Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BS 8007
BS 8007
BS 8007
BS 8007 : 1987
UDC 624.953 : 621.642.3.031 :
691.32 : 614.8
%
@ British Standards Institution.No part of this publication may be photocopied M otherwise reproducedwithout the prior permission in writing of BSI
Calcul des constructions en béton destinées à retenir des liquides aqueux - Code de bonne pratique
6
P >
British Standards Institution
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards
-- || | | || || || ||| | || |||| || | |||| | |
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
B S I BS*800787 m
BS 8007 : 1987
Foreword
This British Standard has been prepared under the direction This code, which is a type 1* design code, has been
of the Civil Engineering and Building Structures Standards prepared by a Technical Committee consisting of chartered
Committee. It replaces BS 5337, which is withdrawn, engineers nominated by the organizations represented
Following the withdrawalof CP 114 the alternative method (see the back cover). The members of the Drafting Panel,
of design allowed in BS 5337 has been omitted in this convened by the Institution ofStructural Engineers, were
British Standard. Secondly, the withdrawalof CP 110 and as follows.
its replacement by BS 8110 have led t o the updating of this Mr R D Anchor B Sc, C Eng, F I Struct E, F I C E Chairman
code to align with BS 81 10. One important changeis that Mr A H Allen M A (Cantab), B Sc, C Eng, F I Struct E,
the crack width equations have been modified to align with FlCE
the recommendations of BS 81 10 and now include a crack Professor B P Hughes B Sc(Eng1, D Sc, Ph D, C Eng,
width equation for direct tension. Other changes include a F I Struct E, M I C E
more logical arrangement of objectives and general
Mr D W Quinion B Sc(Eng), C Eng, F I Struct E, F I C E
recommendations for design, the introduction of a
restraint factor, the introduction of recommendations for Mr E H Thorpe C Eng, M I Struct E
partially prestressed concrete structures, improved Mr R J W Milne B Sc Secretary
recommendations for joints, updating of guidance on
The work of the Drafting Panel was overseen by the
jointing materials, an elaboration of the recommendations
Steering Group from the Technical Committee,whose
for concrete and reinforcement (including special
members included the following.
reinforcement), and a revision of the inspection and testing
recommendations for the structure. Mr C J Evans M A(Cantab1, F Eng, F I Struct E, F I C E,
FIWES Chairman
For the first time in a British Standard civil engineering
Mr H B Gould C Eng, F I Struct E, F I C E
design code the designer is recommended to consider
operational safety and to provide appropriatelya t the Mr I T Millar B Sc, C Eng, M I C E
design stage. Mr E M O'Leary B E, C Eng, F I Struct E, F I C E, M I H T
It has been assumed in the drafting of this code that the MrKRoweCEng,MICE,FBIM,MIWES
design of liquid-retaining reinforcedand prestressed NOTE. The numbers in square brackets used throughout the text
concrete structuresis entrusted to chartered civil or of this standard relate to the bibliographic references given in
appendix D.
structural engineers experiencedin the use of reinforced or
---
prestressed concrete, and that site construction is carried Compliance with a British Standard does not ofitself
|
out under the directionof a competent person. confer immunity from legal obligations.
|
|||| |
|||| || |
| ||
|| || || |||
|
|
||
--
* Type 1 codes are defined:in PD 6501 : Part 1 as 'those detailing professional knowledge or practices'
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
I" BSI BS*KB007 A ? W 1d24bb7
0021749 O m
BS 8007 : 1987
Contents
Page Page
*
4.3 Cylindrical prestressed concrete structures 9 contraction and restrained shrinkage 12
4.4 Other prestressed concrete structures 9 A.l Factors for the calculation of minimum
reinforcement for crack distribution and
Section five. Design, detailing and workmanship crack spacing 19
of joints A.2 Typical values of T l for OPC concretes,
5.1
General 10 where more particular information is not
. ' 5.2Types ofjoint 10 available 21
5.3 Movement joints 10 A.3 Influence of slab proportions onthe
5.4 Construction joints 11 centreline restraint factor 24
5.5 Temporary open sections 12
5.6 Joints in ground slabs . 12 Figures
5.7 Joints in walls 13 5.1 Examples of movement joints 14
5.8 Joints in roofs 13 A.l Surface zones: walls and suspended slabs 20
A.2 Surface zones: ground slabs ?O
Section six. Concrete: specification and materials A.3 Restraint factor R for various wall and
6.1
General 15 floor slab placing sequences 23
6.2Materials 15
6.3 Mix proportions 15
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
1
BSI BS*KB007 8 7 m 11624bb9 00211750 7 m
BS 8007 : 1987
Code of practice. Section one
1.1 Scope
This British Standard provides recommendations for the Recommendations are givenfor structures in aggressive
design and construction of normal reinforcedand soils and for structures in areas liable to settlement and
prestressed concrete structures used for the containment subsidence. No recommendations have been made for the
or exclusion of aqueous liquids. The term 'liquid' in this effect of any dynamic forces norfor the effect of ice
code includes any contained or excluded aqueous liquids formation on the structure, and the designer should refer
but excludes aggressive liquids. The code does not cover t o specialist literature for information.
dams, pipes, pipelines, lined structures, or the damp-
proofing of basements. The term 'structure' is used herein
for the vessel that contains or excludes theliquid, and 1.3 Symbols
includes tanks, reservoirs, and othervessels.
NOTE 1. The design of structures of special f o r m or in unusual
circumstances is a matter for the judgementof the designer.
For the purposes of this British Standard the symbols given
in BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985 apply.
NOTE 2. The titles of the publications referred t o in this standard
are listed on the inside back cover.
--
* Reference should be made tothe Reservoirs A c t 1975 for structures that have a capacity of more than 25 O00 m3.
|| | | || || || ||| | || |||| || | |||| | | | ---
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
2 Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
. .i'
L
BSI BS*8007 87 m L624667 0021751-7 m
BS 8007 : 1987
Section two
2.1 Design objectives surface crack widths for the exposure conditions defined
in 2.7.3 should be taken to be the following.
