Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Variable Reports ISSP 2003
Variable Reports ISSP 2003
Variable Reports ISSP 2003
Variable Report
Variable Report
The appendix usually contains two sorts of survey materials: the Study Descriptions and, if available, the
Characteristics of National Population, basic statistics for all the participating countries of the corresponding
module. The data for the annual ISSP modules are collected by independent institutions in each country. The
country data is integrated into one international data file, which is documented, distributed and long-term
archived by the ISSP Archive, institutionally, the GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences (Leibniz Institute for
the Social Sciences) in Cologne, Germany (http://www.gesis.org). In every second year from 1997 on, data and
documentation have predominantly been prepared by our partners at JDS/ ASEP in Spain
(http://www.jdsurvey.com).
Data access
Data for statistical analysis and related documentation are made available by the Data Catalogue
(http://www.gesis.org/en/services/research/data-catalogue/) or by ZACAT (http://zacat.gesis.org), the Data Online
Platform of GESIS. ZACAT additionally enables users to analyse data online. Access to the Data Catalogue and
ZACAT is free of charge, download of data sets requires registration.
Anonymised data
According to data regulations in participating countries, only anonymised data are made available. Each national
team is responsible for carefully checking the data in this respect before the deposit.
Usage requirements
To provide funding agencies with essential information about the use of archival resources and to facilitate the
exchange of information about related research activities, all users of ISSP data are requested to send
bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstracts to isspservice@gesis.org or if possible,
please directly send a copy of the publication to GESIS (GESIS-Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Dept.
Data Archive - ISSP, Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, D-50667 Cologne, Germany). Please also observe the general
notes on the usage regulations of GESIS Data Archive resources (http://www.gesis.org/en/services/data-
analysis/data-archive-service/usage-regulations/).
Disclaimer
Neither the original collector of the data, nor GESIS or JDS/ ASEP bears any responsibility for the use of ISSP data
or any data analyses.
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II I
As the surveys are designed for replication they offer both cross-national and cross-time comparison, creating
the base for a vast range of substantive and methodological research. Since there is no external fund agency,
ISSP members fund their own surveys. Beyond that, ISSP committee members fund ISSP central coordination,
networking, development of source questionnaires, or methodological work.
For more information on the ISSP in general, its working principles, contact addresses of ISSP members and
principal investigators, please visit the ISSP web site (http://www.issp.org).
GESIS – Variable Report 283 II
2.1.2 Title
International Social Survey Programme: National Identity II - ISSP 2003
Name Affiliation
ACSPRI Centre for Social Research (ACSR) Research School of Social Sciences Canberra, The Australian
Gibson, Rachel K.
National University, Australia
Haller, Max Institut für Soziologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
Hadler, Markus Institut für Soziologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
Hoellinger, Franz Institut für Soziologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
Dimova, Lilia Agency for Social Analyses (ASA), Sofia, Bulgaria
Pyman, Heather Carleton University Survey Centre, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Pammett, Jon H. Carleton University Survey Centre, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Mateju, Petr Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha, Czech Republic
Segovia, Carolina Centro de Estudios Públicos, Santiago, Chile
Andersen, Jørgen G. Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration, Aalborg University, Denmark
Andersen, Johannes Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration, Aalborg University, Denmark
Tobiasen, Mette Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration, Aalborg University, Denmark
Tanskanen, Eero Survey Research Unit, Statistics Finland, Finland
Borg, Sami FSD Finnish Social Science Data Archive University of Tampere, Finland
Blom, Raino University of Tampere, Finland
Melin, Harri University of Tampere, Finland
France-ISSP Association (Centre de Recherche en Economie et Statistique) Laboratoire de Sociologie
Lemel, Yannick
Quantitative, Malakoff, France
CIDSP (Centre d’Informatisation des Données Socio-Politiques) Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Grenoble,
Bréchon, Pierre
Domaine Universitaire, St. Martin D’Heres, France
CIDSP (Centre d’Informatisation des Données Socio-Politiques) Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Grenoble,
Cautres, Bruno
Domaine Universitaire, St. Martin D’Heres, France
Chauvel, Louis OFCE (Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Economiques), Paris, France
Forsé, Michel OFCE (Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Economiques), Paris, France
Degenne, Alain LASMAS (Laboratoire d’Analyse Secondaire et de Méthodes Appliquées en Sociologie), Paris, France
Harkness, Janet ZUMA, Mannheim, Germany
Mohler, Peter Ph. ZUMA, Mannheim, Germany
Scholz, Evi ZUMA, Mannheim, Germany
Klein, Sabine ZUMA, Mannheim, Germany
Park, Alison National Centre for Social Research, London, Great Britain
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II III
Jowell, Roger National Centre for Social Research, London, Great Britain
Örkény, Antal ELTE University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
Phadraig, Máire N.G. SSRC (Social Science Research Centre) University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Ward, Conor SSRC (Social Science Research Centre) University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Caithness, Philippa SSRC (Social Science Research Centre) University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Lewin-Epstein, Noah Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Yuchtman-Yaar,
Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Eppie
Aramaki, Hiroshi NHK, Broadcasting Culture Research Institute Public Opinion Research Division, Tokyo, Japan
Tabuns, Aivars Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Riga, Latvia
Tabuna, Ausma Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Riga, Latvia
Ganzeboom, Harry
Free University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
B.G.
Gendall, Philip Department of Marketing, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Skjak, Knut K. NSD (Norwegian Social Science Data Services), Bergen, Norway
Knutsen, Oddbjørn Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway
Mangahas, Mahar Quezon City, Philippines
Cichomski, Bogdan ISS (Institute for Social Studies), Warsaw University, Poland
Villaverde Cabral,
Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Manuel
Ramos, Alice Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
Khakhulina, Ludmila Levada Analytic Center, Moscow, Russia
Piscova, Magdalena Institute for Sociology, Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, Slovakia
Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of
Hafner-Fink, Mitja
Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Svallfors, Stefan Dept. of Sociology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
Edlund, Jonas Dept. of Sociology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
Rule, Stephen Human Science Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa
Seok, Hyunho Survey Research Center, Sungyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
García-Pardo,
CIS (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas), Madrid, Spain
Natalia
Díez-Nicolás, Juan ASEP (Análisis Sociológicos Económicos y Políticos), Madrid, Spain
SIDOS (Swiss Information and Data Archive for the Social Sciences), Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Fu, Yang-chih Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan
Departamento de Economia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo,
Ferre, Zuleika
Uruguay
Departamento de Economia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo,
Piani, Giorgina
Uruguay
Departamento de Economia, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo,
Rossi, Máximo
Uruguay
Smith, Tom W. National Opinion Research Center (NORC), Chicago, USA
Briceno-Leon,
LACSO (Laboratorio de Ciencias Sociales) Research School of Social Sciences, Caracas, Venezuela
oberto
GESIS – Variable Report 283 IV
How to cite the data: ISSP Research Group (2012): International Social Survey Programme: National Identity II -
ISSP 2003. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3910 Data file Version 2.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.11449
2.2 Content
2.2.1 Abstract
Questions on national consciousness and national identity.
Additional questions in EU states: Advantageousness of membership of the country in the EU; benefits from EU-
membership; attitude towards a powerful EU-government.
Demography: Sex; age; marital status; steady life-partner; years in school, current employment status; current
employment status of spouse; hours worked weekly; occupation of respondent and spouse (ISCO-88);
respondent and spouse working for private, public sector or self-employed; supervisor function; union
membership; household size; family income; respondents earnings; household composition; self-placement on a
left-right continuum; party preference; vote last election; religious denomination; frequency of church
attendance; self-placement on a top-bottom scale; region; town size, rural or urban region; ethnicity or
nationality.
(IE); Israel (IL); Japan (JP); Korea (South), Republic of (KR); Latvia (LV); Netherlands (NL); Norway (NO); New
Zealand (NZ); Philippines (PH); Poland (PL); Portugal (PT); Russian Federation (RU); Sweden (SE); Slovenia (SI);
Slovakia (SK); Taiwan (TW); United States (US); Uruguay (UY); Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of (VE); South Africa
(ZA)
2.4 Universe
18 years old (exclusions: Finland: 15; Japan, Netherlands, Russia and South Africa: 16; Sweden: 17) and older
Country (Region) ISO Fieldwork start/ end Fieldwork Institute Questionnaire- Sample Size
versions (n of cases)
Israel IL03-ar
IL03-ru
Japan JP Nov 03 – Dec 03 Central Research JP03 1102
Services, Inc., Japan
Korea (South) KR Jul 03 – Aug 03 Survey Research KR03 1315
Center at
Sungkyunkwan
University, South-
Korea
Latvia LV Dec 03 LV03-lv 1000
LV03-ru
Netherlands NL Dec 04 – Mar 05 Free University NL03/04 1823
Amsterdam,
Netherlands
New Zealand NZ Sep 03 – Nov 03 NZ03 1036
Norway NO Oct 03 – Dec 03 TNS Gallup, Norway NO03 1469
Philippines PH Mar 03 Social Weather PH03 1200
Stations, Philippines
Poland PL Jan 05 Public Opinion PL03 1277
Research Center
(CBOS), Warsaw,
Poland
Portugal PT Apr 04 – Sep 04 TNS-Euroteste, PT03 1602
Portugal
Russia RU Jul 03 Levada-Center, Russia RU03 2383
Slovak Republic SK Apr 04 – May 04 ASA, Bratislava, SK03-hu 1152
Slovak Republic SK03-sk
Slovenia SI Feb 03 – Mar 03 Public Opinion and SI03 1093
Mass Communication
Research Centre
(CJMMK), Ljubljana,
Slovenia
South Africa ZA Aug 03 – Oct 03 Human Sciences ZA03 2483
Research Council,
South-Africa
Spain ES Jun 03 ASEP, S.A., Spain ES03 1212
Sweden SE Feb 03 – Apr 03 SIFO, Sweden SE03 1186
Switzerland CH May 02 – Aug 03 Institut SIDOS, CH03-de 1037
Neuchâtel, CH03-fr
Switzerland CH03-it
Taiwan TW Oct 03 – Nov 03 Center for Survey TW03 2016
Research, Academia
Sinica, Taiwan
United States US Aug 04 – Dec 04 National Opinion US03 1216
Research Center
(NORC), USA
Uruguay UY Jul 04 – Aug 04 Department of UY03 1108
Economics – Faculty
of Social Sciences,
University of
Uruguay, Uruguay
Venezuela VE Mar 04 – Apr 04 Laboratorio de VE03 1199
Ciencias Sociales,
LACSO, Venezuela
Total Sample Size ∑ Feb 04 – Mar 05 45993
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II VII
All corresponding survey materials are provided in English, only the national questionnaires are available in the
national language(s) of each country.
Drafting group for the Basic Questionnaire on the National Identity Module 2003:
Over the past 30 years, there have been different Background Variable Standards:
The first set of background variables was established in 1985 with the first ISSP survey. Here countries agreed on
collecting the same demographic information. This list of variables underwent a revision in 2001, now providing a
coding frame for each background variable. It was valid until 2009.
In 2010 a new revision process of the ISSP Background Variables, planned for a three years period, started.
Beginning with the ISSP module 2010, this first revised version of the ISSP Background Variable Standard
concentrating mainly on variables containing work, occupational and partnership status information came into
effect. The second round of revisions, coming into effect in 2011, had its focus on the education variables, while
the last change is going to be made on the variable measuring ethnicity, effective with the module 2013. The
new standard is documented in some guidelines (different documents indicating the intermediate steps of
revision), providing detailed information and instructions on the variables measurement goals, coding frames,
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II IX
filters and possible question texts. Additionally, the question texts are summarised in a Master Questionnaire on
Background Variables.
Since 2004 countries document the post-harmonisation processes for each variable in a special documentation
template provided by the Archive. This template, always adjusted to the current standard, offers detailed country
specific information on administration, derivation, and coding of the ISSP Background Variables.
All relevant background variable documents are available under the following link:
http://www.gesis.org/en/issp/issp-members-area/coding-standards/
3.5 Where to find the survey materials and the data set of the ISSP Module of 2003 –
National Identity II
In the GESIS Data Catalogue on the GESIS web you find
http://info1.gesis.org/dbksearch19/SDesc2.asp?no=3910
The GESIS online data portal ZACAT also provides the integrated data file and further ISSP documentation
materials for download:
http://zacat.gesis.org/webview/index.jsp?object=http://zacat.gesis.org/obj/fStudy/ZA3910
Beyond this, ZACAT enables users to perform basic online analyses like frequency distributions, cross tabulations
or regressions.
GESIS – Variable Report 283 X
In order to uniquely identify a data set, to each data set version a GESIS Study No., a Version No., and a Digital
Object Identifier (doi) is assigned. The doi is linked to the Study Description in the Data Catalogue
(http://info1.gesis.org/dbksearch). Metadata filled in the Study Description of ISSP 2003 data and associated with
a doi are provided to the registration agency for social science data (da|ra).
Administrative variables are used for identifying data sets, respondents and countries (GESIS Data
Archive Study Number, Version Number, Respondent Number, Country Codes).
The GESIS Archive version variable includes the number of the data set and the respective release date,
composed as a string variable with three numbers:
- The major number is incremented when there are changes in the composition of the data set (e.g.
additional variables or cases).
- The minor or second number is incremented when significant errors have been fixed (e.g. coding
errors, misleading value labels).
-The third or revision number is incremented when minor bugs are fixed (e.g. spelling errors in variable
or value labels).
Country codes identify each case as belonging to one country. The country code variable, which was
used according to a scheme leaning on international automobile identification codes in the beginning
of the ISSP, was replaced by two country code variables based on the ISO Code 3166. One identifies
countries as a whole, the other one possible subsamples, such as East and West Germany. The cross
tabulations shown in this Variable Report are based on a third, alphanumerical country code variable,
which also identifies subsamples.
2. Substantial Variables
The substantial variables contain the mandatory module questions, often supplemented by optional
questions.
Variable labels provide keywords based on the question text; these keywords are applied consistently if
questions or question items are repeated over time. All substantial variables include the original
question number of the Basic Questionnaire in the variable labels.
Generally, all variable names consist of the standard prefix 'V' and the consecutive variable number
(beginning with the archive variables).
In the earlier ISSP modules, all variables are numbered consecutively, beginning with the archive
variables and followed by substantial and background variables. The last variable of each data set
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II XI
usually is the variable on weighting. Later on, the background variables start with V200 et seq..
Nowadays, these variable numbers are expressed by mnemonics with max. 8 characters (SEX, AGE, …).
Variables, which cannot be harmonised for various reasons, are usually presented as country specific
variables. As a rule, variable names of country specific variables have country abbreviations as prefixes.
In some of the older ISSP studies, the principle of country specific variables is not used. Instead all
country specific information is integrated into one variable. This Variable Report provides careful
documentation of country specific meanings and deviations.
5. Protocol Variables
There are two protocol variables in the latest ISSP modules. The first, 'MODE', indicates the mode of data
collection, while the second, 'SUBSCASE', indicates whether a respondent in the sample is an original
case or a replacement for an originally selected respondent who was not available. Former ISSP surveys
do not contain the SUBSCASE variable.
6. Weight
There is no weight available for the international comparison on the ISSP across countries.
Please note that also country subsamples can be over- respectively underrepresented without any
weighting factor correcting for the imbalance. This fact has to be taken into account if these countries
in question are analysed as one unit.
The ISSP background variables are already expressed by the current mnemonics (SEX, AGE, AT_DEGR …). The
variables on respondents’ income (RINCOME) and family income (INCOME) are not available as country specific
variables. However, the exact meaning of country specific income categories and midpoints are carefully
documented so long as they were provided by the principal investigators. Please note, that in some countries
personal income (RINCOME) and family income (INCOME) might differ slightly only because of different category
schemes in between these two variables which finally leads to deviating midpoints (e.g. Czech Republic or New
Zealand). Additionally, there are two compressed variables on occupation (ISCO88_1, SPIS88_1), that provide
main groups of the occupational codes of ISCO 1988.
After conducting the national surveys, all collaborators are supposed to deposit their data at the GESIS Data
Archive, where all the deposited data sets are prepared, integrated and merged into one single international data
set, which is finally published.
GESIS – Variable Report 283 XII
During the data preparation process all national data sets are successively controlled for completeness, missing
and duplicate records, for wild codes and for formal consistency of response patterns and question routing.
Moreover, national derivation processes from source to target codes in the background variables are controlled.
Missing values, especially due to filter instructions are checked and recoded where necessary. Errors, which are
discovered during these procedures, are corrected or documented in cooperation with primary investigators.
Complete machine-readable DDI-XML (see chapter 4.5) compliant documentation is created for all ISSP data sets
by GESIS.
GESIS adds 'Not applicable' (NAP) codes for questions that have filters. NAP indicates that only a subsample and
not all of the respondents were asked. Also in the case of country specific variables, all the other countries are
coded NAP.
GESIS adds 'Not available' (NAV) for variables which in single countries may not have been conducted for
whatever reason.
For occupation, official international occupation codes are used. While in the first years of the ISSP many
countries used country specific occupation codes, ISCO 1988 has been established as a standard over the years.
4.4 Weighting
Please note, that there is no total weight usable for international comparison. While all ISSP data sets contain a
weighting variable, the weights in this variable do not incorporate a common weighting scheme that can be
applied to all countries of the same ISSP module.
In the Study Description and/ or in the Background Variables Documentation of each country you will find more
detailed information on the kind of weights that are used. You can see, whether
‐ a design weight
‐ weights to adjust for non-response bias or
‐ a combination of these both weights above or
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II XIII
are applied. However, some countries dispense with weighting factors. If no weight is provided, the variable
“Weight” is coded to 1.0. Otherwise the weighting factor is unequal 1.0 (but greater than 0).
It may be advisable to weight data to increase representativeness in certain cases. For ISSP data we strongly
recommend consulting the National Study Descriptions for information on the certain weighting factor
composition and maybe even the Characteristics of National Population for more context information. An initial
overview of the national weighting procedures is provided in this Variable Report in chapter 6.
AT Austria JP Japan
BG Bulgaria LV Latvia
CA Canada NL Netherlands
CH Switzerland NO Norway
DK Denmark RU Russia
ES Spain SE Sweden
FI Finland SI Slovenia
FR France SK Slovakia
IE Ireland UY Uruguay
The example explained below (ISSP 2008) shows the information appearing in the variable documentation part of
a Variable Report for a typical substantial variable. Results are usually broken down by country or presented as
frequency counts in the case of country specific variables. In the case of variables with long lists of coded “real”
values (e.g. age) results are not shown.
The complete question and answer texts are taken from the final Basic Questionnaire as provided.
All deviations are documented in this Variable Report.
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II XV
As there is neither an international weighting factor nor a national weighting factor which would be comparable
for all participating countries, all frequencies and tables are calculated from unweighted data.
GESIS – Variable Report 283 XVI
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II XVII
6 Variable Documentation
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Variable, Label
Question Text (English Language)
V1
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
3910 GESIS Data Archive Study Number 45993 100.0 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 45993
page 1
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
This variable identifies the GESIS archive version number of this data set and the corresponding release date, recorded as a
string.
The version number is composed of a sequence of three numbers. The major number is incremented when there are changes
in the composition of the data set (e.g. additional variables or cases), the minor or second number is incremented when
significant errors have been fixed (e.g. coding errors, misleading value labels), and the third or revision number is incremented
when minor bugs are fixed (e.g. spelling errors in variable or value labels).
V2
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
2.1.0 (2012-10-18) 45993 100.0 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 45993
page 2
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V3 - Respondent Number
Respondent Identification Number
This number uniquely identifies each respondent. It is composed of two sections containing eight numbers in total. The first two
digits are identical with the country codes (01-43) of variable 'COUNTRY'. The digits following behind contain the original
identification number.
page 3
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
This variable holds the country codes for the participating countries. Since these country codes are a mere enumneration, the
codes/ values themselves do not contain ISO 3166 information. Although the country abreviations used in the value labels are
closely adjusted to ISO 3166. For more information regarding this ISO standard, please see variable C_ALPHAN.
1 Australia (AU)
2 Germany-West (DE-W)
3 Germany-East (DE-E)
4 Great Britain (GB-GBN)
6 United States (US)
7 Austria (AT)
8 Hungary (HU)
10 Ireland (IE)
11 Netherlands (NL)
12 Norway (NO)
13 Sweden (SE)
14 Czech Republic (CZ)
15 Slovenia (SI)
16 Poland (PL)
17 Bulgaria (BG)
18 Russia (RU)
19 New Zealand (NZ)
20 Canada (CA)
21 Philippines (PH)
22 Israel Jews (IL-J)
23 Israel Arabs (IL-A)
24 Japan (JP)
25 Spain (ES)
26 Latvia (LV)
27 Slovakia (SK)
28 France (FR)
30 Portugal (PT)
31 Chile (CL)
32 Denmark (DK)
33 Switzerland (CH)
36 Venezuela (VE)
37 Finland (FI)
40 South Africa (ZA)
41 Taiwan (TW)
42 Korea (South) (KR)
43 Uruguay (UY)
page 4
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
COUNTRY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
1 Australia (AU) 2183 4.7 4.7
2 Germany-West (DE-W) 850 1.8 1.8
3 Germany-East (DE-E) 437 1.0 1.0
4 Great Britain (GB-GBN) 873 1.9 1.9
6 United States (US) 1216 2.6 2.6
7 Austria (AT) 1006 2.2 2.2
8 Hungary (HU) 1021 2.2 2.2
10 Ireland (IE) 1065 2.3 2.3
11 Netherlands (NL) 1823 4.0 4.0
12 Norway (NO) 1469 3.2 3.2
13 Sweden (SE) 1186 2.6 2.6
14 Czech Republic (CZ) 1276 2.8 2.8
15 Slovenia (SI) 1093 2.4 2.4
16 Poland (PL) 1277 2.8 2.8
17 Bulgaria (BG) 1069 2.3 2.3
18 Russia (RU) 2383 5.2 5.2
19 New Zealand (NZ) 1036 2.3 2.3
20 Canada (CA) 1211 2.6 2.6
21 Philippines (PH) 1200 2.6 2.6
22 Israel Jews (IL-J) 1066 2.3 2.3
23 Israel Arabs (IL-A) 152 0.3 0.3
24 Japan (JP) 1102 2.4 2.4
25 Spain (ES) 1212 2.6 2.6
26 Latvia (LV) 1000 2.2 2.2
27 Slovakia (SK) 1152 2.5 2.5
28 France (FR) 1669 3.6 3.6
30 Portugal (PT) 1602 3.5 3.5
31 Chile (CL) 1505 3.3 3.3
32 Denmark (DK) 1322 2.9 2.9
33 Switzerland (CH) 1037 2.3 2.3
36 Venezuela (VE) 1199 2.6 2.6
37 Finland (FI) 1379 3.0 3.0
40 South Africa (ZA) 2483 5.4 5.4
41 Taiwan (TW) 2016 4.4 4.4
42 Korea (South) (KR) 1315 2.9 2.9
43 Uruguay (UY) 1108 2.4 2.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 45993
page 5
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
This alphanumerical sample identification variable C_ALPHAN includes country codes that are based on ISO 3166.
All countries are coded in accordance with the ISO 3166-1-alpha-2 country code, if available. For Great Britain ISO 3166-2 is
applied. No ISO standard codes are available for the "historical" East/ West subdivision of Germany (DE-E/ DE-W) and for the
subsamples of Israel (IL-A, Arabs and IL-J, Jews).
This variable is used for the cross tabulations shown in the Variable Report.
AT = Austria
AU = Australia
BG = Bulgaria
CA = Canada
CH = Switzerland
CL = Chile
CZ = Czech Republic
DE-E = Germany-East
DE-W = Germany-West
DK = Denmark
ES = Spain
FI = Finland
FR = France
GB-GBN = Great Britain
HU = Hungary
IE = Ireland
IL-A = Israel, Arabs
IL-J = Israel, Jews
JP = Japan
KR = Korea (South)
LV = Latvia
NL = Netherlands
NO = Norway
NZ = New Zealand
PH = Philippines
PL = Poland
PT = Portugal
RU = Russia
SE = Sweden
SI = Slovenia
SK = Slovakia
TW = Taiwan
US = United States
UY = Uruguay
VE = Venezuela
page 6
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ZA = South Africa
C_ALPHAN
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
AT 1006 2.2 2.2
AU 2183 4.7 4.7
BG 1069 2.3 2.3
CA 1211 2.6 2.6
CH 1037 2.3 2.3
CL 1505 3.3 3.3
CZ 1276 2.8 2.8
DE-E 437 1.0 1.0
DE-W 850 1.8 1.8
DK 1322 2.9 2.9
ES 1212 2.6 2.6
FI 1379 3.0 3.0
FR 1669 3.6 3.6
GB-GBN 873 1.9 1.9
HU 1021 2.2 2.2
IE 1065 2.3 2.3
IL-A 152 0.3 0.3
IL-J 1066 2.3 2.3
JP 1102 2.4 2.4
KR 1315 2.9 2.9
LV 1000 2.2 2.2
NL 1823 4.0 4.0
NO 1469 3.2 3.2
NZ 1036 2.3 2.3
PH 1200 2.6 2.6
PL 1277 2.8 2.8
PT 1602 3.5 3.5
RU 2383 5.2 5.2
SE 1186 2.6 2.6
SI 1093 2.4 2.4
SK 1152 2.5 2.5
TW 2016 4.4 4.4
US 1216 2.6 2.6
UY 1108 2.4 2.4
VE 1199 2.6 2.6
ZA 2483 5.4 5.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 45993
page 7
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.1
We are all part of different groups. Some are more important to us than others when we think of ourselves. In general, which in
the following list is most important to you in describing who you are? and the second most important? and the third most
important?
(Deviation in oral interviews: Use card with choices)
in Spain (ES):
11 None
Note:
Hungary (HU): Did not include code 7
South Korea (KR): Did not include code 2
page 8
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 174 (18.3) 46 (4.8) 96 (10.1) 29 (3.0) 38 (4.0) 12 (1.3) 71 (7.5) 402 (42.2) 28 (2.9) 57 (6.0)
AU 336 (15.8) 56 (2.6) 137 (6.4) 95 (4.5) 101 (4.8) 12 (0.6) 180 (8.5) 1108 (52.1) 32 (1.5) 68 (3.2)
BG 225 (22.2) 120 (11.9) 61 (6.0) 101 (10.0) 12 (1.2) 1 (0.1) 151 (14.9) 287 (28.4) 25 (2.5) 29 (2.9)
CA 132 (11.8) 32 (2.9) 89 (8.0) 34 (3.0) 66 (5.9) 8 (0.7) 113 (10.1) 566 (50.6) 15 (1.3) 63 (5.6)
CH 227 (23.7) 123 (12.8) 90 (9.4) 90 (9.4) 20 (2.1) 6 (0.6) 56 (5.8) 269 (28.1) 18 (1.9) 60 (6.3)
CL 297 (20.2) 122 (8.3) 359 (24.4) 60 (4.1) 44 (3.0) 9 (0.6) 184 (12.5) 316 (21.5) 30 (2.0) 50 (3.4)
CZ 340 (26.9) 45 (3.6) 191 (15.1) 107 (8.5) 25 (2.0) 8 (0.6) 110 (8.7) 333 (26.3) 43 (3.4) 64 (5.1)
DE-E 78 (20.7) 18 (4.8) 80 (21.2) 24 (6.4) 7 (1.9) 23 (6.1) 107 (28.4) 15 (4.0) 25 (6.6)
DE-W 125 (18.9) 43 (6.5) 113 (17.1) 35 (5.3) 26 (3.9) 9 (1.4) 26 (3.9) 236 (35.6) 17 (2.6) 32 (4.8)
DK 98 (11.9) 11 (1.3) 45 (5.4) 27 (3.3) 18 (2.2) 6 (0.7) 46 (5.6) 546 (66.1) 13 (1.6) 16 (1.9)
ES 249 (21.2) 37 (3.1) 166 (14.1) 253 (21.5) 22 (1.9) 36 (3.1) 78 (6.6) 182 (15.5) 44 (3.7) 36 (3.1) 74 (6.3)
FI 190 (25.2) 14 (1.9) 75 (10.0) 76 (10.1) 34 (4.5) 14 (1.9) 167 (22.2) 145 (19.3) 18 (2.4) 20 (2.7)
FR 232 (14.4) 112 (6.9) 326 (20.2) 91 (5.6) 76 (4.7) 34 (2.1) 259 (16.1) 297 (18.4) 89 (5.5) 96 (6.0)
GB-GBN 84 (13.4) 14 (2.2) 61 (9.7) 22 (3.5) 19 (3.0) 2 (0.3) 60 (9.6) 340 (54.1) 11 (1.8) 15 (2.4)
HU 133 (14.0) 84 (8.8) 72 (7.6) 108 (11.3) 38 (4.0) 12 (1.3) 327 (34.3) 58 (6.1) 121 (12.7)
IE 154 (15.6) 31 (3.1) 84 (8.5) 30 (3.0) 79 (8.0) 5 (0.5) 159 (16.1) 397 (40.3) 7 (0.7) 40 (4.1)
IL-A 30 (19.7) 42 (27.6) 12 (7.9) 7 (4.6) 27 (17.8) 4 (2.6) 20 (13.2) 3 (2.0) 5 (3.3) 2 (1.3)
IL-J 179 (17.1) 32 (3.1) 99 (9.4) 57 (5.4) 140 (13.4) 13 (1.2) 193 (18.4) 249 (23.8) 54 (5.2) 32 (3.1)
JP 220 (22.5) 90 (9.2) 113 (11.6) 68 (7.0) 17 (1.7) 11 (1.1) 149 (15.3) 220 (22.5) 18 (1.8) 71 (7.3)
KR 251 (19.2) 103 (7.9) 116 (8.9) 57 (4.4) 2 (0.2) 83 (6.4) 584 (44.8) 40 (3.1) 68 (5.2)
LV 224 (22.7) 122 (12.3) 80 (8.1) 101 (10.2) 29 (2.9) 12 (1.2) 353 (35.7) 41 (4.1) 26 (2.6)
NL 151 (13.7) 19 (1.7) 66 (6.0) 119 (10.8) 62 (5.6) 12 (1.1) 62 (5.6) 485 (44.0) 72 (6.5) 55 (5.0)
NO 123 (10.4) 19 (1.6) 162 (13.6) 41 (3.5) 46 (3.9) 9 (0.8) 111 (9.3) 628 (52.9) 16 (1.3) 33 (2.8)
NZ 52 (14.1) 10 (2.7) 43 (11.7) 11 (3.0) 25 (6.8) 4 (1.1) 37 (10.0) 175 (47.4) 4 (1.1) 8 (2.2)
PH 186 (15.5) 74 (6.2) 51 (4.3) 40 (3.3) 138 (11.5) 6 (0.5) 76 (6.3) 538 (44.8) 55 (4.6) 36 (3.0)
PL 202 (17.8) 22 (1.9) 120 (10.6) 48 (4.2) 125 (11.0) 4 (0.4) 158 (14.0) 374 (33.0) 29 (2.6) 50 (4.4)
PT 207 (13.5) 49 (3.2) 336 (21.9) 106 (6.9) 54 (3.5) 9 (0.6) 196 (12.8) 479 (31.2) 36 (2.3) 63 (4.1)
RU 608 (25.8) 244 (10.3) 202 (8.6) 191 (8.1) 49 (2.1) 15 (0.6) 69 (2.9) 655 (27.8) 154 (6.5) 171 (7.3)
SE 83 (14.9) 5 (0.9) 77 (13.8) 25 (4.5) 13 (2.3) 8 (1.4) 33 (5.9) 292 (52.5) 5 (0.9) 15 (2.7)
SI 191 (18.3) 125 (12.0) 107 (10.3) 65 (6.2) 31 (3.0) 3 (0.3) 109 (10.5) 267 (25.6) 17 (1.6) 127 (12.2)
SK 188 (16.8) 20 (1.8) 120 (10.8) 45 (4.0) 132 (11.8) 6 (0.5) 45 (4.0) 491 (44.0) 11 (1.0) 58 (5.2)
TW 603 (31.9) 61 (3.2) 38 (2.0) 442 (23.4) 149 (7.9) 123 (6.5) 81 (4.3) 62 (3.3) 161 (8.5) 170 (9.0)
US 186 (15.5) 52 (4.3) 103 (8.6) 42 (3.5) 132 (11.0) 5 (0.4) 29 (2.4) 581 (48.4) 25 (2.1) 46 (3.8)
UY 229 (21.1) 34 (3.1) 223 (20.5) 60 (5.5) 25 (2.3) 13 (1.2) 161 (14.8) 258 (23.7) 19 (1.7) 65 (6.0)
VE 223 (18.8) 28 (2.4) 57 (4.8) 53 (4.5) 126 (10.6) 17 (1.4) 187 (15.8) 260 (21.9) 100 (8.4) 136 (11.5)
ZA 265 (13.9) 394 (20.7) 162 (8.5) 64 (3.4) 183 (9.6) 12 (0.6) 141 (7.4) 597 (31.4) 24 (1.3) 61 (3.2)
N Sum 7475 2350 4319 2883 2185 450 3635 13409 1349 2085 74
N Valid Sum 7475 2350 4319 2883 2185 450 3635 13409 1349 2085 74
page 9
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 10
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.1
We are all part of different groups. Some are more important to us than others when we think of ourselves. In general, which in
the following list is most important to you in describing who you are? and the second most important? and the third most
important?
