Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0360319922005614 Main
1 s2.0 S0360319922005614 Main
1 s2.0 S0360319922005614 Main
ScienceDirect
Article history: Small-size cobalt nanoparticles (NPs) distributed on nitrogen doped carbon support (Co/
Received 14 December 2021 NC-X) were prepared by pyrolysis of ZIF-67 at various temperatures (X ¼ 500, 600,700 and
Received in revised form 800 C) in nitrogen atmosphere and utilized as catalysts for hydrogen production through
25 January 2022 ammonia decomposition. Characterizations of the catalysts including XRD, HRTEM, XPS,
Accepted 4 February 2022 H2-TPR, CO2-TPD, etc., were conducted for structure analysis. The NeC plate obtained from
Available online 25 February 2022 pyrolysis was coated with Co NPs to hinder its aggregation, which made the Co NPs
dispersed evenly and increased their dispersion. The calcination temperature and the
Keywords: strong base of the support can adjust the strength of CoeN bond. The activity of the Co/NC-
Ammonia decomposition X catalysts is attributed to the high content of Co0 and the moderate CoeN bond strength.
Hydrogen production The ammonia decomposition activity of Co/NC-X catalysts in this paper is higher than
ZIF-67 many reported Co-based catalysts. Co/NC-600 catalyst demonstrates an ammonia con-
MOF version of 80% at 500 C with a space velocity of 30,000 ml g1 1
cat h , corresponding to a
* Corresponding author.
** Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: zplei@ahut.edu.cn (Z. Lei), yinfx@cczu.edu.cn (F. Yin).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.046
0360-3199/© 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2 12883
Fig. 1 e Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Co/NC-X (X ¼ 500, 600, 700, 800).
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2 12885
Fig. 2 e XRD patterns of precursor (A) ZIF-67 and (B) Co/NC-500, Co/NC-600, Co/NC-700, Co/NC-800 catalysts.
Fig. 3 e (A) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (B) pore size distribution from BJH desorption of Co/NC-500, Co/NC-600
and Co/NC-700 catalysts.
12886 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2
Fig. 4 e TEM (AeC), HTTEM (DeF) and particle diameter distribution profile (GeI) of the catalysts.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2 12887
structure which can been seen in Fig. 4AeF. The particle size 1s spectrum is fitted into C]O (531.8 eV) and CeO (532.5 eV)
distribution histogram (Fig. 4G) shows that 90% of the particle peaks. Fig. 6D depicts the Co 2p3/2 spectrum with the peaks at
size of Co/NC-500 is in the range of 4e7 nm. Correspondingly, 778.2 eV, 780.6 eV and 782.6 eV corresponding to Co0, CoeO
the particle distribution histogram of Co/NC-600 (Fig. 4H) and and CoeN/C, respectively [31]. Since CoeN and CoeC bonds
Co/NC-700 (Fig. 4I) shows that its particle diameter range is have similar binding energies, it is difficult to distinguish
4e10 and 5e10 nm, respectively. With the increase of pyrol- them from XPS spectra. Meanwhile, the CoeN/C bond shifts
ysis temperature, the catalyst particles were aggregated but obviously to the lower binding energy, which is consistent
not significantly, indicating that the active component Co of with the XPS results of N. Table 2 presents the relative atomic
the catalyst was evenly dispersed, and the NeC plate obtained ratio of surface composition, which also included the mass
by pyrolysis could effectively protect the aggregation of Co fraction of Co obtained by ICP. There is only a small amount
nanoparticles. In Fig. 5A, the lattice fringes of Co with a (11.6%) of Co0 in Co/NC-500. When the temperature continues
spacing of 0.194 nm can be clearly observed, corresponding to to rise to 600 C, Co0 ratio increases to 23.3%. However, when
the cobalt (111) plane, which is consistent with the XRD re- the temperature increases to 700 C, the content of Co0 de-
sults. In addition, Co nanoparticles are almost completely creases (18.6%). The formation of Co0 is due to the thermal
encased in carbon skeleton. The EDS Mappings (Fig. 5BeF) of reduction of Co2þ central cation in ZIF-67 during carboniza-
Co/NC-600 catalyst show that C, Co, O and N elements are tion, which is consistent with the XRD results. Co2þ mainly
uniformly distributed in Co/NC-600. exists on the surface and forms chemical bond with N. It can
XPS was employed to analyze the elemental chemical be found from the high resolution XPS spectrum of N that the
environment of catalysts surface. There are three types of N peak located at 398.7eV of Co2þ is attributed to NeCo bond [32].