The purpose of design is the achievement of acceptable (a) Reinforced concrete. The maximum design surface
probabilities that the structure being designedwill not crack widths for direct tension and flexure or restrained
become unfit in any way for the use for which it is temperature and moisture effectsare:
intended. This code provides for a method of design based (1) severe or very severe exposure: 0.2 mm;
on limit state philosophy that is generally in accordance (2) critical aesthetic appearance: 0.1 mm.
with the methods employed in BS 81 IO. Structural (b) Prestressed concrete. Except for the special
elements that are not part ofthe liquid-retainingstructure recommendations for the design of cylindrical
should be designed in accordance with BS 81 IO. prestressed structures (see 4.3),the tensile stress in the
concrete should be limited for prestressed concrete
structures in accordance with the recommendations
2.2 Structural design of 2.2.3.4.2 of BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985.
A statically determinate member nominally subjected
--
The design of the whole structure and all individual minimum eccentricity of prestressing of 20 mm or
|
|| || || |||
members should be in accordance with the recommend- 0.05 times the overall thicknessin the plane of bending,
ations given in BS 81 10 as modified by the recommend- whichever is less. For statically indeterminate structures,
including cyliridrical prestressed structures, this
| ||
of safety and serviceability. The required exposure conditions for the surfaces of all
|||| |
It is recommended that the size of the elements and the members should be clearly defined a t the outset of the
amounts of reinforcement are assessed on the basis of the design process and each member designed in accordance
|
* In exceptional Circumstances where it is envisaged that theheight of fhe liquid can greatly exceed the height of the wall, factors derived
from-2.2.2 of BS 81 10 : Part 2 :1985 should be considered,Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards
j
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
I
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
3 -
B S I BSmA007 87 m
BS 8007 : 1987
Section two
--
||
|
|
|| || || |||
| ||
|||| || |
for both the full and empty conditions, and the assumptions Ground movement leadingto displacement and cracking
---
regarding the arrangementof loading shouldbe such as to of liquid-retaining structuresmay cause severe leakage.
cause the most critical effects. Particular attention should The designer should therefore consider the possibilityof
be paid to possible sliding and overturning. geological faults, mining and other conditions giving rise
Liquid loads should allow for the actual densityof the t o foundation conditions where the bearing strata have
contained liquid and possible transient conditions,e.g. varying degrees of compressibility. When it is not possible
suspended or depositedsilt or grit where appropriate. to avoid sites where such conditions occur, the designer
For ultimate limit state conditions, liquid levels should be should consider adopting one or moreof the following
taken to the tops of walls assuming that the liquid outlets measures:
are blocked. For serviceability limit state conditions the (a) dividing the whole structureinto smaller compart-
liquid level should be taken to the working top liquid level ments in order to reduce the likely differential
or the overflow level as appropriate to working conditions. movement in each compartment;
Allowance should be made for the effects of any adverse (b) providing specially designed joints in the structure
soil pressures on walls, according to the compaction and/or to facilitate movement;
surcharge of the soil and thecondition of the structure (c) using prestressing techniquesto act as a safeguard
during construction and in service. No relief should be against cracking;
given for beneficial soil pressure effects on the wallsof
(dl providing flexible sections in service pipes;
containment structuresin the full condition. Thermal
expansion of a roof should be minimized by reflective (e) in mining areas, providing a form offoundation that
gravel or other protection against solar radiation. An will reduce any horizontal forces from ground
example of a critical adverse loading effect occurs when movement;
thermal expansion of a roof forces the wallsof an empty (f) providing underfloor drainage to prevent possible
structure into the surrounding backfill. In this case the uplift pressures on floors and wall bases where ground-
passive soil pressure on the walls maybe limited by water is not considered in the design, for example, where
insertion of a thickness of compressible and durable only one compartment of a two-compartment structure
material and/or by providing a sliding joint between the is filled and leakage occurs.
top of the wall and the underside of the roof. This can be Other measures may also be necessary depending on the
either a temporary free sliding joint that is not cast into a predicted degree of subsidence.
fixed or pinned connection until reflective gravel or other
solar protective material is placed on the roof, ora 2.5.2 Aggressive soils and chemical deterioration
permanently slidingjoint of assessed limiting friction. Chemical analyses of the soil and groundwater are essential
Movement of a roof may occur also where there are where aggressive substances are suspected. Some waters
substantial variations in the temperature of the contained containing dissolved free carbon dioxide, natural acids or
liquid. Where a roof is rigidly connected to a wall this may salts may be aggressive, and it will be necessary to take
lead to additional loading in the wall that shouldbe special precautions. Dissolved salts may cause serious
considered in the design. Earth covering on reservoir roofs deterioration in the concrete and corrosion of the steel.
may be taken as dead load, but due account should be Reference should be made to 6.2 of BS 81 10 : Part 1 :
taken of construction loads from plant and heaped earth, 1985 concerning concrete exposedto sulphate or other
which may exceed the intended design load. attack or susceptibleto alkali-silicareaction, and for the
use of special cements to resist the actionof certain
aggressive substances. In other and more serious conditions,
2.4 Analysis of walls and junctions an impermeable protective coatingof a suitable bituminous
or other compositionmay be used on the surface of the
The liquid pressure on plane walls maybe resisted by a concrete.
combination of horizontal and vertical bending moments.
An assessment should be made of the proportions of the ^.
pressure to be resisted by bending moments in the vertical 2.6 Causes and controlof cracking
and horizontal planes. Allowance should also be made for
the effects of direct tension in walls inducedby flexural 2.6.1 Applied loading effects
action in adjacent walls. Reinforcement should be provided Direct or flexural tensionin the concrete arisingfrom
to resist horizontal bending momentsa t all corners where applied external service loads, from temperature gradients
walls are rigidly joined. due to solar radiation, or from the containment of liquids
Cylindrical structuresmay be constructed with a fixed, a t temperatures above ambient, may cause crackingin the
pinned or sliding joint between the walls andthe concrete. The limitation of cracking from applied loading
foundation slab. Allowance should be made for the is dealt with in 2.2.3.3 and in the appropriate design
calculated flexural actions and hoop tensions. sections. Crack widths arising from flexure and direct
Sections should be,checkedfor shear resistance. tension in mature concrete may be calculatyd as indicate!
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards in appendix B. by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Document provided
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
4
. BSI BS*8007 8 7 m 162Llbb7 0021753 2 W
BS 8007 : 1987
--
||
|
|
|| || || |||
Section. two
2.6.2 Temperature and moisture effects (b) restraints to expansion and contraction bythe
| ||
the concrete cause dimensional changes which, if resisted using a planned sequence of construction or temporary
internally or externally, may crack the concrete. The open sections (see 5.5);
|
* Deformed grade 4 6 0 bars complying with BS 4449 or BS 4 4 6 1 and high-yield wire fabric complying withB> 4483 having a
r \
guaranteed yield or proof stress and guaranteed weld strength.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
5
B S I B S * 8 0 08 7 Lb24bb9 00237.54 Y
BS 8007 : 1987
--
Section two
||
|
|
|| || || |||
| ||
|||| || |
|||| |
include examination of the concrete for cracking, leakage, 2.7.5 Impermeability of the concrete
|
surface deterioration and settlement. Particular attention The concrete should have low permeability. Thisis
|
should be paid to any rust stainsthat might indicate important not only forits direct effect on leakage but also
---
corrosion of the reinforcement. Any defects should then because it is one of the main factors influencing durability,
be corrected. Movement joints should be cleaned and the resistance to leaching, chemical attack, erosion, abrasion,
joint materials replacedif necessary. frost damage and the protection from corrosion of
The designer should also prepare a schedule of precautions embedded steel. The recommendations in this code
to be taken by the user in order to prevent the structure for concrete mixes, aggregates, minimum cement content
being damaged or the design life shortened during use. The and strength, curing and admixtures generallyensure an
schedule should be included in the commissioning adequately impermeable concrete,but it is essential that
documentation. complete compactionwithout segregation is obtained on
site. In some cases an increased cement and water content
2.7.3 Exposure and appearance may be required in order to obtain adequate workability
For the purposes of this code, both faces of a liquid- to ensure complete compactionwithout increasing the
containing or liquid-excluding structuralmember, together waterhement ratio, but inno case should the maximum
with any internal walls and columnsof a containment cement content be exceeded. Alternatively, adequate
structure, are to be considered as subject to severe exposure workability may be achieved by using a lower waterhement
as defined in 3.3.4 of BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985. ratio forthe same cement content: for this a water-reducing
Surfaces subjectedto very severe exposure as defined agent is employed.
