Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finance Management
Finance Management
Advantages of Wealth Maximization Model- The wealth maximization model is superior because it
obviates all the drawbacks of profit maximization as a goal of a financial decision.
Firstly, wealth maximization is based on cash flows and not on profits. Unlike the profits,
cash flows are exact and definite and therefore avoid any ambiguity associated with
accounting profits. Profit can easily be manipulative, and if there is a change in accounting
assumption/policy, there is a change in profit. There is a change in the depreciation method;
there is a change in profit. It is not the case in the case of Cash flows.
Secondly, profit maximization presents a shorter-term view as compared to wealth
maximization. Short-term profit maximization can be achieved by the managers at the cost of
the long-term sustainability of the business.
Thirdly, wealth maximization considers the time value of money. It is important as we know
that a dollar today and a dollar one year later will not have the same value. In wealth
maximization, the future cash flows are discounted at an appropriate discounted rate to
represent their present value. Suppose there are two projects, A and B. Project A is more
profitable; however, it will generate profit over a long period of time, while project B is less
profitable however it can generate a return in a shorter period. In a situation of uncertainty,
project B may be preferable. So, profit maximization ignores the timing of returns and
considers wealth maximization.
Receiving a fixed rate of dividend, out of the net profits of the company, before any dividend
is declared for equity shareholders.
Preference over equity shareholders in receiving their capital after the claims of the
company's creditors have been settled, at the time of liquidation.
In case of dissolution of the company, preference share capital is refunded prior to the refund
of equity share capital.
Participative preference shares refer to a type of shares that give the shareholders the right to
participate in the company’s profits and assets in excess of the stated rate of dividend. Simply
put, the holders of such shares receive their regular dividends in addition to a share in the
company’s profits after the payments of ordinary shareholders, usually proportional to their
investment. Participative preference shares also give the holders voting rights in significant
company decisions and are often issued to long-term investors or stakeholder groups.
7- Difference between convertible and Warrant?
Warrants
Warrants are a type of security that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy
shares of stock at a set price within a certain period of time. Warrants are typically issued by
companies as a way to raise capital. For example, a company might issue warrants to
investors in exchange for an investment in the company. Warrants are similar to options, but
there are some key differences. First, warrants are typically issued by the company itself,
while options are typically issued by investors. Second, warrants are often attached to debt,
meaning that if the company goes bankrupt, the warrants will still be valid. Options, on the
other hand, are not typically attached to debt and will become worthless if the company goes
bankrupt.
Convertible Debt
Convertible debt is a type of security that gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to
convert the debt into shares of stock at a set price within a certain period of time. Convertible
debt is usually issued by investors as a way to hedge their investment. For example, an
investor might buy a bond that is convertible into shares of stock. If the stock price goes up,
the investor can convert the bond into shares and make a profit. If the stock price goes down,
the investor can hold on to the bond and wait for the price to rebound. Convertible debt is
similar to warrants, but there are some key differences. First, convertible debt is typically
issued by investors, while warrants are typically issued by companies. Second, convertible
debt is often attached to equity, meaning that if the company goes bankrupt, the debt will be
converted into shares of stock. Warrants, on the other hand, are not typically attached to
equity and will become worthless if the company goes bankrupt.
ADRs can be found on many exchanges in the U.S. including the New York Stock Exchange
and Nasdaq as well as over-the-counter (OTC). Foreign companies and their depositary bank
intermediaries must comply with all U.S. laws for issuing ADRs. This makes ADRs subject to
U.S. securities laws as well as the rules of exchanges. ADRs are alternative investments that
include additional risks that should be thoroughly analysed by American investors.
Hypothetically, an investor could choose to broaden their investing universe by choosing to
consider ADRs. ADRs ultimately increase the investment options for U.S. investors. They
can also simplify international investing by providing the offering to U.S. investors through
U.S. market exchanges. For U.S. investors, ADRs can have some unique risks. Primarily the
risk of currency found in conversion with the payment of dividends. Otherwise, ADRs are
denominated in U.S. dollars but their initial offering value is based on a valuation that is
created in terms of their home currency.
