Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Model Structure (GS IV Case Study Test - 07) 27-06-2023
Model Structure (GS IV Case Study Test - 07) 27-06-2023
(1)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
Whistleblowing :
Organisational integrity is one of the basic requirements of an employee but if it comes at the cost of
crime then it needs violation. The whistleblowing can spoil the image of the company and can create
losses. But the bigger issue needs to be highlighted.
Human rights :
Every person has a right to work in a safe working environment without being harassed or discriminated
against. By taking back the FIR you will be making other colleagues vulnerable to the sexual predator.
Following options are available to the woman employee:
Continue with her case by taking a firm stand against the company management.
This would give her a fair chance to prove her viewpoint in a court of law and will give her mental
peace that she stood for herself.
However, she will have to face mental agony and societal pressure in pursuing the case and may even
prove detrimental for her career prospects.
Accept the negotiation offer by the company and withdraw the case.
This may be beneficial for her career and will save her from the rigorous investigation process.
However, this would create dissonance and affect mental peace as her conscience would not allow
her to accept monetary gains over self-respect. Also, she would never be able to stand for herself in
the future.
Resign from the company and focus on other career opportunities.
This will let her avoid the situation and will be beneficial for her career prospects.
However, the scars of sexual harassment will remain with her throughout her life and she will regret
that she herself is responsible for the denial of justice to her.
The correct course of action :
Option(1) seems to be the correct way of handling the situation. The women employee can play a
leadership role. Her actions will give voice to other genuine concerns of women employees. It is her
moral responsibility to come forward and show exemplary behavior. This will not only bring self-
satisfaction to her but also increase her confidence and inner strength.
Also, there is a major fault of company management in giving priority to profit motives by saving the
marketing executive and not forming the internal complaints committee as mandated by the Sexual
Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030 Modle Structure
(2)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
Q.2. A state has been struck with floods and there is immense anger and frustration among people
regarding delay in flood relief measures. A reason for the anger is that immediate relief is directed
towards localities where the local MLA and MP (belonging to the ruling party) reside. There have
been incidents where people have physically attacked the relief personnel. It is winter and there
is a threat of adverse weather in the coming week. You have been brought in as the new District
collector as the previos one was transferred due to public pressure on the political leadership.
Your senior has directed you to give special attention towards the same locality where the loyal
voters of the MLA and MP live.
In this background :
1. Bring out the ethical issue involved in the above case.
2. Also suggest the right course of action in the given situation.
(250 words, 25 Marks )
Answer :-
Facts:
A state struck with floods and an adverse weather following Relief operations marred with undue intervention
of elected representatives Public anger and frustration leading to transfer of previous District Collector.
Stakehloders:
1. People from the Affected locality
2. The Govt and Administration
3. Local MP and MLA
4. Me and the relief personnels
Ethical Issues Involved :
1. Carrying out relief operation without favoritism.
2. Discharging duty according to rule of law
3. Assuaging fear of the general public amicably
4. Protecting the relief personnels
This case study involves the classic case of conflict between populist interests of the elected representative
and the duty of the selected official. Here it is imperative that the relief operations are carried out
effectively to deliver the desired services that the govt owes to people so as to prevent a humanitarian
crisis arising out of flood and possible exacerbation due to an impending bad weather. Further as the
District Collector it is my duty to uphold the ethics of administration by providing an impartial service
to all by not succumbing to any external pressures .
Modle Structure Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030
(3)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030 Modle Structure
(4)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
Answer :-
(a) What preventive steps would you take to stop flaring up of a brewing dispute?
I would take the information about such a dispute seriously and promptly without losing time will call
all the leaders of the groups to amicably find a solution.
If they are adamant to move for amicable solution then I will take the disputed land into administration’s
custody till a solution is reached through negotiation or a law suit, and meanwhile
I would assure the leaders of the respective communities to provide them suitable space for their icons
if it would be legally tenable or failing which even by commercial procurement of land.
