Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chamber of Horrors
Chamber of Horrors
Viola Li
Academic Writing 5
03/27/22
Chamber of Horrors
Chamber of Horrors
What defines bad design? The Chamber of Horrors which displayed in the Great
Exhibition by sir Henry Cole answered the question in 1851.1 The exhibition was
aimed to show people what are the “good tastes”. However, designs and aesthetics
been changed over 200 years, and the purpose of my exhibition of Chamber of
Horrors would be showing the beauty of imperfection. Although designs had been
improved over these years since more people have the chance to concern art, bad
The Chamber of Horrors was designed during the industry revolution in 1851. In that
period, sir Henry Cole decided to built an exhibition that displays designs which did
not reach Henry Cole’s aesthetic standards.2 His purpose was to make an
public’s good aesthetic. However, it’s not a long term solution by only displays them
1“V&a · Building the Museum.” n.d. Victoria and Albert Museum. https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/
building-the-museum#slideshow=31131014&slide=0.
2 “V&a · Building the Museum.”
Li 2
The first design I chose to displays on my Chamber of Horror is the table lamp from
Henry Cole’s selection. I think the design can be described as a good design instead
of a chamber of horror. Cole made a comment on the table lamp in a museum label.
The label of the object made my Cole said “This table lamp is also dismissed as being
There are still people who like artificial flowers because they made us appreciate the
flower itself without worrying about the withered flowers. The designer perfectly
imitated the flower in nature and used some design method that makes the table lamp
looks like a flower. The color selection is also perfectly matched with the blue and
gold colors, and I think they made the design elegant and graceful. In conclusion, I
think the design of the table lamp is fine because the “imitation of nature” is not an
“unfitness of purpose”.
The second one is an over-decorated Turkey wine bottle from my classmate Kuan-Yu
Lee. Although there’re too many strange decorations on it, we can still find a sense of
beauty of the wine bottle. He made a comment which is “This is the gypsum wine
bottle from Turkey, it is look like a coral or king oyster mushrooms. This objects
meets the Cole's false principle of lack of symmetry, formless confusion, disregard
for structural form, and concentration on the superficial aspects of the design. The
overall bottle has been carved with the complex pattern and shapes that representing
Turkey culture. The shape of the bottle was disorderly, and it's difficult for people to
Li 3
understand it's a wine bottle. The bottle has too much emphasis on its surface by
complicate carving.”4 I agree with him that the design is too complex and the
distorted shape made the bottle looks strange, but it provides a sense of Turkey style
that you can not feel in any other design. The imperfection of the bottle’s shape
happens to be the feeling of a natural object, and I can see it is handmade rather than
a general design.
Last object is a cup that looks like a frog from Karin Shibuya. It’s also showed us the
beauty of imperfection in a cute way. Her comment for the cup is “This is a cup in the
shape of frog. I made this works of pottery when I was 8 years old in elementary
is not symmetrical. When I put this cup on the desk, the cup is wobbly and unstable.
Next, it's appearance confuse its purpose. The opening of this cup is too thick, so it
is hard to drink the water in the cup. Thus, this object meets Cole’s False
Principles for two reasons.”5 I think the cup is attractive in an unusual way. Although
the design was rough and it’s not functional because you can’t drink water by using
the cup, the big two eyeballs that were added on the lid give a visual impact to the
audience and made it looks adorable rather than weird. That is another example of the
beauty of imperfection because it’s would be normal and plain if it was well-designed
and well-colored.
Li 4
Our aesthetics and our points of art are changing nowadays, we should be not used
only one set of standards to evaluate all the designs. I think it would be better to
appreciate imperfection because every work made by designers have their unique