegraphic
transfer or any other mode and issue of travellers’ cheques for value of Rupees fifty
thousand and above is effected by debit to the customer’s account or against cheques and
not against cash payment
✓ With effect from April 1, 2012, banks should not make payment of cheques/drafts/pay
orders/banker’s cheques bearing that date or any subsequent date, if they are presented
beyond the period of three months from the date of such instrument.
✓ Banks should ensure that the provisions of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010,
wherever applicable, are strictly adhered to.
Banks should frame their KYC policies incorporating the following four key elements:
a) Customer Acceptance Policy;
b) Customer Identification Procedures;
c) Monitoring of Transactions; and
d) Risk Management
70
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Manufacture 2(i)
"manufacturer" in relation to any weight or measure, means a person who –
i. manufactures weight or measure,
ii. manufactures ,aquires or Assembles parts and claims the end product to be a weight or measure
manufactured by himself
iii. puts, or causes to be put, his own mark on any complete weight or measure made or
manufactured by others.
71
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Section 6 states that the base unit of numeration shall be the unit of the international form of Indian
numeral. Every numeration shall be made in accordance with the decimal system.
Section 11
a) Provides that no person shall, in relation to any goods, things or service, quote, or make
announcement of, whether by word of mouth or otherwise, any price or charge, or issue or exhibit
any price list, invoice, cash memo or other document,
b) Or prepare or publish any advertisement, poster or other document, or indicate the net quantity
of a pre-packaged commodity, or express in relation to any transaction or protection, any quantity
or dimension, otherwise than in accordance with the standard unit of weight, measure or
numeration
72
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Section 15→ Director, Controller / any legal metrology officer may → power to inspect, if he has any
reason to believe,
that any weight or
measure or
other goods
in relation to which any trade and commerce has taken place or is intended to take place and in
respect of which an offence punishable under this Act appears to have been, or is likely to be,
committed are either kept or concealed in any premises or are in the course of transportation.
Forfeiture
Every non-standard or unverified weight or measure, and every package used in the course of, or in
relation to, any trade and commerce and seized under section 15, shall be liable to be forfeited to
the State Government. Unless the same is verified and stamped within such time as may be
prescribed
73
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Section 20 No weight or measure, whether singly or as a part or component of any machine shall be
imported unless it conforms to the standards of weight or measure established by or under this Act
Section 24 Every person possessing using or intending to use any weight or measure, shall, before
putting such weight or measure into such use, have such weight or measure verified.
74
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Thus, by combining the aforesaid two definitions, we can say that the Immovable property includes
land,
benefits arising out of the land,
things attached to the earth, etc.,
but doesn’t include
standing timber,
growing crops and
grass.
Transfer Of Property[Section 5]
act by which a living person conveys property
in present, or in future,
to one or more other living persons, or to himself, and one or more other living persons and "to
transfer property" is to perform such an act.
75
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
A transfer of property not in existence operates as a contract to be performed in future which may
be specially enforced as soon as the property comes into existence (Jugalkishore v. Ram Cotton
Company, (1955) I SCR 1369).
Every person who is competent to contract and entitled to transferable property, or authorised to
dispose of property is competent to transfer such property.
According to Indian Contract Act, a person is competent to contract when he is a major and of sound
mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.
But a minor can be a transferee as there is nothing in the Transfer of Property Act to disqualify a
person, who is a minor to be a transferee.
For Example A, a Hindu who has separate property, dies leaving a widow W and a brother L, L’s
succession to the property is dependent upon two factors, viz.,
✓ his surviving the widow, W, and
✓ W leaving the property intact.
L has only a bare chance of succession to the property left by A.
This is spes successionis, and therefore, cannot be transferred (Amrit Narayana v. Gyan Singh,).
76
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
2. Right of Re-Entry
✓ This is a right which a lesser has against the leasee for breach of an express condition of
lease which provides that on its breach the leaser may re-enter the land.
✓ The transferor reserves this right to himself after having parted with the possession of the
property.
✓ This right is for his personal benefit and cannot, therefore, be transferred.
3. Transfer of Easement
✓ Easement means an interest in land owned by another that entitles his holders to a specific
limited use or enjoyment.
✓ As an easement confers no proprietary right on its owner, it cannot be transferred apart
from the land itself.
✓ For example, the right of certain villagers to bath in another’s tank cannot be transferred.
77
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Absolute Interest
▪ Complete interest.
▪ Consist of bundle of rights which include right to use, sell, lease, mortgage, gift etc.
▪ Owner has absolute interest over the property
Reversion Interest: -
▪ Reversion means property comes to the original owner.
▪ Transfer of interest for specific period then interest cover back with the original owner.
Remainder Interest: -
▪ Means where property goes to the third party after specific time.
Vested Interest
✓ does not depend upon the condition or if it depend upon the condition such condition
bound to be happen.
✓ Cannot be defeated by death of transfer
✓ Certain condition.
✓ Transferable.
✓ Heritable
✓ Vested interest includes vested in interest as vested in possession
Contingent Interest
✓ Transfer of interest which is based on happening or non-happening of uncertain event.
✓ Defeated by death of transferee
✓ Uncertain condition.
✓ Nontransferable.
✓ Non-heritable.
78
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Conditional Transfer
interest created on the transfer of property → depend on the fulfillment of a condition by the
transferee
Such a transfer may be subject to a condition precedent or a condition subsequent.
In condition precedent, the condition comes before the interest; whereas in condition subsequent,
the interest is created before the condition
Restraint on Enjoyment
✓ When a property is transferred absolutely, and transferor imposes any restraint on the
enjoyment of the property by the transferee, the restraint is treated as void.
79
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Important Doctrines
Doctrine of Election [Section 35]
✓ Election means ‘choice’.
✓ where a property is transferred to a person, then the transferee can make a choice between
whether to accept the transfer or to reject it.
✓ If he is accepting the transfer, then the transferee shall, along with the benefits of transfer , also
accept the burden of transfer.
✓ In nutshell, it means that a man taking a benefit under an instrument must also bear the
burden.
80
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
✓ It is an exception to the rule that a person cannot confer a better title than he himself has.
✓ An ostensible owner is one who has all the indicia of ownership without being the real owner.
✓ Where the true owner → permits another person to hold himself as the true owner of the
property and a third party, in good faith, deals with the person permitted, then such third party
will acquire a good title as against the true owner.
✓ Following conditions are required to be complied with, so as to provide the protection to the
third party against the true owner:
o The transferor is the ostensible owner;
o He is ostensible owner by the express or implied consent of the true owner;
o The transfer is for consideration;
o The transferee has acted in good faith.
