MEGECHA Head WORK (Revised) 2

DATA SHEET FOR CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE USING THE FLOAT GAUGING TECHNIQUE
Enter data in green cells Calculations are performed in yellow cells
Date: Time at start:

Station: Time at end:
Name of site manager:
Start from left bank, divide stream into 5-10 DEPTH at Cross Section Profile 1 (upstream cross
equal sections section)
Total Width (metres): 3

Distance from LB (cm) Water Depth (cm)
0 cm (Left bank) 0 0
20 6
40 13
60 16
80 17
90 17
110 20
130 20
150 19
170 16
190 10
210 7
230 5
(Edge right bank) 250 0
Mean depth (m): 0.12
Area of Cross section profile (m2): 0.36
FLOAT MEASUREMENTS VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 1

Length of reach (metres): 15
Section (as per above) Distance from LB (m) Time (seconds)
0 cm (Left bank) 0 0
20 10.62
40 21.96
60 10.89
80 11.89
90 11.43
110 10.71
130 11.48
150 11.43
170 20.84
190 11.66
(Edge right bank) 210 19.89
Average no of seconds over the reach: 13
Average velocity for measurement 1 (m/s): 1.18
CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE (m3/s) OBSERVATIONS (weather, flow conditions, diffi
Average cross section area: 0.353

Average measured velocity (m/s): 1.18
Velocity coefficient: 0.65
Average channel velocity (m/s): 0.77
Discharge (Flow) (m3/s): 0.700 700.000

Sebate wodel river at febraruy 5/2006
are performed in yellow cells Do not change red cells
Staff Gauge at start:

Staff Gauge at end:
DEPTH at Cross Section Profile 2 (middle cross DEPTH at Cross Section Profile 3 (downstream
section) cross section)
Total Width (metres): 3.2 Total Width (metres): 3.1

Distance from LB (cm) Water Depth (cm) Distance from LB (cm) Water Depth (cm)
0 0 0 0
20 11 20 9
40 18 40 9
60 21 60 6
80 17 80 17
90 22 90 13
110 19 110 18
130 18 130 15
150 14 150 10
170 10 170 8
190 8 190 9
210 8 210 0
230 0 230
250 250
0.13 0.10
0.41 0.29
VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 2 VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 3

15 15
Distance from LB (m) Time (seconds) Distance from LB (m) Time (seconds)
0 0 0 0
20 10.62 20 10.62
40 21.96 40 21.96
60 10.89 60 10.89
80 11.89 80 11.89
90 11.43 90 11.43
110 10.71 110 10.71
130 11.48 130 11.48
150 11.43 150 11.43
170 20.84 170 20.84
190 11.66 190 11.66
210 19.89 210 19.89
13 13
1.18 1.18
ONS (weather, flow conditions, difficulties experienced during measurement)
ls
minimum river bed level 1863
Table: TWD Computation at Wier Axis
AberaChala:
AberaChala:
Stage, H (m) Tail water Manning's Water Wetted Hydraulic Longitudi Velocity, V
From CAD From CAD
depth Roughness, n Area, A primeter, P(m) Radius, R nal Slope, (m/s)
(m2) (m) S (m/m)
1863.000 0.000 0.035 0 0.5 0.00 0.016 0.00

1863.500 0.500 0.035 3.137 11.568 0.27 0.016 1.51
1864.000 1.000 0.035 11.69 20.368 0.57 0.016 2.49
1864.500 1.500 0.035 20.862 20.956 1.00 0.016 3.59
1865.000 2.000 0.035 31.323 22.449 1.40 0.016 4.50
1865.500 2.500 0.035 42.825 23.906 1.79 0.016 5.32
1866.000 3.000 0.035 54.409 25.339 2.15 0.016 6.00
1866.500 3.500 0.035 66.504 28 2.38 0.016 6.42
1867.000 4.000 0.035 78.991 30 2.63 0.016 6.87
Abera:
1867.500 Top4.500
of bank 0.035 92.45 32 2.89 0.016 7.31
1868.000 5.000 0.035 110 34 3.24 0.016 7.89
INTERPOLAT FOR QD Tell water depth Velocity

676.10 1867.500 676.10 4.500 676.103 7.31
852.7 1867.961 852.7 4.961 852.700 7.842047 3.17288991
867.50 1868.000 867.50 5.000 867.501 7.89
1872
MAX 852.70
1870
1868
1866
1864
1862
1860
1858
0 10
AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE

ACCUMU
LATIVE
CH ELV PD HEIGHT Total area Hav Iav
1865
0 1864.728 0 0 0 0
1.335 1864.66 1 0.068 0.05
2.744 1864.513 1 0.147 0.24
f(x) = − 0.035320
4.903 1864.318 2 0.195 0.55 1864
5 1864.308 0 0.01 0.12
6.893 1864.144 2 0.164 0.57
8.302 1864.078 1 0.066 0.36
1863
10 1863.913 2 0.165 0.86
10.643 1863.851 1 0.062 0.41
12.282 1863.692 2 0.159 1.01 1.232545 0.016
13.958 1863.592 2 0.1 0.78 1862
15 1863.555 1 0.037 0.33
16.185 1863.536 1 0.019 0.17
18.598 1863.531 2 0.005 0.06
19.775 1863.44 1 0.091 0.90 1861
20 1863.421 0 0.019 0.24
22.589 1863.365 3 0.056 0.64
25 1863.311 2 0.054 0.70
1860
25.573 1863.298 3 0.067 0.88
30 1863.255 4 0.043 0.68
30.458 1863.25 0 0.005 0.10
32.871 1863.213 2 0.037 0.61
35 1863.202 2 0.011 0.21
39.007 1863.15 4 0.052 1.02
40 1863.05 1 0.1 2.03
42.348 1863 2 0.05 1.11
45 1862.85 3 0.15 3.40
48.615 1862.65 4 0.2 4.94
50 1862.57 1 0.08 2.10
53.194 1862.4 3 0.17 4.56
55 1862.31 2 0.09 2.56
58.076 1862.18 3 0.13 3.82
59.909 1862.165 2 0.015 0.51
65 1862.05 5 0.115 3.75
70 1862 5 0.05 1.81
75 1861.85 5 0.15 5.65
77.41 77.41 2.93 47.71
TWD at Wier Site
Discharge, 1,869.0
Q (m3/s)
1,868.0
0.00 0.01 1,867.0

4.74
1,866.0
29.11
74.99 1,865.0
Stage, H (m)
141.01
227.73 1,864.0
326.48
426.82 1,863.0
543.02
1,862.0
676.10 0.0604
867.50 3.1544 1,861.0
1,860.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Discharge, Q (m3/s)
1867
4
8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Column X
-12
4
1865 AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE
0 50
f(x) = − 0.0353201698824484 x + 1864.33694594551

1864
AXIS(1999.8 @ 65m
1863
1862
1861
1860
AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE
Linear (AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE)
No. PVI Station PVI ElevationGrade In Grade Out A (Grade Change) Profile Cur Sub-Entity Profile Cur
1 0.85 1999.058m 90.79%
2 0.86 1999.068m 90.79% 90.79% 0.00%
3 0.86 1999.069m 90.79% -26.44% 117.22%
4 1.11 1999.003m -26.44% -26.44% 0.00%
5 1.12 1999.000m -26.44% -9.77% 16.67%
6 10.87 1998.047m -9.77% -2.17% 7.59%
7 11.06 1998.043m -2.17% 1.08% 3.26%
8 11.49 1998.048m 1.08% 13.54% 12.45%
9 11.87 1998.099m 13.54% 20.85% 7.31%
10 12.09 1998.146m 20.85% 12.83% 8.02%
11 12.2 1998.160m 12.83% 12.41% 0.42%
12 13.15 1998.278m 12.41% 12.91% 0.50%
100 0+80.94m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
101 0+81.08m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
102 0+81.36m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
103 0+81.45m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
104 0+81.59m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
105 0+82.05m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
106 0+82.57m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
107 0+83.69m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
108 0+84.80m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
109 0+85.76m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
110 0+85.92m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
111 0+86.68m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
112 0+87.04m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
113 0+87.59m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
114 0+87.86m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
115 0+88.15m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
116 0+88.33m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
117 0+88.89m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
118 0+89.27m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
119 0+90.39m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
120 0+91.15m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
121 0+91.28m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
122 0+91.29m 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
123 0+91.33m 1998.000m 0.00% 30.35% 30.35%
124 0+91.51m 1998.053m 30.35% 31.76% 1.41%
125 0+92.34m 1998.317m 31.76% 11.88% 19.88%
126 0+92.62m 1998.351m 11.88% 34.52% 22.64%
127 0+92.86m 1998.431m 34.52% 30.39% 4.13%
128 0+93.01m 1998.478m 30.39% 36.79% 6.39%
129 0+94.43m 1999.000m 36.79% 0.00% 36.79%
130 0+94.94m 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
131 0+96.29m 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
132 0+96.43m 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
133 0+96.51m 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
134 0+96.52m 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
135 0+96.61m 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
136 0+96.62m 1999.000m 0.00% 24.01% 24.01%
137 0+96.95m 1999.077m 24.01% 11.47% 12.54%
138 0+97.02m 1999.085m 11.47% 14.67% 3.20%
139 0+97.13m 1999.103m 14.67% 22.73% 8.06%
140 0+97.53m 1999.193m 22.73% 16.46% 6.26%
141 0+97.55m 1999.196m 16.46% 25.34% 8.88%
142 100.72 2000.000m 25.34% 0.00% 25.34%
143 1000.8 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
144 100.92 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
145 101.14 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
146 101.21 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
147 1001.27 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
148 1001.57 2000.000m 0.00% 11.75% 11.75%
149 1001.66 2000.010m 11.75% 12.89% 1.14%
150 1002.76 2000.153m 12.89% 15.12% 2.23%
151 1003.23 2000.223m 15.12% 2.78% 12.33%
152 1003.51 2000.231m 2.78% -2.16% 4.95%
153 1003.87 2000.223m -2.16% -0.10% 2.07%
154 1003.88 2000.223m -0.10% 11.81% 11.91%
155 1004.16 2000.256m 11.81% -6.17% 17.98%
156 1004.98 2000.205m -6.17% -3.59% 2.57%
157 1005.85 2000.174m -3.59% -6.37% 2.78%
158 1006.08 2000.159m -6.37% -3.83% 2.54%
159 1006.72 2000.135m -3.83% -6.45% 2.62%
160 1007.18 2000.105m -6.45% -13.69% 7.24%
161 1007.19 2000.103m -13.69% -10.83% 2.85%
162 1008.14 2000.000m -10.83% 0.00% 10.83%
163 1008.3 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
164 1009.4 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
165 1009.83 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
166 1009.91 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
167 1010.51 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
168 1011.62 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
169 1011.93 2000.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
170 1012 2000.000m 0.00% -12.38% 12.38%
171 1014.61 1999.678m -12.38% -1.90% 10.48%
172 1017.61 1999.621m -1.90% -40.31% 38.41%
173 1018.02 1999.454m -40.31% -33.27% 7.04%
174 1018.26 1999.375m -33.27% -18.22% 15.06%
175 1018.4 1999.350m -18.22% -21.75% 3.53%
176 1020 1999.000m -21.75% 0.00% 21.75%
177 1020.62 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
178 1020.9 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
179 1020.97 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
180 1021.25 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
181 1026.14 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
182 1027.14 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
183 1027.39 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
184 1027.91 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
185 1028.15 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
186 1029.15 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
187 1029.34 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
188 1030.02 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
189 1030.15 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
190 1031.15 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
191 1032.15 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
192 1032.84 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
193 1033.15 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
194 1033.17 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
195 1034.15 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
196 1037.45 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
197 1039.33 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
198 1039.63 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
199 1041.23 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
200 1044.01 1999.000m 0.00% 6.75% 6.75%
201 1047.03 1999.203m 6.75% 5.28% 1.47%
202 1048.52 1999.282m 5.28% 4.71% 0.57%
203 1052.86 1999.487m 4.71% 4.74% 0.03%
204 1058.69 1999.763m 4.74% 2.95% 1.79%
205 1065.61 1999.967m 2.95% 0.20% 2.75%
206 1065.85 1999.968m 0.20% -16.58% 16.79%
207 1065.96 1999.949m -16.58% -7.91% 8.68%
208 1069.71 1999.653m -7.91% -4.51% 3.40%
209 1071 1999.595m -4.51% -4.51% 0.00%
210 1073 1999.504m -4.51% -34.44% 29.93%
211 1073.99 1999.161m -34.44% -23.52% 10.92%
212 1074.25 1999.103m -23.52% -34.13% 10.61%
213 1074.55 1999.000m -34.13% 0.00% 34.13%
214 1074.77 1999.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
215 1074.78 1999.000m 0.00% -28.10% 28.10%
216 1076.76 1998.444m -28.10% -26.94% 1.15%
217 1078.4 1998.000m -26.94% 0.00% 26.94%
218 1078.56 1998.000m 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
219 1078.93 1998.000m 0.00% -19.14% 19.14%
220 180.01 1997.794m -19.14% -28.16% 9.01%
221 1080.71 1997.596m -28.16% -19.72% 8.43%
222 1081.74 1997.393m -19.72% -23.21% 3.49%
223 1082.08 1997.314m -23.21% -20.38% 2.83%
224 1082.64 1997.200m -20.38% -5.63% 14.75%
225 1082.93 1997.184m -5.63% -5.17% 0.46%
226 1083.54 1997.152m -5.17% 6.06%
0.55%
D at Wier Site
DI EL
0 1869.747
3.646 1868.909
4.906 1868.716
5 1868.705
6.981 1868.472
8.974 1868.202
10 1868.062
11.549 1867.559
12.954 1866.452
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 14.014 1865.598
Discharge, Q (m3/s) 15 1864.812
16.004 1864.109
17.997 1863.768
19.769 1863.635
20 1863.618
23.28 1863.376
25 1863.251
26.09 1863.177
28.11 1863.332
30 1863.517
30.803 1863.596
32.559 1863.769
33.846 1863.895
35 1864.018
35.068 1864.079
36.356 1865.512
37.878 1866.526
40 1866.92
42.583 1867.42
44.456 1867.92
45 1867.981
47.275 1868.3
50 1869
55 1869.5
100
OPE)
K Value Curve RadiAsymmetricAsymmetricLock

0.055
TOTAL
COMMAND DUTY(L/ Depth of Depth of
AREA(HEC) S/HEC) Q(L/S) Q(m3/S) water(m) canal(m) COMMAND AREA
LS 1000 1.25 1250 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.2 LS
TOTAL 1000 3 3000 1.25
Q 30%Q Com
273 81.9 152.88 191.1
Design of Main canal (left side canal )based on Manning's equation

Masonry lined
GIVEN : Q = 1025.000
b/d = 2
m= 0 d
n= 0.018
So = 0.0005
Assume d= 1.00 b
b= 2.00
Calculate A=b*d+md^2 2.000

