Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gandhism-Final 1683218212
Gandhism-Final 1683218212
Gandhism-Final 1683218212
Gandhism
Gandhism is the name of Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948), Indian social and moral philosopher.
His social and political thought is compendiously described as Gandhism. He didn't write any treatise
of his philosophy. His thoughts are scattered in a large number of notes and pamphlets as well in
his Autobiography (“ My Experiments with Truth”). He denied the existence of Gandhism. With
passing time the relevance of Gandhian thought is being in almost all walks of life. This proves that
Gandhism has not only its distinct identity, it is also a full fledged world view. That precisely forms
the basis of Gandhism.
According to Professor Humayun Kabir, Gandhi was not a philosopher but a strategist. More
than a philosopher, he was a psychologist. He understood mass psychology. Hence Gandhi emerged
as the most successful mass leader. There is a transition in Gandhi. Gandhi also moved towards
spirituality. From a master strategist, he became Mahatma. According to Bipin Chandra Gandhi was
a psychologist, a master strategist and an exceptional politician.
• Gandhi’s writings were produced, not in any academic setting, but in the midst of actual
political struggles by huge masses of people against racial discriminations, colonialism, economic
exploitation, untouchability and communalism.
• Gandhi led those struggles in South Africa (1893-1914) and India (1915-1948). He also
campaigned for them during several visits to England, where, incidentally, he had studied for
and passed the bar-at-law examination. He did some of his writing on his days of silence and
fasting and during several terms of imprisonment in South Africa and India.
Non-violence is also the pursuit of truth. It refers to abstinence from violence in one’s
behaviour towards other living beings. This is the negative side of nonviolence. On the positive side ,
it implies love for all. He advocated love for all including one’s haters. According to Gandhiji even the
intention of harming someone is equivalent to violence itself. He said that even the act of spreading
atmospheric pollution and damaging public health amounts to violence. Hence the principle of
violence embraces all rules of good citizenship and human decency.
Nonviolence is not the resort of the weak but rather the power of the strong. It has its genesis
in firm adherence to truth. Fight for Justice with firm faith in truth results in a change of heart of the
opponent. Hence spiritual force wins over physical force. Gandhi’s technique of struggle against the
mighty British empire was thoroughly based on the principle of nonviolence. This further gave rise to
methods like civil disobedience and satyagraha. His doctrines of trusteeship and vision of classless
society were also the manifestations of this adherence to truth and non-violence.
Views on religion
• He was genuinely a religious man. This standpoint shaped his political ideas, his economic ideas
and his view of society. However, the religious approach that he absorbed was significantly
different from the conventional view of religion. He accepted the inner oneness of all existence
in the cosmic spirit, and saw all living beings as representatives of the everlasting divine
reality.
• Gandhiji believed that man's ultimate goal in life was self- realisation. According to him, Self-
realisation meant seeing God face to face, i.e., realising the absolute truth or, knowing oneself.
He believed that it could not be attained unless man identified himself with the whole of
mankind. This necessarily involved participation in politics. He expressed his firm faith in the
spiritualization of politics.
• In his autobiography, Gandhiji stated that self-realisation required self-purification as its ethical
foundation. Men's moral life flows from such a search into this oneself and expresses itself in
outward activity of fellowship and concern to others. This moral outlook is a mainstay of
Gandhiji's political viewpoint. According to Gandhiji, the moral discipline of the individual is the
most important means of social construction.
• In Gandhi’s view the essence of all religions was identical. The God of Hindus is not different
from the God of Muslims. No religion was superior or inferior to others. Religious tolerance was
the keynote of social harmony. For him adherence to religion was a part of the pursuit of truth.
Views on Satyagraha:
Satyagraha is a means or strategy adopted by Gandhi in his struggles. It is formed from two
Sanskrit words that are Satya (truth) and Agraha (adherence). It is based on the foundational
principles of Gandhism.
1) Non-violence.
2) Ends and means.
Gandhi had first adopted this technique in South Africa. He defined satyagraha as the conflict
between good and evil. The Indian freedom struggle was not an ordinary struggle. It was a fight
between good and evil. The British state represented evil whereas the Indian represented good.
Devotion to truth is the essence of Gandhism. In Gandhi’s view, God and truth are inseparable.
Devotion to God can be carried out through devotion to his creation, particularly through the service
to the down-trodden.
Satyagraha is defined as a method of using soul force over brute force through self suffering, that
would secure the change in the heart of the opponent and would depart from the path of injustice.
He had employed both mass and individual Satyagraha.
Satyagraha is practised at two levels that is
• At the individual level that leads to moral upliftment
• At the political level that leads to Swaraj.
Aurobindo. Gandhi was in the habit of giving new meanings to the existing terms. According to
Gandhi, in passive resistance:
a) Person is not using violence because he thinks that the strategy of violence may not be
appropriate in a given context.
b) In passive resistance a person thinks the other person against whom passive resistance is
applied as his enemy.