Even then if they continue agitation and there are chances of violence (intelligence information). I
would detain the leaders who are known along with miscreants in the region. I would also implement
Art 144.
(b) If the dispute flares up and turns violent, what would be your quick measures to contain it?
In a flared up situation, I would act from mild use to increased use of state power, especially from
water cannons to tear gas or to fire in air or even firing at the lower parts of body if the need arises for
deterrence.
In such situations permissible harm for greater public cause (to save life and property) needs to be
resorted.
While doing these, I would strictly ensure that agitators are controlled, not killed.
(c) How do you react when failure to pre-empt and contain such a situation leads to your
suspension?
It is an imaginative outcome whose possibility could not be ruled out.
Generally each of the steps taken would be recorded in writing and also I would apprise the people
around in the administration as well as peaceful agitators about the actions being taken in a SOS
situation. That may help me in proving that I followed due process of law and acted in careful manner,
trying to save a situation rather than being rash and vengeful.
Even if I am suspended, my right and transparent approach would eventually absolve me proving my
right intention for establishing peace and security.
Q. 4. The Supreme Court has banned mining in the Aravalli Hills to stop degradation the forest cover
and to maintain ecological balance. However, the stone mining is still prevalent in the border
district of the affected State with connivance of certain corrupt forest officials and politicians.
Young and dynamic SP who was recently posted in the affected district promised to himself to stop
this menace. In one of his surprise checks with his team, he found loaded truck with stone trying
to escape the mining area. He tried to stop the truck but the truck driver overrun the police
officer, killing him on the spot and thereafter managed to flee. Police filed FIR but no breakthrough
Modle Structure Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030
(5)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
was achieved in the case for almost three months. Ashok who was the Investigative Journalist
working with leading TV channel, suo moto started investigating the case. Within one month,
Ashok got breakthrough by interacting with local people, stone mining masia and government
officials. He prepared his investigative story and presented to the CMD of the TV channel. He
exposed in his investigative report the complete nexus of stone mafia working with blessing of
corrupt police and civil officials and politicians. The politician who was involved in the mafia was
no one else but local MLA who was considered to be very close to the Chief Minister. After going
through the investigative report, the CMD advised Ashok to drop the idea of making the story
public through electronic media. He informed that the local MLA was not only the relative of the
owner of the TV channel but also had unofficially 20 percent share in the channel. The CMD
further informed Ashok that his further promotion and hike in pay will be taken care of in addition
the soft loan of 10 lakhs which he has taken from the TV channel for his son’s chronic disease will
be suitably adjusted if he hands over the investigative report to him.
(a) What are the options available with Ashok to cope up with the situation?
(b) Critically evaluate/examine each of the options identified by Ashok.
(c) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by Ashok?
(d) Which of the options, do you think, would be the most appropriate for Ashok to adopt and
why?
(e) In the above scenario, what type of training would you suggest for police officers posted to
such districts where stone mining illegal activities are rampant?
(250 Words, 25 Marks)
Answer :-
This case study seems similar to Surender Singh, a 59-year-old deputy superintendent of police (DSP) was
run over by a dumpster while trying to stop mining activities near Pachgaon village in Haryana on July 19,
2022.
Stakeholders :
Corrupt officials and politicians
SP
Ashoka (Journalist)
Police officals
CMD of the TV channel
Mining Mafias
Judiciary
Local MLA
Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030 Modle Structure
(6)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
Local People
Chief Minister
(a) The options available with Ashok to cope up with the situation are:
1. To hand over the investigative report to the CMD of the TV channel and receive benefits in return.
2. To leak the investigative report to a different media house or publish it independently.
3. To keep the investigative report to himself and not disclose the findings to anyone.
(b) Each of the options can be evaluated as follows:
1. Handing over the investigative report to the CMD of the TV channel in exchange for personal benefits
is an unethical act. It compromises the integrity of the investigative report and undermines the public
interest that the report aimed to serve. Additionally, Ashok will be vulnerable to blackmail in the future,
and his credibility will be called into question. This option is not suitable for Ashok.