P=b+2d(1+m^2)^0.5 4.000
R =A/P 0.500
Required
V=1/n*(R)^2/3*(So)^0.5 0.783 discharge =
Q =A*V 1.565 1025.0000
Assumed free board
F= 0.2000
Summary of design parameters
Side slope = 0
Bed slope = 0.05%
Depth of flow = 1.00
Bottom width = 2.00
Depth of canal = 1.20
COMMAND AREA
38.92
38.92
PART-1. WEIR HEIGHT DETERMINA
NO REQUIRED DATA
1 Minimum river bed level=
river bed level=
2 Water depth in the canal(LEFT SIDE MC) = DLS
3 length of main canal from the head regulator to the 1st off-take(LEFT SIDE)
4 Bed slope of the main canal(left side), S (LS)
5 Peak irrigable land level in the command area(LS)
6 Tell water level from rating curve for Q D,TWD
7 Design discharge from perivious QD =
8 Head loss across head regulator =
9 Head loss at the Turn out =
10 Operational head losses
Head loss along
11
Left side MC, hf=
12 Thus tell water depth (TWD) in meter
OUT PUT
1 Weir Crest Level (WCL)=
2 Bottom intake level=Max. command level + HL along MC(LEFT SIDE)
3 Weir Height considering Left side command=
KIYA:
Avaliable driving head (for left side Main canal) = Minimum driving head for
4 full supply discharge should
be > 0.15m
Minimum driving head for LS main Canal full supply discharge
5 KIYA:
PART-2. DISCHARGE COOFICIENT DETER
IF > than flow depth in MC
thus the discharge can be
drived, so take calculated
SELECTION OF WEIR TYPE:-The weir type is selected from Hdifferent angles.Some of t
availability,foundation of the seat,height of the weir,the transported materials during flood time, Con
2 ogee type constructed as cyclyopean concrete with proper capping of reinforced concrete. In this pro
and the abutments.
REQUIRED DATA
3 C (for ogee crested weir) from tabel =
4 Top width of existing river=
5 N(no divide wall)
6 Thickness off D.wall(t)
7 Pier(divide wall) Condition (Kp) from tabel
8 Abutument Condition(Ka)
9 Weir Height considering Left side command=
10 Design discharge from perivious QD =
11 Upstream water depth P= (RBL-WCL)
OUT PUT
The depth of approach head (weir height/head of water above the crest i.e. h/Hd) and submergence need to b
applied for the assumed coefficient of discharge or not.
12 Total head over the crust = QD = CLHe3/2 FROM WHICH >> He = (QD/CL)2/3
13 He = Hd+Hav; Hav=Va2/2g where Va
=Q/A = QD/(L*(h+Hd)) therefor He
=Hd+(QD/(L*(h+Hd)))^2/2g
He = Hd+Hav; Hav=Va2/2g where Va
=Q/A = QD/(L*(h+Hd)) therefor He
14
=Hd+(QD/(L*(h+Hd)))^2/2g
15
Hd =
16 Check effect of height of spillway on……………………….…... Cd=(H/H d)
17 C is affected by depth of aproach ……………and Cd =
Effective length of the designed weir dimension………………………………..
18 (Le) = L-2*[N*Kp+Ka]*He
Trail-1 Le =
KIYA:
He = If < 1.33 it is a low spill
Trail-2 Le = way, so the effect of depth
of approach on discharge
He = cofficient is not negligibel
Trail-3 Le = and c=0.72
19 Check for velocity head (Ha) =Ha =V2/2g where

V = Qd/A….. that is …………….Qd/(L+N*t)*(H+He)
Ha=
Check for D/S approne effect
D/S submergenc effect(Hd+H/He) = (He+H)/He
Check for D/S submerjence effect
D/S submergenc effect(h/He) = (He+H-d)/He
KIYA:
PART-3. CHECK FOR
any impact AFLUX
If it is very small it have not
so neglect
20 U/s HFL = U/s bed level +weir height+Hd
KIYA:
21 U/s TEL =U/s HFL +approach velocity head (Hd+d)/He = (He+h)/He >
22 D/s HFL=River bed +Tail water depth 1.7 for no submergenc i.e
the "Cd" is not affected by
23 D/s TEL=D/sHFL+V22/2g, tell water condition
24 Aproachi Velocity head = Ha =V22/2g
25 D/s TEL=
26 Aflux
PART-4. WEIR PROFILE DETERMINA

REQUIRED DATA
Selected weir Type = Vertical Ogee weir
K
n
Hd = He =
Down stream slope =H : V 0.8

(Dy/Dx) =
OUT PUT
20 4.1. determination of D/S face

Down stream profile Xn = K* Hdn-1*Y
X1.85 =2*Hd0.85*Y
Y =X1.85/2*Hd0.85
Y =X1.85/2*3.7130.85
Y =X1.85/6.09
dy/dx(X1.85/6.09) =
1.85*X1.85-1/6.09
1.85*X0.85/6.09
Goal seek
X=
Y=
x 0 0.594
y 0 0.0545241413009798
0 -0.0545241413009798
21 Up stream profile determination……………. Y =((0.724(X+0.27*Hd)1.85)/(Hd0.85))+0.126Hd-0.
The U/S profile extend up to X=-0.27Hd =

Y=
4.2. determination of U/S face

X 0 -0.236151041759119
Y 0 0.0164020153286212
0 -0.0164020153286212
4.3. determination Rivers curve

22
D/S riverse curve ditermination Hd =
Ro = 0.305*10 k
K = (V+6.4Hd+4.88)/(3.6Hd+19.5)
V = (2g(H+0.5Hd)0.5
PART-5. HYDRAULIC JUMP DETER

REQUIRED DATA
Up stream river bed level (U/S RBL )=
Weir height (H) =
Weir crest level (WCL) =
Thus tell water depth (TWD) in meter(D=Y2)
Design discharge from perivious QD =
Effective Length Leff =
Down stream river bed level (D/S RBL) =
He =( Q/Cle)2/3
design discharge per meter width (q)
Ha =( Va2/2g) = (Q/Y1)2/2g
Hd
OUT PUT
Trial-1 Applying Bernoulli's Equation b/n u/s and at the toe of spillway >>>> E1=W2
Q =AV1 >> q/Le = AV1 = V1 = q/Y1
H+He = Y1+ (V12/2g)
7.0125 Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g)
GOAL SEEK
Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g) = 7.013
Y1 1.3680
solve by goal seek 7.013
Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

V1 = q/Y1 10.5237907492631
Fr1 = 2.87
Ha1 = 5.6448
from Y1/Y2 = 1/2*(-1+√(1+8F12)
Y2 = 4.92
V2 = 2.929
Ha2 = 0.437
Head loss (HL) = (Y2-Y1)3/(4Y1Y2) 1.660
Difference B/n Y2 AND TWD i.e (Y2-TWD)= KIYA: 0.2156 KIYA:
If d = d2-d3 = 0.00m
the position of the ju
OK! For 0<=d<=0.40m
estimated using blen
NO NEED of depressing
5.1. Position of the jump the downstream stilling
curve method
basin level by depth d
The discharge per unit width = q =CdH3/2
Where H =U/S TEL-WCL = 4.390
Cd = 2.200
q (m3/s/m)= 20.24
WCL 1866.51
U/S TEL = 1870.013
D/S TEL = 1868.399
HL = KIYA: 1.614 138.31
for the given HL & q Ef2
Ef2 can be read from4.200
blench SEE THE REMARK
curve plate 10.1 refer
garge page 550-553
KIYA:
for the given HL & q Ef2
can be read from blench SEE THE REMARK
Location of the Jumpcurve
= D/Splate
TEL10.1 refer
- Ef2 1864.20
garge page 550-553
5.2. Length of D/s aprone
Length of the jump = 5-6*(Y2-Y1) = 21.29
REMARK ;- Since there was no detail Head work Geological report and as we obserb
during site visite the top part of the river geology weatherd it is higly recommend to remove
the weathered part FOR A DEPTH OF 0.5M and provide C-20 plain concrete for the given
length.
Accourding to Bligh's L =2.21C√(HL/10)
Take "C" Based on foundation material in our case the
foundation is belived to be sound rock deep after the
weathered part 14.000
L= 12.4 KIYA:
Since the foundation
Provide an average D/S apron length = 21.3
rock
Tickness of apron for U/S 0.5
U/S Apron length considering the river foundation take 3.0
A Nominial length of
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
Case-1
Crest level(CL) 1866.514
RBL 1863.000
C= 2.2
Lef = 59.23
H 3.51
Hd=He 3.50
TWD 4.96
OUT PUT
CASE-2
Stage, H (m) Q (m3/s) He=(Q/CL)2/3 (m)
1863.500 4.74 0.11

1864.000 29.11 0.37
1864.500 74.99 0.69
1865.000 141.01 1.05
1865.500 227.73 1.45
1866.000 326.48 1.84
1866.500 426.82 2.21
1867.000 543.02 2.59
1867.500 676.10 3.00
1867.961 852.70 3.50
1868.000 867.50 3.54
q(m3/s/m) HL=U/sTEL-D/s TEL Ef1=U/S TEL-RBL(m)
0
0.08 3.616 4.124
0.49 3.354 4.382
1.27 3.154 4.706
2.38 2.989 5.068
3.84 2.856 5.465
5.51 2.720 5.859
7.21 2.288 6.220
9.17 2.554 6.604
11.41 2.409 7.011
14.40 2.286 7.513
14.65 2.287 7.553
PART-6. STILLING BASIN DESIG

REQUIRED DATA
Fr1 =
V1 =
TWD
Y1
Y2 =
OUT PUT
TWD/Y2
KIYA:
Recommended minimum water depth in the basin TW=Min 1.0*Y2 as
FOR FR < 2.5 U.S.B.R recommended type of basin is Type-I, by providing simple recommended by U
horizontal pool with cistern level lowered by 0.15mfrom river bed with Y2=YT suppress wave actio
check the tendency
jump to sweep out.
Ratio of Length of stilling basin & Y2 from the graph (L/Y2) =
Stilling basin free board to over come over toping=0.1*(V1+Y2)
Then length of the basin…..Case-1 using graph for Case-1 for Fr read L/Y2 …..L =
L/Y2 also in case-2 using L =5(Y2-Y1)
Case-2 L= 6(Y2-Y1) ….=
Height of end sill (h4) = (h4/Y1) * Y1 where
Height of baffel block (h3) = (h3/Y1) * Y1 where
from graph "h4/Y1" =
from graph "h3/Y1" =
Height of Chut blocks (HCB) = Y1 =
Width of Chut blocks (WCB) = WCB=Y1 =
Length of Chut blocks (LCB) = WCB=2*Y1 =
Spacing between chutblocks & retaning wall (SCB) = 0.5Y1
Spacing between Baffel blocks & retaning wall (SBB) = 0.375Y2
If Baffel Blocks provided lengeth of Stilling basin will redeused by 1.25Y1 from stilling
basin with out Baffel blocks (L) =L-1.25Y2
Part-7. DESIGN OF IMPERVIOUS AND PERV

7.1. Determination of cutoff (scour depth)
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
Average particl size (D), The river bed is composed of large cobbels withgravels and sand
design discharge per meter width (q)
Tail water depth (TWD) =
Weir height=H
River bed level(RBL)
U/S HFL
D/S HFL
D/S stiling basin level
Depth of Scour below high flood level (i.e. From MFL to Bottom of u/s Cutoff)
(R = 1.35(q 2/f)1/3 = Where
Lacy's silt factor ( f = 1.76√d) = f=
So Depth of scour will be R=
Down stream cutt-off (D/S Cut-off) = 1.5*R =
upstream cut off (U/S Cut-off) = 1.25* R =
Reduce level of bottom of u/s cut off =(U/S HFL-1.25R)
Depth of U/S cut off bellow river bed level
Tickness of cut off for both U/S and D/S
Reduce level of bottom of d/s cut off = (D/S HFL-1.5R)
Depth of D/S cut off bellow river bed level
bottom level of u/s cut off
bottom level of d/s cut off
Up Stream Apron lengths & Depths=L=4C(h/33)1/2 where C=9
so use U/S apron length (L) = 1meter
U/S and D/S Lunching aprone
provide for D/S cut off andUp stream cut of Lunching apron
Average river bolder diameter D
provide D/S lunching apron lendth L= 1.5D
N.B. Provide 2meter Lunchin apron having a diameter of stone > 1meter
Post Jump Height (Y2) =

D/S Cistern level
Cestern Level
River bed level (RBL) =
Weir height (H) =
Tail water depth (TWD) =
Design Head (Hd) =He
U/S Design Head (Hd) =
U/S Velocity Head (Ha) =
D/S Velocity Head corsponding to TWD (Ha) =
Velocity corrsponding TWD
Weir crust level (WCL) = BOTH SHOULD BE ON THE
Left side Bottom Intak level = SAME LEVEL
U/S High flood level (HFL) = WCL+Hd
D/S High flood level (HFL) = RBL+TWD
U/S Total Energy level (TEL) = U/S HFL + U/S Ha
D/S Total Energy level (TEL) = D/S HFL+D/S Ha
Aflux = U/S TEL -D/S TEL
D/S Aprone Level
D/S End Cill Top level
U/S Cut off level =U/S HFL+U/S Cutoff
D/S Cut off level =D/S HFL+D/S Cutoff
 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e 
 M ( )  1 .5
 M ()
e
M  L 
L
F 2v 6
 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e 
 M ( )  1 .5
 M ()
e
M  L 
L
F 2v 6

HT DETERMINATION
VALUE UNIT REMARK
1863.00 m
1863.00
1.00 m From MCD
10028 m From topo
0.0005 m/m From MCD
1860.00 m From topo
1867.96 m Fro TWD
852.700 m From Hyd
0.100 m Assumed
0.150 m Assumed
0.250 m Assumed
5.014 m
4.961 m
VALUE UNIT REMARK
1866.51 m
1865.014 m RS MC
3.51 m Select the larger value
KIYA:
Minimum driving head for
full supply discharge 1.50
should m 1.50
be > 0.15m
KIYA: 0.50 m
FICIENT DETERMINATION
IF > than flow depth in MC
thus the discharge can be
drived, so take calculated
om Hdifferent angles.Some of these are construction materials
terials during flood time, Considering the foundation the weir is selected to be
nforced concrete. In this project,there are different size of stones along the river
VALUE UNIT REMARK

2.2 - Pier condit
60 m 23.5 Square nosed
1 Rounded nosed
0.6 Pointed nose
0.01 from tabel Abutment con
0.1 from tabel Square abutments with head wall at
3.51 Rounded abutments with head wall a
852.7 Rounded abutmen
3.5 m
VALUE UNIT REMARK
Hd) and submergence need to be checked whether a correction factor needs to be
3.469 m
3.469 m
Hd (Goal seek)
3.24 m D/S TEL =
3.24
1.08 m
2.19995863597478
59.24 m
KIYA:
If < 1.33 it is a low3.498
spill m
way, so the effect of59.23
depth m
of approach on discharge
3.499
cofficient is not negligibel
m
and c=0.72 59.23 m
2.233 m/s
0.254 m OGL=
2.0 ca/cd=0.995 neglible No Effect on Cd

abi: abi:
0.6 if>0.4 submergencedoes
not affect C and C=cd
KIYA:
K FOR
any impact AFLUX
If it is very small it have not
so neglect
1869.76 m
KIYA:
1870.01
(Hd+d)/He = (He+h)/He > m
1867.96
1.7 for no submergenc i.e m
the "Cd" is not affected by
tell water condition
0.437 m
1868.40 m
1.8 KIYA: m
For good rocky
foundation the aflux can
be up to 1.2, usually it
LE DETERMINATION should be 1"see garg
VALUE UNIT REMARK Values of K & n based

U/s Slope
2 - Vertical
1.85 - 1:3 (H:V)
3.499 m 2:3 (H:V)
5.799 m 3:3 (H:V)
1
1.2500
VALUE UNIT REMARK
1.250
1.250
1.250
1.250 0.553333333333333
4.98 1.709
2.791 1.36745939865571
1.188 0 0.594 1.188

0.196559630283865 0 0.0545241413009798 0.19655963028
-0.196559630283865 0 -0.0545241413009798 -0.1965596303
27*Hd)1.85)/(Hd0.85))+0.126Hd-0.4315Hd0.375(X+0.27Hd)0.625
-0.944604167036475 ………………………….
0.440815277950355
4.244
12.944
81.5472
18.1216
-0.472302083518238 -0.708453125277356 -0.944604167036475 -0.944604167

