Introduction
In he ety ight centr, the Northumbrian monk ad schol nom
own he Nenrsle Bede oeed sown comely forthe aa
tod tps “tne” As tal for hin, he considers inte pal
"fer ate hirame from ease inj ir “perme
tone snpan Taken nua ete tenor metre ney
‘Sears the force of enpemontn ch ders rom ne eb ope,
“tbe oer, diet reglate" The web cao othe wi
‘ut etlot rece, ge accep") hovers Deten the ate and he pa
She and thereby aplastic logo the eagle
‘reso called betas ey do moderate, de, and regu? Shear
fave ended to abuts tis emphasis on temporal regulon tothe
aly mona routine of eling bles cals to praer snd ino lng
hve corded tof rom afar more ambos, and eet, store
{0 polical deg. Wel attuned fo he sakes of tne ax repo
[ntl Bede ier Became thea stor fo we ano domi (0)
{ating nto rae, here ataching ity in the om of
‘hrian pit, othe sacred x the point of don in me? TH
‘erodlon, wiih not nize true to Bede of ose, com
Sesto ele clendas an pli ie
Treen’ decade ther hasbeen mach ateton w the “pls of
sine," and thas nox come unethered fom he problemas elon of
‘cry wh the cred Indo a te ober fe ave sa
thi reaton a their concep! it alm always expe in the
orm of die beeen a eligous Middle Ages and a secular moder-
‘iy. The arguments center upon Nn conscoumes nd foe
{ekg thee nee escapees bodied a concep of neo
the morement of sahaon Hiary andthe nebo the Ls Jude
tment and therfore ad no enc of a meaning tor change,
‘al plc finer hereore an onymoron* Thee argument feb
“erive explanatory power from economic model of peiodieation by
Sting tranetion from ees selec wth ane
Seo earned coe prion mney tne an
Imerdal economy, ont Qpalyexprewed the Uannilon fom2 tntrdcton
feudalism to capitalism So commonplace ae thes eas hat—even
‘onthe Middle Ages well understood to be a consuucted cae
tony they hare taken on the selEeidenay sats of common see.
"Rprincpal goal of ts book so ask why fa hea fal challenges
to lelogeat and sageorcred histories do the monoliths medial”
‘elgious/euta sd wodern/secla/ expat (ot “developed” su
‘Sve and what purposes do they see? What does he realatg ebe
cof medial moders peridation hold i place, and what doe it
Friptootmure’ What pea enmpsone go unchallenged whens
Jruton and lavlesmesaeabeed “feudal” and aged wid Ue Mid
{GE Age? What cla parade flora when & Christin otis of
time such av Bede's declared spoil, oF prepoeal A sincere
yagemeat vith these ise equres tat the vison mnedleval/ mod.
ene pinto quesion together ith extegries sch at "ewdal™ and
seul” with which twas mutually constituted, and whieh it olden
pase
Trevi the holden, most celebrated ergues of rig historia
paradign oul reinforce her han dart his peodaton. ns
Finly moss criique of antivopolog in Ton nd Oth, for exarple,
Jonanne Fabian st out thi ei, ith which few would now dgre:
“arise te that Tome belongs to the political economy of relaons
between nidulans, sid ations, then the construction of
Shthropolopy' je ehough temporal conceps and devices ole
Stace there ine Pier hae’ Fabin nds mecessary, bowers
{o slate thatthe dy f wich pole ust begin by recognizing a
“uate sep tom medieval ta modern te conceptions” whieh
ruled fom the cached secltiaon of Tie Although hei
lere that there ae other vast consider this history, he describes
“tian asthe Sscted veer ve in sharp tes "Enlighten
Tene though marke break with an went edie, Chris (or
JudeoChrsta) ilon o€ Time. That break wos from 2 conception of
tine/opce in terms of histor of sation to one that vitnately
ented n the cealszaton of Time a natural ison" Thus even
{bough be iss that "Time belong othe polieal economy of ree
‘Sone"Febian posts» foundational guaive breakin the nature of
Time that ie apparent ona plies Rater than considering the nar
Fatve of "wetlrized tine” pola, a part af » proces hat, ke
Thibopology, at once constes and demote ts objects Pabian
‘Snide tangy "acloved” Like Bede he thereby grounds polit
{floret by aching i oa rlation withthe ered ache pola of
Uvson in tine The fut that his tachment oa elon with the
‘Site aes the form ofa cla to detachment does notalte this fend
‘mental simi
Iweducion
By efinon, a dvion nine purportedly ouside politic and based
con relation withthe red both defines aad regulates police One
‘Shrican anpum fthevgulative funtion of mich dion the reent
{tution of ex. ("common er) for the nomenelatre 4a
‘ange that dos Lieto diminish the effect of» gibaled Chsian
‘Glenda, nd infact preg ir onder onder a rare hat appear
‘och seer and vera. Asch, miniturze te proces sted
‘bp Temeko Masuzava in The Irene of Wr Ralns: Oy, How Bo
‘Pron nissan Ws Pred nthe Language of Prati. Mascaras
ork chanfes what nt nae in a cate for the Enlightenment
schicyed sectaration of Time” Ae Europe poduced i own nar
te of scart, she show siulaneout mapped reqion be
there in the world according to newly consolidated coneepuons of
“yl” and Ylgous heiage, Wd thi pater in mind want t
callateaion tothe sikingcorspondence beeen Fabia temporal
‘Bapping of European plies according oa sated secular” die,
Sd the geopoliteal mapping studied by Masson. In er tems "One
‘tthe most consequental ews of thu dncoune [of world religions]
{tha piace what are material practices and tome them to
‘xpress of something timeler and sprain wie omy,
‘Sepotcines them." This depobiczaon mat be studied, I sgges,
in tandem wih ts temporal coven the contiuton of "religous
propia gs” The ond acer he
lege univer under which on “European” polis can tana
sap "secla” and only “secular plies canbe legitimate meieal?
