Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 75
Module 75
Avril Genao
Check Your Understanding
1. Some opponents of tradable emissions permits object to them on the
1
grounds that polluters that sell their permits benefit monetarily from their
involvement in polluting the environment. Assess this argument.
This argument is wrong and misconcieved. Why? Well if a polluter
wants to sell the firm, it has to reduce emissions. So although they make
money from selling the permit, it can only be if they reduce contamination
and their amount of pollution
- Water-saving toilets reduce the need to pump water from rivers and
aquifers. The cost of a gallon of water to homeowners is virtually zero: The
marginal social benefit is larger than the marginal social cost since its
almost zero for homeowners to replace the toilet yet the environmental
response is much better. An appropriate policy response would be to
create a pigouvian subsidy for the installment of these new toilets to bring
marginal private benefit to these homeowners
2. The use of plastic water bottles creates external costs as the result of
plastic production, bottle transportation, litter, and waste disposal. Draw a
correctly labeled graph showing how the market will determine the
quantity of water bottles purchased. On the same graph, show the
marginal external cost, the socially optimal quantity of water bottles, and
the size of a Pigouvian tax that could be used to achieve the socially
optimal quantity of water bottles.