0.0713091210357223 0.178091642960661 0.440815277950355 3.5
-0.0713091210357223 -0.178091642960661 -0.440815277950355 -3.5
3.499 m
4.42 m
1.16112954415705
9.99551289674482
IC JUMP DETERMINATION
VALUE UNIT REMARK
1863.000 m Comment USBR & In
3.51 Type of jump
1866.514 undular
4.961 m weak
852.700 m oscillating
59.23 m steady
1863.000 m strong
3.499 m
14.396 m3/s/m
0.254 m
KIYA:
3.24 m KIYA: KIYA:
KIYA:
USBR;-LSB > 4Y2
INDIAN:-Type-2
USBR:-Only
U.S.B.R
USBR:-(V<15m/s)U.S.B.R
USBR:-(V>15m/s)U.S.B.R
INDIAN:-Type-3
Type-1,having
Fr horizontal
> 4.5 & 4, A
& V > 15m/s,no
appron,LSB
Chute
Type-2,having
Type-3,having
vertical
blocks
basin
and
=and
5Y2 end KIYA:
horizontal
Chute
OUT PUT blocks blocks,
sill,LSB
blocks,baffle
appronand
= (4.3-6)Y2
having
end
blocks
sill
endno
and
sill.
Coonsider
need ecomomy &
endBaffel
of sill blocks Natural water way lower
Trial-2 Assuming the depth of appron is lowerd by D1 = -0.5 the apron by this value
Applying Bernoulli's Equation b/n u/s and at the toe of spillway
H+He = D/SRBL-0.6+Y1+ (V12/2g)
7.01253395198684 D/S RBL-0.6+Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g)
GOAL SEEK
Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g) = 7.513
Y1 1.3044
solve by goal seek 7.513
Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

V1 = 11.037
Fr1 = 3.1
Ha1 = 6.2083
TWD from Y1/Y2 = 1/2*(-1+√(1+8F12) TWD=
4.700 Y2 = 5.08
V2 = 2.836
Ha2 = 0.4099
Head loss (HL) = (Y2-Y1)3/(4Y1Y2) 2.0
KIYA: Difference B/n Y2 AND TWD i.e (Y2-TWD)= -0.1235
the position of the jump is
estimated using blench
curve method
SEE THE REMARK

SEE THE REMARK
5.3. Back water curve length(BL)

Back water length =Y= (Xs-2∆o)1/2 +2∆o
TWD 4.961
Hd 3.24
WEIR HEIGHT (H) = 3.5
river slope 0.0159
∆o 1.79623955906626
X= 234.15 0
Y 0.003 1.796
KIYA:
Since the foundation is
rock
6.0
Tail water depth and Post Jump (m)

5.0
VALUE REMARK
4.0
Case-2
1866.514
3.0
1862.500 D/S river bed lowered by
2.20 2.0
59.23 -0.5
3.51 1.0
3.65
4.96 0.0
0 1 2
OUT PUT
ha=v2/(2*g)
q=Q/55(m3/s/m) R=1.35*(q2/2)(1/3) (m) v=q/R (m/s)
(m)
0
0.08 0.20 0.40 0.01
0.49 0.67 0.74 0.03
1.27 1.25 1.01 0.05
2.38 1.91 1.25 0.08
3.84 2.63 1.46 0.11
5.51 3.34 1.65 0.14
7.21 4.00 1.80 0.17
9.17 4.69 1.95 0.19
11.41 5.43 2.10 0.23
14.40 6.34 2.27 0.26
14.65 6.41 2.28 0.27
Goal Seek
Ef1=y1+q^2/(2gy1^2) F1=(q2/(g*y1^3))^0.5 Y1 (m) V1=q/y1 (m/s)
4.124 30.404 0.009 8.985

4.382 12.742 0.053 9.216
4.706 8.271 0.134 9.471
5.068 6.278 0.245 9.728
5.465 5.136 0.385 9.983
5.859 4.440 0.540 10.216
6.219 3.997 0.692 10.413
6.603 3.645 0.864 10.611
7.019 3.362 1.055 10.817
7.512 3.085 1.304 11.036
7.552 3.066 1.325 11.054
G BASIN DESIGN
VALUE VALUE REMARK
2.873 Case
10.524 1
5.0 2
1.4
4.916
VALUE KIYA: REMARK 3
1.0 Horizontal depresed apron
USBR Recomendetion
KIYA: 1. 1 <TWD/Y2 < 1.1
4.916
TW=Min 1.0*Y2 as
minimum
=horizontal appron
recommended by USBR To 2. TWD > 1.1 Slopping 4
suppress wave-Iaction and toapron
Type
check the tendency of the
jump to sweep out. 5
4.000 m read from graph
KIYA:
0.000 m
Fr=4.5-9 stable & well developed
jump is formed. It has best
20 performance. If energy m
21 dissipation ranges from m 45%- take max value
KIYA:
0.150 70%, it called steady m jump
considering the incoming
0.0 bolder take mnominial height
of end cill =0.5m
0.000 m
read from graph
0.000 m
0.0 m
0.0 m
0.000 m
0.000 m
0.000 m
0.000 m
m
OUS AND PERVIOUS APRON

VALUE REMARK
7.00 NB. Depends on Bed material for d50(average particle size) (Geology report) or from standard refre
13.677 m3/s/m
4.961 m
3.514 m
1863.000 m
1869.758 m
1867.961 m
1862.500 m
4.66 m
4.623 m
6.935 m
5.779 m
1863.979 m
-0.979 1 so provide 2.5 cutoff depth
0.500
1861.026 m
1.974 2.5 so provide 2m cutoff depth
1862.000 m
1860.500 m
12 Not Economica
8.000 m
6.935
2.00 take 2meter for down stream
FINAL OUT PUT

4.916
-0.5
1862.50
1863.00 U/S TEL = 1870.01
3.51 U/S HFL = 1869.76
4.96 He =Hd= 3.499
3.499 WCL = 1866.51
3.244
0.25
3.13 LS BIL = 1865.01
7.84 RS BIL = 1999.00 H=
1866.51
1865.01 RBL = 1863.000 8.0
1869.76 1
1867.96 0.5
1870.01 1862.000
1871.10
1.80
1862.50 0.50 8.0
1862.65
1862.00
1860.150
0.578403755868545
Pier condition Kp
Square nosed pier 0.02
Rounded nosed piers 0.01
Pointed nose piers 0
Abutment condition Ka
Square abutments with head wall at 90o to the direction of flow 0.2
Rounded abutments with head wall at 90o to the direction of flow 0.1
Rounded abutments at 45o 0
U/S HFL = 1870.013
WCL = 1866.514
H= 3.514
Y1 = 0.000
1863.000
Values of K & n based on U/S shape

K n
2 1.85
1.936 1.836
1.936 1.81
1.873 1.776
1.782 2.376 2.97
0.416162703208604 0.70859783089579 1.07073831256
-0.416162703208604 -0.70859783089579 -1.07073831256
-9.94460416703648 -9.94460416703648 -9.44460416703648

3.5 6.5 6.5
-3.5 -6.5 -6.5
Comment USBR & Indian S.basin

froud no Energy dissipation
1-1.7 5%
1.7- 2.5 20%
2.5 - 4.5 20-40%
4.5 - 9.0 45-70%
>9 70-85%
A:-LSB > 4Y2 KIYA:

R
e-2
IAN:-Type-3
-(V<15m/s)U.S.B.R
-(V>15m/s)U.S.B.R
-Only
Type-1,having
Fr horizontal
> 4.5 & 4, A INDIAN:-Type-
no
blocks
cal
,having
,LSB
basin
and
=and
5Y2 end KIYA:1,Fr>4.5,Basin
horizontal
Chute 1,Fr<4.5,Basin with chut
baffle
on
and
= (4.3-6)Y2
having
end
blocks
sill
endno
and
sill.
Coonsider
needand ,baffle
ecomomy blocks
& &a
el blocks Natural
dentated
water way
sill lower
the apron by this value
6.0 TWD and Post jump comparasion
Tail water depth and Post Jump (m)
5.0
4.0
3.500
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Tail water depth (m) Po
Discharge, Q (m3/s)
U/s HFL=RBL+H+(He-ha ) U/s TEL=U/sHFL+ha

Tail water depth (m)
(m) (m)
0
1866.616 1866.624 0.500
1866.854 1866.882 1.000
1867.154 1867.206 1.500
1867.489 1867.568 2.000
1867.856 1867.965 2.500
1868.220 1868.359 3.000
1868.554 1868.720 3.500
1868.909 1869.104 4.000
1869.286 1869.511 4.500
1869.750 1870.013 4.961
1869.787 1870.053 5.000
Y2=y1/2*((1+8f1^2)^.5-1) (m) v2=q/y2 (m/s) ha=v2/(2*g) (m)
0
0.378 0.211 0.002
0.935 0.526 0.01
1.498 0.845 0.04
2.054 1.159 0.07
2.611 1.472 0.11
3.129 1.761 0.16
3.581 2.013 0.21
4.042 2.268 0.26
4.517 2.527 0.33
5.076 2.836 0.41
5.121 2.860 0.42
Condition Recommended basin

TWD = Y2 horizontal apron
TWD < Y2 1. A depressed horizontal aprone having sill
2.Stillining basin having sill or baffle blocks
3. rock foundation Ski Jump bucket
TWD > Y2 1. A Vertical slopping apron
2. Lowering river bed,stilling basin
3. A roller bucket
TWD < Y2(at low Q) 1. A vertical slopping apron
2. Vertical apron with baffel block Sill for V<15m/s
TWD > Y2(at low Q) 1.A vertical and horizontal apron having sill
) (Geology report) or from standard refrence mat'l
PUT
3.51
Y2 =
6
14.0
D/S TWL= 1869.961
D/S HFL = 1867.961
Y2 = #REF! TWD= 4.961
SB Level = 1863.000
3.564 4.158 4.98 5.5513176048 5.95131760484
1.50026731515251 1.9953551609 2.78585299 3.5 4
-1.50026731515251 -1.995355161 -2.785853 -3.5 -4
-9.44460416703648 -0.944604167 -0.85 5 7 7 9

4 4
-4 -4 -6 -6 -6 -5.5 -5.5
sion
1863.000
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Tail water depth (m) Post Jump
D/s HFL=RBL+TWD D/S TEL=D/S

(m) HFL+ha (m)
1863.000 1863.01
1863.500 1863.53
1864.000 1864.05
1864.500 1864.58
1865.000 1865.11
1865.500 1865.64
1866.000 1866.17
1866.500 1866.69
1867.000 1867.23
1867.461 1867.72
1867.500 1867.77
Jhfl
1862.500 1862.5 0.000
1862.878 1863 -0.122
1863.435 1863.5 -0.065
1863.998 1864 -0.002
1864.554 1864.5 0.054
1865.111 1865 0.111
1865.629 1865.5 0.129
1866.081 1866 0.081
1866.542 1866.5 0.042
1867.017 1867 0.017
1867.576 1867.46133 0.115
1867.621 1867.5 0.121
ed basin
apron
sill
ocks
or V<15m/s
sill
D/S TEL = 1871.10
D/S HFL= 1867.96
TWD = 4.96
4.9156 1862.65
RBL = 1863.00
1998.9
2.5
1860.15
21.3 0.50
15 9 9 8.6
-4.3 -2.3 -4.8 -4.8
9 11 11 13 13 15
-5 -5 -5 -5 -4.5 -4.5
TED
TETA
Lj Y2
1.01646 0.1372996
0
-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
SIN 25 0.4226183
COS 25 0.9063078
Tan 29 0.5543091
Tan 23 0.4244748
Tan 25 0.4663077
INPUT OUT PUT

SIN 1 90
COS 1 0
TAN 1 45
#REF!
16.5
Y1 Y1/Y2 f1 Yt
0.3826089 2.7866722 4.5 3.307
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
7. DESIGN OF IMPERVIOUS & PERVIO
7.1. Design of impervious apron length.
Under seepage through the structure is checked for two cases:
CASE-1 Under a no flow condition where the head difference is the difference between the weirs
downstream bed level.
CASE-2
Under a full discharge condition with a hydraulic jump in the stilling basin.
REQUIRED DATA
River bed level U/S
TWL
Depth of flow after jump = Y2
River bed level D/S
Weir crest level
U/S HFL
D/S HFL
Cisterne level
Pre jump water depth =Y1
Weir Bottom width
U/S Cutt off depth (d1)
D/S Cutt off depth (d1)
Tickness of both U/S & D/S Cut off
Creep coefficient for mixture of boulders,gravels and cobbles "C" =
River bed form mixture of Boulder & gravel
U/S Aprone length
Tickness of both U/S apron
OUT PUT
CASE-1 Percolation head, HW= crest level- D/S River bed level
CASE-2 Percolation head, HW= (U/S HFL – D/S HFL) =
Total creep length, L = C * Hw
D/S impervious apron L D/S = 2.21*C* √(Hw/10)
D/S Apron length, L1 provided to meet hydraulicjump
Take Maximum of the two apron length (D/S apron length)
U/S impervious apron Length L U/S = L-(Ld/s+B+2Y1+2Y2)
7.2. Design of pervious apron (protection work) length

Protection works are required on the u/s and d/s in order to obviate the possibility of scour hole traveling cl
through the filter. But in Sebat wedel case river bed material is covered with gravel, and boulder that can a
of 2 m with boulders to protect the weir from direct impact of boulders and downstream after the imperviou
residual energy that may possibly come from high floods with larger return periods.
Bligh's Meth
3.Design of impervious floor thickness
From practical point of view, the u/s apron (impervious floor) mostly covered by river deposit, one thickne
structure, and uplift pressure is also counter balanced by the weight of the standing water. Hence provide n
thickness of 1 m u/s of the weir
Consider Case-A, The uplift preasure under no flow condition which is determined by t=
4/3*(Hr/G-1) where Hr the residual head remaning at a point
Take unit weight of floor material G =
Percolation head (Hw) =
Percolation head (Hw) =
C
Safty Factor …………….(S.F)
point G Hw
A 2.3 3.51
B 2.3 3.51
C 2.3 3.51
D 2.3 3.51
Consider Case-B, High flood condition with a hydraulic jump forms in the basin under the
maximum flow condition t= 4/3*(Hr/G-1)
point G Hw
A 2.3 1.80
B 2.3 1.80
C 2.3 1.80
D 2.3 1.80
CONCLUSION The concrete thickness to be adopted for the structure is the g
Khosla's Met
4. Check for the exit gradient
REQUIRED DATA
B =Total Length of impervious apron =
d2 =D/S cut off
Hw =
α= b/d =
From khosla's pressure curve where λ = (1+ sqrt(1+α^2))*0.5
Hence, GE = Hw/d2*(1/(π*√λ)) =
The maximum permissible exit gradient for mixture of gravel, boulder, cobble and sand is 0.25 which is gr
the structure is safe against piping.
5.Checking the thickness of the impervious floor by khosla’s
· Pressure at key points of u/s cutoff

1.pressure calculation
let the floor thickness in the upstreame be 0.50m and near the down stream cutoff be 0.7
Assumed u/s floor thickness = =
A.up stream sheet pile =
let the thickness of sheet pile =
d1 = =
b= =
α= b/d = =
From khosla's pressure curve where =
λ = (1+ sqrt(1+α^2))*0.5 i.e
λ =
(λ -2)/λ =
(λ -1 )/λ =
φE = (1/π)cos--1(λ-2)/λ =
φD = (1/π)cos--1(λ-1)/λ =
φC1 = 100 - φE =
φD1 = 100 - φD =
φE1 =
φD1 - φC1 =
A Correction for floor thickness =
where 0.5 is the nominal thickness of u/s apron.
Percolation head, HW= crest level- D/S River bed level
B correction for interference of d/s cutoff on фC1 = C = 19√D/b'*(d+D)/b
D = depth of pile whose influence has to be Determined on the adjacent pile depth d. =
b’=distance b/n two piles =
b=Total floor length ~b’ =
d= depth of pile on which the effects of another Depth (D) is to be calculated
for concrte take G =
C=
Corrected φC1 =
The residual pressure head at C1=Hw* Corrected фC1 =
Floor Thickness at Point C1 =(t) =corrected C1/(G-1) =
From practical point of view, the u/s apron (impervious floor) mostly covered by river deposit, thickness o
and since uplift pressure is counter balanced by the weight of the standing water nominal thickness of 0.5m
Pressure at key points of D/s cutoff

1.pressure calculation
let the floor thickness in the upstreame be 0.50m and near the down stream cutoff be 0.7
Assumed u/s floor thickness = =
A.down stream sheet pile =
let the thickness of sheet pile =
d2 = =
b= =
α= b/d = =
From khosla's pressure curve where λ = (1+ sqrt(1+α^2))*0.5 i.e
λ =
(λ -2)/λ =
(λ -1 )/λ =
φE = (1/pi)cos--1(λ-2)/λ =
φD = (1/pi)cos--1(λ-1)/λ =
φC =
φE - Φd =
A Correction for floor thickness =

B correction for interference of d/s cutoff on фE = C = 19√D/b'*(d+D)/b
D = depth of pile whose influence has to be Determined on the adjacent pile depth d. =
b’=distance b/n two piles =
b=Total floor length ~b’ =
d= depth of pile on which the effects of another Depth (D) is to be calculated
for concrte take G =
C=
Corrected φE =
The residual pressure head at E =Hw* Corrected фE =
Floor Thickness at Point E =(t) =corrected E/(G-1) =
Thickness for intermediate points A ,B,C & D

By assuming the uplift pressure is usually varying linearly from u/s to the d/s the pressure head (uplift) at i
calculated in below.