9- Concept of present value, Future Value, Time Value?
Present value (PV) is the concept that states an amount of money today is worth more than
that same amount in the future. In other words, money received in the future is not worth as
much as an equal amount received today.
Receiving $1,000 today is worth more than $1,000 five years from now.
Future value (FV) is a financial concept that assigns a value to an asset based on estimated
variables such as future interest rates or cash-flows. It may be useful for an investor to know
how much their investment may be in five years given an expected rate of return. This
concept of taking the investment value today, applying expected growth, and calculating
what the investment will be in the future is future value.
The time value of money is a basic financial concept that holds that money in the present is
worth more than the same sum of money to be received in the future. This is true because
money that you have right now can be invested and earn a return, thus creating a larger
amount of money in the future. (Also, with future money, there is the additional risk that the
money may never actually be received, for one reason or another). The time value of money
is sometimes referred to as the net present value (NPV) of money.
10- Difference between present value and Future Value?
As part of capital budgeting, a company might assess a prospective project's lifetime cash
inflows and outflows to determine whether the potential returns it would generate meet a sufficient
target benchmark. The capital budgeting process is also known as investment appraisal.
12- NPV, IRR, Annual rate of Return, payback period?
The internal rate of return (IRR) is a metric used in financial analysis to estimate the
profitability of potential investments. IRR is a discount rate that makes the net present value
(NPV) of all cash flows equal to zero in a discounted cash flow analysis.
IRR calculations rely on the same formula as NPV does. Keep in mind that IRR is not the
actual dollar value of the project. It is the annual return that makes the NPV equal to zero.
Generally speaking, the higher an internal rate of return, the more desirable an investment is
to undertake. IRR is uniform for investments of varying types and, as such, can be used to
rank multiple prospective investments or projects on a relatively even basis. In general, when
comparing investment options with other similar characteristics, the investment with the
highest IRR probably would be considered the best.
Net present value (NPV) is a financial metric that seeks to capture the total value of an
investment opportunity. The idea behind NPV is to project all of the future cash inflows and
outflows associated with an investment, discount all those future cash flows to the present
day, and then add them together. The resulting number after adding all the positive and
negative cash flows together is the investment’s NPV. A positive NPV means that, after
accounting for the time value of money, you will make money if you proceed with the
investment.
For example, assume that an asset returned 50% in three years and another has returned 85%
in 5 years. With this data, it can be complex to understand which asset yielded better returns
until we scale and determine which asset delivered a higher rate of return.
Payback period is defined as the number of years required to recover the original cash
investment. In other words, it is the period of time at the end of which a machine, facility, or
other investment has produced sufficient net revenue to recover its investment costs .
13- Why capital budgeting is used?
Capital budgeting is used for the following reasons:
To estimate the future cash flows: Capital budgeting helps businesses to estimate the future
cash flows associated with an investment opportunity. By forecasting the future cash inflows
and outflows, businesses can calculate the expected return on investment, payback period,
and other financial metrics.
To reduce risk: Capital budgeting also helps businesses to identify and reduce risks
associated with a particular project. By evaluating the potential risks, businesses can adopt
strategies to mitigate them, which in turn, reduces the overall risk exposure.
To allocate resources efficiently: Capital budgeting helps businesses in identifying the most
profitable investment opportunities. It allows them to allocate limited resources efficiently
and maximize their returns.
Minimizing Risk: Capital budgeting helps to minimize the risk associated with investing in
long-term projects by analysing the potential risks and uncertainties.
Maintaining Market Share: Capital budgeting helps an organization to maintain its market
share by investing in new projects that will help it to compete effectively with its rivals.
LEVERAGE
1- Meaning of leverage and its types?
