FP3

Table 3. Changes in Wound Size

Fixed and Random Effects

  Q df p
Omnibus test of Model Coefficients 24.551 1 < .001
Test of Residual Heterogeneity 1.991 3 0.004
Note.  p -values are approximate.
Note.  The model was estimated using Fixed Effects method.

Coefficients
95% Confidence Interval
  Estimate Standard Error z p Lower Upper
intercept 14.535 2.934 4.955 < .001 8.786 20.285
Note.  Wald test.

Table 3 provides information on the changes in wound size, specifically focusing on the fixed and

random effects. The table includes several statistical measures and coefficients to assess the model's

performance.

The "Omnibus test of Model Coefficients" shows a significant result with a test statistic of 24.551

and a p-value of less than 0.001. This indicates that the overall model coefficients are statistically

significant. The "Test of Residual Heterogeneity" examines the variability within the model. The test

statistic is 1.991 with a p-value of 0.004, suggesting that there is some residual heterogeneity present in

the model. Moving on to the "Coefficients" section, the table presents the estimates and corresponding

statistical values for each coefficient. The "intercept" coefficient has an estimated value of 14.535 with a

standard error of 2.934. The z-value of 4.955 indicates that the coefficient is significantly different from

zero. The p-value is again less than 0.001, further confirming the statistical significance of the intercept.

The 95% confidence interval for the coefficient ranges from 8.786 to 20.285.
Table 2. Changes in Wound Size

Fixed and Random Effects

  Q df p
Omnibus test of Model Coefficients 50.492 1 < .001
Test of Residual Heterogeneity 1.775 3 0.620
Note.  p -values are approximate.
Note.  The model was estimated using Fixed Effects method.

Coefficients
95% Confidence Interval
  Estimate Standard Error z p Lower Upper
intercept 20.020 2.817 7.106 < .001 14.498 25.542
Note.  Wald test.

Table 2 provides information on the changes in wound size, specifically focusing on the fixed and

random effects. The table includes various statistical measures and coefficients to assess the model's

performance.

The "Omnibus test of Model Coefficients" shows a significant result with a test statistic of 50.492

and a p-value of less than 0.001. This suggests that the overall model coefficients are statistically

significant. The "Test of Residual Heterogeneity" examines the variability within the model. The test

statistic is 1.775 with a p-value of 0.620, indicating that there is no significant residual heterogeneity

present in the model. Moving on to the "Coefficients" section, the table presents the estimates and

corresponding statistical values for each coefficient. The "intercept" coefficient has an estimated value

of 20.020 with a standard error of 2.817. The z-value of 7.106 indicates that the coefficient is

significantly different from zero. The p-value is again less than 0.001, further confirming the statistical

significance of the intercept. The 95% confidence interval for the coefficient ranges from 14.498 to

25.542.
Table 4. Fibroblast Proliferation

Fixed and Random Effects

  Q df p
Omnibus test of Model Coefficients 33.647 1 < .001
Test of Residual Heterogeneity 302.952 6 < .001
Note.  p -values are approximate.
Note.  The model was estimated using Fixed Effects method.

Coefficients
95% Confidence Interval
  Estimate Standard Error z p Lower Upper
intercept 31.408 5.415 5.801 < .001 20.796 42.021
Note.  Wald test.

Table 4 provides information on fibroblast proliferation, focusing on the fixed and random effects. The table
includes statistical measures and coefficients to evaluate the model's performance.

The "Omnibus test of Model Coefficients" shows a significant result with a test statistic of 33.647 and a p-value of
less than 0.001. This suggests that the overall model coefficients are statistically significant. The "Test of Residual
Heterogeneity" examines the variability within the model. The test statistic is 302.952 with a p-value of less than
0.001, indicating that there is a significant amount of residual heterogeneity present in the model. Moving on to the
"Coefficients" section, the table presents the estimates and corresponding statistical values for each coefficient. The
"intercept" coefficient has an estimated value of 31.408 with a standard error of 5.415. The z-value of 5.801
indicates that the coefficient is significantly different from zero. The p-value is again less than 0.001, further
confirming the statistical significance of the intercept. The 95% confidence interval for the coefficient ranges from
20.796 to 42.021
Forest Plot
Table 5. Fibroblast Proliferation

Fixed and Random Effects

  Q df p
Omnibus test of Model Coefficients 1670.914 1 < .001
Test of Residual Heterogeneity 306.750 6 < .001
Note.  p -values are approximate.
Note.  The model was estimated using Fixed Effects method.

Coefficients
95% Confidence Interval
Estimat
  Standard Error z p Lower Upper
e
intercep 40.87
13.006 0.318 < .001 12.382 13.630
t 7
Note.  Wald test.

Table 5 presents information on fibroblast proliferation, focusing on the fixed and random effects. The

table includes statistical measures and coefficients to assess the model's performance.

The "Omnibus test of Model Coefficients" shows a highly significant result with a test statistic of

1670.914 and a p-value of less than 0.001. This indicates that the overall model coefficients are

statistically significant. The "Test of Residual Heterogeneity" examines the variability within the model.

The test statistic is 306.750 with a p-value of less than 0.001, suggesting a significant amount of residual

heterogeneity present in the model. Moving on to the "Coefficients" section, the table provides

estimates and corresponding statistical values for each coefficient. The "intercept" coefficient has an

estimated value of 13.006 with a standard error of 0.318. The z-value of 40.877 indicates that the

coefficient is significantly different from zero. The p-value is less than 0.001, further confirming the
statistical significance of the intercept. The 95% confidence interval for the coefficient ranges from

12.382 to 13.630.