Corrected φC1 =
Corrected φE =
The residual pressure head at C1=Hw* Corrected фC1 =
The residual pressure head at E =Hw* Corrected фE =
Specific Gravity of concrete
Location
The residual pressure head (RP) =
Horizontal creep length b/n C1 and E-----(b)
Horizontal creep length--(L)-- b/n (C1 from A & B )&( E from C & D)
The preasure at each location( P ) = (RP-[(RPC1-RPE)/b]*L =
Thickness at each point =P/(G-1)*1.3 (i.e with an extra thickness 30%)
Periviously calculated Thickness at each point (by Blighs)=
TAKE =
QUANTITY
all are in meter un
A U/S CUT-OFF WIDTH
1 EXCAVATION
KIYA:
1.1. WEATHERED ROCK EXC 60.0 from drawin
1.2. HARD ROCK EXC 60.0
1.3. Aluvial deposit 60.0
2 STONE WORK
2.1. CYCLOPEAN CONCRTE (40%X60%) 60.0
3.3. FORM WORK 60
A U/S APRONE
1 EXCAVATION
1.1. WEATHERED ROCK EXC 60.0
2 STONE WORK
3.3. FORM WORK 60.0
B D/S CUT-OFF
4 EXCAVATION
5 STONE WORK
6.3. FORM WORK 60.0
B D/S APRONE
4 EXCAVATION
5 STONE WORK
6 CAPPING
6.1. C-20 CONCRETE 60.0
6.2. ø 12 RAINFORCMENT BAR -
U/S CUT-OFF
Data length width
KIYA:
Discription 25.00 0.50Drawing
From
No of bar dis = (length -2*covery)/spacing b/n bar
No of bar log = (width-2* covery)/spacng b/n bar
length of bar dis = Width - twosides of covery
length of bar long = Length -two sides of coveryb
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 10 52.332
lon 12 52.332
U/S APRONE
Data length width
Discription 25.00 10.00
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 12 1236.032
lon 10 1236.032
D/S CUT-OFF
Data length width
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 14 301.532
lon 14 301.532
D/S APRONE
Data length width
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 16 1510
lon 10 1510
45
1125
1250
299
260
US & PERVIOUS APRON LENGTH
fference between the weirs crest level and the
stilling basin.
VALUE Unit REMARK
1863.00 m
4.96 m
4.92 m
1863.00 m
1866.51 m
1869.758 m Safe Exit Gradient by "Bligh's"
1867.96 m Valueb Safe Exit
1862.50 m Soil Type of C Gradient
1.304 m Fine sand 15 0.14
6.000 m Course grained Sand 12 0.17
1.000 m Sand & Boulder 9 0.25
2.500 m
0.500 m
9.000 m
8.000 m
0.5 m
VALUE Unit REMARK
3.51 m
1.80 m
31.63 m
11.79 m
19.7 m
19.7 m
6.84 8
ty of scour hole traveling close to the impervious floor of the weir and to relive any residual uplift pressure
avel, and boulder that can act as protection work, so it is important to fill the upstream of weir for a length
wnstream after the impervious apron .The river bed has large cobble which is adequate to dissipate any
ods.
gh's Methods
y river deposit, one thickness cover of the
ing water. Hence provide nominal
where
Hr =Hw-Hw/L*(Lp)
2.3 where Hr = Residual head
3.51
1.80
9
1.3
KIYA:
In Bligh's method, the apron length is
L Lp Hr Lcsafe against piping & seepaget if L<Lc
and therefore, the apron provided is
31.63 12.50 2.125 40.66 Err:508 2.18
safe against piping & seepage, if Lc is
31.63 15.500 1.792 far greaterErr:508
40.66 than L 1.84
31.63 22.054 1.064 40.66 Err:508 1.09
31.63 28.608 0.335 40.66 Err:508 0.34
KIYA:
In Bligh's method, the apron length is
L Lp Hr Lcsafe against piping & seepaget if L<Lc
and therefore, the apron provided
1.38 is
31.63 8.00 1.342 40.66 Err:508
safe against piping & seepage, if Lc is
31.63 14.554 0.970 far greaterErr:508
40.66 than L 0.99
31.63 21.108 0.597 40.66 Err:508 0.61
KIYA:
31.63 27.662
Since 0.225 40.66 Err:508 0.23
KIYA:it didn't Accommodate
the Jump
Since thelength take as
foundation is the
Jump
soundlength = 15 only
rock provide
0.5m apron length.
ted for the structure is the greater of the two cases. Hence adopt the First case.
sla's Methods KIYA:

U/S AND D/S APRON
LENGTH PLUS WEIR
BOTTOM WIDTH
VALUE Unit REMARK

26.16 m from drawing
2.5 m
3.514 m
10.46497379
6.2563218228
0.18 0.25 Safe
and sand is 0.25 which is greater than the GE=0.14 then
down stream cutoff be 0.70m.

0.5 m
0.500 m
1 m
26.162434474 m
26.162434474
13.590769435 %
0.8528412972 %
0.9264206486 %
17.48774299 %
12.286910545 %
82.51225701 %
87.713089455 %
100 %
5.2008324458 %
2.6004162229 %(+ve)
3.514 m
2.5 m
26.162434474 m
26.162434474 m
1 m
2.3
0.785731961 %(+ve)
85.898405194 %
3.0184699585
2.3218999681 Take the min 0.5
y river deposit, thickness of the structure,
r nominal thickness of 0.5m is provided.
down stream cutoff be 0.70m.

0.5 m
0.500 m
2.5 m
26.162434474 m
10.46497379
5.7563218228
0.6525559096
0.8262779548
27.369675088 %
19.045405002 %
0 %
8.3242700866 %
1.6648540173 %(-ve)
3.514
1
26.162434474
26.162434474
2
2.3
0.4259490218 %(-ve)
25.278872049 %
0.8882995638
0.6833073568 Take the max 0.68
e pressure head (uplift) at intermediate are
3.514
85.898405194
25.278872049
3.0184699585
0.8882995638
2.3
A B C D
3.0184699585 3.01846995850283 3.018469959 3.018469959
26.16 26.16 26.16 26.16
12.50 15.5 22.05414482 28.60828965
2.00 1.76 1.22 0.69
2.0 1.8 1.2 0.7
2.18 1.8 1.1 0.34
2.0 1.8 1.2 0.7
QUANTITY
all are in meter unless it is specified
LENGTH DEPTH(avg) W.SPACE AREA VOLUME UNIT
KIYA: KIYA:
0.5 drawing
from 0.5 From0.5drawing30.0 30.0 m3
0.5 1.0 0.5 60.0 60.0 m3
0.5 1.0 0.5 60.0 60.0 m3
0.5 1.5 - 90 45 m3
- 1.5 - 90 m2
0.5 2.05 0.5 123 61.5 m3

0.5 1.4 0.5 84 42 m3
0.5 2.06 0.5 123.6 61.8 m3
10 0.2 - 13 130 m3
10 0.2 - 12 m2
0.5 0.5 0.5 32.5 32.5 m3

0.5 2 0.5 130 130 m3
0.5 1 0.5 65 65 m3
0.5 2.5 - 150 75 m3

0.5 2.5 - 150 m2
21 0.75 0.5 45 967.5 m3

21 1.25 0.5 75 1612.5 m3
21 1 0.5 60 1290 m3
21 1.4 - 84 1764 m3
21 0.2 - 12 252 m3
- - - - 0 kg
KIYA: Spacing
From Drawing 0.2
= 124.6 No
= 2.1 No
= 0.42 m
= 24.92 m
mass of 1 m Over all Quantity ---

length of Ø-- Total Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
0.6161 32.2423
0.8872 46.4290 78.6713
64.48465333
Spacing
0.2
= 124.6 No
= 49.6 No
= 9.92 m
= 24.92 m

(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
0.8872 1096.6076
0.6161 761.5330 1858.1406
Spacing
0.2
= 124.6 No
= 12.1 No
= 2.42 m
= 24.92 m

(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
1.2076 364.1233
728.2467
1.2076 364.1233 728.2467
Spacing
0.2
= 106.028871 No
= 299.6 No
= 59.92 m
= 21.20577421 m

(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
1.5772 2381.6391
0.6161 930.3278
1385
1510
16.1
3.51
8
1.304
0.5
1 C1 2.18 1.84 1.09 0.34
E1 C
D1 B
A
0.5 U/S AL B= D/S Apron Length
6.000 6.554
19.7
6.000
26.16
Khosla's Methods
Pressure at key points of E1, C1 & D1 of u/s cut off
For 1/a = d/b, d= u/s cut off depth
b= horizontal creep length
for 1/ a and from khoslas curve
ØD = -----------% and ØE = -----------% and ØC1 =100- ØE=--------------%
Hence, ØD1= 100-ØD = ---------------%
ØE1 = 100% since it is located at u/s floor level
*Correction for thickness for ØC1 =Øc1+[(ØD1-ØC1)/d]* t
= ---------------%
Where d= ------m (d/s cut off) and t= 0.5m (u/s apron thickness)
*Correction for interference of d/s cut off for Ø C1,

C= 19 (D/b)1/2 *[(d+D)/b] where D=(d/s cut off), d = (u/s cut off) & b= --------------m
C= -------------% (+)
The correction for ØC1= Correction for thickness for ØC1 +C= -------------%
Pressure at key points E, D and C of d/s cut off

For 1/a = d/b, ØD = --------% & ØE= ------------%
ØC= 0, as it is located at the d/s floor level.
Correction for thickness for ØE= ØE- [(ØE-ØD)/d]*t
Where t=d/s floor thickness, d= d/s cut off
Correction for thickness for ØE =---------- %

Correction for interference of u/s cut off for Ø E,
C= 19 (d /b )1/2 *[(d+D)/b] D= u/s cut off, d= d/s cut off , b= horzt creep
= ------------% ( - )
Hence, total correction for ØE = Correction for thickness for ØE –C = ------------ %
Thickness for intermediate points A & B

If the pressure variation b/n u/s cut off C 1 and d/s cut off E, is assumed to be linear, the residual pressures
floor thickness for points A & B are found as:
Hrc1 = Hmax * ØC1= --------------m, ØC1 = -----------% & Hmax = weir height
At point E, the residual pressure head
HrE = Hmax * ØE = ---------m
Thickness at point A: The uplift pressure at A is given as:

PA= Hrc1- [(Hrc1-HrE )/b] *LA,
Where b= horizontal creep length b/n C1 & E = --------------- m
LA= Horizontal creep length b/n C 1 & point A, LA=--------------- m
Therefore, PA= ---------m
And the thickness at A,
tA= PA/gm-1 where gm = 2.3 t/m3 (spec gravity of masonry)
tA= (PA/ gm-1 )*1.30 ( i.e. with an excreta thickness of 30%)
tA = ---------------------m
But, the assumed thickness at point A was --------m and the thickness obtained by khosla's method is ------
Therefore, the previous thickness -------------------m is safe.
Thickness at B: Uplift pressure at B
PB= Hrc1 – [(Hrc1 - HrE )/b] *LB, Where LB =----------- m, b= -------------- m
= -------------------------m
tB= (PB/ gm-1 )*1.30 ( i.e. with an excreta thickness of 30%)
But the assumed thickness at point B was ---------m and the thickness obtained by khosla's method is ------
and hence the previous assumed thickness, ------------m is safe.
d a den wt/m(KG/m) Meter Mass(Kg)
6 0.00002826 7850 0.2218 0.2220 0 0
8 0.00005024 7850 0.3944 0.3947 0 0
10 0.0000785 7850 0.6162 0.6167 88.08 54.277098
12 0.00011304 7850 0.8874 0.8880 204.12 181.1287397
14 0.00015386 7850 1.2078 1.2087 #REF! #REF!
16 0.00020096 7850 1.5775 1.5787 0 0
18 0.00025434 7850 1.9966 1.9980 0 0
20 0.000314 7850 2.4649 2.4667 0 0
22 0.00037994 7850 2.9825 2.9847 0 0
24 0.00045216 7850 3.5495 3.5520 0 0
26 0.00053066 7850 4.1657 4.1687 0 0

28 0.00061544 7850 4.8312 4.8347 0 0
30 0.0007065 7850 5.5460 5.5500 0 0
32 0.00080384 7850 6.3101 6.3147 0 0
34 0.00090746 7850 7.1236 7.1287 0 0
36 0.00101736 7850 7.9863 7.992 0 0
0.00
D E C
2.5
pron Length
6.554 6.5541448
D
0.5
ods
r, the residual pressures and
y khosla's method is ------------m.
y khosla's method is ------------m

8. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
weir height = 3.51

Bottom wer width "B" = 6.00
Apron length -----Ld/s = 19.66
Apron length----- L u/s = 3.00
Cut off thickness 0.50
Over all head work length in cluding aprone & weir = 29.16
Befor Jump depth (d1) = = 1.30
Post Jump depth (Y2) = 5.077
Tail water depth = 4.96
Befor jump velocity head(Hv) = = 5.64
Unit discharge (q) = = 14.396
Vertical angel with which the d/s curved surface = 45

φ
make an angel D/S ( vang) = SIN φvag =
Cos φvag =
0.45
0.89
Total wer length "B" = = 6.00
Head over the weir (Hd) = = 3.499
U/S apron length__(Lu) = 8.00
D/S apron length__(Lu) = 20

Constants
Gravitational acceleration (g) = = 9.81
angel of internal friction (φ) = = 35.00
Top width of weir which the water make contact = 2.50
ϒwater = 9.81
ϒmasonary 23
Unit weight of material in KN/m3
ϒsilt 10.84
ϒRCC 25
FORCE FORMULA
1. WATER PREASURE
1. U/S static Pwh1= ϒw*A = 0.5*ϒw*h*h
Pwv2=ϒwA= ϒw hd * (h)
2. D/S Dynamic P’H= [(ϒ w q/g) (2ghv1)1/2 (1-sin Æ )] + 1/2ϒwd12
P’v = (ϒwq/g) (2ghv1)1/2 cos Æ=
WHERE q= KIYA:
Q/L Unit discarge
When d/s of the weir i
curved,like ogee weir
KIYA:
When d/s of the weir i
Is the vertical angle ogee
curved,like withweir
whi
Æ=
at the point of water level pro
g= accelerationKIYA:
due to gravity =
(2ghv1) 1/2 When
velocity of flow d/s shape
over of the
curved fa
weir toy is curved like
Hv1= velocity head at weir
Ogee d1
2. SILT PREASURE
Psilt=ϒs *h2*(1-sinФ)/(1+sinФ))/2
WHERE ϒs = the unit weight of the silt
h= the height of the silt to be
Æ= angle of internal friction fo
3. Uplift pressure
U1= ϒw*A=gw*d1xB=
U2= ϒw A = 0.5*gw (h+hd) * B
AT THE WEIR TO
1 FOR DYNAMIC CASE
Name of forces Symbol AREA(m2)
C-1 1.40
C-2 7.89
1. WEIGHT OF WEIR BODY (Self weight) C-3 2.60
C-4 9.84
C-5 5.59
2. Silt pressure
Psilt Psilt
3. Hydrodynamic pressure
1. U/S
Pwh Pwh
Pwv Pwv
2. D/S
P'wh P'wh
P'wv P'wv
4. Uplift pressure
u1 U1
u2 U2
sum
1 Checking for sliding