can be identified from N 1s spectrum, in Fig. 6A, corresponding The H2-TPR is used to analyze the interaction between
to pyridinic N (398.7eV), pyrrole N (400.3eV) and graphite N active component and support, and further to evaluate cata-
(401.5eV). It can be found that the peak of Pyridinic N shifts to lytic activity (Fig. 7). According to previous reports [33], the TPR
higher binding energy as the calcination temperature rises. spectrum of Co based catalysts usually includes two parts: (1)
The relative atomic ratio of Pyridinic N decreases with the the reduction peak at low temperature (150e375 C) corre-
pyrolysis temperature of catalyst increasing, which is due to sponds to the process of Co3O4 reduction to CoO. (2) The
the instability of Pyridinic N at high temperature (Table 2). The reduction peak at high temperature (375e650 C) corresponds
spectrum of C 1s (Fig. 6B) is fitted into three peaks attributed to to the process of CoO reduction to metal Co. The TPR diagram
CeC (284.6 eV), CeN (285.4 eV) and CeO (286.9 eV). Fig. 6C of O of Co/NC-500 showed a weak shoulder peak at about 217 C
Fig. 5 e HRTEM (A, B) and EDS Mapping (C-F) of element C, N, O and Co for Co/NC-600.
12888 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2
and a major reduction peak at about 483 C. The peak at 217 C molecule, CO2 was adsorbed and desorbed by temperature-
corresponds to the reduction of Co3þ to Co2þ, while the peak at programmed desorption to determine the alkaline potential
483 C corresponds to the reduction of Co2þ to Co0, where the of the catalyst. The desorption peak in the range of 100e200 C
wide peak is caused by methanation overlap [34]. Similarly, is attributed to the interaction between CO2 and the weakly
the TPR diagram of Co/NC-600 shows a major reduction peak alkaline site in the catalyst [35]. The desorption peak in the
at 506 C, and the reduction temperature shifts to higher range of 300e500 C is due to the interaction between CO2 and
temperature relative to Co/NC-500. Meanwhile, there is a the moderately alkaline site in the catalyst, while the
small peak at 205 C attributed to the reduction from Co3þ to desorption peak in the range of 600e800 C is due to the
Co2þ. The TPR diagram of Co/NC-700 shows a major reduction interaction between CO2 and the strongly alkaline site. The
peak at about 533 C and a weak shoulder peak at about 180 C. desorption peaks of Co/NC-500 were observed at 230 C, 420 C
It can be seen that with the increase of the pyrolysis tem- and 600 C, corresponding to weak alkaline sites, moderate
perature, the reduction peak of the sample at about 500 C alkaline sites and strong alkaline sites. Compared with Co/NC-
shifts to higher temperature, which is due to the existence of 500, the moderate alkaline sites and strong alkaline sites of
CoeN bonds that make the reduction process more difficult. Co/NC-600 migrates to high temperature. The moderately
The desorption behavior of CO from the catalysts to alkaline and strongly alkaline sites of Co/NC-700 also shift to
explore the number of active sites was showed in Fig. 8A. The high temperature. However, there are significantly less strong
desorption peaks of Co/NC-500, Co/NC-600 and Co/NC-700 basic sites which is due to the high temperature reduction of
catalysts were 196, 148 and 175 C, respectively. Based on pyridinic N portion.