But for a satyagrahi, non-violence is an act of faith; it is not a matter of choice. For satyagrahi,
there is no enemy – satyagraha is against the evil and not against the evil-doer.
According to Gandhiji, if someone becomes my enemy then the onus lies on the individual to
take the responsibility. Certain acts of the individual might have provoked the other person to turn
out into his enemy, hence the individual has to take the responsibility to solve the problem. Hence
satyagrahi has to make the sacrifice. Sacrifice is possible only when there is a feeling of love. It
means one should love his enemy only then one can follow satyagraha.
Satyagraha has a psychological effect on the opponent that makes him realise his fault. It is in
acquaintance with Leo Tolstoy’s method. Not only this, it also allows the opponent to put forward
his own viewpoint. It implies a paralegal method of registering a peaceful protest. Bhikhu Parekh has
identified three areas where Gandhi has used soul force over brute force. They are:
• Racial discriminiation in South Africa
• British rule in India
• Ugly social practices prevailing in India
Further Martin Luther King was inspired by the Satyagraha technique. In this respect he has
opined that “ Christ furnished the spirit and motivation , while Gandhi furnished the method “.
Satyagraha is the battle of good and evil and as a result ends and means have continuity.
Further satyagraha is the weapon of the strong and not the weak. Satyagraha was not to be
confused with weakness. He preferred to choose violence over cowardice .
Goal of Satyagraha
Gandhiji was a great politician. Hence, he preferred giving larger than life goals to whatever he
was doing. He elevated the spirit of freedom of freedom struggle by acquiring it the name of
satyagraha. It came to be fought under the veil of Dharma Yudh. His main purpose was to
communicate to the populace that as they were fighting for truth, so Indians are bound to win.
VIEWS ON SWARAJ
It is defined as the Indian version of liberty. Aurobindo Ghosh, was the first person to
interpret swaraj in terms of complete freedom from the foreign rule rather than dominion status.
Aurobindo also spiritualized the concept of swaraj. According to Aurobindo, the real meaning of
freedom is ‘inner freedom’, the realisation of the law of our being. The concept of freedom has to
be compatible with the peace and harmony in the society.
Gandhi’s swaraj is inspired by Aurobindo. Gandhi has further expanded its meaning. Gandhi’s
swaraj was also based on the ideas of Mundaka Upanishad. As per Upanishads swaraj implies ‘self-
control’ or ‘control on one’s desires’. Thus, for Gandhi, there is no real swaraj without ‘self
discipline’. Gandhi’s swaraj is also inspired by Leo Tolstoy, who held that the kingdom of God is
within you. It means man does not require any external control.
Thus, Gandhi’s swaraj was aimed at addressing problems of India and regeneration of India. It
was not just meant for the liberation of foreign rule. End of foreign rule was just the means and not
the end. End was to provide a life of dignity to the poor. This would ensure that circulation of elites
stopsand there is not just mere transfer of power from one set of rulers to another.
Being an anarchist Gandhiji looked at the state as a sign of weakness. Hence, he had
advocated Swaraj. At the individual level it refers to self-control ( western concept of freedom on
the other hand refers to the end of restriction). Swaraj is achieved only when man ends his
desire/passion and hence with the attainment of self-control, the need for any external regulator
like state also vanishes.
Bread Labour
It implies that every person should perform some form of physical labour, thus one can
understand the pain of others as well develop respect for manual labour.
Sarvodaya ideals are not practicable, though the ideals of sarvodaya will be noble. Nobody can find
fault with them, in the actual world. They will be found wanting. It will be almost impossible to
establish a society strictly on the basis of great principles by Mahatma Gandhi and others. Sarvodaya
doctrines are soaring and it is doubtful whether they can rest on the earth. The poor record of
Panchayat Raj in India bears testimony to the backward condition in which people are. In the
highly competitive world, one country can not succeed in having Ramrajya unless all states in the
world accept the Sarvodaya idea.
Doctrine of Trusteeship:
The doctrine urges landlords and capitalists not to consider themselves as sole proprietors of
their possession, but only as trustees of a gift bestowed upon them by God for the service of
humanity.
Gandhiji believed in simple living, at the level of production as well as consumption. He gave
primacy to simple technology over heavy industries. Simple technology had the capacity of mass
employment, whereas advanced technology would create vast unemployment, especially in a
country like India, and would promote consumerism with all its ill effects. Gandhiji preferred
‘production by the masses’ over ‘mass production’ by heavy industries.
Consumerism
A social outlook that tends to regard the consumption of goods and services as a great virtue and
a source of social prestige. Under its influence sublime values of life like self control, public
spiritedness, and artistic taste are relegated to the backseat.
However, Gandhiji realized that it was not feasible to switch over to the new system abruptly. The
existing system of large-scale production may be allowed to continue with necessary changes on the
attitude of the owners of means of production.