‘modem perodston. By perodsaton Iman not simply the drawing
‘tan arr ine rough time, bit complex proces of concepai
Ingeategoriey which ate posted a homogeneour and retronesey a
ned bythe designation of period die
“Te rounding af pia der upon pertain ithe main con
cern ofthis book The sired seulr de presppored by Fabian hat
Tong been 2 commonplace of European history: je in world poles
today aad in recent theoretical debate the extgorestprempposes
{fenerateWoence and contention. Like, he period concept of he
cual” Middle Age sujuicates conceptions of economic a yell at
poteal development, and ever more fequenty acter a fOr
demoxrany™
“The problem which has ben obvious for decades, tha nis such
asmeredmediea}(edal and secularanoder-apitalt (or democratic)
freee eclasonay force, and reeiesigument with hiss pa
tesa elturl econo and nssonal fos or entrance int at
‘sensi glbal poll modernity. Taking up rested conceran, med
‘als have demonstrated how divsons atch a medival/ moder ofMite Ages/Rensianc inpotehomogencts that not only mask the
‘nence of modern characteris nthe Mie Ages and “medic
{Sr characteris in madera, bt alo stor the hstois of elds
Then ss medicine and philorophy and eclade minority hisories such
‘thane of wren andthe realy or eligiouy oppeed"Subaltern
seuos scholar Dipesh Chakrabary, longue opponent he concep:
tual divsonsconsted by sich periodaton characterizes the prob
{em hvu questions thas hight the overlapping concerns of box
‘medienliss sed postcolonial cee "Can the designation of meting
‘rome goup a1 nono Pedr ever be anh bata gestae of the
fpoerful™ How do we tharcterze those "whose life paces con
‘amy challenge ourodern dtinetons between she secular an the
‘screl, betwen te fenal and dhe expat besween the noneson
td he raion"
"These questions adress politcal trggls and disparities coday—
patel thee pertaining fo religous lence—but Fag i his
[ook tat they cannot be eparated rom the process that have cons
ted the eno te Middle Ager ats categories No attempt o gap
ie nh tex plea ilemanae can alfrd to ignore the Fanci of
Teel modin periation axa replat principle and thereby
Ferain open fot dinmolton of readings sch as abla’ which
‘owl, Rotten! freaks a fully “achieved” and outside polis
end of prceing iat the nara of “seclaed tne” smulane
‘uly produced an “ether” me an a "Other" of anthropology, Fa
sev atgment ke many sda and important tiques of “modern”
{ence tenscrber ove of coloniain's most cherhed stories, The
oncepoa! boundaries connate by his intellect history “temper”
iment thcordea effora to deal with some ofthe mot intractable
‘elle challenges and indeed bear sete esponsibli for hatintrac
li, My concern In this book ie otto revise definitions ofthe
“pelea” a the “modern,” butt addres the oesons and reife
tons inte by the periozing operation tne and wo how wy
this ater toy. Atlet ro stories of perodizaon are pated
here! ome tha generates nd protects catural and pois categories
by gicuning them upon a dion between medial and oder; and
(he nt grounded Chinn pola order by atachng by ayo the
tone donn aed the bibl persion ofthe New Testament over the
Gud Texament (which isle to say Christan tory over Jewish hi
toy) toa dion neared tine The ater ofthese enerypeed and
Feded within the fone"
"Tis Sock sis wo engage the wp of pridzaion atthe level fis
ta import Getty is tpi natone, Dut do nt want oDack
on vanes que forts prosely eough the sippage
Invroducion 5
fom foc history to iver xtegoy, fom singular evento naratve
frum, tht he effects of perodzation are disimulated and thos
fntonched The ble break becveen + medieval ands modern (ot
‘Sear noder) period evermore intensely aes workhistoricl
Implication for chore sucha the sovereign sate and see pal
‘rita categoris with both ideological and erstoral staked
for exactly tis eston the "Middle Age” Hhe "mmodeaiy” before
Irs been vaulted om pean ator to global etary of te
“This pnblned Middle Ages operates in two confit ae On the
‘ne Mand, eray and piss htary—wheher of Europe Aa India
‘or Acai increasingly organized along a conventional medieval’
(Gari) modern divide According thi emai, the world moves
tnlon, in tempo wih once Exropean nary welten a the height of
Sadia tadem wih colonials, nanalsn operas, and orienta
ia. On the other band te "Middle Ages extol egy apple
