Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Great Depression
Great Depression
CAUSES:
The Great Depression of the late 1920s and ’30s remains the longest and most
severe economic downturn in modern history. Lasting almost 10 years (from late
1929 until about 1939) and affecting nearly every country in the world, it was
marked by steep declines in industrial production and in prices (deflation),
mass unemployment, banking panics, and sharp increases in rates of poverty and
homelessness. In the United States, where the effects of the depression were
generally worst, between 1929 and 1933 industrial production fell nearly 47
percent, gross domestic product (GDP) declined by 30 percent, and unemployment
reached more than 20 percent. By comparison, during the Great Recession of
2007–09, the second largest economic downturn in U.S. history, GDP declined by
4.3 percent, and unemployment reached slightly less than 10 percent.
There is no consensus among economists and historians regarding the exact causes
of the Great Depression. However, many scholars agree that at least the following
four factors played a role.
Banking panics and monetary contraction. Between 1930 and 1932 the United
States experienced four extended banking panics, during which large numbers of
bank customers, fearful of their bank’s solvency, simultaneously attempted to
withdraw their deposits in cash. Ironically, the frequent effect of a banking panic is
to bring about the very crisis that panicked customers aim to protect themselves
against: even financially healthy banks can be ruined by a large panic. By 1933
one-fifth of the banks in existence in 1930 had failed, leading the new Franklin D.
Roosevelt administration to declare a four-day “bank holiday” (later extended by
three days), during which all of the country’s banks remained closed until they
could prove their solvency to government inspectors. The natural consequence of
widespread bank failures was to decrease consumer spending and business
investment, because there were fewer banks to lend money. There was also less
money to lend, partly because people were hoarding it in the form of cash.
According to some scholars, that problem was exacerbated by the Federal Reserve,
which raised interest rates (further depressing lending) and deliberately reduced
the money supply in the belief that doing so was necessary to maintain the gold
standard (see below), by which the U.S. and many other countries had tied the
value of their currencies to a fixed amount of gold. The reduced money supply in
turn reduced prices, which further discouraged lending and investment (because
people feared that future wages and profits would not be sufficient to cover loan
payments).
The gold standard. Whatever its effects on the money supply in the United States,
the gold standard unquestionably played a role in the spread of the Great Depression
from the United States to other countries. As the United States experienced declining
output and deflation, it tended to run a trade surplus with other countries because
Americans were buying fewer imported goods, while American exports were
relatively cheap. Such imbalances gave rise to significant foreign gold outflows to the
United States, which in turn threatened to devalue the currencies of the countries
whose gold reserves had been depleted. Accordingly, foreign central banks attempted
to counteract the trade imbalance by raising their interest rates, which had the effect of
reducing output and prices and increasing unemployment in their countries. The
resulting international economic decline, especially in Europe, was nearly as bad as
that in the United States.
Decreased international lending and tariffs. In the late 1920s, while the U.S.
economy was still expanding, lending by U.S. banks to foreign countries fell, partly
because of relatively high U.S. interest rates. The drop-off contributed to
contractionary effects in some borrower countries, particularly Germany, Argentina,
and Brazil, whose economies entered a downturn even before the beginning of the
Great Depression in the United States. Meanwhile, American agricultural interests,
suffering because of overproduction and increased competition from European and
other agricultural producers, lobbied Congress for passage of new tariffs on
agricultural imports. Congress eventually adopted broad legislation, the Smoot-
Hawley Tariff Act (1930), that imposed steep tariffs (averaging 20 percent) on a wide
range of agricultural and industrial products. The legislation naturally provoked
retaliatory measures by several other countries, the cumulative effect of which was
declining output in several countries and a reduction in global trade.
Just as there is no general agreement about the causes of the Great Depression, there is
no consensus about the sources of recovery, though, again, a few factors played an
obvious role. In general, countries that abandoned the gold standard or devalued their
currencies or otherwise increased their money supply recovered first (Britain
abandoned the gold standard in 1931, and the United States effectively devalued its
currency in 1933). Fiscal expansion, in the form of New Deal jobs and social welfare
programs and increased defense spending during the onset of World War II,
presumably also played a role by increasing consumers’ income and aggregate
demand, but the importance of this factor is a matter of debate among scholars.
NEW DEAL : Historians debating the New Deal have generally been
divided between liberals who support it, conservatives who oppose it, and
some New Left historians who complain it was too favourable to capitalism and
did too little for minorities. There is consensus on only a few points, with most
commentators favourable toward the CCC and hostile toward the NRA.
Consensus historians of the 1950s, such as Richard Hofstadter, according to May:
Believed that the prosperity and apparent class harmony of the post-World War II
era reflected a return to the true Americanism rooted in liberal capitalism and the
pursuit of individual opportunity that had made fundamental conflicts over
resources a thing of the past. They argued that the New Deal was a conservative
movement that built a welfare state, guided by experts, that saved rather than
transformed liberal capitalism
While anything is possible, it's unlikely to happen again. Central banks around the
world, including the Federal Reserve, have learned from the past. There are better
safeguards in place to protect against catastrophe, and developments in monetary
policy help manage the economy. The Great Recession, for instance, had a
significantly smaller impact.1 6
But monetary policy can't offset fiscal policy. Some argue that the sizes of the U.S.
national debt and the current account deficit could trigger an economic crisis.
Experts also predict that climate change could cause profound losses.1 7