in 3.3.4 of BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985 should be designed for
a maximum design crack width of 0.2 mm (see 2.2.3.3)and 2.7.6 Cover
concrete cover and mix complying with the recommenda- The nominal cover of concrete for all steel, including
tions of BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985, as well as 2.7.6 and 6.3. stirrups, links, sheathing, and spacers should benot less
Where significant efflorescenceand staining of the surface than 40 mm. A greater cover may be necessary a t a face in
of the structure wouldbe considered to be unacceptable, contact with aggressive soils (see 2.5.2)or subject to
the recommendations for critical aesthetic appearance erosion or abrasion. If the nominal cover is increased,
should be satisfied (see 2.2.3.3). crack widths will increase, especially flexural and direct
tension cracks in sections less than 300 mm thick.
2.7.4 Durability In thinsections where it is not possible to achieve 40 mm
The recommendations in this code for cover, concrete cover, a higher cementcontent (see 2.7.4)or special
grade, cement content, maximum free waterhement ratio reinforcement (see 7.2)may be used to give a normal
and the means of ensuring a low permeability of the design life.
concrete are intended to meet the durability recommend-
ations that correspond generallywith the recommendations
in table 3,4of BS 81 10: Part 1 : 1985 for severe exposure 2.8 Specification
(see 6.3).Consideration shouldbe given to the effect of the
liquid to be stored on thedurability of all the materials of The designer should consider thefollowing items when
construction, e.g. concrete, reinforcement or prestressing preparing the specificationfor the structureto ensure that
steel and jointing materials: this is especially pertinent to the design assumptions for both materials and workmanship
process liquids and some sewage effluents, although the are realized during construction:
latter are usually deficient in oxygen and not particularly (a) dimensional tolerances for concrete;
aggressive. Similar considerations apply to groundwaters
(b) dimensional tolerancesfor placing reinforcement
(see 2.5.2).Attention is also drawn to the possibility of
and prestressing tendons;
biological attack,especially on the jointing materials.
(c) a scheme for ensuring thequality of the concrete in
The protection afforded by the specifiedcover and a
the structure in terms both of constituent materialsand
correctly designed and fully compacted concrete mix is
of batching, mixing, etc.;
satisfactory for the majority of constructions, but where
extended design life is required for a structure, consideration (d) a scheme for ensuring the quality of the steel
may be given to increasing the cement content (see the reinforcement and prestressing tendons;
next paragraph), increasing the cover(see 2.7.6)or using (e) the positionsand details of all construction and
special reinforcement (see 7.2). movement joints;
A concrete mix withan increased cement content will (f) the requirements for the test for liquid retention or
provide extra protection for the reinforcement, but a exclusion, and any period during whichautogenous
higher cement content will cause more heat of hydration healing is permissible.
and require extra reinforcementin accordance with For the purposes of this code, this clause replaces 2.3 of
appendix A. BS 8110 : Part 1 : 1985.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
6 Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
~.
B S I BS*8007 87 W 162Llbh90021755 b m
BS 8007 : 1987
Section t w O
2.9.1 Statutory safety requirements thän 2.5 m. It is preferable to provide a platform under an
The designer should take accounfof thesafety requirements access hatch. Metal ladders, where provided, should be in
appropriate to the construction and operation of the accordance with class A of BS 422 1 and walkways should
structure issued by the Healthand Safety Executive [I 1 . be in accordance with BS 5395 : Part 3. Step irons in
The requirementsäre available on requestfrom the Health accordance with BS 3572 should be provided where
and Safety Executive. appropriate.
---
|
|
|||| |
|||| || |
| ||
|| || || |||
|
|
||
--
e
/- Y
3.1 General
This section gives methods of analysis and design that wili Compliance with the recommendations for maximum
in general ensure that the recommendationsin section two design surface crackwidth for each class of exposure given
for reinforced concrete structuresare met. in 2.2.3.3 may be achieved by providing adequate
reinforcement a t suitable spacings to resist the appropriate
stresses. The reinforcement provided to control cracking
3.2 Design arising from direct tension in the immature concretemay
be regarded as forming the whole ora part of the
3.2.1 Basis of design reinforcement requiredto control cracking arisingfrom
direct and flexural tension in the mature concrete.
Design and detailing in reinforced concrete shouldbe in Calculations for the different cases should be carried out
accordance with the recommendations givenin section as follows.
three of BS 81 10: Part 1 : 1985, except that:
(a) Direct tension in immature concrete. The crack
(a) references to section two therein should be read in widths arising from restrained shrinkage and heatof
conjunction with section two of this code, which takes hydration movement shouldbe assessed in accordance
precedence; with appendix A.
(b) the design ultimate anchorage bond stresses for (b) Direct tension in mature concrete, The crack widths
horizontal bars in sections in direct tension shouldnot for reinforced concrete members in externally applied
be greater than 0.7 times the values obtainedfrom direct tension shouldbe assessed in accordance with
3.12.8.4 of BS 8110 : Part 1 : 1985; appendix B or they may be deemed to be satisfactory if
(c) maximum design crack widths should be calculated the steel stress in service conditions does not exceed the
in accordance with 3.2.2 of this code, for the exposure appropriate value in table 3.1. Tension resultingfrom
conditions described in 2.7.3 and to the limits given seasonal movement of mature concrete should be
in 2.2.3.3; assessed in accordance with appendix A.
(d) 3.1.2 (basis of design for reinforced concrete)of (c) Flexural tension in mature concrete, The crack
BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985 does not apply; widths should be assessed in accordance with appendix B
(e) for the design of flat slab roofs, the coefficients for or they may be deemed to be satisfactory if the steel
the simplified methodgiven in 3.7.2.7 of BS 81 10: stress in service conditions does not exceed the
Part 1 : 1985 may also be used for analysis a t the appropriate value in table 3.1. The equations in
serviceability limit state, provided that the effective appendix B apply specifically t o members in pure
column head diameters are of the maximum size flexure and direct tension. When a column or other
permitted, based on the shortest span framing into the member is subjected to combined flexural and
column; compressive stresses, or combined flexural and tensile
(f) 3.12.2 (joints) of BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985 is replaced stresses, the calculated flexural strain shouldbe modified
by section five of this code; to allow for the direct strain before estimating the crack
(9) 3.3.1 (nominal cover), including table 3.4,of width.
BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985 is replaced by 2.7.6;
(h) 3.3.4.1 (exposure conditions: general) of Table 3.1 Allowable steel stresses in direct or
BS 81 1O : Part 1 : 1985 is replaced by 2.7.3; flexural tension for serviceability limit states
(j) 3.12.5 (minimum areas of reinforcement in members)
Design
crack Allowable stress
of BS 81 10: Part 1 : 1985 is to be read in conjunction width
with 2.6.2.3 and appendix A. Plain bars* Deformed
barst
---
|
85 1O0
(which covers the calculationof minimum reinforcement, 0.2 115 130
|||| || |
calculation of crack widths in mature concrete). The t Deformed grade 4 6 0 bars complying with BS 4449 or
|| || || |||
calculated crack width is that crack width that has an BS 4461 and high-yield wire fabric complying with BS 4483
acceptable probability of not being exceeded. An occasional having a guaranteedyield or proof stress and guaranteed
|
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
8 Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
E S 1 BS*8007 87 m lb24bb7 0023757 T m
BS 8007 : 1987
Section four
4.1 General
This sectiongives methods of analysis and designthat will direction, after allowance for all losses of prestress and
in general ensure that for prestressed concrete structures on the assumptionthat the topand bottom edges of the
the recommendations in section two are met. wall are free of all restraint.
(e) The bending moments in the vertical direction
should be assessed on the basis of a restraint equal to
A2 Basis of design one-half of thatprovided bya pinned foot, when the
foot of the wall is free to slide. In other cases where
Design should be in accordance with the recommendations sliding a t the foot of the wall is prevented, the moments
given in section four of BS 8110 :Part 1 : 1985 except in the vertical direction should be assessed for the actual
where these are at variance with the specific recommend- degree of restraint a t the wall foot.The tensile stress
ations of this code. In general the design of prestressed arising from vertical moments should not exceed
concrete members in exposure conditions as defined 1.O N/mm2.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
9
-
. B S I BS*800787
~~
m LhZ4hb9 Ü Ö Z ! IJ m
BS 8007 : 1987
Section five
5.1 General
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
B S I BS*800787 m l b 2 4 b b 7 0023757 3
BS 8007 : 1987
Section five
5.3.2.5 Hinged joint. A hinged joint is a joint that transmits (1) It is possible for horizontal cracks-tooccur a t any
thrust and shearing force,but permits rotation with free-standing verticalend because of the change in
minimal restraint. A hinged join€ may be formed either by horizontal restraint with respect to height. For bays of
completely separating the two elements, placing one any height the vertical strain arising from this warping
element in a groove in the other, or by crossingthe effect may be taken as approximately half the
reinforcement a t the junction of the two elements. In horizontal strain, and the vertical steel ratio should not
either case the rotation of one element will nottransfer be less than the critical ratio, pcrit.
moment to the other. (2) The vertical restraint exerted on a newly cast bay
5.3.2.6 Sliding joint. A sliding joint has complete a t a vertical construction joint may be assumedto
discontinuity in both reinforcement and concrete and develop at a depth of 2.4 m fromthe free top surface.
allows relative movementin the plane of the joint. The Thus design for freedom of movement (option 3) may
surface of the concrete onthe lower component shouldbe be used for the vertical reinforcement in the top 2.4 m
flat and smooth so that movement is not restricted. In of a lift. Design for partial restraint (option 2) is
order to prevent bonding betweenthe two faces, a appropriate for vertical steel below this depth.
separating layer or layers of a suitable material shouldbe The choice of design imposes a discipline on construction.
provided to allow movement to take place. It is desirable to achieve minimum restraint to early
thermal contraction ofthe immature concrete in walls and
5.3.3 Spacing of movement joints slabs even though the finished structure may be designed
The provision of movement joints and their spacing are for full continuity. Cracks arising from thermal contraction
dependent on the design philosophy adopted, ¡.e. whether in a roof supported on columns maybe minimized or even
to allow for or restrain shrinkage and thermalcontraction prevented if the roofslab is not tied rigidlyto the walls
in walls and slabs. At one extreme, the designer may during construction.
exercise control by providing a substantial amount of
reinforcement in the formof small diameter bars a t close
spacing with no movementjoints. At the other extreme, 5.4 Constructionjoints
the designer may provide closely spaced movement joints
in conjunction with a moderate proportion of reinforce- The positions of construction joints should be specified by
ment. Between these extremes, control may be exercised the designer and indicated on the drawings. If there is a
by varyingthe reinforcement and joint spacing, an increase need on-site to revise any specified position or to have
in spacing being compensatedfor by an increase in the additional joints the proposed positionsshould be agreed
proportion of reinforcement required. with the designer.
---
The three mainoptions for the designer are summarized Full structural continuity is assumed in design a t a
in table 5.1 as follows. construction joint. Reinforcement is fully continuous
|
|
(a) In option 1 (design for full restraint) no contraction across the joint and the concrete is taken to be as nearly
|||| |
joints are provided within the area designed for monolithic as possible. Cracking in the concrete member
|||| || |
continuity, and crack widths and spacing arecontrolled arising from all thermal and load effects is controlled by
by the reinforcement. Construction joints become part the use of reinforcement.
of the crack pattern and have similar crack widths. The designer should specify thefollowing. | ||
|| || || |||
(b) In option 2 (design for partial restraint) cracking is The concrete a t the joint should be bonded with that
. controlled by the reinforcement, but the joint spacing subsequently placed against it, without provision for
|
is such that some of the daily and seasonal movements relative movement betweenthe two. Concrete should not
|
||
in the mature slab or structural member are be allowed to run to a feather-edge, and vertical joints
--
accommodated a t the joints, so reducing the amount of should be formed against a stop end. Particular care should
movement to be accommodated a t the cracks between be taken when forming the joints.
