2021 Child Friendly Local Governance Audit

Notes for Accomplishing the Data Capture Form (DCF)

City/Municipal IMTF to accomplish CFLGA Forms 1-A to 1-E. The score/rating is
automatically generated
Encode or fill-in in CFLGA
the required Form
data in the 1.
cells/fields highlighted in yellow.
1 Otherwise, tickfor
thethe
appropriate
Computations indicatorsbox/selection.
are automatically generated in the cells/fields
2 highlighted
Worksheetsinare green; said items
formatted arethe
to print locked
Dataand cannotForm
Capture be edited.
(DCF) only; this excludes
3 the the
rating guidelineinwhich areForm
the cells/fields highlighted in grey.
For signatories CFLGA 1, kindly indicate office/s and corresponding
4 representative/s of additonal IMTF members, if any.
5
Include all suporting documents or means of verifications (MOVs) for the indicators
Note: in the submission.
CFLGA Form 1-A: Right of Children to Survival (15%)
LGU:

1.1. Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children (FIC) aged 12 months old Accomplishment (%) Point
Actual Data Projected Data Score FIC 95-100% 5.00
Number of fully immunized children #DIV/0! 90-94% 4.00
Total population of 12 months old 85-89% 3.00
Percentage Coverage #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 80-84% 2.00
Insufficient supply due to logistical concern below 80% 1.00
No data below 80% 1.00
Data Source: FHSIS from the Local Health Office

1.2. Prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-59 months old

Actual Data Projected Data Score Accomplishment (%) Point
Actual number of 0-59 months weighed #DIV/0! OPT Plus 80-110% 1.00
Coverage
Total Population of 0-59 months old below 80% 0.00
OPT Plus Coverage (0-59 months) #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
No data

If OPT Plus coverage is at least 80%, proceed to the following section: Accomplishment (%) Point
Nutritional Status Actual Data Prevalence Score Status Less than Point
a. Stunted #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Stunting 14.39% 2.00
1.00
b. Wasted #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Wasting 4.40% 1.50
c. Overweight and Obese #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Overweight 3.50% 0.50
Data Source: Operation Timbang (OPT) Plus, Local Nutrition Office

1.3. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with prenatal and postpartum
services

Total Population of 10-19 years old (female adolescents)

Total Number of Pregnant Adolescents
Prevalence of Adolecent Pregnancies #DIV/0!

1.3.1 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents with prenatal services

Prenatal visits Adolescents with
Number of at least 4 Coverage Accomplishment (%) Point
(at least 4) Pregnant prenatal visits Score
Adolescents Prenatal 80-100% 3.00
10-14 years old 0 0 #DIV/0! 70-79.99% 2.00
15-19 years old 60-69.99% 1.00
Total 0 0 #DIV/0! below 60% 0.00
No reported pregnant adolescent
No data
Note: For 2019, if the available data is consolidated for 10-19 years old only, encode in the
space for the 15-19 years old data then leave a note in the Remarks section.
Data Source: Safe Motherhood Program - Pregnancy Tracking, Local Health Office
1.3.2 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents with postpartum services
Postpartum visits No. of Pregnant Adolescents with
at least 2 Coverage
(at least 2) Adolescents who postpartum visits
Score
gave birth Accomplishment (%) Point
10-14 years old 0 0 #DIV/0! Postpartum 80-100% 2.00
15-19 years old 70-79.99% 1.00
Total 0 0 #DIV/0! below 70% 0.00
No reported livebirth among adolescents
No data

CFLGA Form 1-A Survival | Page 2

 Note: For 2019, if the available data is consolidated for 10-19 years old only, encode in the
space for the 15-19 years old data then leave a note in the Remarks section.
Data Source: Safe Motherhood Program - Pregnancy Tracking, Local Health Office

Remarks:

CFLGA Form 1-A Survival | Page 3

CFLGA Form 1-B: Right of Children to Development (15%)
LGU:
000………

2.1. Percentage coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided with early childhood care and development
(ECCD) services, both public and privately managed, and may be facility, home, or community-based