fables any sme to any soit rat has not "yet" achicved modernity
tr wore as become retrograde In this mode, provides 2 empate
{eat Fabian ha apy tee heen of cooalnes."™
Town ast ha en oped a0 Batorigrapical tcc, ven 8
a gesture of inclusion, ths globalised Mid Ager mast be comiderd
inthe context of what Lis Lone and Did Lop have pected asthe
tendengy under the premue of contemporary neocolonaleapiatm,
“fo amune a homogeaintion of global clare tht rasa reduces
posible forte eresson of aeratsex"” By peowding 2 singular
own of departie ital “medial” pat anchor this homoge
Som of caltral forma Mote special, ths sngularized point of
Aleparte alates the global appicaon of marowlyeonceted defi
Sone of polite! forsr-suek as modern democracy. feudal (ot
rogue") Sey and "weclc” goverment —the ni of which have
‘sen formulated through the peiodaton ofthe medical and the
‘modern, I i importa to empbasee that this prtodization also
‘equre sngulrved Middle Ages arsoon ae begin to purale the
"Spedieal” tr any meaningl way we begin o undermine the cond
‘om of poss ofthe periodiing operason. The tpi of maple
tempories cannot beefy broached, Iagget und the process
tnd the flees of perindizason have been taken no account. Periods
on a adem then, does no refer toa mere backdesrpion Ut
“ride hoy ino segments, bat to fandamental pla teh
iguea nay to moderate, ide, and regulates rendering its
‘eves nan an imporant sense, we cant poze the pas.
Torti reson, the pertinent quction eprdng pion snot
“When was the dle Ages" bac "Whete ithe Now" question
raed by Chakrabarty 8 challenge to scholarship tat prempposes &6 nrodvetion
“certain figure ofthe now” int approach to curren plc em
CESS rpues chat te innficiendy examined hisoriy of funda
‘Gena eoncep-sach ss tlgion, secular, democracy and even
er crceeader fe ogc of ay ven across the world unrecognie
nto dominant stains of ctl theory. which pss an sspoken
Timi to how "the now” canbe though
"The nitory ofthese fundamental concept 8 alo the history of
nmahcl/motem penodaation,consderaion of which ls een
iy raheking of cl theory an tr sit Despite dhe obo 8
Pune "Mid Ages” ava conaructed category ant despite some recog
“hlon oft vsed poston In the histories of colonia and competing
ectnn the latonship between te storcal concepaiaon
‘Bite defining auibter andthe formation of ome our mot bse i>
‘Sacal aun! peel soumptions ar aotbeen studied, Tis book under
ee aE tady by focusing on two iene with long and complex
PRGA fend and seeurzaon. These wens, bet notorious in
thectaance to dein, anchor “the Mile Ages a8 period con
_aptana supply the orate tases of the “modern sovereign state ad
Siero The problem of thelr dfinion cannot be existed
‘Som he eontving pevformance ofthe periodizing operations that
‘ona them
Feudalism and Secularization
My arguments egrdng thet evo complex ideas pertsn ta singl he
MU Mey of odes ort ond advances hough rages
we easton ond lation if en began this book wih the
ao af eventing feudal and weelaraion a concep Mop-
ree can how and why hey became mich powerful enporalctego-
‘Bear prise find tthe ea of Teal” past for Europe
Crerged nea ates ve sovereign, and tha he sateen
tym the cnt ena dant wer suceeded pofomatoe
Sty more han did hove of along Ceres Coal ey
eeepc hr tm pronmansag a ean amet
eo20 Intovton
In tw which enacted instsonal and es diet cultural change To
the degre tat such change was comstated and excuted ara break
ith pant simuttmeouly defined hs ac of pridtaion insanaes
“rts iit, Duar Dad Wallace remas with ference tothe Refor-
tin the easonnmine eect of ich Sts "can neve be ak om
prehensive thelr gents sd heir agent choices would Have ws
Fete The extent to which we grat an extent wats co wh
petodaton by fat depends not ony upon ou wii to ead wih
Sminant hstorlograpby and ls organization of steps and to come
Dy the selection ad description of texts and evens cording (0
We uricues of moder” nels! ory, but as to cooperate
the alppage betwee intindonalized mits and histor essence In
ther nds require os rumospectvely 1 collapse the aiference
eowcen story and tory of ory and ths riche Bas of
thas nays parca sovereign ca pon “the non”
The most poten crtque of ts hitorcum parca mapping
‘of homopesived historia tine t = mechanism of epatemologeal
hans has come in revent decades from the arena of postcolonial
idiex For is reason, a rich comverauon has been developing
