Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seismology
Seismology
Mathematical
Background
Lecture 02
Jan 16, 2023
• Strain is the ratio of change in dimension(s) caused by an applied stress to the original
dimension(s). Different constants of proportionality are used depending on the type
of stress applied.
• A homogeneous body is identical throughout. If a homogeneous body were divided into pieces, then every piece would be
chemically and physically identical, no matter how small the pieces.
• This, of course, cannot be realized in the rocks through which seismic waves propagate. Rocks are usually made of fragments
or interlocking crystals. If such rocks were cut into very small pieces, differences in pieces would be observed. Thus, rocks are
inhomogeneous—not homogenous.
• An isotropic medium has the same physical properties in all directions. Of particular concern are the propagation velocities of
the medium—the time rate at which seismic waves travel through the medium. In an anisotropic (not isotropic) medium,
propagation velocity does depend on direction of propagation. There are many types of anisotropy. One type, called
transverse isotropy, behaves as though it were composed of thin isotropic layers. As a result, there is a difference between
horizontal and vertical propagation velocities. Another type of anisotropy is found in rocks that have cracks running through
them. In such cases, the velocity parallel to the cracks differs from velocity orthogonal to the cracks.
• While P-waves can propagate in solids or fluids, S-waves can propagate in solids only.
• P-wave velocity is always faster than S-wave velocity.
• The other two solutions of the wave equation are called surface
waves. These are restricted to the surface of solid media. There are
two kinds of surface waves.
• Love wave propagation velocity is slightly slower than Rayleigh wave velocity. Love waves are not usually a
problem on exploration seismic records. However, if special energy sources are used to generate SH-waves, Love
waves can be a severe problem because of their high amplitudes.
• Much theoretical work in, or applicable to, seismic exploration is based on ray theory. Rays are simply lines (not
necessarily straight) that show the paths waves take between two points. A very important concept in ray theory is
Fermat’s Principle (Fig. 3–7). This principle can be stated many ways. In Sheriff’s Encyclopedic Dictionary of
Exploration Geophysics, the first statement is, “The seismic raypath between two points is that for which the first-
order variation of travel time with respect to all neighboring paths is zero.” Further on, Sheriff states, “If the
intervening media have different speeds, the path will not be straight but will be such that the overall traveltime is
minimized (usually).” The resulting raypath is also called the least time path or brachistochrone.
• Snell’s Law (Fig. 3–8) predicts the resulting ray paths for the
waves generated at the interface. In each of the four cases, a P-
wave is incident on the interface at an angle 0—the angle
between the ray and perpendicular to the boundary. P- and S-
wave velocities in layer 1 are VP1 and VS1, respectively. P- and S-
wave velocities in layer 2 are VP2 and VS2, respectively.
Mohit Agrawal (Seismic Data Acquisition) 10
• In Figure 3–8a, the P-wave and S-wave velocities in the second layer are faster than the P-wave velocity in the first
layer. Consequently, the transmitted P- and SV-waves are bent, or refracted, at angles greater than the incident
angle. That is, they are bent toward the horizontal. In the first layer, the angle of reflection for the P-wave equals the
incident angle, but the angle of reflection for the reflected SV-wave is smaller. This is because the S-wave velocity is
slower than the P-wave velocity. The refraction angle of the SV-wave in the second layer is also smaller than that of
the refracted P-wave.
• In Figure 3–8b, the P-wave velocity in the second layer is still the fastest but the S-wave velocity in the second layer
is slower than the P-wave velocity in the first layer. Thus, the angle of refraction for the SV-wave is now smaller than
the angle of incidence.
• In Figure 3–8c, the P-wave velocity in the first layer is faster than the P-wave velocity in the second layer so the
angle of refraction for the P-wave is less than the angle of incidence—bent toward the vertical). Since the S-wave
velocity in layer 2 is faster than the S-wave velocity in layer 1, the angle of refraction for the SV-wave is greater than
the angle of reflection for the SV-wave.
• In Figure 3–8d, the P-wave velocity in the first layer is faster than the P-wave velocity in the second layer and the S
wave velocity in the first layer is also faster than the S-wave velocity in the second layer. As a result, the angle of
refraction for the Pwave is less than the angle of incidence, and the angle of refraction for the SV-wave is less than
the angle of reflection for the SV-wave.
Generalizing from the first, fourth, and fifth terms, the Law of Refraction can be written as sin2 = V2 V1 sin 1, where 2 is
the angle of refraction, V2 is velocity in the lower layer for the refracted wave, 1 is the angle of incidence, and V1 is
velocity in the upper layer for the incident wave.
• The second exception is when the angle of incidence exceeds the critical angle. The critical angle is the angle of
incidence at which the angle of refraction is 90°. Actually, there are two critical angles, one for P-waves and one
for S-waves. In the first case:
From the ray theory point of view, a critically refracted wave travels along the interface between layers and is
refracted back into the upper layer at the critical angle, as shown in Figure 3–9. The waves refracted back into
the upper layer are called head waves or sometimes first-break refractions because at certain distances from a
source they are the first-arriving energy.
3. A wave front can be defined as the locus of all points reached at the same time by a wave.
4. It turns out that rays intersect wavefronts at right angles. Figure 3–10 illustrates the relationship between
wavefronts and rays.
Since a constant velocity is assumed, the direct and reflected wavefronts are spherical. The refracted wavefront,
however, is not spherical because it does not come from a single point. The figure also shows that the head wave
energy does not penetrate the lower layer. Its wavefront, which has the shape of a truncated cone, results from a
coupling between the reflected and refracted wavefronts.