Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sgs Min Tp2003 07 Copper Extraction at Elevated Feed Concentrate
Sgs Min Tp2003 07 Copper Extraction at Elevated Feed Concentrate
ABSTRACT
A number of flowsheets have been designed and operated, or are currently being considered, to extract copper
from leach solutions having much more copper than the 4 g/L levels typically found in heap leach liquors.
Dealing with these solutions has required that the envelope for “normal” copper solvent extraction be pushed
beyond the usually considered limits. Others have published information on flowsheets to recover copper from
leach liquors containing over 25 g/L copper. Secondary solvent extraction circuits are often required to attain
satisfactory overall recoveries. This paper reviews some of the issues faced in three pilot plant circuits that
were operated by SGS Lakefield Research to produce cathode copper from solutions containing 8 to 20 g/L Cu.
The primary objective was to maximize copper extraction using one solvent extraction circuit. The role of feed
acidity and the disposition of impurities such as iron and chloride are considered. The challenges of running short
SX piloting campaigns are discussed.
INTRODUCTION In more recent years hydrometallurgy is finding wider application in the treatment
of complex ores that contain copper. Very often, the plant will need to process a
Copper solvent extraction was originally sulphide concentrate rather than an oxidised copper ore that is readily leached at
developed in the 1960’s to recover ambient conditions. It is probably going to be using more aggressive oxidative leaching
copper from relatively dilute leach methods, for example, oxygen pressure leaching. Higher percent solids are employed
solutions, typically heap leach liquors in the leaching stages both to keep plant sizes as small as practically possible, and to
with copper tenors in the 1 to 4 g/L ensure that the heating requirements of the process are being fully met by oxidising
range. The use of the standard oxime the available sulphur. This results in more concentrated leach liquors with higher metal
reagents has become an accepted tenors than those produced in heap leaching.
unit operation for this application. In
designing circuits to treat 4 g/L copper The leaching processes employed produce solutions containing copper and other metal
liquors, a minimum of testwork is values, for example nickel or PGM, that may be sequentially recovered. Often, the
generally carried out. The two principal overall economic feasibility of the project requires the recovery of more than one of the
reagent manufacturers, Cognis (LIX metals in solution.
reagents) and Avecia (Acorga reagents)
have extensive application databases Copper solvent extraction has been adapted to deal with the leach liquors from a
from which they can draw to predict the number of these flowsheets, some of which have been or are currently operating.
performance of their reagents with a The challenges to conventional solvent extraction posed by leach liquors from
particular copper SX feed. They both have concentrates have been discussed by Kordosky [1] and Tinkler [2]. Compared with heap
software to generate equilibrium leach liquors, the differences can be summarised as follows:
isotherms used to predict staging • higher copper tenors, typically over 20 g/L (and even up to 40 g/L);
requirements. The extraction and • more iron in the pregnant leach solution (PLS), and generally wider range of other
stripping kinetics of oxime-based metals often present at concentrations comparable to copper.
reagents have been extensively
investigated and are well understood by This in turn presents a number of challenges in the design of the flowsheet. A
the manufacturers. Their databases and description of the principal ones, which is by no means exhaustive, follows. Many of
the experience of their personnel allows the factors are interrelated, and will affect other parts of the flowsheet as well each
them to recommend and specify reagent other.
schemes, circuit layouts and process
design parameters.
