Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Audit Audit

Type of Waste Waste Identification Criteria Target V a l u e


as found as left

1 . Defects S i m i l a r parts placed next to each other zero 0 0


A ddi ti o n a l tests i n workflow zero 0 0
N u m b e r of SOPs per process l 0 0
Perform tasks Right-First-Time �95 % 0 0
A v a i l a b l e parts match task order �99 % 0 0
2. Over- Producing too m u c h or m a k i n g items e a r l i e r or

Production faster than is required by the actual d e m a n d zero 0 0

3. Waiting T i m e Setup- and change-over time < l O min 0 0


Overlapping manpower cycles (uninterruptible)
zero 0 0

Employee waiting u n t i l end of a measurement zero 0 0


Employee waiting for a device or an instruction
zero 0 0

Device waiting for employee zero 0 0


Employee waiting for parts, c h e m i c a l s or
zero 0 0
results

4. Non-engaged Each employee is involved i n the C o n t i n u o u s


�95 % 0 0
Employees Improvement Process (CIP)

Each employee knows his/her d a i l y tasks and


100% 0 0
priorities

E m p l o y e e ' s last s k i l l assessment < l year 0 0


E m p l o ye e ' s last t r a i n i n g course < l year 0 0
5. Transport Unnecessary u n p a c k i n g or r e - f i l l i n g ::; 3 % 0 0
Repacking or moving parts, c h e m i c a l s or
zero 0 0
devices between workplaces

Selecting parts or c h e m i c a l s more than once i n


l 0 0
a workflow

6. Inventory I d l e tools and e q u i p m e n t zero 0 0


T i m e frame for inventory of s m a l l
< 2 days 0 0
parts/consumables

Inventory of large parts/consumables or


centralized 0 0
chemicals

Inventory o r g a n i z e d u s i n g Kanban yes 0 0

23/05/2018

30474321A
Audit Audit
Type of Waste Waste Identification Criteria Target V a l u e
as found as left

7. Motion Steps walked between each workflow task up to 2 0 0


N u m b e r of zones on workbench ::; 3 0 0
N u m b e r of tools used i n workflow ::; 3 0 0
Distance covered performing a l l tasks i n
80 cm 0 0
workflow

Non added-value time (unnecessary) ::; 3 3 % 0 0


8. Extra Steps not i n documentation or SOP
zero 0 0
Processing

Steps introduced temporarily zero 0 0


"Suspects" extra-processing actions zero 0 0
Duplicated steps zero 0 0

TOTAL SCORE for a l l 8-Wastes I d e n t i f i c a t i o n (max. 32) 0 0

Interpretation of Total Score:

=? 30 Outstanding! Strong 8-Wastes identification culture i n place

21 - 29 S o l i d 8-Wastes identification focus with room for improvement

s 20 Potential for improvement

23/05/2018

30474321A

You might also like