(Deviation in oral interviews: Use card with choices)
in Spain (ES):
11 None
Note:
Hungary (HU): Did not include code 7
South Korea (KR): Did not include code 2
page 11
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 221 (22.2) 79 (7.9) 102 (10.3) 40 (4.0) 44 (4.4) 18 (1.8) 119 (12.0) 153 (15.4) 126 (12.7) 93 (9.3)
AU 457 (21.7) 103 (4.9) 208 (9.9) 220 (10.5) 110 (5.2) 18 (0.9) 258 (12.3) 326 (15.5) 116 (5.5) 286 (13.6)
BG 185 (18.6) 94 (9.5) 63 (6.3) 146 (14.7) 47 (4.7) 12 (1.2) 107 (10.8) 181 (18.2) 64 (6.4) 94 (9.5)
CA 203 (18.3) 44 (4.0) 92 (8.3) 98 (8.9) 96 (8.7) 8 (0.7) 162 (14.6) 178 (16.1) 82 (7.4) 144 (13.0)
CH 172 (18.6) 122 (13.2) 85 (9.2) 132 (14.3) 25 (2.7) 17 (1.8) 68 (7.4) 164 (17.7) 47 (5.1) 92 (10.0)
CL 207 (14.2) 93 (6.4) 261 (17.9) 125 (8.6) 93 (6.4) 10 (0.7) 226 (15.5) 284 (19.5) 58 (4.0) 101 (6.9)
CZ 238 (19.0) 80 (6.4) 173 (13.8) 173 (13.8) 41 (3.3) 24 (1.9) 146 (11.7) 171 (13.7) 103 (8.2) 102 (8.2)
DE-E 51 (13.8) 25 (6.8) 35 (9.5) 55 (14.9) 5 (1.4) 5 (1.4) 44 (11.9) 70 (18.9) 45 (12.2) 35 (9.5)
DE-W 118 (18.0) 52 (7.9) 60 (9.1) 77 (11.7) 48 (7.3) 15 (2.3) 56 (8.5) 104 (15.8) 65 (9.9) 62 (9.4)
DK 306 (37.5) 20 (2.5) 71 (8.7) 62 (7.6) 18 (2.2) 21 (2.6) 103 (12.6) 88 (10.8) 58 (7.1) 68 (8.3)
ES 150 (13.3) 82 (7.2) 189 (16.7) 179 (15.8) 29 (2.6) 46 (4.1) 79 (7.0) 148 (13.1) 57 (5.0) 83 (7.3) 90 (8.0)
FI 136 (19.2) 19 (2.7) 78 (11.0) 101 (14.3) 25 (3.5) 30 (4.2) 108 (15.3) 113 (16.0) 43 (6.1) 55 (7.8)
FR 257 (16.2) 80 (5.0) 170 (10.7) 203 (12.8) 63 (4.0) 46 (2.9) 225 (14.2) 270 (17.0) 126 (7.9) 148 (9.3)
GB-GBN 150 (23.5) 10 (1.6) 97 (15.2) 54 (8.5) 31 (4.9) 8 (1.3) 86 (13.5) 104 (16.3) 39 (6.1) 60 (9.4)
HU 111 (11.9) 62 (6.7) 84 (9.0) 147 (15.8) 51 (5.5) 27 (2.9) 159 (17.1) 113 (12.2) 175 (18.8)
IE 159 (16.4) 42 (4.3) 92 (9.5) 79 (8.1) 140 (14.4) 13 (1.3) 173 (17.8) 150 (15.4) 24 (2.5) 100 (10.3)
IL-A 18 (11.8) 26 (17.1) 18 (11.8) 19 (12.5) 28 (18.4) 12 (7.9) 20 (13.2) 4 (2.6) 2 (1.3) 5 (3.3)
IL-J 155 (15.0) 37 (3.6) 72 (7.0) 97 (9.4) 128 (12.4) 38 (3.7) 170 (16.4) 174 (16.8) 106 (10.2) 58 (5.6)
JP 123 (13.3) 70 (7.6) 119 (12.9) 146 (15.8) 18 (1.9) 22 (2.4) 89 (9.6) 163 (17.6) 35 (3.8) 140 (15.1)
KR 209 (16.1) 129 (10.0) 250 (19.3) 90 (6.9) 11 (0.8) 97 (7.5) 223 (17.2) 112 (8.6) 174 (13.4)
LV 187 (19.0) 144 (14.7) 116 (11.8) 118 (12.0) 49 (5.0) 13 (1.3) 31 (3.2) 196 (20.0) 68 (6.9) 60 (6.1)
NL 226 (21.7) 37 (3.6) 76 (7.3) 137 (13.2) 71 (6.8) 41 (3.9) 87 (8.4) 144 (13.8) 115 (11.0) 107 (10.3)
NO 311 (26.2) 36 (3.0) 133 (11.2) 106 (8.9) 41 (3.5) 25 (2.1) 160 (13.5) 207 (17.5) 35 (3.0) 132 (11.1)
NZ 75 (20.6) 27 (7.4) 44 (12.1) 26 (7.1) 18 (4.9) 3 (0.8) 60 (16.5) 72 (19.8) 13 (3.6) 26 (7.1)
PH 243 (20.3) 90 (7.5) 84 (7.0) 57 (4.8) 239 (19.9) 30 (2.5) 94 (7.8) 216 (18.0) 95 (7.9) 52 (4.3)
PL 213 (18.8) 62 (5.5) 111 (9.8) 110 (9.7) 128 (11.3) 13 (1.1) 149 (13.2) 168 (14.8) 66 (5.8) 112 (9.9)
PT 234 (15.6) 63 (4.2) 274 (18.2) 177 (11.8) 80 (5.3) 26 (1.7) 213 (14.2) 273 (18.2) 65 (4.3) 97 (6.5)
RU 396 (17.0) 278 (11.9) 216 (9.3) 295 (12.6) 108 (4.6) 59 (2.5) 123 (5.3) 442 (18.9) 252 (10.8) 166 (7.1)
SE 172 (31.3) 13 (2.4) 64 (11.6) 68 (12.4) 13 (2.4) 18 (3.3) 58 (10.5) 66 (12.0) 23 (4.2) 55 (10.0)
SI 138 (13.5) 96 (9.4) 72 (7.0) 109 (10.6) 76 (7.4) 15 (1.5) 154 (15.0) 168 (16.4) 51 (5.0) 147 (14.3)
SK 225 (21.6) 31 (3.0) 93 (8.9) 82 (7.9) 91 (8.7) 5 (0.5) 179 (17.2) 160 (15.4) 57 (5.5) 118 (11.3)
TW 308 (16.4) 61 (3.2) 46 (2.4) 231 (12.3) 281 (14.9) 166 (8.8) 151 (8.0) 170 (9.0) 229 (12.2) 238 (12.7)
US 236 (19.7) 74 (6.2) 102 (8.5) 118 (9.9) 158 (13.2) 14 (1.2) 63 (5.3) 236 (19.7) 75 (6.3) 120 (10.0)
UY 134 (12.5) 46 (4.3) 168 (15.6) 112 (10.4) 57 (5.3) 38 (3.5) 175 (16.3) 221 (20.6) 41 (3.8) 83 (7.7)
VE 161 (13.7) 45 (3.8) 68 (5.8) 85 (7.2) 125 (10.6) 27 (2.3) 176 (15.0) 216 (18.4) 128 (10.9) 144 (12.3)
ZA 191 (9.7) 271 (13.7) 216 (10.9) 181 (9.1) 336 (17.0) 72 (3.6) 216 (10.9) 270 (13.6) 98 (5.0) 128 (6.5)
N Sum 7076 2514 4081 4415 3001 966 4425 6452 2832 3860 90
N Valid Sum 7076 2514 4081 4415 3001 966 4425 6452 2832 3860 90
page 12
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 13
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.1
We are all part of different groups. Some are more important to us than others when we think of ourselves. In general, which in
the following list is most important to you in describing who you are? and the second most important? and the third most
important?
(Deviation in oral interviews: Use card with choices)
in Spain (ES):
11 None
Note:
Hungary (HU): Did not include code 7
South Korea (KR): Did not include code 2
page 14
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 106 (10.9) 65 (6.7) 69 (7.1) 70 (7.2) 62 (6.4) 20 (2.1) 131 (13.5) 100 (10.3) 177 (18.3) 169 (17.4)
AU 351 (16.9) 100 (4.8) 175 (8.4) 253 (12.2) 99 (4.8) 43 (2.1) 240 (11.5) 144 (6.9) 136 (6.5) 541 (26.0)
BG 116 (12.5) 94 (10.1) 53 (5.7) 106 (11.4) 42 (4.5) 23 (2.5) 108 (11.6) 149 (16.0) 89 (9.6) 149 (16.0)
CA 176 (16.0) 44 (4.0) 91 (8.3) 110 (10.0) 73 (6.7) 21 (1.9) 127 (11.6) 77 (7.0) 99 (9.0) 279 (25.4)
CH 97 (11.3) 110 (12.8) 68 (7.9) 120 (14.0) 32 (3.7) 28 (3.3) 109 (12.7) 127 (14.8) 48 (5.6) 121 (14.1)
CL 171 (12.1) 77 (5.4) 192 (13.5) 135 (9.5) 94 (6.6) 15 (1.1) 195 (13.7) 256 (18.0) 98 (6.9) 186 (13.1)
CZ 144 (12.1) 48 (4.0) 152 (12.8) 142 (11.9) 59 (5.0) 37 (3.1) 134 (11.3) 138 (11.6) 108 (9.1) 227 (19.1)
DE-E 45 (12.4) 29 (8.0) 40 (11.0) 45 (12.4) 6 (1.7) 7 (1.9) 36 (9.9) 39 (10.7) 41 (11.3) 75 (20.7)
DE-W 90 (13.9) 50 (7.7) 67 (10.3) 74 (11.4) 30 (4.6) 17 (2.6) 70 (10.8) 59 (9.1) 93 (14.4) 98 (15.1)
DK 131 (16.0) 36 (4.4) 69 (8.4) 83 (10.1) 37 (4.5) 56 (6.8) 133 (16.2) 38 (4.6) 88 (10.7) 149 (18.2)
ES 122 (11.7) 53 (5.1) 116 (11.1) 164 (15.7) 36 (3.4) 55 (5.3) 81 (7.8) 120 (11.5) 66 (6.3) 123 (11.8) 108 (10.3)
FI 93 (13.5) 26 (3.8) 75 (10.9) 90 (13.0) 38 (5.5) 46 (6.7) 98 (14.2) 82 (11.9) 46 (6.7) 97 (14.0)
FR 241 (15.4) 104 (6.6) 115 (7.3) 179 (11.4) 84 (5.4) 54 (3.4) 204 (13.0) 188 (12.0) 210 (13.4) 187 (11.9)
GB-GBN 108 (17.1) 24 (3.8) 71 (11.3) 74 (11.7) 36 (5.7) 28 (4.4) 100 (15.8) 38 (6.0) 61 (9.7) 91 (14.4)
HU 92 (10.1) 61 (6.7) 87 (9.6) 153 (16.8) 41 (4.5) 39 (4.3) 127 (14.0) 112 (12.3) 198 (21.8)
IE 133 (13.7) 42 (4.3) 89 (9.2) 91 (9.4) 120 (12.4) 25 (2.6) 157 (16.2) 92 (9.5) 43 (4.4) 177 (18.3)
IL-A 4 (2.7) 22 (14.7) 5 (3.3) 5 (3.3) 25 (16.7) 21 (14.0) 34 (22.7) 19 (12.7) 10 (6.7) 5 (3.3)
IL-J 151 (14.9) 48 (4.7) 80 (7.9) 87 (8.6) 71 (7.0) 55 (5.4) 104 (10.3) 165 (16.3) 134 (13.3) 116 (11.5)
JP 84 (9.9) 48 (5.6) 102 (12.0) 131 (15.4) 22 (2.6) 29 (3.4) 72 (8.5) 155 (18.2) 46 (5.4) 162 (19.0)
KR 183 (14.3) 132 (10.3) 240 (18.8) 55 (4.3) 19 (1.5) 78 (6.1) 144 (11.3) 131 (10.3) 294 (23.0)
LV 126 (13.0) 156 (16.1) 112 (11.5) 120 (12.4) 45 (4.6) 10 (1.0) 34 (3.5) 122 (12.6) 110 (11.3) 136 (14.0)
NL 153 (15.0) 39 (3.8) 73 (7.2) 161 (15.8) 44 (4.3) 37 (3.6) 101 (9.9) 99 (9.7) 130 (12.8) 181 (17.8)
NO 206 (17.5) 40 (3.4) 134 (11.4) 121 (10.3) 28 (2.4) 38 (3.2) 207 (17.6) 107 (9.1) 64 (5.4) 231 (19.6)
NZ 66 (18.2) 26 (7.2) 45 (12.4) 26 (7.2) 17 (4.7) 8 (2.2) 63 (17.4) 31 (8.6) 21 (5.8) 59 (16.3)
PH 135 (11.3) 121 (10.1) 106 (8.8) 67 (5.6) 222 (18.5) 46 (3.8) 139 (11.6) 134 (11.2) 125 (10.4) 103 (8.6)
PL 120 (10.3) 60 (5.2) 123 (10.6) 100 (8.6) 134 (11.5) 104 (8.9) 143 (12.3) 99 (8.5) 93 (8.0) 188 (16.2)
PT 163 (11.5) 83 (5.9) 211 (14.9) 166 (11.7) 65 (4.6) 30 (2.1) 205 (14.5) 207 (14.6) 115 (8.1) 173 (12.2)
RU 284 (12.5) 230 (10.1) 181 (8.0) 234 (10.3) 117 (5.1) 112 (4.9) 157 (6.9) 276 (12.1) 293 (12.9) 391 (17.2)
SE 88 (16.3) 19 (3.5) 67 (12.4) 64 (11.8) 15 (2.8) 29 (5.4) 75 (13.9) 49 (9.1) 36 (6.7) 99 (18.3)
SI 109 (10.8) 84 (8.3) 81 (8.0) 104 (10.3) 70 (6.9) 28 (2.8) 115 (11.4) 136 (13.5) 70 (6.9) 211 (20.9)
SK 161 (17.3) 19 (2.0) 67 (7.2) 74 (8.0) 50 (5.4) 24 (2.6) 114 (12.3) 95 (10.2) 64 (6.9) 262 (28.2)
TW 231 (12.3) 61 (3.3) 51 (2.7) 166 (8.9) 231 (12.3) 176 (9.4) 140 (7.5) 205 (10.9) 290 (15.5) 323 (17.2)
US 165 (13.9) 72 (6.1) 140 (11.8) 128 (10.8) 94 (7.9) 32 (2.7) 64 (5.4) 124 (10.5) 122 (10.3) 242 (20.5)
UY 128 (12.1) 35 (3.3) 123 (11.6) 102 (9.6) 52 (4.9) 38 (3.6) 188 (17.8) 173 (16.3) 76 (7.2) 144 (13.6)
VE 153 (13.1) 43 (3.7) 65 (5.6) 103 (8.8) 114 (9.8) 26 (2.2) 125 (10.7) 177 (15.1) 153 (13.1) 210 (18.0)
ZA 194 (9.6) 281 (13.9) 197 (9.7) 154 (7.6) 197 (9.7) 173 (8.6) 226 (11.2) 193 (9.5) 143 (7.1) 264 (13.1)
N Sum 5120 2450 3624 4242 2557 1549 4307 4484 3741 6661 108
N Valid Sum 5120 2450 3624 4242 2557 1549 4307 4484 3741 6661 108
page 15
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 16
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.2
How close do you feel to...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very close
2 Close
3 Not very close
4 Not close at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "Feel close to" is to be understood as "emotionally attached to" or "identifying with"
page 17
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 18
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.2
How close do you feel to...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very close
2 Close
3 Not very close
4 Not close at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "Feel close to" is to be understood as "emotionally attached to" or "identifying with"
page 19
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 20
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.2
How close do you feel to...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.2c [COUNTRY]
1 Very close
2 Close
3 Not very close
4 Not close at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "Feel close to" is to be understood as "emotionally attached to" or "identifying with"
page 21
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 22
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.2
How close do you feel to...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very close
2 Close
3 Not very close
4 Not close at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "Feel close to" is to be understood as "emotionally attached to" or "identifying with"
page 23
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 24
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important. How
important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British", American "a true American"
page 25
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 26
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important. How
important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British", American "a true American"
page 27
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 28
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V13 - Q3c Important: To have lived in [Country] for most of one’s life
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important. How
important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British", American "a true American"
page 29
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 30
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important. How
important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British", American "a true American"
page 31
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 32
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important. How
important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.3e To be a [religion]
[The dominant religion or denomination in your country should be given (eg. Christian in the US and Canada, Catholic in Ireland
and Italy, Russian Orthodox in Russia)]
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British",American "a true American"
page 33
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 34
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V16 - Q3f Important: To respect [Country Nationality] political institutions and laws
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important. How
important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British",American "a true American"
page 35
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 36
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important. How
important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British",American "a true American"
page 37
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 38
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.3
Some people say that the following things are important for being truly [NATIONALITY]. Others say they are not important.
How important do you think each of the following is...
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very important
2 Fairly important
3 Not very important
4 Not important at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in BG LV:
0 Not available/ Not asked
Note:
Precode: "truly [NATIONALITY]" E.g. "truly British",American "a true American"
page 39
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 40
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V19 - Q4a I would rather be a citizen of [Country] than of any other country in the world
Q.4
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.4a I would rather be a citizen of [COUNTRY] than of any other country in the world
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 41
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 42
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V20 - Q4b There are some things about [Country] today that make me feel ashamed of [Country]
Q.4
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.4b There are some things about [COUNTRY] today that make me feel ashamed of [COUNTRY]
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 43
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 44
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V21 - Q4c The world would be a better place if people from other countries were more like the [Country Nationality]
Q.4
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.4c The world would be a better place if people from other countries were more like the [COUNTRY NATIONALITY]
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 45
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 46
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V22 - Q4d Generally speaking, [Country] is a better country than most other countries
Q.4
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.4d Generally speaking, [COUNTRY] is a better country than most other countries
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 47
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 48
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V23 - Q4e People should support their country even if the country is in the wrong.
Q.4
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.4e People should support their country even if the country is in the wrong
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in Bulgaria (BG):
0 Not asked (because of technical reasons)
page 49
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 50
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V24 - Q4f When my country does well in international sports, it makes meproud to be [Country Nationality]
Q.4
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.4f When my country does well in international sports, it makes me proud to be [COUNTRY NATIONALITY]
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in Bulgaria (BG):
0 Not asked (because of technical reasons)
page 51
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 52
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.4
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 53
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 54
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 55
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 56
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 57
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 58
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 59
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 60
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 61
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 62
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 63
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 64
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 65
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 66
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V32 - Q5g How proud: Its achievements in the arts and literature
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 67
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 68
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 69
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 70
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 71
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 72
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V35 - Q5j How proud: Its fair and equal treatment of all groups in society
Q.5
How proud are you of [COUNTRY] in each of the following?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Very proud
2 Somewhat proud
3 Not very proud
4 Not proud at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 73
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 74
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V36 - Q6a [Country] should limit the import of foreign products in order to protect its national economy.
Q.6
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.6a [COUNTRY] should limit the import of foreign products in order to protect its national economy
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 75
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 76
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V37 - Q6b For certain problems, like environment pollution, international bodies should have the right to enforce solutions
Q.6
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.6b For certain problems, like environment pollution, international bodies should have the right to enforce solutions
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 77
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 78
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V38 - Q6c [Country] should follow its own interests, even if this leads to conflicts with other nations
Q.6
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.6c [COUNTRY] should follow its own interests, even if this leads to conflicts with other nations
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 79
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 80
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.6
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 81
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 82
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V40 - Q6e [Country’s] television should give preference to [Country] films and programmes
Q.6
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.6e [COUNTRY'S] television should give preference to [COUNTRY] films and programmes
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 83
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 84
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V41 - Q7a Large international companies are doing more and more damage to local businesses in [Country].
Q.7
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.7a Large international companies are doing more and more damage to local businesses in [COUNTRY]
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 85
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 86
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V42 - Q7b Free trade leads to better products becoming available in [Country].
Q.7
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 87
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 88
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V43 - Q7c In general, [Country] should follow the decisions of international organizations to which it belongs, even if the govern
Q.7
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.7c In general, [COUNTRY] should follow the decisions of international organizations to which it belongs, even if the
government does not agree with them
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 89
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 90
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V44 - Q7d International organizations are taking away too much power from the [Country Nationality] government.
Q.7
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.7d International organizations are taking away too much power from the [COUNTRY NATIONALITY] government
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 91
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 92
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V45 - Q7e Increased exposure to foreign films, music, and books is damaging our national and local cultures.
Q.7
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.7e Increased exposure to foreign films, music and books is damaging our national and local cultures
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 93
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 94
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V46 - Q7f A benefit of the Internet is that it makes information available to more and more people worldwide.
Q.7
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.7f A benefit of the Internet is that it makes information available to more and more people worldwide
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 95
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 96
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V47 - Q8a It is impossible for people who do not share [Country’s] customs and traditions to become fully [Country’s nationality]
Q.8
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.8a It is impossible for people who do not share [COUNTRY's] customs and traditions to become fully [COUNTRY'S
NATIONALITY]
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in Chile (CL):
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 97
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 98
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V48 - Q8b Ethnic minorities should be given government assistance to preserve their customs and traditions
Q.8
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.8b Ethnic minorities should be given government assistance to preserve their customs and traditions
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in Chile (CL):
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 99
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 100
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.9
Some people say that it is better for a country if different racial and ethnic groups maintain their distinct customs and traditions.
Others say that it is better if these groups adapt and blend into the larger society. Which of these views comes closer to your
own?
1 It is better for society if groups maintain their distinct customs and traditions
2 It is better if groups adapt and blend into the larger society
8 Don't know
9 No answer, refused
page 101
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 102
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.10
There are different opinions about immigrants from other countries living in [COUNTRY]. (By "immigrants" we mean people who
come to settle in [COUNTRY]). How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 103
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 104
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.10
There are different opinions about immigrants from other countries living in [COUNTRY]. (By "immigrants" we mean people who
come to settle in [COUNTRY]). How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 105
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 106
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V52 - Q10c Immigrants take jobs away from people who were born in [Country]
Q.10
There are different opinions about immigrants from other countries living in [COUNTRY]. (By "immigrants" we mean people who
come to settle in [COUNTRY]). How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.10c Immigrants take jobs away from people who were born in [COUNTRY]
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 107
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 108
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V53 - Q10d Immigrants improve [Country Nationality] society by bringing in new ideas and cultures
Q.10
There are different opinions about immigrants from other countries living in [COUNTRY]. (By "immigrants" we mean people who
come to settle in [COUNTRY]). How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.10d Immigrants improve [COUNTRY NATIONALITY] society by bringing in new ideas and cultures
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 109
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 110
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.10
There are different opinions about immigrants from other countries living in [COUNTRY]. (By "immigrants" we mean people who
come to settle in [COUNTRY]). How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 111
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 112
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.11
Do you think the number of immigrants to [COUNTRY] nowadays should be...
1 Increased a lot
2 Increased a little
3 Remain the same
4 Reduced a little
5 Reduced a lot
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 113
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 114
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.12
Are you a citizen of [COUNTRY]?
in Netherlands (NL):
What is your nationality?
1 Yes
2 No
9 No answer, refused
in Netherlands (NL):
1 Netherlands
2 Other
9 No answer
page 115
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 116
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.13
At the time of your birth, were both, one or neither of your parents citizens of [COUNTRY] *?
* [If your country was recently part of a larger political union (e.g. Russia, Slovenia and the Czech and Slovak Republics),
parental citizenship should refer to the preceding national state that your country devolved from]
1 Both citizens
2 Only father citizen
3 Only mother citizen
4 Neither parent
9 No answer, refused
in Slovenia (SI):
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 117
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 118
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.14
Racial/ ethnic (linguistic, religious) group of respondent.
(No extra question needed if you have the information in your demographics part)
page 119
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
41 Estonia
42 Ethiopia
43 European, White/European, Europe
44 Europeans Mediterranean
45 Finnish, Finland
46 French, France
47 Gallego
48 Georgian
49 German, Germany (CZ:Nemec)
50 German + Danish
51 Greek, Greece
52 Hebrew/Ivrit
53 Hungarian, Hungary (CZ:Magyar)
54 Ibanag
55 Ifugao
56 Igorot
57 Ilocano
58 Ilonggo
59 French + English
60 Indian, NL: Ind. + Neth., Hindi, Urdu, Gujarati, Tamil
61 Indonesian, Molukker, Malaysian
62 Inuit, Eskimo
63 Iranian, Persian/Farsi, Dari
64 Iraq, Arab
65 Irish/Irish Gaelic, Ireland
66 Isindebele
67 Isixhosa
68 Isizulu
69 Italian, Italy
70 Itawis
71 Itneg
72 Japanese, Japan
73 Jordan
74 Kapampangan
75 Karay-a
76 Korean
77 Kurdish, Assyrian, Lebanon, Syria
78 Latin-South-America, Columbia, NL Antilles
79 Latvian, Estonian, Lith.,Baltic
80 Lithuanian
81 Luxemborger, Luxemburg
82 Philippine other (Maguindanao, Kuyonin, Tangadanon, Zambaleõ)
83 Maori,NZ Maori
84 Maranaw/Maranao
85 Masbateõ
86 Metis
87 Montenegro
page 120
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
88 Moravian
89 Netherlands, Dutch, Frisisan, Flemish
90 Nordic, Scandinavian other
91 North Africans, NL: Neth. + Morocco
92 Norwegian, Norway
93 Occitan, France
94 One non-Swedish, both non-Swedish
95 Oriental
96 Ozamisnon
97 Pacific, Polynesian, Chamorro Guam
98 Pakistan, Panjab/Punjabi, Pashto
99 Panggalatok Pangasinan, Pangasinense
100 Philippines, Tagalog, Filippino
101 Pidgin, PNG Pidgin
102 Polish, Pole, Poland
103 Portuguese, Portugal
104 Provençal, France
105 Romani, Gipsy, Tzyganes
106 Romanian/Rumanian
107 Romblonon
108 Russian, Russia, USSR&Rep.
109 Samic, Lapp
110 Samoan, Tokelauan
111 Scotland, Scots Gaelic, Scottish
112 Sepedi
113 Serbia, Serbian,Serb, Yugoslavian
114 Sesotho
115 Setswana
116 Silesian
117 Siswati
118 Slovakia, Slovak
119 Slovenia, Slovenian, Slovene
120 Somalia
121 Spanish, Castilian, Castellano
122 Subanen
123 Surigaonon
124 Swedish (both citizen)
125 Switzerland, Rheto-roman
126 Tatar
127 Thai, Khmer, Vietnamese, Cont. Southeast
128 Tongan, Niuean
130 Tshivenda/Lemba
131 Turkey,Turkish
132 Ukraine, Ukrainian
133 Visayan/Cebuano, Boholano, Leyteno
134 Waray
135 Welsh
page 121
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in AU CL GB-GBN IL PL VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
Note:
Denmark (DK): 181 respondents in code 0; most of these respondents stated to be a citizen of Denmark (Q.12) and that both
one's parents were Danes (Q.13)
page 122
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 123
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 28 30 31 32 33 34
C_ALPHAN
page 124
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 35 39 41 42 43 44 45 46 49 50 51 52
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA 416 (35.2) 396 (33.5) 116 (9.8)
CH 3 (0.3) 1 (0.1) 11 (1.1) 32 (3.1) 4 (0.4)
CL
CZ 10 (0.8)
DE-E 387 (89.8)
DE-W 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 651 (78.3)
DK 1091 (95.6) 1 (0.1) 3 (0.3) 8 (0.7)
ES
FI 1379 (100.0)
FR 106 (6.4) 1449 (86.8)
GB-GBN
HU 5 (0.5)
IE 21 (2.0) 2 (0.2)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV 1 (0.1) 9 (0.9)
NL 2 (0.1) 5 (0.3) 1 (0.1)
NO 2 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 3 (0.2) 3 (0.2)
NZ 45 (4.3) 675 (65.2)
PH
PL
PT
RU 2 (0.1) 7 (0.3) 2 (0.1)
SE 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 3 (0.3) 14 (1.2) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
SI
SK
TW
US
UY 1 (0.1) 8 (1.0) 30 (3.9) 18 (2.3) 3 (0.4)
VE
ZA
N Sum 1096 499 2 1 687 106 1400 1890 1239 2 9 9
N Valid Sum 1096 499 2 1 687 106 1400 1890 1239 2 9 9
page 125
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 62 63 64 65 69
C_ALPHAN
AT 22 (2.2) 1 (0.1)
AU
BG
CA 2 (0.2) 17 (1.4)
CH 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 63 (6.1)
CL
CZ 1 (0.1)
DE-E
DE-W 4 (0.5) 3 (0.4) 1 (0.1) 6 (0.7)
DK 1 (0.1)
ES
FI
FR
GB-GBN
HU 1001 (98.0)
IE 1025 (96.8) 1 (0.1)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV
NL 1 (0.1) 5 (0.3) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
NO 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 4 (0.3)
NZ 11 (1.1) 7 (0.7)
PH 10 (0.8) 1 (0.1) 3 (0.3) 156 (13.0) 195 (16.3)
PL
PT
RU 1 (0.0)
SE 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
SI 2 (0.2) 3 (0.3)
SK 100 (8.7)
TW 4 (0.2)
US 8 (0.7)
UY 179 (23.0)
VE
ZA
N Sum 1134 10 1 3 156 195 35 7 17 8 2 1032 254
N Valid Sum 1134 10 1 3 156 195 35 7 17 8 2 1032 254
page 126
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 82 83 84
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA 3 (0.3)
CH 3 (0.3)
CL
CZ
DE-E
DE-W 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2)
DK 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
ES
FI
FR
GB-GBN
HU
IE
IL-A
IL-J
JP 1090 (99.8)
KR 1315 (100.0)
LV 600 (60.7)
NL 3 (0.2) 3 (0.2)
NO 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
NZ 172 (16.6)
PH 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 18 (1.5) 4 (0.3) 50 (4.2) 1 (0.1)
PL
PT
RU 1 (0.0) 4 (0.2) 2 (0.1)
SE 1 (0.1) 4 (0.3) 1 (0.1)
SI
SK
TW 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0)
US 3 (0.2) 33 (2.7)
UY 127 (16.3)
VE
ZA
N Sum 1 1 1094 1 18 4 1318 9 174 604 50 174 2
N Valid Sum 1 1 1094 1 18 4 1318 9 174 604 50 174 2
page 127
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 95 96 97 98 99 100
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA 6 (0.5)
CH 5 (0.5) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
CL
CZ 111 (9.0)
DE-E 1 (0.2)
DE-W 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 2 (0.2)
DK 2 (0.2) 4 (0.4)
ES 1 (0.1)
FI
FR 25 (1.5)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1 (0.1)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV
NL 1711 (95.2) 2 (0.1)
NO 5 (0.3) 1374 (95.3) 3 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
NZ 11 (1.1)
PH 13 (1.1) 1 (0.1) 10 (0.8) 288 (24.0)
PL
PT
RU
SE 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 3 (0.3) 6 (0.5)
SI
SK
TW
US 2 (0.2) 7 (0.6)
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 13 6 1 111 1731 10 27 1386 1 1 2 7 10 298
N Valid Sum 13 6 1 111 1731 10 27 1386 1 1 2 7 10 298
page 128
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 102 103 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 113 116 118 119
C_ALPHAN
page 129
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 131 132 133 134
C_ALPHAN
AT 14 (1.4)
AU
BG 78 (7.3)
CA
CH 5 (0.5) 1 (0.1) 821 (79.6) 1 (0.1) 4 (0.4)
CL
CZ 1 (0.1)
DE-E
DE-W 3 (0.4) 1 (0.1) 33 (4.0)
DK 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 5 (0.4)
ES
FI
FR
GB-GBN
HU
IE 2 (0.2)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV 1 (0.1) 19 (1.9)
NL 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 3 (0.2) 14 (0.8)
NO 13 (0.9) 1 (0.1) 3 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
NZ 7 (0.7)
PH 3 (0.3) 2 (0.2) 313 (26.1) 47 (3.9)
PL
PT
RU 96 (4.0) 28 (1.2)
SE 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1098 (94.0) 1 (0.1)
SI
SK 12 (1.0)
TW
US
UY 372 (47.8) 3 (0.4)
VE
ZA
N Sum 2 385 3 2 1114 822 97 11 7 152 59 313 47
N Valid Sum 2 385 3 2 1114 822 97 11 7 152 59 313 47
page 130
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V58 136 138 981 982 983 984 985 990 999 N Sum N Valid Sum
C_ALPHAN
M
AT 79 (7.9) 1006 1006
AU 2183
BG 11 (1.0) 6 1069 1063
CA 54 (4.6) 1 (0.1) 27 (2.3) 22 (1.9) 30 1211 1181
CH 8 (0.8) 6 1037 1031
CL 1505
CZ 1 (0.1) 47 1276 1229
DE-E 24 (5.6) 6 437 431
DE-W 72 (8.7) 19 850 831
DK 2 (0.2) 1322 1141
ES 1192 (99.2) 4 (0.3) 10 1212 1202
FI 1379 1379
FR 15 (0.9) 36 (2.2) 1669 1669
GB-GBN 873
HU 1 (0.1) 1021 1021
IE 6 1065 1059
IL-A 152
IL-J 1066
JP 10 1102 1092
KR 1315 1315
LV 1 (0.1) 12 1000 988
NL 3 (0.2) 8 (0.4) 3 (0.2) 25 1823 1798
NO 6 (0.4) 27 1469 1442
NZ 45 (4.3) 1036 1036
PH 1 (0.1) 2 1200 1198
PL 1277
PT 106 (7.1) 102 1602 1500
RU 10 (0.4) 6 2383 2377
SE 18 1186 1168
SI 7 (0.6) 7 1093 1086
SK 2 1152 1150
TW 2 (0.1) 2 2016 2014
US 966 (79.6) 4 (0.3) 2 1216 1214
UY 330 1108 778
VE 1199
ZA 2483
N Sum 2158 1 69 1 449 22 8 3 675 45993
N Valid Sum 2158 1 69 1 449 22 8 3 34399
page 131
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V59 - Q15a Children born in [Country] of parents who are not citizens should have the right to become [Country Nationality]
citizens
Q.15
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.15a Children born in [COUNTRY] of parents who are not citizens should have the right to become [COUNTRY
NATIONALITY] citizens
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 132
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 133
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V60 - Q15b Children born abroad should have the right to become [Country Nationality] citizens if at least one of their parents is
Q.15
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.15b Children born abroad should have the right to become [COUNTRY NATIONALITY] citizens if at least one of their parents
is a [COUNTRY NATIONALITY] citizen
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 134
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 135
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V61 - Q15c Legal immigrants to [Country] who are not citizens should have the same rights as [Country Nationality] citizens.
