Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JBC M111 281642-1
JBC M111 281642-1
JBC M111 281642-1
Supplemental figures
A 1.0
Adhesion Probability Pa (%) PMN vs. 110 U/ml TNF--stimulated WM9
PMN vs. Quiescent WM9
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Nonspecific
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Contact Duration (s)
B 1.0
PMN vs. 300 U/ml TNF--stimulated HPMEC
Adhesion Probability Pa (%)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0 Nonspecific
0 5 10 15 20 25
Contact Duration (s)
Supplemental Fig. S1. Binding curves of PMN-WM9 (A) and PMN-HPMEC (B) adhesions when WM9
or HPMEC cells were quiescent (squares) or pre-incubated by TNF-(cycles). Data were binned per
contact event upon similar contact durations and presented as the means ± SEs of contact durations. Also
plotted were the predictions fitted using Eq. 1 (solid lines) while the dashed lines represented nonspecific
binding, obtained by fitting Eq. 1 to nonspecific data (not shown for the sake of clarity).
1
A 1.0 B 1.0
PMN vs. Quiescent WM9 PMN vs. 110 U/ml TNF--stimulated WM9
Adhesion Probability Pt (%)
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
Nonspecific Nonspecific
0.0 0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25
Contact Duration (s) Contact Duration (s)
C 1.0 D 1.0
PMN vs. Quiescent HPMEC PMN vs. 300 U/ml TNF--stimulated HPMEC
Adhesion Probability Pt (%)
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
E 1.0
PMN vs. Quiescent MDA-MB-231
Adhesion Probability Pt (%)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Nonspecific
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Contact Duration (s)
Supplemental Fig. S2. The 95% confidence intervals (dashed lines) of the best fitted curves (solid
lines) from experimental data (points) for PMN vs. quiescent (A) and TNF--stimulated WM9 (B), PMN
vs. quiescent and TNF--stimulated HPMEC (D), and PMN vs. quiescent MDA-MB-231 (E). The
nonspecific bindings were presented by grey lines.