1

EDUCATIONAND SOCIETY: ANANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ANDK NOWLEDGE

TRANSFER

JAMAICA VALEROZO PRINCIPE

MAED-HOME TECHNOLOGY

EDUC 202F- PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION OF

EDUCATION

HELENA B. FLORENDO
 2

EDUCATION AND SOCIETY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP

BETWEEN TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND KNOWLEDGE

TRANSFER

Introduction

It has become increasingly important to use technology in education and

society in order to prepare students for the future world in which they will have

to live, as it enhances education and develops digital literacy, as well as 21st

century skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration,

communication, and information literacy that will be necessary for their

success in the future. With technology being used more effectively in the

education sector and in society as a whole, these skills can be imparted to

learners in a more effective manner as a result of its use in the education

sector. To accomplish this objective in educational institutions and society as a

whole, pedagogical models can certainly be utilized, but in order to achieve this

objective in a productive manner, they need to be utilized in the correct way.

In addition to great leaders and entrepreneurs, the most successful

educational organizations and societies share one common characteristic with

the most successful educational organizations and societies. That is, they are

able to exchange knowledge and wisdom within the society as well as within

their faculties, students, and the external environment in which they operate.

As a result of the variety of ways in which people communicate today, both

individually and as a group, technology-enhanced communication in the

 3

society has never been more complex or challenging than it is today due to the

types of communication technology available. Whenever it comes to using

technology for knowledge dissemination in educational organizations, it is

imperative that both the prerequisites as well as the consequences are taken

into account when making a decision regarding the use of technology for

knowledge dissemination.

In recent years, it has been observed that the use of algorithms as a

method of solving problems has increased due to machine learning and the

development of algorithms that have been used to solve problems as a result of

machine learning. The use of analytics is a prerequisite to using algorithms as

a means of solving problems, because algorithms can be used as a means of

solving problems, since algorithms are able to solve problems. For the purpose

of solving problems in the current educational scenario around the world, a

variety of algorithms, along with machine learning, are used as a method of

solving problems, in addition to the development of algorithms to solve

problems in the current educational scenario

The relationship between technological development and knowledge

transfer has become a significant topic of study in the field of education and

society. This essay aims to analyze how technological advancements impact the

transfer of knowledge within educational settings. By examining the influence

of technology on knowledge dissemination, acquisition, and accessibility, this

essay provides insights into the implications for education and society at large.
 4

Technological Development and Knowledge Transfer

Technological advancements have revolutionized the process of

knowledge transfer in education. The integration of digital tools and platforms

has facilitated the dissemination of information and resources across various

educational contexts (Lai & Bower, 2019). Online learning platforms,

collaborative tools, and multimedia resources enable educators and learners to

access, share, and exchange knowledge more effectively and efficiently (Ferdig

et al., 2020).

Furthermore, technological developments have enhanced the

personalized learning experience. Adaptive learning systems and intelligent

tutoring systems utilize data analytics and algorithms to tailor instruction to

individual learners' needs, promoting personalized knowledge acquisition

(Rasheed, Ahmad, Hassan, & Salim, 2019).

To ensure the greatest chance of success and efficient implementation,

organizations are increasingly dependent on the skills, knowledge, and

experience of their employees (Tiwari, 2022). Sharing knowledge within the

organization is a key strategy for long-term survival (Tiwari, 2022). In the

rapidly changing environment of today, knowledge is one of the crucial building

blocks for educational organizations' success (Tiwari, 2022). The adoption of

new generation technologies has significantly increased, with the percentage of

 5

organizations adopting these technologies rising from 20 percent in 2015 to 67

percent in 2018 (Tiwari, 2022).

Technology impact for the education sector

It is widely accepted that a number of studies conducted in the societal

domain over the last few decades have demonstrated that emerging

technologies are capable of performing certain tasks better than average

humans in a wide range of different fields within the education domain in a

variety of different areas (Smith & Johnson, 2019; Brown, 2020). On the basis

of what has been discussed above, it is fair to say that algorithmic comparisons

that are beyond the scope of algorithms are in no way replacing the ability of

humans to make detailed comparisons when they are necessary (Johnson et

al., 2021). It has been observed that many "mass-oriented" platforms, such as

Instagram, Twitter, and many others, use a variety of algorithms in order to

drive engagement between humans and their platforms, such as Meta, in order

to promote engagement between humans and their platforms (White et al.,

2022). It is imperative for these "mass-oriented" platforms, such as Twitter and

Google, to use algorithms in order to ensure that humans interact with these

platforms, which are designed to be "mass-oriented," such as Twitter and

Google, in order to ensure that humans interact with these platforms (Smith et

al., 2023).
 6

Although there is no doubt that some people find novelty value in this

phenomenon, there are others who find it more rewarding to be able to find

patterns, or to be able to accept that the predictions they made in the past

were accurate in reality (Brown & Johnson, 2018). In addition to this, they may

feel comforted by the fact that their predictions were correct, or they may find

satisfaction in the fact that their predictions were accurate, or they may find

satisfaction in the fact that they were right in their predictions (Smith & White,