Q.15
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
Q.15c Legal immigrants to [COUNTRY] who are not citizens should have the same rights as [COUNTRY NATIONALITY]
citizens
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
page 136
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 137
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V62 - Q15d [Country] should take stronger measures to exclude illegal immigrants?
Q.15
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
Note:
Translation note: "Exclude" means "Keep out" and/or "Expel"
page 138
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 139
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.16
How proud are you of being [COUNTRY NATIONALITY]?
(Please, tick one box on each line)
page 140
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 141
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V64 - Q17a What language speak at home 1st mention,NL:Language most spoken at home
Q.17
What languages do you speak most often at home?
At home, I speak:
(Write down up to two choices)
in Netherlands (NL):
Language most spoken at home
page 142
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
35 Danish,Denmark
36 Danish+English
37 English + Persian
38 English + Thai
39 English,England&Wales,UK,England
40 Esperanto,Latin,Slavonik,Celtic
41 Estonia
42 Ethiopia
43 European,White/European,Europe
44 Europeans Mediterranean
45 Finnish,Finland
46 French,France
47 Gallego
48 Georgian
49 German,Germany (CZ:Nemec)
50 German+Danish
51 Greek,Greece
52 Hebrew/Ivrit
53 Hungarian,Hungary (CZ:Magyar)
54 Ibanag
55 Ifugao
56 Igorot
57 Ilocano
58 Ilonggo
59 French+English
60 Indian,Hindi,Ind+Neth,Urdu,Gujarati,Tamil
61 Indonesian,Molukker,Malay/Malaysian
62 Inuit, Eskimo
63 Iranian,Persian/Farsi,Dari
64 Iraq,Arab
65 Irish/Irish Gaelic,Ireland
66 Isindebele
67 Isixhosa
68 Isizulu
69 Italian,Italy
70 Itawis
71 Itneg
72 Japanese,Japan
73 Jordan
74 Kapampangan
75 Karay-a
76 Korean
77 Kurdish,Assyrian,Syria,Lebanese
78 Latin-South America, Columbia, NL Antilles
79 Latvian,Estonian,Lith.,Baltic
80 Lithuanian
81 Luxemborger, Luxemburg
page 143
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 144
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
129 Transcaucasian
130 Tshivenda/Lemba
131 Turkey,Turkish
132 Ukraine,Ukrainian
133 Visayan/Cebuano,Boholano,Leyteno
134 Waray
135 Welsh
136 Whites (all)
137 Xitsonga
138 Zamboangeño
980 Other African language
981 Other,East European
982 Other,Middle East
983 Other,Mixed origin
984 Other,Western European
985 Other languages,other answers
990 No languages at all
999 No answer, don't know
in AU BG CL DE GB-GBN HU NO PH PT SE SI UY VE:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 145
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 146
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V64 24 26 28 29 31 32 33 34 35 39 43 45
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU 1 (0.0) 8 (0.4) 1 (0.0) 37 (1.7) 1851 (86.0) 1 (0.0)
BG
CA 815 (69.1)
CH 8 (0.8) 7 (0.7)
CL
CZ 1263 (99.3)
DE-E
DE-W
DK 1 (0.1) 1272 (98.8) 3 (0.2)
ES 83 (6.9)
FI 1 (0.1) 5 (0.4) 1269 (92.0)
FR 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 6 (0.4)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1053 (98.9)
IL-A
IL-J 1 (0.1) 11 (1.0)
JP
KR
LV
NL
NO
NZ 2 (0.2) 6 (0.6) 982 (96.2)
PH
PL 1 (0.1)
PT
RU
SE
SI
SK 3 (0.3)
TW 2016 (100.0)
US 3 (0.2) 1154 (95.9)
UY
VE
ZA 337 (13.7) 1 (0.0)
N Sum 1 85 2 1 12 16 1267 2064 1272 6214 1 1270
N Valid Sum 1 85 2 1 12 16 1267 2064 1272 6214 1 1270
page 147
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V64 46 47 49 51 52 53 59 60 61 63 65 66 67
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU 7 (0.3) 22 (1.0) 22 (1.0) 1 (0.0) 5 (0.2) 16 (0.7) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.0)
BG
CA 299 (25.4) 37 (3.1)
CH 191 (18.4) 741 (71.5)
CL
CZ 2 (0.2)
DE-E
DE-W
DK 2 (0.2)
ES 66 (5.5)
FI 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
FR 1587 (97.9) 6 (0.4)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1 (0.1) 8 (0.8)
IL-A 4 (2.6) 1 (0.7)
IL-J 9 (0.8) 1 (0.1) 821 (77.2) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 4 (0.4)
JP
KR
LV
NL
NO
NZ 5 (0.5)
PH
PL
PT
RU 1 (0.0)
SE
SI
SK 83 (7.2)
TW
US 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2)
UY
VE
ZA 15 (0.6) 35 (1.4) 316 (12.8)
N Sum 2096 66 774 23 826 90 37 42 2 5 8 35 316
N Valid Sum 2096 66 774 23 826 90 37 42 2 5 8 35 316
page 148
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT
AU 55 (2.6) 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 2 (0.1) 8 (0.4) 1 (0.0) 16 (0.7) 1 (0.0) 17 (0.8)
BG
CA
CH 55 (5.3)
CL
CZ
DE-E
DE-W
DK 1 (0.1)
ES
FI
FR 1 (0.1) 5 (0.3) 1 (0.1)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1 (0.1)
IL-A
IL-J 1 (0.1)
JP 1079 (100.0)
KR 1315 (100.0)
LV 672 (67.2)
NL 1681 (93.1)
NO
NZ 1 (0.1)
PH
PL 1275 (99.9)
PT
RU
SE
SI
SK
TW
US 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2)
UY
VE
ZA 332 (13.5)
N Sum 332 110 1080 1316 1 674 1692 1 6 19 2 1295
N Valid Sum 332 110 1080 1316 1 674 1692 1 6 19 2 1295
page 149
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V64 103 105 106 108 110 112 113 114 115 117 118 119 121
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU 2 (0.1) 1 (0.0) 3 (0.1) 11 (0.5) 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 6 (0.3)
BG
CA
CH 2 (0.2) 5 (0.5) 8 (0.8)
CL
CZ 7 (0.6)
DE-E
DE-W
DK 1 (0.1)
ES 1013 (83.9)
FI 5 (0.4) 1 (0.1)
FR 2 (0.1)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
IL-A
IL-J 3 (0.3) 4 (0.4) 141 (13.3) 11 (1.0)
JP
KR
LV 328 (32.8)
NL
NO
NZ 3 (0.3) 2 (0.2)
PH
PL
PT
RU 2297 (96.6)
SE
SI
SK 4 (0.3) 1050 (91.1)
TW
US 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 25 (2.1)
UY
VE
ZA 192 (7.8) 207 (8.4) 211 (8.5) 55 (2.2)
N Sum 8 11 6 2775 3 192 19 207 211 55 1051 1 1067
N Valid Sum 8 11 6 2775 3 192 19 207 211 55 1051 1 1067
page 150
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V64 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 135 137 980 983 985 999
C_ALPHAN
M
AT
AU 8 (0.4) 1 (0.0) 3 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.0) 17 (0.8) 30
BG
CA 28 (2.4) 32
CH 2 (0.2) 13 (1.3)
CL
CZ 4
DE-E
DE-W
DK 1 (0.1) 3 (0.2)
ES 37 (3.1) 4
FI 86 (6.2) 8 (0.6)
FR 1 (0.1) 48
GB-GBN
HU
IE
IL-A
IL-J 1 (0.1) 7 (0.7) 1
JP 23
KR
LV
NL 125 (6.9) 17
NO
NZ 2 (0.2) 17 (1.7) 15
PH
PL
PT
RU 41 (1.7) 1 (0.0) 2 (0.1) 5
SE
SI
SK 12 (1.0)
TW
US 2 (0.2) 7 (0.6) 13
UY
VE
ZA 33 (1.3) 67 (2.7) 5 (0.2) 9 (0.4) 15
N Sum 86 2 41 9 2 1 33 8 17 1 67 5 145 125 207
N Valid Sum 86 2 41 9 2 1 33 8 17 1 67 5 145 125
page 151
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 1006
AU 2183 2153
BG 1069
CA 1211 1179
CH 1037 1037
CL 1505
CZ 1276 1272
DE-E 437
DE-W 850
DK 1322 1288
ES 1212 1208
FI 1379 1379
FR 1669 1621
GB-GBN 873
HU 1021
IE 1065 1065
IL-A 152 152
IL-J 1066 1063
JP 1102 1079
KR 1315 1315
LV 1000 1000
NL 1823 1806
NO 1469
NZ 1036 1021
PH 1200
PL 1277 1276
PT 1602
RU 2383 2378
SE 1186
SI 1093
SK 1152 1152
TW 2016 2016
US 1216 1203
UY 1108
VE 1199
ZA 2483 2468
N Sum 45993
N Valid Sum 30131
page 152
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V65 - Q17b What language speak at home 2nd mention,NL:Other languages spoken at home
Q.17
What languages do you speak most often at home?
At home, I speak:
(Write down up to two choices)
in Netherlands (NL):
Other language spoken at home
page 153
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
35 Danish,Denmark
36 Danish+English
37 English + Persian
38 English + Thai
39 English,England&Wales,UK,England
40 Esperanto,Latin,Slavonik,Celtic
41 Estonia
42 Ethiopia
43 European,White/European,Europe
44 Europeans Mediterranean
45 Finnish,Finland
46 French,France
47 Gallego
48 Georgian
49 German,Germany (CZ:Nemec)
50 German+Danish
51 Greek,Greece
52 Hebrew/Ivrit
53 Hungarian,Hungary (CZ:Magyar)
54 Ibanag
55 Ifugao
56 Igorot
57 Ilocano
58 Ilonggo
59 French+English
60 Indian,Hindi,Ind+Neth,Urdu,Gujarati,Tamil
61 Indonesian,Molukker,Malay/Malaysian
62 Inuit, Eskimo
63 Iranian,Persian/Farsi,Dari
64 Iraq,Arab
65 Irish/Irish Gaelic,Ireland
66 Isindebele
67 Isixhosa
68 Isizulu
69 Italian,Italy
70 Itawis
71 Itneg
72 Japanese,Japan
73 Jordan
74 Kapampangan
75 Karay-a
76 Korean
77 Kurdish,Assyrian,Syria,Lebanese
78 Latin-South America, Columbia, NL Antilles
79 Latvian,Estonian,Lith.,Baltic
80 Lithuanian
81 Luxemborger, Luxemburg
page 154
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 155
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
129 Transcaucasian
130 Tshivenda/Lemba
131 Turkey,Turkish
132 Ukraine,Ukrainian
133 Visayan/Cebuano,Boholano,Leyteno
134 Waray
135 Welsh
136 Whites (all)
137 Xitsonga
138 Zamboangeño
980 Other African language
981 Other,East European
982 Other,Middle East
983 Other,Mixed origin
984 Other,Western European
985 Other languages,other answers
990 No languages at all
999 No answer, don't know
in AU BG CL DE GB-GBN HU NO PH PT SE SI UY VE:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 156
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 157
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V65 26 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 43
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA
CH 4 (1.2) 36 (11.0)
CL
CZ 29 (31.5) 12 (13.0)
DE-E
DE-W
DK 1 (1.1) 22 (23.7) 1 (1.1) 1 (1.1) 1 (1.1) 43 (46.2)
ES 79 (22.2)
FI
FR 2 (1.1) 1 (0.5) 56 (29.5)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 9 (5.6)
IL-A
IL-J 25 (5.8)
JP 3 (8.8) 30 (88.2)
KR
LV 2 (1.4)
NL 1 (1.8) 2 (3.6) 5 (8.9)
NO
NZ 64 (50.4) 15 (11.8)
PH
PL 1 (20.0)
PT
RU 1 (3.0) 2 (6.1) 1 (3.0)
SE
SI
SK 1 (0.4) 24 (10.3)
TW
US 6 (4.0) 32 (21.2)
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 79 64 2 1 26 5 53 26 22 1 1 1 225 6
N Valid Sum 79 64 2 1 26 5 53 26 22 1 1 1 225 6
page 158
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V65 46 47 49 50 51 52 53 60 63 64 65 69 72
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA
CH 85 (26.1) 85 (26.1) 39 (12.0)
CL
CZ 3 (3.3) 10 (10.9) 4 (4.3)
DE-E
DE-W
DK 5 (5.4) 7 (7.5) 1 (1.1) 1 (1.1)
ES 25 (7.0)
FI
FR 20 (10.5) 18 (9.5) 7 (3.7)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 9 (5.6) 136 (84.0) 3 (1.9)
IL-A 65 (73.9)
IL-J 20 (4.6) 4 (0.9) 1 (0.2) 129 (29.8) 9 (2.1) 4 (0.9) 10 (2.3) 2 (0.5)
JP
KR
LV
NL 1 (1.8) 1 (1.8) 7 (12.5) 1 (1.8)
NO
NZ 2 (1.6) 3 (2.4) 1 (0.8) 2 (1.6)
PH
PL 3 (60.0)
PT
RU
SE
SI
SK 8 (3.4) 72 (30.8)
TW
US 6 (4.0) 4 (2.6) 3 (2.0) 2 (1.3) 2 (1.3) 2 (1.3) 1 (0.7)
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 148 25 142 1 4 196 87 16 10 1 136 54 3
N Valid Sum 148 25 142 1 4 196 87 16 10 1 136 54 3
page 159
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT
AU
BG
CA
CH 3 (0.9)
CL
CZ 8 (8.7)
DE-E
DE-W
DK 1 (1.1)
ES
FI
FR 1 (0.5) 10 (5.3) 14 (7.4) 5 (2.6)
GB-GBN
HU
IE
IL-A
IL-J 2 (0.5) 1 (0.2)
JP
KR 1315 (100.0)
LV 4 (2.7)
NL 2 (3.6) 1 (1.8) 2 (3.6) 2 (3.6) 1 (1.8)
NO
NZ 3 (2.4) 8 (6.3)
PH
PL
PT
RU 1 (3.0)
SE
SI
SK 3 (1.3)
TW
US 1 (0.7) 1 (0.7) 2 (1.3) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.7)
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 1318 2 1 1 1 10 1 2 1 10 14 1 2 19 10
N Valid Sum 1318 2 1 1 1 10 1 2 1 10 14 1 2 19 10
page 160
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V65 104 105 106 108 110 113 118 120 121 124 125 126 127 131
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA
CH 1 (0.3) 11 (3.4) 11 (3.4)
CL
CZ 2 (2.2) 1 (1.1) 13 (14.1) 1 (1.1)
DE-E
DE-W
DK 1 (1.1) 3 (3.2)
ES 169 (47.5)
FI
FR 4 (2.1) 15 (7.9) 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1)
GB-GBN
HU
IE 3 (1.9) 1 (0.6)
IL-A
IL-J 12 (2.8) 41 (9.5) 17 (3.9)
JP 1 (2.9)
KR
LV 1 (0.7) 134 (91.8)
NL 1 (1.8) 1 (1.8) 1 (1.8) 3 (5.4) 2 (3.6) 1 (1.8) 1 (1.8)
NO
NZ 7 (5.5) 2 (1.6)
PH
PL 1 (20.0)
PT
RU 12 (36.4) 10 (30.3)
SE
SI
SK 27 (11.5) 55 (23.5)
TW
US 1 (0.7) 1 (0.7) 71 (47.0) 2 (1.3)
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 4 30 14 191 7 2 68 3 292 2 11 10 3 7
N Valid Sum 4 30 14 191 7 2 68 3 292 2 11 10 3 7
page 161
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V65 132 133 983 985 990 999 N Sum N Valid Sum
C_ALPHAN
M
AT 1006
AU 2183
BG 1069
CA 1211
CH 49 (15.0) 711 1037 326
CL 1505
CZ 9 (9.8) 1184 1276 92
DE-E 437
DE-W 850
DK 1322 93
ES 53 (14.9) 856 1212 356
FI 1379
FR 1479 1669 190
GB-GBN 873
HU 1021
IE 903 1065 162
IL-A 152 88
IL-J 9 (2.1) 17 1066 433
JP 23 1102 34
KR 1315 1315
LV 2 (1.4) 1000 146
NL 4 (7.1) 12 (21.4) 2 (3.6) 1767 1823 56
NO 1469
NZ 15 (11.8) 909 1036 127
PH 1200
PL 1 1277 5
PT 1602
RU 2 (6.1) 2383 33
SE 1186
SI 1093
SK 44 (18.8) 918 1152 234
TW 2016
US 1 (0.7) 10 (6.6) 13 1216 151
UY 1108
VE 1199
ZA 2483
N Sum 48 1 149 12 2 8781 45993
N Valid Sum 48 1 149 12 2 3841
page 162
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.18
Which of these two statements comes closer to your own view?
in AU BG CL DE FI GB-GBN HU IE IL KR NL NO PH PT SE SI US UY VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 163
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 164
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.19a
How close do you feel to your ethnic group?
1 Very close
2 Close
3 Not very close
4 Not close at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in Netherlands (NL):
1 Very strong
2 Strong
3 Not very strong
4 Not strong at all
in AT AU BG CA CH CL DE FI GB-GBN HU IE KR NO PH PT SE SI UY VE:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 165
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 166
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.19b
Some people think of themselves first as [COUNTRY NATIONALITY]. Others may think of themselves first as [REGION].
Which if any, of the following best describes how you see yourself?
["Region" should be replaced by the appropriate subnational category in each COUNTRY (e.g. "Scotland" in Britain; "Catalonia"
in Spain)]
in AT AU BG CA CL DE DK FI GB-GBN HU IE IL JP KR LV NL NO PH PT SE SI TW US UY VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
Note:
If it is a face-to-face interview, insert the name of the appropriate subnational unit where the interview is being conducted; if it is
a self-completion questionnaire, all the relevant subnational units should be mentioned (e.g. "see themselves first as Scottish,
English, or Welsh"; "see themselves as only Scottish, English, or Welsh").
page 167
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 168
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.20
How much have you heard or read about the [European Union]?
[Take the appropriate association for your continent/subcontinent: EU, NAFTA, etc... Uruguay: refers to MERCOSUR; Canada,
United States: refers to NAFTA]
1 A lot
2 Quite a bit
3 Not much
4 Nothing at all
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in Netherlands (NL):
1 Much
in AU BG CL DE DK GB-GBN HU IE IL JP KR NZ PH PT SE SI TW VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 169
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 170
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.21_1
Generally speaking, would you say that [COUNTRY] benefits or does not benefit from being a member of the [EUROPEAN
UNION]?
[Take the appropriate association for your continent/subcontinent: EU, NAFTA, etc... Uruguay: refers to MERCOSUR; Canada,
United States: refers to NAFTA]
in Netherlands (NL):
1 Very much advantage
2 Much advantage
3 Somewhat advantage
4 Very little advantage
5 No advantage at all
in AU BG CL DE DK GB-GBN IE IL JP KR LV NO NZ PH PT SE SI TW VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 171
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 172
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V70_2 - Q21_2 Benefits from being member [European Union]: non EU MEMBERS
Q.21_2
Generally speaking, would you say that [COUNTRY] would benefit or would not benefit from being a member of the European
Union?
in AT AU BG CA CH CL CZ DE DK ES FI FR GB-GBN HU IE IL JP KR NL NZ PH PL PT RU SE SI SK TW US UY VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 173
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 174
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V71 - Q22 [Country] should follow [European Union] decisions, even if it does not agree with them.
Q.22
How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
(Please, tick one box)
[COUNTRY] should follow [EU] decisions, even if it does not agree with them.
[Take the appropriate association: Uruguay refers to MERCOSUR; United States refers to NAFTA]
1 Agree strongly
2 Agree
3 Neither agree nor disagree
4 Disagree
5 Disagree strongly
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in Netherlands (NL):
1 Much more power
2 More power
3 As much power
4 Less power
5 Much less power
in AU BG CA CH CL DE DK GB-GBN HU IE IL JP KR NZ PH PT RU SI TW VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 175
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 176
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.23
Generally, do you think that the [European Union] should have... Much more, more, as much, less, or much less power than the
national governments of its member states?
[Take the appropriate association for your continent/subcontinent: EU, NAFTA, etc... Uruguay: refers to MERCOSUR; Canada,
United States: refers to NAFTA]
1 Much more
2 More
3 As much
4 Less
5 Much less
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in AU BG CA CL DE GB-GBN IE IL JP KR NZ PH RU SI TW US UY VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 177
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 178
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.24a
(For prospective [EU] members only)
If there were a [referendum/vote] today to decide whether [COUNTRY] does or does not become a member of the [European
Union], would you vote in favor or would you vote against?
[Take the appropriate association for your continent/subcontinent: EU, NAFTA, etc...
Uruguay: refers to MERCOSUR
Canada, United States: refers to NAFTA]
1 Vote in favour
2 Vote against
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in AT AU BG CA CH CL DE DK ES FI FR GB-GBN IE JP KR NL PH PL PT RU SE SI TW US UY VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 179
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 180
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Q.24b
(For current [EU] members only)
If there were a [referendum/vote] today to decide whether [COUNTRY] does or does not remain a member of the [European
Union], would you vote in favour or would you vote against?
[Uruguay refers to MERCOSUR]
1 Vote in favour
2 Vote against
8 Can't choose
9 No answer, refused
in AU BG CA CH CL DE DK GB-GBN IE JP KR NZ PH PT RU SI TW US VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 181
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 182
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SEX - R: Sex
Sex of respondent
1 Male
2 Female
9 No answer, refused
page 183
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 184
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AGE - R: Age
Age of respondent
in AU GB-GBN:
96 96 years or older
page 185
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Note:
Category 4 not asked in Sweden (SE)
page 186
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 187
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 188
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 189
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Australia (AU):
1 0 or 1 year
in Norway (NO):
9 7 to 9 years
in VE ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 190
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 191
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
EDUCYRS 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
C_ALPHAN
AT 97 (9.8) 140 (14.1) 62 (6.2) 41 (4.1) 37 (3.7) 25 (2.5) 22 (2.2) 21 (2.1) 10 (1.0) 8 (0.8)
AU 179 (8.6) 248 (12.0) 135 (6.5) 174 (8.4) 178 (8.6) 185 (8.9) 124 (6.0) 92 (4.4) 52 (2.5) 54 (2.6)
BG 250 (23.9) 150 (14.4) 31 (3.0) 44 (4.2) 38 (3.6) 40 (3.8) 40 (3.8) 33 (3.2) 16 (1.5) 5 (0.5)
CA 60 (5.7) 245 (23.4) 87 (8.3) 92 (8.8) 85 (8.1) 87 (8.3) 77 (7.3) 63 (6.0) 26 (2.5) 20 (1.9)
CH 59 (5.7) 93 (9.0) 54 (5.2) 40 (3.9) 35 (3.4) 34 (3.3) 29 (2.8) 33 (3.2) 18 (1.7) 12 (1.2)
CL 55 (3.7) 348 (23.3) 68 (4.5) 84 (5.6) 68 (4.5) 46 (3.1) 86 (5.7) 42 (2.8) 16 (1.1) 8 (0.5)
CZ 158 (13.7) 380 (32.9) 223 (19.3) 37 (3.2) 26 (2.2) 30 (2.6) 52 (4.5) 43 (3.7) 2 (0.2) 6 (0.5)
DE-E 199 (45.6) 14 (3.2) 20 (4.6) 43 (9.9)
DE-W 246 (29.0) 55 (6.5) 44 (5.2) 67 (7.9)
DK 67 (5.8) 107 (9.3) 123 (10.7) 126 (10.9) 102 (8.8) 90 (7.8) 68 (5.9) 53 (4.6) 32 (2.8) 25 (2.2)
ES 40 (3.4) 92 (7.9) 26 (2.2) 44 (3.8) 43 (3.7) 22 (1.9) 25 (2.1) 35 (3.0) 14 (1.2) 34 (2.9)
FI 71 (5.6) 112 (8.9) 82 (6.5) 77 (6.1) 89 (7.1) 55 (4.4) 68 (5.4) 42 (3.3) 24 (1.9) 19 (1.5)
FR 144 (8.9) 220 (13.7) 85 (5.3) 168 (10.4) 90 (5.6) 94 (5.8) 117 (7.3) 82 (5.1) 88 (5.5) 36 (2.2)
GB-GBN 220 (25.2) 92 (10.6) 73 (8.4) 19 (2.2) 16 (1.8) 56 (6.4) 29 (3.3) 13 (1.5) 13 (1.5) 11 (1.3)
HU 217 (21.3) 237 (23.3) 52 (5.1) 80 (7.9) 50 (4.9)
IE 70 (6.9) 105 (10.3) 132 (13.0) 137 (13.5) 64 (6.3) 57 (5.6) 53 (5.2) 49 (4.8) 19 (1.9) 7 (0.7)
IL-A 7 (4.8) 54 (37.2) 4 (2.8) 14 (9.7) 17 (11.7) 18 (12.4) 4 (2.8) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.7)
IL-J 51 (4.9) 329 (31.5) 49 (4.7) 90 (8.6) 121 (11.6) 115 (11.0) 47 (4.5) 33 (3.2) 14 (1.3) 28 (2.7)
JP 19 (1.8) 420 (39.0) 17 (1.6) 108 (10.0) 20 (1.9) 132 (12.3) 10 (0.9) 5 (0.5) 2 (0.2)
KR 3 (0.2) 423 (32.5) 6 (0.5) 127 (9.8) 1 (0.1) 242 (18.6) 1 (0.1) 40 (3.1)
LV 149 (15.3) 135 (13.8) 89 (9.1) 88 (9.0) 78 (8.0) 74 (7.6) 36 (3.7) 12 (1.2) 5 (0.5) 5 (0.5)
NL 120 (6.8) 197 (11.2) 146 (8.3) 157 (8.9) 119 (6.8) 111 (6.3) 96 (5.5) 114 (6.5) 66 (3.8) 30 (1.7)
NO 123 (8.8) 222 (15.9) 170 (12.2) 129 (9.3) 133 (9.5) 123 (8.8) 83 (6.0) 75 (5.4) 45 (3.2) 19 (1.4)
NZ 292 (28.6) 272 (26.6) 206 (20.2) 166 (16.2)
PH 62 (5.2) 102 (8.5) 60 (5.0) 141 (11.8) 29 (2.4) 12 (1.0) 2 (0.2) 3 (0.3) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
PL 279 (21.8) 51 (4.0) 141 (11.0)
PT 62 (3.9) 150 (9.4) 41 (2.6) 31 (1.9) 30 (1.9) 43 (2.7) 66 (4.1) 27 (1.7) 13 (0.8) 7 (0.4)
RU 272 (11.5) 272 (11.5) 202 (8.6) 104 (4.4) 289 (12.2) 118 (5.0) 42 (1.8) 27 (1.1) 12 (0.5) 7 (0.3)
SE 156 (14.0) 159 (14.2) 107 (9.6) 93 (8.3) 73 (6.5) 79 (7.1) 71 (6.4) 27 (2.4) 14 (1.3) 10 (0.9)
SI 185 (17.0) 214 (19.7) 48 (4.4) 52 (4.8) 33 (3.0) 45 (4.1) 42 (3.9) 14 (1.3) 7 (0.6) 1 (0.1)
SK 69 (6.3) 269 (24.5) 217 (19.8) 92 (8.4) 48 (4.4) 42 (3.8) 88 (8.0) 58 (5.3) 24 (2.2) 10 (0.9)
TW 35 (1.7) 487 (24.2) 54 (2.7) 244 (12.1) 57 (2.8) 226 (11.2) 7 (0.3) 45 (2.2) 4 (0.2) 2 (0.1)
US 65 (5.3) 298 (24.5) 114 (9.4) 179 (14.7) 78 (6.4) 229 (18.8) 50 (4.1) 53 (4.4) 18 (1.5) 43 (3.5)
UY 54 (4.9) 95 (8.6) 16 (1.4) 19 (1.7) 37 (3.3) 27 (2.4) 22 (2.0) 16 (1.4) 3 (0.3) 8 (0.7)
VE
ZA
N Sum 3856 6674 2862 2854 2114 2727 1648 1427 557 418
N Valid Sum 3856 6674 2862 2854 2114 2727 1648 1427 557 418
page 192
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
EDUCYRS 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 39
C_ALPHAN
page 193
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
EDUCYRS 40 41 42 44 47 53 63 65 82 94 95 96 97 98 99
C_ALPHAN
M M
AT 21 (2.1) 47 (4.7) 2 10
AU 112
BG 12 (1.1) 14 (1.3) 25
CA 1 (0.1) 162
CH 20 (1.9) 1
CL 50 (3.3) 9
CZ 28 (2.4) 42 (3.6) 5 115
DE-E 8 (1.8) 20 (4.6) 2 (0.5) 1
DE-W 5 (0.6) 29 (3.4) 1 (0.1) 1
DK 128 (11.1) 3 165
ES 9 (0.8) 71 (6.1) 22 (1.9) 42 5
FI 102 (8.1) 113 (9.0) 1 (0.1) 117
FR 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 73 (4.5) 58
GB-GBN 1 (0.1) 15 (1.7) 1
HU 3
IE 9 (0.9) 51 (5.0) 6 (0.6) 8 41
IL-A 1 (0.7) 4 (2.8) 1 (0.7) 7
IL-J 1 (0.1) 9 (0.9) 7 (0.7) 2 20
JP 38 (3.5) 28 (2.6) 1 25
KR 13 (1.0) 141 (10.8) 58 (4.5) 15
LV 24 (2.5) 89 (9.1) 23
NL 74 (4.2) 97 (5.5) 64
NO 75
NZ 8 (0.8) 14
PH 4 (0.3) 5 (0.4) 24 (2.0)
PL 63 (4.9) 57 (4.5) 5 (0.4)
PT 24 (1.5) 26 (1.6) 101 (6.3) 3 7
RU 175 (7.4) 39 (1.7) 14 (0.6) 23
SE 5 (0.4) 70
SI 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.2) 38 (3.5) 63 (5.8) 7 (0.6) 3 3
SK 37 (3.4) 56 (5.1) 1 (0.1) 20 35
TW 179 (8.9) 1
US 2 (0.2)
UY 1 (0.1) 137 (12.4) 18 (1.6)
VE
ZA
N Sum 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 814 1246 512 137 1160
N Valid Sum 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 814 1246 512
page 194
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 1006 994
AU 2183 2071
BG 1069 1044
CA 1211 1049
CH 1037 1036
CL 1505 1496
CZ 1276 1156
DE-E 437 436
DE-W 850 849
DK 1322 1154
ES 1212 1165
FI 1379 1262
FR 1669 1611
GB-GBN 873 872
HU 1021 1018
IE 1065 1016
IL-A 152 145
IL-J 1066 1044
JP 1102 1076
KR 1315 1300
LV 1000 977
NL 1823 1759
NO 1469 1394
NZ 1036 1022
PH 1200 1200
PL 1277 1277
PT 1602 1592
RU 2383 2360
SE 1186 1116
SI 1093 1087
SK 1152 1097
TW 2016 2015
US 1216 1216
UY 1108 1108
VE 1199
ZA 2483
N Sum 45993
N Valid Sum 41014
page 195
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
0 No formal qualification
1 Lowest formal qualification
2 Above lowest qualification
3 Higher secondary completed
4 Above higher secondary level
5 University degree completed
8 Don't know
9 No answer
in Switzerland (CH):
7 Other education
page 196
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 197
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44987 97.8
1 Compulsory school without apprenticeship 202 0.4 20.1
2 Compulsory school with apprenticeship 358 0.8 35.7
3 Middle school vocational 148 0.3 14.7
4 Secondary general completed, Matura 88 0.2 8.8
5 Higher vocational, technical school 102 0.2 10.2
6 University 106 0.2 10.6
99 NA M 2 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1004
page 198
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AU_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43810 95.3
1 Did not complete High School to Year 10 337 0.7 15.8
2 Completed High School to Year 10 342 0.7 16.0
3 Completed High School to Year 12 255 0.6 11.9
4 Trade qualification or apprenticeship 263 0.6 12.3
5 Certificate or Diploma (TAFE or business college) 465 1.0 21.8
6 Bachelor Degree (including Honors) 279 0.6 13.1
7 Postgraduate Degree or Postgraduate Diploma 194 0.4 9.1
99 NA M 48 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2135
page 199
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
BG_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44924 97.7
2 Primary 99 0.2 9.3
3 Lower secondary 265 0.6 24.9
4 Upper secondary 187 0.4 17.6
5 Secondary technical 300 0.7 28.2
6 College 50 0.1 4.7
7 Higher 130 0.3 12.2
8 University and higher 13 0.0 1.2
97 No formal schooling 20 0.0 1.9
99 NA M 5 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1064
page 200
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CA_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44782 97.4
2 Some grade school 25 0.1 2.1
3 Finshed grade school 52 0.1 4.4
4 Some high school 136 0.3 11.4
5 Finished high school 299 0.7 25.1
6 College/CEGEP/some university 357 0.8 30.0
7 Completed university 205 0.4 17.2
8 Graduate studies 110 0.2 9.2
97 None, still at school, university 7 0.0 0.6
99 NA,refused M 20 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1191
page 201
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 202
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CH_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44956 97.7
1 Incomplete compulsory education 7 0.0 0.7
2 Compulsory education 110 0.2 10.6
3 Elementary vocational training (enterprise + school) 36 0.1 3.5
4 Secondary education (maturity, teacher training college) 72 0.2 7.0
5 Graduation diploma school (vocational maturity) 19 0.0 1.8
6 1 year: trade school,adm educ,domestic science/ling course 33 0.1 3.2
7 Apprenticeship 361 0.8 34.9
8 2 to 3 years: general training school, administrative edu 23 0.1 2.2
9 2 to 3 years: full time vocational education 53 0.1 5.1
10 Higher vocational education, federal diploma 90 0.2 8.7
11 Tech or vocational college (2 yrs full time/3 yrs part time) 24 0.1 2.3
12 Advanced tech college (3 yrs full time/4 yrs part time) 72 0.2 7.0
13 University (3 years, short bachelor degree) 12 0.0 1.2
14 University, tech uni (4 yrs and more, bachelor degree) 71 0.2 6.9
15 University, tech higher spec uni (masters, post-grade) 46 0.1 4.4
97 Other education 6 0.0 0.6
98 Don't know M 1 0.0
99 NA M 1 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1035
page 203
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CZ_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44717 97.2
1 Incomplete primary 6 0.0 0.5
2 Primary completed 158 0.3 12.6
3 Lower vocational 364 0.8 29.0
4 General sec.,no diploma 120 0.3 9.6
5 Vocational, upper diploma 65 0.1 5.2
6 Technical secondary 262 0.6 20.9
7 Academic secondary 116 0.3 9.2
8 Higher education 31 0.1 2.5
9 Tertiary,bachelor 28 0.1 2.2
10 Tertiary,master degree 95 0.2 7.6
11 Post-graduate education 11 0.0 0.9
99 NA M 20 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1256
page 204
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DE_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44706 97.2
2 School left without qualification 31 0.1 2.4
3 Lower secondary (Hauptschule) 504 1.1 39.2
4 Middle school (Mittlere Reife) 415 0.9 32.3
5 Secondary technical (Fachhochschulreife) 49 0.1 3.8
6 Higher secondary (Abitur) 95 0.2 7.4
7 Special university qualification (Fachhochschulabschluss) 64 0.1 5.0
8 University 111 0.2 8.6
9 Other qualification 3 0.0 0.2
97 Still at school 13 0.0 1.0
99 NA, refused M 2 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1285
page 205
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DK_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44671 97.1
1 7 years primary school or shorter 197 0.4 15.2
2 8 years primary school 64 0.1 4.9
3 9 years primary school or similar 138 0.3 10.7
4 10 years primary school or similar 308 0.7 23.8
5 Gymnasium, general 350 0.8 27.1
6 Gymnasium, technical & commercial 151 0.3 11.7
7 Other 85 0.2 6.6
99 No Answer M 29 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1293
page 206
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ES_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44781 97.4
1 Incpl primary 162 0.4 13.4
2 Primary compl 224 0.5 18.5
3 Incpl secondary 319 0.7 26.4
4 Vocational school 116 0.3 9.6
5 Secondary compl 88 0.2 7.3
6 COU - PREU 91 0.2 7.5
7 Incpl university 93 0.2 7.7
8 University compl 99 0.2 8.2
97 None 18 0.0 1.5
99 NA M 2 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1210
page 207
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FR_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44324 96.4
2 Primary incomplete 44 0.1 2.7
3 Primary completed 161 0.4 9.8
4 Gen. sec. lev 1 111 0.2 6.7
5 Vocat.sec. lev 1 300 0.7 18.2
6 Voc. sec. lev 2 68 0.1 4.1
7 Incpl gen.sec. lev 2 125 0.3 7.6
8 Gen.sec.lev 2 115 0.3 7.0
9 College 241 0.5 14.6
10 University 451 1.0 27.4
97 None 32 0.1 1.9
99 NA M 21 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1648
page 208
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
GB_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 45120 98.1
2 CSE or equivalent 104 0.2 11.9
3 O-level or equivalent 163 0.4 18.7
4 A-level or equivalent 122 0.3 14.0
5 Higher below degree level 115 0.3 13.2
6 Degree, university o CNAA o diploma 129 0.3 14.8
7 Foreign or other 11 0.0 1.3
97 No sec. qualifications 228 0.5 26.1
99 DK, NA M 1 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 872
page 209
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
HU_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44972 97.8
2 Less than primary 99 0.2 9.7