the joints. The surface of the first pour should be roughened to
(c) In option 3 (design for freedom of movement) increase the bond strength and to provide aggregate
cracking is controlled by the proximity of thejoints, interlock. With horizontal joints, the joint surface should
with a moderate amount of reinforcement provided, be roughened, without disturbing the coarse aggregate
sufficient to transmit movement a t any cracked section particles, by spraying the joint surface, approximately 2 h
to the adjacent movementjoints. Significant cracking to 4 h after the concrete is placed, with a fine spray of
between the adjacent movementjoints should not occur. water and/or brushing with a s t i f f brush. Vertical joints
The options given in table 5.1 are considered in terms of can be treated similarly, if the use of a retarder on the
horizontal movement, but vertical movement in walls stop end is authorized, to enable the joint surface to be
should also be considered. Two cases are as follows. treated after the stop end has been removed.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
I1
BSI BS*B007 87 W l b 2 q b b 9 0 0 2 L 7 b 0 T W
~ ~~~ ~~ ~~
BS 8007 : 1987
Section five
--
||
|
|
|| || || |||
| ||
|||| || |
|||| |
Table 5.1 Design options for control of thermal contraction and restrained shrinkage
|
|
1 Continuous: No joints, but expansion joints a t Minimum Use small size bars a t close
for full restraint wide spacings may be desirable in of Pcrit spacing to avoid highsteel
walls and roofs that are not prot- ratios well in excess of pcrit
ected from solar heat gain or where
the contained liquid is subjected to
a substantial temperature range
2 Semicontinuous: (a) Complete joints, 15 m< Use small size bars but less
for partial restraint (b) Alternate partial and steel than in option 1
complete joints (by
interpolation), 11.25 m
(c) Partial joints, < 7.5 m
3 Close movement joint (a) Complete joints, in metres Restrict thejoint spacing
spacing: for freedom W For options 3(b) and 3(c)
of movement < 4.8 +- e
(b) Alternate partial and
complete joints, in metres
W
<0 . 5 + ~2.4 ~t -
e
~ ~
(c) Partial joints
Smax +e
W
NOTE 1. References should be made t o appendix A for the description of the symbols used in this table and for calculating perlt,
smsX and e.
NOTE 2. In options 1 and 2 the steel ratio will generally exceed pcrit to restrict the crack widths to acceptable values. In option 3
the steel ratio of 2/3 pcrit will be adequate.
If the joint surface is not roughened until the concrete has The width of the open section between adjacent panels
hardened, the larger aggregate particles near the surface should be not greater than 1000 mm. Properly formed
should be exposed by sandblasting or by applyinga scaling construction joints should be provided a t each end of the
hammer or other mechanical device. Powerful hammers temporary open section with the longitudinal reinforcement
should not be used as they may damage or dislodge from each adjacent panel lapping in this area.
aggregate particles so reducing, rather than increasing, Provided that the isolatedpanels satisfy the criteria for
the capacity of the joint to transfer stresses. Care should option 3(a) of table 5.1, only the effects of T 2 ,the
be taken that the joint surface is clean immediately before temperature fall due to seasonal variations (see A.31, need
the fresh concrete is placed against it. It may need to be be considered when designing the complete continuous
dampened prior to the new concrete being placed, to structure.
prevent excessive loss of mix water into it by absorption. Sufficient time shouldbe allowed for all the early
Particular care should be taken in the placing of new thermal movement to take place before the open section
concrete close to the joint to ensure that it has an adequate
is infilled.
fines content and is fully compacted and dense. It is not
necessary to incorporate waterstopsirr properly constructed
construction joints. 5.6 Joints in ground slabs
5.5 Temporary open sections The floor of a structure may be designed t o permit
thermal contraction and shrinkage by minimizing restraints
to movement. A separating layer of 1000 g/m2 polyethylene
Where structural continuity is required in the final
should be provided between thefloor slab and the blinding
structure (e.g. the wall of a rectangular tank) the amount
concrete. Panels may be cast in single bays or in larger areas
of reinforcement required to control early thermal effects
may be reduced by the use of temporary open sections. with induced joints.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
12
B S I BSX800787 W 1624bb9 002L7b1 I m
BS 8007 : 1987
Section five
Alternatively, the floor may be designed as fully restrained. For structural design purposes the horizontal reinforcement
against shrinkage and thermal contraction and shoutdbe should be completely continuousa t vertical joints. A
cast directly onto t h e blinding concrete, central waterstop shouldbe used together with sealing
Frequently, in large structures, thefloor is designed as a compounds on both faces, whether or not any attempt is
series of continuous strips withtransverse induced complete made to achieve concrete continuity.
contraction jointsprovided to ensure that cracking occurs
in predetermined positions. Longitudinal joints between 5.8 Joints in roofs
the strips should form complete contraction joints.
Roof slabs are generally designed as flat slabs, in which case
all interior joints shouldbe construction joints so that the
5.7 Joints in walls slab is structurally monolithic. Early thermal effects and
subsequent temperature effects shouldbe considered.
Walls may be designed as fully restrained against thermal Roofs, even those covered by soil, may be subjected to a
contraction and shrinkage, or the restraints may be reduced larger thermal change than the walls and flöor, but if the
by providing movement joints in accordance with table5.1. roof is not connected monolithically to the wall the
0 Where the wall is designed to be monolithic with the base
slab, a kicker should be cast at thesame time as, and
subsequent temperature effectsmay be disregarded
(¡.e. reinforcement to control cracking is based only on T l ,
integrally with, the slab. The height of the kicker should be the fall in temperature between the hydrationpeak and
a t least 75 mm to enable the next lift of formwork to fit ambient (see A.5)). .
tightly and to avoid leakage of cement grout from the Where roofs and walls are monolithic, movement jointsin
newly deposited concrete. The jointin this position will be roofs should correspond with thosein the walls to avoid
a construction joint, and although it is recommended that the possibility of sympathetic cracking. The final
wall panels are cast in one lift, any necessary extra connection between the roof and walls should not be made
horizontal joints will be construction joints. until the roof is insulated. If, however, provision is made
In walls to circular strucfures, oneof the predominant by means of a sliding joint for movement between theroof
forces from the liquid pressure is horizontal hoop tension. and walls, correspondence o f t h e joints is less important.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
13
BS 8007 : 1987
Section five
Wall FIoor
Sealing compound on Non-absorbent Sealing compound Non-absorbent
one or bothfaces h
,joint filler
No steel No steel
continuity continuity
Formed
Sealing compound on No concretecontinuity Jointsealing No concretecontinuity
one or bothfaces\ and no initial gap compound andno initial gap
Wall <:P,',:'d ;'Y*: Floor
No s t e e l
continuity
Waterstóp
Induced
Sealing compound on
one or both
facesL , crack
Waterstopwith pa;k
inducingupstand
Formed
Sealing compound on No concretecontinuity
one or both faces, andno initial aao
Watersto; 7
Waterstop'
Induced
Sealing compound on Induced crack
one or b o t h f a c e s i /
.'O.'...
' .! -':,:.a
.. . .,.. D .., /. L. , .... .
.I C.'
, J.
.:r
. .:. .
'
o i, 6.'. 1;'
Central crack '
inducing waterstop
(c) Partial contraction joints
This sectiongives methods of specifying, producing and The workability of the concrete shouldbe specified in
assessing concrete for compliance that will in general ensure relation to the equipment and methodsof handling and
that the strength, durability and impermeability will be compaction, so that theconcrete is placed without
adequate for liquid-retainingstructures. Thë recommend- segregation, fully compacted, surrounds all reinforcement,
ations in section six of BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985 apply tendons and ducts andcompletely fills the formwork.It is
except where these are amendedby this code. particularly importantto ensure that fullcompaction is
obtained in the vicinity of construction
and movement
joints, embedded water bars, tendon anchorages, pipes, etc.