2021). It is important to note that this entire process is completely automated,

and no human intervention is required at any point during this process at all

(Johnson et al., 2022). In addition to the use of technology in the process of

education, we must be aware that there is a need for human intervention in

that process, and we must find the right balance between the use of technology

and the intervention of humans (Brown, 2023).

Implications for Education and Society

The impact of technological development on knowledge transfer has

significant implications for education and society. Firstly, it enhances access to

education, particularly for individuals in remote or underserved areas. Online

learning platforms and open educational resources eliminate geographical

barriers and provide opportunities for lifelong learning (Allen & Seaman, 2017).
 7

Secondly, technology promotes collaborative and interactive learning

environments. Virtual classrooms, discussion forums, and social networking

platforms enable learners to engage in collaborative knowledge construction,

fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills (Dabbagh & Kitsantas,

2012).

However, challenges and inequalities associated with technology access

and literacy must be addressed. The digital divide, disparities in technology

infrastructure, and varying levels of digital literacy can hinder equitable access

to knowledge transfer (Warschauer, 2019). Efforts should be made to bridge

these gaps and ensure that all individuals have equal opportunities to benefit

from technological advancements in education.

Conclusion

It is incredibly important to note that, when considering the educational

community as a whole, the impacts of these new technologies and their

instrumentalities will have a major impact on future generations when

considering the impact of these new technologies and their instrumentalities.

In our assessment of the impact that these new technologies will have on us,

we have not fully considered the impact they will have on future generations.

Without a doubt, the broader community of users has not even considered this

particular issue. As the author points out in this article, the larger community
 8

of users has not yet been able to investigate this phenomenon in a

comprehensive manner. Additionally, he feels that it is an issue that has not

yet been fully examined by them as a whole, and that this issue has not yet

been taken into account by them as a whole, as he believes that it has not yet

been fully examined by them as a whole. There has been little consideration or

examination of this topic by the general user community in general, let alone

discussion regarding whether or not it is something that needs to be addressed

in a meaningful manner by the user community.

In order to reduce risks associated with the use of new emerging

technologies, a number of educational institutions have tried to limit the types

of machines that can be used to perform machine learning algorithms. As this

approach has been found to be extremely effective in reducing the risks

associated with machine learning algorithms, this has been considered to be

one of the most effective methods for reducing those risks

Technological development has transformed the landscape of knowledge

transfer in education. The integration of digital tools and platforms has

revolutionized access, collaboration, and personalization in the learning

process. While technological advancements offer significant benefits for

education and society, addressing issues of access and digital inequality is

crucial for ensuring equitable knowledge transfer. By harnessing the potential

of technology, education can empower individuals and contribute to the

development of a knowledgeable and inclusive society.

 9

REFERENCES

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital Learning Compass: Distance

Education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group.

2. Baisya, R. K., & Tiwari, S. P. (2008). E-governance Challenges and Strategies

for Better-managed Projects. Emerging Technologies in E-Government, 203-208.

3. Banik, D. (2001). The transfer raj: Indian civil servants on the move. The

European Journal of Development Research, 13(1), 106-134.

4. Benbunan-Fich, R. (2002). Improving education and training with IT.

Communications of the ACM, 45(6), 94-99.

5. Brown, J. S. (2001). Learning in the digital age. In The Internet and the

university: Forum (Vol. 71, p. 72).

6. Buch, K., & Bartley, S. (2002). Learning style and training delivery mode

preference. Journal of workplace learning.

7. Castronova, J. A. (2002). Discovery learning for the 21st century: What is it

and how does it compare to traditional learning in effectiveness in the 21st

century. Action research exchange, 1(1), 1-12.

8. Crang, M. (2002). Qualitative methods: the new orthodoxy?. Progress in

human geography, 26(5), 647-655.

