Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investment Thesis Converge Technology Solutions
Investment Thesis Converge Technology Solutions
In 2017, the company made 52 million Canadian dollars, and by 2021, it earned 1527 million
Canadian dollars, showing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 132% and 49% over the
previous three years.
The company's EBITDA in 2017 was -210 CAD, with 2018 being the first year that it became
profitable, with an EBITDA of 15.78 million CAD, and 2021 is the same, with a CAGR of
275% and 57% in the last three years.
In 2019, the EBITDA to FCF conversion rate was 42%, whereas it will be 66% in 2021. The
EBITDA growth rate over the last three years has been 79%. This is because each year becomes
more profitable, as the denominator increases due to the significant increase in EBITDA, and
the denominator decreases as it has to pay less interest and the CAPEX remains low in
comparison to sales, so this percentage will increase until it is approximately 80%, which is
more or less the average in this type of company.
GROWTH STRATEGY
The company's growth through acquisitions is approximately 25-30% of its annual revenues,
representing a significant portion of those revenues.
CTS's core objective is to acquire smaller regional IT providers, increase their margins through
cost savings, and boost client retention through product and service cross-selling. Converge has
purchased approximately 30 firms since its founding, with 9 completed in 2021 alone.
The company's acquisition strategy is to buy companies that generate more than $100 million in
revenue and have a minimum EBITDA margin of 3%, paying around x5 EBITDA, which
means making acquisitions for less than $15 million and increasing the margin to 6.5% once the
acquired company has fully integrated into the group and found synergies.
DIVISIONS
As can be seen, the company operates in a sector with strong future perspectives due to
technological advancements in recent years, and there are still many years of business
development and modernization ahead of it, so the company can expect organic growth if it
continues to implement its policies as it has done so far because the sector is growing rapidly by
itself.
The company has grown by 49% in earnings or revenues over the last three years,
demonstrating a superior growth rate in comparison to the sectors in which it operates,
indicating that the company is executing its policies well by growing faster than its sector and
its competitors.
MOAT
-Change costs. Once the company obtains a new client, it installs its information system,
manages all system updates, and performs security maintenance with its cybersecurity division.
It is difficult for the client to refuse their services because they are extensive, and the cost of
finding a new provider, halting production for a few days, adapting to the new systems, and
reorganizing the workforce is prohibitively expensive.
As a result of all of this, the client's average time spent with the company is 10 years, which
includes the recurring revenue that the company earns each time a new client is gained.
-Pricing power. The competitive advantage described above allows the company to set the price
to pay for its services, as well as the ability to increase these charges year after year or every
certain period, because, as previously stated, changing service providers is much more
expensive than paying a small percentage extra every certain period to maintain the services
provided by CTS
-High Quantity. As the company gains new customers, the price it pays AWS or Google for
using its cloud infrastructure will become more affordable, as it will earn more money and reap
more benefits from the investment it makes to expand its operations, increasing the profit
margins and making the company more profitable.
- Low-cost product, but customer-critical. It is important to remember that today, whether the
firm is large or little, everything is controlled by information technology. This involves the use
of software to retain business control, as well as a particular level of security to ensure that your
data is not stolen or lost.
MANAGEMENT
One of the key elements in this thesis that give me a lot of faith in the organization is the
leadership team. Shaun Main, the business's co-founder, and current CEO has substantial
expertise in the IT services market, having previously held key positions at Pivot Technology
Solutions, a Canadian company that also specializes in IT services and was acquired by
Computacenter in 2020.
Shaun has worked hard to build and execute his strategic acquisitions plan with Converge, and
he hasn't changed anything since 2017 since he understands what he's doing and believes in his
strategy, which has yielded extremely positive results so far.
-That the corporation starts making acquisitions that don't deliver the same value or synergies as
previously, resulting in a decrease in benefits.
-To provide services to consumers, the company relies on third-party cloud infrastructure
providers such as Amazon (AWS) and Google (Google Cloud). This suggests that CTS has
contracts with these companies under which they pay X amount of money to use their storage
facilities; thus, an increase in costs or a significant change in contractual conditions could
jeopardize the company's sustainability.
- Because CTS's subsidiary companies are unable of adjusting to frequent technical changes as
well as new client requests and needs, the corporation must seek out new service providers.
-That the corporation continues to issue too many shares to raise funds for future expansion,
diluting the shareholders, even though the number of shares in circulation has nearly quadrupled
in a year.
-That the company is offered a takeover bid, and as a result the upside that it can have over time
is severely constrained, even though this may suggest making money rapidly and without
danger, but in much lesser amounts.
VALUATION
As we can see, converge has increased its earnings by 50%, with a 61% increase in 2021 over
2020, and a 20% increase in organic growth, implying a 15% increase in the next years. This
would be equivalent to pursuing organic growth while ignoring acquisitions.
Also, I intend to increase margin EBITDA by 12% by 2027, even if, as previously stated, a 15-
18% increase is feasible, but I like to be more conservative. Furthermore, we will pay 15x
EV/EBITDA, which is lower than the industry average.
Penalize stock dilution; contemplate a 10% annual penalty, albeit it might be considerably lower
because they already have more than $400 million in cash and a $300 million credit line
available for acquisitions without the need to issue stock.
Taking all of this into account, I estimate that they will be generating around $550M in
EBITDA in 2027, which multiplied by the previously mentioned 15x will result in a Market
Cap of $8.2B; if we add a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio of 1, we would be looking at an Enterprise
Value of $8.7B. This equates to a price per share of CAD 30.58, which would quintupli the
investment in five years at current prices of CAD 6,10, or a 23-24% annual return.
The reason to be so undervalued is that the market for small size Canadians is less visible, and
market inefficiencies are more severe, as it typically takes months or years for the market to
recognize a company's full value, which is not as common in a more scrutinized market like the
United States.
As previously stated, the gross margin and EBITDA are constrained by the acquisitions and
promotions that must be made to achieve sales because they are still a small competitor. Future
margins are likely to be between 33-35% for gross margins and 15-18% for EBITDA margins,
which is the industry average for companies with many more years on the market.
As we can see, CTS is trading at a considerably lower multiple than peers like Epam, Endava,
Cognizant or Perficent, even though it is the one that is growing the most in terms of sales and
FCF and has one of the best balance sheets.
According to the estimate, which I insist on, it is conservative in terms of the company's recent
earnings growth and the guidance provided for 2025, as well as the multiple to apply in the
valuation, which is lower than what the comparables are estimating, with a target price for 2025
of around 30-35 euros, implying an x5 or x6 chance of meeting these expectations.
If the company's guidance is met and it achieves 500 million euros in EBITDA for 2025 and a
valuation multiple of x15, it will result in a target price of 30 euros for 2025, multiplying our
initial investment by more than six times over four years.