etreen medial ad postcolonial tudes, abd one am of hit book
(Sieg he nor of the relation beaween medival/modera period
‘aon Sod echniguesofelonaien (even as they contin ody) nto
‘harper focus” As medieval have rece argued, the geneous
3Phe tate Age and of clonal are numa entwined. The
onstruction of» Sedna period characterized by tational nse
{Som was ly invled wth the dencaton of onal subjects asi
‘ona and suporaooun and this proces bore concrete elects upon
(lonized peoples through the stems of ral that it generted and
guise. Tes ofa soperstios Mile Ages in ther wor id
tne precin the "spertns clonial subject pon which became
mapped ther dey emerged together, each simultancooaly aking
ou and wring ect ewe, de seals of land tems i
Sins wen hand i hand with the development ofthe concept of 2
“Teal” Middle Ages, an tis als payed ot In anise
‘echions regarding he eguaton and conuol of land forthe p>
fs of extracting welt, ewen are concrebed a fendal medial ps
‘Bre war no auch Ssupeseous feds! Mile Ages” dye colonia
[aman doles there eve woul have Deen sch without olmak
fom ce ery colonizers could not have mapped and administered
‘brcgn lands td bodies ae they di thout the simulaneous proce
‘tian suck aide Ages” This argument does no eee 18
sien capter here, ba hope the reader nds iintrwonen, bau explie
IGyand plc, throughout these pages
Part I
{ Feudalism
5Chapter Tree
The Sense of an Epoch
Serlarization, Sovereign Futures, andthe “Middle Ages”
“This chapter proposes wo excnate the srctrat and kino Link
teow meal modern peiodation an the increasingly conten
thus ten lent fneion oF religon” in poll fe today, andj
(gs thecal eeogeion of tht nk a ladon to sovereign)
ero to undersanding and aseng this aneion
Sp itscwn account the burgeoning ana religion and secularism
ln the poli arena funders upon es centers of religion’ and
the “seclas The inte of thse term at 1 dacs Jeng ia ay
Introduction, wok shape though a double proces by which Europe
Sinuineouy narrated ie on vecataration and mapped rgions ie
there Inthe world according to newly consolidated conceptions of
‘elgion” and selgous hetage, Bee i rome redctvey the
sei ua ie rae ie
ie very basis of pli, prog:
‘Sica Hiren comsiounese,correlvely, Europes “medical”
Dacand aula ie pally colonised nom Chrintans were defined
[Belg Sadc angola pen for marae and teri
al dazlopment! Gl Ane hae pat most lun "seals is 2
ae Chetan gave Half when ic ivented religion, when fe named,
Tother oroters aligns” For this van, there con be no neta.
‘ruion of selon rte secular” any more than tere at be of
the "edie othe "modern.™
‘Wile he “triomphali” Chvintan narrative of secularization
tsi bore is ft Tosing eed, crcl anal condnaes
‘cra with ta temporal legacy, as the growing popularity ofthe era
“postsecular” ates Thi tert, sogess ent de Ves inhi ino
deo tothe ecent vole Polit Thies Pai ans na Pos
‘Stator Wind hould be understood "ao van tempt at hstoril pe
‘lation bt merely aan indicator for—vel a problem This
problem which rfc the history I decibe above bt is lodges
ny im myad diferent experienced stasons not one that ea,78 Secularization
‘even should e deine sted. donot advance an argument for
1 posteecular” Dat seek resist "religion" but do ages that
the problem entrenched in these tens can be beter negotiated the
{elaionship between their plies! and histoval ements worked
(ut There has bee area deal of tenon tthe goal iy of
{his elatonship, bv almost nae wo the impart ae of tempor
‘component, metic moderspriodiation,
‘Storsgu has lg been keyword in dacourses on secuations
indeed canbe said hat the claim to separate ou he “reign and
the "secular" above all sbi for sovereign. Ith chapter Tsay
the historical and ruta spec of tis relation and is connection
io perodzaton through an anal of evel ety Cal Shi at
lan his Pac! Tel (192), ao stent through es
bps contemsprary Walt Benjani. Un conta to the previous Wo
hapters, which ese the tric unflding of perodsng nate
Sethi chapter concentrates pon the ehgoredeal underpin of
the relation of pevidlation asa theory af Hstory to pola ner
Sent
(7AS discuss more fly below, Sehmit phraces his nas of soe
gain terme of parton wich fori sfee oo he nara
bt Burope'sexeicason fom Beologcl consent, bat tothe tar
“ence of theolgia forms othe pli ofan otennhy"ecia ate,