3 8 years elementary 248 0.5 24.4
4 Vocational 252 0.5 24.8
6 Sec. technical+matura 137 0.3 13.5
7 Gymnasium, matura 100 0.2 9.8
8 College 132 0.3 13.0
9 University 50 0.1 4.9
99 NA M 3 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1018
page 210
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
IL_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44775 97.4
1 primary 62 0.1 5.1
2 Incpl vocational 44 0.1 3.6
3 Vocational compl 83 0.2 6.9
4 Vocational with matriculation 87 0.2 7.2
5 Incpl academic 57 0.1 4.7
6 academic compl 64 0.1 5.3
7 academic with matriculation 172 0.4 14.2
8 Yeshiva 11 0.0 0.9
9 Yeshiva with matriculation 3 0.0 0.2
10 post secondary 199 0.4 16.5
11 Incpl university 90 0.2 7.4
12 university compl (BA or more) 317 0.7 26.2
97 No formal education 20 0.0 1.7
99 NA M 9 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1209
page 211
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
IE_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44928 97.7
2 Incomplete primary 31 0.1 2.9
3 Primary complete 167 0.4 15.7
4 Incomplete first cycle secondary 63 0.1 5.9
5 Complete first cycle secondary 177 0.4 16.6
6 Secondary complete 301 0.7 28.3
7 Incomplete third level 53 0.1 5.0
8 Cert or Diploma 103 0.2 9.7
9 University first degree 98 0.2 9.2
10 University degree Masters or higher 65 0.1 6.1
97 None 7 0.0 0.7
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1065
page 212
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
JP_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44891 97.6
1 Secondary completed 248 0.5 22.9
2 High school completed 483 1.1 44.7
3 Junior college compl 135 0.3 12.5
4 Finished university 148 0.3 13.7
5 Still at High school 38 0.1 3.5
6 Still at Junior college 28 0.1 2.6
7 Others 1 0.0 0.1
99 NA M 21 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1081
page 213
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
KR_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44678 97.1
1 Elementary incompleted 22 0.0 1.7
2 Elementary completed 85 0.2 6.5
3 Middle school incompleted 16 0.0 1.2
4 Middle school completed 107 0.2 8.2
5 High school incompleted 33 0.1 2.5
6 High school completed 405 0.9 31.2
7 Junior college incompleted 42 0.1 3.2
8 Junior college completed 125 0.3 9.6
9 University incompleted 117 0.3 9.0
10 University completed 242 0.5 18.6
11 Graduate school incompleted 10 0.0 0.8
12 Graduate school completed 40 0.1 3.1
97 No formal schooling 56 0.1 4.3
99 NA M 15 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1300
page 214
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
LV_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 45993 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 0.0
Valid Cases 0
page 215
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NL_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44170 96.0
1 None, incomplete primary 16 0.0 0.9
2 Primary compl,basic educ,compuls 138 0.3 7.7
3 Lower vocational, LBO-VBO-VMBob 291 0.6 16.2
4 Lower academic, MAVO-MULO-VMBot 240 0.5 13.4
5 Middle academic, HAVO-MMS 102 0.2 5.7
6 Higher acad, VWO-HBS-Athen-Gymn 88 0.2 4.9
7 Middle vocational, MBO 317 0.7 17.7
8 Higher vocational, HBO 437 1.0 24.4
9 University competed 163 0.4 9.1
99 NA M 31 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1792
page 216
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NO_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44524 96.8
1 Primary 145 0.3 10.0
2 Sec. vocational, inc 91 0.2 6.3
3 Sec. academic, inc 148 0.3 10.2
4 Sec. voc., compl 225 0.5 15.5
5 Sec. acad., compl 256 0.6 17.7
6 Univ.,coll. <1 year 43 0.1 3.0
7 Univ., coll. 1-2 yrs 118 0.3 8.2
8 Univ., coll. 3-4 yrs 274 0.6 18.9
9 Univ., coll. >= 5 yrs 147 0.3 10.2
99 NA M 22 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1447
page 217
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NZ_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44957 97.7
2 School qualifications only 265 0.6 26.4
3 Trade or professional cert 228 0.5 22.7
4 Diploma below Bachelors 101 0.2 10.1
5 Bachelors degree 97 0.2 9.7
6 Post-grad or higher 62 0.1 6.2
97 No formal qualification 250 0.5 24.9
99 NA M 33 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1003
page 218
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PL_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44716 97.2
2 Incomplete elementary 42 0.1 3.3
3 Elementary 279 0.6 21.8
4 Basic vocational 353 0.8 27.6
5 Incomplete secondary 51 0.1 4.0
6 Secondary general 95 0.2 7.4
7 Secondary vocational 232 0.5 18.2
8 Post secondary 44 0.1 3.4
9 Incomplete higher 25 0.1 2.0
10 Completed higher 151 0.3 11.8
97 No formal schooling 5 0.0 0.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1277
page 219
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PT_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44391 96.5
1 Basic -level 1 693 1.5 43.4
2 Basic-levels 2 and 3 283 0.6 17.7
3 Secondary incomplete 195 0.4 12.2
4 Complete secondary 85 0.2 5.3
5 University incomplete 99 0.2 6.2
6 Complete university 140 0.3 8.8
97 No formal qualification 101 0.2 6.3
98 DK M 1 0.0
99 NA M 5 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1596
page 220
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CL_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44488 96.7
2 Incomplete primary 331 0.7 22.1
3 Primary completed 149 0.3 10.0
4 Incomplete secondary 194 0.4 13.0
5 Secondary completed 382 0.8 25.5
6 University incompleted 87 0.2 5.8
7 University completed 136 0.3 9.1
8 Incompl non-university higher 43 0.1 2.9
9 Completed non-university higher 125 0.3 8.4
97 None 50 0.1 3.3
99 NA M 8 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1497
page 221
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PH_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44793 97.4
2 Incomplete primary 121 0.3 10.1
3 Primary completed 148 0.3 12.3
4 Incomplete secondary 160 0.3 13.3
5 Secondary completed 314 0.7 26.2
6 Some Vocational 26 0.1 2.2
7 Completed vocational 59 0.1 4.9
8 Some college 170 0.4 14.2
9 Completed college 169 0.4 14.1
10 Post college 9 0.0 0.8
97 None 24 0.1 2.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1200
page 222
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
RU_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43610 94.8
2 Incompleted primary 2 0.0 0.1
3 Primary completed 103 0.2 4.3
4 Incompleted secondary 355 0.8 14.9
5 Secondary completed 1148 2.5 48.2
6 Semi-higher, incompleted university 57 0.1 2.4
7 University comleted 490 1.1 20.6
97 None, still at school, university 228 0.5 9.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2383
page 223
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SE_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44807 97.4
1 Primary or comprehensive 255 0.6 21.9
2 Vocational school (1972-92) 137 0.3 11.7
3 Vocational school (post 1992) 50 0.1 4.3
4 Vocational school (pre 1972) 86 0.2 7.4
5 Alternative secondary school 24 0.1 2.1
6 Lower secondary school 48 0.1 4.1
7 3 o 4 yr gymnasium 130 0.3 11.1
8 Gymnasium (academic) 28 0.1 2.4
9 Higher sec. school 32 0.1 2.7
10 University studies without degree 115 0.3 9.9
11 University degree 262 0.6 22.5
99 NA M 19 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1167
page 224
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FI_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44614 97.0
2 Primary school 175 0.4 13.0
3 Comprehensive (primary + lower secondary) school 98 0.2 7.3
4 Post-comprehensive vocational school or course 297 0.6 22.0
5 Post-comprehensive upper secondary school 135 0.3 10.0
6 Post-comprehensive vocational college 305 0.7 22.6
7 Polytechnic 66 0.1 4.9
8 University, lower academic degree (BA) 60 0.1 4.4
9 University, higher academic degree (MA) 147 0.3 10.9
97 None; still at school (comprehensive,upper second., vocat.) 68 0.1 5.0
99 NA M 28 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1351
page 225
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SK_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44841 97.5
1 Incomplete primary 89 0.2 8.1
2 Primary completed 347 0.8 31.6
3 General sec.,no diploma 365 0.8 33.3
4 General secondary 91 0.2 8.3
5 Tertiary,master degree 196 0.4 17.9
97 No formal education 9 0.0 0.8
99 NA M 55 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1097
page 226
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SI_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44900 97.6
1 Incomplete primary 58 0.1 5.3
2 Primary completed 221 0.5 20.3
3 Incomplete vocational 27 0.1 2.5
4 2-3 yrs vocational 276 0.6 25.4
5 4 yrs middle school 322 0.7 29.6
6 Incomplete university 27 0.1 2.5
7 Higher degree compl 51 0.1 4.7
8 University compl 106 0.2 9.7
99 NA M 5 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1088
page 227
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
TW_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43977 95.6
2 Self-study 21 0.0 1.0
3 Elementary school 363 0.8 18.0
4 Junior high schoolVocational junior high school 281 0.6 13.9
5 High school(general subject)High school(vocational subject 540 1.2 26.8
6 Five-year vocational school(after junior high) 72 0.2 3.6
7 two-year vocation school(after vocational high school) 208 0.5 10.3
8 Three-year vocational school(after high school of general su 24 0.1 1.2
9 Cadet school 4 0.0 0.2
10 Military/Police training course 5 0.0 0.2
11 Military/Police specialist courseMilitary/Police officers 24 0.1 1.2
12 College 252 0.5 12.5
13 Graduate school(M.A. degree) 54 0.1 2.7
14 Graduate school(Ph.D degree) 9 0.0 0.4
15 Other 1 0.0 0.0
97 None 158 0.3 7.8
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2016
page 228
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
US_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44777 97.4
1 LT high school 135 0.3 11.1
2 High school 608 1.3 50.0
3 Junior college 104 0.2 8.6
4 Bachelor 249 0.5 20.5
5 Graduate 120 0.3 9.9
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1216
page 229
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
UY_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44885 97.6
2 Incomplete primary school 139 0.3 12.5
3 Completed primary school 209 0.5 18.9
4 Incomplete secondary 289 0.6 26.1
5 Completed secondary 112 0.2 10.1
6 Incomplete technical education 57 0.1 5.1
7 Completed technical education 74 0.2 6.7
8 Incomplete university 88 0.2 7.9
9 Completed university 69 0.2 6.2
10 Incomplete non university high education 14 0.0 1.3
11 Completed non university high education 39 0.1 3.5
97 None 18 0.0 1.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1108
page 230
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
VE_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44794 97.4
1 Before primary school 4 0.0 0.3
2 Basic school (1-9) / Primary (1-6) 608 1.3 50.8
3 Special education 1 0.0 0.1
4 High school (1-2) 209 0.5 17.5
5 Technical school (1-3) 34 0.1 2.8
6 Secondary school (1-5) 46 0.1 3.8
7 University Technician 92 0.2 7.7
8 University 157 0.3 13.1
97 None 45 0.1 3.8
98 Don't know M 2 0.0
99 NA M 1 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1196
page 231
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 232
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ZA_DEGR
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43510 94.6
1 Grade 0 5 0.0 0.2
2 Sub A/Grade 1 29 0.1 1.2
3 Sub B/Grade 2 25 0.1 1.0
4 Grade 3/Standard 1 54 0.1 2.2
5 Grade 4/Standard 2 65 0.1 2.6
6 Grade 5/Standard 3 102 0.2 4.1
7 Grade 6/Standard 4 122 0.3 5.0
8 Grade 7/Standard 5 168 0.4 6.8
9 Grade 8/Standard 6/Form 1 230 0.5 9.3
10 Grade 9/Standard 7/Form 2 168 0.4 6.8
11 Grade 10/Standard 8/Form 3 273 0.6 11.1
12 Grade 11/Standard 9/Form 4 188 0.4 7.6
13 Grade 12/Standard 10/Form 5/Matric 534 1.2 21.7
14 NTC I 5 0.0 0.2
15 NTC II 7 0.0 0.3
16 NTC III 9 0.0 0.4
17 Diploma/certificate with<Grade 12/Std 10 35 0.1 1.4
18 Diploma/certificate with Grade 12/Std 10 80 0.2 3.3
19 Degree 71 0.2 2.9
20 Postgraduate degree or diploma 65 0.1 2.6
21 Other, specify 26 0.1 1.1
97 No schooling 200 0.4 8.1
98 Do not know M 1 0.0
99 NA M 21 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2461
page 233
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
1 Full-time employed
2 Part-time employed
3 Employed less than part-time
4 Helping family member
5 Unemployed
6 Student, school, vocational training
7 Retired
8 Housewife, home duties
9 Permanently disabled
10 Other, not in labour force
97 Refused
98 Don't know
99 No answer
in Poland (PL):
3 Seasonal or commission work, odd jobs
page 234
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 235
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 1006 1004
AU 2183 2161
BG 1069 1064
CA 1211 1181
CH 1037 1030
CL 1505 1501
CZ 1276 1248
DE-E 437 437
DE-W 850 849
DK 1322 1291
ES 1212 1212
FI 1379 1338
FR 1669 1668
GB-GBN 873 873
HU 1021 1018
IE 1065 1065
IL-A 152 152
IL-J 1066 1053
JP 1102 1072
KR 1315 1311
LV 1000 1000
NL 1823 1756
NO 1469 1423
NZ 1036 1015
PH 1200 1195
PL 1277 1277
PT 1602 1601
RU 2383 2383
SE 1186 1178
SI 1093 1079
SK 1152 1127
TW 2016 2011
US 1216 1215
UY 1108 1108
VE 1199 1197
ZA 2483 2483
N Sum 45993
N Valid Sum 45576
page 236
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
0 NAP: not in paid work, never had a job, unemployed, not in labour force
1 1 hour
96 96 and more
97 Refused
98 Don't know, can't say, varies too much
99 No answer
in France (FR):
90 90 and more
page 237
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
This variable contains the International Occupation Codes of 1988 (Source: ILO/ ISCO 1988 International Standard
Classification of Occupations: International Labour Office, Geneva 1991).
1, 2 and 3 digit ISCO codes are included with trailing zeros to complete four digits. In this way, some countries providing 3-digit
ISCO codes only could also be included. Country specific codes were recoded to the 3 digit category to which they belong or, if
it didn't exist, to the 2 or 1 digit category (for example country specific German code 7243 was recoded to 7240).
page 238
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 239
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 240
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 241
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 242
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 243
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 244
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 245
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 246
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 247
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 248
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Hungary (HU):
1250 Miscelaneous officers
1251 High-grad military officer
1252 Low-grade commissioned officer
Note:
Venezuela (VE) used a different notation. France (FR) used 3-digit ISCO. South-Africa (ZA) used 1-digit ISCO.
page 249
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Bulgaria (BG):
5 Cooperative firm
page 250
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 251
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Germany (DE):
9 number of employees for academics and self-employed 2-9
10 farmer up to 10 ha
11 farmer 10 ha -< 20 ha
12 farmer 20 ha -< 50 ha
13 farmer >=50 ha
49 number of employees for academics and self-employed 10-49
50 number of employees for academics and self-employed 50+
in AT ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 252
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 253
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 254
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in France (FR):
2 Not a member
page 255
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 256
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Poland (PL):
3 Seasonal or commission work, odd jobs
in NO VE:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 257
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 258
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 259
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
This variable contains the International Occupation Codes of 1988 (Source: ILO/ ISCO 1988 International Standard
Classification of Occupations: International Labour Office, Geneva 1991).
1, 2 and 3 digit ISCO codes are included with trailing zeros to complete four digits. In this way, some countries providing 3-digit
ISCO codes only could also be included. Country specific codes were recoded to the 3 digit category to which they belong or, if
it didn't exist, to the 2 or 1 digit category (for example country specific German code 7243 was recoded to 7240).
page 260
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 261
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 262
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 263
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 264
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 265
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 266
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 267
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 268
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 269
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 270
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Hungary (HU):
1250 Miscelaneous officers
1251 High-grad military officer
1252 Low-grade commissioned officer
in Japan (JP):
0 Not available
Note:
Venezuela (VE) used a different notation. France (FR) used 3-digit ISCO. South-Africa (ZA) used 1-digit ISCO.
page 271
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in BG CA IL NO US ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 272
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 273
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
RINCOME - R: Earnings
Respondent earnings in [Country] currency
This variable is country specific, even if it is integrated in the same variable. Some countries have coded the income as
midpoints of intervals that were asked to respondents. Unless specified otherwise, values are monthly incomes.
Each country provided values in their own currency. An approximate exchange rate to the Euro at the field time is given for
conversion purposes only (no conversion is provided within data itself).
page 274
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Canada (CA):
7500 Under $15000
20000 $15000 to $24999
30000 $25000 to $34999
40000 $35000 to $44999
50000 $45000 to $54999
60000 $55000 to $64999
70000 $65000 to $74999
80000 $75000 and more
in Chile (CL):
17500 Less than $35000
45000 $35001 to $56000
58000 $56001 to $78000
89500 $78001 to $101000
127500 $101001 to $134000
156500 $134001 to $179000
201500 $179001 to $224000
257500 $224001 to $291000
324500 $291001 to $358000
403000 $358001 to $448000
724000 $448001 to $1000000
1500000 $1000001 to $2000000
2500000 $2000001 to $3000000
3500000 More than $3000000
in Denmark (DK):
50000 below dkr 100000
125000 dkr 100000 to 149999
175000 dkr 150000 to 199999
225000 dkr 200000 to 249999
275000 dkr 250000 to 299999
350000 dkr 300000 to 399999
450000 dkr 400000 to 499999
550000 dkr 500000 to 599999
650000 dkr 600000 to 699999
750000 dkr 700000 to 799999
850000 dkr 800000 to 899999
950000 dkr 900000 to 999999
1050000 dkr 1 million or more
page 275
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Spain (ES):
150 Up to 300 euros
375 301 to 450 euros
525 451 to 600 euros
750 601to 900 euros
1050 901 to 1200 euros
1425 1201 to 1650 euros
1875 1651 to 2100 euros
2550 2101 to 3000 euros
4500 3001 euros and more
in Portugal (PT):
175 up to 350 euros
425 351 to 500 euros
650 501 to 800 euros
1150 801 to 1500 euros
2000 1501 to 2500 euros
5000 more than 2500 euros
in Taiwan (TW):
5000 TWN less than 9999
15000 TWN 10000 to 19999
25000 TWN 20000 to 29999
35000 TWN 30000 to 39999
45000 TWN 40000 to 49999
55000 TWN 50000 to 59999
65000 TWN 60000 to 69999
page 276
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Uruguay (UY):
1500 Less than $3000
4500 $3000 to $5999
6750 $6000 to $7499
8500 $7500 to $9499
8750 R7501 to R10000
10500 $9500 to $11499
12500 $11500 to $13499
15000 $13500 to $16499
18500 $16500 to $20499
23500 $20500 to $26499
32750 $26500 to $38999
58500 More than $39000
page 277
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
This variable is country specific, even if it is integrated in the same variable. Some countries have coded the income as
midpoints of intervals that were asked to respondents. Unless specified otherwise, values are monthly incomes.
Each country provided values in their own currency. An approximate exchange rate to the Euro at the field time is given for
conversion purposes only (no conversion is provided within data itself).
page 278
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Canada (CA):
7500 Under $15000
20000 $15000 to $24999
30000 $25000 to $34999
40000 $35000 to $44999
50000 $45000 to $54999
60000 $55000 to $64999
70000 $65000 to $74999
80000 $75000 and more
in Chile (CL):
17500 Less than $35000
45000 $35001 to $56000
58000 $56001 to $78000
89500 $78001 to $101000
127500 $101001 to $134000
156500 $134001 to $179000
201500 $179001 to $224000
257500 $224001 to $291000
324500 $291001 to $358000
403000 $358001 to $448000
724000 $448001 to $1000000
1500000 $1000001 to $2000000
2500000 $2000001 to $3000000
3500000 More than $3000000
in Denmark (DK):
50000 below dkr 100000
125000 dkr 100000 to 149999
175000 dkr 150000 to 199999
225000 dkr 200000 to 249999
275000 dkr 250000 to 299999
350000 dkr 300000 to 399999
450000 dkr 400000 to 499999
550000 dkr 500000 to 599999
650000 dkr 600000 to 699999
750000 dkr 700000 to 799999
850000 dkr 800000 to 899999
950000 dkr 900000 to 999999
1050000 dkr 1 million or more
page 279
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Spain (ES):
150 Up to 300 euros
375 301 to 450 euros
525 451 to 600 euros
750 601 to 900 euros
1050 901 to 1200 euros
1425 1201 to 1650 euros
1875 1651 to 2100 euros
2550 2101 to 3000 euros
4500 3001 euros and more
in Portugal (PT):
175 Up to 350 euros
425 351 to 500 euros
650 501 to 800 euros
1150 801 to 1500 euros
2000 1501 to 2500 euros
5000 more than 2500 euros
in Taiwan (TW):
5000 less than TWN 9999
15000 TWN 10000 to 19999
25000 TWN 20000 to 29999
35000 TWN 30000 to 39999
45000 TWN 40000 to 49999
55000 TWN 50000 to 59999
65000 TWN 60000 to 69999
page 280
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Uruguay (UY):
1500 Less than $3000
4500 $3000 to $5999
6750 $6000 to $7499
8500 $7500 to $9499
10500 $9500 to $11499
12500 $11500 to $13499
15000 $13500 to $16499
18500 $16500 to $20499
23500 $20500 to $26499
32750 $26500 to $38999
58500 More than $39000
page 281
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Spain (ES):
9 9 or more persons
in Sweden (SE):
8 8 persons or more
in Venezuela (VE):
2 2 persons or more
page 282
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 283
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
HOMPOP 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 24 26 27 50 98 99
C_ALPHAN
M M
AT
AU 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 34
BG 1 (0.1) 3 (0.3) 1 (0.1) 18
CA 78
CH 2
CL 3 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
CZ 26
DE-E
DE-W 1
DK 4
ES 2
FI 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 26
FR
GB-GBN 1 (0.1)
HU 1 (0.1)
IE 1 (0.1)
IL-A
IL-J 5 (0.5) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 20
JP 12
KR
LV
NL 1 (0.1) 63
NO 1 (0.1) 27
NZ 1 (0.1) 10
PH 10 (0.8) 9 (0.8) 6 (0.5) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
PL 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
PT 1 (0.1)
RU 2 (0.1)
SE 30
SI 1
SK 1 (0.1) 8
TW 10 (0.5) 18 (0.9) 10 (0.5) 2 (0.1) 5 (0.2) 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 3
US
UY 2 (0.2) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
VE 2
ZA
N Sum 37 38 25 8 9 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 364
N Valid Sum 37 38 25 8 9 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1
page 284
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 1006 1006
AU 2183 2149
BG 1069 1051
CA 1211 1133
CH 1037 1035
CL 1505 1505
CZ 1276 1250
DE-E 437 437
DE-W 850 849
DK 1322 1318
ES 1212 1210
FI 1379 1353
FR 1669 1669
GB-GBN 873 873
HU 1021 1021
IE 1065 1065
IL-A 152 152
IL-J 1066 1046
JP 1102 1090
KR 1315 1315
LV 1000 1000
NL 1823 1760
NO 1469 1442
NZ 1036 1026
PH 1200 1200
PL 1277 1277
PT 1602 1602
RU 2383 2383
SE 1186 1156
SI 1093 1092
SK 1152 1144
TW 2016 2013
US 1216 1216
UY 1108 1108
VE 1199 1197
ZA 2483
N Sum 45993
N Valid Sum 43143
page 285
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
1 Single household
2 1 adult, 1 child
3 1 adult, 2 children
4 1 adult, 3 or more children
5 2 adults
6 2 adults, 1 child
7 2 adults, 2 children
8 2 adults, 3 or more children
9 3 adults
10 3 adults + children
11 4 adults
12 4 adults + children
13 5 adults
14 5 adults + children
15 6 adults
16 6 adults + children
17 7 adults
18 7 adults + children
19 8 adults
20 8 adults + children
21 9 adults
22 9 adults + children
23 10 adults
24 10 adults + children
25 11 adults
26 11 adults + children
27 12 adults
28 12 adults + children
95 Otherwise
99 No answer, refused
in Bulgaria (BG):
13 Other
in SI ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 286
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 287
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
HHCYCLE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
C_ALPHAN
page 288
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 289
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in CL IL TW ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 290
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 291
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 601
AU 2139
BG 883
CA 1150
CH 1006
CL
CZ 652
DE-E 333
DE-W 632
DK 1138
ES 972
FI 998
FR 1234
GB-GBN 829
HU 757
IE 819
IL-A
IL-J
JP 1041
KR 1213
LV 326
NL 1783
NO 1260
NZ 783
PH 1080
PL 606
PT 1405
RU 1599
SE 1121
SI 846
SK 838
TW
US 1211
UY 1046
VE 1046
ZA
N Sum
N Valid Sum 31347
page 292
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 45052 98.0
1 SPOE (Soc-Democr) 238 0.5 34.3
2 OEVP (Cons) 216 0.5 31.1
3 FPOE (Liberal) 62 0.1 8.9
4 GRUENE (Green) 80 0.2 11.5
95 Other party 5 0.0 0.7
96 Would not vote 93 0.2 13.4
97 Refused M 29 0.1
99 NA M 218 0.5
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 694
page 293
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AU_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43810 95.3
1 Liberal Party 691 1.5 32.3
2 Labour Party 750 1.6 35.0
3 National Party 60 0.1 2.8
4 Democrats 53 0.1 2.5
5 Greens 107 0.2 5.0
6 One nation 41 0.1 1.9
95 Other Party 4 0.0 0.2
96 None 434 0.9 20.3
99 NA, refused M 43 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2140
page 294
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
BG_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 45993 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 0.0
Valid Cases 0
page 295
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CA_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44782 97.4
1 New Democratic Party 101 0.2 8.8
2 Liberal 446 1.0 38.8
3 Conservative 202 0.4 17.6
4 Bloq Quebecois 71 0.2 6.2
95 Other Party 105 0.2 9.1
96 No party preference 225 0.5 19.6
99 NA, refused M 61 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1150
page 296
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CH_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44956 97.7
1 Christian Democratic Party 46 0.1 4.6
2 Evangelical Peoples Party 6 0.0 0.6
3 Radical Party 93 0.2 9.2
4 Social Democratic Party 147 0.3 14.6
5 Swiss Peoples Party 69 0.2 6.9
6 Independent Party 2 0.0 0.2
7 Liberal Party 9 0.0 0.9
8 Labour Party 5 0.0 0.5
9 Swiss Democrats 7 0.0 0.7
10 Green Party 62 0.1 6.2
95 Other Party 8 0.0 0.8
96 No party preference 552 1.2 54.9
98 Not interested so much in politics M 11 0.0
99 NA M 20 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1006
page 297
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 298
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CZ_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44717 97.2
1 CSSD Social Democrats 125 0.3 19.2
2 ODA Civil Democratic Alliance 8 0.0 1.2
3 Nadeje Hope 5 0.0 0.8
4 RMS Republicans of Miroslav Sladek 6 0.0 0.9
5 CSNS Czech National Social Praty 2 0.0 0.3
6 SV-SOS party of the Countryside-United Civil Powers 3 0.0 0.5
7 Association of Independens 25 0.1 3.8
8 ODS Civic Democratic 251 0.5 38.5
9 KSCM Communist Party 107 0.2 16.4
10 KDU-CSL Christian Dem Party-Czechoslovak Peoples P 67 0.1 10.3
11 US-DEU Freedom Union - Democratic Union 13 0.0 2.0
12 SZJ Party for Life Securities 11 0.0 1.7
13 PB Right Block 8 0.0 1.2
14 SZ Party of Greens 13 0.0 2.0
95 Other Party 8 0.0 1.2
97 Refused M 214 0.5
98 Don't know M 265 0.6
99 NA M 145 0.3
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 652
page 299
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DE_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44706 97.2
1 CDU/ CSU 347 0.8 33.5
2 SPD 188 0.4 18.2
3 FDP 68 0.1 6.6
4 Buendnis 90/Gruene 83 0.2 8.0
7 Republikaner 13 0.0 1.3
8 PDS/Linke Liste 58 0.1 5.6
95 Other Party 11 0.0 1.1
96 Would not vote;not eligible 267 0.6 25.8
97 Refused M 48 0.1
98 Don't know M 204 0.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1035
page 300
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DK_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44755 97.3
1 Social Democratic P 328 0.7 28.8
2 Radical Liberal P 83 0.2 7.3
3 Conservative P 88 0.2 7.7
4 Centre Democratic 13 0.0 1.1
5 Socialist Peoples P 91 0.2 8.0
6 Danish Peoples Prty 85 0.2 7.5
7 Christian Peoples P 18 0.0 1.6
9 Liberal 387 0.8 34.0
10 Progressive 4 0.0 0.4
11 Leftwing Alliance 29 0.1 2.5
95 Other Party 3 0.0 0.3
96 No preference,no vote 9 0.0 0.8
98 Don't know M 77 0.2
99 NA M 23 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1138
page 301
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ES_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44781 97.4
1 Popular Party (Partido Popular - PP) 332 0.7 32.2
2 Socialist Party (Partido Socialista Obrero Español - PSOE) 369 0.8 35.8
3 Communist Party (Izquierda Unida - IU) 65 0.1 6.3
4 Regional Party of Center (Part Nac de Centro y Derecha) 52 0.1 5.0
5 Regional Party of Left (Partidos Nacionalistas de Izquierda) 33 0.1 3.2
6 Ecologist Party (Ecologistas - Verdes) 19 0.0 1.8
94 White (En Blanco) 27 0.1 2.6
95 Other Party (Otros) 2 0.0 0.2
96 No vote (No votará) 133 0.3 12.9
98 Don't know (NS) M 105 0.2
99 No answer (NC) M 75 0.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1032
page 302
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FR_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44324 96.4
1 Far left 38 0.1 2.5
2 Communist party 49 0.1 3.3
3 Socialist party 332 0.7 22.1
4 Green 150 0.3 10.0
5 UDF-Center Right 125 0.3 8.3
6 UMP-Conservative 356 0.8 23.7
7 National Front 68 0.1 4.5
95 Other Party 17 0.0 1.1
96 No preference 367 0.8 24.4
97 Refused M 73 0.2
99 NA M 94 0.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1502
page 303
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
GB_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 45120 98.1
1 Conservative 227 0.5 27.4
2 Labour 321 0.7 38.7
3 Liberal Democrats,SLD 104 0.2 12.5
6 SNP (Scot National) 12 0.0 1.4
7 Plaid Cymru 1 0.0 0.1
93 Other answer 7 0.0 0.8
95 Other Party 24 0.1 2.9
96 Would not vote;No party preference 133 0.3 16.0
