Ms. Carol used a communicative approach to teach students phrases of agreement and disagreement. She engaged students through carefully planned games and activities at their level. To start, she used an information gap activity to teach vocabulary and assess memory. Then she used language games to expose students to different sentence structures. Finally, she used role plays to allow students to communicate and write dialogues in context to have more realistic conversations. The teacher varied activities to keep students engaged and avoid boredom.
Ms. Carol used a communicative approach to teach students phrases of agreement and disagreement. She engaged students through carefully planned games and activities at their level. To start, she used an information gap activity to teach vocabulary and assess memory. Then she used language games to expose students to different sentence structures. Finally, she used role plays to allow students to communicate and write dialogues in context to have more realistic conversations. The teacher varied activities to keep students engaged and avoid boredom.
Ms. Carol used a communicative approach to teach students phrases of agreement and disagreement. She engaged students through carefully planned games and activities at their level. To start, she used an information gap activity to teach vocabulary and assess memory. Then she used language games to expose students to different sentence structures. Finally, she used role plays to allow students to communicate and write dialogues in context to have more realistic conversations. The teacher varied activities to keep students engaged and avoid boredom.
Ms. Carol used a communicative approach to teach students phrases of agreement and disagreement. She engaged students through carefully planned games and activities at their level. To start, she used an information gap activity to teach vocabulary and assess memory. Then she used language games to expose students to different sentence structures. Finally, she used role plays to allow students to communicate and write dialogues in context to have more realistic conversations. The teacher varied activities to keep students engaged and avoid boredom.
It’s absolutely obvious that Ms. Carol used the communicative approach by focusing on the goal of using a language “communication”. The teacher used multiple ways to use specific phrases (agreement and disagreement) and put their teaching into particular communicative situations, in order to help students learn to communicate better. The teacher used carefully planned games and activities at the level. When things are given to students at the correct level, it truly engages them and help them want to learn. In the next paragraph I will mention the techniques she used to achieve these goals. At the beginning, the teacher used an information gap activity to make sure students understand and memorize the words of this level. Not only the meaning of these words but also the spelling. She assessed their memory learning by asking them to recall the definitions they’ve learned during the activity she designed. Then she moved smoothly to another activity using the language games technique by offering them a variety of sentences that has different structures of agreement and disagreement. She exposed them to a dialogue to extract more agreement and disagreement expressions, stressing on how to disagree politely. At the end, she used the role play technique to allow the students communicate with each other in the given context. She encouraged all the students to write the dialogue to make sure they all participated. She also motivated them to not only show their agreement or disagreement but also give a comment to help them go on a conversation to make it more realistic. It was definitely professional when the teacher gave the students the chance to move around the campus then come back again pretending it is a new day to continue their activity, the matter that helps change their mood and avoid boredom.