the peak area of CO-TPD diagrams and assumption of an
adsorption of one per metal atom, the Co metal dispersion Catalytic activity
ratios of Co/NC-500, Co/NC-600 and Co/NC-700 catalysts were
17.1%, 28.4% and 21.9%, respectively. Fig. 8B shows the CO2- Fig. 9A shows the catalytic activities of the Co/NC-X catalysts
TPD diagram of Co/NC-X samples. As an acidic probe for ammonia decomposition. When the temperature is below
Fig. 6 e XPS diagrams of Co/NC-500, Co/NC-600 and Co/NC-700 catalysts: (A) N 1s, (B) C 1s, (C) O 1s, and (D) Co 2p.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2 12889
Brief discussion
Fig. 8 e (A) CO-TPD and (B) CO2-TPD diagrams of Co/NC-X (X ¼ 500, 600, 700) catalysts.
12890 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2
Fig. 9 e (A) Diagram of ammonia decomposition activity of the catalyst; (B) Hydrogen production rate diagram.
Fig. 10 e (A) Arrhenius plots for NH3 decomposition over catalysts; (B) Ammonia decomposition stability of Co/NC-600
catalyst.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2 12891
neither weak nor strong, which is just conducive to the reac- Manufacturing Collaborative Innovation Center, Changzhou
tion. Huo et al. [45] also obtained that Co0$89Fe2$11O4@mSiO2 University (ACGM2016-06-02 and ACGM2016-06-03), A Project
showed the highest catalytic activity of ammonia decompo- Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of
sition due to medium M N bond energy. Wang et al. [25] used Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.
N2-TPD and mass spectrometry to test the strength of M N
bond (M is Fe, Co, Ni and Cu), among which CueN bond is the
weakest and FeeN bond is the strongest. Meanwhile, the re-
references
sults of ammonia decomposition activity showed that CoeN
bonds of moderate strength give high NH3 conversions.
[1] Taherian Z, Khataee A, Han N, Orooji Y. Hydrogen production
As is known to all, the support strongly affects the elec-
through methane reforming processes using promoted-Ni/
tronic state of the active sites to alter the catalytic activity and
mesoporous silica: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 2022;107:20e30.
the decomposition performance of ammonia [46,47]. It has [2] Lee JE, Shafiq I, Hussain M, Lam SS, Rhee GH, Park Y-K. A
been reported that the contribution of the alkaline electron- review on integrated thermochemical hydrogen production
donor to the active sites can reduce the binding energy of from water. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022;47:4346e56.
the active center and the N, thus increasing the activity of the [3] Zeng Z, Luo B, Jing D, Guo L. Hydrogen production versus
catalyst [48,49]. From the order of the strong alkaline potential photocatalyst dimension under concentrated solar light: a
case over titanium dioxide. Sol Energy 2021;230:538e48.
of the catalyst in Fig. 6, Co/NC-700 > Co/NC-600 > Co/NC-500,
[4] Borisov VA, Iost KN, Temerev VL, Simunin MM,
with the increase of the calcination temperature, the strong Leont'eva NN, Mikhlin YL, et al. Ammonia decomposition Ru
alkaline potential of the catalyst shifts to high temperature, catalysts supported on alumina nanofibers for hydrogen
indicating that the interaction between Co and support N generation. Mater Lett 2022;306:130842.
doped C is gradually enhanced and the alkaline potential of [5] Pinzo n M, Ruiz-Lo pez E, Romero A, de la Osa AR, Sa nchez P,
Co/NC-600 is in the middle range. This is consistent with the de Lucas-Consuegra A. Electrochemical activation of Ru
results of H2-TPR and XPS analyses, which further indicates catalyst with alkaline ion conductors for the catalytic
decomposition of ammonia. Mol Catal 2021;511:111721.
that the moderately strong CoeN bond promotes the
[6] Schüth F, Palkovits R, Schlo € gl R, Su DS. Ammonia as a
ammonia decomposition reaction. possible element in an energy infrastructure: catalysts for
ammonia decomposition. Energy Environ Sci 2012;5:6278e89.
