Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment #5
Assignment #5
2. What is the standardized unit that measures resource use and waste?
-The standardized unit that measures resource use and waste is global hectares.
Measurement unit which makes data and results globally comparable.
5. According to the majority of middle-and high-income countries, what puts the planet
and society at risk?
-According to the most recent consumer study, around 70% of people in middle and
high-income countries feel that excessive consumption endangers the environment and
society. Another majority, like these, think that individuals should try to buy and possess
small, and that doing so would never compromise people's happiness.
6. How many hectares should each of us consume annually based on the resources available
on the planet?
-According to current estimations, our globe barely has enough resources to support a
yearly consumption of 1.8 "global hectares" for each of us. The term "global hectares" refers
to the standard unit of measurement for monitoring resource use and waste. A person in
Ghana or Guatemala consumes around this amount of food each day. For example, the
average consumption in the United States and Canada is around 8 hectares per person, but
in Europe it is only approximately 4.7 hectares per person, well beyond their fair share.
7. In this article, what are the two items about the quality of life?
-Life expectancy and happiness are the indicators of quality life given in the article.
8. What crisis on the planet would force us to slow down if we do not do so voluntarily?
- If we do not slow down willingly, climate change will push us to do so. We can't keep
ignoring nature's rules. If we do not act quickly, all of our hard-won gains against poverty will
be lost when the food system collapses and mass hunger reemerges to levels not seen
since the nineteenth century.
9. According to Dr. Jason Hickel, what must be done instead of urging developing
countries to 'catch up" with rich ones?
-We must consider how to get rich nations to "catch down" to more suitable levels of
development. We should look at societies where people live long and healthy lives while
earning and consuming at relatively modest rates, not as basket cases that need to be
converted into Western models, but as instances of efficient living.
10. How would the different areas of the world react to the idea of de-development?
-The concept of a rich country "growing" may be a strong rallying cry in the global south, but
it will be tough to sell to Westerners. It's difficult but not impossible since, according to
recent market polls, 70% of people in medium and high-income nations believe that
excessive consumption endangers the planet and culture. They also believe that we should
aim to purchase and own, and that doing so will not compromise our chances of success.
Activity 2. In this part, you are once again required to explain your
answer thoroughly on the questions below:
1. Why must we change our Paradigm of Growth and consumption to that of"
dedevelopment?
-We must end poverty by changing the rules of the global economy," says Jason Hickel.
There are still poor nations attempting to catch up, but Hickel believes that instead of
poor countries attempting to 'catch up' with rich countries, we should encourage rich
countries to 'catch down.' We should consider strategies for rich countries to catch up
with impoverished countries in order to achieve more acceptable levels of development.
We should look at cultures where individuals live long and happy lives while earning and
consuming relatively little.
5. What are the similarities and differences between Heidegger’s The Question
Concerning Technology and Hickel’s article?
- It's unclear which specific article by Hickel is being referred to, so I will provide a
general comparison between Martin Heidegger's essay "The Question Concerning
Technology" and the work of Jason Hickel, a scholar known for his critiques of capitalism
and economic growth.
Similarities:
Both Heidegger and Hickel share concerns about the impact of technology on human
existence and the environment. They argue that modern technology is not neutral, but
shapes our understanding of the world and our relationship with nature.
Both authors critique the dominant paradigm of progress and growth, which they see as
unsustainable and destructive.
Differences:
Heidegger's essay is more abstract and philosophical, while Hickel's work is more
empirical and grounded in economic and social analysis.
Heidegger's critique of technology is more focused on its impact on human existence,
while Hickel's critique is more concerned with its impact on social and environmental
justice.
Activity 3. Clearly, Hickel from his article showed us how progress and
development are equated with growth and higher consumption, which could
be the development indicator. In this portion of the unit, you require again
to give your synthesis, conclusions, or arguments relevant to the topic
presented. I will supply the first item, and you will continue the rest
5. Hickel argues that our current development models based on growth and higher
consumption are unsustainable and may exacerbate global inequalities and
environmental crises.