Joberg on RPF:

Tech was "supposed" to serve us! We know, by now, that we've become slaves of that
tech in the name of "convenience":rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
The Utopia was this one: (Elysium)
S0XQK8I3Gw1Iwn6wHaFf?w=216&h=180&c=7&r=0&o=5&pid=1.jpg

^^
That's the world they're trying to sell you. The personal AI assistant/robot. You
don't have to work anymore because, according to them, tech will be so
sophisticated that all of the jobs/services will be done, automatically, by
machines:eek::eek::oops::oops:

It's a class war (not a race/gender war). People don't understand how complex is a
society. If almost everyone is not working who's going to pay for...let's say
pensions; just to name one?

AI will have difficulty replacing 3 types of jobs: agriculture, mining and

manufacturing. We've seen the Apple/Google food store where you have minimum staff
(cleaners and shelve fillers) for now, since those could be replaced easily by
automation.
Robot surgeons are as capable of operating on a patient as a real surgeon...and, it
seems, that AI is better at interpreting Xray (cancerous growth or others) than a
human.

But, the main thing that they are not telling you is that AI will be the ultimate
surveillance/information tool of them all!!
From facial/voice recognition to looking into your body language and other things
that Sci-Fi is made off.

Look at WADU at JPMorgan (numerous articles on the Web), here's an "Hors-d'

oeuvre":

"In spring 2020, JPMorgan Chase, America’s biggest bank, rolled out its proprietary
Workforce Activity Data Utility (WADU), which collects data about its employees.
Workers complain that management is using WADU to maintain “lists” that track their
behavior – such as missing work – but the bank claims such systems are necessary
for compliance with US Security and Exchange Commission rules and other banking
regulations. Reed Alexander reports for Business Insider UK that WADU has driven
employees to try to avoid being monitored, but that cuts into their productivity.
This case history – though based on only a few interviews and leaked documents –
probes the question: What happens when a company’s surveillance policies challenge
its employees’ personal boundaries?"

And: "What happens when an entity's surveillance policies challenge its

population's personal boundaries? (that I will not name).