Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part C Fourier Analysis. Partial Differential Equations (Pdes)
Part C Fourier Analysis. Partial Differential Equations (Pdes)
Part C Fourier Analysis. Partial Differential Equations (Pdes)
215
c11.qxd 8/12/11 9:11 PM Page 216
The essential property of the trigonometric system is its orthogonality. Other orthogonal
systems will follow later in connection with families of solutions of linear ODEs (Legendre
polynomials, Bessel functions, etc.).
The integrals needed for Fourier coefficients are those of calculus, but their dependence
on n will create a new situation, and the student will need some time and particular attention
to become familiar with them.
Problem 25 suggests that students look critically at the speed of convergence, which
will depend on the power of 1>n in the Fourier coefficients, which in turn depends on
continuity of f (x) to be developed.
The figures in Probs. 16–21 should help students to get familiar with “piecewise
given” functions, as they will occur in practical work on potential problems, heat flow,
and so on.
pc
(2 ⫹ 5p) sin 5x ⫹ Á d ⫺ sin 2x
1 1 1 1
20. (2 ⫹ p) sin x ⫹ (⫺2 ⫹ 3p) sin 3x ⫹
9 25 2
1 1
⫺ sin 4x ⫺ sin 6x ⫺ Á
4 6
22. CAS Experiment. Experimental approach to Fourier series. This should help the
student obtain a feel for the kind of series to expect in practice, and for the kind and
quality of convergence, depending on continuity properties of the sum of the series.
(a) The 2p-periodic function f (x) ⫽ x (⫺p ⬍ x ⬍ p) has discontinuities at ⫾p. The
instructor will notice the Gibbs phenomenon (see Sec. 11.7) at the points of discontinuity.
(b) f (x) ⫽ 1 ⫹ x> p if ⫺p ⬍ x ⬍ 0 and 1 ⫺ x> p if 0 ⬍ x ⬍ p, is continuous
throughout, and the accuracy is much better than in (a).
c11.qxd 8/12/11 9:11 PM Page 217
(c) f (x) ⫽ p2 ⫺ x 2 has about the same continuity as (b), and the approximation is good.
The coefficients in (a) involve 1>n, whereas those in (b) and (c) involve 1>n 2. This
is typical. See also CAS Experiment 25.
24. CAS Experiment. The student should recognize the importance of the interval in
connection with orthogonality, which is the basic concept in the derivation of the
Euler formulas.
For instance, for sin 3x sin 4x the integral equals sin a ⫺ 17 sin 7a, and the graph
suggests orthogonality for a ⫽ p, as expected.
0.5
–2 – 2 a
–0.5
–1
asin ⫹ Áb
8 px 1 px 1 3px
⫹ sin ⫹ sin
p 4 2 2 3 4
11. Even, L ⫽ 1, ⫺p42 (cos p x ⫺ 14 cos 2p x ⫹ 19 cos 3px ⫺ Á )
12. Even. The series is
⫹ 2 acos ⫹ Áb
2 4 px 1 1 3px 1 1 5px
⫺ cos px ⫹ cos ⫺ cos 2px ⫹ cos
3 p 2 4 9 2 16 25 2
a cos 6px ⫺ ⫹ Á b .
2 4 1 1 1
⫹ cos 2px ⫺ cos 4px ⫹
p p 1ⴢ3 3ⴢ5 5ⴢ7
4
15. Odd, L ⫽ p. ⫺p (sin x ⫺ 19 sin 3x ⫹ 25
1
sin 5x ⫹ Á )
16. Odd, L ⫽ 1, f (x) ⫽ ⫺x 2 if ⫺1 ⬍ x ⬍ 0, f (x) ⫽ x 2 if 0 ⬍ x ⬍ 1, series
an ⫽ 100V0 冮 ⴚ1>200
cos 100pt cos 100npt dt
1>200 1>200
⫽ 50V0 冮
ⴚ1>200
cos 100(n ⫹ 1)pt dt ⫹ 50V0 冮ⴚ1>200
cos 100(n ⫺ 1)pt dt ;
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 219
a cos 600pt ⫺ ⫹ Á b
2V0 1 1 1
⫹ cos 200pt ⫺ cos 400pt ⫹
p 1ⴢ3 3ⴢ5 5ⴢ7
20. Set x ⫽ ⫺1. Then f (⫺1) ⫽ 1 ⫺ 1>3 ⫽ 2>3 ⫽ p42 (1 ⫹ 14 ⫹ 19 ⫹ 16 1 1 Á
⫹ 25 ).