81
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
82
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Lease
is a transaction whereby one person (i.e., lessor)
transfers the right to enjoy in an immovable property
to another person (i.e., lessee)
either for a certain time or in perpetuity,
in return of a consideration
Licence
Where one person grants
to another, or to a definite number of other persons,
a right to do, or continue to do,
in or upon the immovable property of the grantor
something which would, in the absence of such right, be unlawful.
Determination of leases
✓ By efflux of time or lapse of time
✓ By the happening of a special event
✓ Merger: → when the lessee buys the property of the lessor / lessee takes the lessor’s interest
by succession
✓ By surrender → when the lessee gives up his interest under a lease by mutual consent
✓ By forfeiture → occurs when there is breach of a condition in a lease contract by the lessee
Mortgage
transfer of an interest in specific immovable property for the purpose of securing any of the
following :
a) The payment of money advanced or to be advanced by way of loan; or
b) An existing or future debt; or
c) The performance of an engagement which may give rise to pecuniary liabilities
Transferor → Mortgagor.
Transferee → Mortgagee
83
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Kinds of Mortgage
1. Simple Mortgage
✓ mortgagor → personal liability for repayment.
✓ mortgaged property → not required to be delivered to the mortgagee,
✓ On default in making payment, mortgagee is entitled to cause mortgaged property to be
sold, after obtaining a decree from the court .
✓ loan → repaid, then Transfer will not take place
3. English Mortgage
(combination of Simple Mortgage and Mortgage by Conditional Sale)
✓ The mortgaged property is transferred absolutely by the mortgagor to the mortgagee.
✓ There is a personal covenant to repay on a certain date
4. Usufructuary Mortgage
✓ profit of the property is appropriated by the mortgagee towards discharge of the advance.
✓ delivery of possession of the mortgaged property to the mortgagee.
✓ The property is returned when the amount due is personally paid or is discharged by rents
and profits rececived.
84
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
6. Anomalous Mortgage
✓ This mortgage is the combination of two or more other kinds of mortgages.
✓ The remedy to the mortgagee may be by way of sale or by way of foreclosure, depending
the terms of the Deed
85
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
86
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
iv. any person in the name of his brother or sister or lineal ascendant or descendant, and the
consideration for such property has been provided or paid out of the known sources of the
individual;
property held jointly by more than one person, → notice to all persons holding such property
Adjudicating Authority → opportunity of being heard → pass an order → property is benami / not
benami as the case may be
87
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Adjudicating Authority → satisfied that some part of the properties is benami property, but is not
able to specifically identify such part, he shall record a finding to the best of his judgment as to
which part or properties is held benami.
Adjudicating Authority has reason to believe that a property, other than a property referred to him
by the Initiating Officer is benami property, it shall provisionally attach the property
Adjudicating Authority may, either on the application of any party, or suo moto, strike out the name
of any party improperly joined or add the name of any person
Confiscation of property
• opportunity of being heard → Confiscation order
• If appeal is filled then confiscation after the order of adjudicating
authority.
• order of confiscation → all right and tittle rest within central government free from encumbrance
and no compensation shall be payable .
• Possession shall be given to administrator appoint by central
government.
• Administrator → notice→ within 7days from notice surrender the
benami property.
• notice/ Order is not complied – forcibly Confiscate.
88
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Financial commitment means the aggregate amount of investment by way of ODI, debt other
than Overseas Portfolio Investment (OPI) and non-fund-based facility or facilities extended by
person resident in India to all foreign entities.
89
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Indian Entity
✓ A Company defined under the Companies Act, 2013
✓ A Body corporate incorporated by any law for the time being in force
✓ A Limited Liability Partnership formed under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008
✓ A Partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Conditions for Indian entity to lend or invest in any debt instruments issued by a foreign entity:
(i) the Indian entity is eligible to make ODI;
(ii) the Indian entity has made ODI in the foreign entity
(iii) the Indian entity has acquired control in the foreign entity on or before the date of making
such financial commitment
90
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Mode of Payment
(ii) from funds held in an account maintained in accordance with the provisions of the Foreign
Exchange Management Act;
(iv) by using the proceeds of American Depository Receipts or Global Depositary Receipts or
stock swap of such receipts or external commercial borrowings raised in accordance with the
provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations made thereunder for making ODI or financial
commitment by way of debt by an Indian entity
91
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Transfer or Liquidation
A person resident in India may transfer equity capital by way of sale to a person resident in
India, who is eligible to make such investment under these rules, or to a person resident outside
India
the diminution in value shall be duly certified by a registered valuer as per the Companies Act,
2013 if:
✓ investment is more than USD 10 million OR
✓ diminution exceeds twenty per cent of the total value of the outstanding dues
The certificate dated not more than six months before the date of the transaction shall be
submitted to the designated AD bank.
92
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
TYPES OF OFFERS
93
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
ACCEPTANCE
• Acceptance must be absolute / unqualified / unconditional
• Acceptance may be given by performance of conditions (General offer)
• It must be given within specified or reasonable time
• It must not precede an offer.
• It must be given by the person to whom offer is made
• Acceptance must be communicated
COMMUNICATION
• COMMUNICATION OF PROPOSAL/OFFER
An offer is complete when it is properly communicated to the offeree. The communication
of offer is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is
made
• COMMUNICATION OF ACCEPTANCE
(a) As against the proposer/offeror: The communication of an acceptance is complete
as against the offeror when it is put into a course of transmission to him so as to
be out of the power of the acceptor.
(b) As against the acceptor: The communication of acceptance as against the acceptor
is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the offeror.
CONTRACT
5. Consideration.
(a) Consideration means something
(b) It may be in cash or kind
(c) Must be lawful & real & not illusory
(d) It may adequate / inadequate
94
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
CONSIDERATION
✓ May be in CASH or KIND
✓ Something in return (quid pro quo)
✓ May be adequate or inadequate
✓ Should at desire of promisor
✓ Must be lawful
✓ Past, present, future
✓ Act which promisor is anyway bound to do is not consideration
✓ Can be given to or by 3rd Person (Stranger to consideration)
PARTIAL ILLEGALITY :-( Section 24 ) If any part of a single consideration for one or more
objects, or any one or any part of any one of several considerations for a single object, is
unlawful, the agreement is void.
