Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012 May
2012 May
2012 May
Note: You should always give precise and adequate explanations to support your
conclusions. Clarity of presentation of your argument counts. So think carefully
before you write.
1. (9 points)
Let A E M(n,n;lF). Prove that there exists some k 0 E {l, ... ,n} such that
rank(Ako+l) = rank(Ak0 ). Furthermore, for every positive integer m ;::: k 0 , we
have rank(Am) = rank(Ak0 ).
2. (5 points)
Let A E M(n, n; JF). Starting from the definition of the determinant, prove that
det(A) = det(Ar).
(Hint: You may want to use the fact that sgn(a) = sgn(a- 1 ) for every permu-
tation a.)
3. (4 points)
Give an example for A E M(n, n; JR) satisfying AAT =AT A but not diagonal-
izable over JR.
4. (6 points)
6. (14 points)
1
LetA=J2
(Vs~
(a) Show that the singular values of A are 1 and 2.
(b) Find a singular value decomposition for A and the Moore-Penrose pseu-
doinverse of A.
(c) Find the orthogonal projection map on the subspace R(A) C lR 3 with
respect to the Euclidean inner product.
7. (16 points)
Let C[O, 21r] be the set of complex-valued continuous functions on [0, 21r]. It
2"
is given that (f, g) =
10
f(t)g(t)dt, where J, g
product on C[O, 21r]. Consider the subspace
E C[O, 21r], defines an inner
8. (12 points)
(b) Hence or otherwise, show that for any A, B E M (m, n; IC), if A* B = 0 and
AB* = 0, then (A+ B)+ = A+ + B+
2
9. (12 points)
(c) Let v be a common eigenvector of A and B. Prove that vj_ (with respect
to the Euclidean inner product) is an invariant subspace of both A and B.
(d) Using the above results or otherwise, prove that A and B can be si-
multaneously unitarily diagonalized, i.e. there exists a unitary matrix
U E M(n, n; iC) such that both U* AU and U* BU are diagonal.
* * * * * * * End of Paper * * * * * * *