The term ‘leverage’ is used to describe the ability of a firm to use fixed cost assets or
funds to increase the return to its equity shareholders. In other words, leverage is the
employment of fixed assets or funds for which a firm has to meet fixed costs or fixed
rate of interest obligation—irrespective of the level of activities attained, or the level
of operating profit earned. Leverage occurs in varying degrees. The higher the degree
of leverage, the higher is the risk involved in meeting fixed payment obligations i.e.,
operating fixed costs and cost of debt capital. But, at the same time, higher risk
profile increases the possibility of higher rate of return to the shareholders.
Types of Leverage:
(i) Operating leverage (ii) Financial leverage and (iii) Combined leverage
Operating Leverage: Operating leverage refers to the use of fixed operating costs such as
depreciation, insurance of assets, repairs and maintenance, property taxes etc. in the
operations of a firm. But it does not include interest on debt capital. Higher the proportion of
fixed operating cost as compared to variable cost, higher is the operating leverage, and vice
versa. Operating leverage may be defined as the “firm’s ability to use fixed operating cost to
magnify effects of changes in sales on its earnings before interest and taxes.”
Financial Leverage: Financial leverage is primarily concerned with the financial activities
which involve raising of funds from the sources for which a firm has to bear fixed charges
such as interest expenses, loan fees etc. These sources include long-term debt (i.e.,
debentures, bonds etc.) and preference share capital. Long term debt capital carries a
contractual fixed rate of interest and its payment is obligatory irrespective of the fact whether
the firm earns a profit or not. As debt providers have prior claim on income and assets of a
firm over equity shareholders, their rate of interest is generally lower than the expected return
in equity shareholders. Further, interest on debt capital is a tax deductible expense. These two
facts lead to the magnification of the rate of return on equity share capital and hence earnings
per share. Thus, the effect of changes in operating profits or EBIT on the earnings per share is
The key to successful application of trading on equity is to ensure that the returns
from the investment are higher than the cost of borrowing. This can be calculated by
comparing the internal rate of return (IRR) on the investment against the cost of
borrowing.
Expansion of a product line or business operations: A business can use the funds
generated by trading on equity to expand operations, such as launching new products or
expanding into new markets.
Acquisition of other businesses: A business can use the funds generated from trading on
equity to acquire other businesses, which can help increase its market share or support its
long-term objectives.
Investment in research and development: Trading on equity can provide a business with
the funds to invest in research and development, which can help it to improve its products
and services, leading to increased revenue and profitability.
1. Human factors: These include the actions of employees, suppliers, and contractors.
Employee errors and negligence, supplier disruptions, and safety hazards can all contribute to
operating risk.
2. Natural disasters: Natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, and wildfires
can disrupt operations, damage equipment, and cause significant loss of property and life.
4. Regulatory compliance: Non-compliance with laws and regulations can result in fines,
legal action, and reputational damage.
Financial risk refers to the risk of loss resulting from adverse movements in market prices,
exchange rates, interest rates, credit risk, and liquidity risk. Factors that contribute to financial
risk include:
1. Market risk: This arises from changes in market prices or interest rates and affects
financial assets such as stocks, bonds, and foreign exchange.
2. Credit risk: This refers to the risk of loss arising from the failure of a borrower to repay a
loan or meet their obligations.
3. Liquidity risk: This is the risk that an asset cannot be sold quickly enough to meet financial
obligations.
4. Interest rate risk: This refers to the risk of changes in interest rates affecting the value of
investments, debts, and cash holdings.
5. Foreign exchange risk: This is the risk of loss resulting from changes in exchange rates
between currencies used in international trade.
On the other hand, the net income approach in capital structure suggests that the capital structure
affects the company's net income. It maintains that the optimal capital structure is one that maximizes
the company's earnings per share (EPS) and, therefore its stock prices.
Both M.M theory and the net income approach provide a perspective on the impact of capital structure
on firms. Whereas the M.M theory implies that the capital structure is irrelevant, the net income
approach recommends that the capital structure is important and affects the earnings of the company.