Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Informe de Ingles de Aditoria Financiera - Es.en
Informe de Ingles de Aditoria Financiera - Es.en
com
FACULTY OF BUSINESS
ACCOUNTING SCHOOL
ACADEMIC REPORT
COURSE:
FINANCIAL AUDITING
AUTHOR:
TEACHER:
Headquarters - Peru
(2023)
1
INDEX
INTRODUCTION
2
I. INTRODUCTION
In auditing, professional skepticism is a key pillar to ensure the integrity
and reliability of financial information. As professionals in charge of
examining and evaluating the financial statements of a company,
auditors must have a critical and analytical approach to their work,
questioning the Statements made by management and those charged
with governance.
Professional audit skepticism involves maintaining a questioning and
objective mindset in which auditors do not accept claims that are not
carefully evaluated and supported by substantial verifiable evidence. The
purpose of this skepticism is to reduce the risk of accounting errors or
fraud and to protect the interests of users of financial information, such
as investors, lenders, and other interested parties.
In this research paper, we will focus on exploring and analyzing the
central role of professional skepticism in the field of auditing. We will
examine how auditors use this critical methodology in their work, the
tools and techniques used to question and evaluate financial information,
and the challenges they face in maintaining skepticism in a complex and
changing environment.
Through this investigation, we will examine real cases of financial
misconduct and corporate scandals where a lack of professional
skepticism led to disastrous consequences. We review the lessons
learned from these cases and emphasize the importance of evidence-
based skepticism and a risk-based approach. In addition, we review
professional standards and regulations related to audit skepticism, such
as standards issued by regulatory authorities and guidance from
professional organizations. We will examine how these guidelines
encourage skepticism and will identify the responsibilities and obligations
3
of auditors to perform a rigorous and objective evaluation of financial
statements. The purpose of this research paper is to highlight the
importance and impact of professional skepticism in auditing and to
stimulate reflection on how auditors can improve their ability to question
and evaluate financial information effectively. In doing so, we seek to
promote transparency, trust and integrity in the field of auditing and thus
contribute to the protection of investors' interests and the proper
functioning of financial markets.
II. DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT:
Professional skepticism is behavior that includes the ability to critically assess
the adequacy and sufficiency of audit evidence, which includes information that
supports and confirms statements made by management, as well as
information that contradicts them. In addition, it includes the ability to identify
and respond to instructions about material irregularity, draw the appropriate
conclusions from the data collected, and always carry professional
responsibility.
Professional Skepticism is defined in ISA 200 as an "attitude that implies
a questioning mindset, careful attention to circumstances that may
indicate possible misstatement due to error or fraud, and a critical
assessment of audit evidence" ( IFAC, 2015).
Professional skepticism also includes a critical evaluation of audit
evidence. This includes information that supports and supports the
administrative claim and information that contradicts them. This means
questioning and considering the sufficiency of the audit evidence
obtained in relation to the situation.
Due to the foregoing, this concept becomes crucially important for the
proper development of an audit and its final result, and as the accountant
Samuel Alberto Mantilla indicates in one of his writings, "when auditors
do not properly apply Professional Skepticism, they cannot obtain
4
sufficient and appropriate evidence to support their opinions or they
cannot identify or address situations in which the financial statements are
materially misstatements” (Mantilla S., 2017).
IMPORTANCE:
Given the characteristics of fraud, including the fact that fraud can
include complex and carefully organized schemes to conceal or lead to
collusion, professional audit skepticism is especially important when
considering the risk of fraud material misstatement.
ISA 240 focuses on professional skepticism. Among other words, ISA
240 includes requirements to add something serious and incorrect for
fraud. It is genuine or the condition of the document has been changed,
but this fact has not been disclosed to the auditors.
Defining global responses to responding to the valuable risks of infidelity
from fraud material, as a rule, includes consideration of how the audit
implementation as a whole may reflect professional skepticism,
emphasized.
For example, ISA 240 includes specific examples of how auditing can
reflect more professional skepticism, such as:
Greater sensitivity in selecting the nature and extent of entity
documentation to be examined in support of material transactions.
5
Greater recognition of the need to corroborate management's
explanations or representations on material issues.
STRATEGIES TO STRENGTHEN PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM:
6
III. BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
Professional Skepticism: towards a Complete Definition. (2017,
June 29).https://www.auditool.org/blog/auditoria-externa/el-
escepticismo-profesional-hacia-una-definicion-completa
characteristics.https://cipauditoresltda.blogspot.com/2014/10/el-
escepticismo-profesional-y-sus.html
7
Yudelka. (2021). Professional Skepticism.
www.bdo.com.do.https://www.bdo.com.do/es-do/publicaciones/articulos
/el-escepticismo-profesional
articulos/CC/21%20(2020)/151563103017/