Number of % from total

Enrollees enrollees
a. Public Centers (i.e. Day Care, Child Development) #DIV/0!
b. Private Centers (i.e. Montessori) #DIV/0!
c. Community-Based (i.e. SNPs, mobile learning) 0 #DIV/0! Accomplishment (%) Point
d. Other modalities implemented by the LGU, please specify: 100% 5.00
0 #DIV/0! 95-99.99% 4.00
0 #DIV/0! 90-94.99% 3.00
No children aged 3-4 years old 85-89.99% 2.00
No data Score 80-84.99% 1.00
Total Number of ECCD Enrollees 0 #DIV/0! below 80% 0.00
Total Population of 3-4 years old #DIV/0!
Data Source: Enrolment/Registration List, LSWDO / ECCD Focal Person

2.2.
Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either private or publicly-managed, in any of the following
modality - center/facility, home, community, or other modalities
Accomplishment (%) Point
2.2.1. Percentage of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD service Percentage Score Barangays 100% 2.00
with at
Number of barangays with at least 1 ECCD service #DIV/0! least 1 95-99.99% 1.50
ECCD
Total Number of barangays #DIV/0! service 90-94.99% 1.00
No data 85-89.99% 0.50
below 85% 0.00
2.2.2. Percentage of accredited or recognized center-based ECCD services Percentage Score
Score
a. Number of accredited/recognized Public Centers #DIV/0! Accomplishment (%) Point
b. Total number of Public Centers #DIV/0! Accredited/ 100% 3.00
Percentage of accredited/recognized centers Recognized 90-99.99% 2.50
No data 80-89.99% 2.00
Note: For 2019, only the accreditation/recognition for public centers is required. 70-79.99% 1.50
60.-69.99% 1.00
ECCD Services available (please fill-out) 50-59.99% 0.50
Private Centers (i.e. Montessori) Other modalities, please specify: below 50% 0.00
Number of Recognized Private Centers
Community-Based (i.e. SNPs, mobile learning) 0
Early Stimulation (for 0-2 years old) 0
Data Source: LSWDO / ECCD Focal Person

2.3. Percentage of out-of-school children and youth assisted for enrolment/re-enrolment to school,
alternative learning system or other flexible learning options

Accomplishment (%) Point

2.3.1.
Percentage of children who have dropped out from school that were reintegrated in the academic year
being audited 90-100% 2.50
a. Total number of school dropouts reintegrated in formal school 1 Score 80-89.99% 2.00
b. Total number of school dropouts aged 5-17 years old #DIV/0! 70-79.99% 1.50
No data 60-69.99% 1.00
Percentage of school dropouts re-enrolled #DIV/0! 50-59.99% 0.50
Data Source: Simple Dropout Rate from Elementary and Secondary Schools below 50% 0.00

2.3.2. Percentage of OSCY registered/enrolled to schools, ALS, or other flexible learning options
Total number of OSCY aged 5-17 years old Rate of OSCY
Total population of children aged 5-17 years old #DIV/0!

a. Number of OSCY enrolled in Elementary/Secondary School 0

b. Number of OSCY enrolled in Alternative Learning System (ALS) Accomplishment (%) Point
c. Number of OSCY enrolled to other modalities/flexible learning options, please specify: 90-100% 2.50
80-89.99% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.50
No data Score 60-69.99% 1.00
Total Number of 5-17 years old OSCY assisted for enrollment 0 #DIV/0! 50-59.99% 0.50
#DIV/0! below 50% 0.00
Data Source: LSWDO / Local Youth Development Office

Remarks:

CFLGA Form 1-B Development | Page 4

CFLGA Form 1-C: Right of Children to Protection (15%)
LGU:
###
3.1. Management of reported cases of children in need of special protection (CNSP)

