Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classroom Disciplines
Classroom Disciplines
Classroom Disciplines
Overview
The sections in this unit are:
Can you define the term classroom discipline? You might begin: 'Classroom
discipline exists when .,.", Then look at a possible definition below and compare it
to your own.
Defining terms
For most teachers the phrase classroom discipline has an immediate and clear
meaning, but in fact it is quite a complex concept, and hard to define.
Imagine a classroom that is well disciplined. Then look at the statements below,
and note by each one how true it is of the situation you imagine. Add any comments
or questions in the margin. Then read on.
Comment
1. Learning is taking place. The question of the relationship between discipline
and learning is crucial. It seems fairly clear that in a discIplined classroom it is
easier to activate students in the way you want, and that time will be probably
spent on-task, rather than wasted on organizational problems or disruptive
behaviour. However, I have seen well-disciplined classes in which little or
no learning was taking place, simply because the tasks had themselves little
learning value (see Unit 4: The task, p. 43). $0 a disciplined classroom does
not, in itself, necessarily cause learning to take place. On the other hand, the
converse is probably nearer the truth: there is unlikely to be much learning in a
totally undisciplined classroom.
We might sum up by saying that discipline is a necessary, but not sufficient,
condition for good learning to take place.
2. It is quiet. It is easy to claim that this is irrelevant. What about well-disciplined
classes where noisy pair- or group work is going on? However, think about the
following points. First, cooperative work involving talk takes up only a part
of lesson time, probably a minority - what about the rest? Second, imagine
walking down the corridor of a school, listening at the door of each classroom,
and hearing noise in some and quiet in others. If you had to guess which were
the better-disciplined ones, what would you say?
The bottom line is that disciplined classes mayor may not be quiet, but
undisciplined ones are always noisy. Therefore, there is arguably a positive
association between quietness and discipline. The teacher needs to ensure that
the class is quiet enough for students to hear the teacher and each other, and
to complete tasks without being disturbed.
3. The teacher is in control. Yes, definitely. However, the fact that a teacher
is in control does not necessarily mean that he or she is standing in front of
the class telling everyone what to do. The students may have been given the
initiative in a particular activity. Nevertheless, it was the teacher who took the
decision about the handover of initiative, and he or she may, at any point, take
it back. As it is often said, 'The classroom is not a democracy.' The underlying
responsibility for the control of any disciplined classroom has to be in the
hands of the teacher. How authoritarian or liberal, rigid or flexible he or she is
in using this control is another question.
4. Teacher and students are cooperating smoothly. A smooth-running lesson
is the.main evidence of discipllne in the classroom, and the participants have
to cooperate to produce this. Such smooth cooperation may occur because
Classroom management skills. Such skills include things like knowing how to
organize the beginning of a lesson, for example, or how to get students to raise
their hands instead of shouting out answers, or how to get students smoothly in
and out of group work.
too childish or too sophisticated, then the immediate result will be discipline
problems.
Good interpersonal relationships. This does not mean that you have to love - or
even necessarily like - your students! But it does mean that you need to maintain
an attitude of respect and goodwill towards them, and try to encourage similar
attitudes between the students themselves.
Good planning. A carefully and clearly organized lesson is likely to contribute to
good discipline, as described above. It is not enough just to mark the sections of
the coursebook you intend to dol (See Unit 2: The lesson, pp. 21-6.)
Student motivation. This is a key factor, and one that can be enhanced by
teacher action. The more interesting and motivating the learning activity, the
more likely it is that students will be cooperative and stay on-task (see Unit 4: The
task, pp. 51-5).
Have a look at the advice for beginner teachers below. Can you find at least one
example that is related to each of the factors discussed above?
Read through the list and decide which are the ten most important for you. You can,
of course, add any you think are missing. If you are working in a group, compare
your answers with those of other participants. If you are working alone, try to find an
experienced teacher to compare notes with.
The first 20 items above are listed in order of importance, according to the original
respondents' opinions. In other words, the most useful ten tips for them were
items 1-10. I personally agree with most of the original respondents' priorities,
but not all. Your own list, if you did the task, was also probably different. The
choices made by an individual depend very much on personal experience and an
awareness of one's own strong and weak points as a teacher.
Below are some useful practical principles for dealing with problems with student
behaviour in class. These are based on my own experience as a teacher who had
to learn the hard way how to teach unruly classesof adolescents in a country to
which I was an immigrant, and whose language I did not speak very well. They
are, therefore, most relevant to this age group, but they may also be found useful
when dealing with younger or older students.