[7] Mukherjee S, Devaguptapu SV, Sviripa A, Lund CRF, Wu G.
Conclusion Low-temperature ammonia decomposition catalysts for
hydrogen generation. Appl Catal B Environ 2018;226:162e81.
[8] Huang C, Yu Y, Yang J, Yan Y, Wang D, Hu F, et al. Ru/La2O3
Co/NC-X (X ¼ 500, 600, 700, 800) catalysts have been prepared
catalyst for ammonia decomposition to hydrogen. Appl Surf
by directly pyrolyze ZIF-67 precursor at different tempera-
Sci 2019;476:928e36.
tures for ammonia decomposition. The Co/NC-600 catalyst [9] Huang C, Li H, Yang J, Wang C, Hu F, Wang X, et al. Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2
possesses 80% conversion of ammonia at 500 C with a space solid solutions-supported NiCo bimetal nanocatalysts for NH3
velocity of 30,000 ml g1
cat h
1
and maintains even 72 h without decomposition. Appl Surf Sci 2019;478:708e16.
attenuation. The size-dependent effect of Co/NC catalyst with [10] Yu Y, Gan Y-M, Huang C, Lu Z-H, Wang X, Zhang R, et al. Ni/
nanoparticle size of 4e10 nm is not the main factor. The NeC La2O3 and Ni/MgO-La2O3 catalysts for the decomposition of
NH3 into hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2020;45:16528e39.
plate obtained from pyrolysis can effectively protect the ag-
[11] Li L, Gan Y-M, Lu Z-H, Xiaohu Yu, Qing S, Gao Z, et al. The
gregation of Co nanoparticles, so that the active components
effects of Fe, Co and Ni doping in CuAl2O4 spinel surface and
of the catalyst are evenly dispersed and the number of active bulk: a DFT study. Appl Surf Sci 2020;521:146478.
sites is increased. Tuning the calcination temperature of [12] Yao Q, Lu Z-H, Wang Y, Chen X, Feng G. Synergetic catalysis
catalyst can significantly adjust the CoeN bond strength and of non-noble bimetallic Cu-Co nanoparticles embedded in
subsequently optimize the catalytic performance. This SiO2 nanospheres in hydrolytic dehydrogenation of
approach could be extended to fabricate more metal sup- ammonia borane. J Phys Chem C 2015;119:14167e74.
[13] Zhang H, Alhamed YA, Kojima Y, Al-Zahrani AA, Miyaoka H,
ported carbon doped nitrogen for promising energy storage
Petrov LA. Structure and catalytic properties of Ni/MWCNTs
and conversion application. and Ni/AC catalysts for hydrogen production via ammonia
decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:277e87.
[14] Hu X-C, Wang W-W, Jin Z, Wang X, Si R, Jia C-J. Transition
Declaration of competing interest metal nanoparticles supported La-promoted MgO as
catalysts for hydrogen production via catalytic
decomposition of ammonia. J Energy Chem 2019;38:41e9.
The authors declare that they have no known competing
[15] Gu Y, Ma Y, Long Z, Zhao S, Wang Y, Zhang W. One-pot
financial interests or personal relationships that could have synthesis of supported Ni@Al2O3 catalysts with uniform
appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. small-sized Ni for hydrogen generation via ammonia
decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2021;46:4045e54.
[16] Wang Z, Qu Y, Shen X, Cai Z. Ruthenium catalyst supported
on Ba modified ZrO2 for ammonia decomposition to COx-free
Acknowledgments hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44:7300e7.
[17] Chen J, Zhu ZH, Wang S, Ma Q, Rudolph V, Lu GQ. Effects of
This work is supported by the National Natural Science nitrogen doping on the structure of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)
Foundation of China (21878001, 22078002 and 22078027). Spe- and activity of Ru/CNTs in ammonia decomposition. Chem
Eng J 2010;156:404e10.
cial thanks to the support from Advanced Catalysis and Green
12892 i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n e n e r g y 4 7 ( 2 0 2 2 ) 1 2 8 8 2 e1 2 8 9 2
[18] Duan X, Qian G, Zhou X, Chen D, Yuan W. MCM-41 supported reduction and catalytic test in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.