 F v
 1 .5
 H F
 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e
 M (  )  1 .5
2 Checking for overturning
 M ( )
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6
v
4 Checking forBearing Capacity

Maximum base pressure ΣV/B*(1+6*e/B)
Minimum base pressure ΣV/B*(1-6*e/B)
2 FOR STATIC CASE
C-1 1.40
C-2 7.89
WEIGHT OF WEIR BODY C-3 2.60
C-4 9.84
C-5 5.59
1. Water pressure(U/S)
PH1
2. Silt pressure
Psilt
5. Uplift pressure
U1
sum

 F v
 1 .5
 H F
2 Checking for overturning e

 M (  )  1 .5
 M ()
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6
v

9. WEIR CAPPING
In order to avoid cracking and shearing of the weir, apron and under sluice during ove
neccesary. thickness considered in this design case is 20cm and minimum rein forcem
per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PM
In order to avoid cracking and shearing of the weir, apron and under sluice during ove
per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PM
Assumed thickness(D) = 200

Diameter of bar = 14
Area of steel = = 566.666666666667
Minimum percentage of steel area in % = 85/fy% where
Where Pmin % = 300N/mm2
Speacing(S) = ast/(Asteel *1000) = 272
where ast = πD2/4 = 153.86
Considering cover thickness of 50mm, effective depth is = 214.517647058824

equal to (Deff = t-(50-φ/2))
Thus, Provide = φ12 @ C/C 20cm

Hence spacing of reinforcement = 271.51764705882
Actual area of steel= = 461.58
Therefore the actual provided steel area is 566.66 mm2/m i.e > 461.58, Provide reinforcement ba
of 300N/mm2.for both Operation slab and breast wall.
The spacing of the reinforcement bar should be less than three times t
N.B which is smaller of the two. Effective depth=250mm Hence the actual s
>300mm<750mm.Hence it is ok.
The spacing @ c/c should be account the diameter of the reinforcemen
larger size of the reinforcement is applied during actual operation. This
N.B divide wall with reinforcement size of 14 mm with C/c spacing of 150
provided for the weir, apron, under sluice and Divide wall and check th
information.
But from experience this cover thickness is not enough for weir cappin
N.B the rebar is exposed hence cover thickness of 70mm is provided.This c
weir, apron and under sluice. For more check the design drawing.
WEIR CAPPING
10.BAR QUANTIT
Weir body
Data length width Spacing
Discription 29.16 59.23 0.271517647058824
mass of 1 m length
Ǿ Total lenth---(m) of Ø--(Kg/m)
dis 10 6335.63514939648 0.6161
lon 10 6335.63514939649 0.6161
Weir body Anchor bar

Discription 32.00 0.00 0.271517647058824
mass of 1 m length
dis 10 129.641665583431 0.6161
lon 10 0 0.6161
AREA (m2) LENGTH (m)

1 WEIR BODY
1.1. EXCAVATION
1.1.1 CLAY AND ALUVIAL DEPOSIT 9.8046 6
1.1.2 HARD ROCK 5.6839 6
1.1.3 WEATHERED ROCK 13.7553 6
1.2. STONE WORK
1.2.1 CYCLOPIAN CONCRETE 16.37 32
1.2.2 Form Work 17.31
1.2.3 Lean concrete 0.57 32
1.3 CAPPING
1.3.1 C-20 CONCRETE 27.32 35.11
1.3.2 ø 14 RAINFORCMENT BAR

1.3.3 ø 32 RAINFORCMENT BAR for anchor
DESIGN OF THE WEIR
Unit REMARK
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
0.5
2.2360679775
m
m
m
m2/s
REMARK
Acts at 1/3 of H
Acts at 1/2 of H
Acts at 2/3 of d1
Acts at 1/3 of d1
KIYA:
discarge
When d/s of the weir is
curved,like ogee weir
KIYA:
vertical angle ogee
curved,like withweir
which the d/s curved surface makes with
oint of water level produced by d 1.
ationKIYA:
due to gravity = 9.81m/s 2
When
of flow d/s shape
over of the
curved face (momentum principle)
y head at weir
Ogee d1
Acts at 1/3 of H
it weight of the silt
ight of the silt to be deposited= weir height
of internal friction for sandy gravel
Acts at 1/2 of H
Acts at 2/3 of B
THE WEIR TOE

OR DYNAMIC CASE
Magnitude of forces (KN) Moment at "o"(KN.M)
Lever arm in
m
Vertical Horizontal Resisting Disturbing
34.96 - 6.80 237.69

197.34 - 6.53 1288.61
64.90 - 5.51 357.60
245.97 - 2.50 614.91
139.85 - 0.50 69.93
-1.63 0.4 -0.574
-120.87 2.3 -282.533

85.80 KIYA:- 6.3 540.550
Considering the worest
condition i.e the matterials
are saturated and 0.9
-83.75 -72.829
compacted filled
135.5092738017 0.4348048883 58.920
-76.7778471692 3 -230.334
-27.9983251037 2.00 -55.997
799.54 -206.250859371 3168.214 -642.266209220556
2.52 ok!
4.93 ok!
0.16 ok! 1.000
154.5 ok! 300

112.0
FOR STATIC CASE

Magnitude of forces (KN) Lever arm in Moment at "o"(KN.M)
m
32.16 6.80 218.678
181.55 6.53 1185.525
59.71 5.51 328.991
226.29 2.50 565.720
128.66 0.50 64.331
-60.56790138 1.2 -70.9452018164337
-18.1366115986 0.35 -6.373
-103.41702 4.00 -413.668

524.95 -78.7045129786 27.362733333 2363.245 -490.986487132172
4.00192969983 ok!
4.81325838274 ok!
0.56654684418 ok! 1
137.1 < 350KN/m2

37.9
R CAPPING
der sluice during overflowing and incoming of boulders, proper capping with RCC is
minimum rein forcement area is taken as 0.85% of the strength of steel. area of steel
iven by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
der sluice during overflowing and incoming of boulders, proper capping with RCC is
minimum rein forcement area is taken as 0.85% of the strength of steel. area of steel
iven by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
mm
mm
mm2
rea in % = 85/fy% where fy steel strength in N/mm 2 , fy= Pmin Pmin %
0.28333333333 0.00283333333333333
272 Take
φ12 @ C/C 20cm Dia

<3*De 643.5529411765 mm Ok!
mm2 < 566.666667
vide reinforcement bars Dia.14mm @ 200mmC/C in both directions.which has yield strength
s than three times the effective depth or 450 mm,

m Hence the actual spacing750 =
of the reinforcement when Intermediate smaller or

tual operation. This capping should also apply for
C/c spacing of 150 mm. This capping detail is
de wall and check the design drawing for further
ugh for weir capping because after repeated abrasion

m is provided.This capping detail is provided for the
esign drawing.
QUANTITY
= 107.110660355 No
= 217.850921489 No
= 59.1503696123 m
= 29.0824344744 m
Over all Quantity ---

Total Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
barr__(Kg)
3903.4552
3903.4552 7806.9104
= 117.856059621 No
= 0 No
= 1.1 m
= 32.00 m
Over all Quantity ---

Total Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
barr__(Kg)
79.8737
0.0000 79.8737
VOL(m3)
58.8276
34.1034
82.5318
523.84
18.18848
959.22
7806.9104
21.2534
C9
C8
M4
P'wv
C7
C6
P'wh
C5
C4 M2
C3
C1 C2
M3
M1
M1
M1
C4 M2
C3
C1 C2
M3
M1
M1
M1
0.75
1639.2
Pwv
C11 C12
C10
C9 M8
M7
C8
M4 M6
P'wv
C7 C13 Pwh Psl
C6
P'wh
C5 M5
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
M1
M1
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
M1
M1
8. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF T
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
weir height = 3.51

Bottom wer width "B" = 6.00
Apron length -----Ld/s = 19.66
Apron length----- L u/s = 3.00
Cut off thickness 0.50
Over all head work length in cluding aprone & weir = 29.16
Befor Jump depth (d1) = = 1.30
Post Jump depth (Y2) = 5.077
Tail water depth = 4.96
Befor jump velocity head(Hv) = = 5.64
Unit discharge (q) = = 14.396
Vertical angel with which the d/s curved surface = 48

φ
make an angel D/S ( vang) = SIN φvag =
Cos φvag =
0.74
0.67
Total wer length "B" = = 6.00
Head over the weir (Hd) = = 3.499
U/S apron length__(Lu) = 8.00
D/S apron length__(Lu) = 20

Constants
Gravitational acceleration (g) = = 9.81
angel of internal friction (φ) = = 40.00
Top width of weir which the water make contact = 2.30
ϒwater = 9.81
ϒmasonary 23
Unit weight of material in KN/m3 KIYA:
ϒsilt 10.84 Considering
condition i.e
ϒRCC 25 are saturate
compacted
FORCE FORMULA
1. WATER PREASURE
1. U/S static Pwh1= ϒw*A = 0.5*ϒw*h*h
Pwv2=ϒwA= ϒw hd * (h)
KIYA:
2. D/S Dynamic P’H= [(ϒ w q/g) (2ghv1)1/2 (1-sin Æ )] + 1/2ϒ wd1d/s o
KIYA:
When
2
curved,like
When d/s sh
P’v = (ϒwq/g) (2ghv1)1/2 cos Æ= weir toy is c
WHERE q= Q/L Unit discarge Ogee weir
KIYA:
KIYA:
When d/s o
curved,like
When d/s sh
weir toy is c
Ogee weir
Is the vertical angle with whi

Æ=
with at the point of water lev
g= acceleration due to gravity =

(2ghv1) 1/2
velocity of flow over curved fa
Hv1= velocity head at d1
2. SILT PREASURE
Psilt=ϒs *h2*(1-sinФ)/(1+sinФ))/2
WHERE ϒs = the unit weight of the silt
h= the height of the silt to be
Æ= angle of internal friction fo
3. Uplift pressure
U1= ϒw*A=gw*d1xB=
U2= ϒw A = 0.5*gw (h+hd) * B
AT THE WEIR TO
1 FOR DYNAMIC CASE
C-1 1.40
C-2 7.89
1. WEIGHT OF WEIR BODY
(Self weight)
C-3 2.60
C-4 9.84
C-5 5.59
2. Silt pressure
Psilt Psilt
3. Hydrodynamic pressure
1. U/S
Pwh Pwh
Pwv Pwv
2. D/S
P'wh P'wh
P'wv P'wv
4. Uplift pressure
u1 U1
u2 U2
sum

 F v
 1 .5
 H F
 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e
 M (  )  1 .5
2 Checking for overturning
 M ( )
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6
v

2 FOR STATIC CASE
C-1 1.40
C-2 7.89
WEIGHT OF WEIR BODY C-3 2.60
C-4 9.84
C-5 5.59
1. Water pressure(U/S)
PH1
2. Silt pressure
Psilt
5. Uplift pressure
U1
sum

 F v
 1 .5
 H F
2 Checking for overturning e

 M (  )  1 .5
 M ()
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6
v

9. WEIR CAPPING
In order to avoid cracking and shearing of the weir, apron and under sluice during over
per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PMi
In order to avoid cracking and shearing of the weir, apron and under sluice during over
per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PMi
Assumed thickness(D) = 200

Diameter of bar = 14
Area of steel = = 566.666666666667
Minimum percentage of steel area in % = 85/fy% where
Where Pmin % = fy= 300N/mm2
Speacing(S) = ast/(Asteel *1000) = 272
where ast = πD2/4 = 153.86
Considering cover thickness of 50mm, effective depth is = 214.517647058824

equal to (Deff = t-(50-φ/2))
Thus, Provide = φ12 @ C/C 20cm

Hence spacing of reinforcement = 271.51764705882
Actual area of steel= = 461.58
Therefore the actual provided steel area is 566.66 mm2/m i.e > 461.58, Provide reinforcement ba
strength of 300N/mm2.for both Operation slab and breast wall.
The spacing of the reinforcement bar should be less than three times t
N.B which is smaller of the two. Effective depth=250mm Hence the actual s
>300mm<750mm.Hence it is ok.
The spacing @ c/c should be account the diameter of the reinforcemen
larger size of the reinforcement is applied during actual operation. This
N.B divide wall with reinforcement size of 14 mm with C/c spacing of 150
provided for the weir, apron, under sluice and Divide wall and check th
information.
But from experience this cover thickness is not enough for weir cappin
N.B abrasion the rebar is exposed hence cover thickness of 70mm is provid
provided for the weir, apron and under sluice. For more check the desi
WEIR CAPPING
10.BAR QUANTITY
Weir body
Discription 29.16 59.23 0.2
mass of 1 m length
dis 10 8601.18374193656 0.6161
lon 10 8601.18374193656 0.6161
1 WEIR BODY AREA

1.1 EXCAVATION
1.1.1 CLAY AND ALUVIAL DEPOSIT
1.1.2 HARD ROCK
1.1.3 WEATHERED ROCK
1.2. STONE WORK
CYCLOPIAN CONCRETE
C-20 CONCRETE 27.32
DESIGN OF THE WEIR
Unit REMARK
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m2/s
KIYA:
Considering the worest
condition i.e the matterials
are saturated and
compacted filled
REMARK
Acts at 1/3 of H
Acts at 1/2 of H
KIYA:
KIYA:
When d/s of the weir is Acts at 2/3 of d1
curved,like
When ogee of
d/s shape weirthe
weir toy is curved like Acts at 1/3 of d1
discarge Ogee weir
KIYA:
KIYA:
curved,like
When ogee of
d/s shape weirthe
Ogee weir
vertical angle with which the d/s curved surface makes

he point of water level produced by d 1.
ation due to gravity = 9.81m/s 2

of flow over curved face (momentum principle)
y head at d1
Acts at 1/3 of H
it weight of the silt
ight of the silt to be deposited= weir height
of internal friction for sandy gravel
Acts at 1/2 of H
Acts at 2/3 of B
THE WEIR TOE

OR DYNAMIC CASE
Magnitude of forces (KN) Moment at "o"(KN.M)
Lever arm in
m
34.96 - 6.80 237.69

197.34 - 6.53 1288.61
64.90 - 5.51 357.60
245.97 - 2.50 614.91
139.85 - 0.50 69.93
-14.55 1.2 -17.046
-120.87 2.3 -282.533

78.94 - 5.12 404.160
-38.91 0.9 -33.840

101.3759459 0.4348048883 44.079
0 0 0.000
0 0.00 0.000
863.32 -174.336651747 3016.983 -333.419917878851
3.22 ok!
9.05 ok!
0.11 ok! 1.000
159.5 ok! 300

128.3
OR STATIC CASE
Magnitude of forces (KN) Lever arm in Moment at "o"(KN.M)
m
32.16 6.80 218.678
181.55 6.53 1185.525
59.71 5.51 328.991
226.29 2.50 565.720
128.66 0.50 64.331
-60.56790138 1.2 -70.9452018164337
-14.5528447628 1.17 -17.046
0 0.00 0.000
628.37 -75.1207461428 24.182666667 2363.245 -87.9914339818883
5.0188551 ok!
26.8576692 ok!
0.6208995 ok! 1
169.8 < 350KN/m2