For the transformation of this relationship, he enunciated his doctrine of trusteeship. He realized
that the existing system had become oppressive because of moral decline. If the organisers of
agriculture and industry could be persuaded to act as public servants, they would win wide public
respect instead of existing hatred. However, critics point out that the vision of ‘change of heart’ of
the rich is a fascinating idea, but it is hardly realisable in actual practice.
individual. Like Aurobindo, Gandhi looks for balance, the balance between rights and duties, the
balance between individual and society. Gandhi is inspired by the philosophy of Nishkama Karma
found in the Gita.
The Gita suggests performing our duty and when we perform our duty, we automatically get
our rights. Rights and duties are neither antithetical nor independent of each other. When we fulfil
our obligations, we automatically get the rights. Thus, Gandhi’s theory of rights comes close to
Laski’s theory of rights and duties. (Functional theory of rights).
Views on State
Gandhi believes that state is antithetical to the idea of freedom. Gandhi is considered an
anarchist. Gandhi’s Ram Rajya is a stateless society that is based on the oceanic circles of power.
According to Gandhi, the state is a symbol of the weakness of man. Since man cannot control
himself, state is needed as an external control. But the state is a soulless machine that is
incompatible with the principle of ahimsa.
That is, Gandhi did not sacrifice the state for the sake of the individual. He also did not
support the atomistic view of man. He gave importance to human dignity and believed in the
coexistence of man.
VIEWS ON EDUCATION
Gandhi’s scheme on education is called ‘Nayee Taleem’. He suggests learning from book of life
rather than life from books. He focuses on vocational education that is the idea of ‘earn and learn’.
Like Plato, Gandhi believes education to be a lifelong experience and hence a person should be
capable of financing its education rather than depending on guardians or parents. Gandhi gave priority
to the learning subjects like social forestry, nursing, home science, handicrafts etc.
VIEWS ON WOMEN
Gandhi was of the opinion that women were superior to men in their moral and spiritual
strength. They had greater powers of self-sacrifice and suffering. On this account, women were
capable of infinite strength, which they only needed to realize and channelize it. Sita and Draupadi
were to be the ideals of woman in India.
Women had a key role to play in the family, in Gandhi’s opinion. The family was the crucible of
society where future citizens, leaders and lawgivers were nurtured. Hence, it was here that the
mother could mould the values and traits of her children in a direction that could lead to social
progress. The ultimate aim was to teach children to be self-reliant and not keep them dependent on
the family’s resources.
Gandhi had strong views on another key subject relating to women. This was the value of
equality between the sexes. He was definitely against gender bias in the training of children. He
asserted that girls ought not to be taught to adorn themselves as that identified them as objects of
desire without any other distinct human qualities.
Gandhi envisaged an important political role for women vis-à-vis the power structure in
society and the foundations of an equitable and non-violent social order.
honoured Hindu religion (sanatana dharma). He expressed his firm faith in the spiritualization of
politics. This means that politics is meant to be a blessing and not a curse to mankind. It is guided by
the highest ethical and spiritual principles. In other words politics should be guided by high moral
standards and not by expediency.
Continuity of ends and means: Gandhi believed in the continuity of ends and means. Only right
means should be adopted for the pursuit of right ends. He strongly refuted the idea that the end
justifies the means or that if a nobel end is achieved by adopting ignoble means , their use would be
excused.
Gandhi was convinced that if we take care of our means, the end will take care of itself.
Means and ends may be compared to the seed and tree respectively. The nature of the tree is
determined by the nature of the seed. Only the right type of seed will grow into the right type of
tree. Karma and phal (result)-the famous concepts used in Bhagwat Gita.
Means and ends are the two sides of a coin. They cannot be separated. Immoral means
cannot be used to achieve moral ends. If used, they will vitiate the end itself. Wrong may never
lead to the right destination. The authority founded on fear and coercion cannot inspire love and
respect among people. Gandhi adopted Satyagraha for achieving swaraj as the path was sacred as its
destination.
Regarding politics he believed that politics bereft of religion was nothing short of a death trap,
whichkills the soul. So Gandhiji wrote in his Autobiography
“My devotion to truth has drawn me into the field if politics, and I can say that without the
slightest hesitation and yet in all humility, that those who say that religion has nothing to do with
politics donot know what religion means”
In short politics and ethics were inseparable in the Gandhian system of thoughts.
Hoped that when non-violence is adopted Anticipated that after socialist revolution and the
as a universal principle, society will become fullest development of forces of production, ‘the
redundant state will wither away’
Vision of future society consists of self- Vision of the future consists of a self-regulated
discipline individuals having minimum society ruled by the principle -‘from each
needs with a sense of moral responsibility according to his ability, to each according to his
towards social needs needs.’
Sources
• IGNOU
• INDIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT : VR MEHTA
• INDIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT : O.P.GAUBA