17 Classroom dls~lpllne
As you read, can you recall incidents from your own experience as a student or as a
teacher of the use of strategies similar to the ones d~scribed here?
e Plan the lesson carefully. When a lesson is clearly planned and organized,
there is likely to be constant momentum and a feeling of purpose, whJch
keep students focused on the current task. This prevents gaps when nothing
particular is going on, which may be filled by distracting or counterproductive
activity. Moreover, the awareness that there is a clear plan contributes a
great deal to your own confidence, and to your ability to win the trust of the
students.
• Instruct clearly. Problems often arise due to student uncertainty about what
they are supposed to be doing. Even though instructions take up a very small
proportion of lesson time, they are crucial. You need to clarify precisely what
the task involves and what the options are (see Unit 4: The task, pp. 49"':51).
This is not incompatible with student-teacher negotiation about what to
do. However, too much hesitation and mind-changing can distract and bore
students, and reduce their confidence in the teacher's authority, with obvious
Implications for dtsclpline.
• Keep in touch. You need to be sensitive to what students are doing. 'Scan' the
. classroom constantly so that you can immediately pick up any lack of attention
on the part of individual students. This achieves two things. First, students
know you are aware of them all the time, which encourages participation and
personal contact on the one hand, and discourages deviant activity on the
other. Second, you are able to notice immediately if a student loses interest or
gets distracted and do something about it before it becomes a problem.
• 'Explode' yourself. Often a quick, loud command will do the trick, with a
display of anger. This is provided, of course, that you do not really lose your
temper or become aggressive I The trouble with displaying anger is that you
cannot do it too often, or it loses its effect.
• Give in. For example, if students refuse to do homework you might say, 'All
right, don't. Instead, let's ... ' This is a perfectly respectable option, which is
unfortunately rejected by many teachers who feel they risk losing face. Its
advantage is that it immediately defuses the situation and, if done quickly and
decisively, will not be seen as dishonourable surrender! It also puts you in a
position to demand something from them in return! But again, it cannot be
used too often.
• Make them an offer they can't refuse. Sometimes you find that students are
pushing you into a confrontation, and you cannot give in but do not wish to
impose your decision by assertive commands. You need to look for a way of
avoiding the confrontation by one of the following strategies: postponement
(Let's come back to this tomorrow at the beginning of the lesson. Remind
me.'); compromise ('J'll tell you what: you have to do all the assignments, but
I'll give you extra time to finish them ... '); or arbitration (Let's discuss this
with the class teacher, and accept his or her decision ... ').
• Call in assistance from a higher authority. Calling in the class teacher,
school principal or other authoritative figure may appear to lessen your own
authority. However, if none of the previous strategies have worked, then it is
better to call for help than to let the situation escalate. This is particularly true
if you have a situation of bullying or violence between students. If you do this,
then make sure that later you hold a follow-up discussion with the class in
order to come to an agreement with them on measures to prevent the problem
from happening again.
Read through the descriptions of episodes and think about or discuss the following
questions with colleagues:
- Once it had arisen, what would you advise the teacher to do?
Episode 1 .
The teacher of a mixed-level class of 13-year-olds is working through a class reader
in an English lesson. He asks Terry to read out a passage. 'Do we have to do this
book?' says Terry. 'It's boring.' Some members of the class smile, one says 'I like it',
others are silent awaiting the teacher's reaction.
(Wragg, 1981, p.12)
Episode 2
The teacher is explaining a story. Many of the students are inattentive, and there
is a murmur of quiet talk between them. The teacher ignores the noise and speaks
to those who are listening. Finally she reprimands, in a gentle and sympathetic
way, one student who is talking particularly noticeably. The student stops talking
for a minute or two, and then carries on. This happens once or twice more, with
different students. The teacher does not get angry, and continues to explain,
trying (with only partial success) to draw students' attention through occasional
questions.
(Adapted from Sarah Reinhom-Lurie, unpublished research project on classroom
discipline, Oranim School of Education, Haifa, 1992.)
Episode 3
The teacher has prepared a worksheet and is explaining how to do it. His
explanation has carried on so long that John, having lost interest, begins to tap
a ruler on his desk. At first the tapping is occasional and not too noticeable, but
John begins to tap more frequently and more noisily, building up to a final climax
when he hits the table with a very loud bang. The class, startled by the noise, falls
silent and looks at both John and the teacher to see what will happen.
(Adapted from Wragg, 1981, p.18.)
Episode 4
The teacher begins by giving out classroom books and collecting homework
books.
Teacher (to one of the boys): This book's very thin.
Boy 1: Yeah, 'tis, isn't it.