CoMo bimetallic catalysts for enhanced hydrogen production Appl Catal Gen 2016;523:221e9.
by ammonia decomposition. Chem Eng J 2012;207e208:103e8. [35] Podila S, Driss H, Zaman SF, Alhamed YA, AlZahrani AA,
[19] Huang C, Yu Y, Tang X, Liu Z, Zhang J, Ye C, et al. Hydrogen Daous MA, et al. Hydrogen generation by ammonia
generation by ammonia decomposition over Co/CeO2 decomposition using Co/MgO-La2O3 catalyst: influence of
catalyst: influence of support morphologies. Appl Surf Sci support calcination atmosphere. J Mol Catal Chem
2020;532:147335. 2016;414:130e9.
[20] Bell TE, Me nard H, Gonza lez Carballo JM, Tooze R, Torrente- [36] Li X, Ji W, Zhao J, Wang S, Au C. Ammonia decomposition
Murciano L. Hydrogen production from ammonia over Ru and Ni catalysts supported on fumed SiO2, MCM-41,
decomposition using Co/g-Al2O3 catalysts e insights into the and SBA-15. J Catal 2005;236:181e9.
effect of synthetic method. Int J Hydrogen Energy [37] Li L, Zhu ZH, Yan ZF, Lu GQ, Rintoul L. Catalytic ammonia
2020;45:27210e20. decomposition over Ru/carbon catalysts: the importance of the
[21] Zhong G, Liu D, Zhang J. The application of ZIF-67 and its structure of carbon support. Appl Catal Gen 2007;320:166e72.
derivatives: adsorption, separation, electrochemistry and [38] Ji J, Duan X, Qian G, Zhou X, Tong G, Yuan W. Towards an
catalysts. J Mater Chem 2018;6:1887e99. efficient CoMo/g-Al2O3 catalyst using metal amine metallate
[22] Huang H, Li JR, Wang K, Han T, Tong M, Li L, et al. An in situ as an active phase precursor: enhanced hydrogen production
self-assembly template strategy for the preparation of by ammonia decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energy
hierarchical-pore metal-organic frameworks. Nat Commun 2014;39:12490e8.
2015;6:8847. [39] Duan X, Qian G, Zhou X, Chen D, Yuan W. MCM-41 supported
[23] Shi L, Wang T, Zhang H, Chang K, Ye J. Electrostatic self- Co-Mo bimetallic catalysts for enhanced hydrogen production
assembly of nanosized carbon nitride nanosheet onto a by ammonia decomposition. Chem Eng J 2012;207e208:103e8.
zirconium metal-organic framework for enhanced [40] Zhang H, Alhamed YA, Al-Zahrani A, Daous M, Inokawa H,
photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv Funct Mater 2015;25:5360e7. Kojima Y, et al. Tuning catalytic performances of cobalt
[24] Qian J, Sun F, Qin L. Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolitic catalysts for clean hydrogen generation via variation of the
imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) nanocrystals. Mater Lett type of carbon support and catalyst post-treatment
2012;82:220e3. temperature. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2014;39:17573e82.
[25] Wang L, Yi Y, Zhao Y, Zhang R, Zhang J, Guo H. NH3 [41] Tan H, Li K, Sioud S, Cha D, Amad MH, Hedhili MN, et al.
decomposition for H2 generation: effects of cheap metals and Synthesis of Ru nanoparticles confined in magnesium oxide-
supports on plasma-catalyst synergy. ACS Catal 2015;5:4167e74. modified mesoporous alumina and their enhanced catalytic
[26] Yu L, Abild-Pedersen F. Bond order conservation strategies in performance during ammonia decomposition. Catal
catalysis applied to the NH3 decomposition reaction. ACS Commun 2012;26:248e52.