Hence, the results.
22. Note that the functions in Prob. 8 and Prob. 17 are related as follows.
The function in Prob. 8 is
⫺x ⫺1 ⬍ x and x ⬍ 0
f8 ⫽ e
x 0 ⬍ x and x ⬍ 1
asin
2 px 1 3pxpx 1 5px 1 3px
(b) ⫺ sin
sin ⫹
⫹ sin ⫺ sin
p 4 2 3 4 5 4 3 2
⫹ Áb
1 7px 1 9px 1 5px 1 11px
⫹ sin ⫹ sin ⫺ sin ⫹ sin
7 4 9 4 5 2 11 4
25. (a) 1>2 p ⫹ 2 cos (x) ⫺ 2>3 cos (3x) ⫹ 2>5 cos (5x) ⫹ Á
(b) 1>2 p ⫹ 2 sin (x) ⫹ 2 sin (2x) ⫹ 2>3 sin (3x) ⫹ 2>5 sin (5x) ⫹ 2>3 sin (6x) ⫹ Á
0
0 x
cos 11x ⫹ Á b
1 1 1 1
⫹ cos 7x ⫹ cos 9x ⫹ cos 10x ⫹
49 81 50 121
The student should be invited to find the two functions that the sum of the series
represents. This can be done by graphing sin x ⫺ 12 sin 2x ⫹ 13 sin 3x ⫹ ⫺ Á ⫽ x>2
and then (2> p)(sin x ⫺ 3ⴚ2 sin 3x ⫹ ⫺ Á ) ⫽ f2, where
⫺ 2 acos ⫹ Áb
L 4L px 1 3px 1 5px
28. (a) ⫹ cos ⫹ cos
2 p L 9 L 25 L
asin ⫹⫺ Áb
2L px 1 2px 1 3px 1 4px
(b) ⫺ sin ⫹ sin ⫺ sin
p L 2 L 3 L 4 L
30. Shift by p. This cosine series is obtained. The sine series needs to be multiplied by
⫺1. The result is that the coefficients of odd multiples of p remain the same, whereas
the coefficients of even multiples of p are multiplied by ⫺1.
p p p p p 3p
r (t) ⫽ cos t if ⫺ ⬍t⬍ and ⫺ cos t if ⬍t⬍ .
4 2 2 4 2 2
1 1 1 1
r (t) ⫽ ⫹ # cos 2t ⫺ # cos 4t ⫹ # cos 6t ⫺ ⫹ Á .
2 1 3 3 5 5 7
Substituting this into the above ODE and solving it gives the answer
1 1
y ⫽ C1 cos vt ⫹ C2 sin vt ⫹ ⫹ cos 2t
2v 2
1 # 3 (v2 ⫺ 4)
1
⫺ cos 4t ⫹ ⫺ Á .
3 # 5(v2 ⫺ 16)
1 1
10. y ⫽ C1 cos vt ⫹ C2 sin vt ⫹ ⫺ cos 2t
1 # 3 (v2 ⫺ 4)
2v 2
1 1
⫺ cos 4t ⫺ cos 6t ⫺ Á
3 # 5(v ⫺ 16)
2
5 # 7(v2 ⫺ 36)
asin t ⫺ sin 5t ⫺ ⫹ Á b
4 1 1
sin 3t ⫹
p 9 25
with the coefficients bn ⫽ 4>(n 2p) if n ⫽ 1, 5, 9, Á , and bn ⫽ ⫺4>(n 2p) if
n ⫽ 3, 7, 11, Á . Substitution of this series into the ODE gives
y ⫽ A1 cos t ⫹ B1 sin t ⫹ A3 cos 3t ⫹ B3 sin 3t ⫹ Á
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 222
with coefficients
An ⫽ ⫺ncbn>Dn, Bn ⫽ (1 ⫺ n 2)bn>Dn, Dn ⫽ (1 ⫺ n 2)2 ⫹ n 2c2.