98 Don't know M 31 0.1
99 NA M 13 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 829
page 304
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
HU_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44972 97.8
1 HDF-Hungarian Democratic Forum 16 0.0 1.7
2 FFD-Free Democrats 33 0.1 3.5
3 ISHP-Independent Small Holders 2 0.0 0.2
4 HSP-Hungarian Socialist Party 423 0.9 45.4
5 FYD-Federation of Young Democrats 255 0.6 27.4
7 HSPW-Socialist workers 6 0.0 0.6
8 HIJP-Hungarian Truth 13 0.0 1.4
95 Other Party 9 0.0 1.0
96 Would not vote;no party preference 174 0.4 18.7
97 Refused M 77 0.2
99 NA M 13 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 931
page 305
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 306
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
IL_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44775 97.4
1 Israel ahat 123 0.3 13.2
2 Likud 321 0.7 34.4
3 Shase 51 0.1 5.5
4 Meretz 71 0.2 7.6
5 Mafdal 50 0.1 5.4
6 Yahadut-hatora, Agudat-Isarel, Degel-hatora 56 0.1 6.0
7 Am ehad 6 0.0 0.6
8 Shinuy 97 0.2 10.4
9 Haehud haleumi 17 0.0 1.8
10 The center party 3 0.0 0.3
11 Israel baliya 4 0.0 0.4
12 Israel byteno 21 0.0 2.2
15 Tzomet 2 0.0 0.2
16 Gimlaim 3 0.0 0.3
21 Hadash 41 0.1 4.4
22 Balad 34 0.1 3.6
23 Tnua Haravit Leshinui 8 0.0 0.9
24 Hatnua Harabit Hameauhedet 22 0.0 2.4
26 Ale Yarok 4 0.0 0.4
97 Refused M 74 0.2
98 Don't know M 89 0.2
99 No answer M 121 0.3
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 934
page 307
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
0 NAP: Do not feel closer to one of the political parties/ Not applicable, other countries
1 Fianna Fail
2 Fine Gael
3 Labour
4 Progressive Democrats
5 Green Party
6 Socialist Party
7 Sinn Fein
95 Other Party
96 Would not vote; No party preference
97 Refused
98 Can't choose
99 No answer
IE_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP:N closer to one pol party;NAP, other countries M 45599 99.1
1 Fianna Fail 218 0.5 55.9
2 Fine Gael 83 0.2 21.3
3 Labour 39 0.1 10.0
4 Progressive Democrats 9 0.0 2.3
5 Green Party 10 0.0 2.6
6 Socialist Party 7 0.0 1.8
7 Sinn Fein 20 0.0 5.1
95 Other Party 4 0.0 1.0
99 NA M 4 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 390
page 308
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
JP_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44891 97.6
1 Liberal Democratic Party 348 0.8 33.4
2 The Democratic Party 140 0.3 13.4
4 New Komeito 42 0.1 4.0
5 Japanese Communist Party 19 0.0 1.8
6 Social Democratic Party 19 0.0 1.8
95 Other Party 1 0.0 0.1
96 No party preference 472 1.0 45.3
99 NA M 61 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1041
page 309
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
KR_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44678 97.1
1 United Liberal Democrats 12 0.0 1.0
2 Grand National Party 226 0.5 18.3
3 National Alliance 21 22 0.0 1.8
4 Millennium Democratic Party 249 0.5 20.1
5 People's Party for Reform 18 0.0 1.5
6 Democratic Labor Party 65 0.1 5.3
7 The Uri Party 5 0.0 0.4
95 Other party 6 0.0 0.5
96 No party affiliation 635 1.4 51.3
98 DK M 77 0.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1238
page 310
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 311
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
LV_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44993 97.8
1 Alliance "Tçvzemei un Brîvîbai"/LNNK 18 0.0 2.3
2 The political organisation "For Human Rights in United Latvia" 63 0.1 8.2
3 Social-democratic Welfare Party 2 0.0 0.3
5 Latvian Social Democratic Workers' Party (LSDSP) 11 0.0 1.4
7 Jaunais laiks 123 0.3 16.0
8 The People's Party 45 0.1 5.8
9 Latvia's First Party 17 0.0 2.2
13 Social Democratic Union (SDS) 2 0.0 0.3
15 Union - Latvia's Way 17 0.0 2.2
18 Latgales Gaisma 1 0.0 0.1
20 Political organisation "Green and Farmer Union" 27 0.1 3.5
96 No vote 445 1.0 57.7
97 Refused M 46 0.1
98 DK M 183 0.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 771
page 312
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NL_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44170 96.0
1 Labour Party-PvdA 400 0.9 22.4
2 Liberal Party-VVD 282 0.6 15.8
3 Christian Democratic-CDA 388 0.8 21.8
4 Democrats 66-D66 121 0.3 6.8
5 Calvinist State Prty-SGP 25 0.1 1.4
7 Calvinist Political Prty-CU 47 0.1 2.6
8 Green Left Party-GL 110 0.2 6.2
9 Centrum Democrats-CD 6 0.0 0.3
10 Socialist Party-SP 115 0.3 6.4
11 Union 55 Plus 4 0.0 0.2
13 Fortuyns Party-LPF 96 0.2 5.4
95 Other Party 22 0.0 1.2
96 Would not vote;not eligible 167 0.4 9.4
99 NA M 40 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1783
page 313
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NO_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44524 96.8
1 Red Electoral All 21 0.0 1.7
2 Labour Party 317 0.7 25.2
3 Progress Party 258 0.6 20.5
4 Conserv Party 198 0.4 15.7
5 Christ Democr Party 60 0.1 4.8
6 Centre party 78 0.2 6.2
7 Socialist Left 213 0.5 16.9
8 Liberal 35 0.1 2.8
95 Other Party 15 0.0 1.2
96 No party preference;wouldn't vote 65 0.1 5.2
98 Don't know M 186 0.4
99 NA M 23 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1260
page 314
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NZ_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44957 97.7
1 ACT 40 0.1 6.1
2 Alliance 9 0.0 1.4
3 Green 45 0.1 6.9
4 Labour 283 0.6 43.5
5 National 147 0.3 22.6
6 New Zealand First 67 0.1 10.3
7 Progressive Coalition 2 0.0 0.3
8 United Future 41 0.1 6.3
9 (Undocumented) 17 0.0 2.6
96 Didn't vote/not eligible M 65 0.1
98 Don't know/Can't remember M 47 0.1
99 NA M 273 0.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 651
page 315
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PL_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 45175 98.2
1 SLD-UP: Democratic left alliance/labour union 182 0.4 30.0
2 AWS: Solidarity election action 44 0.1 7.3
3 UW: Freedom union 57 0.1 9.4
4 Lepper's self-defense trade union 62 0.1 10.2
5 PiS: Law and justice party 63 0.1 10.4
6 PSL: Polish peasants party 46 0.1 7.6
7 PO: Civic platform of the rep of Poland 85 0.2 14.0
9 PWN: Polish national fellowship 1 0.0 0.2
10 LPR: League of polish families 49 0.1 8.1
11 German minority 3 0.0 0.5
13 PUG: Polish economic union 3 0.0 0.5
95 Other list 11 0.0 1.8
98 Don't know M 210 0.5
99 No answer M 2 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 606
page 316
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PT_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44391 96.5
1 Bloco de Esquerda 62 0.1 4.4
2 CDS/PP 18 0.0 1.3
3 CDU-PCP 91 0.2 6.5
5 PPD/PSD 290 0.6 20.6
6 PS 419 0.9 29.8
7 PSR 2 0.0 0.1
8 UDP 1 0.0 0.1
95 Other 4 0.0 0.3
96 None, no preference 518 1.1 36.9
99 NA M 197 0.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1405
page 317
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CL_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44488 96.7
1 Independent National Alliance 35 0.1 2.5
2 Communist Party of Chile 37 0.1 2.6
3 Christian Democratic Party 166 0.4 11.8
4 Humanist Party 29 0.1 2.1
5 Democracy Party PPD 135 0.3 9.6
6 Radical Social Democratic Party 12 0.0 0.9
7 Chilean Socialist Party 122 0.3 8.7
8 National Renewal Party 100 0.2 7.1
9 Independent Democratic Union 141 0.3 10.0
95 Other Party 3 0.0 0.2
96 No party, no preference 625 1.4 44.5
98 Don't know M 47 0.1
99 NA M 53 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1405
page 318
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 319
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PH_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44793 97.4
1 Lakas NUCD-UMDP(Lakas ng tao-National Union of Christian de) 33 0.1 2.8
2 LDP(Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino) 7 0.0 0.6
3 NPC(Nationalists Peoples Coalition) 7 0.0 0.6
5 LP(Liberal Party) 17 0.0 1.4
6 NP(Nacionalista Party) 4 0.0 0.3
8 PDSP(Partido Demokratiko sosyalista ng pilipinas) 1 0.0 0.1
10 PMP(Partido ng Masang Pilipino) 8 0.0 0.7
16 Reforma 3 0.0 0.3
18 Estrada Party 14 0.0 1.2
19 Raul Roco Party 1 0.0 0.1
21 Miriam defensor party 1 0.0 0.1
22 Arroyo Party 9 0.0 0.8
25 OSMENA PARTY 5 0.0 0.4
26 Mayor romanate in tubod Party 1 0.0 0.1
33 Ted Failon Party 1 0.0 0.1
34 Ibanez Party 1 0.0 0.1
35 Promdi 1 0.0 0.1
36 FPJ(Colonia Brigade) 1 0.0 0.1
38 BOPK(Bando Osme Pondok Kaliswagan) 2 0.0 0.2
41 Robert Barbers Party 1 0.0 0.1
42 PPC 3 0.0 0.3
43 Balani 2 0.0 0.2
44 Mayor Parohinog Party 1 0.0 0.1
56 Lammp 1 0.0 0.1
57 Mayor of placer party 1 0.0 0.1
60 Professional Criminilogist Association Phil. 1 0.0 0.1
61 Drilon Party 1 0.0 0.1
62 Danding Party 1 0.0 0.1
63 Cory Party 1 0.0 0.1
64 Enrile Party 1 0.0 0.1
96 None 1069 2.3 89.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1200
page 320
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
RU_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43610 94.8
1 Agrarian Party 11 0.0 1.0
2 Women of Russia 71 0.2 6.2
3 Yabloko 84 0.2 7.3
4 United Russia 305 0.7 26.6
5 LDPR 86 0.2 7.5
6 KPRF 219 0.5 19.1
7 Union of right forces 64 0.1 5.6
95 Other Party 119 0.3 10.4
96 Would not vote;no party preference 186 0.4 16.2
98 Don't know M 1238 2.7
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1145
page 321
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SE_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44807 97.4
1 C (Centre Party) 71 0.2 6.3
2 FP (Liberals) 144 0.3 12.8
3 KD (Christ Democr) 91 0.2 8.1
4 MP (Ecologists) 56 0.1 5.0
5 M (Liberal Conserv) 158 0.3 14.1
6 S (Social Democrats) 431 0.9 38.4
7 V (Socialists) 106 0.2 9.5
95 Other Party 64 0.1 5.7
99 NA M 65 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1121
page 322
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FI_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44614 97.0
1 Social Democratic Party of Finland 245 0.5 24.5
2 Center Party of Finland 174 0.4 17.4
3 National Coalition Party 196 0.4 19.6
4 Left Alliance 53 0.1 5.3
5 Swedish People Party in Finland 46 0.1 4.6
6 Green League 127 0.3 12.7
7 Christian Democrats 49 0.1 4.9
8 True Finns 16 0.0 1.6
9 Reform Group 3 0.0 0.3
95 Other party 9 0.0 0.9
96 Would not vote 80 0.2 8.0
97 Refused M 114 0.2
98 Don't know M 252 0.5
99 No answer M 15 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 998
page 323
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SK_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44841 97.5
1 S. Bernat (KSS) 7 0.0 0.6
2 M. Butora (Civic org.) 66 0.1 5.9
3 I. Gasparovic (HZD) 244 0.5 21.7
4 J. Kalman (Ind.) 5 0.0 0.4
5 J. Kralik (SDL) 9 0.0 0.8
6 J. Kubik (Ind.) 3 0.0 0.3
7 E. Kukan (SDKU) 175 0.4 15.6
8 V. Meciar (HZDS-LS) 183 0.4 16.3
9 F. Miklosko (KDH) 49 0.1 4.4
10 R. Schuster (Former President) 43 0.1 3.8
11 J. Sestak (Ind.) 3 0.0 0.3
96 Abstain, no party preference 338 0.7 30.0
99 NA M 27 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1125
page 324
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SI_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44900 97.6
1 Democratic ret DESUS 35 0.1 4.4
2 Liberal Democrat LDS 319 0.7 40.3
3 Peoples party SLS 64 0.1 8.1
4 Slovenian Nation SNS 26 0.1 3.3
5 Social Democratic SDS 94 0.2 11.9
6 NSI - New Slovenia 55 0.1 6.9
7 Combined list ZLSD 87 0.2 11.0
8 Youth party SMS 36 0.1 4.5
95 Other Party 31 0.1 3.9
96 Would not vote;No party preference 45 0.1 5.7
97 Refused M 202 0.4
98 Don't know M 99 0.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 792
page 325
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
TW_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43977 95.6
1 KuoMinTang 170 0.4 8.5
2 Democratic Progressive Party 38 0.1 1.9
3 People First Party 12 0.0 0.6
95 Other Party 6 0.0 0.3
96 None 1775 3.9 88.7
97 Refused/ Refused to answer which party M 13 0.0
98 Don't know M 2 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2001
page 326
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
US_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44777 97.4
1 Strong democrat 212 0.5 17.5
2 N very strong democrat 203 0.4 16.8
3 Indep,close democrat 108 0.2 8.9
4 Independent 204 0.4 16.8
5 Indep,close republic 115 0.3 9.5
6 N very strong republic 178 0.4 14.7
7 Strong republican 182 0.4 15.0
95 Other party 9 0.0 0.7
99 No answer M 5 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1211
page 327
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
UY_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44885 97.6
1 Red Party 129 0.3 11.8
2 National Party 230 0.5 21.0
3 Wide front Party 454 1.0 41.4
4 Independent Party 6 0.0 0.5
5 Liberal Party 1 0.0 0.1
95 Other Party 2 0.0 0.2
96 No party preference 275 0.6 25.1
99 NA M 11 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1097
page 328
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
VE_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44794 97.4
1 AD (Soc-Democr) 126 0.3 10.7
2 Copei (Cons) 42 0.1 3.6
3 MAS (Center left) 17 0.0 1.4
4 MVR (Left) 350 0.8 29.6
5 Proyecto Venezuela (Liberal) 69 0.2 5.8
6 Primero Justicia (Liberal) 69 0.2 5.8
7 PPT (Center left) 13 0.0 1.1
8 Causa R (Left) 5 0.0 0.4
9 Convergencia (Cons) 8 0.0 0.7
10 Chavista (Left) 18 0.0 1.5
95 Others 8 0.0 0.7
96 None 456 1.0 38.6
98 Don't know M 13 0.0
99 NA M 5 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1181
page 329
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ZA_PRTY
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 45993 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 0.0
Valid Cases 0
page 330
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
0 NAP
1 Yes
2 No
8 Don't know
9 No answer
page 331
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 332
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
0 No religion
100 Roman Catholic
110 Greek Catholic
200 Protestant (evangelische) free church
210 Anglican, Church of England, Episcopal
220 Baptists
230 Congregationalists
240 Mennonite
250 Lutheran, evangelical church
260 Methodist
270 Pentecostal
280 Presbyterian, Church of Scotland
289 Universal Church of God
290 Other Protestants (no spec. rel)
291 Brethren
292 Mormon
293 Salvation Army
294 Assemblies of God
295 Seventh Day Adventists
296 Hussites
297 Unitarians
298 CA: United Church
299 Church of God and Saint of Christ
300 Orthodox; Eastern Orthodox
310 Greek Orthodox
320 Russian Orthodox
390 Orthodox (no spec. mentioned)
400 Other Christian Groups
401 Aglipayan
402 Born Again
405 PH: United Church of Christ
407 Dating Daan
412 Christians
413 Espiritista
414 Iglesia ni Cristo
415 Church of Christ
418 Evangelical Christian
423 Filipinista
424 Iglesia ng Dios
429 Kristohanon
430 Apostle Twelve
431 African Evangelical
page 333
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Australia (AU):
297 Uniting Church
in Chile (CL):
700 Specific Buddhist Groups
page 334
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
1 No religion
2 Roman Catholic
3 Protestant
4 Christian Orthodox
5 Jewish
6 Islam
7 Buddhism
8 Hinduism
9 Other Christian Religions
10 Other Eastern Religions
11 Other Religions
97 Refused
98 Don't know
99 No answer
page 335
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 336
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 337
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
0 NAP: No religion (No Christian religion, religion without religious services, No answer to religious questions)
1 Several times a week
2 Once a week
3 2 or 3 times a month
4 Once a month
5 Several times a year
6 Once a year
7 Less frequently
8 Never
97 Refused
98 Don't know, varies too much
99 No answer
page 338
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 339
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT 1006 974
AU 2183 2109
BG 1069 1051
CA 1211 1056
CH 1037 1031
CL 1505 1482
CZ 1276 1207
DE-E 437 436
DE-W 850 847
DK 1322 1270
ES 1212 1158
FI 1379 1324
FR 1669 1425
GB-GBN 873 738
HU 1021 1012
IE 1065 1027
IL-A 152 152
IL-J 1066 1058
JP 1102 1069
KR 1315 736
LV 1000 961
NL 1823 1761
NO 1469 1446
NZ 1036 982
PH 1200 1199
PL 1277 1270
PT 1602 1458
RU 2383 2383
SE 1186 1142
SI 1093 1069
SK 1152 1038
TW 2016 2016
US 1216 1212
UY 1108 1108
VE 1199 1103
ZA 2483 2244
N Sum 45993
N Valid Sum 43554
page 340
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
1 Lowest
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 Highest
97 Refused
98 Don't know
99 No answer
in GB-GBN ZA:
0 Not available/ Not asked
Derivation:
Canada (CA): The variable was derived from CLASS, with these categories:
1 The lower class
2 The working class
3 Upper working class/ lower middle class
4 Middle class
5 Upper middle class
6 Upper class
page 341
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 342
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 343
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44987 97.8
1 Vorarlberg 40 0.1 4.0
2 Tirol 75 0.2 7.5
3 Salzburg 71 0.2 7.1
4 Oberoesterreich 169 0.4 16.8
5 Kaernten 76 0.2 7.6
6 Steiermark 152 0.3 15.1
7 Burgenland 37 0.1 3.7
8 Niederoesterreich 203 0.4 20.2
9 Wien 183 0.4 18.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1006
page 344
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AU_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43810 95.3
1 New South Wales 739 1.6 34.2
2 Victoria 569 1.2 26.3
3 Queensland 366 0.8 16.9
4 South Australia 189 0.4 8.7
5 Western Australia 186 0.4 8.6
6 Tasmania 62 0.1 2.9
7 Australian Capital Territory 42 0.1 1.9
8 Northern Territory 10 0.0 0.5
99 NA M 20 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2163
page 345
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 346
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
BG_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44924 97.7
1 Blagoevgrad 48 0.1 4.5
2 Bourgas 56 0.1 5.2
3 Varna 61 0.1 5.7
4 Veliko Tarnovo 39 0.1 3.6
5 Vidin 16 0.0 1.5
6 Vratza 30 0.1 2.8
7 Gabrovo 23 0.1 2.2
8 Dobritch 29 0.1 2.7
9 Kardzali 39 0.1 3.6
10 Kustnedil 23 0.1 2.2
11 Lovetch 24 0.1 2.2
12 Montana 24 0.1 2.2
13 Pazardzik 45 0.1 4.2
14 Pernik 16 0.0 1.5
15 Pleven 51 0.1 4.8
16 Plovdiv 92 0.2 8.6
17 Razgrad 24 0.1 2.2
18 Rousse 33 0.1 3.1
19 Silistra 23 0.1 2.2
20 Sliven 32 0.1 3.0
21 Smolian 16 0.0 1.5
22 Sofia city 120 0.3 11.2
23 Sofia region 41 0.1 3.8
24 Stara Zagora 56 0.1 5.2
25 Targovishte 15 0.0 1.4
26 Haskovo 42 0.1 3.9
27 Shoumen 27 0.1 2.5
28 Yambol 24 0.1 2.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1069
page 347
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CA_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44782 97.4
1 Newfoundland 67 0.1 5.6
2 Nova Scotia 58 0.1 4.9
3 Prince Edward Island 88 0.2 7.4
4 New Brunswick 83 0.2 7.0
5 Quebec 311 0.7 26.2
6 Ontario 254 0.6 21.4
7 Manitoba 68 0.1 5.7
8 Saskatchewan 81 0.2 6.8
9 Alberta 77 0.2 6.5
10 British Colombia 102 0.2 8.6
99 NA M 22 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1189
page 348
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 349
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CH_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44956 97.7
1 Zuerich 231 0.5 22.3
2 Bern 187 0.4 18.0
3 Luzern 41 0.1 4.0
8 Glarus 19 0.0 1.8
9 Zug 12 0.0 1.2
10 Fribourg 40 0.1 3.9
11 Solothurn 40 0.1 3.9
12 Baselstadt 7 0.0 0.7
17 St. Gallen 86 0.2 8.3
18 Graubuenden 27 0.1 2.6
19 Aargau 71 0.2 6.8
20 Thurgau 58 0.1 5.6
21 Ticino 42 0.1 4.1
22 Vaud 80 0.2 7.7
23 Wallis 41 0.1 4.0
25 Geneve 31 0.1 3.0
26 Jura 24 0.1 2.3
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1037
page 350
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CZ_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44717 97.2
1 Prague 103 0.2 8.1
2 Central Bohemia 138 0.3 10.8
3 South Bohemia 88 0.2 6.9
4 Pilsen 75 0.2 5.9
5 Carlsbad 29 0.1 2.3
6 Usti n/L 102 0.2 8.0
7 Liberec 47 0.1 3.7
8 Hradec Kralove 42 0.1 3.3
9 Pardubice 80 0.2 6.3
10 Vysocina 107 0.2 8.4
11 South Moravia 131 0.3 10.3
12 Olomouc 83 0.2 6.5
13 Moravia-Silesia 184 0.4 14.4
14 Zlin 67 0.1 5.3
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1276
page 351
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 352
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DE_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44706 97.2
1 Schleswig-Holstein 36 0.1 2.8
2 Hamburg 9 0.0 0.7
3 Niedersachsen 96 0.2 7.5
4 Bremen 5 0.0 0.4
5 Nordrhein-Westfalen 217 0.5 16.9
6 Hessen 104 0.2 8.1
7 Rheinland-Pfalz 59 0.1 4.6
8 Baden-Wuerttemberg 122 0.3 9.5
9 Bayern 168 0.4 13.1
10 Saarland 11 0.0 0.9
11 Berlin-Ost 31 0.1 2.4
12 Mecklbg-Vorpommern 52 0.1 4.0
13 Brandenburg 71 0.2 5.5
14 Sachsen-Anhalt 82 0.2 6.4
15 Thueringen 61 0.1 4.7
16 Sachsen 140 0.3 10.9
17 Berlin-West 23 0.1 1.8
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1287
page 353
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DK_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44671 97.1
1 Copenhagen county 140 0.3 10.7
2 Frederiksborg county 103 0.2 7.9
3 Roskilde county 61 0.1 4.7
4 Westernzealand county 72 0.2 5.5
5 Storstroems county 65 0.1 5.0
7 Funen county 123 0.3 9.4
8 Southern Jutland county 66 0.1 5.0
9 Ribe county 54 0.1 4.1
10 Vejle county 99 0.2 7.6
11 Ringkoebing county 60 0.1 4.6
12 Aarhus county 171 0.4 13.0
13 Viborg county 69 0.2 5.3
14 Nothern Jutland county 116 0.3 8.8
15 Copenhagen municipality 88 0.2 6.7
16 Frederiksberg municipality 24 0.1 1.8
99 NA M 11 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1311
page 354
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 355
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ES_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44781 97.4
1 Andalucia 210 0.5 17.3
2 Aragon 38 0.1 3.1
3 Asturias 34 0.1 2.8
4 Baleares 24 0.1 2.0
5 Catalu 191 0.4 15.8
6 Canarias 49 0.1 4.0
7 Cantabria 17 0.0 1.4
8 Castilla-Leon 78 0.2 6.4
9 Castilla-La Mancha 52 0.1 4.3
10 Extremadura 31 0.1 2.6
11 Galicia 87 0.2 7.2
12 La Rioja 7 0.0 0.6
13 Madrid 152 0.3 12.5
14 Murcia 33 0.1 2.7
15 Navarra 17 0.0 1.4
16 Pais Vasco 68 0.1 5.6
17 Comunidad Valenciana 124 0.3 10.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1212
page 356
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 357
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
42 Loire
43 Haute-Loire
44 Loire-Atlantique
45 Loiret
46 Lot
47 Lot-et-Garonne
48 Lozere
49 Maine-et-Loire
50 Manche
51 Marne
52 Haute-Marne
53 Mayenne
54 Meurthe-et-Moselle
55 Meuse
56 Morbihan
57 Moselle
58 Nievre
59 Nord
60 Oise
61 Orne
62 Pas-de-Calais
63 Puy-de-Dome
64 Pyrenees-Atlantiques
65 Hautes-Pyrenees
66 Pyrenees-Orientales
67 Bas-Rhin
68 Haut-Rhin
69 Rhone
70 Haute-Saone
71 Saone-et-Loire
72 Sarthe
73 Savoie
74 Haute-Savoie
75 Ville de Paris
76 Seine-Maritime
77 Seine-et-Marne
78 Yvelines
79 Deux-Sevres
80 Somme
81 Tarn
82 Tarn-et-Garonne
83 Var
84 Vaucluse
85 Vendee
86 Vienne
87 Haute-Vienne
88 Vosges
page 358
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
89 Yonne
90 Belfort (Territoire)
91 Essone
92 Hauts-de-Seine
93 Seine-Saint-Denis
94 Val-de-Marne
95 Val-d Oise
96 Corse-Sud
99 No answer
page 359
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FR_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44324 96.4
1 Ain 14 0.0 0.8
2 Aisne 9 0.0 0.5
3 Allier 11 0.0 0.7
4 Alpes-Hte-Provence 8 0.0 0.5
5 Hautes-Alpes 3 0.0 0.2
6 Alpes-Maritimes 27 0.1 1.6
7 Ardeche 10 0.0 0.6
8 Ardennes 5 0.0 0.3
9 Ariege 12 0.0 0.7
10 Aube 9 0.0 0.5
11 Aude 10 0.0 0.6
12 Aveyron 9 0.0 0.5
13 Bouche-du-Rhone 55 0.1 3.3
14 Calvados 17 0.0 1.0
15 Cantal 6 0.0 0.4
16 Charente 4 0.0 0.2
17 Charente-Maritime 23 0.1 1.4
18 Cher 4 0.0 0.2
19 Correze 8 0.0 0.5
20 Haute-Corse 3 0.0 0.2
21 Cote-d Or 12 0.0 0.7
22 Cotes-d Armor 19 0.0 1.1
23 Creuse 9 0.0 0.5
24 Dordogne 12 0.0 0.7
25 Doubs 19 0.0 1.1
26 Drome 11 0.0 0.7
27 Eure 12 0.0 0.7
28 Eure-et-Loir 8 0.0 0.5
29 Finistere 29 0.1 1.8
30 Gard 22 0.0 1.3
31 Haute-Garonne 38 0.1 2.3
32 Gers 5 0.0 0.3
33 Gironde 59 0.1 3.6
34 Herault 29 0.1 1.8
35 Ille-et-Vilaine 26 0.1 1.6
36 Indre 4 0.0 0.2
37 Indre-et-Loire 17 0.0 1.0
38 Isere 35 0.1 2.1
39 Jura 7 0.0 0.4
40 Landes 8 0.0 0.5
41 Loir-et-Cher 7 0.0 0.4
42 Loire 16 0.0 1.0
43 Haute-Loire 10 0.0 0.6
44 Loire-Atlantique 40 0.1 2.4
45 Loiret 10 0.0 0.6
46 Lot 4 0.0 0.2
47 Lot-et-Garonne 11 0.0 0.7
48 Lozere 4 0.0 0.2
49 Maine-et-Loire 30 0.1 1.8
50 Manche 16 0.0 1.0
page 360
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 361
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
GB_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 45120 98.1
1 Scotland 100 0.2 11.5
2 North,North West,Yorkshire Hbs 211 0.5 24.2
3 West, East Midlands 159 0.3 18.2
4 Wales 54 0.1 6.2
5 East Anglia,South West,S-E 274 0.6 31.4
6 London 75 0.2 8.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 873
page 362
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 363
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
HU_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44972 97.8
1 Budapest 179 0.4 17.5
2 Baranya 59 0.1 5.8
3 Bacs-Kiskun 48 0.1 4.7
4 Bekes 12 0.0 1.2
5 Borsod-Abauj 72 0.2 7.1
6 Csongrad 83 0.2 8.1
7 Fejer 46 0.1 4.5
8 Gyor-Sopron 60 0.1 5.9
9 Hajdu-Bihar 36 0.1 3.5
10 Heves 35 0.1 3.4
11 Komarom 12 0.0 1.2
12 Nograd 12 0.0 1.2
13 Pest 116 0.3 11.4
14 Somogy 36 0.1 3.5
15 Szabolcs-Szatmar 48 0.1 4.7
16 Szolnok 72 0.2 7.1
18 Vas 12 0.0 1.2
19 Veszprem 48 0.1 4.7
20 Zala 35 0.1 3.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1021
page 364
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
IL_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44775 97.4
1 North 261 0.6 21.6
2 South 174 0.4 14.4
3 Tel-Aviv 452 1.0 37.4
4 Jerusalem 169 0.4 14.0
5 Arab sector 152 0.3 12.6
99 NA M 10 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1208
page 365
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
IE_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44928 97.7
1 Border 147 0.3 13.8
2 Dublin 239 0.5 22.4
3 Mid-East 131 0.3 12.3
4 Midland 51 0.1 4.8
5 Mid-West 121 0.3 11.4
6 South-East 81 0.2 7.6
7 South-West 187 0.4 17.6
8 West 108 0.2 10.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1065
page 366
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
JP_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44891 97.6
1 Hokkaido, Tohoku 132 0.3 12.0
2 Kanto, Koshin-etsu 377 0.8 34.2
3 Chubu 177 0.4 16.1
4 Kinki 171 0.4 15.5
5 Chugoku, Shikoku 117 0.3 10.6
6 Kyushu 128 0.3 11.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1102
page 367
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
KR_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44678 97.1
1 Seoul Metropolitan City 291 0.6 22.1
2 Incheon Metropolitan city 74 0.2 5.6
3 Daejeon Metropolitan city 34 0.1 2.6
4 Busan Metropolitan city 107 0.2 8.1
5 Ulsan Metropolitan City 24 0.1 1.8
6 Deagu Metropolitan City 65 0.1 4.9
7 Gwangju Metropolitan city 43 0.1 3.3
8 Gyeonggi Province 249 0.5 18.9
9 Gangwon Province 44 0.1 3.3
10 Chungcheong Province 112 0.2 8.5
11 Gyeongsang Province 145 0.3 11.0
12 Jeolla Province 112 0.2 8.5
13 Jeju-do 15 0.0 1.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1315
page 368
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
LV_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44993 97.8
1 Riga 331 0.7 33.1
2 Vidzeme 207 0.5 20.7
3 Kurzeme 132 0.3 13.2
4 Zemgale 169 0.4 16.9
5 Latgale 161 0.4 16.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1000
page 369
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NL_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44170 96.0
1 Groningen 65 0.1 3.6
2 Friesland 75 0.2 4.1
3 Drente 71 0.2 3.9
4 Overijssel 124 0.3 6.9
5 Gelderland 215 0.5 11.9
6 Utrecht 141 0.3 7.8
7 Noord-Holland 291 0.6 16.1
8 Zuid-Holland 368 0.8 20.3
9 Zeeland 41 0.1 2.3
10 Noord-Brabant 263 0.6 14.5
11 Limburg 123 0.3 6.8
12 Flevoland 33 0.1 1.8
99 NA M 13 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1810
page 370
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NO_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44524 96.8
1 Central East 317 0.7 21.6
2 East 420 0.9 28.6
3 South 78 0.2 5.3
4 West 382 0.8 26.0
5 Middle 139 0.3 9.5
6 North 133 0.3 9.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1469
page 371
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 372
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NZ_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44957 97.7
1 Northland 43 0.1 4.2
2 Auckland 265 0.6 25.9
3 Thames Valley 11 0.0 1.1
4 Bay of Plenty 89 0.2 8.7
5 Waikato 72 0.2 7.0
6 Tongariro 3 0.0 0.3
7 East Cape 14 0.0 1.4
8 Hawkes Bay 50 0.1 4.9
9 Taranaki 33 0.1 3.2
10 Wanganui 16 0.0 1.6
11 Manawatu 39 0.1 3.8
12 Horowhenua 16 0.0 1.6
13 Wellington 99 0.2 9.7
14 Wairarapa 11 0.0 1.1
15 Nelson Bays 26 0.1 2.5
16 Marlborough 15 0.0 1.5
17 West Coast 9 0.0 0.9
18 Canterbury 115 0.3 11.2
19 Aorangi 12 0.0 1.2
20 Clutha-Centr Otago 22 0.0 2.1
21 Coastal-North Otago 28 0.1 2.7
22 Southland 36 0.1 3.5
99 NA M 12 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1024
page 373
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PL_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44716 97.2
1 Dolnoslaskie 98 0.2 7.7
2 Kujawsko-Pomorskie 64 0.1 5.0
3 Lubelskie 70 0.2 5.5
4 Lubuskie 38 0.1 3.0
5 Lodzkie 93 0.2 7.3
6 Maloposlkie 103 0.2 8.1
7 Mazowieckie 170 0.4 13.3
8 Opolskie 41 0.1 3.2
9 Podkarpackie 65 0.1 5.1
10 Podlaskie 38 0.1 3.0
11 Pomorskie 56 0.1 4.4
12 Slaskie 179 0.4 14.0
13 Swietokrzyskie 47 0.1 3.7
14 Warminsko-Mazurskie 47 0.1 3.7
15 Wielkopolskie 115 0.3 9.0
16 Zachodniopomorskie 53 0.1 4.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1277
page 374
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PT_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44391 96.5
1 North 422 0.9 26.3
2 Centre 222 0.5 13.9
3 Lisbon a Tagus Val 808 1.8 50.4
4 Alentejo 99 0.2 6.2
5 Algarve 51 0.1 3.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1602
page 375
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CL_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44488 96.7
1 Tarapaca 40 0.1 2.7
2 Antofagasta 50 0.1 3.3
3 Atacama 25 0.1 1.7
4 Coquimbo 60 0.1 4.0
5 Valparaiso 155 0.3 10.3
6 Libertador General 75 0.2 5.0
7 Maule 90 0.2 6.0
8 Biobio 185 0.4 12.3
9 La Araucania 85 0.2 5.6
10 Los Lagos 105 0.2 7.0
11 Aisen del General 10 0.0 0.7
12 Magallanes y Antari 15 0.0 1.0
13 Metropolitana de Santiago 610 1.3 40.5
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1505
page 376
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PH_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44793 97.4
1 National Capital Region (NCR) 300 0.7 25.0
2 Balance Luzon 300 0.7 25.0
3 Visayas 300 0.7 25.0
4 Mindanao 300 0.7 25.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1200
page 377
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
RU_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43610 94.8
1 North 139 0.3 5.8
2 North-West 82 0.2 3.4
3 Central 714 1.6 30.0
4 Volga-Vyatka 119 0.3 5.0
5 Black Earth 110 0.2 4.6
6 Volga Region 236 0.5 9.9
7 North Caucasus 237 0.5 9.9
8 Urals 289 0.6 12.1
9 West Siberia 212 0.5 8.9
10 East Siberia 131 0.3 5.5
11 Far East 114 0.2 4.8
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2383
page 378
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SE_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44807 97.4
1 North 144 0.3 12.2
2 Mid North 126 0.3 10.7
3 Mid East 188 0.4 15.9
4 Stockholm 214 0.5 18.1
5 West 111 0.2 9.4
6 Goeteborg 124 0.3 10.5
7 Smaaland Gotland 102 0.2 8.6
8 South 103 0.2 8.7
9 Malmoe 70 0.2 5.9
99 NA M 4 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1182
