Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REVIEW
REVIEW
Acemoglu and Robinson’s Why Nations Fail [2012] is a grand history in the style of
Diamond [1997] or McNeil [1963]. Like those books, this book is exceptionally fun to read and
full of interesting historical examples and provocative ideas. The basic theme of the book is that
what matters most in why some nations fail – and others succeed, for the book is as much about
success as failure – are not – as earlier authors have argued - economic policies, geography,
culture, or value systems – but rather institutions, more precisely the political institutions that
In the book raises the example of Nogales that is divided only by a border but by
The implications of the organization of colonial society and institutional laws are the
same that have created the current differences between the US and Latin America. This is
because Latin America was conquered by the Spanish who colonized countries by capturing the
leader and the people used to extract precious metals and food. While the English, touch them
what remained, colonized United States where the same mechanism of coercion did not work
because the people did not allow themselves to master the English had to work and were granted
incentives. Among the countries there are inequalities due to institutional factors both economic
and political. Political instability is an influential when people choose to live factor. innovations,
such as transportation, increased international trade was causing Latin America's poorest and
Many scientists have tried to explain the reasons for poverty and prosperity in the
countries, which have created different hypotheses. The first is related to geography, which states
that due to its location: the countries in the tropics are poor because people tend to be lazy soils
do not allow productive agriculture and disease have a major impact on worker productivity and
the rich tend to be found in temperate latitudes. The hypothesis of culture means that countries
do not thrive because of their beliefs, but by the example of China can realize that it is not
because he has had a high economic growth. While ignorance hypothesis states that the leaders
do not know how to turn a poor country into a rich, believes that countries are poor because of
market failures and economists and policymakers have given bad advice in the past.
activities that better use of their talents and skills, allow you to choose what they want and
distribute power in society. They promote economic activity, productivity growth and economic
prosperity through technology and education. Extractive institutions are those that give all the
power and gain an elite, so they tend to persist over time. The State is responsible for promoting
law and order, private property and in some cases provide public goods so this intertwined with
Chapter IV: Small Differences and Critical Junctures: The Weight of History
In England the technological advances, the business unit to expand and invest, and
efficient use of the skills and talent by having inclusive institutions were. After a critical moment
happens small differences that are the initial institutional distinctions that create different
answers emerge. The countries have small differences between the decisions taken at the end of
the day affect their welfare in the long term. . The differences created by the institutional changes
have consequences, because they influence how society reacts to changes in economic or
Both extractive institutions and generate inclusive growth, but this is different. Extractive
institutions this gain concentrated in the elites and for that growth to happen there must be a
policy that creates incentives centralization, but this always ends up collapsing because it is not
sustainable. There is evidence that the onset of extractive institutions a complex society,
characterized by the hierarchy, order and inequality leading to a sedentary life arises when
development. Extractive institutions cannot create sustained technological change, as the elites
Rome and Venice were the cities with the extensive development of inclusive institutions
however these early steps were reversed. Economic growth supported by inclusive institutions
political and then economic, that the elite does not lose its power. It is because of differences,
which are often small, which can easily be reversed and are not necessarily the result of a simple
cumulative process. The fact that they can be reversed shows that there is a cumulative simple
process of institutional improvement. Small institutional differences that play a crucial role at
critical moments are by their nature ephemeral, they can be reversed or resurface.
This chapter expresses his main ideas through English history. It explains how at first
there was a monarchy and extractive institutions but over time the parliament was established
becomes more pluralistic, increased political centralization and allowing create inclusive
societies. Expressed as politicians are afraid of the destructive creation, for this is the
reflecting inefficient frees areas in the economy that can be used more efficiently. In inclusive
institutions greater incentives so germinate more easily, while mining may create conflicts as the
Glorious Revolution are created. Parliament took control of the state policy thus creating a more
pluralistic political institution and building the foundations for inclusive economic institution.
The industrial revolution created a critical situation that affected almost all countries.
With the Industrial Revolution which favored printing literature, education and economic
progress it arises. Some countries took advantage of this and encouraged its citizens to invest in
technology making them grow faster. However, there are cases such as ottomans that banned for
fear of destructive creation and for this reason compared to other countries fell behind.