Boy 2: He's been using it for toilet paper, sir.
(Uproar)
(Adapted from Wragg & Wood, 1981, p. 32.)
Episode 5
The students have been asked to interview each other for homework and write
reports. In this lesson they are asked to read aloud their reports. A few students
refuse to do so. The teacher tells these students to stand up before the class and be
interviewed by them. They stand up, but do not take the questions seriously. They
answer with jokes, or in their Ll, or not at all. The teacher eventually sends them
back to their places and goes on to the next planned activity, a textbook exercise.
(Adapted from Sarah Reinhorn-Lurie, unpublished research project on classroom
discipline, Oranlm School of Education, Haifa, 1992.)
Comment
Episode 1 (Terry refuses to read, says the book is boring). The causes of this
were, possibly, that the book is indeed boring; Terry is looking for a way to avoid
reading aloud; or he simply wants to challenge the teacher and take a break from
work. It is difficult to see how the teacher could have foreseen or prevented the
incident. Now the priority is to neutralize the challenge and get the class back
on task. The most appropriate answer to Terry's question is a postponement: 'Yes,
we do have to do this book; we'll discuss whether it's boring later. Please read.'
This commits the teacher to discussing the book later with the class, allowing
also those students who like it to express an opinion. But this discussion will be
initiated and managed by the teacher, which is a totally different situation from
what would have happened had the teacher allowed him- or herself to be drawn
into an argument in the original lesson.
Another secondary question arises here, and that is whether we should insist on a
student reading aloud if he or she doesn't want to. In this case, Terry did not actually
say he didn't want to rend, but this may have been the underlying reason for his
comment. You may, as suggested above, insist on the nominated student reading,
with no exceptions. But there may be very good reasons for allowing students not
to read aloud if they don't want to (and reading aloud is of questionable learning
value; see Unit 10: Teaching reading, p. 135). This has to be part of the 'ground
rules', a legitimate choice for the student as to whether he or she reads aloud or not.
It may be better to adopt such a ground rule than to face constant battles with those
students who hate reading aloud and try to refuse to do it.
Episode 2 (students keep chatting during teacher explanation). This situation
is very common and is probably caused by a lack of firm and consistent rules in
the classroom, or by the teacher's failure to insist on them. As a result a number
of students are learning little or nothing from the lesson. The teacher should have
insisted on quiet and attention from the start, and stopped each murmur as it
began. Possibly she is afraid of losing popularity, as her reprimands lack 'attack'
and are quickly ignored; the result being that constantin attention and chat
become an acceptable and normal situation for the students.
To reverse the situation when it has got this far is extremely difficult. It may be
necessary to hold a serious discussion with the class at the beginning of the next
lesson, agree on new ground rules and insist on them strictly from then on.
Episode 3 (john bangs a ruler while teacher is explaining). Here, the incident
was caused by the teacher's over-lengthy explanation, the child's impatience,
and the failure of the teacher to notice and stop the disturbance when it started
(perhaps by going to John and quietly removing the ruler, promising to return it
later). Most people's intuitive reaction when the class has fallen silent would be
to reprimand John. However, a more effective response would probably be to use
the silence to instruct the class firmly to start work on the worksheet, promising
to deal with any further problems in response to raised hands. Once the class
is working, the teacher could talk to John, make it clear that his behaviour is
unacceptable, but that the incident is now over and he should be working. A
further word or two with him after the lesson may make it less likely that he will
repeat the behaviour.
Episode 4 (student is cheeky to teacher about a notebook with pages missing).
The immediate cause of this incident, given the confident and cheeky character
of members of the class, was the teacher's mistake in getting into a public
argument with one boy in the middle of an organizational routine involving
all the class. The argument then escalated rapidly into a full-class crisis. The
teacher should have finished distributing and collecting books and dealt with
the notebook problem later, privately. Now that the class is in uproar, the
priority should be to abandon the individual problem, and concentrate on
regaining order and finishing the book collection and distribution as quickly as
possible.
Further reading
Charles, C. M. (2010) Building Classroom Discipline (lOth edn), Boston: Pearson
Education.
(Practical and readable, written for trainee or practising teachers; a
summary of various models of classroom discipline and guidelines for
practical application)
Cohen, L., Manion, L and Morrison, K. (1996) A Guide to Teaching Practice,
London: Routledge.
(A valuable practical guide to all aspects of school teaching)
Maclennan, S. (1987) Integrating lesson planning and class management. ELT
[oumal, 41(3), 193-7.
(On altemat ng lively and quiet activities in the lesson process)