The damping constant c appears in the cosine terms, causing a phase shift, which is
zero if c ⫽ 0. Also, c increases Dn, hence it decreases the amplitudes, which is
physically understandable.
18. The ODE in Probs. 17–19 is the same, except for the changing right sides, whose Fourier
series we use term-by-term, as in the text. The solution of the ODE is of the general form
ⴥ
I ⫽ A0 ⫹ a 1An cos nt ⫹ Bn sin nt)
n⫽1
n 2 ⫺ 10 10n
An ⫽ ⫺ an, Bn ⫽ an , Dn ⫽ (n 2 ⫺ 1022 ⫹ 100n 2,
Dn Dn
acos t ⫹ cos 5t ⫹ Á b.
800 1 1
100 ⫹ 100p ⫺ cos 3t ⫹
p 9 25
Hence A0 ⫽ 10 ⫹ 10p and all the other An and Bn with n even are zero. The formula
for the an is ⫺800>(pn 2) where n is odd. Numerically evaluating the terms, we obtain
the solution (the current in the RLC-circuit)
I ⫽ 41.416 ⫺ 12.662 cos t ⫺ 14.069 sin t ⫺ 0.031 cos 3t
⫺ 0.942 sin 3t ⫹ 0.056 cos 5t ⫺ 0.187 sin 5t ⫹ Á .
Further Comments
The ideas in this section play a basic role in more advanced applied and abstract courses.
CAS Experiment 10 will give the student a feel for the size of the error of the present
approximation and its size as a function of the number of terms considered, that is, for
the rapidity of its decrease.
For other types of interpolation and approximation and for numeric work, see Secs. 19.3,
19.4, and 20.5.
From this, the minimum square error is obtained as shown in Example 1 of the text; note
that the present function and that in Example 1 differ just by an additive constant p.
4. F ⫽ 2>3 p2 ⫹ 4 cos(x) ⫺ cos(2x) ⫹ 4>9 cos(3x) ⫺ 1>4 cos(4x)
4
⫹ 25 cos (5x) ⫺ 1>9 cos (6x) ⫹ Á
E* ⫽ 4.13, 0.99, 0.39, 0.17, 0.11
5. F ⫽ 4 sin(x) ⫹ 4>3 sin(3x) ⫹ 4>5 sin(5x) ⫹ Á , bn ⫽ n2 ((⫺1)1ⴙn ⫹ 1)
E* ⫽ 62.012, 60.739, 60.739, 60.420, 60.420
6. The function in Prob. 3 is continuous, the function in Prob. 5 is not; indeed, it is the
derivative of the function in Prob. 3, and differentiation produces a factor n in each term.
8. The approximating trigonometric polynomial of minimum square error is
x
– 0
Section 11.4. Problem 8
10. CAS Experiment. Factors are the continuity or discontinuity and the speed with
which the coefficients go to zero, 1>n, 1>n 2.
For f (x) given on ⫺p ⬍ x ⬍ p some data are as follows ( f, decrease of the
coefficients, continuity or not, smallest N such that E* ⬍ 0.1).
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 224
problems (Chap. 8), where existence is trivial, a consequence of the fact that a polynomial
equation f (x) ⫽ 0 ( f not constant) has at least one solution and at most n numerically
different ones (where n is the degree of the polynomial).
Move of This Theory from Chap. 5 to Chap. 11
Sturm–Liouville theory is motivated to a large extent by the use of orthogonality in
connection with Fourier series and by generalizations from y s ⫹ ly ⫽ 0 (in the separation
of the vibrating string PDE, the wave PDE) to more general linear ODEs (Legendre and
Bessel above all).
