Looking at Teachers 25
2.4 Teacher talk
“There has been much sescarch on teacher talk in recent years. This interest reflects the
importance of such tlk jn language teaching. Asi isso important for language teachers,
and also because itis an area which readily lends itself to investigation by teachers, I shall
Spend e Hide time reviewing some ofthe published studies in the are. Issues whi hove
een investigated include the amount and type of teacher talk, speech modifications
rade by teachers, instructions and explanations, type and number of questions asked
and error correction.
Modifications to teacher speoch 7
‘One aspect of teacher talk which has been intensively studied is the specch modifications
ade by teachers. A number of studies have shown that native speakers (leachers and
hot-teachers alike) modify their speech to non-native speakers in a number of different
dwaye. Tt has been suggested that these modifications make the lenguage easier '@
Comprchend and that this, i (um, helps the lencner to acquire the target language (based
tthe preiiss that we cannot acquire what we do not understand). Other studies have
Tooked at the typee of questions teachers ask, the functions of teacher talk, the nature of
vations, and the types of corrective feedback (error correction) provided
teachers’ expl
by teachers.
‘and Long (1986) investigated the linguistic and conversational performance of
experienced and inexperienced teachers. The purpose of the research was to determine
Ghhother there were any differences in the"speech-characteristics-of experienced. apl
inexperienced teachers in their classroom interactions. !
“Phe hypothesis upon which te research was based was that the development of a
second language occurs when learners are exposed to language which is compsehensibie
to them and which contains grammatical features which are one level of complexity
1 beyond theie current second-language ability It has been suggested thet certain speech
vr sifieations made by native speakers in interactions with second-language learners can
ake language more comprehensible and thus facilitate the acquisition process
“The two questions addressed by Pica and Long are as follows
tn what ways do teachers modify their specelt when (alking to secont-language
learners in the classroom?
2, Tete ability to modify one’s language appropriately part of any teacher's competence,
for ust it be developed through experience over tine?
inute recorded samples of speech
informal native speaker/uon-native
ichers found that
For their first study, Pica and Long collected tem
from ten ESL. teachers, These were compared with
speaker recorded conversations made oulside the classroom. She rese
HSL classroom conversation differed from conversations out of the clas in a number of
sways, There was much less negotiation for mea
ign the classroom (this was measured26. Understanding Language Classrooms
by the nuinber of tines teachers adjusted their speech to, cheek that students had
ne then, aed. that they had correctly undersioed the lavpero Pica and
Proghty suggest that the smaller amount of negotiation is de fo" fact that teachers
ao eae ieplay qucsions, ie. questions Co wich they already Knew the soe th.
ser ehat che need to negotiate was therefore greatly reduced. (Of the questions teachers
are ain clase 9T per cent ere ones (0 which they already knew the answers whereas
nvally none ofthe questions asked out of cast were of this (PE)
Ha es audy, Piea end Long looked for differences between the (NBhee of
expetienesd and inexperienced teachers, While some differeness Woe found (experienced
CA nerece more Bent, and used a wider range of question forme), these Were ot
tavtculariy arkedTa genera, the smarts outweighed the ifferences.
Pica and Long concluded from their studies that:
sh fluence of the catcoon content is stong enough outwith fers of (seh
etnces Conseqoety, even those wih ite oF ne previos experience immediately
cee power when given the oppor. ane accept the clang of ease nd
se the Poe Se Spintec of compensa input in SLA, the two sails enone
ers comes araging for lenrers whose primary action crsonment he
tere are not vey enn eaiine, ere were found to provide ess enporny fr he
aeration a meaning than is necessary flere ace o tain comprchens Je input than
Motaral NSINNS conversations ouside the lastroom.
inc fr eae of afi not hard to appreciate: iti iflelt for Warmers
Sceeite if they have nothing to negate wth. Thee most olviows poten bargaining
aeration ankrsnt eer dnt she or ober stad net order todo