6.2 Materials
6.2.1 Cements, ground granulated blastfurnaceslags 6.5 Surlace finishof concrete
(g.g.b.s) and pulverized-fuel ashes (p.f.a.1
0 Th-ese are to beused as specified in 6.1.2 of EIS 81 10 :
Part 1 : 1985 except that for normal use the target mean
t h e type of surface finish to be given to any member will
depend on its position in the structure, its exposure, whether
proportion of g.g.b.s, should not exceed 50 %.This applies or not it is to receive an applied finish and the properties of
to blended cements (6.1.2.1(bI) and combinations made a t the liquid to be stored. The recommendationsin 6.10 of
the mixer (6.1.2.1(d)). The target mean proportion ofp.f.a. BS 81 10 : Part 1 : 1985 apply.
should not exceed 35 % as stated in BS 81 10: Part 1. It is not possible to ensure that a reinforced concrete
NOTE. In this code theterm 'cement' means Portland cementof a member will remain uncracked. It is recommended,
combination of Portland cement andg.g.b.s. in accordance with therefore, that any member that is to be permanently
BS 6699 or p.f.a. in accordance with BS 3892 : Part 1, untess exposed t o view is provided with a profile and type of
otherwise stated.
finish that tend to minimize the effects of any surface
marking.
6.2.2Aggregates
Aggregates to be used should comply with either BS 882
or B§ 1047 and have an absorption, as measured in
accordance with B§ 812 : Part 2 : 1975, generally not
6.6 Blinding layer
greater than 3 %.
NOTE. Coarse aggregates with a l o w c o e f f i c i e n t o f t h e r m a l Where walls orfloors are founded onthe ground a screeded
expansion are preferred (see 63s 8110 : Part 2 : 1985). layer of plain concrete not less than 75 mm thick should be
placed over the ground.
-
maximum cement content may be increased to
0 500kg/m3 or 550 kg/m3respectively.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT f
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
BS 8007 : 1987
Section seven
7.1 General
The provisions of section seven of BS 81 10: Part 1 : 1985 essential that the coating process is undertaken in factory
apply. conditions, and as there is no British Standard,
ASTM A775/A775M-84 should be complied with as a
minimum, in respect of the coating.
7.2 Special reinforcement
7.2.3 Stainless steel reinforcement
7.2.1 Galvanizedreinforcement Bar reinforcement in accordance with the preferred range
Normal bar and fabric reinforcement may be hot-dip zinc of sizes given in BS 6744 should be used.
coated in accordance with BS 729. The minimum coating
thickness should be 85 Fm. 7.2.4 Bondstrength
It may be assumed for the design that the bond strengthof
7.2.2 Epoxy coated reinforcement deformed bar types 1 and 2 is not affected by hot-dip zinc
Reinforcement may be epoxy powder coated with the coating or epoxy coating.
coating bonded byan electrostatic fusion process. It is NOTE, No guidance can be given for coated plain surface bars.
---
|
|
|||| |
|||| || |
| ||
|| || || |||
|
|
||
--
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
16 Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
L
B S I BS*800787 W Lb24bb7 00217b5 7 W
BS 8007 : 1987
Section eight
8.1 General
||
|
|
|| || || |||
1985.
|||| || |
|||| |
|
|
---
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
17
BS 8007 : 1987
Section nine
---
|
|
|||| |
9.1 General practicable, be carried out from the liquid face. When a
|||| || |
remedial lining is applied to inhibit leakage a t a crack it
should have adequate flexibility and have no reactionwith
Inspection and testing of structures should be carried out
| ||
the stored liquid.
in accordance with 2.8. Testing for liquid tightness should
|| || || |||
Should the structure not satisfy the 7day test, then after
be in accordance with 9.2 and 9.3.
the completion of the remedial work it should be refilled
|
and if necessary left fora further stabilizing period;
|
||
a further test of 7 days' duration should then be undertaken
9.2 Testing of structures
--
in accordance with this clause.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
BSI BSikOO7 8 7 m l b 2 4 b b 7 002l7b7 2
BS 8007 : 1987
Appendix A
Appendices
Table A.l Factors for the calculation of minimum reinforcement* for crack
...
distribution and crack spacing (in immature concrete: thermal movementdominant)
~
Concrete Pcrit
grade
Grade 250 460 Deformed bars, Plain round bars, Grade
fb 1.6 N/mmz type 2,
f b 2.4 N/mm2
* Although tlreexpression 'minimumreinforcement' is used it is possible t o have 2/3 p,,it under option 3 of tb ' r a I ,
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
I
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
19
BS 8007 : 1987
Appendix A
--
||
|
|
|| || || |||
| ||
|||| || |
|||| |
|
|
---
Over
500 mn
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
20 Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
BSI BSX8007 8 7 W 1b2qbb7 00217b9 b W
BS 8007 : 1987
Appendix A
The width of a fully developed crack arisingfrom drying T l is the fall in temperature between the hydration
shrinkage and thermal movement contraction in restrained peak and ambient.
walls and slabs may be obtained from: Alternatively, the above may be expressed as:
Wmax = Smax e Wmax = Smax R T1
where where
W,, is the estimatedmaximum crack width: R is the restraint factor, being the restrained proportion
of the theoretical linear thermalor shrinkage
smOx is the estimated likely maximum crack spacing;
movement, taken as 0.5 for immature concretewith
e is the effective strainand is obtained from: rigid end restraints, after allowing for theinternal
e = [ecs+ et, - (100 x 10P 11 creep of the concrete.
where A low (Y significantly reduces the percentage of thermal
ea is the estimatedshrinkagestrain; crack control reinforcement required to restrict crack
et, is the estimated total thermal contraction after widths (see table 7.3 of BS 81 10 : Part 2 : 1985 for typical
peak temperature arisingfrom thermal effects. values).
Table A.2 Typical values of T l for OPC concretes, where more particular
information is not available
3 1 2 4
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
21
BS 8007 : 1987
Appendix A
A concrete placing temperature higher than that assumed A.4 Internal restraint in thick sections
in table A.2 can be expected in the U K on a t least a few
days each year, but because of the lower total heat evolved
For thick sections, major causes of cracking are the
with higher placing temperatures,massive sections are
differences in temperature that develop between the
unlikely to show more than a 15 % increase over that given
surface zones and the coreof the section (see 3.8.4.1 (a) of
in table A.2. In thinsections, where the rate of heat
BS 81 10 : Part 2 : 1985). The thickness of concretethat
evolution is controlling the temperaturerise, higher placing
can be considered within the 'surface zone' is somewhat
temperatures, coupled with high daily temperatures, can
arbitrary. However, site observations have indicated that
substantially increase the temperature rise overthat given
the zone thicknesses for h > 500 mm in figures A.l and
in table A.2, but these temperature rises cannot be greater
A.2 are appropriate for thick sections, and the procedure
than those for massive sections.
for calculating thermal crack control reinforcementin
The designer should consider whetherit is necessary to thick sections is then the same as for thinsections.
assume a maximum concrete placing temperature of 25 OC
for special UK conditions, such as hot weather and long-
haul distances, to ensure that design assumptions are not
significantly exceeded.