95
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
CLASSIFICATION OF CONTRACTS
TYPE DEFINITION EFFECTS
• Creates legal rights &
Valid Having all essential element of
agreement obligations
section 10
• Enforceable by law
An agreement not
Void agreement enforceable by law is said to • No restitution
be void.
A contract which ceases to be
• Restitution,
enforceable by law becomes
Void Contract • Payment or compensation for
void when it ceases to be
performance
enforceable
An agreement which is • Valid till rescinded
Voidable enforceable by law at the • Restitution.
contract option of aggrieved party is • Voidable at the option of
a voidable contract aggrieved party
An agreement, which is • Void agreement
Illegal expressly or impliedly • Legal part enforceable
Agreement prohibited by law, is an • Collateral agreement
illegal agreement becomes void
Technical defects in a
Unenforceable contract may be due to non-
contract compliance of some of the legal
formalities.
96
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
VOID AGREEMENTS
AGREEMENTS OPPOSED TO PUBLIC POLICY
× Sale of goodwill
× Partner's competing business
× Rights of outgoing partner
× Partner's similar business on dissolution
× An agreement between any partner and the buyer of the firm's goodwill
× Trade Combinations
× Negative stipulations in service agreements
× Sole Selling Agent’s Agreement
EXCEPTIONS:
× any dispute between them in respect of any subject shall be referred to arbitration (present
disputes)
× To refer to arbitration any question between them which has already arisen or which may
arise in future, is valid; but such a contract must be in writing. (agreement to refer past &
future disputes to arbitration)
× Referring disputes to court in particular jurisdiction
97
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
✓ Share market transactions in which there is clear intention to give and take delivery share
is not wagering
✓ Contract of insurance is not wagering
✓ An agreement by way of wager is void.
✓ In the State of Maharashtra and of Gujarat wagering agreement are not only void but also
illegal. Hence, Collateral agreement will also become VOID
Undue Misreprese
Coercion Fraud Mistake
Influence ntation
Voidable Voidable
Voidable Voidable (Exception (Exception
s apply) s apply)
Mistake of
Mistake of Law
Fact
Law of
Unialteral Bilateral Foreign
Land
Law
CAPACITY TO CONTRACT
I. MINORS:
According to Section 3 of Indian Majority Act, 1875 A minor is a person who has not
completed 18 years of age. Every person domiciled in India attains majority on the
completion of 18 years of age.
In the following cases, a person attains majority on completion of 21 years of age:-
• Where the guardian of a minor is being appointed under Guardians and Wards Act,
1890.
• Where the superintendence of minor’s property is assumed by Court of Wards.
98
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
CONTINGENT CONTRACT
CHARACTERISTICS:
99
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Discharge of Contract
By
By By Mutual By Lapse of By operation of By Breach of
impossibility of
Performance Consent Time Law Contract
performance
100
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
101
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
2) Tommy has two properties, Property-M and Property-N. He sells his Property-N to John and
puts a condition that John should not construct more than one storey on Property-N so that
Property-M, which he retains, shall have good light and free air. Whether the condition
imposed by Tommy is ‘valid’ under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ? Give reasons
Ans) As per Section 11 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, where an immovable property is
transferred by one to another, the transferor should not impose conditions as to how and in what
manner the transferee should enjoy the property.
But the above provision is subject to an exception i.e. if the condition which is imposed by
transferor is for the benefit of another piece of immovable property which he retains then such a
condition is valid.
For Example : A has properties X and Y. He sells property Y to B and puts a condition that B should
not construct on property Y more than one storey so that A’s property X which he retains should
have good light and free air. Such a condition is valid.
Thus, it is clear that the condition imposed by Tommy is for the benefit of another property which
he retains. Such a condition is valid under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
3) Ramesh buys a second-hand car from Suresh for `4 Lakh. The car is a stolen property of Dinesh.
After two months of use Dinesh claims the car and deprives Ramesh of the car. Can Ramesh
claim compensation from Suresh ?
Ans) Yes, Ramesh can claim compensation from Suresh.
Section 14(a) of the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 provides that unless the circumstances of the
contract are such as to show a different intention, there is an implied condition as to title that the
seller, in an actual sale, has the right to sell the goods, and in agreement to sell, he will have a
right to sell the goods at the time when property is to pass.
As a result, if the title of the seller turns out to be defective, the buyer is entitled to reject the
goods and can recover the full price paid by him.
In Rowland v. Divall, A had bought a second-hand motor car from B and paid for it. After he had
used it for six months, he was deprived of it because the seller had no title to it. It was held that B
had broken the condition as to title and 'A' was therefore, entitled to recover the purchase
money from B
102
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
4) Ramu purchased a tractor from Mahendra Ltd. for tilling the land but he used it in idle time for
transportation of agricultural produce on hire. Some defects were developed in the engine of
the tractor. He complained to Mahendra Ltd., but all in vain. Then he filed a suit in Consumer
Disputes Redressal Forum for damages caused by the defects. Mahendra Ltd. pleaded that
Ramu is not a ‘consumer’ within the definition of section 2(7) of the Consumer Protection Act,
2019, as he is using the tractor for commercial purposes. Whether Ramu will succeed in his case
? Refer to relevant provisions of law in support of your answer with reference to case law, if
any
Ans) According to Section 2(7) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, consumer means any person
who–
(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly
promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other
than the person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or partly paid or partly
promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such use is made with the approval of
such person, but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any
commercial purpose; or
(ii) hires or avails of any service for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly
paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary
of such service other than the person who hires or avails of the services for consideration paid or
promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when
such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person, but does not include
a person who avails of such service for any commercial purpose.
“Commercial Purpose” does not include use by a person of goods bought and used by him
exclusively for the purpose of earning his livelihood, by means of self-employment; the
expressions “buys any goods” and “hires or avails any services” includes offline or online
transactions through electronic means or by teleshopping or direct selling or multi-level
marketing.
In the case of Bhupendra Jang Bahadur Guna v. Regional Manager & Others, it was held that a
tractor purchased primarily to till the land of the purchaser and let out on hire during the idle
time to till the lands of others would not amount to commercial use.
In view of the provisions of Consumer Protection Act and decided case law stated above, Ramu is
a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and he can file the claim if there is any
defect in the tractor.
103
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
5) Raman borrows `5,000 from Boman and promises to pay `10,000, if he fails to pay on a
stipulated date. Is on Raman’s failure to repay on stipulated date, Boman is entitled to recover
10,000 from Raman ? Examine the validity of claim of stipulated damages.
Ans) Yes, claim can sustain if Court finds it reasonable.
Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, provides for reasonable compensation for breach of
contract where penalty is stipulated for.
When a contract has been broken, if a sum is named in the contract as the amount to be paid in
case of such breach, or if the contract contains any other stipulation by way of penalty, the party
complaining of the breach is entitled, whether or not actual damage or loss is proved to have
been caused thereby, to receive from the party who has broken the contract reasonable
compensation not exceeding the amount so named or, as the case may be, the penalty stipulated
for.
Illustration (a) A contracts with B to pay B Rs. 1,000, if he fails to pay B Rs. 500 on a given day. A
fails to pay B Rs. 500 on that day. B is entitled to recover from A such compensation, not
exceeding Rs. 1,000, as the Court considers reasonable
6) F, for natural love and affection, promises to give her daughter D `1,00,000. But after some
time F refuses to fullfil his promise. Advice D what she should do ?
Ans) Present problem relates to section 25 of the Contract Act, 1872, which lays a general rule that an
agreement made without consideration is void. Section 25 also lays down exception to this rule
which read as if an agreement is expressed in writing and registered and is made out of natural
love and affection between parties standing in a near relation of each other, the agreement is
valid and enforceable and requires no consideration.
Though in the present problem F promises to give her daughter `1,00,000 out of natural love and
affection and the parties are standing in near relation to each other but his promise is not in
writing and registered, so daughter D is not entitled to get the promise by her father enforced i.e.
Oral promise without consideration is not legally enforceable under the given exception, so it is
advised to D that she is not entitled to get the promise of her father enforced in the court of law.
104
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
7) A is the tenant of B. A asks B to clean, repair and maintain the building. B refuses. There is no
provision in the lease agreement in respect of cleaning, repairing and maintaining the building.
However ‘A’ files a claim against ‘B’ under Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Decide referring the
relevant provisions of law
Ans) The present problem relates to Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Issue involved in the question is
whether A is the consumer or not. A files for relief under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 in
view of the definition of “Consumer” given in the Act.
According to Section 2(7)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer means any person
who hires or avails of any service for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly
paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary
of such service other than the person who hires or avails of the services for consideration paid or
promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when
such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person, but does not include
a person who avails of such service for any commercial purpose.
Further, in Laxmiben Laxmichand Shah v. Sakerben Kanji Chandan and others, the Supreme Court
held that the tenant entering into lease agreement with the landlord cannot be considered as
consumer under the Consumer Protection Act. Where there was no provision in the lease
agreement in respect of cleaning, repairing and maintaining the building, the rent paid by tenant
is not the consideration for availing these services and therefore, no question of deficiency in
service.
Therefore, going by the above judgement and definition of consumer in the Consumer Protection
Act, 2019, A cannot be a consumer for services of cleaning, repairing and maintaining the building
which is not part of lease agreement and for which rent he is paying cannot be considered to be
consideration. If he is not consumer, there is no question of deficiency of service under the
Consumer Protection Act, 2019.
105
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
8) A gifts ` one lakh to B, reserving right to take back ` ten thousand out of that at his desire with
B’s assent. Decide the validity of this gift in the light of relevant provisions of law
Ans) This present problem relates to Transfer of Property Act, 1882. This involves an issue of validity
of gift. In this case, A gifts to B ` one lakh but with B’s assent, he reserves the right to get back `
ten thousand out of the entire amount of ` one lakh.
One of the essential characteristic of a gift is that it cannot be revoked at the will and pleasure of
the grantor. A revocable gift is one which may be revoked by the donor at any time. Its
revocation would depend upon the mere will or pleasure of the donor. Such a gift is void. But on
the other hand, if the condition is one which does not depend on the will or pleasure of the
donor, the gift can be revoked on the happening of such condition
Illustrations (b) A gives a lakh of rupees to B, reserving to himself with B’s assent the right to take
back at leisure Rs. 10,000 out of one lakh. The gift holds goods as to Rs. 90,000 but is void as to
Rs. 10,000 which continues to belong to A.
In view of the definition of gift contained under Section 122, the gift, in the case given in the
question, holds good as to Rs. 90,000 but is void as to Rs. 10,000 which continue to belong to A.
This is because, once a gift is made, it can’t be revoked at the will desire or pleasure of the Donor.
Since the gift of Rs. 10,000 solely depend at the desire of A, hence void and gift for rest Rs. 90,
000 shall be enforceable under the law
9) X and Y, buy 50 bales of cotton agreeing to divide these between them. Decide whether X and Y
are partners ? Support your answer in light of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.
Ans) This question relate to the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The issue involved in this problem is
whether X & Y are partners or not?
According to section 4 of the Act, “Partnership is the relation between person who have agreed
to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all.”
Therefore, to constitute a partnership, the parties must have agreed to carry on a business and to
share profits in common. “Profits” mean the excess of returns over advances, the excess of what
is obtained over the cost of obtaining it. It follows that the sharing of profits is an essential
ingredient of partnership.
In present problem X and Y buy 50 bales of cotton agreeing to divide bales between them.
So here the prima facie evidence of the existence of partnership i.e. sharing of profits is missing
hence in view of Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, X and Y are not partners.
106
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
10) Rishi (the insured) purchased two life insurance policies with premium payable quarterly from
ABC Insurance Company (the insurer). When the fifth premium became due, the agent of
insurer met the insured and took a bearer cheque towards the premium payable by the insured
in respect of the policies. The agent encashed the cheque immediately, but the amount of
premimum was not deposited by the agent for another four months. In the meanwhile, the
insured met with a fatal accident and died. The claim of widow of the insured was repudiated
by the insurer on the ground that the policies had lapsed on account of nonpayment of the
premium. Whether the claim of the widow may be recovered from the insurer ? Decide
Ans) The present case is similar to the case of Harshad J. Shah v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
[1997(3) SCALE 423 (SC)]. In this case Supreme Court held that the agent had no express
authority to receive the premium on behalf of the Corporation. In his letter of appointment there
was a condition expressly prohibiting him from collecting the premium. Nor could it be said that
he had an implied authority to collect the premium, as regulation 8(4) expressly prohibited the
agents from collecting premiums. Therefore, no case had been set up by the complainant before
the State Commission that the Corporation by its conduct had induced the policyholders,
including the insured, to believe that the agents were authorised to receive premiums on behalf
of the Corporation. Nor was there any material on record that lent support to this contention. In
the facts of this case there was no room to invoke the doctrine of apparent authority underlying
Section 237 of the Indian Contract Act when the LIC has been careful in making an express
provision in the Regulations/Rules, which are judicial in nature.