39.7
R CAPPING
r sluice during overflowing and incoming of boulders, proper capping with RCC is
nimum rein forcement area is taken as 0.85% of the strength of steel. area of steel
ven by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
r sluice during overflowing and incoming of boulders, proper capping with RCC is
nimum rein forcement area is taken as 0.85% of the strength of steel. area of steel
ven by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
mm
mm
mm2
rea in % = 85/fy% where fy steel strength in N/mm 2 , Pmin Pmin %
0.28333333333 0.00283333333333333
271.517647 Take
φ12 @ C/C 20cm Dia

<3*De 643.5529411765 mm Ok!
mm2 < 566.666667
vide reinforcement bars Dia.14mm @ 200mmC/C in both directions.which has yield
s than three times the effective depth or 450 mm,

m Hence the actual spacing750 =
of the reinforcement when Intermediate smaller or

tual operation. This capping should also apply for
C/c spacing of 150 mm. This capping detail is
de wall and check the design drawing for further
ugh for weir capping because after repeated

s of 70mm is provided.This capping detail is
more check the design drawing.
QUANTITY
= 145.412172372 No
= 295.751848062 No
= 59.1503696123 m
= 29.0824344744 m
Total Over all Quantity ---

Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
barr__(Kg)
5299.2849
5299.2849 10598.5697
Pwv
C11 C12
C10
C9 M8
M7
C8
M6
M4
P'wv
C7 C13 Pwh Psl
C6
P'wh
C5 M5
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
C11 C12
C10
C9 M8
M7
C8
M6
M4
P'wv
C7 C13 Pwh Psl
C6
P'wh
C5 M5
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
M1
M1
163920
Retaining walls
DATA
weir wall height = 3.51
The head over the weir = h 3.50
seqent depth D2 4.92
U/s river bed = 1863
Depth of depresion 0.50
D/S High flood level (D/S HFL) 1867.96
U/S High flood level (U/S HFL) 1869.76
Upstream wing wall

Free board = 0.50 m 400
The height of wall is = 7.51 m 4400
Top width 0.50 m
Bottom width 3.51 m
i.e the top Elevation of the u/s retaining wall is
= 1870.51 1870.51 m.
min. 0.94
max. 1.25
Therefore, the max footing height 0.94 1
H V TAN
1 2.5 0.4
Stability Analysis of U/s wing wall
Top width B1= 0.50 m. 1870.51 0.50

Bottom width B= 3.51 m.
H
Height of wall Hs = 7.51 m. Ps2
FoundatioN Thickness t= 1.00 m. V
Ym of masonry gm= 23 KN/m3 7.51 W1
W2
Ys of silt(Fill) gsilt= 17 KN/m 3
Yco of masonry gRCC= 25 KN/m3

Angle of Repose f1 = 30 Deg. 1863.00 W3
Ka=(1-sinf)/(1+sinf) K= 0.33 1862.00
bt =D/2-D 0.50 m bt 3.0050
bh =10-15cm 0.50 m 3.51
Bering capacity of Foundation material

gravel material
300 KN/m2
Forces(KN.m) Lever arm Moment about toe(KN.m)
Item Description Vertical Horizontal
(m.) Resisting
+ve -ve +ve -ve
1. Vertical force
1.1. Self weight(W1) 86.39 0.25 21.60
1.2. Self Weight(W2) 259.62 1.50 389.86
1.3. Silt preasure(Ps2) 191.89 2.50 480.37
2. Horizontal force
2.2. Active preasure (Ps1) -63.9632552 2.50
TOTAL 537.90 0.00 0.00 -63.96 891.82
I) Overturning Stability Fo=SMr/SMo 5.57 Safe 1.50

II) Sliding Stability Fss=SH/SV 0.12 Safe 0.75
III) Overstressing Stability ΣM=Mr+Mo 731.65
e
M  L 
L SM/SFv 1.360191259
L/2
F 2 v 6 1.75
e= 0.3923 safe 0.58
IV) Bearing Capacity P=SV/B(1+6e/B)
Max compression stress at the toe = Pmax = 256.53 Safe 300
Tension develop at the heel = P= 50.40 Safe 100
QUANTYTY
1 U/S RETAINING WALL
1.1 REQUIRED DATA
- LEFT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH = 84 M
- RIGHT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH 69 M
- WORKING SPACE 1M
1.2 QUANTYTY
ITEM AREA(M2) VOLUME
EXCAVATION 46.861615 3936.3757 M3
BACK FILL 19.174541 2933.7047 M3
MASONARY 17.67078 2703.6294 M3
LEAN CONCRETE 0.4505014 68.926708 M3
plastering inerface 1149.4177
pointing outer face 1237.9607
s
m
m.
m.
m
m
m
m
Downstream wing wall

Free board = 0.50 m
The height of the wall is = 5.92 m
Top width 0.50 m
Bottom width 2.87
i.e. the top elevation of the d/s retaining wall is
= 1868.42 1868.42 m
min. 0.74
max. 0.99
Therefore, the max footing height 0.85 1
H
21.801409 1
Stability Analysis of U/s wing wall
Top width B1= 0.50 m. 1868.42

Bottom width B= 2.87 m.
Height of wall Hs= 5.92 m.
FoundatioN Thickness t= 1.00 m.
Ym of masonry gm= 23 KN/m2 5.92
Ps1 Ys of silt gsilt= 17 KN/m 2
Yco of masonry gRCC= 25

Angle of Repose f1 = 30 Deg. 1862.50
1.00 Ka=(1-sinf)/(1+sinf) K= 0.33 1861.50
bh bt =D/2-D 0.50 m bt
3.51 bh =10-15cm 0.15 m
2.67
Bering capacity of Foundation material
gravel material
300 KN/m2
Moment about toe(KN.m) Forces(KN)
Item Description Vertical Horizontal
Overturning
+ve -ve +ve -ve
1. Vertical force
1.1. Self weight(W1) 68.03
1.2. Self Weight(W2) 160.97
1.3. Silt preasure(Ps2) 118.98
2. Horizontal force
-160.18 2.2. Active preasure (Ps1) -39.6603487
-160.18 TOTAL 347.98 0.00 0.00 -39.66
I) Overturning Stability Fo=SMr/SMo 6.03

II) Sliding Stability Fss=SH/SV 0.11
IV) Overstressing Stability ΣM=Mr+Mo 393.44
SM/SFv 1.130624614
L/2 1.43
e= 0.3025
V) Bearing Capacity P=SV/B(1+6e/B)
KN/m Max compression stress at the toe = Pmin= 198.29
Tension develop at the heel = Pmax= 44.53
QUANTYTY
1 D/S RETAINING WALL
1.1 REQUIRED DATA
- LEFT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH 23
- RIGHT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH 23
- WORKING SPACE 1
1.2 QUANTYTY
ITEM AREA VOLUME
EXCAVATION 31.232572 718.34916
BACK FILL 12.158482 559.29016
4654.7248 MASONARY 11.994031 551.72541
LEAN CONCRETE 0.3516243 16.17472
plastering inerface 272.118
pointing outer face 293.08005
V TAN
2.5 0.4 21.801409
0.50
H Ps2
V
W1
W2
Ps1
W3
1.00
2.37 bh
2.87
Lever arm Moment about toe(KN.m)
(m.) Resisting Overturning
0.25 17.01
1.29 207.46
2.08 247.18
1.97 -78.21
471.65 -78.21
Safe 1.50
Safe 0.5
safe 0.48
Safe 300
Safe 300
Divide wall
The divide wall separets the undersluice from the main weir portion and allows a silt free water flow to the head regulator by
pocket.The force components of this strucure is its self weight,silt and water pressures The critical forces are when one side o
other side is free.This critical case is true when water is on both sides of the divide wall and silt is maximum on the undersluice
cantiliver wall consists as shown below.Based on this principle, the analysis is shawn as follow as:
g sub= 16KN/M3
Ym of masonry gm= 23 KN/m2
Ys of silt gsilt= 20 KN/m2
Yco of masonry gRCC= 25 1870.51
Top width of RCC B1= 1.00 m.
Thickness of RCC t= 0.2
Bottom width of masonary B= 2.00 m.
FoundatioN Thickness t= 2.00 m. 7.51
Angle of Repose f1 = 30 Deg.
Ka=(1-sinf)/(1+sinf) K= 0.33
Height of wall Hs= 7.51 m. 1863.00
Yw of water gwater= 9.81 KN/m 2
Thickness of divide wall 1 m.
Bering capacity of Foundation material 400 KN/m2
Forces(KN) Lever arm

Item Description Vertical Horizontal (m.)
+ve -ve +ve -ve
1. Vertical force
1.1. Self weight(fV1) 5.00 1
1.2. Self Weight(fV2) 345.58 1.00
1.3. Self Weight(Rcc cap)
2. Horizontal force
2.2. Rock preasure (Fs) 5.008356
-25.04
2.3. Water preasure (Pw) -36.848979 5.008356
TOTAL 350.58 0.00 0.00 -25.04
I) Overturning Stability Fo=SMr/SMo 2.80 Safe

II) Sliding Stability Fss=SH/SV 0.07 Safe
IV) Overstressing Stability ΣM=Mr+Mo 225.16
e 
M 
L

L SM/SFv 0.6422517613
L/2
F v 2 6 1.00
e= 0.3577 Not safe
V) Bearing Capacity P=SV/B(1+6e/B)
Max compression stress at the toe = Pmax = 363.42 Safe
Tension develop at the heel = P= -12.84 Safe
UNDER SLUICE
Some of the important roles that the under sluice plays are;• It enables the canal to draw silt free water from surfac
• Scour the silt deposited in front of the canal off take (head regulator),• Preserve a clear and defined river channel
Here the under sluice is mainly provided to remove silt deposition and increase the efficiency of water abstracting t
of this under sluice is fixed to be equal to the minimum bed level. But since the river crosection is V shape and the
it should be modified during construction time. but the right side sluice sill level can be equal to the minimum bed
Different literatures show that the size of the under sluice opening is to be designed so as to pass a discharge of 1
base flow which ever greater. However, in this diversion irrigation project considering such criteria is difficult mainl
designer assumed a nominal opening size of one meter by one meter specially giving greater attention for o
installed. The gate should be easy to lift by a single operator. Leaving the complexity of the hydraulic paramete
considered to determine its capacity. To carry out the analysis, pond level case was assumed as the over flowing
proposed for silt scouring during rainy season. Consequently, the opening size of the sluice was checked for its cap
water when the construction is commenced. The Orifice Flow Condition is expected as the stored water upstream o
being squeezed by the breast wall. The discharge passing is computed using the following formula.
LS bottom intake level = 1864.5 m

RS bottom intake level = 1864.5 m
Weir crest level = 1866.50 m
River bed level = 1863 m
LS & RS Water depth = 1.00 m
Canal Free board = 0.2 m
LS Canal Cill level = 1.5 m
LS & RS Canal capacity = 1.25 m3/s
Cofficient of discharge Cd = 0.6
Design discharge Qd = 852.7 m3/s
U/S HFL = 1866.5 m
D/S HFL = 1865.50 m
h (head above center of orifice opening) (L.S) = 1.90 m
Depth of Divid wall = 7.51
Weir height H = 3.50
LS Canal driving head = 1.50
LS Canal depth H = 1.20
Under sluice cill level depth(L.S) = 0.10
Base flow = 0.70 10-
KIYA: 20%Qd
Considered Condition is pond level to be easy in
consider 127.905
order to move by farmer
Capacity of sluice assumed to pass 10times of the canal

capacity = 12.5 m3/s
For one sluce the capacity = = 12.5 m3/s
Assumed Sluice depth d = = 3 m

Width of Sluice W = = 2.5 m
Velocity (V) =Cd*√(2gh) = for left side(LS) = 3.66334274 m/s ok!
Critical Velocity (V) =1.5*Cd*√(d) = = 1.55884573 m/s ok!

Q Cd x A 2gh cd x Lef f xdx 2gh
= 27.4750705 m3/s ok!
under Sluice cill level Left side = 1863.10 m
Top level of L/S under sluice (TLUS) = = 1866.10 m
Spindel length for Left side = 4.00
Scouring gates structural design
The gate of the under sluice is to be vertical sheet metal of 1.1m x 0.75m for the closure of the o
some extra dimensions for groove insertion. Gross area of sheet metals for the under sluice gate
(allowing 5cm insertion for grooves). The grooves are to be provided on the walls using angle iron
the gate openings. The gate (sheet metals) is provided with stiffening angle irons. A vertical raise
under sluice. These gates simply raised by farmers without spindle.
Hydro static preasure(Pa) for left side = 18.64 KN/m2 1.86

Silt preasure(Ps) = 54.00 KN/m2 5.40
Total force 72.64 KN/m2 7.26
Alowabel tensile and bending stress KIYA:

= KIYA:
135.0 N/mm2 13,500
allowabel tensile & N/cm2
bending stress of the steel
For lef side Under sluice during wet condition in
N/mm2 and N/cm2
KIYA:
Bending stress in flat = plate Based on the theory of elasticity
Where of plate bending stress is
calculated using the following
t=thickness of the sheet metal (cm)
formula as per NBR
b/a
P=Hydrostatic pressure (N/Cm2)
recommendations NBR-8883 1.4
K=Non-dimensional factor standards. 1.3
a =minor support length which related with K =
Abera:
For b/A = 1.2 If it is greater than 100kgK = 38.9229 From tabel
use two or more sluices Take
Thickness of the steel plate = 0.73 0.8
Take 7 8
Weight of steel plat gate = gsteel *s*a*b, 506.17 kg

spindle Length 3.35 METER
spindle diameter 0.05 METER
Weight of spindle   D2 51.61 kg

P  L  
4
KN N
Total weight 557.78 kg Not ok!, thus = 8.0248 8024.794

Check
te gate weight, G(KN)=0.667*(B 2*h*H) 0.678
Where B=gate span (m)
h=gate height (m)
H=Head of water over the sill (m)
N.B. In order to protect the gate from large bolderes both intake gate as well as Under sluci gate should be protecte
diameter of bar 22 C/C 20 cm both side
Angel iron to slide the gate

50 50 10 mm
0.05 0.05 0.01 m
BAR QUANTYTY
Discription 3.5571 1 0.2
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing
log no of bar = width-two sides covery/
length of bar dislengh

= log=end to end weir length -
length of bar disbar
= dis. = widht of weir -two sides
Ǿ area lenth volume
dis 12 113.04 3673.1 415207.2
lon 12 113.04 1116 126152.6
to the head regulator by depositing the silt in the undersluice
orces are when one side of the divide is under force while the
ximum on the undersluice side.The divide wall is treated as
1.00
0.2
Fv1
Fv2 Fw
FS
2.00
Moment about toe(KN.m)