The Sturm–Liouville material is now close to one of its main applications in PDEs
(Chap. 12). More importantly, orthogonality seems more complicated to grasp than other
theories and needs digestion time and more maturity than the average student probably
has in Part A on ODEs. At least, this is my observation resulting from teaching these
matters many times to engineers, physicists, and mathematicians, representing groups of
various interests and maturity in applied mathematics.
pr
y s ⫹ p y r ⫹ a p ⫹ l p b y ⫽ 0.
q r
py s ⫹ p r y r ⫹ (q ⫹ lr)y ⫽ 0,
Hence f ⫽ p r >p, p ⫽ exp ( 兰 f dx), q>p ⫽ g, q ⫽ gp, r>p ⫽ h, r ⫺ hp. A reason for
performing this transformation may be the discovery of the weight function needed
for determining the orthogonality. We see that
冮
r (x) ⫽ h (x)p (x) ⫽ h (x) exp a f (x) dxb .
This problem shows that a Sturm–Liouville equation is rather general; more precisely,
it is equivalent to a general second-order homogeneous linear ODE whose coefficient
of the unknown function y (x) contains a parameter l, the coefficient being of the
form Q ⫹ lR.
7. lm ⫽ (mp>5)2, m ⫽ 1, 2, Á ; ym ⫽ sin (mpx>5)
8. l ⫽ (mp>L)2, m ⫽ 1, 2, Á ; ym ⫽ sin (mpx>L)
10. We need
y ⫽ A cos kx ⫹ B sin kx
y r ⫽ ⫺Ak sin kx ⫹ Bk cos kx.
From the boundary conditions we obtain
y (0) ⫽ A ⫽ y (1) ⫽ A cos k ⫹ B sin k
y r (0) ⫽ Bk ⫽ y r (1) ⫽ ⫺Ak sin k ⫹ Bk cos k.
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 226
Ordering gives
(1 ⫺ cos k)A ⫺ (sin k)B ⫽ 0
(k sin k) A ⫹ k (1 ⫺ cos k) B ⫽ 0.
By eliminating A and then requiring B ⫽ 0 (to have y ⫽ 0, an eigenfunction) or simply
by noting that for this homogeneous system to have a nontrivial solution A, B, the
determinant of its coefficients must be zero; that is,
12. A general solution y ⫽ e2x (A cos kx ⫹ B sin kx), k ⫽ 1l, of this ODE with constant
coefficients is obtained as usual. The Sturm–Liouville form of the ODE is obtained
by using the formulas in Prob. 6,
(eⴚ4xy r ) r ⫹ eⴚ4x (k 2 ⫹ 1)y ⫽ 0
From this and the boundary conditions we expect the eigenfunctions to be orthogonal
on 0 ⱕ x ⱕ 1 with respect to the weight function eⴚ4x. Now, from that general solution
and y (0) ⫽ A ⫽ 0, we see that we are left with y ⫽ e2x sin kx. From the second
boundary condition y (1) ⫽ 0 we now obtain
y (1) ⫽ e2 sin k ⫽ 0, k ⫽ mp, m ⫽ 1, 2, Á .
Hence the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are
lm ⫽ (mp)2, ym ⫽ e2x sin mpx.
冮ⴚ1
cos (m arc cos x) cos (n arc cos x)(1 ⫺ x 2)ⴚ1>2dx
p p
⫽ 冮0
cos mu cos nu du ⫽
1
2 冮0
(cos (m ⫹ n)u ⫹ cos (m ⫺ n)u) du,
冮
0
e
ⴚx k
x L n(x) dx ⫽
1
n! 冮0
x
kd
dx
n ⴚx
n (x e ) dx ⫽ ⫺
k
n! 冮
0
x
kⴚ1 d
dx
n ⴚx
nⴚ1 (x e ) dx
ⴥ
d nⴚk
⫽ Á ⫽ (⫺1)k
k
n! 冮
0
dx nⴚk
ⴚ
(x n e x) dx ⫽ 0.
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 227
12. f (x) ⫽ 0.6116P0 (x) ⫺ 0.7032P2 (x) ⫹ 0.0999P4 (x) ⫹ Á , m 0 ⫽ 4. Compare with
Prob. 13!