page 379
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 380
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FI_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44614 97.0
1 Uusimaa 363 0.8 26.5
2 Varsinais-Suomi 111 0.2 8.1
4 Satakunta 54 0.1 3.9
5 Kanta-Haeme 45 0.1 3.3
6 Pirkanmaa 123 0.3 9.0
7 Paeijaet-Haeme 56 0.1 4.1
8 Kymenlaakso 46 0.1 3.4
9 South Karelia 42 0.1 3.1
10 Etelae-Savo 44 0.1 3.2
11 Pohjois-Savo 61 0.1 4.4
12 North Karelia 46 0.1 3.4
13 Central Finland 77 0.2 5.6
14 South Ostrobothnia 42 0.1 3.1
15 Ostrobothnia 45 0.1 3.3
16 Central Ostrobothnia 17 0.0 1.2
17 North Ostrobothnia 93 0.2 6.8
18 Kainuu 27 0.1 2.0
19 Lapland 47 0.1 3.4
20 Itae-Uusimaa 25 0.1 1.8
21 Aland 7 0.0 0.5
99 Not known M 8 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1371
page 381
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SK_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44841 97.5
1 Bratislava county 131 0.3 11.4
2 Trnava county 117 0.3 10.2
3 Trencin county 128 0.3 11.1
4 Nitra county 153 0.3 13.3
5 Zilina county 148 0.3 12.9
6 Ban. Bystrica county 141 0.3 12.3
7 Presov county 169 0.4 14.7
8 Kosice county 164 0.4 14.2
99 NA M 1 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1151
page 382
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SI_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44900 97.6
1 Pomurska 80 0.2 7.3
2 Podravska 181 0.4 16.6
3 Koroska 51 0.1 4.7
4 Savinjska 158 0.3 14.5
5 Gorenjska 122 0.3 11.2
6 Zasavska 20 0.0 1.8
7 Osrednja 244 0.5 22.3
8 Spodnjeposavska 37 0.1 3.4
9 Dolenjska 62 0.1 5.7
10 Goriska 65 0.1 5.9
11 Obalnokraska 49 0.1 4.5
12 Kraska 24 0.1 2.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1093
page 383
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
TW_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43977 95.6
1 North 969 2.1 48.1
2 Central 323 0.7 16.0
3 South 624 1.4 31.0
4 East 100 0.2 5.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2016
page 384
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
US_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44777 97.4
1 New England 33 0.1 2.7
2 Middle Atlantic 152 0.3 12.5
3 East North Central 234 0.5 19.2
4 West North Central 90 0.2 7.4
5 South Atlantic 259 0.6 21.3
6 East South Central 67 0.1 5.5
7 West South Central 110 0.2 9.0
8 Mountain 94 0.2 7.7
9 Pacific 177 0.4 14.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1216
page 385
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
UY_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44885 97.6
1 Metropolitan statistical area of Montevideo 680 1.5 61.4
2 Rest of urban population 428 0.9 38.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1108
page 386
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
VE_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 45993 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 0.0
Valid Cases 0
page 387
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ZA_REG
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43510 94.6
1 WC: Western Cape 270 0.6 10.9
2 EC: Eastern Cape 286 0.6 11.5
3 NC: Northern Cape 243 0.5 9.8
4 FS: Free State 210 0.5 8.5
5 KZN: Kwa-Zulu Natal 399 0.9 16.1
6 NW: North West 203 0.4 8.2
7 GT: Gauteng 301 0.7 12.1
8 MP: Mpumalanga 276 0.6 11.1
9 LP: Limpopo 295 0.6 11.9
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2483
page 388
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44987 97.8
1 Vienna 183 0.4 18.2
2 Town with 50 000+ 142 0.3 14.1
3 Smaller Town 256 0.6 25.4
8 Village or rural region 425 0.9 42.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1006
page 389
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AU_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43810 95.3
1 Inner metropolitan (over 100,000 people) 600 1.3 27.9
2 Outer metropolitan (over 100,000 people) 770 1.7 35.8
3 A large town (over 25,000 people) 269 0.6 12.5
4 A larger country town (over 10,000 people) 125 0.3 5.8
5 A small country town (under 10,000 people) 249 0.5 11.6
6 A rural area or on a farm 140 0.3 6.5
99 NA M 30 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2153
page 390
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CA_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44782 97.4
1 Greater than 1 million 101 0.2 8.7
2 750 000 - 999 999 91 0.2 7.8
3 500 000 - 749 999 75 0.2 6.4
4 250 000 - 499 999 94 0.2 8.1
5 100 000 - 249 999 170 0.4 14.6
6 50 000 - 99 999 143 0.3 12.3
7 10 000 - 49 999 298 0.6 25.6
8 1 000 - 9 999 150 0.3 12.9
9 Less than 1 000 43 0.1 3.7
99 NA M 46 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1165
page 391
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Note:
Not documented, probably number of total population of Switzerland
CH_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44956 97.7
7367900 Switzerland 1037 2.3 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1037
page 392
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CL_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 45993 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 0.0
Valid Cases 0
page 393
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
CZ_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44717 97.2
1 1,2 Mill. (Prague) 103 0.2 8.1
2 100 000+ 155 0.3 12.1
3 50 000-99 999 169 0.4 13.2
4 10 000-49 999 221 0.5 17.3
5 5 000-9 999 222 0.5 17.4
6 2 000-4 999 124 0.3 9.7
7 1 000-1 999 123 0.3 9.6
8 Less than 1 000 159 0.3 12.5
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1276
page 394
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DE_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 44723 97.2
1 500 000 and more 156 0.3 12.3
2 100 000-499 999 201 0.4 15.8
3 50 000-99 999 94 0.2 7.4
4 20 000-49 999 184 0.4 14.5
5 5 000-19 999 314 0.7 24.7
6 2 000-4 999 175 0.4 13.8
7 Up to 1 999 146 0.3 11.5
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1270
page 395
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
DK_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44671 97.1
1 Greater Copenhagen area 227 0.5 18.7
2 50 000 to 500 000 201 0.4 16.6
3 10 000-50 000 297 0.6 24.5
4 5 000-10 000 141 0.3 11.6
5 Less than 5 000 345 0.8 28.5
8 Don't know M 85 0.2
9 NA M 26 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1211
page 396
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ES_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44781 97.4
1 Madrid and Barcelona 143 0.3 11.8
2 More than 250.000 179 0.4 14.8
3 100.001-250.000 165 0.4 13.6
4 50.001-100.000 129 0.3 10.6
5 10.001-50.000 285 0.6 23.5
6 5.001-10.000 132 0.3 10.9
7 2.001-5.000 95 0.2 7.8
8 Less than than 2.000 84 0.2 6.9
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1212
page 397
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FR_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44324 96.4
1 Paris 133 0.3 8.3
2 More than 500 000 86 0.2 5.4
3 100 001-500 000 180 0.4 11.2
4 50 001-100 000 115 0.3 7.2
5 20 001-50 000 182 0.4 11.4
6 10 001-20 000 127 0.3 7.9
7 2 001-10 000 389 0.8 24.3
8 Less than 2 000 390 0.8 24.3
99 NA M 67 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1602
page 398
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
GB_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 45120 98.1
1 Highest population density 185 0.4 21.2
2 225 0.5 25.8
3 218 0.5 25.0
4 Lowest population density 245 0.5 28.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 873
page 399
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
HU_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44972 97.8
1 2 mill.inh.,Budapest 179 0.4 17.5
2 100 000+ 72 0.2 7.1
3 50 001-100 000 60 0.1 5.9
4 20 001-50 000 119 0.3 11.7
5 10 001-20 000 108 0.2 10.6
6 5 001-10 000 96 0.2 9.4
7 2 001-5 000 140 0.3 13.7
8 1 001-2 000 128 0.3 12.5
9 Less than 1 000 119 0.3 11.7
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1021
page 400
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
IL_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44775 97.4
1 More than 100 000 586 1.3 49.2
2 50 001-100 000 115 0.3 9.7
3 20 001-50 000 301 0.7 25.3
4 10 001-20 000 115 0.3 9.7
5 5 001-10 000 30 0.1 2.5
6 2 501- 5 000 44 0.1 3.7
9 NA M 27 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1191
page 401
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
IE_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44928 97.7
1 Dublin 218 0.5 20.9
2 large city 70000 to 100000 85 0.2 8.2
3 medium city 50000 to 69999 11 0.0 1.1
4 large town 10000 to 49999 107 0.2 10.3
5 small town 3000 to 9999 92 0.2 8.8
6 Village up to 3000 159 0.3 15.3
7 Farm, rural property 370 0.8 35.5
99 No answer M 23 0.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1042
page 402
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
JP_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44891 97.6
1 1.000.000 or more 198 0.4 18.0
2 300.000-999.999 168 0.4 15.2
3 100.000-299.999 237 0.5 21.5
4 less than 100.000 200 0.4 18.1
5 Town or village 299 0.7 27.1
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1102
page 403
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
KR_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44678 97.1
1 1 000 001 and more; metropolitan 638 1.4 48.5
2 100 001-1 000 000; large city 510 1.1 38.8
3 50 001-100 000; middle city 129 0.3 9.8
4 Less than 50 000; rural county 38 0.1 2.9
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1315
page 404
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
LV_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44993 97.8
1 More than 500.000 331 0.7 33.1
2 100.001-500.000 49 0.1 4.9
3 50.001-100.000 89 0.2 8.9
4 20.001-50.000 71 0.2 7.1
5 10.001-20.000 76 0.2 7.6
6 5.001-10.000 64 0.1 6.4
7 2.000-5.000 168 0.4 16.8
8 Less than 2.000 152 0.3 15.2
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1000
page 405
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NL_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44170 96.0
1 More than 400 000 160 0.3 8.8
2 100 000-400 000 274 0.6 15.1
3 50 000-99 999 312 0.7 17.2
4 20 000-49 999 472 1.0 26.1
5 10 000-19 999 397 0.9 21.9
6 5 000-9 999 173 0.4 9.6
7 Less than 5 000 22 0.0 1.2
99 NA M 13 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1810
page 406
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NO_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44524 96.8
1 More than 100 000 367 0.8 25.0
2 30 000-99 999 283 0.6 19.3
3 3 000-29 999 727 1.6 49.5
4 Less than 3 000 92 0.2 6.3
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1469
page 407
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
BG_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44924 97.7
1 Sofia (1.2Mill) 120 0.3 11.2
2 100001-500000 183 0.4 17.1
3 20001+100000 223 0.5 20.9
4 2001-20000 293 0.6 27.4
5 Up to 2000 250 0.5 23.4
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1069
page 408
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
NZ_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 45993 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 0.0
Valid Cases 0
page 409
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PL_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44716 97.2
1 More than 500 000 26 0.1 2.0
2 250 000-500 000 84 0.2 6.6
3 100 000-249 999 253 0.6 19.8
4 50 000- 99 999 150 0.3 11.7
5 25 000- 49 999 104 0.2 8.1
6 10 000- 24 999 92 0.2 7.2
7 Less than 10 000 108 0.2 8.5
8 Village 460 1.0 36.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1277
page 410
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PT_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44391 96.5
1 Greater than 100 000 206 0.4 12.9
2 20 000-100 000 279 0.6 17.4
3 5 000-19 999 368 0.8 23.0
4 1 000-4 999 396 0.9 24.7
5 Less than 1 000 353 0.8 22.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1602
page 411
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Note:
Not documented, codes probably relate to sampling points
page 412
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
PH_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 44860 97.5
192 192 5 0.0 0.4
209 5 0.0 0.4
234 5 0.0 0.4
308 5 0.0 0.4
357 5 0.0 0.4
368 5 0.0 0.4
381 5 0.0 0.4
403 5 0.0 0.4
408 5 0.0 0.4
423 5 0.0 0.4
457 5 0.0 0.4
506 5 0.0 0.4
516 5 0.0 0.4
521 5 0.0 0.4
537 5 0.0 0.4
566 5 0.0 0.4
567 5 0.0 0.4
595 5 0.0 0.4
598 5 0.0 0.4
626 5 0.0 0.4
633 5 0.0 0.4
636 5 0.0 0.4
640 5 0.0 0.4
656 5 0.0 0.4
711 5 0.0 0.4
714 5 0.0 0.4
715 5 0.0 0.4
740 5 0.0 0.4
741 5 0.0 0.4
743 5 0.0 0.4
747 7 0.0 0.6
808 5 0.0 0.4
810 5 0.0 0.4
834 5 0.0 0.4
839 5 0.0 0.4
860 5 0.0 0.4
863 5 0.0 0.4
899 5 0.0 0.4
931 5 0.0 0.4
958 5 0.0 0.4
963 5 0.0 0.4
965 5 0.0 0.4
969 5 0.0 0.4
980 5 0.0 0.4
981 5 0.0 0.4
1060 10 0.0 0.9
1066 5 0.0 0.4
1067 5 0.0 0.4
1089 5 0.0 0.4
1097 5 0.0 0.4
page 413
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 414
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 415
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 416
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 417
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
RU_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43610 94.8
1 More than 1 million 672 1.5 28.2
2 500 001-1 000 000 209 0.5 8.8
3 250 001-500 000 229 0.5 9.6
4 100 001-250 000 199 0.4 8.4
5 50 001-100 000 205 0.4 8.6
6 20 001-50 000 169 0.4 7.1
7 Urban, less than 20 000 152 0.3 6.4
8 Rural 548 1.2 23.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2383
page 418
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SE_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44807 97.4
1 More than 300 000 408 0.9 34.5
2 90 000 - 300 000 415 0.9 35.1
3 27 000 - 90 000 293 0.6 24.8
4 Less than 27 000 66 0.1 5.6
99 NA M 4 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1182
page 419
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Note:
No. of inhabitants in region
page 420
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
FI_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44614 97.0
26257 Inhabitants (Aland region) 7 0.0 0.5
70674 Inhabitants (Central Ostrobothnia region) 17 0.0 1.2
87371 Inhabitants (Kainuu region) 27 0.1 2.0
90934 Inhabitants (Itae-Uusimaa region) 25 0.1 1.8
136694 Inhabitants (South Karelia region) 42 0.1 3.1
163276 Inhabitants (Etelae-Savo region) 44 0.1 3.2
165886 Inhabitants (Kanta-Haeme region) 45 0.1 3.3
169722 Inhabitants (North Karelia region) 46 0.1 3.4
173006 Inhabitants (Ostrobothnia) 45 0.1 3.3
186111 Inhabitants (Kymenlaakso region) 46 0.1 3.4
187777 Inhabitants (Lapland region) 47 0.1 3.4
194105 Inhabitants (South Ostrobothnia region) 42 0.1 3.1
198088 Inhabitants (Paeijaet-Haeme region) 56 0.1 4.1
235416 Inhabitants (Satakunta region) 54 0.1 3.9
251976 Inhabitants (Pohjois-Savo region) 61 0.1 4.4
265078 Inhabitants (Central Finland region) 77 0.2 5.6
369974 Inhabitants (North Ostrobothnia region) 93 0.2 6.8
450968 Inhabitants (Varsinais-Suomi region) 111 0.2 8.1
453978 Inhabitants (Pirkanmaa region) 123 0.3 9.0
1329004 Inhabitants (Uusimaa region) 363 0.8 26.5
9999999 Not known M 8 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1371
page 421
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SK_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44841 97.5
1 More than 100 000 144 0.3 12.5
2 50 000 -100 000 163 0.4 14.1
3 10 000 - 50 000 315 0.7 27.3
4 2 000 - 10 000 207 0.5 18.0
5 Up to 2 000 323 0.7 28.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1152
page 422
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
SI_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44900 97.6
1 More than 50 000 (Lblj,Mar) 168 0.4 15.5
2 10 000-50 000 146 0.3 13.5
3 4 000-10 000 65 0.1 6.0
4 2 000-4 000 74 0.2 6.8
5 500-2 000 285 0.6 26.3
6 Less than 500 347 0.8 32.0
99 NA M 8 0.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1085
page 423
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Note:
Not enough documented
TW_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43977 95.6
1 More than 9000 21 0.0 1.0
2 8000-8999 25 0.1 1.2
3 7000-7999 116 0.3 5.8
4 6000-6999 143 0.3 7.1
5 5000-5999 160 0.3 7.9
6 4000-4999 290 0.6 14.4
7 3000-3999 390 0.8 19.3
8 2000-2999 328 0.7 16.3
9 1000-1999 436 0.9 21.6
10 Less than 999 107 0.2 5.3
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2016
page 424
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
US_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44777 97.4
1 1-9 millions 75 0.2 6.2
2 500 000-999 999 48 0.1 3.9
3 100 000-499 999 164 0.4 13.5
4 50 000-99 999 137 0.3 11.3
5 10 000-49 999 408 0.9 33.6
6 1 000-9 999 360 0.8 29.6
7 Up to 999 24 0.1 2.0
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1216
page 425
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
UY_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 44885 97.6
1 1.597.943 urban population 680 1.5 61.4
2 992.552 urban population 428 0.9 38.6
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 1108
page 426
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
VE_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAV, NAP M 45993 100.0
Sum 45993 100.0 0.0
Valid Cases 0
page 427
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ZA_SIZE
Value Label Missing Count Percent Valid Percent
0 NAP, other countries M 43510 94.6
1 Tribal 490 1.1 19.7
2 Farms 287 0.6 11.6
3 Smallholdings 15 0.0 0.6
4 Urban formal 1377 3.0 55.5
5 Urban informal 296 0.6 11.9
9 Hostels 18 0.0 0.7
Sum 45993 100.0 100.0
Valid Cases 2483
page 428
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Chile (CL):
1 Total urban
5 Total rural
in Venezuela (VE):
0 Not available/ Not asked
in AU CA ES FR HU IL PL PT RU SI US UY:
1 Urban
3 Suburb, city or town
4 Rural
page 429
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 430
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 431
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
42 Ethiopia
43 European, White/European, Europe
44 Europeans Mediterranean
45 Finnish, Finland
46 French, France
47 Gallego
48 Georgian
49 German, Germany (CZ:Nemec)
50 German + Danish
51 Greek, Greece
52 Hebrew/Ivrit
53 Hungarian, Hungary (CZ:Magyar)
54 Ibanag
55 Ifugao
56 Igorot
57 Ilocano
58 Ilonggo
59 French + English
60 Indian, NL: Ind. + Neth., Hindi, Urdu, Gujarati, Tamil
61 Indonesian, Molukker, Malaysian
62 Inuit, Eskimo
63 Iranian, Persian/Farsi, Dari
64 Iraq, Arab
65 Irish/Irish Gaelic, Ireland
66 Isindebele
67 Isixhosa
68 Isizulu
69 Italian, Italy
70 Itawis
71 Itneg
72 Japanese, Japan
73 Jordan
74 Kapampangan
75 Karay-a
76 Korean
77 Kurdish, Assyrian, Lebanon, Syria
78 Latin-South-America, Columbia, NL Antilles
79 Latvian, Estonian, Lith.,Baltic
80 Lithuanian
81 Luxemborger, Luxemburg
82 Philippine other (Maguindanao, Kuyonin, Tangadanon, Zambaleõ)
83 Maori,NZ Maori
84 Maranaw/Maranao
85 Masbateõ
86 Metis
87 Montenegro
88 Moravian
page 432
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 433
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
137 Xitsonga
138 Zamboangeõ
980 Other African language
981 Other, East European
982 Other, Middle East
983 Other, Mixed origin
984 Other, Western European
985 Other answers
990 No ethnic group
999 No answer/ don't know
in AT AU CH CL DK ES FR GB-GBN IL JP HU NO NZ PL PT TW UY VE:
0 Not available/ Not asked
page 434
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 435
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ETHNIC 24 27 30 31 32 33 34 39 43 45 46
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG 921 (86.6)
CA 4 (0.3) 6 (0.5) 416 (35.2) 396 (33.5)
CH
CL
CZ 1069 (87.0)
DE-E
DE-W 2 (0.2)
DK
ES
FI 1379 (100.0)
FR
GB-GBN
HU
IE 21 (2.0) 2 (0.2)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV
NL 12 (0.7) 2 (0.1) 5 (0.3)
NO
NZ
PH 1 (0.1)
PL
PT
RU
SE
SI 30 (2.8)
SK
TW
US 12 (1.0)
UY
VE
ZA 407 (16.4)
N Sum 921 407 13 4 30 1069 18 439 5 1379 400
N Valid Sum 921 407 13 4 30 1069 18 439 5 1379 400
page 436
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ETHNIC 48 49 52 53 54 57 58 60 61 62 64 65
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA 116 (9.8) 2 (0.2) 17 (1.4)
CH
CL
CZ 10 (0.8) 1 (0.1)
DE-E 430 (98.4)
DE-W 776 (91.5)
DK
ES
FI
FR
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1025 (96.8)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 9 (0.9)
NL 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 5 (0.3) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
NO
NZ
PH 10 (0.8) 156 (13.0) 195 (16.3)
PL
PT
RU
SE
SI 2 (0.2)
SK 103 (8.9)
TW
US 8 (0.7)
UY
VE
ZA 231 (9.3)
N Sum 1 1334 9 107 10 156 195 246 2 17 1 1025
N Valid Sum 1 1334 9 107 10 156 195 246 2 17 1 1025
page 437
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ETHNIC 69 72 74 76 77 78 79 80 82 84 85 86 88
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG
CA 3 (0.3) 6 (0.5)
CH
CL
CZ 111 (9.0)
DE-E
DE-W 3 (0.4)
DK
ES
FI
FR
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1 (0.1)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR 1315 (100.0)
LV 587 (58.7) 13 (1.3)
NL 3 (0.2) 3 (0.2)
NO
NZ
PH 18 (1.5) 81 (6.8) 1 (0.1) 13 (1.1)
PL
PT
RU
SE
SI 3 (0.3)
SK
TW
US 3 (0.2) 33 (2.7)
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 7 3 18 1315 3 39 587 13 81 1 13 6 111
N Valid Sum 7 3 18 1315 3 39 587 13 81 1 13 6 111
page 438
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
AT
AU
BG 52 (4.9)
CA 65 (5.5)
CH
CL
CZ 4 (0.3) 7 (0.6)
DE-E 3 (0.7) 1 (0.2) 3 (0.7)
DE-W 1 (0.1) 25 (2.9) 3 (0.4) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
DK
ES
FI
FR
GB-GBN
HU
IE 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV 19 (1.9) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 315 (31.5)
NL 1711 (95.2) 2 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1)
NO
NZ
PH 10 (0.8) 288 (24.0)
PL
PT
RU 2383 (100.0)
SE 167 (14.1)
SI
SK
TW
US 2 (0.2) 7 (0.6)
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 1712 2 167 2 28 10 296 28 61 4 2703 65
N Valid Sum 1712 2 167 2 28 10 296 28 61 4 2703 65
page 439
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ETHNIC 113 116 118 119 120 121 124 125 126 127 131 132 133
C_ALPHAN
AT
AU
BG 78 (7.3)
CA
CH
CL
CZ 9 (0.7) 16 (1.3) 1 (0.1)
DE-E
DE-W 8 (0.9) 3 (0.4) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 18 (2.1)
DK
ES
FI
FR
GB-GBN
HU
IE 2 (0.2)
IL-A
IL-J
JP
KR
LV 1 (0.1) 19 (1.9)
NL 1 (0.1) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1) 3 (0.2) 14 (0.8)
NO
NZ
PH 313 (26.1)
PL
PT
RU
SE 1017 (85.9)
SI 25 (2.3) 1000 (92.1)
SK 1032 (89.6)
TW
US
UY
VE
ZA
N Sum 34 9 1048 1000 1 7 1018 1 1 5 110 19 313
N Valid Sum 34 9 1048 1000 1 7 1018 1 1 5 110 19 313
page 440
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
ETHNIC 134 136 981 982 983 984 985 990 999 N Sum N Valid Sum
C_ALPHAN
M
AT 1006
AU 2183
BG 11 (1.0) 6 1069 1063
CA 54 (4.6) 1 (0.1) 27 (2.3) 22 (1.9) 30 1211 1181
CH 1037
CL 1505
CZ 1 (0.1) 47 1276 1229
DE-E 437 437
DE-W 2 850 848
DK 1322
ES 1212
FI 1379 1379
FR 1669
GB-GBN 873
HU 1021
IE 6 1065 1059
IL-A 152
IL-J 1066
JP 1102
KR 1315 1315
LV 12 (1.2) 1000 1000
NL 3 (0.2) 8 (0.4) 3 (0.2) 25 1823 1798
NO 1469
NZ 1036
PH 47 (3.9) 2 1200 1198
PL 1277
PT 1602
RU 2383 2383
SE 2 1186 1184
SI 7 (0.6) 7 1093 1086
SK 17 (1.5) 1152 1152
TW 2016
US 966 (79.6) 4 (0.3) 2 1216 1214
UY 1108
VE 1199
ZA 316 (12.7) 4 (0.2) 2483 2483
N Sum 47 1282 54 1 86 22 8 3 129 45993
N Valid Sum 47 1282 54 1 86 22 8 3 22009
page 441
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Denmark (DK):
52 Telephone interview after mailing, where the interviewer read out the questionnaire and noted the respondents'
answers
page 442
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 443
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 444
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
1 No weighting
page 445
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Note:
For more detailed information see variable ISCO88.
page 446
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 447
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 448
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
in Japan (JP):
0 Not available
Note:
For more detailed information see variable SPISCO88.
page 449
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 450
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 451
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
Contents page
V1 GESIS Data Archive Study Number 1
V2 GESIS Archive Version 2
V3 Respondent Number 3
COUNTRY Country/ Sample (ISO 3166) 4
C_ALPHAN Sample Prefix ISO 3166 Code - alphanumeric 6
V4 Q1a Most important group R identifies with 8
V5 Q1b Second most important group R identifies with 11
V6 Q1c Third most important group R identifies with 14
V7 Q2a How close do you feel to: Your town - city 17
V8 Q2b How close do you feel to: Your [county], province 19
V9 Q2c How close do you feel to: [Country] 21
V10 Q2d How close do you feel to: continent 23
V11 Q3a Important: to have been born in [Country] 25
V12 Q3b Important: To have [Country Nationality] citizenship 27
V13 Q3c Important: To have lived in [Country] for most of one’s life 29
V14 Q3d Important: To be able to speak [Country language] 31
V15 Q3e Important: To be a [religion] 33
V16 Q3f Important: To respect [Country Nationality] political institutions and laws 35
V17 Q3g Important: To feel [Country Nationality] 37
V18 Q3h Important: To have [Country Nationality] ancestry 39
V19 Q4a I would rather be a citizen of [Country] than of any other country in the world 41
V20 Q4b There are some things about [Country] today that make me feel ashamed of [Country] 43
V21 Q4c The world would be a better place if people from other countries were more like the [Country 45
Nationality]
V22 Q4d Generally speaking, [Country] is a better country than most other countries 47
V23 Q4e People should support their country even if the country is in the wrong. 49
V24 Q4f When my country does well in international sports, it makes meproud to be [Country 51
Nationality]
V25 Q4g I am often less proud of [Country] than I would like to be 53
V26 Q5a How proud: The way democracy works 55
V27 Q5b How proud: Its political influence in the world 57
V28 Q5c How proud: [Country’s] economic achievements 59
V29 Q5d How proud: Its social security system 61
V30 Q5e How proud: Its scientific and technological achievements 63
V31 Q5f How proud: Its achievements in sports 65
V32 Q5g How proud: Its achievements in the arts and literature 67
V33 Q5h How proud: [Country’s] armed forces 69
V34 Q5i How proud: Its history 71
V35 Q5j How proud: Its fair and equal treatment of all groups in society 73
V36 Q6a [Country] should limit the import of foreign products in order to protect its national economy. 75
V37 Q6b For certain problems, like environment pollution, international bodies should have the right to 77
enforce solutions
V38 Q6c [Country] should follow its own interests, even if this leads to conflicts with other nations 79
V39 Q6d Foreigners should not be allowed to buy land in [Country] 81
V40 Q6e [Country’s] television should give preference to [Country] films and programmes 83
page 452
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
V41 Q7a Large international companies are doing more and more damage to local businesses in 85
[Country].
V42 Q7b Free trade leads to better products becoming available in [Country]. 87
V43 Q7c In general, [Country] should follow the decisions of international organizations to which it 89
belongs, even if the govern
V44 Q7d International organizations are taking away too much power from the [Country Nationality] 91
government.
V45 Q7e Increased exposure to foreign films, music, and books is damaging our national and local 93
cultures.
V46 Q7f A benefit of the Internet is that it makes information available to more and more people 95
worldwide.
V47 Q8a It is impossible for people who do not share [Country’s] customs and traditions to become 97
fully [Country’s nationality]
V48 Q8b Ethnic minorities should be given government assistance to preserve their customs and 99
traditions
V49 Q9 Help minorities to preserve traditions 101
V50 Q10a Immigrants increase crime rates 103
V51 Q10b Immigrants are generally good for [Country’s] economy 105
V52 Q10c Immigrants take jobs away from people who were born in [Country] 107
V53 Q10d Immigrants improve [Country Nationality] society by bringing in new ideas and cultures 109
V54 Q10e Government spends too much money assisting immigrants 111
V55 Q11 Number of immigrants coming to country 113
V56 Q12 Are you a citizen of [Country],NL:What is your nationality? 115
V57 Q13 Parents citizen of (country) at birth 117
V58 Q14 Racial-ethnic group of R 119
V59 Q15a Children born in [Country] of parents who are not citizens should have the right to become 132
[Country Nationality] citizens
V60 Q15b Children born abroad should have the right to become [Country Nationality] citizens if at 134
least one of their parents is
V61 Q15c Legal immigrants to [Country] who are not citizens should have the same rights as [Country 136
Nationality] citizens.
V62 Q15d [Country] should take stronger measures to exclude illegal immigrants? 138
V63 Q16 How proud are you being country national 140
V64 Q17a What language speak at home 1st mention,NL:Language most spoken at home 142
V65 Q17b What language speak at home 2nd mention,NL:Other languages spoken at home 153
V66 Q18 One nation - Separate nation 163
V67 Q19a How close do you feel to your ethnic group 165
V68 Q19b R: More regional or national identity 167
V69 Q20 Heard-read about [European Union] 169
V70_1 Q21_1 Benefits from being member of [European Union]: EU MEMBERS 171
V70_2 Q21_2 Benefits from being member [European Union]: non EU MEMBERS 173
V71 Q22 [Country] should follow [European Union] decisions, even if it does not agree with them. 175
V72 Q23 EU should have more power than national government 177
V73 Q24a Vote if referendum to become new member 179
V74 Q24b Vote if referendum to remain member 181
SEX R: Sex 183
AGE R: Age 185
page 453
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 454
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 455
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 456
ISSP 2003 - National Identity II
GESIS Study No. 3910 (v2.1.0), http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4232/1.11449
page 457
Appendix
Variable Report 283
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
A. Study Descriptions
B. Characteristics of National Population
Appendix
Variable Report 283
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
A. Study Descriptions
Australia
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 4
Sample type: The sample was stratified by Austra lian states and territories using
population counts from the 2001 Census. The selection of individuals
within the stratified sam ple was random using the Electoral Roll for
Australia produced by the Austra lian Electoral Com mission (AEC).
The 2001 version of the Electoral Roll was updated for 2002 where
state and territory elections had taken place. This fram e includes all
registered voters who m ust be c itizens of Australia (or a British
subject on a Com monwealth electoral roll as at 25 January 1984).
Since voting in Australia is com pulsory, there is a very high
proportion of the adult Australia population covered by this frame—
approximately 92 percent in 2003.
The sampling method used a random number generator inserted as a
field in the electoral roll database; individuals were sorted using the
random number and then selected in order. The sam pled units were
named individuals.
