: YEAR/ :

NAME OF STUDENT ____________________________________ SECTION _________

COURSE/SUBJECT : ____________________________________ DATE : _________

INSTRUCTIO : Evaluate the student’s case analysis based on the criteria and their indicators as reflected in the rubric. Write the numerical scale
NS that corresponds to student’s proficiency and compute for the final grade.
For the final grade computation, add the total score divided by the number of criteria.

CASE STUDY EVALUATION RUBRIC

CRITERIA
Identify/define the main problem
and/or main issue
Determining the relevant
information to address the
problem/issue
Identify contributing factors &
connecting relevant information
required to solve the issues in the
case
Generate hypotheses & construct
sound and coherent arguments
related to the solving of the case
problem(s)
Testing hypotheses & making
counter-arguments
Evaluating the results &
recommended course(s) of action
(COA)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT SATISFACTORY
1 2
 Failed to identify the root problem, and  Identified contributing factors but did
did not indicate any causal factors not recognize the root cause
 Did not identify relevant information that  Identified some of the relevant
would assist in resolving the issue information that would assist in
resolving the issue
 Failed to identify the contributing factors  Identified some of the contributing
that impact on the root problem factors that impact on the problem but
didn’t clearly connect the information
 Failed to develop discrete, alternative  Developed alternative course(s) of
courses of action solid arguments to action (COAs), but they fail to respond
support their statements fully to the root issue(s)/problem(s)
 Failed to develop a viable argument or  Developed an argument that supported
compare alternative COAs one or more COAs but didn’t make a
compelling argument
 Did not evaluate the results nor make any  Offered an evaluation of the results but
viable counter-arguments didn’t choose a viable COA that would
resolve the problem
VERY SATISFACTORY TOTA
3 L
 Clearly identified the root problem, and
provided clear insight into the causal
factors
 Clearly & completely determined the
relevant information needed to address
the problem
 Clearly and accurately identified the
contributing factors & provided a
connection information relevant to
solving the case problem
 Developed at least three discrete, viable
COAs, and build solid arguments to
support their statements
 Developed a clear, concise, argument
and fully compared the alternative
COAs
 Fully evaluated the results and made a
cogent argument for the selected COA
TOTAL

EQUIVALENT GRADE:

3 100% 2 85% 1 70%

2.5 95% 1.5 75%

ANNEX E