ⴥ
14. Team Project. (b) A Maclaurin series f (t) ⫽ a ant n has the coefficients an ⫽
f (n) (0)>n! We thus obtain n⫽0
d n txⴚt2>2 n
` x2>2 d
(eⴚ(xⴚt) >2) ` .
2
f (n) (0) ⫽ n
(e ) ⫽ e n
dt t⫽0 dt t⫽0
d n ⴚz 2>2 n
>2
` n x 2>2 d
(eⴚx >2) ⫽ Hen (x).
2 2
f (n) (0) ⫽ ex (⫺1)n n
(e ) ⫽ (⫺1) e n
dz z⫽x dx
(c) Gx ⫽ a a nr (x)t n ⫽ a He nr (x)t n>n! ⫽ tG ⫽ a Henⴚ1(x)t n>(n ⫺ 1)!, etc.
>2
(d) We write eⴚx
2
⫽ v, v(n) ⫽ d nv>dx n, etc., and use (21). By integrations by parts,
for n ⬎ m,
⬁ ⬁ ⬁
冮ⴚ⬁
vHem Hen dx ⫽ (⫺1)n 冮ⴚ⬁
Hemv(n) dx ⫽ (⫺1)nⴚ1 冮
ⴚ⬁
r v(nⴚ1) dx
Hem
⬁
⫽ (⫺1)nⴚ1m 冮ⴚ⬁
Hemⴚ1v(nⴚ1) dx ⫽ Á
⫽ (⫺1)nⴚmm! 冮
ⴚ⬁
He0v(nⴚm) dx ⫽ 0.
(e) nHen ⫽ nxHenⴚ1 ⫺ nHenr ⴚ1 from (22) with n ⫺ 1 instead of n. In this equation,
the first term on the right equals xHenr by (21). The last terms equals ⫺Hens, as follows
by differentiation of (21).
It is interesting that we shall now be able to prove and understand the Gibbs phenomenon
in terms of the sine integral and Dirichlet’s discontinuous factor in Example 2. See, in
particular, Fig. 283.
Fourier cosine and Fourier sine integral in (10) and (11) are analogs of Fourier cosine
and Fourier sine series.
Example 3 shows a basic application.
The evaluation of integrals by the present method is shown in Probs. 1–6 for the Fourier
integral itself and in Probs. 7–12 and 16–20 for Fourier cosine and sine integrals, respectively.
CAS Experiments 13 and 15 should help the student in gaining additional insight beyond
the present formalism.
Project 14 is a first step into transform theory similar to that of the Laplace transform
in Chap. 6, the latter being of much greater importance to the engineer.
1. f(x) ⫽ peⴚx(x ⬎ 0) gives A ⫽ 兰0⬁ eⴚx>2 cos wv dv ⫽ 2(1>4 1⫹ w2), B ⫽ (1>4 w ⫹ w2) ,
(see Example 3) etc.
2. Use (11) and f (x) ⫽ (p>2) sin x (0 ⬉ x ⬉ p) to get, with the help of (11) in App. 3.1,
p
B (w) ⫽ 冮 sin v sin wv dv ⫽ 1sin⫺pww .
0
2
1 ⫺ cos wp
兰0⬁ 4 sin wvdv ⫽
2 p
3. Use (11); B ⫽ p 2w
4. Use (10). Also use (11) in App. A3.1. Take f (x) ⫽ 12 p cos x. Then
p>2
cos 12 pw
A (w) ⫽
1
p 冮ⴚ p>2
p
2
cos v cos wv dv ⫽ 2
1 ⫺ w2
.