3.1.1 Percentage coverage of Case Management Coverage Score Accomplishment (%) Point
Total number of Cases Managed #DIV/0! Coverage 100% 5.00
Total number of reported CNSP cases #DIV/0! 90-99.99% 4.00
No reported CNSP case 80-89.99% 3.00
No data 70-79.99% 2.00
60-69.99% 1.00
3.1.2. Case management preparation below 60% 0.00
Prepared and signed by a trained registered social worker Score
Prepared and signed by a registered social worker 7.00 Accomplishment (%) Point
Prepared and signed by a trained public social development worker Preparation RSW 7.00
Trained SW 4.00
3.1.3. Established referral network Score Trained Staff 2.00
With established referral network 3.00
Data Source: LSWDO

Report Acceptors (check as applicable, for reference only) Accomplishment (%) Point
LSWDO City/Municipal LCPC Referral all or nothing 3.00
WCPD/WCPU BCPC
School CPC VAWC Desk
Others, please specify:

Remarks:

###

CFLGA Form 1-C Protection | Page 5

CFLGA Form 1-D: Right of Children to Participation (15%)
LGU:

4.1. Child representation in the Local Council for the Protection of Children

4.1.1. Child Representative in the City/Municipality CPC Score Accomplishment (%) Point
Executive Order 1.00 with Child Rep 1.00

4.1.2. Child Representative Selection Process at the City/Municipal level Score Child Rep Selection
Thru Children's General Assembly 2.00 General Assembly 4.00
Appointed/Designated Appointed/Designat 2.00

4.1.3. Child Representative in the Barangay CPC Score Child Rep in BCPCs
Total Number of BCPCs with Child Representative #DIV/0! 90-100% 3.00
Total Number of barangays 80-89.99% 2.00
Percentage of Barangays with Child Representative #DIV/0! 70-79.99% 1.00
Data Source: LCPC Secretariat below 70% 0.00

4.2.
Development of program, project, activity (PPA) or policy with children's participation in the
planning, implementation or monitoring phase
Core PPA / Plan / Policy Specific Activity Conducted Score In terms of Quantity
Crafting of Children's Sectoral Plan (quantity) 5 or more PPAs 3.00
National Children's Month Celebration 3.00 3-4 PPAs 2.00
Other PPA / Plan / Policy: at least 2 1.00
Total 6
###
###
###
###
Note: Tick box for each item

Specific role/involvement of Number of Score

children in the activity: Activity/ies (quality) In terms of Quality
Child-led Advocacy #DIV/0! Child-led Advocacy 4.00
Planning Planning 3.00
Monitoring 0 Monitoring 2.00
Attendance Attendance 1.00
Data Source: LCPC Secretariat

Remarks:

CFLGA Form 1-D Participation | Page 6

CFLGA Form 1-E: Governance (40%)
LGU:

###
5.1. Database on children

5.5.1. Established and updated database on children Score Accomplishment (%) Point
With all of the following disaggregated information on children: 5.00 (all or nothing score)
with established and
Age Ethnicity School Status (in/out) updated database 5.00
Sex Disability No data

5.5.2. Annual Local State of Children Report Score

Report delivered/presented during National Children's Month Celebration 2.00 Reported LSCR 2.00
Data Source: Local Planning and Development Office / LSWDO

5.2. Available and implemented Local Plans for Children

Local Development Plan or Local Action Plan for Children Score Accomplishment Point
Comprehensive Local Juvenile Intervention Program (CLJIP) 2.00 per plan 2.00
Integration of the Comprehensive Emergency Program for Children in
X the LDRRM Plan and budget
Data Source: Local Planning and Development Office / LSWDO

5.3. Updated Local Code for Children adopting recently issued national laws on children Accomplishment Point
Early Years Act (RA 10410) Score LCC + 4 and above 5.00
Children’s Safety on Motorcycles Act (RA 10666) 5.00 LCC + 3 ordinances 4.00
Children’s Emergency Relief and Protection Act (RA 10821) LCC + 2 ordinances 3.00
National Mental Health Policy (RA 11036) LCC + 1 ordinance 2.00
Masustansyang Pagkain para sa Batang Pilipino (RA 11037) w/ ordinance/s only 1.00
Kalusugan at Nutrisyon ng Magnanay Act (F1KD, RA 11148)
Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act (RA 9231)
Special Protection of Children in Situations of Armed Conflict Act (RA 11188)
Data Source: Sangguniang Bayan / Panlungsod