SGS MINERALS SERVICES TECHNICAL BULLETIN 2003-07 2
For each mole of copper extracted, the HIGH COPPER CONCENTRATION To maintain the water balance, a bleed
raffinate acidity is increased by one FLOWSHEETS must be taken from the raffinate. Copper
mole. Extracting 4 g/L Cu completely, One group of flowsheets has evolved is extracted from this bleed with a
adds about 6.2 g/L H2SO4. Extracting 20 to handle leach liquors with very high smaller secondary SX circuit using a
g/L Cu adds 31 g/L acid. The higher the copper levels, often over 40 g/L. In this side-stream of the stripped organic
acidity, the more the extraction reaction case, the circuit designs do not rely on from the primary circuit. The loaded
is inhibited. Ultimately, with more acid, SX to remove all the copper in one step. organics are combined and stripped
stripping takes place. A solution is to use The primary extraction circuit takes the together. Overall recovery of leached
a stronger copper extractant, one which bulk of the copper, leaving a raffinate metal is not reported in the literature, but
will continue to extract copper at higher that may contain 8 to 10 g/L. This primary ore to metal copper recoveries in excess
acidity, but which in turn requires more raffinate cannot be discharged because of 90% are claimed, along with leach
acid to be stripped. of its copper values. Therefore, it is recoveries of 93%, which would imply
recycled in the flowsheet to a point that the recovery of dissolved copper is
In order to extract more copper, one can where the acidity can be used to do on the order of 96-97% through the SX/
increase the concentration of extractant more leaching. An example of this design EW circuits.
to give more capacity. This can in turn is the Pasminco Metals circuit described
result in more viscous organic phases, by Tyson et al.[3]. This plant leached a More recently, Dynatec Corporation have
particularly the loaded organic, leading matte in an oxygenated chloride sulphate reported in a number of articles [7, 8, 9]
to poorer phase separation performance solution. The PLS contained 40 g/L Cu of on the flowsheet development that they
with increased entrainment losses, and which 30 g/L were extracted using 30% have been involved in for the Las Cruces
increased impurity transfer to the strip Acorga M5640. The 10 g/L raffinate was massive sulphide ore situated near
side. One can operate at a higher O/A returned to the secondary leach stage Seville, Spain. The Las Cruces flowsheet
ratio. In mixersettlers, the best mixing where it was mixed with a stronger acid is somewhat more complex than the Mt.
is obtained when the phase ratio in stream to dissolve more of the matte. Gordon’s, in order to deal with the
the mixers is close to 1. As well, it is The overflow from the secondary leach, particularities of the ore. Like Mt
desirable to operate close to O/A = 1 to carrying the copper and acid from the Gordon, the ore is pressure leached,
be able to set the phase continuity. For SX raffinate, was in turn directed to the but the Dynatec circuit includes a
example aqueous continuous is preferred primary leach where the acidity was two-stage countercurrent leach with
in the first extraction stage where the consumed by fresh matte feed. an atmospheric leach preceding the
loaded organic is produced. Therefore, pressure leach.
the minor (aqueous) phase will have to Perhaps the best known mill currently
be recycled, and the SX circuit size will handling a concentrated copper solution The Las Cruces flowsheet also
be increased significantly. Finally, starting through a solvent extraction circuit is incorporates two SX circuits, somewhat
higher up on the isotherm, it is probably Western Metals’ Mt. Gordon Operation like at Mt. Gordon, with the secondary
necessary to increase the number in Australia [4, 5, 6]. This plant uses SX treating a raffinate bleed stream.
of stages in the extraction circuit, as oxygen pressure leaching to dissolve the Copper, typically assaying in the 22±2
compared with a heap leach operation, to copper values from their chalcocite g/L Cu range, is extracted from the PLS
attain the extraction desired. orebody. It was the first commercial coming from the atmospheric leach
application of pressure oxidation to using a 30% solution of Acorga M5640
An SX-EW operation is an acid plant. leach copper from a sulphide ore. The reagent. The primary circuit employs
It takes copper out of solution and plant flowsheet has been complicated three extraction stages, one scrub and
replaces it with protons which make by various phases of expansion, but two strip stages. The main task of the
their way, via the organic extractant, back essentially involves oxygen pressure scrub stage is to reduce iron transfer.