1
w cos w ⫺ sin w
2
5. B(w) ⫽ p 冮
0
⫺
px
2
sin wv dv ⫽
w2
6. Take f (x) ⫽ peⴚx cos x (x ⬎ 0). Then (11) in this section and (11) in App. A3.1
give
⬁
B (w) ⫽ p
2
冮 pe
0
ⴚv
cos v sin wv dv
⬁ ⬁
⫽ 冮e
0
ⴚv
sin (w ⫹ 1)v dv ⫹ 冮e
0
ⴚv
sin (w ⫺ 1)v dv.
p 冮
asin w ⫺ 2 sin w ⫹ cos wb, so that the answer is
2 2 2 2
8. A ⫽ v 2
cos wv dv ⫽
0 pw w w
⬁
p
2
冮0
c a1 ⫺
2
w2
b sin w ⫹ cos w d
2
w
cos xw
w
dw.
Although many students will do the actual integration by their CAS, problems of
the present type have the merit of illustrating the ideas of integral representations and
transforms, a rather deep and versatile creation, and the techniques involved, such as
the proper choice of integration variables and integration limits. Moreover, graphics
will help in understanding the transformation process and its properties, for instance,
with the help of Prob. 18 or similar experiments.
ⴥ
sin aw ⫺ aw cos aw
p 冮
4
10. cos xw dw
0
w3
a
1 ⫺ eⴚa (cos wa ⫺ w sin wa)
12. A ⫽
p
2
冮0
eⴚv cos wv dv ⫽
2
p
a
1 ⫹ w2
b, so that the integral
representation is
ⴥ
1 ⫺ eⴚa (cos wa ⫺ w sin wa)
p
2
冮0
1 ⫹ w2
cos xw dw.
冮 冮 A a a b cos xp a .
p dp
f (ax) ⫽ A (w) cos axw dw ⫽
0 0
B*(w) ⫽
2
p 冮0
vf (v) sin wv dv ⫽ ⫺
dA
dw
2
A ⫽ p wⴚ1 sin w.
2
As ⫽ p (2wⴚ3 sin w ⫺ 2 wⴚ2 cos w ⫺ w ⴚ1 sin w).
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 231
x f (x) ⫽
2
p
2
冮
0
c a⫺
2
w 3 ⫹
1
w
b sin w ⫹ 2 cos w d cos xw dw.
w
2
⫽⫺ a b.
dA 2 cos w sin w
B* (w) ⫽ ⫺ ⫺
dw p w w2
This agrees with the result obtained by using (11). Note well that here we are dealing
with a relation between the two Fourier transforms under consideration.
(d) The derivation of the following formulas is similar to that of (a1)–(a3).
⬁
(d1) f (bx) ⫽
1
b 冮 B a wb b sin xw dw
0
(b ⬎ 0)
⬁
d 2B
(d3) x f (x) ⫽
2
冮
0
D* (w) sin xw dw, D* (w) ⫽ ⫺
dw 2
.
B (w) ⫽
2
p 冮 v sin wv dv ⫽ p2w
0
2 (sin aw ⫺ aw cos aw)
⬁
cos w ⫺ 1
17. p
2
冮 w sin xw dw
0
p
2 w(1 ⫹ cos pw)
18. B (w) ⫽
p
2
冮0
cos v sin wv dv ⫽
p w2 ⫺ 1
gives the integral representation
⬁
w(1 ⫹ cos pw)
2
p 冮 0
w2 ⫺ 1
sin xw dw.
Note that the Fourier sine series of the odd periodic extension of f (x) of period 2p has
the Fourier coefficients bn ⫽ (2> p)n(1 ⫹ cos np)>(n 2 ⫺ 1). Compare this with B (w).
⬁
w ⫺ (w cos w ⫹ sin w)>e
20.
2
p 冮
0
1 ⫹ w2
sin xw dw
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 232
If you got your answer by a CAS (e.g., by Maple) in a somewhat unusual form, plot
it to see that it is correct.
12(1 ⫺ cos(2w))
3. fˆc (w) ⫽
1pw 2
4. This is standard integral of calculus. If you want to do it by your CAS, you may have
trouble for general a (⬎0); however, you should still be able to see what the limit is
and your CAS should be able to do evaluation for any fixed number a. For instance,
this is the situation for Maple.
12(sin(w) ⫺ cos(w)w)
5. fˆc (w) ⫽ 2
1pw 3
6. We have f s(x) ⫽ 2 ⫽ g(x) if 0 ⬍ x ⬍ 1, f s(x) ⫽ 0 if x ⬎ 1.
By integration,
2 sin w
gc (w) ⫽ 2 .