5.4. Budget allocated and utilized for children's PPAs

5.4.1. Approved Local Investment Program for Children or Annual Work and Financial Accomplishment (%) Point
Plan for Children (AWFPC) Score
Resolution 2.00 Allocation
10% above 4.00
5.4.2. Budget allocation for children's PPAs Allocation Rate 7-9.99% 3.00
LGU's Total Budget P - 4-6.99% 2.00
Internal Revenue Allotment Score 1-3.99% 1.00
Revenue from local sources #DIV/0! below 1% 0.00
Budget Allocated for Children's PPAs #DIV/0!
Utilization
5.4.3. Utilization of budget for children's PPAs Utilization Rate Score 100% 4.00

X Budget utilized for children's PPAs #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 90-99.99% 3.00

80-89.99% 2.00
(please fill out) 70-79.99% 1.00
Revenue from Real Property Tax Collection below 70% 0.00
Budget allocated for the Special Education Fund #DIV/0! below 70% 0.00
Budget utilized for the Special Education Fund #DIV/0! below 70% 0.00
Data Source: LSWDO / Budget Office / Accounting Office

5.5. Functional LCPCs

C/M LCPC Functionality Point
5.5.1. Functional City/Municipal LCPC Score Ideal 3.00
Ideal Mature Progressive Basic 3.00 Mature 2.00

5.5.2. Functional Barangay LCPCs Percentage Score

Total Number of Barangays #DIV/0! BCPC weighted value
Barangays with Ideal Functionality #DIV/0! Ideal 5.00

X Barangays with Mature Functionality #DIV/0! Mature 3.00

Barangays with Progressive Functionality #DIV/0! Progressive/Basic 0.00
Barangays with Basic Functionality #DIV/0!
Data Source: LCPC Functionality Assessment Report, DILG City/Municipal Field Office

5.6. Child-Friendly Facilities in all Barangays Score Accomplishment (%) Point

Designated Play / Recreational Area 100% 2.00
No. of Brgys. with play/recreational area #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Library/ Reading Center
X No. of Brgys. with library/reading center #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Data Source: Monitoring Report - Brgy. Facilities and Workers, DILG City/Municipal Field Office ###

Remarks:

CFLGA Form 1-E Governance | Page 7

 CHILD FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT
City/Municipality:
Province: Agusan del Norte
Date Accomplished:

Audit Summary

Survival #DIV/0!
1.1. Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children (FIC) aged 12 months old #DIV/0!
1.2. Prevalence
Percentage of malnutrition
coverage amongadolescents
of pregnant children aged 0-59 months
provided old
with prenatal and #DIV/0!
1.3. postpartum services
1.3.1. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents with prenatal services #DIV/0!
1.3.2. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents with postpartum services #DIV/0!
Development #DIV/0!
2.1. Percentage coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided with early
childhood care and development (ECCD) services, both public and privately 5.00
managed, and may be facility, home, or community-based
2.2. Presence of ECCD services in all barangays
2.2.1. Percentage of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD service #DIV/0!
2.2.2. Percentage of accredited or recognized center-based ECCD services #DIV/0!
2.3. Percentage of OSCY assisted for enrolment/re-enrolment to school, ALS or
other flexible learning options.
2.3.1. Percentage of children who have dropped out from school that were
reintegrated in the academic year being audited 2.50
2.3.2. Percentage of OSCY registered/enrolled to schools, ALS, or other flexible
learning options 2.50
Protection 15.00
3.1. Management of reported cases of children in need of special protection
3.1.1. (CNSP)
Percentage coverage of Case Management 5.00
3.1.2. Case management preparation 7.00
3.1.3. Established referral network 3.00
Participation 13.71
4.1. Child representation in the Local Council for the Protection of Children
4.1.1. Child Representative in the City/Municipality CPC 1.00
4.1.2. Child Representative Selection Process at the City/Municipal level 4.00
4.1.3. Child Representative in the Barangay CPC 3.00
4.2. Development of program, project, activity (PPA) or policy with children's
5.71
participation in the planning, implementation or monitoring phase
Governance #DIV/0!
5.1. Database on children
5.1.1. Established and updated database on children -
5.1.2. Annual Local State of Children Report -
5.2. Available and implemented Local Plans for Children -
5.3. Updated LCC adopting recently issued national laws on children -
5.4. Budget allocated and utilized for children's PPAs
5.4.1. Approved Local Investment Program for Children or Annual Work and -
Financial
5.4.2. Budget allocation for children's PPAs #DIV/0!
 5.4.3. Utilization of budget for children's PPAs #DIV/0!
5.5. Functional LCPCs
5.5.1 Functional City/Municipal LCPC -
5.5.2 Functional Barangay LCPCs #DIV/0!
5.6. Child-Friendly Facilities in all Barangays #DIV/0!
TOTAL #DIV/0!