“inwhieh theology thus tecome immanent Tae crucial apec of mod
fz soverelgny in this see exenial Indebtedness to preceding
‘heologiea poll forms, «point that wa aborted snd extended to
4 theory of history by Rat Leth nth 140s The second par of 8
‘haptr sie the fers reaction to tistheory prc been
Iupted a deancut medietal/modeen, scred we secslr die, THs
‘eacton~vhich insu upon a weul;” plea a bse Co
‘ious modernity in conan toa "religious" Middle Ages deed
‘meaningfa politcal o hori conscosaessdeinests the sakes
‘tmedieval/moderspesodaion. Ulimatly tw nstence upon ce
Ur modern" asa sel'conatieig sovereigm period expote the
“agree wo which cant sovereignty found theses pon prod
Periodvation and Decision
“No pola stem can suv even a geserain wth ony naked tech
niques of holding power Ta she polial belongs the dea, basse
{here isn poles without audhose apd Bé Satori without eon
ft" in dese sentences fait His Roman Caton and Pica
orm Schmit crtques the presuppersons ofthe "atonal technor
The Sem ofan Epoch 79
‘rac etn he wake of Mex Weber’ fans arulaton of “cn
“Zana work, and Inthe context ofthe naacent Wel Republic's
“nerwar sagen Schmit Found the rauonallrtona enor 0 ;
Bes ssbiege by hie ber democrate pan roid ult
reine Mace ores es |
Schmitt's Concept of sovereignty "ons in the eque of poieal [* t
‘der wbich coders tcl nesta inthe sence at reonsider val (5°
to be relieved of the contimtation nth, and implementation wk )S2F |
respetio, other" thiserigue, which toanextet shared tyBen- SH
Ft, holds promi for pte theorists today. dente Schmit ut
hate spon of destorhi.
aomniacrcinents se theory aon.
(aunties ometine ced" of eergeney") in 082.2 8g
{scene ater be wrote Pate! They, wo argue for implementing the
Snergeney powers secon of the Weimar Cansitwion, Arce $8, | {8
| whic, although was orginal mended to newralize hi, late
\pe hearth na for Hier’s ise wo power# But when ih the 1908
“Poth Schmit and Benjamin contested overs in the conte of
the naicent, struggling Weimar Repub, each mh distaste for bour
{eos iberaiam and panes compromise the mpestons of th
Sgument were not fly apparent Schmit rend Benjamin’ "Criqhe
tf Vioknce” wth raratin, and Benjamin read Pol Thal a 20
Sept dlguods ofthe temporal and "theoogal” swear af ner
‘gy andthe importance of thir aractare wo the contemporary cs
‘Fpotitea legitiney Th argument dil, ut Schmit and Beng
‘Bit bot aboted unspatngy pon the theoloieal peck Eta sree
ite: Bethape not sirprsngly then, attention to thelr work has
intend in dec propor othe exalaton of “religion” pli
“alibetoric ance the 198s sometimes wo recognize the danger bu aso
i expt potential of the elation between piel and religous
“orm The thar and legis of Sci and Benjamin hve beer
‘cal sarin pont, for example, t ls Reiaara Lupton impor
‘nt exuninaon of the “poste ebial potental” of rethinking on
‘erslu through the hstoriealreladon of ctzenship and religious
{elowip®
‘Sch theory hat resonated with politcal advocates on bot the
left and right econinves, as Benne Balfar notes, to “haunt the
efenss at well atthe cries of maional sate sovereign” and
‘Shits conection withthe Frankfurt School and with Leo Suse
emai oper of intense debate? Mot imports been Sci the
‘ry of the excepon and is ight ito the “sovereign paradox” The
Ie onder of sate, Seite, can never be fly sefencosed
‘here rab the pouty that 2 "sate of exept,” which he theo
ay an
Hpaeea eanaaa REYe
v4
{9 Seclricaton
hes by analogy wo de mice in theology, might exceed he expecta
tions of al joriieal nore. The encepon “can aba be ehareteed
asa cue of extreme pei x dange tothe etence af te mat, he
ke,” ut by denon it cannot actly be predefined er "wade to
‘conform to preformed law" Consiitoaal development tended
‘ovat honing eal order ito a pre mechanic em for wed sl
‘Greumstances are caleslable, ths eliminating in Schmit eyes he
state's capacity to recognize the exception, t coniront that which
Incaeaabie according ti as
onder protect its avionomy, Schmitt argue, 2 sate therefore
fequiresascneteigh, whose poston iit decide thr = nate a ese
ao bas acer ajulio suspend the exiing legal onder forte peer
‘ation ofthe sate Schmit make cea tht i eating wi at
songs. Paradoxically fs nate to be sovereign inthe sea being
Mx, Sttomad taineioe aee ee
A Jie ssnerelgn vob le and ou ese od
"Yo deesion lke cretion ex nil, smitancotsydesaes soa