However, taking a humanitarian view of the tragedy faced by the claimants, Supreme Court
directed the LIC to refund the entire amount of premium paid to the LIC on the four insurance
policies along with interest.
When an agent has, without authority, done acts or incurred obligations to third persons on
behalf of his principal, the principal is bound by such acts or obligations, if he has by his words or
conduct induced such third persons to believe that such acts and obligations were within the
scope of the agent’s authority.”
Therefore, in the case with facts stated in question, Rishi’s (the insured) widow cannot claim any
amount from insurer on the ground of apparent authority except when it may be given on
humanitarian ground by the Court as was in Harshad J. Shah Case.
107
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
11) A contract for the sale of land has been entered into between Vishal and Akash. Akash, the
transferee, has paid the price entering into possession and is willing to carry out his contractual
obligations. As registration has not been effected Vishal, the transferor, seeks to evict Akash
from the land. Whether Vishal can do so ? Give reasons in support of your answer
Ans) Followings are the essential conditions for the operation of the doctrine of part performance
according to Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act.
1. There must be a contract to transfer immoveable property.
2. It must be for consideration.
3. The contract should be in writing and signed by the transferor himself or on his behalf.
4. The terms necessary to constitute the transfer must be ascertainable with reasonable certainty
from the contract itself.
5. The transferee should have taken the possession of the property in part performance of the
contract. In case he is already in possession, he must have continued in possession in part
performance of the contract and must have done something in furtherance of the contract.
6. The transferee must have fulfilled or be ready to fulfil his part of the obligation under the
contract.
If all the above mentioned conditions are satisfied, then, the transferor and the persons claiming
under him are debarred form exercising any right in relation to the property other than the rights
expressly provided by the terms of the contract notwithstanding the fact that the instrument of
transfer has not been registered or complete in the manner prescribed therefor by the law for
time being in force. It should be noted that Section 53A does not confer any positive right on the
transferee. It only prohibits exercise of the right of ownership in relation to the property in order
to evict the transferee from the property because legal requirements have not been satisfied.
In view of the above, Vishal (transferor) cannot evict Akash (transferee) from the land. Akash will
not be allowed to suffer simply because the formality of registration has not been through. The
legislature grants some relief to such a transferee under Section 53A, which embodies the
doctrine of part-performance.
108
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
12) Ms. Rubina was operated in General Hospital Nagpur, which was under control of the
Government of Maharashtra, free of charge for family planning i.e. tubectomy. Subsequently,
she gave birth to a female child. She filed a complaint against the State of Maharashtra and the
doctor, who performed the operation, claiming ` 2 lakh for negligence in performing the
operation. Rubina sought the relief of ` 2 lakh under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, stating
that the negligence of the doctor and the State of Maharashtra, being the controller of the
hospital may be treated as deficiency in the service. Decide, whether Rubina will succeed?
Ans) As per Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, Consumer means any person who hires or
avails of any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and
partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such
services other than the person who hires or avails of the services for consideration paid or
promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when
such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person but does not include
a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose.
The term ‘service’ is defined under Section 2(1)(o) of the Act as to mean service of any
description which is made available to potential users and includes, but not limited to the
provision of facilities in connection with banking, financing, insurance, transport, processing,
supply of electrical or other energy, board or lodging or both, housing construction,
entertainment, amusement or the purveying of news or other information, but not include the
rendering of any service free of charge or under a contract of personal service.
But in the instant case, the tubectomy is rendered free of charge which will not fall within the
ambit of the definition of “service” under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. For the same
reason, Rubina is not a consumer as per the provisions of the Act. Therefore, Rubina will not
succeed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
13) A puts M as apprentice to B, and gives a guarantee to B for his fidelity. B promises on his part
that he will, at least once a month, see M make up the cash. B omits to see this done as
promised and M embezzles. State whether A is liable to B under the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Ans) According to Section 139 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, if the creditor does any act which is
against the rights of the surety, or omits to do an act which his duty to the surety requires him to
do, and the eventual remedy of the surety himself against the principal debtor is thereby
impaired, the surety is discharged.
A puts M as apprentice to B, and gives a guarantee to B for M’s fidelity. B promises on his part
that he will, at least once a month, see M make up the cash. B omits to see this done as
promised, and M embezzles.
In the instant case B (creditor), himself fails to fulfil his duty to check M once in a month making
up cash. So, he being at fault can’t held A (surety) liable for embezzlement by M (principal
debtor). A (being surety) is not liable to B (being creditor) under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
14) A hot water bottle was bought by Shreya, who could not be expected to have special skill
knowledge with regard to hot water bottles, from a chemist, who sold such articles stating that
the bottle will not stand boiling water but was intended to hold hot water. While being used by
109
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
Shreya, the bottle bursted and injured her. Whether seller is responsible for damages ? Give
reasons in support of your answer
Ans) Ordinarily, in a contract of sale, there is no implied warranty or condition as to the quality or
fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied.
But there is an implied condition that the goods are reasonably fit for the purpose for which they
are required if:
(i) the buyer expressly or by implication makes known to the seller the particular purpose for
which the goods are required, so as to show that he relies on the seller’s skill and judgement, and
(ii) the goods are of a description which it is in the course of the seller’s business to supply
(whether he is the manufacturer or producer or not). There is no such condition if the goods are
bought under a patent or trade name.
In the case of Priest v. Last (1903) 2 K.B. 148, a hot water bottle was bought by the plaintiff, a
draper, who could not be expected to have special skill knowledge with regard to hot water
bottles, from a chemist, who sold such articles stating that the bottle will not stand boiling water
but was intended to hold hot water. While being used by the plaintiff’s wife, the bottle bursted
and injured her. Held, the seller was responsible for damages as the bottle was not fit for use as a
hot water bottle.
In view of the above, the seller was responsible for damages as the bottle was not fit for use as a
hot water bottle.
15) X gives to Y property worth only `5,000 and adds a condition that Y should sell property for
`75,000 and not below that amount, this condition will at once become invalid for no one will
buy the property which is only worth `5,000 for `75,000 Similarly X gives property to Y worth
`75,000 and stipulates that if Y wants to sell the property he should sell it to Z for `2,000. Decide
with help of case law whether it is an absolute restraint under law relating to Transfer of
Property Act, 1882
Ans) Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 says that when property is transferred, the
transferee should not be restrained absolutely from alienating the property. One may give
property to another subject to a condition, but the condition should not be one which absolutely
prevents the transferee from alienating the property. Such a condition, if provided is invalid.