Fieldwork Institute: Australian Social Science Data Archive
Fieldwork methods: Self-completion, paper and pencil, mailed to, mailed back by
respondent
Language: English
Weighted: No
Weighting Procedure:
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 5
Deviations from ISSP- For V4-V6 “Most im portant group R identifies with”, the response
questionnaire: categories were converted from numbers to letters (A, B, C….) after
a
piloting experiment revealed greater respondent accuracy with the
latter.
V8 “How close do you feel…”: re sponse category was State or
territory (appropriate internal regional breakdown for Australia.
V10 “How close do you feel…”: res ponse category was Asia (since
Australia is both a continent and country)
All changes were approved by the IS SP prior to the fielding of the
Survey.
Publications: Gibson, R. et al. The Australian Survey of Social Attitudes, 2003
[computer file]. Canberra: Australian Social Science Data Archive,
The Australian National University, 2004.
Appendix
Variable Report 283
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
B. Characteristics of National Population
Australia
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 8
The following data are made available to the ISSP from statistics derived from the Australian
Bureau of Statistics (ABS) publications incl uding the June 2001 Census. Please note that the
ABS does not com pile data on years of schooli ng completed. In its place, we have used
educational attainment data (see Table 3) to provide m eaningful comparisons between the
AuSSA 2003 sample and ABS data. For further information, please contact Shaun W ilson at
Shaun.Wilson@anu.edu.au
Table 1: Sex distribution of AuSSA sample versus Australian population (18 years and
over)
ABS – Census June difference
AuSSA 2003
2001
Male 46.9 49.1 -2.2
Female 53.1 50.9 +2.2
n=4,224 n=14,343,846
Source: Australian Survey of Social Attitudes, 2003; Australian Bureau of Statistics Pub. No. 3105.0.65.001
Australian Historical Population Statistics: TABLE 19 (Population age and sex, Australia, year ended 30
Principal investigators: Dr. Max Haller, Dr. Markus Hadler, Mag. Regina Ressler
Institut für Soziologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria
Response rates:
2200 A – Total issued (total sample)
76 B – Ineligible (address vacant, wrong ages..)
2124 C – (=A – B) Total eligible (in scope sample)
1669 D – Total ISSP questionnaires received
663 E – (= C – D; = F + G + H) Total no response
278 F – Refusals (refusing to take part)
385 G – Non-contact (never contacted)
- H – Other non-response
Language: German
Weighted: Yes
Weighting procedure: A weighting variable was computed, taking into account sex, age group
and province of residence.
Austria
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 12
SEX
Male 48,4%
Female 51,6%
AGE (groups)
0-14 14,4%
15-19 5,2%
20-24 5,0%
25-29 5,7%
30-34 7,1%
35-39 7,5%
40-44 6,7%
45-49 5,6%
50-54 5,5%
55-59 4,8%
60-64 4,8%
65-69 3,5%
70-74 3,5%
75-79 3,1%
80-84 1,6%
85+ 1,5%
Language: Bulgarian
Weighted: No
Weighting Procedure:
Deviations from ISSP- Missing questions V18, V23, V24 – because of technical reasons.
questionnaire:
Bulgaria
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 16
Table 1. comparisons between population by administrative centres and the sample data
Hard data Sample data
Administrative centres Hard data *
structure (%) (N=1 069)(%)
Blagoevgrad 343370 4,31 4,5
Burgaz 426028 5,34 5,2
Varna 465012 5,83 5,7
Veliko Turnovo 294790 3,70 3,6
Vidin 131215 1,65 1,5
Bratza 244881 3,07 2,8
Gabrovo 144849 1,82 2,2
Dobrich 217012 2,72 2,7
Kardjali 164958 2,07 3,6
Kustendil 163388 2,05 2,2
Lovech 171236 2,15 2,2
Montana 183353 2,30 2,2
Pazardjik 313059 3,93 4,2
Pernik 150318 1,89 1,5
Pleven 313630 3,93 4,8
Plovdiv 721905 9,05 8,6
Razgrad 153156 1,92 2,2
Ruse 267618 3,36 3,1
Silistra 142815 1,79 2,2
Sliven 220273 2,76 3,0
Smolian 140664 1,76 1,5
Sofia - City 1173811 14,72 11,2
Sofia- Region 273882 3,43 3,8
Stara Zagora 372849 4,68 5,2
Targoviste 138703 1,74 1,4
Haskovo 279067 3,50 3,9
Shumen 205198 2,57 2,5
Yambol 156631 1,96 2,2
Total 7973671 100 100
The first mailout of 3,000 packag es was mailed on January 29, 2004
and included a questionnaire, explan atory letter printed on the front
cover and a postage paid return envelope. On February 10th a
reminder postcard was mailed out to the entire sam ple. On February
26th a second m ailout was sent to the respondents who had not
returned their survey along with a additional letter explaining the
importance of their participation in the project.
Sample report
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 20
Weighted: Yes
Publications: None
Canada
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 22
Gender
Male 49.52
Female 50.48
Employment
Employed 62.4
Unemployed 7.5
Not in labour
force 30.10
Table I
Regional Breakdown of Population (%)
% Population 18 years % Population 18 years
1 1
Region of age and older Region of age and older
I Tarapacá 2,8 VII Maule 5,9
II Antofagasta 3,2 VIII Bío Bío 12,2
III Atacama 1,6 IX La Araucanía 5,6
IV Coquimbo 3,9 X Los Lagos 7,0
V Valparaíso 10,4 XI Aisén 0,6
VI Libertador Bdo. XII Magallanes and
O'Higgins 5,1 Antarctic 1,0
XIII Metropolitan 40,7
(Santiago)
1
Source: 2002 Census Data National Institute of Statistics.
Sampling Stages
First Stage
The first stage of the sam pling process sets the num ber of com pleted
interviews per cluster at 5; a cluster is defined as a block (m anzana) or
populated entity (entidad).1 The appli cation of 5 interviews per cluster
to the total num ber of interviews ta rgeted in the sam ple (1,505) yields
1 Bloc s (manzanas) are used in urban areas, while in rural areas the census equivalent is the entity (entidad).
k
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 25
I Tarapacá 7 1 8
II Antofagasta 10 0 10
III Atacama 5 0 5
IV Coquimbo 9 3 12
V Valparaíso 28 3 31
VI Libertador Bdo. O'Higgins 10 5 15
VII Maule 12 6 18
VIII Bío Bío 30 7 37
IX La Araucanía 11 6 17
X Los Lagos 14 7 21
XI Aisén 2 0 2
XII Magallanes and Antarctic 3 0 3
XIII Metropolitan (Santiago) 118 4 122
Using the m ost reliable digital in formation on hand, i.e. 2002 census
data, a cum ulative listing of population by province (provincia),
borough (comuna), district (distrito), zone (zona) and block (m anzana)
was prepared in the urban case; and by province, borough, district,
locality (localidad) and entity (entidad) in the rural case
(geographically arranged).
In both the rural and the urban case a fixed interval is set f or each
region by dividing the total population for that region by the number of
PSU’s assigned to it. W ithin each region, a purely random selection
process is f ollowed, such that each individual (as represented by
population statistics) has a calculable probability of being selected as
the reference point for a PSU.
Second Stage
Third Stage
In the second and third stages, the interviewer has to make a minimum
of three attem pts on three different days to try to reach the original
house or person to be interviewed. In these attem pts the interviewer
must deliver a letter signed by the CE P director explaining the nature
of CEP and the aims of the study.
4) Parks or stadiums
2 The total number of numbered dwellings was divided by 5 (the number of interviews per cluster); this gave an interval length, such that if it was 43/5 =
8, starting from the point randomly pre-assigned as the first dwelling, the interviewers went to dwelling No 9, then to No 17, and so on until 5 interviews were completed.
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 27
B. Households
C. Individuals
2) when the person selected cannot be located after three attem pts on
three different days, or will be away for a period longer than the
duration of fieldwork.
6) the selected individual is a fore igner with less than 5 years in the
country (unable to vote).
7) the person starts to answer but he/she does not want to finish the
interview.
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 28
Context of ISSP The National Identity 2003 m odule of the ISSP was carried out in
questionnaire how it is conjunction with 24 questions relating to Chilean political, econom ic
in the hard copy and social attitudes and tendencies.
questionnaire The questionnaire was structured as follows: firstly, the 24 questions
mentioned above, the com plete National Identity ISSP m odule, and,
finally, demographic variables.
Fieldwork methods: The surveys are carried out through personal interview.
Sample size: The sample size finally achieved was 1505 interviews
Response rates:
As was explained above in the s ection “Sample type”, the sam pling
method used by CEP involves the random replacement of those
blocks/entities, dwellings or individuals, which f or the reasons
described above cannot in the end be contacted.
Accordingly, keeping this in m ind and using the m ethod for counting
the response rate established by the ISSP, we have that:
However, for the type of sam pling used by CEP, these data are not
real. CEP uses the following method for calculating the response rate.
B = D1 + E1 + F1 + D2 + E2 + G + F2 = 197
where :
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 29
Weighted: No
Known systematic The sample design described above has been used in the last 17
properties: surveys and has given good results, so it can be stated that it does not
have properties that might be causing some type of bias in the results.
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 30
Deviations from ISSP- The questionnaire was translated as closely as possible from English
questionnaire: to Spanish, maintaining the meaning and significance of each
sentence and word.
Some general comments:
• In questions Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q9, Q10, Q11, Q15 and
Q16 the code “can´t choose” was replaced wiyh “don´t know” (8)
and “no answer”.(9)
• Due to problem s detected in th e pre-test, the question Q12 was
finally translated as follows “From what country/countries or
part(s) of the world did your dir ect ancestors, loke your parents,
grand parents, or great grand parents, come?”.
• Q12 is an open-ended questions, thus the data subm itted present a
very wide range of codes, so re searchers can group them as they
want to.
• Q8 was not included in the final version of the questionnaire due
to translation problems detected in the pretest.
• Regarding Q1: Due to problem s detected in the pre-test this
question was asked at the end of the National Identity Module.
DEMOGRAPHICS VARIABLES:
Publications: -
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 31
Chile
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 33
(%)
Gender
Male 48,5
Female 51,5
Age Group
18 - 24 16,3
25 - 34 22,9
35 - 54 38,6
55 or older 22,2
0 - 3 years 11,0
4 - 8 years 26,1
9 -12 years 38,9
13 or more years 24,0
Employment Status
Sources:
For Gender, age group and year of schooling: Census 2002 by National Institute of Statistics. Considers
population 18 years of age or older.
For employment status: Estimated by National Institute of Statistics. Oct-Dec 2003.
Percentage “Not in labour force” is based on population 15 years of age or older.
Czech Republic
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 35
Language: Czech
Weighted: Yes
ISSP 2003 data are weighted by the design weight (number of household members - see
Weighting).
Fieldwork dates: The fieldwork was conducted from 10. October 2003 to 31. January
2004.
University of Aarhus:
Department of Political Science
DK-8000 Aarhus C:
Prof. Emeritus Ole Borre
Prof. Lise Togeby
University of Copenhagen:
Associate prof. Hans Jørgen Nielsen
Department of Political science
Rosenborggade 15, DK-1130 Copenhagen K
Description (N)
Issued names 2000
Selected respondent moved, no forwarding address 6
Selected respondent too sick/incapacitated to
participate 43
Selected respondent deceased 2
Personal refusal by selected respondent 430
Other type of unproductive reaction 197
Full productive interviews 1322
Language: Danish
Source no. 1
SEX
Male 49,47 %
Female 50,53 %
AGE (groups)
0-9 12,6 %
10-19 11,8 %
20-29 12,1 %
30-39 15,0 %
40-49 14,0 %
50-59 14,0 %
60-69 10,0 %
70-79 6,5 %
80-89 3,4 %
90- 0,6 %
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Employed 50,92 %
Unemployed 2,22 %
Not in labor force 46,86 %
• Source to sex and age: Statistical Yearbook ( Statistisk tiårsoversigt 2004 – tema
om arbejdsstyrken). August 2004, 45. årgang, Danmarks statistik. Page 29, table of
agedistribution 1. January 2004.
Weighted: Weight variables are included in the data-set. Basic data is unweighted.
Weighting procedure: The design of the survey was system atic sampling. In order to
improve the efficiency of estim ation and to reduce bias due to non-
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 46
Known systematic Sampling frame is updated and covers total population. A cross-sectional
properties of the sample does not contain attrition by definition.
sample:
After having used our standard sampling procedures for over 20 years
we have not encountered any bias due to using systematic sampling.
Design effect of the sampling procedure<=1 by definition.
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 47
Deviations from ISSP- The questionnaire included ISSP module with necessary background
questionnaire: variables.
1) Age
Age is computed from a variable for year of birth in the Finnish
questionnaire (FQ).
2) Marital
FQ asked separately a category for those living together (married or
not married). They were recoded into same category. Added one
code, 0 meaning other (FQ).
3) Wrktype
Added one code, 8 meaning don’t know (FQ).
4) Spwrktyp
Added one code, 8 meaning don’t know (FQ).
5) Hhcycle
The FQ asked separately on how many persons in the household, how
many of them are 7-17 years old and how many children under 7
years of age there are in the household. Hhcycle includes combined
information from these variables.
6) SF_reg
Added from register data describing the regions. FQ did not include
question for this.
7) SF_size
Added from register data describing the population of the
municipality. FQ did not include question for this.
9) SF_ethn
Added from register data describing the ethnic identity (language
code). FQ did not include question for this.
Finland
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 49
AGE (groups)
- 14 927 009
15 - 29 969 877
30 - 39 695 102
40 - 49 769 644
50 - 64 1 046 099
65 – 74 440 655
75 - 357909
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Employed 2 372 000
Sample type: Equal probability sampling on the whole French European territory among
persons older than fifteen years living in the household.
Language: French
Weighted: Yes
Random sample of the population being more than 17 years old; sample size is 136,780
Sample type: Two stage random sample. Names and addresses from registers of
inhabitants kept by municipalities. Adults of 18 and older living in
private accommodation
Fieldwork institute: TNS Infratest Sozialforschung (Germany)
Sample size: 1287 (ISSP 2003 and ISSP 2004 were fielded in split together with
ALLBUS, the German General Social Survey; number of ALLBUS
2004 interviews: 2946; number of ISSP 2004 interviews: 1332)
Language: German
Weighted: No
Weighting procedure: Sample for eastern Germany deliberately over-samples the five
eastern federal states. If all of Germany is taken as the unit of analysis
(rather than the eastern and western states) weighting is necessary.
Weighting factor for West Germany: 1,232524;
weighting factor for East Germany: 0,547722;
(recoding of the country variable is necessary)
Known systematic None for the total sample
properties of the
sample:
Deviations from ISSP ISSP substantive questionnaire: no deviations;
questionnaire: Background variables: no deviations
Publications: ALLBUS Methods Report 2004 (forthcoming);
ISSP Methods Report on the German Study (forthcoming)
Germany
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 57
Gender3
Male 40356000
Female 42175700
Total 82531700
Age group4
Under 6 4519300
6-15 7642800
15-25 9621700
25-45 24461100
45-65 21426800
65 and above 14860000
total 82531700
Education5
Without general school-leaving certificate 1890000
Still at school 2992000
Secondary general school certificate 29391000
Certificate of ten-grad school of general education in the former GDR 4807000
Intermediate school-leaving certificate or equivalent 12732000
"Fachhochschule" entrance qualification/university entrance 14092000
qualification
No data on type of education 669000
Respondents providing data on general school education 66574000
Employment Status8
Employed 36172000
Unemployed9 4022000
Not in labour 42307000
force10
3
Population 31.12.2003, updated 20th December 2004.
4
Population 2003, updated 3. August 2004.
5
Persons who provided data on their general school education; persons aged 51 years and
above are not obliged to respond; results from Microcensus May 2003.
6
Degree from specialised college of higher education; including engineering qualification
and college of public administration degree.
7
Other types of vocational education not listed here.
8
Results from Microcensus May 2003.
9
Unemployed persons are looking for a job and immediately available.
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 58
Region11
Baden-Württemberg 10693000
Bayern 12423000
Berlin 3388000
Brandenburg 2575000
Bremen 663000
Hamburg 1734000
Hessen 6089000
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 1732000
Niedersachsen 7993000
Nordrhein-Westfalen 18080000
Rheinland-Pfalz 4059000
Saarland 1061000
Sachsen 4321000
Sachsen-Anhalt 2523000
Schleswig-Holstein 2823000
Thüringen 2373000
Total 82532000
10
The inactive population includes persons not engaged in economic activity who are looking
for a job but are not immediately available.
11
Population from 31.12.2003. Results of current population statistics.
Great Britain
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 60
Sample type: Clustered random sample: addresses were selected with equal probability
in a stratified clustered design. One person aged 18+ was interviewed per
address.
Language: English
Weighted: Yes
Weighting procedure: Addresses were selected with equal probability (except in Scotland
where allowance was made for MOI – see below) but only one person
interviewed at each address. Therefore weights need to be applied to
correct for different number of adults at each address. The weights are
calculated by the following formula:
weight = (number of households at the address * number of adults in
selected household) / MOI
where MOI is the Multiple Output Indicator (MOI>1 indicates more
than one household at the address).
Very large weights were capped and the weights were scaled to make the
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 61
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Employed 60.2% 56.5% 52.6%
Sample type: We used probability sample, which was selected in multiple stages with
proportional stratification. In the first stage, localities were chosen. In the second
stage, the respondents were chosen from the localities with simple random
sampling.
The names and addresses were obtai ned from the Central Registry
and Electoral Office with the help of simple random sampling.
Language: Hungarian
Table.1.a. Sex
Sample (unweighted
Census
data)
Male 44.2 48.8
Female 55.8 53.2
Total 100.0 100.0
Sample (unweighted
Census
data)
Primary level 58.8 60.8
Secondary level 23.3 27.2
Tertiary level 17.9 12.2
Total 100.0 100.0
Appendix 1.
Budapest Other city Village
Highest
educational level sex age N Sample Census N Sample Census N Sample Census
18-39 43 4,2% 1,5% 30 3,0% 5,6% 4 0,40% 5,2%
male 40-59 58 5,7% 1,1% 44 4,3% 4,6% 7 0,7% 4,8%
60-xx 48 4,7% 0,9% 40 3,9% 3,0% 12 1,2% 3,2%
Primary level
18-39 29 2,8% 1,0% 33 3,2% 4,1% 6 0,6% 3,9%
female 40-59 44 4,3% 1,1% 37 3,6% 4,4% 7 0,7% 4,3%
60-xx 64 6,3% 2,1% 69 6,8% 5,6% 23 2,3% 5,4%
18-39 4 0,4% 1,5% 19 1,9% 2,9% 8 0,80% 1,3%
male 40-59 12 1,2% 0,9% 17 1,7% 1,9% 6 0,6% 1,0%
60-xx 1 0,0% 0,4% 9 0,9% 0,8% 5 0,5% 0,3%
Secondary level
18-39 16 1,6% 1,8% 33 3,2% 3,9% 15 1,50% 2,0%
female 40-59 20 1,9% 1,5% 24 2,4% 3,1% 16 1,6% 1,4%
60-xx 2 0,2% 0,8% 17 1,7% 1,0% 9 0,9% 0,3%
18-39 4 0,4% 0,6% 12 1,2% 1,0% 12 1,2% 0,3%
male 40-59 7 0,7% 0,8% 18 1,8% 1,3% 9 0,9% 0,4%
60-xx 2 0,2% 0,6% 10 1,0% 0,6% 7 0,7% 0,1%
Tertiary level
18-39 6 0,6% 0,8% 17 1,7% 1,3% 7 0,7% 0,5%
female 40-59 9 0,9% 0,8% 23 2,3% 1,3% 12 1,2% 0,4%
60-xx 5 0,5% 0,3% 10 1,0% 0,3% 11 1,10% 0,1%
Hungary
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 69
Source no. 1 (N) Source no. 2 (N) Source no. 1 (%) Source no. 2 (%)
Census 2001 Census 2001 all Census 2001
Census 2001 (only aged over (total (only aged over
(full population) 18) population) 18)
10,198,315 8,111,555 100% 100%
SEX
Male 4,850,650 3,783,988 47.6 46.6
Female 5,347,665 4,327,567 52.4 53.4
AGE (groups)
0 - 17 2,086,760 - 20.5 -
18-29 1,873,078 1,873,078 18.4 23.1
30-39 1,309,591 1,309,591 12.8 16.1
40-49 1,533,309 1,533,309 15.0 18.9
50-59 1,314,018 1,314,018 12.9 16.2
60-69 1,025,606 1,025,606 10.0 12.6
70- 1,055,953 1,055,953 10.4 13.1
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
(aged over 15)
8,479,163
Employed 3,690,269 3,696,928 36.2 43.6
Unemployed 416,210 417,762 4.1 4.9
Not in labor force 6,091,836 4,364,473 59.7 51.5
Ireland
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 71
Sample type: The sample used in the ISSP survey was selected as a three-stage
clustered probability sample of the adult population drawn from the
electoral register.
First stage of sample selection
At the first stage of sam ple selection the national population on the
register was grouped into clusters with a minimum population size of
1,000 adults. (These clusters were based on the m ost geographically
disaggregated areal units availabl e in the country – the so-called
District Electoral Divisions (DEDs)). These clusters with a m inimum
population size of 1,000 persons constituted the prim ary sampling
units (PSUs). The PSUs were selected with a probability
proportionate to size (PPS). A to tal of 100 sam pling points was
selected.
Second stage of sample selection
At the second stage of selection the target household was selected
from within each PSU on a systematic basis using a random start.
Third stage of sample selection to identify the respondent
At the third stage we selected the target person f or interview within
household from within the set of persons aged 18 years or more using
a so-called ' next birthday' rule. Th e next birthday' rule is a sim ple
randomisation procedure which provides a random ly selected
respondent in much the same way as a Kish grid etc.
Fieldwork methods: Face-to-face
Known limitations: Using the Electoral Register as the population frame means that very
recently generated households which are not yet registered on the list
have, by definition, a zero probability of selection. This is not a
major issue and is, in fact, common to all population lists. The data
were reweighted using a minimum information loss program which
controls, inter alia, for age; gender; household size (number of adults
in the household); marital status; level of educational attainment;
region; principal economic status. This reweighting scheme addresses
any such small bias as may emerge from frame effects.
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 72
Response rates:
Language: English
Weighted: Yes
Weighting procedure: The data were re-weighted using a minimum information loss
algorithm called Gross. This is used in almost all surveys carried out
by the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin. It is similar
to the Calmar software prepared by Insee and is based on reconciling
distributions in the data to column marginals. The control variables
used in reweighting the ISSP were: number of adult sin the household,
gender, age cohort (8 categories), marital status, level of educational
attainment, principal economic status, and planning region.
Ireland
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 74
Sample type: First Stage: Division into strata (based of geographic location,
community size and socioeconomic characteristics).
Second Stage: Sampling of statistical areas (the smallest ecological unit)
within strata.
Third Stage: Sampling of starting point within statistical areas for the
interviewing.
Fourth Stage: Interviewing of specified number persons within statistical
unit based on kishgrid.
Weighted: None
Context of ISSP -
questionnaire:
Israel
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 78
Language: Japanese
Weighted: No
Deviations from ISSP SPISCO88 is not available.
questionnaire:
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 81
2. The Self-Employed
Those who operate shops, restaurants, plants, etc. each with 9 employees or less,
as well as their family workers
4. Industrial Workers
(Skilled Workers)
Locomotive-engine and motor-vehicle drivers
Those engaged in such work as manufacturing, repairs, assembly, processing,
printing, spinning, sewing, tailoring, packing and bailing
Carpenters, joiners, plasterers, cabinetmakers
(Manual/Unskilled Workers)
Laborers in mining, construction, manufacturing and transport
Street vendors, deliverymen, garbage collectors
8. Housewives
Women engaged mainly in housework
×Women who live alone are put in category 10 (Jobless)
9. Students
High school students Higher professional school students, junior college students,
university students, graduate school students, special school students and
miscellaneous school students
×Those who attend night high school or colleges, while working in the daytime, are
put in categories 1 to 7
10. Jobless
Those who are not now employed and those who live on pension, etc.
97. Refused
99. No Answer
Gender
Source; the latest National Population Census conducted in 2000
Age Group
Source; the latest National Population Census conducted in 2000
Schooling Group
(15 years old and more, includes 1.157.354 foreigners)
Source; the latest National Population Census conducted in 2000
Marital Status
(16 years old and more)
Source; the latest National Population Census conducted in 2000
Employment Status
(16age and more, includes 1.146.481 foreigners)
Source; the latest National Population Census conducted in 2000
Context of ISSP- ISSP module was fielded together with ISSP module “Family and
questionnaire: changing gender roles” (topic A) and it included the 3rd topic of
questions (C) on medical care.
Weighted: No
Weighting Procedure:
Known Systematic No
Properties in Sample:
Deviations from ISSP No
Questionnaire:
Publications: No
Latvia
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 89
Source No.1
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2003): Statistical Yearbook of Latvia 2003.
Source No.2
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia (2002): Results of the 2000 Population Census in Latvia.
Collection of statistical data.
Source No.3
(2003.) Macroeconomics of Latvia in figures 2003. Statistical yearbook.
Source No.4
Labour force survey results on the 4th quarter 2002. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia
(http://www.csb.lv)
The data will appear in the ISSP publicly released data as two
independent data-files. The user should be aware that the social
background variables are identical between these modules, and the
two files should be matched, not added.
The user should also be aware that the complete datafile (described in
this documentation), including all the collected information on
demography and social background, as well as the standardized ISSP
variable is available has been archived at DANS [Data Archiving and
Networked Services] in the Hague, the successor to the Steinmetz
Archive. The appropriate bibliographic reference to this file will be:
standard variables.
Language: Dutch
Weighted: No
Sample-frame information
Location of the sampled address. It is to be expected that response in
urban areas, and in particular in the four major cities (Amsterdam,
Rotterdam, The Hague, Utrecht) is lower than elsewhere.
Name: for about 11% of the sample there was no access to a name of
the inhabitants. This has decreased the response.
Phone: for about 32% of the sample there was no access to a phone
number. Apart from obstructing the opportunity to use the fourth and
fifth (phone) reminders, it is to be expected that not being listed in the
phone-register is a correlate of willingness to participate.
Foreign family name: Family names in the Netherlands can with
considerable accuracy be classified as foreign and non-foreign. In
particular Moroccan and Turkish names are easy to recognize, this is
much harder for Surinamese and Antillean names.
NAME* Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
k
No name 14.2 8.2 1.636 13.5
With name 85.1 91.9 0.944 86.5
PHONE* Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
k
No phone listed 32.9 24.1 1.346 32.5
Netherlands
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 97
NAME* Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
k
No name 14.2 8.2 1.636 13.5
With name 85.1 91.9 0.944 86.5
PHONE* Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
k
No phone listed 32.9 24.1 1.346 32.5
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 98
SEX** Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
k
Male 49.6 54.6 0.911 49.7
Female 50.3 45.4 1.107 50.3
AGE ** Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
k
16-24 12.2 6.5 1.753 11.5
25-34 14.8 14.4 1.052 15.2
35-44 20.1 21.5 0.977 21.0
45-54 19.2 20.6 0.927 19.2
55-64 17.9 19.6 0.907 17.7
65-74 10.3 10.9 0.905 9.4
75-hi 5.6 6.4 0.874 5.6
EDUCATION** Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
k
LO 6.4 6.8 1.007 6.8
LBO 17.8 16.5 1.022 16.8
MAVO 13.4 12.5 0.983 12.4
HAVO 5.9 5.2 1.074 5.6
VWO 4.4 4.2 1.062 4.5
MBO 18.6 18.2 1.065 19.3
HBO 22.8 25.7 0.943 24.3
WO 10.7 10.8 0.993 10.2
MARITAL Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
STATUS*** k
Married 57.0 56.9 0.955 51.6
Widower 7.1 7.3 0.968 7.1
Divorced 9.1 9.3 1.078 10.0
Never married 26.8 26.4 1.182 31.3
LAST Benchmar
Sample Weight Weighted
ELECTION*** k
Did not vote 20 9.4 2.134 80.1
Did vote 80 90.6 0.885 19.9
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 99
Known systematic
properties of the
sample: -
Publications: -
New Zealand
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 101
Context of ISSP Dedicated survey, with ISSP questions preceding non-ISSP questions
questionnaire: and demographics.
Sample size: 2200
Response rates:
2200 A - Total issued (total sample)
313 B - Ineligible (address vacant, wrong ages,...)
1887 C –(A - B) Total eligible
1038 D - Total ISSP questionnaires received
849 E - (=C – D; = F + G) Total non-response
70 F – Refusals
- G - Non-contact (never contacted)
779 H - Other non-response
Language: English
Weighted: No
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 102
Known Systematic
Properties in Sample:
Deviations from ISSP See notes
Questionnaire:
Publications:
Sampling procedure: The sample was randomly selected from the 2002 New Zealand
electoral roll, which contains the names of all registered voters over the
age of 18 years. The achieved sample is generally representative of the
New Zealand population over 18 years of age, but people under 30 are
underrepresented in the sample, while those over 30 are
overrepresented, and the proportion of women is higher than in the
population whereas the proportion of men is lower. The data have not
been weighted to correct this biases. However, comparisons of
unweighted survey results with results obtained from the sample
weighted so that its age-sex distribution matched that of the New
Zealand population over 18 (taken from the 2001 Census), showed only
minor differences between estimates.
Survey administration The questionnaire together with a covering letter was sent to the 2200
procedure: selected participants on 11 September 2003. A reminder letter and
another questionnaire were mailed to participants whose questionnaire
had not been returned by 25 September.
A second reminder and another questionnaire were sent to those who
had not returned their questionnaires by 16 October. A final reminder
letter (without an accompanying questionnaire) was sent to all
remaining non-respondents on 4 November. The survey was closed off
on 28 November, 12 weeks after the initial mailing.
New Zealand
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 104
Census Year
Age Group 1991 1996 2001
Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total
0 – 4 Years 141,492 135,654 277,146 144,111 135,489 279,603 138,693 132,108 270,801
5 – 9 Years 128,703 122,475 251,178 147,720 140,574 288,291 147,363 138,837 286,203
10 – 14 Years 130,272 125,046 255,318 135,663 128,523 264,186 148,632 142,107 290,739
15 – 19 Years 145,005 139,986 284,988 133,572 129,405 262,977 134,949 130,332 265,281
20 – 24 Years 135,978 135,117 271,095 134,832 136,926 271,758 118,791 120,993 239,784
25 – 29 Years 133,086 139,266 272,352 132,453 140,850 273,303 118,008 128,892 246,903
30 – 34 Years 133,728 138,627 272,355 142,452 151,032 293,484 132,198 147,081 279,276
35 – 39 Years 121,941 124,926 246,867 139,293 145,923 285,216 142,680 154,785 297,462
40 – 44 Years 118,272 118,986 237,261 125,436 129,600 255,036 138,501 147,120 285,618
45 – 49 Years 93,672 93,156 186,825 120,249 120,939 241,191 123,528 128,256 251,787
50 – 54 Years 79,833 79,893 159,726 93,351 93,366 186,717 116,955 119,217 236,169
55 – 59 Years 69,525 68,610 138,135 78,783 79,821 158,604 90,180 92,082 182,262
60 – 64 Years 70,611 70,302 140,913 67,422 67,845 135,264 75,840 78,729 154,569
65 – 69 Years 60,207 66,549 126,756 65,184 67,788 132,972 62,478 65,433 127,914
70 – 74 Years 43,401 55,830 99,228 51,759 61,902 113,661 56,145 62,112 118,257
75 – 79 Years 30,987 45,093 76,077 33,561 48,726 82,290 40,740 53,766 94,506
80 – 84 Years 16,890 29,847 46,737 20,409 34,869 55,281 22,803 38,310 61,110
85 – 89 Years 6,861 15,189 22,050 8,385 18,645 27,030 10,818 22,866 33,684
90 – 94 Years 1,779 5,355 7,131 2,382 6,840 9,225 3,042 8,763 11,805
95 – 99 Years 273 1,218 1,488 393 1,557 1,950 561 2,193 2,751
100 Years and
48 249 294 33 225 261 99 303 399
over
Total 1,662,555 1,711,371 3,373,926 1,777,461 1,840,839 3,618,303 1,823,007 1,914,273 3,737,277
Under 15 Years 400,467 383,175 783,642 427,500 404,583 832,080 434,688 413,055 847,740
15-64 Years 1,101,648 1,108,869 2,210,517 1,167,849 1,195,707 2,363,553 1,191,630 1,247,481 2,439,111
65 years and over 160,440 219,330 379,767 182,115 240,552 422,667 196,686 253,737 450,426
Median Age 30.6 32.0 31.3 32.2 33.6 33.0 34.0 35.6 34.8
All cells in this table have been randomly rounded to base 3.