2. Leaking the investigative report to a different media house or publishing it independently will help
expose the corrupt nexus involved in the stone mining mafia. This option will serve the public interest
and promote transparency and accountability. However, it may also lead to legal consequences and
put Ashok’s safety at risk.
3. Keeping the investigative report to himself is not desirable since the report is in the public interest. The
corrupt nexus involved in the stone mining mafia will continue to operate, and the people will be left in
the dark. This option is not suitable for Ashok.
(c) The ethical dilemmas faced by Ashok are:
1. To prioritize public interest over personal gain.
2. To take responsibility for the consequences of his actions.
3. To maintain the integrity of his investigative report.
4. To ensure his own safety while reporting on sensitive issues.
(d) Leaking the investigative report to a different media house or publishing it independently would be the
most appropriate option for Ashok to adopt. This option will serve the public interest, promote
transparency and accountability, and expose the corrupt nexus involved in the stone mining mafia.
However, Ashok should take precautions to protect his safety and be prepared to face legal consequences
if required.
(e) Police officers posted to such districts should receive training on the following :
1. Identification of illegal mining activities and the methods used by the mining mafia to evade the law.
2. Legal provisions related to mining and environmental protection.
3. The role of the police in enforcing the law and preventing illegal mining activities.
4. Developing strategies to work with the community to gather intelligence on illegal mining activities.
5. Developing skills in investigation and evidence collection related to mining offenses.
The training should also focus on the ethical dimensions of law enforcement and the importance of upholding
the rule of law.
Modle Structure Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030
(7)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
Q. 5. You have done MBA from a reputed institution three years back but could not get campus placement
due to COVID-19 generated recession. However, after a lot of persuasion and series of competitive
tests including written and interview, you managed to get a job in a leading shoe company. You
have brought your parents who are dependent and staying with you. You also recently got married
after getting this decent job. You were allotted the Inspection Section which is responsible for
clearing the final product. In first one year, you learnt your job well and was appreciated for your
performance by the management. The company is doing good business for last five years in
domestic market and this year it is decided even to export to Europe and Gulf countries. However,
one large consignment to Europe was rejected by their Inspecting Team due to certain poor quality
and was sent back. The top management ordered that bid consignment to be cleared for the
domestic market. As a part of Inspecting Team, you observed the glaring poor quality and brought
to the knowledge of the Team Commander. However, the top management advised all the members
of the team to overlook these defects as the management cannot bear such a huge loss. Rest of
the team members except you promptly signed and cleared the consignment for domestic market,
overlooking glaring defects. You again brought to the knowledge of the Team Commander that
such consignment, if cleared even for domestic market, will tarnish the image and reputation of
the company and will be counter-productive in the long run. However, you were further advised by
the top management that if you do not clear the consignment, the company will not hesitate to
terminate your services citing certain innocuous reasons.
(a) Under the given conditions, what are the options available to you as a member of the Inspecting
Team?
(b) Critically evaluate each of the options listed by you.
(c) What option would you adopt and why?
(d) What are the ethical dilemmas being faced by you?
(e) What can be the consequences of overlooking the observations raised by the Inspecting
Team?
(250 Words, 25 Marks)
Answer :-
The given case study enumerates a fairly common problem that working professionals face across sectors
and industries. Further, the issue in this case study has a near-universal relevance and applicability.
(a) As a member of the Inspecting Team, the options available to me are:
1. Clear the consignment despite the poor quality.
2. Refuse to clear the consignment and risk losing my job.
3. Report the issue to higher authorities outside of the company.
Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030 Modle Structure
(8)
Mahesh Shinde’s Mahesh Shinde’s R
Modle Structure Office Address : 7th Floor T.C.G Square, Opposite to Alka Talkies, Tilak Road, Pune - 411030
(9)