A.5 External restraint factors
The minimum and maximum cement content shouldbe
Effective externalrestraint may be taken as 50 X of the
specified, and the design should be based on the specified
total external restraint because of internal creep. Reference
maximum permitted content,unless the actual maximum
was made in A.3 to movement joints that greatly reduce
is known.
the rigid external restraint assumed for continuous walls.
In addition to the temperature fall T l there can be a However, there are other situations where the assumed
further fall in temperature, T z ,because of seasonal external restraint factor R can be less than 0.5. Some
variations. The consequent thermal contractions occur in typical situations for thinsections subjectedto external
the mature concretefor which the factorscontrolling restraint are illustrated in figure A.3 and allow for any
cracking behaviour are substantially modified. The ratio of beneficial internal restraints.
the tensile strength of the concrete to the average bond Note that no thermal crackingis likely to occur within
strength, fctlfb, is appreciably lower for mature concrete. 2.4 m of a free edge since experience has shown that this
In addition, the restraint along the base of the member is the length of wall or floor slab over which the tensile
tends to be much more uniform and less susceptible to strain capacity of the concreteexceeds the increasing
stress raisers, since a considerable shear resistance can be restrained contraction, therestraint factor varying between
--
developed along the entire length of the constructionjoint. zero a t the free edge to a maximum of 0.5 a t 2.4 m from
||
|
Although precise data are not available for these effects, the free edge. Note that cracking can occur near the ends
|
|| || || |||
a reasonable estimate is t o assume that the combined effect if stress inducers suchas pipes occur within this 2.4 m
of these factors, in conjunction with creep, is to reduce the length of wall or slab. However, if not less than 213 pcrit,
estimated contraction by half, Hence the value of wmaX based on the surface zones, is provided and there are no
| ||
when taking an additional seasonal temperature fall into obvious stress raisers, it may be assumed that the free ends
|||| || |
account is given by: of the members will move inwards without cracking up to
|||| |
or
parentheses in figure A.3 and should be assumed 141.
---
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
L
B S I B S U B 0 0 7 87 m 162Ltbb90021771 4 m
BS 8007 : 1987
Appendix A
- 2.4 m4 2.4m cl
I L
I
Horizontalrestraintfactor.
Obtain from table A.3
for this central zone cracks H
aH d0.2 Whichever is
---
the greater
|
|
|||| |
Ot Ot
|||| || |
| ||
|| || || |||
|
|
||
--
I”--
%Where L 6 24 these restraint factors
L =0.5(1--L )
2H
(c) Sequential bay wall construction (with construction joints) NOTE. Values of R used in the design should be related to the
practical distribution of reinforcement.
Figure A.3 Restraint factor R for various wall and floor slab placing sequences
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
23
BS 8007 : 1987
Appendices A and B
being considered
||
3 0.5" 0.05t
|||| || |
4 0.5t 0.3t
s8 0.5t 0.5t B.2 Assessment of crackwidths in flexure
|||| |
*H is the height or width toa free edge; Provided that the strainin the tension reinforcement is
|
t These values can be less if L < 4.8 m. to 0.45fc,, the design surface crack width should not
exceed the appropriate value given in 2.2.3.3 and may be
calculated from equation (1).
The effective external restraint in ground slabs cast on
3acr em
smooth" blinding concrete for theseasonal temperature
variation Tz may be taken as being the design restraint
factor R = 0-5a t the mid-length, for 30 m lengths and over,
W =
1 t 2 (".;;_",-in )
and it may be assumed to vary uniformly from 0.5 to zero where em is assessed in accordance with 8.3.
a t the ends.
B.5 Assessment of crack widths in direct joints should take into account their performance
--
tension
|
appropriate value given in 2.2.3.3 and may be calculated and the concretesurfaces between which theyare to
|||| || |
from equation (4) provide a liquid-tight seal. Joint sealing compounds cannot
(4) be expected to provide a liquid-tight seal for more than a
|||| |
W = 3a,, ,e
proportion of the life of the structure, and waterstops
where e, is assessed in accordance with B.6.
|
7-
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
25
BS 8007 : 1987
Appendix C
section five and illustrated in figure 5.1. It is essential that should be applied in conditions of completedryness and
the concrete placed around the waterstop is well compacted cleanliness. There are joint sealing compoundsthat are
and that the waterstop be fixed and maintained firmly in
| ||
Waterstops may be divided into four categories. The first correctly to adequately prepared surfaces. It is necessary
category, known as the central-bulb type,is used in walls that the corners of the concrete each sideof the joint are
|
joints. The central bulb is positioned across the joint, and avoid water by-passing the sealant through the concrete.
the main waterstopis set parallel to the water-surface of
BS 6213 : 1982 provides guidance on types of construct-
the concrete wall. Thereis a solid bulb or wing a t each end
ional sealant and on their selection and correct application,
of this type of waterstop, which is made of rubber or
so enabling the specifierto select appropriately from
flexible plástics such as PVC. The distance of the waterstop
table 4 of that standard. This table lists the main types of
from the nearest exposed concrete face should not be less sealants, their suitability for the different types of joints
than half thewidth of the waterstop. The second category in a variety of liquid-retaining structures. Table4 and
is similar to the first category but has no central bulb. It is sections six and seven of BS 6213 : 1982 give guidance on
set in a similar manner to category one, but should be used the method of application of the sealants. Table 2
only in contraction, partial contraction and construction provides an expected service life for the varioustypes, with
joints. The third category, consisting of surface types of an indication that 20 years is a reasonable maximum,
waterstop, is mainly used on the undersides of concrete although in favourable conditions a longer service life may
slabs, and sometimes on the outer face of walls that are be obtained.
backfilled. These waterstops areset into the surfaceof the
In floor joints, the sealing compound is usually applied in
concrete each side of contraction or partial contraction
a chase formed in the surface of the concrete along theline
joints that are formed. They are also used with a central
of the joint. The actual minimumwidth will depend on the
crack-inducing tonguefor induced contractionjoints. To
known characteristics of the material.In floorjoints of the
secure good compaction of the concreteagainst the water-
expansion type, the sealantis supported by thejoint filler.
stop it should be fixed to a base of blinding concrete or
In floorjoints, retention of the sea[ant is assisted by gravity,
formwork. The use of a surface waterstop is sometimes
and in many cases sealing can be delayed until just before
specified at construction joints. This typeof waterstop is
the structure is put intoservice, so that the amountof joint
usually formed from rubber or flexible plasticssuch as PVC.