Bp w
Hence (5a) with f r (0) ⫽ 0 would give
2 sin w
⫺2 ,
B p w3
just one of the three terms shown in the answer to Prob. 5. This should show the
student the importance of the continuity assumptions in the present and similar cases.
8. The defining integral (1a) has no limit,
⬁
冮0
k cos wx dx ⫽ k lim
x :⬁
sin wx
w (w fixed!).
e ⴚa 12w
9.
1p(w 2 ⫹ 1)
10. Use f s(x) ⫽ a 2f (x) to obtain from (5b)
2
fs( f s(x)) ⫽ a 2 fs( f (x)) ⫽ ⫺w 2 fs ( f (x)) ⫹ w,
Bp
12 (w 2 ⫺ 2w sin(w) ⫺ 2 cos(w) ⫹ 2)
11.
1pw 3
12. fs(xeⴚx >2) ⫽ ⫺fs((eⴚx >2
) r ) ⫽ wfc(eⴚx >2
) ⫽ weⴚw >2
2 2 2 2
from formula 4 in Table I
(see Sec. 11.10 of text).
14. Formula 4 in Table II (see Sec. 11.10 of text) with a ⫽ 12 gives
⌫ a b sin w ⴚ1>2 ⌫ a b .
2 ⴚ1>2 1 p 1 1
fs(x ⴚ1>2) ⫽ w ⫽
Bp 2 4 1p 2
On the other hand, by formula 2 in Table II,
Comments on Content
The complex Fourier integral is relatively easily obtained from the real Fourier integral
in Sec. 11.7, and the definition of the Fourier transform is then immediate.
Note that convolution f * g differs from that in Chapter 6, and so does the formula (12)
in the convolution theorem (we now have a factor 12p).
Short Courses. This section can be omitted.
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 234
⫺i
⫽ 2i sin (1 ⫺ w)
12p (1 ⫺ w)
2 sin (w ⫺ 1)
⫽ .
Bp w ⫺ 1
4. By integration of the defining integral we obtain
0 0
1
12p
冮 ⴚ⬁
e(kⴚiw)x dx ⫽
1 # e(kⴚiw)x
12p k ⫺ iw ⴚ ⬁
`
1 # 1
⫽ .
12p k ⫺ iw
a b
1 1 1
⫽ ⫹
12p 1 ⫺ iw 1 ⫹ iw
1 2 2 1
⫽ ⫽ .
12p 1 ⫹ w 2 B p 1 ⫹ w2
0
e1⫹iw e⫺(1⫹iw)x
a⫺(⫺1) ` b
1
⫽ ⫹
12p ⫺(1 ⫹ iw) ⫺(1 ⫹ iw)(1 ⫹ iw) ⴚ1
⫺e1⫹iw 1 ⫺ e1⫹iw
a b
1
⫽ ⫺
12p 1 ⫹ iw (1 ⫹ iw)2
1
⫽ (1 ⫹ e1⫹iw(⫺1 ⫺ i(⫺w ⫹ i)))
12p(⫺w ⫹ i)2
1
⫽ (1 ⫹ iwe1⫹iw).
12p(⫺w ⫹ i)2
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 235
Problems 2 to 11 should help the student get a feel for integrating complex
exponential functions and for their transformation into cosine and sine, as needed in
this context. Here, it is taken for granted that complex exponential functions can be
handled in the same fashion as real ones, which will be justified in Part D on complex
analysis. The problems show that the technicalities are rather formidable for someone
who faces these exponential functions for the first time. This is so for relatively simple
f (x), and since a CAS will give all the results without difficulty, it would make little
sense to deal with more complicated f (x), which would involve increased technical
difficulties but no new ideas.
Furthermore, the present problem illustrates the following situation. Maple gave a
result quite different and much more complicated than that obtained by the usual
formal integration. In such a case, consider the difference between the result obtained
and that expected and try to see whether you can reduce this difference to zero, thereby
confirming what you had expected.