In Trichinpoly Varthaga Sangum v. Shunmoga Sunderam, (1939) Madras 954, there was a
partition between a Hindu father and his five sons. The deed of partition provided that if any one
of the sons wanted to sell his share, he should not sell it to a stranger but to one of his brothers
who should have the option to buy for a sum not exceeding `1,000. It was held by the Court that
the condition absolutely prevented the son from selling the property to any one for good value.
In this case the market value of the property of the son was far greater than `1,000. Hence, the
condition was declared invalid and absolute restraint.
Coming to the factual matrix provided in the present case, the conditions stipulated therein are in
the nature of absolute restraint under the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
110
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
16) A shopkeeper sold a packet of pre-packed chillies which does not bear the declarations
required to be made by the manufacturers on pre-packaged commodities. Whether the
shopkeeper has committed any act punishable under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 ? Discuss
Ans) Section 18 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 states that no person shall manufacture, pack, sell,
import, distribute, deliver, offer, expose or possess for sale any pre-packaged commodity unless
such package is in such standard quantities or number and bears thereon such declarations and
particulars in such manner as may be prescribed. Any advertisement mentioning the retail sale
price of a pre-packaged commodity shall contain a declaration as to the net quantity or number
of the commodity contained in the package in such form and manner as may be prescribed.
Under section 36 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 whoever manufactures, packs, imports, sells,
distributes, delivers or otherwise transfers, offers, exposes or possesses for sale, or causes to be
sold, distributed, delivered or otherwise transferred, offered, exposed for sale any pre-packaged
commodity which does not conform to the declarations on the package as provided in the Act,
shall be punished with fine which may extend to twenty-five thousand rupees, for the second
offence, with fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees and for the subsequent offence,
with fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh
rupees or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with both.
Accordingly, the shopkeeper has sold pre packed chillies which do not bear the declarations
required to be made on pre-packaged commodities, the said shopkeeper has committed an act
punishable under Section 36 read with Section 18 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009
17) Amit’s son absconded. He sent Suresh, his servant in search of the boy. When Suresh had left,
Amit, by hand bills, offered to pay `5,001 to anyone finding his son. Suresh found the son and
after coming to know about the offer, claimed the amount. Examine the validity of claim raised
by Suresh
Ans) One of the cardinal principle of the Law of Contract is that an acceptance must be given within a
reasonable time and before the offer lapses or is revoked. An offer becomes irrevocable by
acceptance.
An acceptance never precedes an offer. There can be no acceptance of an offer which is not
communicated. Similarly, performance of conditions of an offer without the knowledge of the
specific offer, is no acceptance. Thus in Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt (1913), where a servant
brought the boy without knowing of the reward, he was held not entitled to reward because he
did not know about the offer.
In this case Suresh had no knowledge of the offer, so he will fail to claim the same.
111
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
18) ‘A’, an individual, by a transaction, purchased a house in the name of his wife. Consideration of
transaction was paid by ‘A’ out of his known sources. Government seized the house claiming it
to be a benami property. Decide, whether the action of the Government is justified ?
Ans) According to Section 2 (8) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 Benami Property
means any property which is the subject matter of a benami transaction and also includes the
proceeds from such property.
As per Section 2 (9)(A) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 “benami transaction”
means-a transaction or an arrangement—
(a) where a property is transferred to, or is held by, a person, and the consideration for such
property has been provided, or paid by, another person; and
(b) the property is held for the immediate or future benefit, direct or indirect, of the person who
has provided the consideration, except when the property is held by—
(iii) any person being an individual in the name of his spouse or in the name of any child of
such individual and the consideration for such property has been provided or paid out of the
known sources of the individual;
In the present case transaction falls in the category of Section 2 (9)(A)(b)(iii) of the Benami
Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 and is an exception to what constitutes Benami Transaction.
Therefore, the house purchased by A in the name of his wife known sources does not fall in the
Benami Transaction. So the action of seizure of the house by the Government is not justified.
19) A advertises in the newspaper that he will pay ` 1,000 to any one who brings to him his lost
son. B without knowing of this reward finds A’s lost son and restore him to A. Can B claim for
the reward under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Ans) According to Indian Contract Act, 1872, for a valid contract an acceptance never precedes an
offer. There can be no acceptance of an offer which is not communicated. Similarly, performance
of conditions of an offer without the knowledge of the specific offer, is no acceptance and
therefore does not result in a contract.
Thus, as held in the case of Lalman Shukla v.Gauri Dutt (1913), where a servant brought the boy
without knowing of the reward, he was held not entitled to reward because he did not know
about the offer and therefore could not have accepted it.
In this given case since B did not know of the reward, he cannot claim it from A even though he
finds A‘s lost son and brings him to A.
112
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
20) X draws a cheque in favour of Y, a minor, Y endorses the same in favour of Z. The cheque is
dishonoured by bank on grounds of inadequate funds. What legal remedy is available to Z
under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ?
Ans) Capacity to incur liability as a party to a negotiable instrument is co-extensive with capacity to
contract. According to Section 26 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, every person capable
of contracting according to law to which he is subject, may bind himself and be bound by making,
drawing, acceptance, endorsement, delivery and negotiation of a promissory note, bill of
exchange or cheque.
Negatively, minors, lunatics, idiots, drunken person and persons otherwise disqualified by their
personal law, do not incur any liability as parties to negotiable instruments. But incapacity of one
or more of the parties to a negotiable instrument in no way, diminishes the liabilities of the
competent parties to the said instrument. Therefore, where a minor is the endorser or payee of
an instrument which has been endorsed all the parties excepting the minor are liable in the event
of its dishonour.
In the given case Z can recover the amount of cheque from X who delivers the cheque in favour
of Y, a minor by resorting to the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
21) A and B are litigating in a count of law over property X and during the pendency of the suit, A
transfers the property X to C. The suit ends in B’s favour. Decide, who shall be entitled for
property X under the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ?
Ans) Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 incorporates the doctrine of Lis pendens. It
states that during the pendency of a suit in a Court of Law, property which is subject to the suit/
litigation cannot be transferred. When it is said that the property cannot be transferred what is
meant in this context is that property may be transferred but this transfer is subject to the rights
that are created by a Courts decree.
In the given case, A and B are litigating in a Court of law over property X and during the pendency
of the suit A transfers the property X to C. The suit ends in B’s favour. Here C who obtained the
property during the time of litigation cannot claim the property. He is bound by the decree of the
Court wherein B has been given the property.