bes the iit of ot lan Hagar ue toe evkep anee
SP" ay a unde pnet edeacn indpenaen ogee
{he msantstion Looked ornately the decision noses
fom athingnen”» The tondaon oft soreign nce eck
Ieeable. Qe goa of th chapter so show how mete ons
eioaton freuen ery sbataeo daneaosndson
‘eoreregn snd heey ina coy arcs oes
fra inte ple ofthe erin these, erie ences
Sergi dain
Schmit ove agumeat ip ast ancton of peri
‘aon: Recentatenton Pala! Ragas ced prmarvon he
Sructre of syeegny ht louie shove, fen athe exper os
‘sora rgument Be thi srctre,eptomled ty he fens se
inet, “Soni te who desidet on te ure, ped ote
‘cual moran hora chins “Al span concep of theo
{2m aya he ate ae sare cenoged conga tae
Snow abe he meas tothe exten of Euopeen sees
Son hii ois at amr lg co
cept thon forms Under in thaw, aaa dep
shame of cancun and nas he maton
Imetieal/modern periods forthe avet foundation of ony
‘ign. Schmit’ pont theres temp tong the meee
kis of the madera eonsintonal e's elem ae Joomed
{Seas te premise Ar ae ad ints met leo
{ jcradence beat
The Sense ofan Epoch BI
\Whowver tes he rouble of ening te public av errr of pte
azo Atte docsoma dda asking ec scr
ocean chat the independent act af jure perespon
‘Seve Ine osprey pnw, ater esos
nse a remy acne ney
‘ran owes ples pone wel avo Ths toa ere who
Stes the gout oat aie tou peo eontengeay arurudene,
‘Son Talahibt a e ame ne toe: Tne Pocslpence™ of oe
‘modern bg oF Ge ca vey textbook of lam nt ony gui
Ea de tom slr
‘Schnit wes the state to ecognie and ac upon i hesogel form,
‘ather than repress thi inerene sovereign srctre He would here
Tore have Gngreed with the purpoe, bt not wh the hora na
‘ston cm A hau 4 ae
‘Chisianiy gave elf when invented religion, when zamed a eer
‘or others regione” Ita mater of digi” of “loan
hgger” drama, y which he (Chrisan European) sate hides he pe
foftire ofa soca deton (or the “power of the ord" mu
{porn under dos science and ona unienal, pre ron.
"oreo Schmit nits pon tefl neato ofthe rt
andthe hora in hi sovereign form:
FEpetreieeas gt oly boone of ey Ricreal dacyncna in ich
‘Dey were wane lg i then the se whee fo
Ffenbe ofthc Sun race, te recogndon ice ascemay oe
Helo ogeaegaion a hee eee foe ecepaon ngage
“TS te matcet holgy. Oly yng seo Sao ean
‘SCaprecte de manner n uh ie phileopldet f he me Soe
"eggs tha his iternecion of the structural and te historian "se
“Gusto provides way of snderstanding the working of medical?
‘modern peroiston and he ima pones wo any retain of sve
‘ent frie ia periodiation tat prondes the meas fr dsmowing the
niyo tial forme "Secularization," in the sense of ek
‘th he red general nderstond to have ocurred inthe course
(ofthe stents tothe cghtecnth conus, This beak can be dese
‘ated a acieved only ifthe time ofthe "sere ana cear stoi]
feferent,wbich cannot be supplied by the centres considered as
‘Sonal A ceifed “Middle Ages" made oveve a exemplar tn prot of
‘he religious” othe presecuiar sate therefore neviablwhered in
i
:
‘Roca Gavan ens aS| Secularization
to act ata flor she modern, sel rational stat: Medleval/modern
Beriodintion hat vo succesfully sesined the “loaned dagger
fama of seuareation that fen called upon oa teers
ern his role, asl show tern th chapter through ares
ing of Antonio Neg work i ft undermines theresa aaempt to
‘es the hegemonic Mea of he modern nation sae
We in a sense of secularism with alii to Schmit’ i the
work of Wer Benji, wo had son deal wth the “ane” supe
‘on of all existing aw in is "risque ofVieene,” but ho dieredy
Rawelck
‘ner has oan o eerie this story ae gues forthe sub
‘ion of Adres Rr eonacomc yan ending Ea A
rte, oto ad existed tn the capaion ofthe Jew from Repesiary
thew the sign” (6), The choice of Aldortr’s pla charged
‘icadenclclt hus ences the problem of spereaion an the em
orl rope ofthe tc, een art bonds te pang ion
[tthe ire toa edie Rly cone, and wntemporsied pas
Rosleks metho of reading the Aesndse a slo
ateorb medieval an ery modern sate otis no te “plane os
"ei" he theories Prior wo moder. he aoe: “Tas ayalrendy
suaranted fry ofthe pat elloed the core and bounding othe
“The Sense ofan Epoch 98
sphere of action salable wo the tate... The wate remain rapped
‘aia termpoal structure that can be wdentood ax ate movement
(i) ecw Rosleck's anal of periodation sted tothe ise of
{elgions he Reformation opens both his es modem period andthe
