Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta - SRD Law Notes
Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta - SRD Law Notes
Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta - SRD Law Notes
Home About Us Disclaimer Youtube Channel Recommended Books Text + Audio Notes Useful Data To search type and hit enter...
The expression 'Ratio Decidendi' literally means " rule of law or Ruling or knowing the law". When the Administration of justice
highest Court(Apex Court) of judicature in a country formulate/ makes a rule, while deciding a case basing on that rule,
Banking Law
that case is accepted as a valid Precedent. The apex court furnishes the various reasons on which the decision was given
in that particular case. Such rule or ruling is called 'ratio decidendi'. Civil Procedure Code
Company Law
Comparative Law
Constitutional Law
Cyber Law
Family Law
Hindu Law
Human Rights
Insurance Law
International Law
Jurisprudence
In other words, ratio decidendi is a principal of law made by the judge to decide the problem. Obiter dicta are
Labour Law
observations made by the Judge, which are not essential for reaching
the decision. when a decision is said to have
binding force in subsequent cases, it does not mean to say that the whole decision is binding. Those statements, in Law of Arbitration and Conciliation
previous decision, which constitute the ratio decidendi are binding. While obiter dicta has no binding force.
Law of Conflict
'Ratio
Decidendi' means "the reason of the decisions", which not only binds parties but also forms as law Law of Contracts
to the future generations. The Other meanings are 'the rule of law which others regard as being of binding authority.
Obiter dicta, on the other hand means 'dictums' given by the
way, and binding only on the parties, and do not amount Law of Crime
to law and hence not binding on future generations. However, there are exceptions to this rule that even 'obiter dicta' of
Law of Evidence
the Supreme Court are having binding force as law.
Law of Tort
For the purpose of application of 'Ratio decidendi', the facts of two cases previous and present, must be
Legal History
identical, material and relevant. Otherwise, ratio decidendi is not applicable in the subsequent case. It is called
distinguishing the case. Muslim Law
Professional Ethics
Property Law
Next Previous
Public Interest Litigation
Kinds of Precedent Doctrine of 'Precedent' in India
Transfer of property
RELATED
Restitution (Section 144 of civil Doctrine of Eclipse
procedure code) Doctrine Of Eclipse Meaning -
The
Section 144 of the Civil Procedure Doctrine of Eclipse is based on the Principle
Code,1908 deals with the provision of that a law w...Read more
restitution. Secti...Read more
https://www.srdlawnotes.com/2016/11/difference-between-ratio-decidendi-and.html 1/3
7/10/22, 11:31 PM Difference between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta - SRD Law Notes
2
COMMENTS:
To insert emoticon you must added at least one space before the code.
Ad mdlaw.eu
See Also..
https://www.srdlawnotes.com/2016/11/difference-between-ratio-decidendi-and.html 2/3
7/10/22, 11:31 PM Difference between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta - SRD Law Notes
Replay
Copyright © 2022
SRD Law Notes All Right Reserved | Content on this website is purely academic in nature. Readers need to recheck the validity and accuracy of the content from
their own independent sources before using any information on the website in what so ever manner. The website is not responsible for omissions or information that might have
changed but not updated.
Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy
Posts RSS • Comments RSS
https://www.srdlawnotes.com/2016/11/difference-between-ratio-decidendi-and.html 3/3