Age Group
Highest Qualification and
15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49
Sex
Years Years Years Years Years Years Years
Male 37,782 18,339 18,723 26,124 29,253 29,457 27,498
No Qualification Female 30,084 13,974 16,476 24,168 26,949 28,374 28,467
Total 67,866 32,313 35,199 50,292 56,202 57,828 55,968
Male 29,529 14,106 15,285 17,463 18,738 17,583 15,927
Fifth Form
Female 28,329 11,799 16,203 24,696 26,211 24,786 22,128
Qualification
Total 57,858 25,905 31,488 42,162 44,949 42,366 38,055
Male 22,596 14,391 14,139 13,578 14,265 12,396 10,038
Sixth Form
Female 24,705 14,883 18,345 21,138 22,053 17,217 10,878
Qualification
Total 47,301 29,271 32,484 34,719 36,321 29,613 20,913
Higher School Male 18,138 22,203 9,828 5,349 4,431 3,888 3,726
Qualification Female 21,312 21,615 9, 087 4,707 4,041 2,952 2,514
Total 39,447 43,815 18,915 10,056 8,472 6,840 6,240
Male 147 84 63 84 84 96 81
Other NZ School
Female 105 69 72 81 90 75 69
Qualification
Total 252 156 135 165 171 171 150
Male 2,805 4,104 4,395 5,985 7,395 7,170 6,699
Overseas School
Female 2,883 4,785 5,889 8,151 9,786 9,315 8,352
Qualification
Total 5,691 8,889 10,287 14,136 17,181 16,485 15,048
Basic Vocational Male 3,678 7,989 5,694 5,022 4,965 4,680 4,035
Qualification Female 4,245 9,888 8,526 7,050 6,966 6,453 4,779
Total 7,923 17,874 14,220 12,075 11,931 11,133 8,814
Skilled Vocational Male 912 4,308 8,772 12,960 14,304 14,460 11,556
Female 861 2,742 4,011 4,947 6,063 6,150 4,464
Qualification
Total 1,776 7,047 12,780 17,904 20,370 20,610 16,020
Intermediate Male 1,278 2,994 3,012 3,906 4,809 4,848 3,765
Vocational Female 2,145 4,752 3,417 2,901 2,577 2,097 1,467
Qualification
Total 3,426 7,746 6,426 6,804 7,389 6,945 5,232
Advanced Male 624 4,758 6,855 7,941 9,225 9,663 9,186
Vocational Female 1,053 6,663 10,977 13,746 15,525 18,189 16,866
Qualification Total 1,677 11,421 17,829 21,690 24,753 27,852 26,049
Bachelors Degree Male 114 9,615 13,425 13,164 13,296 12,294 10,290
Female 162 15,672 18,690 15,867 14,718 12,270 9,267
Total 273 25,287 32,115 29,037 28,011 24,567 19,557
Male 24 2,061 4,605 5,871 6,888 7,026 6,543
Higher Degree Female 33 2,655 5,757 6,363 6,297 5,874 5,337
Total 57 4,719 10,359 12,237 13,182 12,900 11,880
Male 17,328 13,842 13,215 14,742 15,027 14,940 14,190
Not Elsewhere Female 14,406 11,502 11,445 13,257 13,509 13,365 13,668
Total 31,734 25,344 24,663 28,002 28,536 28,305 27,861
Male 134,949 118,794 118,011 132,198 142,680 138,501 123,528
Total Female 130,332 120,990 128,892 147,081 154,785 147,117 128,256
Total 265,284 239,784 246,900 279,276 297,462 285,618 251,784
Age Group
50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85 Years
Total
Years Years Years Years Years Years Years and over
32,412 28,332 25,152 21,273 19,404 12,765 6,477 4,197 337,188
35,502 30,693 27,657 23,583 21,789 17,220 12,033 12,075 349,038
67,914 59,025 52,806 44,856 41,190 29,982 18,510 16,272 686,223
13,008 9,105 6,936 5,439 4,155 3,117 2,067 1,173 173,631
17,940 12,687 9,405 6,492 4,998 4,209 3,390 2,346 215,628
30,951 21,792 16,344 11,934 9,153 7,326 5,457 3,522 389,259
6,234 4,131 3,390 3,069 3,177 3,189 2,058 1,233 127,881
6,147 4,083 3,216 2,598 2,844 3,231 2,349 1,908 155,604
12,381 8,214 6,603 5,667 6,021 6,420 4,410 3,144 283,482
3,411 2,181 1,530 1,254 1,263 1,077 696 450 79,425
2,226 1,473 1,353 1,176 1,458 1,626 1,122 903 77,553
5,634 3,657 2,883 2,433 2,718 2,706 1,818 1,353 156,981
81 87 105 96 60 60 30 30 1,191
96 84 105 90 93 123 63 69 1,287
177 174 207 186 153 183 93 99 2,478
7,218 6,210 6,390 5,877 4,887 2,901 1,302 714 74,061
8,205 7,029 6,852 5,979 4,920 3,966 2,091 1,434 89,637
15,423 13,239 13,245 11,859 9,807 6,867 3,387 2,148 163,695
3,408 2,364 1,821 1,287 915 525 246 147 46,776
3,954 2,502 1,821 1,128 846 633 369 255 59,415
7,365 4,866 3,642 2,412 1,761 1,155 615 402 106,188
9,897 7,323 5,862 4,008 2,964 1,650 705 366 100,044
3,228 1,788 1,212 771 579 384 240 144 37,587
13,122 9,111 7,074 4,776 3,543 2,034 942 510 137,628
3,321 2,190 1,398 918 678 345 141 51 33,642
999 438 204 90 63 42 27 24 21,249
4,317 2,625 1,602 1,008 741 387 165 75 54,891
8,052 5,433 3,870 2,844 2,310 1,614 654 300 73,326
14,850 10,776 8,643 6,621 5,157 3,528 1,929 1,335 135,855
22,899 16,209 12,513 9,468 7,467 5,139 2,583 1,632 209,181
8,634 5,310 3,729 2,532 2,349 1,728 867 531 97,881
6,306 3,372 2,109 1,365 999 633 342 276 102,051
14,940 8,682 5,841 3,897 3,348 2,361 1,209 804 199,932
6,096 3,909 2,379 1,563 1,266 936 519 300 49,983
4,179 2,328 1,311 666 558 396 228 186 42,168
10,272 6,234 3,690 2,229 1,824 1,335 750 486 92,154
15,186 13,602 13,275 12,318 12,720 10,839 7,041 5,025 193,287
15,582 14,832 14,838 14,871 17,811 17,775 14,127 13,161 214,155
30,771 28,431 28,116 27,189 30,528 28,611 21,168 18,186 407,439
Age Group
Work and Labour Force
15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44
Status and Sex
Years Years Years Years Years Years
Labour Force
Employed Full-time
Male 31,023 67,935 85,491 101,199 111,426 109,284
Female 18,210 51,819 63,876 61,839 63,201 70,008
Total 49,230 119,754 149,367 163,041 174,630 179,289
Employed Part-time
Male 30,699 12,774 6,633 6,189 6,654 6,615
Female 37,827 20,754 19,047 30,720 40,341 37,776
Total 68,526 33,531 25,683 36,912 46,995 44,391
Total Employed
Male 61,719 80,712 92,124 107,391 118,083 115,899
Female 56,037 72,573 82,926 92,562 103,542 107,781
Total 117,756 153,285 175,050 199,953 221,625 223,683
Unemployed
Male 15,897 11,793 8,067 7,239 6,618 5,706
Female 17,271 11,442 8,307 7,854 7,575 6,240
Total 33,168 23,238 16,374 15,093 14,196 11,946
Total Labour Force
Male 77,619 92,505 100,191 114,630 124,698 121,605
Female 73,311 84,015 91,233 100,416 111,120 114,021
Total 150,924 176,520 191,427 215,046 235,821 235,629
Total
Male 134,949 118,794 118,011 132,195 142,680 138,501
Female 130,332 120,990 128,892 147,081 154,785 147,117
Total 265,284 239,784 246,900 279,279 297,462 285,618
Unemployment Rate
Male 20.5 12.7 8.1 6.3 5.3 4.7
Female 23.6 13.6 9.1 7.8 6.8 5.5
Total 22.0 13.2 8.6 7.0 6.0 5.1
All cells in this table have been randomly rounded to base 3.
Age Group
45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65 Years and Total
Years Years Years Years over
Fieldwork methods: The survey was conducted as a mail survey. The fieldwork included one
reminder and two follow-ups with questionnaires
Sample size: 1469
Language: Norwegian
Weighted: No
Weighting procedure:
Publications:
Norway
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 112
Region,%:
Central east counties 2 & 3 22.5 21.6
East counties 1, 4 - 8 27.7 28.6
South counties 9 - 10 5.7 5.3
West counties 11 - 15 25.3 26.0
Middle counties 16 & 17 8.6 9.5
North counties 18 - 20 10.1 9.1
N 3 271 478 1 469
12
Source: Statistics Norway
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 113
Education,%:
Primary school 16.8 16.1 18.7 13.7
Secondary 52.7 54.7 41.7 46.3
University/college, >= 1 year 30.1 28.9 38.1 35.9
Missing 0.3 0.2 0.8 1.4
13
Deviation from WRKST variable in dataset, due to different recodings
14
Source: Statistics Norway
Philippines
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 115
Fieldwork: Location:
The ISSP 2003 Module on Identity survey covers the entire
Philippines and had four
major study areas: National Capital Region (NCR), Balance Luzon
(outside NCR),
Visayas and Mindanao.
Timetable:
National Capital Region - March 10 - 25, 2003
Balance Luzon - March 14 - 25, 2003
Visayas - March 15 - 23, 2003
Mindanao - March 15 - 24, 2003
Respondents:
The gathered data through on voting-age through face-to-face interviews
of voting-age adults (18 y ears old and above). It asked a host of questions
about political, social and economic issues, som e undertaken as regular
indicators monitored over time and others reflective of current concerns as
well as specific personal inform ation. It also obtained information and
background characteristics about the household, the household head
and family members.
Sampling Method: Sampling Sizes and Error Margins. An indicator of data quality used
is the standard error of the estimate, on which the margin for
sampling error is based. As survey statistics are mostly proportions,
the key measure of data precision is the standard error of a proportion
taken from a sample. It is computed as follows:
±Z* p(1-p)/n
Once the sample municipalities were selected, 60 spots for each of the
major areas were allocated among the sample municipalities. Using the
quota set for spots in each region, the spots were distributed in such a
way that each municipality was assigned a number of spots roughly
proportional to its population size.
For the fourth stage, within each sample spot, five households were
established by systematic sampling. In sample (urban) precincts, a
random corner was identified; a random start generated; and the interval
was seven. In ascertained urban barangays (with no precinct maps), the
designated starting point was the same as in rural barangays – it was a
school, the barangay captain’s house, a church/chapel or a
barangay/municipal hall. The sampling interval for urban barangays was
seven, while for rural barangays it was two.
For the fifth and final stage, as discussed earlier, a respondent was
randomly chosen from among the voting-age adults in each selected
household using a probability respondent selection table.
Research a. Preparation
Methodology:
1. Questionnaire
3. Training
b. Field Work
1. Supervision
Supervisors reporting to the field manager monitored the study
full-time. They observed interviewers, (at least 10% of total
interviewers were observed by supervisors), followed-up and did
surprise checks on the field interviewers. They also ensured that
field logistics were received promptly and administered properly.
2. Spot-checking
Spot-checking was done at various stages of fieldwork. The first
one took place after about 30% of interviews were completed.
The second spot-checking was conducted after 60% completion
and the last one, immediately after 90% completion of
interviewing.
During spot-checking, at least 20% of the unsupervised
interviews were reinterviewed/backchecked.
d. Field Editing
(a). After each interview, the interviewer was asked to go over her
own work and check for consistency.
(b). All accomplished interview sheets were submitted to the
assigned group supervisor who, in turn, edited every interview.
(c). Data Processing
(1) An office editor conducted a final consistency check on all
interviews prior to coding.
(2) Interview sheets were edited/checked twice by office
editors before the information was encoded into diskettes.
(3) A data entry computer program verified and checked the
consistency of the encoded data before data tables were
generated.
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 121
The SPSS version of the data file is already weighted according to the
above projection factors. As the data are weighted, the total number of
cases that appear is 46,474. This figure is in thousands, i.e.,
46,473,919 persons representing NSO’s projected number of adults
(18 years old and above) for year 2002 based on the 1995 Census.
Researchers who are defining data using the ASCII files should apply
these projection factors.
Philippines
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 123
Educational Attainment*
Number Percent
Household Population 5 Years Old or Over 59,071,714 100.00
No Grade Completed 4,394,719 7.44
Pre-school 1,931,882 3.27
Elementary 25,620,407 43.37
1st – 4th Grade 12,641,243 21.40
5th – 7th Grade 12,979,164 21.97
High School 16,448,857 27.85
Undergraduate 8,409,260 14.24
Graduate 8,039,597 13.61
Post-secondary 1,340,813 2.27
Undergraduate 263,303 0.45
Graduate 1,077,510 1.82
College Undergraduate 4,071,236 6.89
Academic Degree Holder 4,380,472 7.42
Post-Baccalaureate 114,839 0.19
Not Stated 768,489 1.30
*Source: National Statistics Office 1995 Census of Population, Report No.2, Socio-Economic and Demographic
Characteristics
Poland
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 126
Assumed sample size was divided up into the strata taking into
consideration different completion rates in classes of places of living in
voivodships. It means that from classes of places of living where the
completion rates are known to be lower then in other there was an over-
representative sub-sample sampled.
3. In each stratum at least two small areas were sampled. From each
small area six adults living in different locations and in different
households were sampled.
Fieldwork methods: Self-administered supplement completed after the PGSS and face-to-
face interview and after ISSP 2004 Citizenship which was also face-
to-face (self-administered/interviewer attending =76,6%) +
(face-to-face interview = 23,3%) and in one case the way stays
unknown (that is 0.1%) [see MODE-variable in the Polish data file]
Language: Polish
Weighted: YES
Weighting procedure: Weighting procedure assumes that after weighting the sample
size is equal to the number of completed interviews.
r is
weight: W1 is = n *n
∑i=1
r is
where:
i – record ID , i=1,2,.......n
n – the number of completed questionnaires
N – the number of inhabitants who are 18 or older.
r is - completion rate in the class of place of living s where
the i interview was conducted.
LW s
r is -------------
LZR s
⎛ ⎞
⎜ Xk ⎟
⎜ ⎟ * 100
⎜ ∑ Xk ⎟
⎝ k ⎠
W2 i = k
⎛ nk ⎞
⎜ ∑ W1isk ⎟
⎜ i k =1 ⎟ * 100
⎜ n ⎟
⎜ ∑ W1is ⎟
⎝ i =1 ⎠
⎛ ⎞
⎜ n = ∑ nk ⎟
⎝ k ⎠
⎛ n
⎞
⎜ n = ∑ W1is ⎟
⎝ i =1 ⎠
where:
X k - number of people in k-category according to GUS data
X= ∑ X k
k
i k - questionnaires by record ID which belong to the k-
category
n k - total number of questionnaires which are rated to k-
category
WX isk = W1 is * W2 i k
questionnaire:
Publications: None
Poland
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 131
Central
Statistical Polish General Polish General
Office (GUS) Social Survey Social Survey
December January 2005 January 2005
2002 (unweighted) (weighted)
Principal Manuel Villaverde Cabral, Jorge Vala, Alice Ramos, all at Instituto de
investigators: Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa.
Weighted: Yes
Sampling procedure:
Sampling procedure:
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 134
Table 1 - Resident population with 18 or more years old excluding localities with
less than 10 dwelings
Weighting procedure: Data were weighted in order to reproduce the population distribution
according to the following variables: NUTSII, size of locality, age
groups, gender and educational level.
Note: The data concerns only the population reside nt in the Mainland (excluding Azores and
Madeira)
Total M F
n % n n
18-24 years 1027112 12,9 519869 507243
25-34 years 1500736 18,9 750821 749915
35-44 years 1427556 18 701148 726408
45-54 years 1274953 16,1 612557 662396
55-64 years 1079933 13,6 506495 573438
65-74 years 953558 12 424828 528730
75 and more 675038 8,5 257853 417185
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estatística, Censos 2001
Education
Note: The data concerns all the population (including Azores and Madeira)
Note: The data concerns only the population reside nt in the Mainland (excluding Azores and
Madeira)
Russia
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 142
Selection primary sampling units (PSUs). All cities over 500, 000
inhabitants were included in the sample as self-representative units.
Urban and rural settlements were considered as primary sample units
(PSUs). In each stratum (except strata of cities over 500,000 and 2
capital cities) the number of PSUs was calculated on the limitation of
15 interviews per PSU and the PSUs as well were selected with the
probability to its sizes (the number of its inhabitants). The total numbers
of interviews accounted for a stratum was distributed approximately
equally among selected PSUs. Totally 101 PSUs were selected.
Language: Russian
Weighted: yes, a weighting factor exists in the data set
Weighting procedure: exact description of the weighting procedure / algorithm
a) Main principles of weighting procedure
The total expected number N of respondents for a certain region being
treated equal
N = N0 * P ,
where N0 denotes the size of total sample, P - the
share of the region population in the entire population.
SEX
Male 45,57
Female 54,43
AGE (groups)
18-24 13,53
25-39 28,12
49-54 28,90
55+ 29,45
Unemployed 9.5
Weighted: Yes
Weighting procedure: Total weight is constructed from stratification weights based on sex,
education and age.
The weights were derived from data of Slovak Statistical Office
(Census 2001)
Known systematic Due to response differences the basic socio-demographic characteristics
properties of the – sex and level of education – are significantly different from the known
sample: population characteristics. The problem was corrected by the post-
stratification weights (see above).
Deviations from ISSP 22 questions were added in the questionnaire – answers are not included
questionnaire: in the data-file sent to the archive.
Publications:
Slovak Republic
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 149
Source: Population and Housing Census 2001, Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic
AGE (groups)
18 - 29 25,8 23,3 26,3
30 - 39 21,4 18,6 18,0
40 - 49 22,2 20,7 19,7
50 - 59 18,4 15,9 14,6
60 - 12,3 21,5 20,2
Source: Population and Housing Census 2001, Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic
YEARS OF SCHOOLING (groups)
No formal 0,8 0,4 0,4
qualification
Lowest formal 7,7 21,6 26,4
qualification
Above lowest 29,4 29,4 30,2
qualification
Higher secondary 31,7 26,8 32,0
completed
Above higher 7,8 5,8 1,0
secondary level
University degree 17,0 11,1 9,8
completed
Source: Population and Housing Census 2001, Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Employed 60,1 52,2 66,8
Source: Population and Housing Census 2001, Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic
Slovenia
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 151
Study title: Slovene Public Opinion Survey 2003/2: International Survey on Family
and National Identity and Attitudes on Local Democracy
Principal Niko Toš, Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research Centre
investigators: (CJMMK), Ljubljana.
Sample type: Universe: The adult residents of SR Slovenia, older then 18 years,
living on permanent address. Excluded: Institutionalised people.
Central Register of Population (a list of names and addresses
constantly undated by public administration) is employed as a
sampling frame. Sampling procedure: The sample is two-stage
stratified random sample from Central Register of Population , where
every population unit has equal probability of selection. First stage
PSU selection is made by probability proportional to size of CEA
(Clusters of Enumeration Areas). CEA are stratified according to 12
regions*6 type of settlement. At second stage systematic random
selection inside CEA brings fixed numbers of persons with name and
address. Spilit-halves samples were used for parallel SJM surveys.
Fieldwork institute: Public Opinion and Mass Communication Research Centre (CJMMK),
Ljubljana
Context of ISSP- ISSP 2002 questionnaire lie at the beginning of the SJM 2003/2
questionnaire: questionnaire. Then follows the ISSP 2003.
Sample size: 1093
Language: Slovenian
Weighted: No
Slovenia
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 153
SEX
Male 48,8%
Female 51,2%
AGE (groups)
0 – 14 15,3%
15 – 29 21,5%
30 – 44 22,7%
45 – 64 25,8%
65+ 14,7%
Weighted: Yes
Weighting procedure: Basic sampling weight bas3d on SAS Procedure Survey Select
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 156
Known systematic Disproportionately large samples were selected from areas know to
properties of the be inhabited by the two smallest components of the population,
sample: namely (i) areas with dominantly Indian populations and (ii) the
Northern Cape
Deviations from ISSP Q 6b ; Q7b o ; Q10 ; Q11 ; Q13 Ommitted due to difficult phrasing and
questionnaire: confusion with concept of immigrants
Publications:
South Africa
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 158
SEX
0 - 4 4 443 621
5 - 9 4 668 722
10 - 14 4 654 100
15 - 19 4 180 716
20 - 24 3 982 353
25 - 29 3 455 728
30 - 34 3 074 201
35 - 39 2 653 755
40 - 44 2 138 626
45 - 49 1 677 525
50 - 54 1 268 895
55 - 59 1 069 936
60 - 64 890 536
65 - 69 758 887
70 - 74 482 163
75 - 79 377 428
80 - 84 178 902
85 + 24 137 284
Unspecified 490 194
Total 40 583 573
Employment status
Language: Korean
Weighted: no
Weighting procedure: -
Known systematic
properties of the -
sample:
z In question W RKHRS: Those who are self-em ployed or
Deviations from ISSP helping family member are not asked about their work hour.
questionnaire: We modified code:
KR: 95. Those who are self-employed or helping family member.
z In question W RKTYPE & SPW KRTYP: ‘0’ include those
who are helping family member.
z In question WRKSUP: Those who have no current job are not
asked about their supervisory experiences. They are coded on
‘3’ (KR: 3).
z In question ATTEND: we modified code:
KR: 00 Those who have no religion
Gender
Male 16914865 49%
Female 17384074 51%
AGE(groups)
18-19 1643990 5%
20-29 7945164 23%
30-39 8280181 24%
40-49 6948359 20%
50-59 4318722 13%
60-69 3164971 9%
70-79 1518719 4%
80- 476965 1%
Total 34297071 100%
Less than200 -
200 ˜ 400 -
400 ˜ 600 6.2
600 ˜ 800 4.2
800 ˜ 1,000 5.6
1,000 ˜ 1,200 6.8
1,200 ˜ 1,500 9.9
1,500 ˜ 2,000 18.8
2,000 ˜ 2,500 15.0
2,500 ˜ 3,000 11.3
3,000 ˜ 4,000 12.2
More than 4,000 10.0
Total 100.0
Spain
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 166
Sample type: Representative Sample of Adults Aged 18 Years and over Living
Private Households in Spain
Language: Spanish
Weighted: Yes
Known Systematic
Properties of the
sample: None
Deviations from ISSP
Questionnaire:
SEX
Male 20.021.850
Female 20.825.521
AGE (groups)
18-24 years 4.240.700
25-34 6.875.075
35-44 6.319.966
45-54 5.042.813
55-64 4.063.263
65 years and over 6.964.267
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Employed 15.945,60
Unemployed 1.869,10
Not in labour force 15.834,40
Sweden
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 170
Sample type: Two representative samples of the Swedish population 17-79 years.
The samples were subjected to different fieldwork methods, with
obvious implications for the response rate.
Fieldwork details
Sample 1 Sample
2
29/1 Introductory letter about the survey X
3/2 Postal survey X
4/2 Postal survey + lottery ticket X
10/2 Postal reminder X
11/2 Postal reminder + questionnaire X
24/2 Postal reminder + questionnaire X
25/2 Postal reminder + questionnaire X
14/3 Postal reminder (+ questionnaire to those X
with unknown telephone numbers)
17-27/3 Reminder by telephone X
17-31/3 Reminder by telephone (+ questionnaire to X
those wishing a questionnaire)
Context of ISSP Separate survey
questionnaire:
Language: Swedish
Weighted: No
Response rates:
Sample 1
1000 A – Total issued (total sample)
38 B – Ineligible
962 C – (=A-B) Total eligible (in scope sample)
674 D – Total ISSP questionnaires received (70%)
288 E – (=C-D;=F+G+H) Total non-response
62 F – Refusals (refusing to take part)
185 G – Non-contact (never contacted)
41 H – Other non-response
Sample 2
1000 A – Total issued (total sample)
47 B – Ineligible
953 C – (=A-B) Total eligible (in scope sample)
512 D – Total ISSP questionnaires received (54%)
441 E – (=C-D;=F+G+H) Total non-response
110 F – Refusals (refusing to take part)
266 G – Non-contact (never contacted)
65 H – Other non-response
Samples 1+2
2000 A – Total issued (total sample)
85 B – Ineligible
1915 C – (=A-B) Total eligible (in scope sample)
1186 D – Total ISSP questionnaires received (62%)
729 E – (=C-D;=F+G+H) Total non-response
172 F – Refusals (refusing to take part)
451 G – Non-contact (never contacted)
106 H – Other non-response
AGE
17-24 72 58 65
25-34 63 41 52
35-44 71 52 61
45-54 70 53 62
55-64 75 63 69
65-79 70 56 63
REGION(*)
North 79 61 69
Mid North 74 52 62
Mid East 69 53 61
Stockholm 64 48 56
West 76 55 64
Göteborg 77 60 69
Småland+Gotland 60 57 59
South 71 40 58
Malmö 66 67 67
URBAN-RURAL(**)
Stockholm 64 48 56
Urban 1 72 51 62
Urban 2 66 54 60
Rural 1 77 54 66
Rural 2 74 62 68
Göteborg region 77 60 69
Malmö etc. region 66 67 67
Sweden
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 174
AGE
17-24 11 11 11 12 12 12
25-34 18 18 18 16 13 15
35-44 19 19 19 20 19 19
45-54 18 18 18 18 18 18
55-64 18 18 18 19 21 20
65-79 16 16 15 15 17 16
REGION(*)
North 10 12 11 11 13 12
Mid North 10 12 11 10 11 11
Mid East 16 16 16 16 16 16
Stockholm 21 19 20 19 17 18
West 8 10 9 9 10 9
Göteborg 10 9 9 11 10 10
Småland+Gotland 9 9 9 8 9 9
South 11 8 9 11 6 9
Malmö 5 6 5 5 8 6
URBAN-
RURAL(**)
Stockholm 21 19 20 19 17 18
Urban 1 35 35 35 36 34 35
Urban 2 18 20 19 17 20 18
Rural 1 6 6 6 7 6 6
Rural 2 5 5 5 6 6 6
Göteborg region 10 9 9 11 10 10
Malmö region 5 6 5 5 8 6
EDUCATION(**
*)
No information
available 2
Primary school 26
Secondary school
2 years 27
Secondary school
3 years 18
University
Less than 3 years 13
University
3 years or more 15
EMPLOYMENT
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 175
STATUS (****)
Employed 74
Unemployed 4
Not in labour 22
force
(***) Education register (SUN2000 adjusted to ISCED) age 16-74 (2002).
(****) Labour force surveys (AKU) age 16-64 (2003).
AB Stockholms län
C Uppsala län
D Södermanlands län
E Östergötlands län
F Jönköpings län
G Kronobergs län
H Kalmar län
I Gotlands län
K Blekinge län
M Skåne län
N Hallands län
O Västra Götalands län
S Värmlands län
T Örebro län
U Västmanlands län
W Dalarnas län
X Gävleborgs län
Y Västernorrlands län
Z Jämtlands län
AC Västerbottens län
BD Norrbottens län
REGION
Stockholm
(including the suburb municipalities)
Urban 1
(Municipalities (MC) with more than 90 000 inhabitants within an area of 30 kilometres radius from the MC
centre)
Urban 2
(MC:s with more than 27 000 inhabitants and less than 90 000 inhabitants within an area of 30 kilometres
radius of the MC centre and in the same time with more than 300 000 inhabitants within 100 kilometres
radius of the MC centre)
Rural 1
(MC:s with more than 27 000 inhabitants and less than 90 000 inhabitants within an area of 30 kilometres
radius of the MC centre and in the same time with less than 300 000 inhabitants within 100 kilometres
radius of the MC centre)
Rural 2
(MC:s with less than 27 000 inhabitants within an area of 30 kilometres radius of the centre)
Göteborg region
(Göteborg including the suburb municipalities)
Malmö region
(Malmö, Lund, Trelleborg including the suburb municipalities)
Switzerland
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 178
Fieldwork dates: May the 6th 2002 until August the 25th 2003
Sample type: The ISSP 2003 survey was combined with the „Eurobarometer in
Switzerland“ (EBCH) survey. The questions related to the
„Eurobarometer in Switzerland“ were first asked followed by those of
the ISSP 2003 using the CAPI method. The sampling procedure was
the following:
Fieldwork institute: MIS Trend, Institut pour l’étude des marchés et les sondages
d’opinion, Pont-Bessières 3, 1005 Lausanne
Weighted: yes
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 179
Weighting procedure: The weights were defined according to the following criteria:
- Size of household
- Age
- Gender
- Language
- Employment status
The estimation of size of household, age, gender, language is based
on the Swiss federal census 2000 and the estimation of the
employment status on the Swiss Labour Force Survey 2002.
The size of the household was recoded into the following four
categories:
1) Household with 1 person
2) Household with 2 persons
3) Household with 3 persons
4) Household with 4 persons and more
The weights result from the division of the expected through the
observed value. This process was repeated until convergence.
AGE (groups)
18-24 Jahre 10.4
25-34 Jahre 18.6
35-44 Jahre 20.6
45-54 Jahre 17.3
55-64 Jahre 13.7
65 Jahre und mehr 19.3
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Employed 64.8
Unemployed 1.5
Not in labor force 33.7
The Swiss federal Census asks for the highest achiedved education, not for the years of
schooling. Therefore they make an approximate calculation of the years of schooling.
15
Indications for population 15 years and older
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 182
A. Borkowski,
OFS)
Aucune formation achevée 0-8 0 Not completed primary education
Scolarité obligatoire 9 2 Lower secondary
Ecole de culture générale ou 12 3 Upper secondary
préparant à une formation
Apprentissage, école professionnelle 12 3
à plein temps
Maturité 13 3
Ecole normale 13 3
Formation professionnelle supérieure 14 4 Post secondary
Ecole professionnelle supérieure 14 5
Haute école spécialisée 16 5 First stage of tertiary
Université, haute école 19 5-6 First and second stage of tertiary
education
Sans indication No indication
Study title: Taiwan Social Change Survey: the Fourth Survey of the Fourth Cycle
Fieldwork dates: 08/10/2003~for about one month
Principal Chang, Ying-hwa
investigators: Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica
Sample type: Three-stage Stratified PPS Sampling
(1) PSU=township, (2) Li (administrative unit under township, (3)
respondent
Fieldwork institute: Center for Survey Research, Academia Sinica
Fieldwork methods Face-to-face interview
Sample size: 2016
SEX
Male 51.0%
Female 49.0%
AGE (groups)
Less than 14 19.8%
15˜64 70.9%
65 and more 9.2%
Unemployed 5.17%
Source no. 1: "Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book, R.O.C.," by the Ministry of Interior;
" Agricultural Statistics Yearbook," by Council of Agriculture, Executive
Yuan.
Source no. 2: "Taiwan-Fukien Demographic Fact Book, R.O.C.," by the Ministry of Interior.
Source no. 3: "Yearbook of Manpower Survey Statistics, Taiwan Area, R.O.C.," by
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan.
Uruguay
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 188
The design is stratif ied multistage. Two major regions are represented:
Montevideo Metropolitan Area (strata 1-7) and Urban population in the
rest of the Country (5000 or more inhabitants cities, strata 11-13).
In strata 11 to 13, four cities are selected per stratum via systematic pps
sampling. Size again being num ber of people residing on each city.
Census Zones, households and persons are selected in the sam e way as
in strata 1 to 7.
Sample allocation:
Table 1
Stratum Population Sample
1 224.396 96
2 367.513 156
3 428.118 184
4 286.499 120
5 78.576 32
6 191.474 80
7 21.368 12
11 349.935 144
12 325.190 144
13 317.427 140
Total 2.590.496 1.108
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 189
Language: Spanish
• DEMOGRAPHICS VARIABLES:
• UNION: The code 2 was not included.
• INCOME and RINCOME: In these questions, incomes were
measured in categories and we coded them.
• URBRURAL: It was not self assessement. Was coded by the
field supervisor.
04 'Independent Party'
05 'Liberal Party'
06 'Other Party'
96 'No party preference'
99 'NA'.
Publications:
Uruguay
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 193
AGE - Group
23,3 %
18 - 29
15,9 %
30 - 39
17,3 %
40 - 49
50 - 59 14,8 %
60 - 69 12,7 %
16,0 %
70 +
N 1.722.921
Note: The information is only about urban population in cities greater than 5.000 inhabitants.
USA
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Study Description
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 195
Language: English
Weighted: Yes
Weighting procedure: the weight takes into consideration three factors: 1) a sub-sampling of
temporray, non-response cases, 2) differential final non-response by area,
and 3) number of adults in the household to make representative of
individuals rather than households
Known systematic Men and resdients of large central cities ar eunderrepresented due to
properties of the higher nonresponse in the unweighted data
sample:
Deviations from ISSP None
questionnaire:
Publications: None
USA
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 197
Table 1
A Detailed Com parison of the 2002 Current Population Survey (CPS) and the W eighted and
Unweighted 2002 General Social Survey (GSS)
A. AGE
CPS GSS GSS
Unweighted Weighted*
18 – 24 13.7 9.9 12.1
25 – 29 8.6 9.3 9.7
30 – 34 10.1 11.2 10.4
35 – 39 11.3 10.2 9.8
40 – 44 12.0 9.7 10.0
45 – 49 10.5 10.1 10.4
50 – 54 8.5 9.0 9.4
55 – 59 6.4 6.8 6.8
60 – 64 4.9 6.0 5.9
65 + 14.1 17.7 15.6
N 2751 2751
B. Gender
Female 51.2 55.6 54.2
n 2765 2765
Sample type: The stratification variable used was the political and administrative
division consisting of 23 states. But 2 states ( Amazonas and Delta
Amacuro with lesser population) were joined together, so that there was
22 instead of 23 strata.
The sampling frame was the list of censal segments used to carry out the
XIII Venezuelan National Census. It included demographic and mapping
information prepared by the National Institute of Statistics (Instituto
Nacional de Estadística) for the 2001 census.
The sampling method was carried out in three satges. In the first stage
we selected censal segments from each stratum with proportional
probability to their number of dwellings
In the second stage were selected two "blocks" from each censal segment
using a systematic geographical order selection technique with a random
start. The selection of blocks was with probability proportional to the
number of dwellings in each block.
Finally a person was selected according to a quota by sex and age. Five
persons were selected from each block with one person selected from
each household. The start in each block to get the first dwelling was
random.
The quota was established using sex and age groups accordingly to the
national distribution of people by sex and age revealed in the 2001
National Census.
Fieldwork institute: Laboratorio de Ciencias Sociales, LACSO
Language: Spanish
Weighted: Yes
Weighting procedure: Post-stratification was carried out by standard of living groups (slg),
based on similar previous studies. Final sample weights were adjusted by
a factor obtained using the next equation: Fe = Expected % slg “e” /
observed % slg “e”
Known systematic The isolated indigenous population living in the Amazon (Yanomami,
properties of the Warao, etc) was excluded, but they represented less than 1% of total
sample: population.
There were limitations reaching people from High Class areas.
Deviations from ISSP None
questionnaire:
Publications: None
Venezuela
ISSP 2003 – National Identity II
Characteristics of National Population
ZA-No. 3910 I S S P 2003 National Identity II 202
not available