to the raffinate stream. In heap leach leaching of the ore in SX raffinate. The raffinate, at 1.5 to 4 g/L copper, still
operations the acid is consumed during Pressure leaching is followed by a train contains too much of this element to be
leaching. In a concentrate leach scenario, of atmospheric leach tanks where ferric considered dischargeable. Furthermore,
it may be more difficult to integrate the ion is consumed and leaches a few the raffinate contains 45±2 g/L sulphuric
acidifed raffinate back into the process, additional percent of copper. acid, and as such is a useful source of
as the acid coming from this stream acid for the pressure leach step.
is not necessarily required or may in Copper is extracted from the pregnant Therefore, the bulk of the raffinate is
fact be detrimental in leaching. Various leach solution in Mt. Gordon’s primary directed to the second stage pressure
flowsheets have been developed to deal SX circuit having two extraction and two leach which is carried out on the first
with high copper leach liquors, and the strip stages and using a 23% Acorga stage atmospheric leach residue.
choice depends on how high the copper M5640 extractant mixture. The copper Primarily determined by the water
concentration is and what else is in the concentration is reduced from 35 g/L balance, a bleed of 20 to 25% of the
ore or feed. to 10 g/L. As the raffinate is recycled to raffinate is taken and first sent through
leaching, the contained copper is not the secondary SX circuit to extract
lost, and the acidity of the raffinate is more copper. This circuit employs the
used in the leaching step. same strength extractant but has only
SGS MINERALS SERVICES TECHNICAL BULLETIN 2003-07 3
single extraction and strip stages. The Konkola Deeps circuit, the oxide ore consumes the acidity allowing a second
secondary raffinate is reported to contain SX circuit to operate at much more favorable conditions enabling production of low
in the range of 0.3 to 2 g/L copper. The copper raffinates. In the Pasminco circuit, the copper left in the discharged stream is
overall performance of the circuit is very precipitated out and recycled to the lead plant from where it eventually would get back
much dependent on how much of the into the copper circuit in the copper lead matte feed.
free acidity is consumed in the primary
leach, and on the copper concentration INTERMEDIATE COPPER CONCENTRATION FLOWSHEETS
to primary SX. It is reported that during There has been somewhat less published about copper solvent extraction circuits
the piloting campaigns, when the dealing with feed copper concentrations in the 8 to 20 g/L range. This paper will
primary SX feed contained 20 g/L Cu and present the experience obtained at SGS Lakefield in three different piloting campaigns
14 g/L H2SO4, overall copper recovery which fall into this category. In each case, the raffinate was recycled to another part of
exceeding 99% (of the copper put into the pilot plant flowsheet. However, unlike the situations discussed above for the high
solution from the ore) could be attained. copper feed flowsheets, it was an objective of these copper SX circuits to maximise
copper extraction and to produce raffinates that carried well below 1 g/L Cu, and to do
Another flowsheet that employs two this with a single copper SX circuit.
successive solvent extraction circuits to
handle a high concentration pregnant It must first be noted, that in all three cases, no bench-scale testwork had been
leach solution SX feed produced by two- budgeted for or carried out. While this may not be an ideal scenario for the person
stage leaching has been described by charged with designing the circuit, it is a reality of commercial testing. The solvent
Sole [10] reporting on the piloting results extraction circuits were designed and constructed based on literature data. This
from the circuit tested for the Konkola was augmented in the later two cases, by modeling simulation to predict circuit
Deeps Expansion Project in the Anglo performance that was furnished by the reagent supplier. The copper circuits were part
American Research Laboratories. Here, of larger integrated flowsheets that were being tested. As such, the copper circuits
the orebody contains both sulphide and were largely viewed as “knowns”, having a service function to provide the rest of
oxide zones. The sulphide leach circuit the circuit with recycle streams and in two cases, to provide the client with cathode
produced a PLS containing 60 g/L Cu. copper samples.