Catal 2016;7:864e71. [42] Podila S, Driss H, Zaman SF, Ali AM, Al-Zahrani AA,
[27] Huo L, Han X, Zhang L, Liu B, Gao R, Cao B, et al. Spatial Daous MA, et al. Effect of preparation methods on the
confinement and electron transfer moderating Mo-N bond catalyst performance of Co/MgLa mixed oxide catalyst for
strength for superior ammonia decomposition catalysis. COx-free hydrogen production by ammonia decomposition.
Appl Catal B Environ 2021;294:120254. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:24213e21.
[28] Jin L, Fu Z, Qian X, Li F, Wang Y, Wang B, et al. Co-N/KB [43] Huang C, Yu Y, Tang X, Liu Z, Zhang J, Ye C, et al. Hydrogen
porous hybrid derived from ZIF 67/KB as a separator generation by ammonia decomposition over Co/CeO2
modification material for lithium-sulfur batteries. catalyst: influence of support morphologies. Appl Surf Sci
Electrochim Acta 2021:382. 2020;532:147335.
[29] Ma TY, Dai S, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ. Metal-organic framework [44] Zhong JQ, Zhou X, Yuan K, Wright CA, Tadich A, Qi D, et al.
derived hybrid Co3O4-carbon porous nanowire arrays as Probing the effect of the Pt-Ni-Pt(111) bimetallic surface
reversible oxygen evolution electrodes. J Am Chem Soc electronic structures on the ammonia decomposition
2014;136:13925e31. reaction. Nanoscale 2017;9:666e72.
[30] Zhong L, Zhou H, Li R, Bian T, Wang S, Yuan A. In situ [45] Huo L, Liu B, Li H, Cao B, Hu X-c, Fu X-p, et al. Component
confinement pyrolysis of ZIF-67 nanocrystals on hollow synergy and armor protection induced superior catalytic
carbon spheres towards efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen activity and stability of ultrathin Co-Fe spinel nanosheets
reduction. J Colloid Interface Sci 2021;584:439e48. confined in mesoporous silica shells for ammonia
[31] Qian M, Cheng X, Sun T, Tian J, Isimjan TT, Shi Z, et al. decomposition reaction. Appl Catal B Environ 2019;253:121e30.
Synergistic catalytic effect of N-doped carbon embedded [46] Yin S-F, Zhang Q-H, Xu B-Q, Zhu W-X, Ng C-F, Au C-T.
with CoFe-rich CoFe2O4 clusters as highly efficient catalyst Investigation on the catalysis of COx-free hydrogen
towards oxygen reduction. J Alloys Compd 2020;819:153015. generation from ammonia. J Catal 2004;224:384e96.
[32] Gou H, Li W, Yang Y, Li X, Cui H, Liu Y, et al. Porous skeleton- [47] Yin SF, Xu BQ, Zhou XP, Au CT. A mini-review on ammonia
stabilized Co/N-C coated separator for boosting lithium-ion decomposition catalysts for on-site generation of hydrogen
batteries stability and safety. J Power Sources for fuel cell applications. Appl Catal Gen 2004;277:1e9.
2021;499:229933. [48] Okura K, Okanishi T, Muroyama H, Matsui T, Eguchi K.
[33] Zhang H, Alhamed YA, Chu W, Ye Z, AlZahrani A, Petrov L. Additive effect of alkaline earth metals on ammonia
Controlling Co-support interaction in Co/MWCNTs catalysts decomposition reaction over Ni/Y2O3 catalysts. RSC Adv
and catalytic performance for hydrogen production via NH3 2016;6:85142e8.
decomposition. Appl Catal Gen 2013;464e465:156e64. [49] Okura K, Okanishi T, Muroyama H, Matsui T, Eguchi K.
[34] Chernyak SA, Suslova EV, Ivanov AS, Egorov AV, Promotion effect of rare-earth elements on the catalytic
Maslakov KI, Savilov SV, et al. Co catalysts supported on decomposition of ammonia over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. Appl
oxidized CNTs: evolution of structure during preparation, Catal Gen 2015;505:77e85.