Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Court 3 - Miss. Farzana

    Uploaded by

    Pankaj Patil
    18 views1 page
    Miss Farzana Khan, a famous film actress, was gang raped in Hinia by several policemen while there for a film shoot. She was tricked and raped at an isolated place on February 5th, 2014 around 1 AM. A medical examination confirmed the gang rape. The police were able to arrest the culprits after 72 hours. The government constituted a special court which found the men guilty of gang rape and sentenced them to life imprisonment. However, Farzana filed a writ petition against the government of Hinia under Article 21, arguing they should be held vicariously liable under Article 300 of the constitution. The government argued they cannot be held liable further since the culprits were already punished. The Supreme Court

    Original Description:

    Moot court problem

    Original Title

    Court_3-_Miss._Farzana

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Miss Farzana Khan, a famous film actress, was gang raped in Hinia by several policemen while there for a film shoot. She was tricked and raped at an isolated place on February 5th, 2014 around 1 AM. A medical examination confirmed the gang rape. The police were able to arrest the culprits after 72 hours. The government constituted a special court which found the men guilty of gang rape and sentenced them to life imprisonment. However, Farzana filed a writ petition against the government of Hinia under Article 21, arguing they should be held vicariously liable under Article 300 of the constitution. The government argued they cannot be held liable further since the culprits were already punished. The Supreme Court

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    18 views1 page

    Court 3 - Miss. Farzana

    Uploaded by

    Pankaj Patil
    Miss Farzana Khan, a famous film actress, was gang raped in Hinia by several policemen while there for a film shoot. She was tricked and raped at an isolated place on February 5th, 2014 around 1 AM. A medical examination confirmed the gang rape. The police were able to arrest the culprits after 72 hours. The government constituted a special court which found the men guilty of gang rape and sentenced them to life imprisonment. However, Farzana filed a writ petition against the government of Hinia under Article 21, arguing they should be held vicariously liable under Article 300 of the constitution. The government argued they cannot be held liable further since the culprits were already punished. The Supreme Court

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Moot Court No 3

    Date: October 19, 2016 Time: 10Am

    Nature: The Constitution of Hinia Article 21

    Case Name / Topic: Miss Farzana v/s Peoples Republic of Hinia

    Facts: Miss Farzana Khan is a very famous film actress. Farzana happened to come to Hinia
    in connection with the shooting of a film, and was Gang raped by them.

    Moot Court Logic: On 5th Feb 2014 about 1 AM. Three- four Policemen trick and deceived
    Miss Farzana at an isolated place, where she was Gang raped.

    Upon the medical examination, she was confirmed that she was gang raped. Police were able
    to nab the culprits after 72 hours. Government of Hinia, constituted a special court found
    them guilty of gang rape, sentenced them for life imprisonment.

    Farzana has filed a writ petition against Govt. Of Hinia under Article 21. She also contends
    that Govt. Of Hinia has to be held Vicarious liable under Article 300 of Constitution.

    Defendant or Government: As Govt. has already punished all culprits; further state cannot be
    held any vicarious liability. By way of Inter Alia contends that writ under Article 21, is not
    maintainable for recovering monetary compensation.

    Final Judgment: The Supreme Court gave orders to protect life and personal liberty and
    compensation for damages under Article 21 of the Constitution of each and every Foreign
    Tourist/ Visitors.

    You might also like