Prepared by the City/Municipal Inter-Agency Monitoring Task Force

Composition Name Position/Designation Signature

Chairperson

Vice-Chairperson
Members:
Planning and Development
Office
Health and Nutrition Office

Department of Education /
Academe
Nongovernment or Interfaith
Oganization

Noted by:

Hon.
Mayor
 CHILD FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT
Province: _______________
C.Y.: _______________

Provincial Audit Summary

Categories
City/Municipality Survival Development Protection Participation Governance Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

Average Rating
Prepared by the Provincial Inter-Agency Monitoring Task Force

Composition Name Position/Designation Signature

Chairperson

Vice-Chairperson

Members:
Planning and
Development Office
Health and Nutrition
Office
Department of
Education
Academe

Nongovernment or
Interfaith Oganization

Noted by:

Hon.
Governor
 CHILD FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT
Region: _______________
C.Y.: _______________

Regional Audit Summary

Province City/Municipality Rating

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Average Rating

Prepared by the Regional Inter-Agency Monitoring Task Force

 Composition Name Position / Signature
Designation
Chairperson

Vice-Chairperson

Members:
Planning and
Development Office
Health and Nutrition
Office
Department of
Education
Academe

Nongovernment or
Interfaith Oganization

Endorsed by:

Name Name
RIMTF Chairperson RC/SCWC Chairperson
Regional Director, DILG Regional Director, DSWD
 CHILD FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT
Region: _______________
C.Y.: _______________

Regional Audit Summary

(Reference for Technical Assistance )

Province City/Municipality Survival Development Protection Participation Governance Total

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Average Rating

Prepared by the Regional Inter-Agency Monitoring Task Force

Position Name Position/Designation Signature
Chairperson
Vice-Chairperson

Members:
Planning and Development
Office
Health and Nutrition Office

Department of Education

Academe

Nongovernment or Interfaith
Oganization

Noted by:

Name
RC/SCWC Chairperson
Regional Director, DSWD
 CHILD FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT
C.Y.: _______________

National Audit Summary

Region Province City/Municipality Rating

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Reviewed by the CWC Secretariat (Localization and Institutionalization Division)
Name Position Signature
1

10

Noted by:

MARIA ALPHA LARGA

OIC-Head, LID
Council for the Welfare of Children

Endorsed by:

MARY MITZI CAJAYON-UY

Executive Director
Council for the Welfare of Children
 CHILD FRIENDLY LOCAL GOVERNANCE AUDIT
C.Y.: _______________

Seal of Child Friendly Local Governance Conferees

SCFLG Code Region Province City/Municipality

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
As reviewed by the CWC Secretariat on _______________;
Endorsed by the CWC Technical Management Group on _______________; and
Approved by the CWC Board on _______________.

Noted by:

MARY MITZI CAJAYON-UY KARL CAESAR RIMANDO, CESO V

Executive Director Director, National Barangay Operations Office
Council for the Welfare of Children Department of the Interior and Local Governance