113
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
22) doctor purchased woollen undergarments from S, a retailer shopkeeper whose business was to
sell goods of the description. But after wearing the undergarments, the doctor got developed
some skin disease. Can the doctor claim damages from S under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 ?
Decide
Ans) According to the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 in a contract of sale, there is no implied warranty or
condition as to the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied.
But there is an implied condition that the goods are reasonably fit for the purpose for which they
are required if:
(i) the buyer expressly or by implication makes known to the seller the particular purpose for
which the goods are required, so as to show that he relies on the seller's skill and judgement, and
(ii) the goods are of a description which it is in the course of the seller's business to supply
(whether he is the manufacturer or producer or not). There is no such condition if the goods are
bought under a patent or trade name.
In the case of Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills (1936) 70 MLJ 513, G a doctor purchased woollen
underpants from M, a retailer whose business was to sell goods of that description. After wearing
the underpants G developed some skin diseases. The Court held that the goods were not fit for
their only use and G was entitled to avoid the contract and claim damages.
In view of the above Doctor can claim damages from S under Sale of Goods Act, 1930.
23) Avanti, took out motor car insurance from Healthy Trip Insurance Company. A cheque was
issued under a contract of insurance of motorcar by the insured for the payment of premium of
the policy. However, the cheque was dishonoured for want of funds in the account. Meanwhile
the car met with an accident and badly damaged, killing the insured owner. The claim for
insured amount was repudiated by the company.
Decide :
(i) Whether the contract of insurance has been performed ? Analyse the provisions of the
Indian Contract Act, 1872 in this respect ?
(ii) Whether the claim of the insured amount may be recovered from Healthy Trip Insurance
Company ?
Ans) The fact in given case are similar to the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Seema Malhotra
[2001(2) SCALE 140]. In this case the Supreme Court held that applying the principles envisaged
under Section 51, 52 and 54 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 relating to reciprocal promises, insurer
need not to perform his part of promise when the other party fails to perform his part and thus
not liable to pay the insured amount.
When the insured fails to pay the premium promised, or when the cheque issued by him towards
the premium is returned dishonoured by the bank concerned the insurer need not perform his
part of the promise. The corollary is that the insured cannot claim performance from the insurer
in such a situation. The contract of insurance therefore cannot be said to have been performed.
Therefore, the claim of the insured amount from the Healthy Trip Insurance Company can not be
recovered.
114
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
24) Ram employed in Mumbai promised to pay `8,000 per month to his wife Sunita. She was living
in Delhi. On receiving information that she has become unfaithful to him, Ram stopped the
payment of `8,000 to Sunita. Sunita approaches to file a case against Ram. Advise her with
reference to the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Ans) According to section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, Contract is an agreement enforceable
by law i.e. for an agreement to become a contract, there must be intention to create legal
relationship.
In the present case, intention to create legal relationship is absent as this is a domestic
arrangement between husband and wife. According to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, it does not
make any difference whether the agreement is oral or in writing. So being domestic arrangement
between husband and wife, it is presumed that intention to create legal relationship is absent in
the present case and therefore, this agreement is not enforceable. Therefore, Sunita would not
succeed in the present case. (Ref. Balfour v. Balfour)
25) Rajni got herself operated in the Devashri Hospital for removal of her uterus, as a cyst was
found to have developed near one of her ovaries. The surgeon, who performed the operation,
left abdominal pack in the abdominal. This caused lot of pain, suffering and uneasiness to her.
The abdominal pack was subsequently removed by another surgical operation. It was alleged
that due to negligence of the surgeon, the patient suffered all the consequences, therefore it
should be treated as negligence in the treatment. But the Hospital authorities contended that
the patient’s problem was removed by the second operation, hence it is not deficiency. Rajni
sought the relief under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 stating that this negligence may be
treated as deficiency and compensation may be paid to her. Decide whether Ranji will succeed
or not ? Why ?
Ans) According to section 2(1)(g) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, “Deficiency” means any fault,
imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance
which is required to be maintained by or under any law for the time being in force or has been
undertaken to be performed by a person in pursuance of a contract or otherwise in relation to
any service.
The principles, laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Kusum Sharma & Others versus Batra
Hospital & Medical Research Centre & Others Supreme Court (CP), shall be kept in view while
deciding the cases of medical negligence. As long as the doctors have performed their duties and
exercised an ordinary degree of professional skill and competence, they cannot be held guilty of
medical negligence.
In the present case the doctor is liable for medical negligence as by leaving abdominal pack in the
abdomen, his conduct fell below that of the standards of a reasonably competent practitioner in
his field. The doctor has breached all the above stated principles. Therefore, he is liable for
medical negligence.
Rajni will succeed in this case and will be entitled for compensation.
115
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
26) A draws and B accepts the bill payable to C or order. C endorses the bill to D and D to E, who is
‘holder in due course’. Decide from whom E can recover the amount under the Negotiable
Instrument Act, 1881
Ans) According to the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, every prior party to a negotiable instrument is
liable thereon to a holder in due course until the instrument is duly satisfied. Prior parties may
include the maker or drawer, the acceptor and all the intervening endorsers to a negotiable
instrument. The liability of the prior parties to a holder in due course is joint and several.
The holder in due course may hold any or all prior parties liable for the amount of the
dishonoured instrument. Therefore, in present case, “E” can recover the amount payable on bill
from: (i) “A” being drawer of bill having secondary and conditional liability arising in case of
dishonor of bill. (ii) “B” being drawee and acceptor of bill having primary and absolute liability to
pay bill. (iii) “C” and “D” being endorsers and prior parties to the bill
27) Sachin made an unconditional gift of property to Amit but continued in possession of gifted
property. Sachin revoked the gift deed transferred it to Naresh. Amit wants to recover
possession from Naresh. Discuss it in the light of provisions of Transfer of Property Act, 1882
whether Naresh can withhold the gifted property?
Ans) According to Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, once a gift is accepted by the donee/his
legal representatives during life time of donor, the donor cannot revoke it.
One of the essential feature of gift is that it cannot be revoked at the will and pleasure of the
grantor. A gift which comes into existence on the fulfilment of a condition, that is to say, a gift
which is subject to a condition precedent is also valid.
But in this case, as gift is unconditional, therefore, after its acceptance, Sachin cannot revoke gift
deed.
