Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study To Nalyze Organizational Climate of Life Insurance Corporation
A Study To Nalyze Organizational Climate of Life Insurance Corporation
ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 01, January 2019, Page 281-284
I. INTRODUCTION
Employees are the lifeline of any organization, as oxygen is very necessary for every human being,
similarly employees seems to be a vital organ for the smooth functioning in the organization. It is the only
human being who is responsible for the gaining of said objectives and goals as well as growth of the
organization. They are necessary to develop proper suitable environment in which all will work with sincerity
and dedication. Moreover the growth of an employee is the achievement of the organization and their failure is
the failure of the organization (Sacher, 2007, p.12) 1.
In the words of Joe Kelly, “climate may be thought of as the perception of the characteristics of the
organization”. Climate of an organization convey the message of work environment through the employees’
behaviour in terms of their performance. Climate of an organization is to be viewed as total system in the
organization whereas there may be some differences among different departments in the organization
(Brahmaiah, 2010)2. Various studies relate the climate to the acceptance of the organisation as a social system
because organizations are consist social values in the organization. It can also be seen as the state of good
relationships, trust and understanding among the members of the particular organisation. Therefore,
Organisational climate is characterised by the nature of internal policies, standards, values, ethics, relationships
and many more. Relationships does not only mean to the senior-subordinates relationships but also determined
by the interactions among goals and objectives of the organization, the organizational structure, the leadership
style, communication system, the procedure, the management and the behaviour of employees with each other
(Kamaraj, 1998)3.
Definitions
Table 1: Some Definitions of Organizational Climate are as follows:
AUTHORS YEAR DEFINITIONS
Forehand and 1964 Organizational climate is defined as a ”set of attributes and
Gilmer4 properties that (a) describe the organization and distinguish it
from other organizations, (b) are relatively enduring over time
and (c) affect the behaviour of employees in the organization”.
Litwin and 1968 Organizational climate is defined “a set of measurable attributes
Stringer5 of the work environment, perceived directly or indirectly by the
people who live and work in that environment, which influences
workers’ motivation and behaviour”.
Friendlander6 1969 Organizational climate may be defined ‘’as a relatively stable or
and Margulies on-going property of the organization which may release,
channel, facilitate or constrain an organization’s resources as
well as human resources”.
Baumgartel7 1971 Organizational climate may be defined as “a product of
managers’ practices, communication practices, and enduring and
systematic characteristics of the working relationship among
persons and divisions of any particular organization”.
(Source: Literature Review from numerous journals, articles and research papers).
On the basis of the above definitions and review of literature following characteristics are as following;
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Kirti and Nisha Pawaria, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,
ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 01, January 2019, Page 281-284
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Kirti and Nisha Pawaria, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,
ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 01, January 2019, Page 281-284
N= total no. of respondents for each statement; X= mean value of each statement
S.D= standard deviation
Responses for each statement are measured on the 5 point Likert- Scale;
SA= strongly agree; A= agree; N= neutral; DA= disagree; SDA= strongly disagree
(ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE)
Table2: Responses of LIC employees with respect to organizational climate
S. STATEMENTS N X S.D SA A N D SDA
N
O.
1. It is always easy to know 110 1.65 0.88 60 36 6 8 0
that who has the authority (54.5%) (32.7%) (5.5%) (7.3%)
to take some of the
decisions in this
organization.
2. There is good atmosphere 110 1.76 0.72 39 62 7 0 2
in this organization. (35.5%) (56.3%) (6.4%) (1.8%)
3. Appropriate rules and 110 1.90 0.80 38 47 22 0 3
regulation are set by the (34.5%) (42.7%) (20.1%) (2.7%)
organization.
4. The philosophy of the 110 2.22 1.19 32 44 21 7 6
organization promotes self- (29.1%) (40%) (19.1%) (6.4%) (5.5%)
problem solving capability
of the employees.
5. Adequate information 110 1.95 0.72 30 56 23 0 1
regarding policies/ (27.3%) (50.9%) (20.9%) (0.9%)
programs and other issues
are provided to all
employees at the right time.
6. Relationship between 110 1.86 0.74 38 50 21 1 0
seniors and their (34.5%) (45.5%) (19.1%) (0.9%)
subordinates in our
organization is warm and
friendly.
7. Seniors initiate risk in 110 2.02 0.95 37 42 24 5 2
welcoming innovative ideas (33.6%) (38.2%) (21.8%) (4.5%) (1.8%)
of subordinates.
8. Seniors always encourage 110 2.18 0.92 24 56 16 14 0
their subordinates to think (21.8%) (50.9%) (14.5%) (12.7%)
about their development.
9. There is no excessive 110 2.21 0.98 26 49 23 9 3
pressure in the organization. (23.6%) (44.5%) (20.9%) (8.2%) (2.7%)
10. We get feedback from 110 2.16 0.92 28 47 24 11 0
leaders regarding our (25.5%) (42.7%) (21.8%) (10.0%)
performance time to time.
11. Employees are always 110 2.10 0.90 32 41 30 7 0
ready to work for their (29.1%) (37.3%) (27.3%) (6.4%)
seniors.
12. There is also a system of 110 2.14 0.91 31 40 31 8 0
informal interaction among (28.2%) (36.4%) (28.2%) (7.3%)
employees regarding
working of the
organization.
13. Employees here are 110 2.19 0.99 29 44 28 5 4
generally support to each (26.4%) (40.0%) (25.5%) (4.5%) (3.6%)
other.
14. Job performance of 110 2.14 0.98 36 32 32 10 0
employees is rewarded as (32.7%) (29.1%) (29.1%) (9.1%)
their promotion.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Kirti and Nisha Pawaria, International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences,
ISSN 2250-0588, Impact Factor: 6.565, Volume 09 Issue 01, January 2019, Page 281-284
VI. REFRENCES
[1] Sacher, A. (2007). Influence of organization climate on managerial effectiveness in pharma industry. Ph.D thesis, University HNB Garhwal.
[2] Brahmaiah, C. (2010). An empirical study on organizational climate and job satisfaction in TTD. Ph.D thesis, Sri Venkaeswara University,
Tirupati.
[3] Kamaraj, S.P. (1998). A study on organizational climate, job involvement, job anxiety and job alienation of bank employees. Ph.D thesis, Bharathir
university, Coimbatore.
[4] Forehand, G.A. & Gilmer, B. (1964). Environmental variation in studies of organizational behaviour. Psychological Bulletin, 62 (6), 361-382.
[5] Litwin, G.H. & Stringer, R.A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration,
Harvard University, Boston, MA.
[6] Friedlander, F. & Margulies, N. (1969). Multiple impacts of organisational climate and individual values systems upon job satisfaction. Personnel
Psychology, 55, 287-295.
[7] Baumgartel, H. (1971). The penetration of modern management technology and organisational practices in Indian business organisations. Indian
Administrative and Management Review, 3.
[8] Batlis, N. (1980). The effect of organizational climate on job satisfaction, anxiety and propensity to leave. Journal of Psychology, 104, 233-246.
[9] Gani, A., & Shah, F.A. (2001). Correlates of organisational climate in banking industry. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(3), 301-322.
[10] Joshi, R.J., & Sharma, B.R. (1997). Determinants of managerial job satisfaction in a private organisation. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations,
33(1), 48-67.
[11] Newman, J.E. (1977). Development of a measure of perceived work environment (PWE). The Academy of Management Journal, 20(4), 520-534.
[12] Sharma, B.R., Srivastava, V.N., Nlngthoujam, S. (2012). Job involvement as a key component of work motivation: Search for Predictors. The Indian
Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(2), 325-340.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License