Resisting Overturning
5.00
345.58
-125.42 dis
-184.55280406 lon
350.58 -125.42
1.50
0.5
0.33
400
400
R SLUICE
lt free water from surface as much as possible.
d defined river channel approaching the regulator.
y of water abstracting to the main canal through the head regulator from the pocket. The sill level
ction is V shape and the fondation is strong rock left side of the under sluice sill level may vary and
ual to the minimum bed level i.e is 2144.63m
to pass a discharge of 10 to20 % of the peak flood, twice the main canal capacity or five times the
criteria is difficult mainly from economic and operation and maintenance points of view. And the
greater attention for operation and maintenance of the sheet metal gate that will be
the hydraulic parameters of flow through under sluice, ‘Orifice Flow Condition’ had been
ed as the over flowing (high flood flow) condition is so complicated though the under sluice
was checked for its capacity to pass at least twice the main canal capacity so as to divert the
tored water upstream of the weir body rushes through the sluice with the top surface of the flow is
ormula.
1.5
2*MC
Capacity 5* base flow
2.5 3.5 Considered Condition is high flood levell
Capacity of sluice assumed to
pass 10times of the canal
capacity = 127.905
For one sluce the capacity = = 63.9525
KIYA:
consider to be e
order to move b
KIYA:
Assumed Sluice depth d = = 2 consider to be e
Width
Velocityof(V)
Sluice W=
=Cd*√(2gh) = for left = 2 order to move b
side(LS) = 3.254965
Critical Velocity (V) =1.5*Cd*√(d)
= = 1.272792
QCd x A 2ghcd xLeff xdx 2gh
= 13.01986
under Sluice cill level Left side = 1863.00
Top level of L/S under sluice (TLUS) = = 1865.00
Spindel length for Left side = 3.31
Scouring gates structural design
the closure of the opening space. Providing

he under sluice gate will be 1.15m x 0.75m
alls using angle iron frames at the two sides of
ons. A vertical raised gate is designed for the
N/cm2 7500 Kg/cm2

N/cm2 14250 Kg/cm2
N/cm2 21750 Kg/cm2
N/cm2
Kg/m3 KN/m3
k density of Steel 7850 78.5
45.06 unit weight of water 1000 9.81
41.42 Unit weight of Masonary 2300 23
Unit waight of Concrete 2400 24
unit waight of silt 1900 18
All.tensile stress 1400 14
CM
mm 2082.271
Kg
Therefore the designed gate is a bit lighter
802.479364 requiring stiffening beams(angel iron).
gate should be protected by Trashi rack using
18.2855 75
5.5 7
3.6731
1.116
no bar total V deinsity mass kg
18 0.00738467 7850 58.0
5 0.00063076 7850 5.0
Total 62.9
125.8
Discription 8.09 4.9 0.2
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/n bar 40.95 75
log no of bar = width-two sides covery/spacng 25 7
length of bar dis = lengh log=end to end weir length -twosides of c 8.242
length of bar dis = bar dis. = widht of weir -two sides of coveryb +2 5.052
Ǿ area lenth volume no bar total V deinsity
14 153.86 8242 1268114.12 40 0.051295 7850
14 153.86 5052 777300.72 25 0.019044 7850
Total
ondition is high flood levell
m3/s
m3/s
KIYA:
consider to be easy in
KIYA:
m be easy in
consider to
m by farmer
order to move
m/s ok!
m/s ok!
m3/s Not ok!

m
m
Spindell
sheet metal
stiffening beam
sheet metal
stiffening beam
mass kg
402.7
149.5
552.2
1104.3
Peak Discharge, Q = 551
%age = 15
QS = Ka B2 D2 *(2*g*(H-h)) 1/2 , Qs = 82.65
Ka= Coefficient of contraction (1.20), 1.2
Hd= 3.55
D2 =P + Hd, U/S water depth, m 1866.5
He= 2.69
H=He+P 3.69
P = weir height, m 1
h=POND HIGHT= 1
H-h= 2.69
B2 =Qs/(Ka*D2*((2*9.81*(H-h))^0.5 2.747 TAKE, 1m
Hence, provide 2 bays of 1.0m width by 1.5 m depth opening of sluice on both sides of the weir, with 2 piers of 1m width. The
the crest level 1653.5

The bed elevation of the sluice bay is 1m lower th 1652.5
head regulator crest level (canal off take level) 1653
2 piers of 1m width. Therefore the total width of sluice gate = 2*(1.5+2) = 5 m.
Head regulator Design
The head regulator is located on both side of the weir body. The intake sill level is fixed based on route alignmen
elevation to command the possible irrigable area. Hence, the intake sill level is fixed (LS MC at 2.35m and RS MC
minimum river bed level at weir axis. The minimum river bed level and intake levels are 2144.63 and (LS MC 2146
2145.64 m.a.s.l. )respectively. The lean flow was measured on January is 214.9 l/sec as per the local peopel the
decreas from this value.but expecting the river flow will increase significantly during the months of September to
Hence, the main canal on the left and the right is designed to serve an area of 55 and 40 hectares of land Conside
of extension with a design discharge of 132l/sec and 96 l/sec respectively at the canal head. The maximum duty
2.4l/s/ha.The flow through the canal head regulator is supposed to be orifice flow, and hence the coefficient of d
the head regulator, Cd=0.6.
River bed level 1863

Weir crest level 1866.51
N.B The water level (po
Water depth in the canal(RS) =
assumed equal to the w
Water depth in the canal(LS) = 1.00 difference, he, between
Free board 0.20 So the discharge, Qd, th
Bottom intake level(inner)( LS)= 1865.01 determined as follows b
Top intake level (inner) LS= 1866.21
Minimum water in the river 1863.4
Ls MC design Discharge 1.25 m3/s
C 0.6
Under sluice sill level 0.10
Driving head (WCL-CBL) 1.50
- LS MC Driving head 1.50 2
3
Q  * Cd * ( 2 * 9.81) * L * H 2
3
H = Driving head -(Total canal depth/2) 0.90
Left Side Intake

Opening Bed width
Head (h) Area
depth d (m) (b) 2.50
H
Q
B
1.20
1.20 0.00 0 0 0.00 Not Ok
1.20 0.10 0.05 0.12 0.07 Not Ok 1.00
1.20 0.20 0.10 0.24 0.20 Not Ok
0.80
1.20 0.30 0.15 0.36 0.37 Not Ok
1.20 0.40 0.20 0.48 0.57 Not Ok 0.60
1.20 0.50 0.25 0.60 0.80 Not Ok
1.20 0.60 0.30 0.72 1.05 Not Ok 0.40
1.20 1.00 0.50 1.20 2.26 Ok 0.20

Right Side Intake 0.2827433388
0.00
0.00
Take The following Intake dimensions
Bed width Depth H Q(m3/s)
1 Left side Intake dimension 0.70 1.20 0.35 2.26
3 Intake Bed level
Left side 1865.01
4 Top Intake level
Left side 1866.21
5 Driving head
Left side 1.50
Hydro static preasure(Pa) = 8.40 KN/m2 0.08 N/cm2

Silt preasure(Ps) = 15.96 KN/m2 1.60 N/cm2
Total force 24.36 KN/m2 1.68 N/cm2
Alowabel tensile and bending stress = KIYA:
135.0 N/mm2 KIYA:
13,500 N/cm2
KIYA: allowabel tensile & bending N/cm2
Bending stress in flat = stressofofelasticity
the steel during
Based on the theory
plate wet condition in N/mm2
of plate bending stress is
Where calculated usingand
theN/cm2
following
formula
t=thickness of the sheet metal as per NBR
(cm)
recommendations NBR-8883
P=Hydrostatic pressure (N/Cm2)
standards.
K=Non-dimensional factor
a =minor support length which related with K = 1
For b/A = 1.71428571 K= 28.7 From tabel
Thickness of the steel plate = 0.60 0.6 CM

Take 6 6 mm
Weight of steel plat gate 48.98 kg

spindle Length 3.11
spindle diameter 0.05 mm
Weight of spindle   D2 47.91 kg
P  L  
4
Total weight 96.90Abera:
kg ok!
If it is greater than 100kg
N.B. In order to protect the gate from large bolderes both intake gate as well as Under sluci gate should be protected b
use two or more sluices
_________________using diameter of bar 22 C/C 20 cm both side
Angel iron to slide the gate
40 40 40 mm
0.04 0.04 0.04 m
xed based on route alignment and optimal
(LS MC at 2.35m and RS MC at 1m) above the
are 2144.63 and (LS MC 2146.979 and RS MC
c as per the local peopel the discharge may
g the months of September to November
d 40 hectares of land Considering the possibility
al head. The maximum duty for the locality is
nd hence the coefficient of discharge through
N.B The water level (pond level) of the canal head regulator to the weir side
assumed equal to the weir crest level i.e. 2147.63 masl, and the water level
difference, he, between pond level and center half of intake slot is 0.30m.
So the discharge, Qd, through the main canal on the left and the right is
determined as follows by:
3
( 2 * 9.81) * L * H 2
LEFT SIDE INTAKE

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00
H
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.50
0.40 0.40
0.20
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 Q
Bed width of intake Stage discharge rating curve for gate opening
Remark
> 0.0.972m3/s
Kg/cm3 KN/m3
density of Steel 7850 78.5
unit weight of water 1000 10
Unit weight of Masonary 2300 23
Unit waight of Concrete 2400 24
840 Kg/cm2 unit waight of silt 1900 19
1596 Kg/cm2 All.tensile stress 1400 14
2436 Kg/cm2
:
m2
gate should be protected by

Design of operation slab,Masonary suport slap for canal top and Breast wall
To avoid spilling of water during The occurance of highest flood in to the canal, provision of a wall is provided from
top level up to the HFL (i.e. known as breast wall). A vertical raised gate whichi slides over the breast wall-using sp
during opening and clousing is designed for the head regulator. operation slab is also provided at the top of breast
simplicityof gate operation. Breast wall and operation slab are considered to be reinforced wall. Their thickness is s
determined from point of construction rather than the imposed load. the thickness required for the imposed load is
less than nominial value 15cm . thickness considered in this design case is 20cm and minimum rein forcement are
also used. are of steel per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
1. Under sluice Operation slab For the breast wall, the minimum reinforcement area is taken as 0.85% of th
strength of steel.
Assumed thickness(D) = 200 mm
Diameter of bar = 12 mm
Area of steel = = 566.6667 mm2
Where Pmin % = Minimum percentage of steel area in % = 85/fy% Pmin
where fy steel strength in N/mm 2 , fy= 300N/mm2 0.2833333333
Speacing(S) = ast/(Asteel *1000) = 199 199 Take
where ast = πD2/4 = 113.04
Considering cover thickness of 50mm,
effective depth is equal to (Deff = t-(50- = 143.4824
φ/2))
Thus, Provide =  12 @ C/C 20cm Dia
199.482
Hence spacing of reinforcement = <3*De 430.44706 mm Ok!
Actual area of steel= =
339.12 mm2
Therefore the actual provided steel area is 566.66 mm2/m i.e > 339.12 , so Provide reinforcement bars
Dia.12mm @ 200mmC/C in both directions.which has yield strength of 300N/mm2.for both Operation
slab and breast wall.
and Breast wall BAR QUANTYTY
1 BREST WALL Data length width
of a wall is provided from the gate Discription 2.5 3
the breast wall-using spindle dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/
vided at the top of breast wall for
log no of bar = width-two sides covery/spa
wall. Their thickness is simply
ed for the imposed load is not
nimum rein forcement area is
length of bar dis = lengh log=end to end weir length -two

length of bar dis = bar dis. = widht of weir -two sides of
ea is taken as 0.85% of the Ǿ area lenth
dis 12 113.04 2616
lon 12 113.04 3116
Pmin %
0.0028333333 BAR QUANTYTY
2 OPERATION SLAB Data length width
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/


Ǿ area lenth
reinforcement bars dis 12 113.04 1866
or both Operation
lon 12 113.04 1616
BAR QUANTYTY
3 MASONARY SUPPORT Data length width
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/
Ǿ area lenth
dis 12 113.04 1096
lon 12 113.04 996
Spacing
0.2
=length -2*covery/spacing b/ 13 75
= width-two sides covery/spa 15.5 7
=end to end weir length -two 2.616

widht of weir -two sides of 3.116
volume no bar total V deinsity mass kg
295712.64 13 0.003696 7850 29.0
352232.64 15 0.005283 7850 41.5
Total 70.5
For both 141.0
Spacing
0.2
=length -2*covery/spacing b/ 9.25
= width-two sides covery/spa 8


210932.64 9 0.001846 7850 14.5
182672.64 8 0.00137 7850 10.8

Total 25.2
For both 50.5
Spacing
0.2
=length -2*covery/spacing b/ 5.4 75
= width-two sides covery/spa 4.9 7
123891.84 5 0.000607 7850 4.8
112587.84 4 0.000495 7850 3.9
Total 8.7
For both 17.3
Head Work ( weir, Under Sluice and offtake/ Out let Structure)
S.NO ITEM OF WORK UNITE QUANTITY UNITE PRICE AMOUNT (ETH. BIRR)
1 GENERAL ITEMS
1.1 Allow for mobilization L.S 1 120000 120000
1.2 Allow for demobilization L.S 1 48000 48000
Allow for contraction camp and facilities =4*5m2 , Living room for
construction key personnel, CIS and Internally painted chip wood wall,
No 3 80000 240000
Masonry floor cement screened and well ventilated room complete with doors
and windows.
1.3 6*6m2, Store constructed from CIS with doors and windows, Masonry floor
No 1 126000 126000
cement screened
Barded wire fence 50L*20Wm and 1.5m high treated timber post complete
No 1 70000 70000
with 3m wide gate and a CIS guard house (1.5*2m)
Access Road Maintenance cutting to an average depth of 0.3 m, with 6m

1.4 km 5 450000 2,250,000.00
width
Field inspection Road construction cutting to an average depth of 0.3m, with

1.3 km 2 120000 240,000.00
2m width on both sides.
Allow for diversion of Sebat Wedel and reinstate on completion plus all
1.5 LS 1 120000 120000
associated temporary works necessary to construct the weir
1.4 Provision for construction posts for scheme No 1 45000 45000

1.6 Provision of as built drawings for the project LS 1 25000 25000
sub total 1204000 3,284,000.00
2 Head work Structure
2.1 Weir Body
2.1.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 60.612 70.6 4279.2072
2.1.2 Excavation (Hard rock) m3 35.138 201.25 7071.5225
2.1.3 Excavation (Weathered rock) m3 85.035 110 9353.85
2.1.4 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 17.984 2380 42801.92
m3 576.22 1200 691464

2.1.5 Cyclopean concrete (40% C-20,60% GRADED STONE) with (1:2:3 ratio)
Reinforced concrete (Capping) 0
2.1.6 Concrete C-20 m3 88.403 2380 210399.14
2.1.7 Reinforcement bar, φ14 Kg 9092 41 372772
2.1.8 Reinforcement bar, φ32 for weir body anchor Kg 23.379 41 958.526936888889
sub total 1339100.16663689
2.2 U/S & D/S Aprone and Cut off
1 U/S CUT-OFF
Excavation 0
2.2.1 Weathered rock excavation m3 16 110 1760
2.2.2 Hard rock excavation m3 64 201.25 12880
2.2.3 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 32 70.6 2259.2
Stone work
m3 24 1200 28800
2.2.5 Form work m2 24 60 1440
sub total 47139.2
3 D/S CUT-OFF
EXCAVATION
2.2.11 WEATHERED ROCK EXC m3 16 110 1760
2.2.12 HARD ROCK EXC m3 64 201.25 12880
2.2.13 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 32 70.6 2259.2
STONE WORK
2.2.14 CYCLOPEAN CONCRTE (40%X60%) m3 44.8 1200 53760
2.2.15 FORM WORK m2 89.6 60 5376
sub total 76035.2
2 U/S APRONE
EXCAVATION
2.2.6 WEATHERED ROCK EXC m3 32.8 110 3608
2.2.7 HARD ROCK EXC m3 22.4 201.25 4508
STONE WORK 0
2.2.9 CYCLOPEAN CONCRTE (40%X60%) m3
16 1200 19200
2..2.10 FORM WORK m2 8 60 480
sub total 30122.976
4 D/S APRONE
EXCAVATION
2.2.16 WEATHERED ROCK EXC m3 359.4375 110 39538.125
2.2.17 HARD ROCK EXC m3 599.0625 201.25 120561.328125
STONE WORK
2.2.19 CYCLOPEAN CONCRTE (40%X60%) m3 646.1 1200 775320
CAPPING
2.2.20 C-20 CONCRETE m3 92.3 2380 219674
2.2.21 ø 12 RAINFORCMENT BAR kg 5312.3326872 41 217805.6401752
sub total 1406734.1433002
2.3 Divide wall
2.3.2 Excavation (Hard rock excavation) m3 2.573 201.25 517.81625
m3 51.46 1200 61752