This chapter expresses his main ideas by certain examples such as Bands Islands and
South Africa. These constituted extractive economic institutions which were imposed as a result
of absolutist regimes or lack of centralized states that did not allow the technological changes
brought prosperity and poverty targeting of these countries. In the case of the Bands Islands we
see is made up of solid states however due to genocide, including the death of the leaders, I
resulted in the creation of an extractive institutions. This destroyed the commercial and industrial
activity bringing underdevelopment. African societies were less centralized and although the
purchase of slaves was abolished by the Europeans in Africa are still using slaves making them
work there. In South Africa the Europeans imposed new institutions based on cheap labor
In Australia they convict they are incentivized to work and fought them more inclusive
economic institutions. These inclusive institutions allowed by the Industrial Revolution the
country began to get rich. In France in order absolutism institutions that were inclusive and to
expand through the French Revolution imposed in the rest of Europe were created. These
changes created inclusive institutions that allowed industrialization is spreading. The Industrial
Revolution also brought consequences in China and Japan, which diverged through this critical
time. While Japanese institutions were in the process of transformation and the economy had
embarked on a path of rapid growth, China forces fighting for institutional change were not
Political and economic institutions persist over time due to the virtuous circle: a powerful
positive feedback process that keeps these institutions against attempts to undermine and set in
motion forces that drive these are even more inclusive. The virtuous circle emerges from
pluralism, the rule of law and inclusive political institutions because they tend to support
inclusive economic institutions. Pluralism also creates a more open system and allows
independent media to flourish, making it easier for groups that have an interest in the
continuation of inclusive institutions and organize awareness against threats to such institutions.
The process creates a vicious circle of negative feedback extractive extractive political
institutions that shape economic institutions that enrich a few who have the resources at the
expense of many and ensuring the continuity of his power and succeed in doing so. Extractive
economic institutions create a basis for the persistence of extractive political institutions.
Extractive political institutions tend to create a vicious circle because they do not provide line of
defense against those who would usurp and to misuse the powers of the State.
The industrial revolution created a critical situation that affected almost all countries.
With the Industrial Revolution which favored printing literature, education and economic
progress it arises. Some countries took advantage of this and encouraged its citizens to invest in
technology making them grow faster. However, there are cases such as ottomans that banned for
fear of destructive creation and for this reason compared to other countries fell behind.
Absolutism and lack of political centralization are two different barriers to the spread of the
industry. But they are also connected, both are held in place by fear of creative destruction and
because the process of political centralization often creates a tendency towards absolutism.
This chapter expresses his main ideas by certain examples such as Bands Islands and
South Africa. These constituted extractive economic institutions which were imposed as a result
of absolutist regimes or lack of centralized states that did not allow the technological changes
brought prosperity and poverty targeting of these countries. In the case of the Bands Islands, we
see is made up of solid states however due to genocide, including the death of the leaders, I
Australia followed the steps inclusive institutions. Britain sent convicts to Australia, but
in this country a new system of laws both countries diverged in their political and economic
institutions created accordingly. In Australia they convict they are incentivized to work and
fought them more inclusive economic institutions. These inclusive institutions allowed by the
Industrial Revolution the country began to get rich. In France in order absolutism institutions that
were inclusive and to expand through the French Revolution imposed in the rest of Europe were
created. These changes created inclusive institutions that allowed industrialization is spreading.
The Industrial Revolution also brought consequences in China and Japan, which diverged
through this critical time. While Japanese institutions were in the process of transformation and
the economy had embarked on a path of rapid growth, China forces fighting for institutional
Political and economic institutions persist over time due to the virtuous circle: a powerful
positive feedback process that keeps these institutions against attempts to undermine and set in
motion forces that drive these are even more inclusive. The virtuous circle emerges from
pluralism, the rule of law and inclusive political institutions because they tend to support
inclusive economic institutions. Pluralism also creates a more open system and allows
independent media to flourish, making it easier for groups that have an interest in the
continuation of inclusive institutions and organize awareness against threats to such institutions.
The process creates a vicious circle of negative feedback extractive political institutions
that shape economic institutions that enrich a few who have the resources at the expense of many
and ensuring the continuity of his power and succeed in doing so. Extractive economic
institutions create a basis for the persistence of extractive political institutions. Extractive
political institutions tend to create a vicious circle because they do not provide line of defense
against those who would usurp and to misuse the powers of the State. There is a kind of vicious
circle that leads to the persistence of extractive institutions and the same ruling elites with the