This was sent to a primary solvent
extraction circuit that removed 50 g/L The three pilot campaigns corresponding to project work on three different ores for
Cu using a 32% extractant strength. three clients, are identified as G3M, PMMN and LXOX. Table I lists some general
Both Acorga M5640 and LIX 984N were characteristics for the three pilot campaigns. These campaigns were all of relatively
tested. All of the primary circuit raffinate, short duration as had been specified by our clients. The conditions upstream of the SX
still high in copper (~10 g/L) and acid circuit were being changed. Therefore, the feed to the SX circuit was varying almost
(~80 g/L H2SO4), was used to leach the continuously throughout each campaign. This presented an additional challenge to the
oxide ore, thus consuming the acid. operators who had to be supported by timely analytical results.
The oxide ore PLS containing about 6
g/L Cu, was routed to a second SX step
employing 16% extractant to produce a Table 1 General Characteristics of Circuits Operated
final raffinate with a copper tenor
that averaged 0.25 g/L over the piloting CIRCUIT IDENTIFIER GSM PMMN LXOX
campaign. Cu in SX feed (g/L) 8.5-9.7 13-28 13.5-17.5
Total Operating 16 , then 31
1 2
240 300
All of these flowsheets have found Time (h)
ways to deal with the relatively high Cathode Copper No1, Yes2 Yes Yes
concentrations of acid in the raffinate, Produced
by recycling the raffinate back to the
Raffinate Recycled Yes1, No2 Yes Yes
process to consume this acid. Pressure to Circuit
leaching was used in two of the ¹ operated in large cells; ² operated in small glass cells
examples mentioned as an effective
way of consuming this acidity. In the One way to try to stabilise the SX to make their way through the circuit,
other two, the acidity was consumed in circuit feed conditions is to accumulate and for steady-state to be reached. For
atmospheric leaching steps. All the larger homogeneous feed batches and any of the three campaigns discussed,
flowsheets have also found ways to deal campaign these through the circuit. it would be difficult to claim that the SX
with the relatively high copper levels in However, this is often not possible circuit was ever operating under truly
the primary SX raffinates while at the because with a relatively short piloting stable feed conditions. A fine balance
same time maintaining good overall schedule for the overall flowsheet, every must be maintained between minimising
copper recoveries. Mt. Gordon attempt is made to minimise solution SX feed inventory and making sure that
and Las Cruces produce raffinates from holdup in the circuit. Longer holdup feed to the SX circuit is not interrupted
which a bleed stream is taken to a just increases the time required to fill by shortages or upstream shutdowns
secondary scavenger SX circuit. In the the circuit, for any operating changes causing SX circuit stoppages.
SGS MINERALS SERVICES TECHNICAL BULLETIN 2003-07 4
G3M Circuit: The G3M project undertook the strip feed was also increased to promote stripping. This led to an improvement
the development of a flowsheet to treat in copper recovery from 83% to 90% which was better but not sufficiently high to
a copper gold ore that contained both produce a raffinate that could be discharged.
sulphide and oxide zones. The overall
process that was eventually settled At this point in the test campaign, the trial of the rest of the circuit was completed. SX
on was flotation of the sulphide ore, feed solution was set aside and run through a continuous SX circuit that was set up
pressure leaching of a blend of the using smaller glass mixer-settlers. The organic phase from the larger circuit continued
sulphide concentrate with the oxide to be used for all subsequent testwork. The principal objectives were to produce lower
ore, copper SX/EW and gold recovery raffinates and to examine the effect of operating phase ratios and staging on the
from the leach-neutralisation residues by overall extraction. The main change made to the circuit design was to increase staging
cyanidation. to three extraction and two strip. It was anticipated that the feed to SX coming from
leaching would be hot enough to heat the SX system to about 45ºC and the effect of
Two different leaching flowsheet higher operating temperature was also examined in these runs. Operating conditions
configurations were tested during and results can be compared in Table 3.
the relatively short piloting period.