Problem 9 is of a similar type, that is, the difference between the result expected
and that obtained can be reduced to zero.
10. By integration by parts,
1 1
xeⴚiwx
1
1
12p
冮ⴚ1
xe ⴚiwxdx ⫽
1
a ` ⫺
12p ⫺iw ⴚ1 ⫺iw
1
冮 ⴚ1
eⴚiwx dx b
eⴚiw
1
eiw
a eⴚiwx ` b
1 1
⫽ ⫹ ⫺
12p ⫺iw ⫺iw (⫺iw)2 ⴚ1
a
1 2 cos w 1
⫽ ⫹ 2 (e ⴚiw ⫺ eiw )b
22p ⫺iw w
a b
2 i cos w i sin w
⫽ ⫺
Bp w w2
2 # i
⫽ (w cos w ⫺ sin w).
B p w2
4 i(sin(1>2w))2
11. w
12. Let f (x) ⫽ xe ⴚx (x ⬎ 0) and g(x) ⫽ e ⴚx (x ⬎ 0). Then f r ⫽ g ⫺ f and by (9)
iw f( f ) ⫽ f( f r ) ⫽ f( g) ⫺ f( f ).
From this and formula 5 in Table III (see Sec. 11.10 of text) with a ⫽ 1,
1
(1 ⫹ iw) f( f ) ⫽ f( g) ⫽ .
12p (1 ⫹ iw)
i eib(aⴚw) ⫺ eⴚib(aⴚw)
.
12p a⫺w
c11.qxd 7/12/11 2:15 PM Page 236
Multiply numerator and denominator by ⫺1, use sin (⫺a) ⫽ ⫺sin a and the formula
for the sine Prob. 1. This gives
i eib(aⴚw) ⫺ eⴚib(aⴚw) i 2i sin b(a ⫺ w) 2 sin b(w ⫺ a)
⫽ ⫽ .
12p w⫺a 12p w⫺a Bp w⫺a
16. Team Project. (a) Use t ⫽ x ⫺ a as a new variable of integration.
(b) Use c ⫽ 3b. Then (a) gives
eibw ⫺ e⫺ibw 2i sin bw 2 # sin bw
e2ibw f( f (x)) ⫽ ⫽ ⫽ .
iw12p iw12p Bp w
(c) Replace w with w ⫺ a. This gives a new factor eiax.
(d) We see that fˆ(w) in formula 7 is obtained from fˆ(w) in formula 1 by replacing
w with w ⫺ a. Hence by (c), f (x) in formula 1 times eiax should given f (x) in formula
7, which is true. Similarly for formulas 2 and 8.
1 1 1 1 14i 0
1 1 i ⫺1 ⫺i ⫺4 ⫹ 8i 1
20. E U E U⫽E U
4 1 ⫺1 1 ⫺1 ⫺6 4
1 ⫺i ⫺1 i ⫺4 ⫺ 8i 9
c1 dc d c d
1 1
2 2 f1 ⫹ f2 f1
22. ⫽
1
2 ⫺2 f1 ⫺ f2 f2
1⫺i ⫺1 ⫺ i ⫺1 ⫹ i 1⫹i
1 ⫺i ⫺1 i .
12 12 12 12
This is the second row of F. The third row is
1 ⫺i ⫺1 i 1 ⫺i ⫺1 i,
and so on.
a
p 4 cos t 1 cos 3t
22. y ⫽ C1 cos vt ⫹ C2 sin vt ⫹ ⫺ ⫹ ⴢ 2
2v 2
p p ⫺1 9 p ⫺9
2
⫹Áb
1 cos 5t
⫹ ⴢ
25 p2 ⫺ 25
24. By a factor k 2, as can be seen directly from the formula in Sec. 11.4.
12 1p(⫺w ⫹ sin(w))
26.
w2
28. k[(ibw ⫹ 1)e ⴚibw ⫺ (iaw ⫹ 1)e ⴚiaw]>(w 2 12p)
12
30.
1p(2iw ⫹ 1)