Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Elevate Conversion Rates With Targeted Agent Coaching Strategy
Elevate Conversion Rates With Targeted Agent Coaching Strategy
Convin received the opportunity to partner with several businesses across the globe. Despite every business and industry being unique, we
noticed similarities in several processes and challenges. And our Data Labs Team ran into a few common call center challenges. One issue
particularly caught their attention.
60-90 days.
coaching.
2
QA teams are responsible for giving feedback and coaching
existing agents. They leverage manual auditing to evaluate and
give feedback. For instance, agents have a feedback cycle of
1-2 Weeks Feedback Cycle
1-2 weeks, and they receive feedback only on 5-10 calls out of An existing agent receives coaching
500-1000 calls completed. Those 5-10 calls are the average and feedback every two weeks.
calls. Not the calls where agents need attention and feedback.
2
The state of ramp-up time and feedback cycle indicates an How frequently should call center reps be
inefficient and time-consuming agent coaching process. evaluated for call quality?
And sadly, contact center leaders still perceive daily
evaluation and feedback as impossible. Daily 34%
A Linkedin survey conducted by Convin suggests that about
Twice a week 19%
65% don’t believe call center agents can be evaluated and
given daily feedback. See the survey on the right.
Weekly 27%
Despite investing heavily in the coaching process, call center
conversions are low and unpredictable. Once in 2 weeks 19%
Our team carefully investigated the customer data and observed a significant gap in the agent performance evaluation and coaching process.
Here’s a detailed diagnosis of the problem:
01. Poor identification of conversion factors For example, One of our clients’ was initially pressing on “urgency”
Leaders and agents possess little to no visibility/knowledge in their call scripts. At a later stage, they discovered creating sales
about parameters impacting conversions. urgency was negatively impacting their business. Due to a lack of
data, they made a wrong assumption.
02. Wrong judgment of critical conversion factors For example, In edtech, discussion on study material and
Once sales-driving parameters are identified, it’s hard to resources is often given more weightage. But often, the
evaluate which parameters have higher weightage than discussion of discounts and free classes leads to more
others. admissions.
3
03. Poor tracking of agent performance For example, One client evaluated agents for conversions on
With traditional call center audit, agent performance cannot be the basis of 5-10 calls. Whereas agents were making more
evaluated against the sales-driving factors. than 200 calls per month.
04. Deviating from primary conversion goal For example, Initially, businesses start evaluating agents on
Businesses often focus on compliance adherence rather than product offerings, USP discussion, discovery, etc. With time,
rooting for conversions due to poor clarity of conversion- basic etiquette, regulations, processes, company policies, and
driving factors. more start taking precedence over conversion-driving factors.
STEP 1
behavior include-
Sales-impacting behavior refers to agents' strategies, actions,
behavior, and techniques during customer interactions. These
Probing done for more than 100 seconds
parameters can influence the likelihood of closing a sale. The
parameters vary depending on the industry, product/service, Discount offered in the last segment of the call
and target customer demographic.
Online Payment methods offered
Creating Urgency
Discussing product USP on the call
5
lead to conversions action. Here’s a detailed analysis performed by Convin for an edtech
client. Using the analysis, we discovered their business's top
3 sales-driving factors.
Understanding Student Requirements Advocacy of Results Online payment method vs. Payment at
Branch/Center
20 20 20
15 15 15
Conversion Rate
Conversion Rate
Conversion Rate
14.4% 9%
10 11.7% 10 11.9% 10
5
8.3% 7.1%
5 5
0 0 0
No Yes No Yes Online Payment Branch/Center
Understanding student needs resulted in an Sharing student achievement resulted
Offering payment at branch/center resulted
STEP 2
Across Agents
parameters.
Periodic evaluation
Moreover, a few points must be considered Apart from creating a repeatable process that agents can replicate,
while assessing agent performance. agents need to be evaluated on consistent adherence to the sales-
driving parameters.
8
Automated auditing conducted over a while can help understand if agents are developing and learning new skills around sales-driving parameters.
If parameter scores in the call scores start showing improvement, the chances of conversion are higher.
For the same edtech customer discussed above, we saw the following
90%
81.09% 90%
80%
72.67%
“Online vs. Payment at Center/Branch” Score
71.32% 85%
81.67%
70% 90%
79.78%
80% 76.05%
72.80%
65% 85%
2nd week
3rd week
4th week
1st week
80%
76.60%
65%
2nd week
3rd week
4th week
1st week
65.89%
65%
2nd week
3rd week
4th week
1st week
STEP 3
Assign Personalized
Coaching Sessions
The Solution
With the completion of step one and step two, contact center
managers can determine which agent performance actions and Automated coaching helps immensely with the final step by
behavior demand improvement. Managers can assign auto-assigning personalized coaching sessions to agents.
personalized coaching sessions to encourage performance Call recordings of best-performing agents are provided to
improvement.
One of Convin’s healthtech customers invested in call auditing and automated coaching for almost two months. They witnessed an increment in
agent call scores by 16%.
10
Once the last stage is completed, the agent performance Does Coaching completion affect call quality score?
journey doesn't end. With consistent agent coaching, 84.00% 83.60%
82.70% 90%
managers can continuously iterate the first and the second
82.00%
steps. 81.41% 80%
80.00%
70%
This continuous process refines the conversion
AI Score
60%
76.00%
74.90% 50%
74.00% 73.80%
Do agents need manual coaching? 73.60% 40%
72.00%
72.00%
30%
While AI takes care of 95% of the coaching process, a minute
70.00%
knowledge gap may occur in some call centers and impact 3rd week
4th week
1st week
2nd week
3rd week
4th week
1st week
0
(Dec) (Dec) (Jan) (Jan) (Jan) (Jan) (Feb)
agent performance. There might be instances where the
agents need more training to brush up their skills or learn a
completely new concept.
For example, an agent may need to be acquainted with the In such cases, manual coaching performed by managers can help agents.
latest product features and roadmap for next year. With this Managers assign knowledge resources and training videos to individual agents
knowledge, the agents are relaxed and more confident. or all agents. And agents need to complete the coaching sessions in the same
manner as automated coaching sessions.
11
A Brief Introduction to
Automated Coaching
The concept of call center coaching isn’t new. But automation
has revolutionized how businesses coach their agents. In
addition to efficiency, there’s been a dramatic increase in
coaching quality.
Personalized
On-demand
Some automated coaching systems may use gamification Agents with zero markdowns or zero fatal calls
techniques to incentivize agents to improve performance. Agents with the highest call quality score
For instance, agents are awarded points or badges for Agents with the highest customer satisfaction (CSAT) in a
achieving certain goals and milestones. Some examples week.
include - Agents with the highest first call resolution (FCR).
13
Along with call center staff, investing in automated call center software is imperative. The agent performance framework comprising automated
analytics, auditing, and coaching, can break the vicious cycle, enhance agent performance, and generate a predictable conversion engine.
Created by
Convin Data Labs and Marketing