The flowsheet that was ultimately The switch to more extraction and stripping stages decreased the raffinate copper
recommended for further testwork concentration from around 1 g/L to below 0.2 g/L. Extractions as high as 98% were
resembled the Las Cruces circuit without obtained with O/A = 4 in extraction. Changing the extraction phase ratio was very
the secondary solvent extraction. The SX effective in controlling the amount of copper in the raffinate, as the data in Table
raffinate was recycled to an atmospheric 3 show. The result for net copper transfer in run 3-5 agrees with that reported by
leach stage preceding the autoclave. Kordosky [1] at similar extraction recovery.
The solvent extraction circuit was initially Table 2 G3M Circuit 2E 1S Large Mixer-Settler Conditions and Results
set up to operate in conjunction with
RUN 1 2
the rest of flowsheet. Larger fiberglass
mixer-settlers were employed with two Stages Extraction 2 same
extraction and one stripping stage. The Stripping 1 same
circuit had been designed on the basis of Advancing Extraction 3.9 4
a feed containing 9 g/L Cu at a pH
O/A Ratios Stripping 1.9 2
of 2. The organic selected was 12% LIX
984 (Cognis) in Isopar M (Exxon) aliphatic Mixing Time Extraction (min) 2.6 2.7
diluent. Stripping (min) 2.2 same
Temperature ( C)
O
~20 same
This extractant is an unmodified 1:1
Organic Phase ( /O)
v
15/85 same
blend of 5-dodecylsalicylaldoxime
(LIX 984/IsoparM)
and 2-hydroxy-5- nonylacetophenone
oxime. The circuit was operated at Extraction Feed Cu (g/L) 9.6 same
ambient temperature (~20ºC). The feed pH 1.5 2.3
that ultimately arrived at the solvent Fe (g/L) 0.95 0.62
extraction circuit contained 9.5 g/L
Mg (g/L) 20 10.5
Cu at a pH of 1.5. It quickly became
Mn (g/L) 2.9 1.5
evident that raffinates below 1 g/L
were not being produced by this circuit. Raffinate Cu (g/L) 1.6 0.95
The organic strength was increased to pH 1.2 1.1
15% and operating phase ratios were Strip Feed Cu (g/L) 30 31
adjusted. A second run was performed
H2SO4 (g/L) 165 180
in the larger mixer-settler units with
slightly altered conditions. The operating Organic Copper Loaded (g/L) 4.6 5.2
conditions and results for these two Recycle (g/L) 2.5 2.7
initial runs are compared in Table 2 for Copper Recovery (%) 83 90
conditions as they were at the end of
Net Transfer (g Cu/L/(v/O 0.14 0.17
each run.
extractant))
copper concentration and this resulted in Higher concentrations may require the
the step change seen in the graph. secondary extraction circuits that have
been tested in other situations, but the
The data indicate that there appear to practical limits for single circuits have not
be different iron transfer rates for the yet been entirely established. Copper
two reagents that were used. With LIX solvent extraction circuits can function
622N, the electrolyte picked up iron at in a service role in short integrated
a rate of 2.7 g/L per hour of operation. pilot plant campaigns. However, such
This corresponds to ~15 mg of Fe campaigns will not furnish good SX
transferred per L of organic into the strip operating and design data, and the
circuit. For the latter part of the run with process engineer will do better to
Acorga M5640, the transfer rate was consult the extensive databases and
approximately 7 mg/L of organic. These operating experience of the principal
values are net of the iron being bled reagent manufacturers. Evaluation
out of the circuit with the scrub feed and comparison of copper extraction
electrolyte bleed. The result is consistent reagents is not possible in short and
with the reported greater selectivity over unstable operating campaigns, only in
iron for modified aldoximes [1]. They are much longer campaigns under constant
higher than the value obtained in the feed and operating conditions. Less is
PMMN pilot circuit. While the iron in known about extraction in circuits that
the PMMN feed ranged over a broader introduce high levels of other elements
span the average concentration was still such as chloride or iron with the copper
less than half than that present in the feed. It was found that chloride is quite
LXOX SX feed. In the PMMN circuit, effectively controlled by scrubbing.