post of plc Iniates te poms of breaking fom "edie:
{RI sta for evo related reason that are ow familar from many
fof a prio break ist i movement of regio renewal
ed with all the sg fe En of the Wal,” yt the Hod did
pen, bot was incre deferred, weakening te grip ofthe
LGharen over the fare. Second, the bloodbaths of religous war
“FROTple t Reigous Peace of Augturg (1585), which set ade the
Feuiement of religious unity and hut "concealed win ioe anew
Pipe tht of petites” panel rer advanced by the Peace
Er Werpaia (6-8, Poles ths Deg to break the cee gep of
prophesy, or which i sbated ronal foresight and panning
Tn oun potvar analy oftanaisons in world order, Sent had
alrendydneused the historic of sas ad xeon, prophecy and pale
fics and ke Lit, he refutes medieal/moderm penton upon
the bass of conceptions of ior. Insiing upon the powerful ease
hor leven! to Chen pole since he de of Pl, Sct
invokes the concept of hueon, the “eesuanet” (or “ws one,”
‘umes, tuned by Pil In he Second Letter to the Thessalonians,"
Stich had log teen interpreted athe Roman Empire’ fnction of
Saving ff the coming of the Anthvat I addres thin den andthe
mio eh argument at length in Caper bate saent plot
tev hat Sci reties the eehatologielatmporl paral that
Kowelleck abe othe Mid Ages He argues insted hatte coe
pot htconsigsled 3 Gne fl witha “wear” meanings of
sor
dor he nga hon nh Te bela tras eae ols back
‘cen ofthe worl provides the only riage beeen be don ofan ech:
[tga yrat fal man eens ements tl mons ke
$5. chescs at Pct taal pve ijone wae angus
‘ileilehtetedi rhe Brean lh ul beable comprend te
Sipoaiat eeaota emf ome bese subenkSgg
‘As iin ironic reponse to Schmit’ warning hatte nai sine
fsh betwee medical prophetic and histori genres would rel in
“datring generations" Roselleck nana wpon a binaraed ad lin94 Sceulazaton
ac srg that moe om tas action, prope po, ele
four tose
Tor Roseleck this tnear anon doce no eminate nth dhe
Ealghenment och ony shinmered a te cge tthe periods
hereorcpatin of ropheel aie bya rede fare ha not
ettundunetaly roped the ne of Chetan expectations Ts
iat harmeaes the epic of tuler to he Mile fgets
longer cones fui Chasen (28) isthe Pench Reason,
“surprising that over the horton expectations a he coup
‘eather opened he cpa oo
Medics have lng since tied of suchas of ad,
sure and homogeney dior ta hey ety eee
Feponse onan pra ta wold i sy ce Be bee te pols
{onthe proiem that engages Raceck nwo ais pretest and
‘tccesor on ts tpi snoatal epee deste degen enue
{empiri edenee Iti phwopha stogpe concerning ead
‘Sinewnesor the pow of hel noes
frguet swell arene foray, to on he areca of
SSrereign and ceaton ool
“Thi reton and a dino fm rpm coc in Roe
lekseonclason wich ret tte Alundcoy now hanging
in Napleon's broom Trough chase eparthtsetPre
Ele piano hele i ft 1850 rer
fr Diet onthe cuentas us thatthe temporal cat of
‘dey ean nl abd rerun an the gab
{nyse ctor wl Dido wel pro so the Retluon bat ems
“pot of depart (it) tnder” bad sured the advent of
Napoleon ot with commonplace premonition ce Revolt, bt
tre preety, with predleuon of a aterath andthe auroral
{eid ino wich Napoleon seldtep.Rejond tn, Deo cold oly
Say "Wiat aller hasan? Ne one nw Ql ie
‘arto! On ire ped hough he renoning wan
‘terre on lay ace shoe of depot a iso
Sls andthe erisqe of clightenedsbosan” Diderot thot
{Fam undetermined are mae is Yep “toda” Npolee,
nthe other and ering hoe ss parle to th great hee
se, pondered the Alaandeclcs in bis pate chambers,
Sometimes at east 0 "premodert" hoghs “The power ef adion
‘ive ong eg anal he
nan Empire shinered though he pps new Dogg
the 1780 Revolution” (19-20). pew foe
Sow end where we began with lr pondering his ov guraon
Tae Sense ofan Epoch 95
in he sene ofthe Alzenesellch’s conic, plo meep. Noh
ing yet creping has change How as his hipped? Roseteck has
‘Eluined the emergence of modern pols ty naraing the elit
fin freon and reigiowscxpecaons om te Teal of plead
fkcion (I), in tise arora wth Sea's histo aecount dha}
togeer dein and the de othe consol sate had "band
{he'mirce fom the wort" by wbih he refers not "priate rl
lon” butt eligi audoraon of polled leptémacy. Unt he
ineicenh cena, chit argued. the concepdon of God andthe
onceplon ofthe sovereign wee aged (Fgh in is opinion) vi
Si wamcendence of he world sod ofthe sate But une Sebo