Concrete C-20 capping (only the weir side & the rounded surface excluding
2.3.4 under sluice side)
2.3.5 Concrete C-20 m3 16.18 2380 38508.4
2.3.6 Reinforcement bar, φ14 Kg 1104.3 41 45276.3
2.3.7 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 1.19 2380 2832.2
2.4 Under sluice 0
2.4.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m 3
48.412 70.6 3417.8872
m3 7.91 1200 9492

2.4.3 Concrete C-20 m3 1.0508 2380 2500.904
2.4.4 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 125.81 41 5158.21
2.4.5 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 1.10 1500 1650
2.5 Breast wall 0
2.5.1 Concrete C-20 m3 0.85 2380 2018.24
2.5.2 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 60 41 2460
2.6 Operation slab
2.6.1 Concrete C-20 m3 1.02828 2380 2447.3064
2.7 Masonary support slab above oftake
2.7.1 Concrete C-20 m3 0.521 2380 1239.98
sub total 182269.05665
3 Retaining Wall (U/S and D/S)
3.1 U/S Retaining wall
3.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 975.927333333333 70.6 68900.4697333333
3.3 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 12.2373333333333 2380 29124.8533333333
3.4 Masonary(1:3 ratio) m3 336.8326 1200 404199.12
4.2 Compacted Backfill m3 388.152916666667 46 17855.0341666667
5.6 Plastering internal face (to the river side) m2 243.217 61 14836.237
5.7 Pointing external face(to the abutment side) m2 256.37 61 15638.7669420212
sub total 550554.481175355
3.1 D/S Retaining wall
3.3 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 7.817 1500 11725
3.4 Masonary(1:3 ratio) m3 167.417 971.42 162631.898333333
5.6 Plastering internal face (to the river side) m2 140.0 61 8540
5.7 Pointing external face(to the abutment side) m2 147.6 61 9001.95040594599
sub total 236847.773739279
4 Gabion (Protection)
4.3 Gabion (2x1x1m) m3 176.55 1500 264825
Sub Total 268774.452
5 GATES (Supply and installation as per the drawing for detail)
Off take canal gate consists Installation, the gate consists the following
No 2 8000 16000
5.1 parts
6mm thickness sheet metal, 0.7m X 0.7m Kg 46.158 105 4846.59
40X40X10mm angle iron, 1.68 m length
n12mm bar for anchorage, spindel,stiffening angel iron
Handle 32mm steel 1m length…etc
Under sluice take canal gate consists Installation, the gate consists the
No 2 10000 20000
5.2 following parts
8mm thickness sheet metal, 0.85m X 1.2m Kg 128.112 105 13451.76
12mm bar for anchorage
50mm X 50mm Ax 10mm angle iron Stiffening gate head and handle.(etc)
5.3 Trashi racks No 2 4500 9,000.00

Sub Total 63298.35
Total Headwork cost (for new design) 4,200,875.80
Total General Item (For new design) 3,284,000.00
Gran Total (For new design) 7,484,875.80
Perivious agreement Head work Total cost 5,474,209.69
Perivious agreement general item Total cost 3,164,000.00
Gran Total 8,638,209.69
Total reduced cost because of the new design for -----(case-1 according to the Drawing) 1,153,333.89
Bill No.2 Head Work ( weir, Under Sluice and offtake/ Out let Structure)
UNITE AMOUNT
S.NO ITEM OF WORK UNITE QUANTITY PRICE (ETH. BIRR)
1 GENERAL ITEMS
1.1 Allow for mobilization L.S 1
1.2 Allow for demobilization L.S 1
Allow for contraction camp and facilities =4*5m2 ,
Living room for construction key personnel, CIS and
Internally painted chip wood wall, Masonry floor No 1
cement screened and well ventilated room complete
with doors and windows.
1.3
5*5m2, Store constructed from CIS with doors and
No 1
windows, Masonry floor cement screened
Barded wire fence 60*20m and 1.5m high treated
timber post complete with 3m wide gate and a CIS No 1
guard house (1.5*2m)
1.4 Allow for temporary access road to site km 21
1.5 Dewatering of open trenches and excavations, pumps LS 1
1.6 Provision of as built drawings for the project LS 1
sub total
1 Head work Structure
Weir Body ,Cut Off ,U/s and D/s Apron
1.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 1111.46
1.2 Excavation (Hard rock) m3 191.995
1.3 Cart away m3 1303.455
1.4 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 88.711
Cyclopean concrete (60% C-20,40% GRADED
1.5 STONE) with (1:2:3 ratio) m3 1396.886
1.6 Reinforced concrete (Capping)
1.6.1 Concrete C-20 m3 207.71
1.6.2 Reinforcement bar, φ14 Kg 28278.6
1.7 Reinforcement bar, φ32 for weir body anchor Kg 94.72
sub total
2 Divide wall and under sluice
Divide wall
2.2 Excavation (Hard rock excavation) m3 2.573
2.3 Cart away m3 5.661
Concrete C-20 capping (only the weir side & the
2.5 rounded surface excluding under sluice side)
2.5.1 Concrete C-20 m3 16.18
2.5.2 Reinforcement bar, φ14 Kg 1104.3
3 Under sluice
3.2 Cart Away m3 48.412
3.4 Concrete C-20 m3 1.0508
3.5 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 125.81
4 Breast wall
4.1 Concrete C-20 m3 0.85
4.2 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 60
5 Operation slab
5.1 Concrete C-20 m3 1.02828
6 Masonary support slab above oftake
6.1 Concrete C-20 m3 0.521
sub total
7 Guide Wall (U/S and D/S)
7.2 Cart Away m3
578.04
7.4 Masonary(1:3 ratio) m3 681.57
7.5 Backfill m3 513.88
7.6 Plastering internal face (to the river side) m2 454.127
7.7 Pointing external face(to the abutment side) m2 449.897
sub total
8 Gabion (Protection)
8.2 Backfill m3 21.0975
8.3 Gabion (2x1x1m) m3 176.55
Sub Total
9 GATES (Refer the drawing for detail)
Off take canal gate consists Installation, the gate
No 2
9.1 consists the following parts
6mm thickness sheet metal, 0.7m X 0.7m
n12mm bar for anchorage, spindel,stiffening angel
iron
Handle 32mm steel 1m length…etc
Under sluice take canal gate consists Installation, the

gate consists the following parts No 2
9.2
8mm thickness sheet metal, 0.85m X 1.2m
12mm bar for anchorage
50mm X 50mm Ax 10mm angle iron Stiffening gate
head and handle.(etc)
9.3 Trashi racks No 2
Grand
TABLE: SUMMARY OF BILL OF QUANTITIES
Bill Read out Total Corrected Total
DESCRIPTION
No Cost (Eth. Birr) cost (Eth. Birr)
1 GENERAL ITEM 3,164,000.00 3,164,000.00
5,452,449.69 5,474,209.69
2 HEAD WORK
4,498,581.60 4,498,581.60
3 IRRIGATION SYSTEM WORK
13,115,031.29 13,136,791.29
Total
1,967,254.69 1,970,518.69
Vat (15%)
15,082,285.98 15,107,309.98
Grand Total
Bill of Quantities of Sebat Wedel Irrigation Project (lot-1)
BILL NO.1
Description
1 General Items Unit Quantity
1.1 Allow for contractors camp facilities of 4x5sq, m. living room No 3
for key personnel, CIS and painted interior chip wood wall;
Floor of masonry with cement screed finish; well ventilated
rooms completed with doors and windows
6*6m2, store constructed from CIS with doors and windows, No 1

Masonry floor cement screened
Fence of barbed wire around compound of 50Lx20W and 1.5m No 1

high; tightly fixed around treated timber posts; complete with
3m wide CIS gates
1.2 Access Road Maintenance cutting to an average depth of 0.3 m, km 5

with 6m width
1.3 Field inspection Road construction cutting to an average depth km 2
of 0.3m, with 2m width on both sides.
1.4 Provision for construction posts for scheme No 1
1.5 As built drawings of the works LS 1
1.6 Allow Mobilization LS 1
1.7 Allow Demobilization LS 1
Sub Total
BILL NO.2
2 Head work (WEIR BODY)
2.1 Earthwork Unit Quantity

2.1.1 Site clearing for the weir body, apron, wing wall, dyke & others m2 50
2.1.2 Strip 150 mm top soil for the weir body, apron, wing wall, dyke m2 2380
& others
2.1.3 Excavation of Earth for the weir body, apron, wing wall, dyke m3 5949
and others
2.1.4 Excavation in rock m3 959.43

2.1.5 Compacted backfill at the back of wing wall m3 460
2.2 Structural work
2.2.1 Masonry Work
2.2.1.1 Wet masonry for weir body, under sluice, apron cutoff ,wing m3 3021
wall & others on 75mm blinding layer
2.2.1.1 Plaster the required parts of masonry m2 740

2.2.2 Concrete Work
2.2.2.1 Reinforced concrete for deck slab, box culvert & others m3 57
Steel reinforcement for divide wall, breast wall, deck slab, box
2.2.2.2 culvert & others as per the drawing. Kg 3,580
2.2.2.4 C-20 mass concrete m 3
272
2.3 Miscellaneous Work
2.3.1 Gate (Supply and installation as per the drawing)
Trash rack (diam.12mm )
2.3.2 no 2
2.3.3 8mm thickness Sheet metal gate kg 45
2.3.4 off take gate (0.5m x 0.6m), 8mm thickness sheet no 2
metal with double 60mmx60mmx6m angle iron
grooves on both sides and at the bottom
2.3.5 under sluice (0.55m x 0.90m),8mm thickness sheet no 2

metal with double 60mmx60mmx6m angle iron
grooves on both sides and at the bottom
2.3.6 Allow for diversion of Sebat Wedel and reinstate on completion LS 1

plus all associated temporary works necessary to construct the
weir
Sub Total
BILL NO.3
2 Main Canals
2.2 Channel excavation of common material in open to the lines and m3 7,901
grades as shown in drawing, disposal to spoil pits and
spreading, free haul 500m ,Rehabilitation of canal
2.3 Fill for embankments m3 581.1

2.4 Masonry work M3 3000
2.5 plastering M2 7500
Sub Total
3 OFFTAKE STRUCTURES FROM MC to FC
3.1 Structure Excavation

m3 11.26
3.2 Masonry work m3 14.62
3.3 plastering M2 30
3.4 Gates for turn outs and division boxes
3.3.1 4mm thickness sheet metal with double no 28

60mmx60mmx6m angle iron grooves on both sides
and at the bottom.
sub total
5 DRAIN
5.1 Clear topsoil under embankments as directed, average thickness m2 9,000

150mm.
5.2 Channel excavation of common material in open to the lines and m3 750
grades as shown in drawing, disposal to spoil pits and
spreading, free haul 500m, Rehabilitation of canal.
sub total
ITIES
Reasons for the
Difference difference
-
- 21,760.00 Multiplication error
- 21,760.00
- 3,264.00
- 25,024.00
t (lot-1)
Unit rate Read out price Corrected price Differnce

80,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 -
126,000.00 126,000.00 126,000.00 -
70,000.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 -
450,000.00 2,250,000.00 2,250,000.00 -
120,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 -
45,000.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 -

25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 -
120,000.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 -
48,000.00 48,000.00 48,000.00 -
3,164,000.00 3,164,000.00 -
Unit rate Read out price Corrected price Differnce
10.00 500.00 500.00 -
12.00 28,560.00 28,560.00 -
70.60 419,999.40 419,999.40 -
201.25 193,085.29 193,085.29

46.00 21,160.00 21,160.00 -
- -
- -
1,200.00 3,625,200.00 3,625,200.00 -
61.00 45,140.00 45,140.00 -

- -
3,100.00 176,700.00 176,700.00 -
41.00 146,780.00 146,780.00 -

2,380.00 625,600.00 647,360.00 (21,760.00)
- -
- -
4,500.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 -

105.00 4,725.00 4,725.00 -
8,000.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 -
10,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 -
120,000.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 -
5,452,449.69 5,474,209.69 (21,760.00)

38.00 300,238.00 300,238.00 -
41.00 23,825.10 23,825.10 -

1,200.00 3,600,000.00 3,600,000.00 -
51.00 382,500.00 382,500.00 -
4,306,563.10 4,306,563.10 -
- -
- -
75.00 844.50 844.50 -

1,200.00 17,544.00 17,544.00 -
51.00 1,530.00 1,530.00 -
65,000.00 -
3,200.00 89,600.00 89,600.00
-
109,518.50 109,518.50 -
- -
- -
6.00 54,000.00 54,000.00 -
38.00 28,500.00 28,500.00 -
82,500.00 82,500.00 -

MEGECHA Head WORK (Revised) 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MEGECHA Head WORK (Revised) 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DATA SHEET FOR CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE USING THE FLOAT GAUGING TECHNIQUE

Enter data in green cells Calculations are performed in yellow cells

Date: Time at start:

Total Width (metres): 3

FLOAT MEASUREMENTS VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 1

CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE (m3/s) OBSERVATIONS (weather, flow conditions, diffi

Average cross section area: 0.353

Discharge (Flow) (m3/s): 0.700 700.000

are performed in yellow cells Do not change red cells

Staff Gauge at start:

Total Width (metres): 3.2 Total Width (metres): 3.1

VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 2 VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 3

ONS (weather, flow conditions, difficulties experienced during measurement)

1863.000 0.000 0.035 0 0.5 0.00 0.016 0.00

INTERPOLAT FOR QD Tell water depth Velocity

AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE

0.00 0.01 1,867.0

f(x) = − 0.0353201698824484 x + 1864.33694594551

K Value Curve RadiAsymmetricAsymmetricLock

Design of Main canal (left side canal )based on Manning's equation

Calculate A=b*d+md^2 2.000

19 Check for velocity head (Ha) =Ha =V2/2g where

PART-4. WEIR PROFILE DETERMINA

Down stream slope =H : V 0.8

20 4.1. determination of D/S face

21 Up stream profile determination……………. Y =((0.724(X+0.27*Hd)1.85)/(Hd0.85))+0.126Hd-0.

The U/S profile extend up to X=-0.27Hd =

4.2. determination of U/S face

4.3. determination Rivers curve

PART-5. HYDRAULIC JUMP DETER

Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

Stage, H (m) Q (m3/s) He=(Q/CL)2/3 (m)

1863.500 4.74 0.11

PART-6. STILLING BASIN DESIG

Part-7. DESIGN OF IMPERVIOUS AND PERV

Post Jump Height (Y2) =

VALUE UNIT REMARK

2.0 ca/cd=0.995 neglible No Effect on Cd

VALUE UNIT REMARK Values of K & n based

1.188 0 0.594 1.188

-0.472302083518238 -0.708453125277356 -0.944604167036475 -0.944604167

Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

SEE THE REMARK

5.3. Back water curve length(BL)

Tail water depth and Post Jump (m)

4.124 30.404 0.009 8.985

OUS AND PERVIOUS APRON

FINAL OUT PUT

Values of K & n based on U/S shape

-9.94460416703648 -9.94460416703648 -9.44460416703648

Comment USBR & Indian S.basin

A:-LSB > 4Y2 KIYA:

U/s HFL=RBL+H+(He-ha ) U/s TEL=U/sHFL+ha

Condition Recommended basin

D/S HFL = 1867.961

Y2 = #REF! TWD= 4.961

-9.44460416703648 -0.944604167 -0.85 5 7 7 9

D/s HFL=RBL+TWD D/S TEL=D/S

D/S HFL= 1867.96

-4.3 -2.3 -4.8 -4.8

INPUT OUT PUT

7.2. Design of pervious apron (protection work) length