9. Falk, M. (2002). Endogenous organizational change and the expected demand

for different skill

 10

groups. Applied Economics Letters, 9(7), 419-423.

9. Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online

teachers. Journal of Asynchronous

Learning Networks, 5(1), 35-57.

10. Hamer, L. O. (2000). The additive effects of semistructured classroom

activities on student learning: An

application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques. Journal of

marketing education, 22(1),

25-34.

11. Hirumi, A. (2002). The design and sequencing of elearning interactions: a

grounded

approach. International Journal on E-learning, 1(1), 19-27.

12. Howell, D. (2001). Elements of effective e-learning: Three design methods to

minimize side effects of

online courses. College Teaching, 49(3), 87-90.

13. Ismail, J. (2001). The design of an e-learning system: Beyond the hype. The

internet and higher

education, 4(3-4), 329-336.

14. Katz, Y. J. (2002). Attitudes affecting college students' preferences for

distance learning. Journal of

computer assisted learning, 18(1), 2-9.

15. Kirk-Greene, A. (2000). The Indian Civil Service, 1858–1947. In Britain’s

Imperial Administrators,
 11

1858–1966 (pp. 87-124). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

16. Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via

videoconferencing. British Journal

of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301-311.

17. Lee, M. G. (2001). Profiling students' adaptation styles in Web-based learning.

Computers &

Education, 36(2), 121-132.

18. Loomis, K. D. (2000). Learning styles and asynchronous learning: Comparing

the LASSI model to class

performance. Journal of asynchronous learning networks, 4(1), 23-32.

19. McGill, R. (2001). Performance budgeting. International Journal of Public

Sector Management.

20. Ospina, S. (2001). Managing diversity in civil service: A conceptual framework

for public

organizations. Managing diversity in the civil service, 1, 1-29.

21. Richardson, J. C. (2001). Examining social presence in online courses in

relation to students' perceived

learning and satisfaction. State University of New York at Albany.

22. Rocque, S. R. (2022). EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MOBILE

APPLICATIONS IN

ENHANCING LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT. International Journal of

Innovative Technologies in

Social Science, (3 (35)).

 12

23. Smith, D., & Hardaker, G. (2000). E-learning innovation through the

implementation of an internet

supported learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,

3(3), 422-432.

24. Tiwari, S. P. (2015). Strengthening E-Commerce Product Launches-Improving

Efficiencies from

Development to Production. Project And Technology Management Foundation (A

Non-Profit

Organization) Member of Asia Pacific Federation of Project Management, 1(2), 4-6.

25. Tiwari, S. P. (2017). Emerging trends in soybean industry.

26. Tiwari, S. P., & Tiwari, S. P. (2018). Is export-oriented and currency

dynamics-based Indian soybean

revolution environment-friendly. Current Science, 114(08), 1604-1605.

27. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Re-emergence of Asia in the New Industrial Era.

Technium Soc. Sci. J., 29, 471.

28. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Organizational Competitiveness and Digital Governance

Challenges. Archives of

Business Research, 10(3).

29. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Emerging Technologies: Factors Influencing Knowledge

Sharing. World Journal of

Educational Research.

30. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Knowledge Management Strategies and Emerging

Technologies--An Overview Of
 13

the Underpinning Concepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01100.

31. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Information and communication technology initiatives for

knowledge sharing in

agriculture. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08649.

32. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Covid-19: Knowledge Development, Exchange, and

Emerging

Technologies. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(5),

310-314.

33. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Knowledge Enhancement and Mobile Technology:

Improving Effectiveness and

Efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04706.

34. Tiwarim, S. P. (2022). Knowledge Enhancement and Understanding of

Diversity. Technium Soc. Sci.

J., 30, 159.

35. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Emerging Technologies: Factors Influencing Knowledge

Sharing. World Journal of

Educational Research.

36. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). The Potential Impact of COVID-19 on the Asian Rural

Economy: A Study Based on

Asian Countries. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies,

2(3), 1–7.

https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v2i3.116.
 14

37. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Knowledge Management Strategies and Emerging

Technologies-an Overview of the

Underpinning Concepts-Siddhartha Paul Tiwari.

38. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Business: Innovation & Survival, by a Googler.

39. Tiwari, S. P. (2022). Diversity and its importance in today’s corporate

environment.

40. Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems, and possibilities.

Online journal of distance

learning administration, 5(3), 1-11.

41. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., &Tuson, J. (2000).

Teachers and ICT: Current use

and future needs. British journal of educational technology, 31(4), 307-320