a reduction step for PGM recovery The data presented indicate that iron
preceded copper SX, while in the LXOX may be of concern in some scenarios
circuit the liquor came from an oxidative and measures need to be tested to
leach. For the little they extract, ferric make sure that it is being controlled at
ion is favoured over ferrous by copper acceptable levels. More work and longer
extraction reagents. More aggressive piloting runs are required to determine
scrubbing of the loaded organic for whether these impurity elements have
example at a lower O/A ratio or with a any longer term effect on reagent
scrub feed containing more copper and/ stability, degradation and crud formation.
or less iron, would probably have helped
to limit iron transfer in the LXOX circuit.
Other measures, such as a reduction
loop in the scrub stage may have also
been beneficial [12].
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES Metallurgical Plant Design and Operating (gold and PGM’s) using the PLATSOL
Strategies Symposium, Sydney, Australia, Process”, Proceedings of ALTA 2002
G.A. Kordosky, “Solvent Extraction April, 2002). Nickel/Cobalt-6, Alta Metallurgical
and Electrowinning of Copper from Services, May 2000, 21 pp.
Concentrate Leaching Solutions I”, D. Dreisinger, G. Richmond, F. Hess and
(Paper presented at Hydrometallurgical T. Lancaster, “The Competitive Position M. Virnig, S.M. Olafson, “Improved
Treatment of Copper Concentrates Short of the Mt. Gordon Copper Process in Iron Scrubbing with a Wash Stage”,
Course, Copper ’99 – Cobre ‘99, Phoenix the Copper Industry”, Proceedings of Proceedings of ALTA 2002 Copper-7, Alta
AZ, October 1999). ALTA 2002 Copper-7, Alta Metallurgical Metallurgical Services, October 2002, 7
Services, October 2002, 15 pp. pp.
O. Tinkler, “Solvent Extraction and
Electrowinning of Copper from R.M. Berezowsky et al., “Pressure
Concentrate Leaching Solutions II”, Leaching Las Cruces Copper Ore”,
(Paper presented at Hydrometallurgical Journal of Metals, 51(12), (1999), 36-40.
Treatment of Copper Concentrates Short
Course, Copper ’99 – Cobre ‘99, Phoenix M. Collins, et al., “Copper Processing in
AZ, October 1999). the Dynatec Miniplant”, (Paper presented
at ALTA 1998 Copper Sulphides
R.K. Tyson, N.E. Meadows and A.D. Symposium, Brisbane, Australia, Oct.
Pavlich, “Copper Production from Matte 1998).
at Pasminco Metals – BHAS, Port Pirie,
SA”, Australasian Institute of Mining and K. Norris, M. Manher, “The Las Cruces
Metallurgy, The Sir Maurice Mawby Copper Plant Process Engineering
Memorial Volume, Monograph 19 Design”, (Paper presented at XI Internal
(Volume 1), J.T. Woodcock, J.K Hamilton, Congress of Industry, Mining and
editors, The Australasian Institute of Metallurgy, Zaragoza, Spain,
Mining and Metallurgy, 1993, 723-725. June 2002).
Hydrometallurgy 2003 – Fifth International Conference in Honor of Professor Ian Ritchie © 2011 SGS. All rights reserved. The information contained
Volume 2: Electrometallurgy and Environmental Hydrometallurgy herein is provided “as is” and SGS does not warrant that it
Edited by C.A. Yound, A.M Alfantazi, C.G. Anderson, D.B. Dreisinger, B. Harris and A. James will be error-free or will meet any particular criteria of per-
TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials, Society), 2003 formance or quality. Do not quote or refer any information
herein without SGS’ prior written consent. Any unautho-
rized alteration, forgery or falsification of the content or
appearance of this document is unlawful and offenders
CONTACT INFORMATION may be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Email us at minerals@sgs.com
WWW.SGS.COM/MINERALS
SGS Technical Paper #2003-07