osetiee hal slong bes mcrating a double brea istoricl beak
ha eis mode of ing the cans gaan break win
the concepanzton of ermporay el n hi account, the lina
Shon of eligion an religour expevatons yl ox onl ole, nt
tmenangll oil me, and at de ral metre they fe. His
‘xample Rober, ho looks intanaecteraing, open fue and
Scr tak of en leading to a epoch of feedom and tappnes”
Foie sod meaning tne une in his “ama” he
Tower agunent. Hower far ftom opin. Lake Lowi, he
sexs conepuont of hori tie mse o poteal cation, aod
{Sul ederim a of re
THe to wean gous tac Boome pressive an this Tob his Rare
tls actnliy, But he persion and ines ean ony igure such
‘ecaperton as balding, oro pita ten ofthe “Besiog” he
{oul srw-aostany In his anal of everegy, Schmit had
Taped fone onthe problem ofthe exon and his enacts
{Sti the pen be iy satay een
‘Draue by deBoiton i requires sovereign ection unfounded in
‘orm ands utence thay wader materia ot
“pital, plop of hor fer ong grounds fr questioning
‘eto of plc werelgny founded pon te quate exchsion
[ia span cla to ecu he ace of “eeu” word rd. By
ony Kole defn of pits 8 the ection of teeny
ftom politcal deen would seer lee the bass of dcon unex:
Morel But thisot theese, His ergo of pole dcion wi the
‘Emporafaon of ine ides hat fs cxpanatoy bas "moder
‘gt tcl nus thi, modernity becomes a sovereign peo, and
{spent ai of xen
Periodinaton and Resistance
In order to outine the proces by which mediem/modeen period
ton darts atempesto amp the promise athe “exception” and nea96 Seculetion
uli, o to think new poli forms and alternate temporal,
turn briy here to Antonio Neg s engagement withthe etal ad
historia elements of Shi’ theory. Negi grapes wth Schmit os
Ieatempus to theorize the poss af radial democrie “casi
tent power that never cloned down by or reupered ay "const
fed pores” He Wises, nother word, to develops understanding
fof «power that mupend lw without ning into Jee another foun
tion for law. For Neg the "paradigm of custtnent poner fiat ot
‘fore that bursts apart, beth, interspsnges any precning
‘quilriam and any possible continuity” Schmit’ ehinlang onthe
xcepion dus come very low toa material definition of consent
power Schnitts"niacle” ofthe exception sppronnates he force
Stconsituen power in tat incommensurate with constaonal
‘orm and jad nt, wich Neg ihe oes As Neg ober,
however, Schmit’ advocacy of “deeson” forthe sk of preseting the
sete old recmpiey cane te potent ofconsvet poe: om,
‘Stsanton ond Conf e end snd mae wd abe ae se
‘roagh the whole cm, shaping it and oerdetrmning ithe of a
‘present the masa cat shennan te ene
SEipscTilmaneee yo fond a the tan
ween coco acne pes de so at ues poe
sapere a str my pe ro Ne
‘om In fc, however the eninendal maui through whic cnet power
cine ely ome egsing Stk er
‘Thus, Nee argues, Schirs eson of he sneregn “econ” rec
[nc sn power severe es.
‘Schmit’ theory afsoverelgtyeeeany doe ode nthe oecesiy of
protecting the sate. Ase pts Piel Fly “The eens af
the ate undoubied pro of te sepertory ont the wy ofthe
Ino, Te desi resi rom anna dean comes
inthe tue sense absolute. The state sje the law inte excepton
on he hs oft ght of elf greserason, sone wuld sp" othe
Aegre dat Scie prediapones the wovereg decom tote ates
‘ofthe state we could ty that isnot "decison atl nis own ens
{nd this he mos potent equ of Schmie Sach decoy ae
than comings he sagen, ex isu of shee inseaaiiytat
equa decor The «ipo fath—wonld instead bes een,
Misa ue sprog eens norm
TheSente ofan Epoch $7
In orto eit eh recuperation bythe eae, and to think const
vent power at an vorecpersble, unprecedented revelation, Neg
Stomp o theorize x pare unt, x enktrougs tha ast bass ly
inl Thee can ofcourse be na event wth some spec of eet
Yon and ths recogniality, and Nee therefore argues ora negve
‘elaon, not wth ening istittional power, but in tme, He ts in
‘ther nord to perodiaton, nthe frm ofa religious secular break
(which he wil algo define a medieal/modern break), im order
round consent powers "Convent power has alvays + singular
Felaonsip to Ume Indeed, consent power son the one hand an
holt wl deter ov temporaiy. In other word, repre
tents an esentl momen in the sectlaration of ower a pes
Power becomes a immanent dimension of hisory, an acta temporal
horizon The break with the theological radon compete" Neg