Applying section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act dealing with transfer by ostensible owner, in
present case, Sachin (donor) is not ostensible owner as he is not holding the property with the
consent of Amit (real owner). Therefore, Naresh (transferee), cannot, invoke the protection of
Section 41. Amit would succeed in the case and Naresh cannot withhold the gifted property
116
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
28) A minor fraudulently overstated his age and purchased a motor car after executing a
promissory note in favour of the owner of the motor car for its price. The car owner compelled
the minor to pay the amount of the promissory note. Whether the car owner will succeed ?
Examine it with reference to Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Specific Relief Act, 1963.
Ans) According to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, a minor has no capacity to contract and minor's
contract is absolutely void. Law of estoppel is not applicable to a minor and he can always plead
his minority and is not estopped from doing so even where he had produced a loan or entered
into some other contract by falsely representing that he was of full age, when in reality he was a
minor.
But where the loan was obtained by fraudulent representation by the minor or some property
was sold by him and the transactions are set aside as being void, the Court on equitable grounds
may direct the minor to restore the property to the other party.
According to Section 33 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 the Court may, if the minor has received
any benefit under the agreement from the other party require him to restore, so far as may be
such benefit to the other party, to the extent to which he or his estate has been benefited
thereby.
In present case, car owner will not succeed in getting the amount of promissory note but he can
get back his motor car
29) A contract for the sale of land has been entered into between A and B. The transferee has paid
the price entering into possession and is willing to carry out his contractual obligations. As
registration has not been effected, A the transferor, seeks to evict B from the land. Can he do
so ? Explain.
Ans) No, B will not suffer simply because the formality of registration has not been through. The
legislature grants some relief to such a transferee under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property
Act, 1882, which embodies the doctrine of part-performance.
Followings are the essential conditions for the operation of the doctrine of part performance
according to Section 53A.
1. There must be a contract to transfer immoveable property.
2. It must be for consideration.
3. The contract should be in writing and signed by the transferor himself or on his behalf.
4. The terms necessary to constitute the transfer must be ascertainable with reasonable certainty
from the contract itself.
5. The transferee should have taken the possession of the property in part performance of the
contract. In case he is already in possession, he must have continued in possession in part
performance of the contract and must have done something in furtherance of the contract.
6. The transferee must have fulfilled or be ready to fulfill his part of the obligation under the
contract.
If all the above mentioned conditions are satisfied, then the transferor and the persons claiming
under him are debarred form exercising any right in relation to the property other than the rights
expressly provided by the terms of the contract notwithstanding the fact that the instrument of
transfer has not been registered or complete in the manner prescribed therefor by the law for
time being in force
117
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
30) The complainant booked a ticket from Delhi to New York by a KLM plane. The airport
authorities in New Delhi did not find any fault in his visa and other documents. However, at
Amsterdam, the airport authorities instituted proceedings of verification because of which the
appellant missed his flight to New York. After reaching New York, the airlines tendered apology
to the appellant for the inconvenience and paid as a goodwill gesture a sum of `2,500. The
appellant made a complaint to the National Commission under the Consumer Protection Act,
1986. Whether the complainant will succeed ? Give reasons with the help of decided case law
Ans) The complainant will not succeed.
The present case is similar to the case of Ravneet Singh Bagga v. KLM Royal Dutch Fintimes
[1999(7) SCALE 43]. In this case the Supreme Court held that the respondent could not be held to
be guilty of deficiency in service. The staff of the airline acted fairly and in a bona fide manner,
keeping in mind security and safety of passengers and the Aircraft. The photograph on visa
documents was a photo copy and not the original which was unusual. In the circumstances, the
staff took some time to ascertain the truth and helped the appellant to reach New York the same
day.
31) A contracts to sell B a piece of land consisting of 100 bighas. It turns out that 98 bighas of the
land belongs to A and the two remaining bighas to a stranger, who refuses to part with them. B
files the suit for specific performance against A. Decide with the help of the legal provisions,
whether the specific performance suit is maintainable
Ans) Section 12(2) of the Specific Relief Act,1963 provides that where a party to a contract is unable to
perform the whole of his part, but the part which must be left unperformed by only a small
proportion to the whole in value and admit compensation in money, the Court may, at the suit of
the either party, direct the specific performance of so much of the contract as can be performed
and award compensation in money for the deficiency.
A contracts to sell B a piece of land consisting of100 bighas. It turns out that 98 bighas of the land
belongs to A and the two remaining bighas to a stranger, who refuses to join with them. The two
bighas are not necessary for the use of enjoyment of the 98 bighas, nor so important for such use
or enjoyment that the loss of them may not be make good in money. A may be directed at the
suit of B to convey to B, the 98 bighas and to make compensation to him for not conveying the
two remaining bighas; B may be directed at the suit of A, to pay to A, on receiving the
conveyance and possession of the land, the stipulated purchase money less the sum awarded as
compensation for the deficiency.
32) The ABZ company offered by an advertisement, a reward of `1,000 to anyone who contacted
influenza after using smoke ball in the specified manner. Amita used the smoke ball in the
specified manner, but was attacked by influenza. She filed the suit against ABZ company and
claimed the reward. Decide whether the suit is maintainable
Ans) The communication of the offer may be general or specific. Where an offer is made to a specific
person it is called specific offer and it can be accepted only by that person. But when an offer is
addressed to an uncertain body of individuals i.e. the world at large, it is a general offer and can
be accepted by any member of the general public by fulfilling the condition laid down in the
offer.
In the present case the suit is maintainable and Amita can claim the reward. Amita could recover
the reward as general offer can be accepted by anybody.
118
Prof Abhijeet C. Jaiswal
EBCL
33) Mohit finds a ring of Shardha and sells it to a third person Prachi who purchases it for value and
in good faith. Whether Shardha can file a suit to recover the ring? Advise with cogent reasons
Ans) Section 27 of the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 states about sale by person not the owner. According
to this section, subject to the provisions of this Act and of any other law for the time being in
force, where goods are sold by a person who is not the owner thereof and who does not sell
them under the authority or with the consent of the owner, the buyer acquires no better title to
the goods than the seller had, unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from
denying the sellers authority to sell.
The general rule is that only the owner of goods can sell the goods. Conversely, the sale of an
article by a person who is not or who has not the authority of the owner, gives no title to the
buyer. The rule is expressed by the maxim; “Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet” i.e. no one can pass a
better title than he himself has. As applied to the sale of goods, the rule means that a seller of
goods cannot give a better title to the buyer than he himself possess.
In the present case the true owner, i.e. Shradha can file a suit to recover ring from Prachi. Mohit
having no title to the ring could pass none the better title
119