opening subsequentlyto be accommodated is small. The
The fourth category of waterstop is a rigid type and is
chase should be neither too narrow nor too deep to hinder
specified when, as in construction joints, no movement is
expected a t the joint but a positive waterstop is required complete filling and should be primed before thesealing
because of the pressure of the contained liquid as in a compound is applied. Here again, a wider joint demands a
pressure pipeline. Such waterstops are usuallyformed from smaller percentage distortion in the material.
copper or steel strip. Vertical joints in walls should be primed where necessary
The design of the structure should generally provide for and then sealed on the liquid-facewith a sealant that is
the continuity of the waterstop system acrossall joints usually pressured by gun or knife into the preformed chase.
and particularly junctions between floor and wall systems. The sealants should have non-slumping properties and great
The correct procedurefor making the runningjoints on extensibility.
site using heat fused butt welds for PVC, vulcanized or The long-term performanceof a joint sealing compound
pocketed sleeve joints for rubber and brazed or welded lap depends on its formulation, the workmanshipwith which
joints for copper or steel needs to be adopted. Intersections it is prepared and appliedas well as the circumstances of
and special junctions such as those that arise between the structure. It would be unwise to depend on the sealing
rubber and PVC shouldbe prefabricated. compound for liquid-tightness in the long termand that
should be provided by the waterstop.The sealing
Metal waterstops can be lapped instead of welded, provided
compound should maintainstability a t the face of the joint
that the gap between them is 5 mm greater than the
and preclude the ingress of any hard objectsthat could
specified size of the coarse aggregate. f -.
impair joint movements.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
26
BS 8007 : T987
Appendix D
Appendix D. Bibliography
1. HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE. Aiticlesand 4. HUGHES, B.P. Elimination of shrinkage and cracking in
substances for use at work,Guidance noteGS 8, a water-refainingstructure, Technical note 36, CI RIA,
August 1977. London 1971.
HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE. Entry into Further reading
confined spaces, Guidance note GS 5,June 1980.
5. WATER AUTHORITIES ASSOCIATION. Civil
HEALTH AND SAFETY EXECUTIVE. Occupational engineering specification for thewater industry,
exposure limits, Guidance note EH 40/85, April 1985. 2nd edition, 1984.
2. HUGHES, B.P. Control of thermal and shrinkage 6. ANCHOR, R.D. and HUGHES, B.P. Guide to BS8UU7,
cracking in restrained reinforced concrete walls, Institution of Structural Engineers, London (to be
Technical note 21, CI R IA, London 1976. published).
3. HARR ISON, T.A. Early-age thermal crack control in 7. ANCHOR, R.D. Design of liquidretaining concrete
concrete, Report no. 91, CIRIA, London 1981. structures, Surrey University Press, Glasgow 1981.
O
---
|
|
|||| |
|||| || |
| ||
|| || || |||
|
|
||
--
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
Publicationsreferred to
BS 729 Specification for hot dip galvanizedcoatings on iron and steel articles
BS 812 Testing aggregates
Part 2 Methods for determination ofphysical properties
BS 882 Specification for aggregates from natural sources for concrete
BS 1047 Specification for air-cooled blastfurnace slag aggregate for use in construction
BS 3572 Specification for access fittings for chimneys and other high structures in concrete or brickwork
BS 3892 Pulverized-fuel ash
Part 1 Specification for pulverized-fuel ash for use as a cementitious componentin structural concrete
BS 4221 Specification for ladders for permanent access to chimneys, other high structures, silos and bins
BS 4449 Specification for hot rolled steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete
BS 4461 Specification for cold worked steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete
BS 4483 Specification for steel fabric for the reinforcement of concrete
BS 5395 Stairs,laddersandwalkways
Part 3 Code of practice for the design of industrial typestairs, permanent ladders and walkways
BS 6213 Guide to selection of constructional sealants
BS 6699 Specification for ground granulated blastfurnace slag for use with Portland cement
BS 6744 Specification for austenitic stainless steel bars for the reinforcement of concrete
BS 8110 Structural use of concrete
Part 1 Code of practice for design and construction
Part 2 Code of practice for special circumstances
PD 6501 The preparation of British Standards for building and civil engineering
*Part 1 Guide to the types of British Standard, their aims, relationship, content and application
ASTM A775/A775M-84 Specification for epoxy coated reinforcing steel bars, 01.04, American Society for Testing and Materials
Philadelphia 1984
NOTE. See also bibliography.
---
|
|
|||| |
|||| || |
| ||
|| || || |||
|
|
||
--
is blank -
* Referred to inthe foreword only.
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.
BS 8007 : 1987
This British Standard, havingbeen prepared under the direction of implementing the standard, ofnecessary details such as symbols and
the Civil Engineering and Building Structures Standards Committee, size, type or grade designations. Enquiries should be addressedto
was published under the authority of the Board of BSI and comes the Publications Manager, BSI, Linford Wood, Milton Keynes
into effect on 30 October 1987. MK14 6LE. The number for telephone enquiriesis 0908 220022
O British Standards Institution, 1987 and for telex 825777.
ISBN O 580 16134 X Contract requirements. A British Standard does not purport to
include all the necessary provisions of a contract. Users of British
The following BSI references relate to the work on this standard: Standards are responsiblefor their correct application.
Committee reference CSEl60 Draft for comment 86/12222 DC
Revision of British Standards. British Standards are revised, when
British Standards Institution. Incorporated by Royal Charter, BSI is necessary, by the issue either of amendments or of revised editions.
the independent national body for the preparation of British It is important that users of British Standards should ascertainthat
Standards. It is the UK member of the International Organization they are in possession of the latest amendments or editions.
for Standardization and UK sponsor of the British National
Automatic updating service. BSI provides an economic, individual
Committee of the International Electrotechnical Commission.
and automatic standards updating service called PLUS. Details are
In addition to the preparation and promulgationof standards, BSI available from BSI Enquiry Section a t Milton Keynes, telephone
offers specialist services including the provision of information 0908 221 166, telex 825777.
through the BSI Library and Standardline Database; Technical Help
to Exporters; and other services. Advice can be obtained from the Information on all BSI publications is in the ES/ Catalogue,
Enquiry Section, BSI, Milton Keynes MK14 6LE, telephone supplemented each month by BSI News which is available to
0908 221166, telex 825777. subscribing membersof BSI and gives details of new publications,
Copyright. Users of British Standards are reminded that copyright revisions, amendments andwithdrawn standards. Any person who,
subsists in all BSI publications. No part of this publication may be when making use of a British Standard, encounters an inaccuracy or
reproduced in any form without the prior permission in writing of ambiguity, is requested to notify BSI without delay in order that
BSI. This does not preclude the freeuse, in the course of the matter may be investigated and appropriate action taken.
British Standards Institution 2 Park Street London WIA 2BS Telephone 01-629 9000 Telex 266933
a
8801-7-2k-B
COPYRIGHT 2002; British Standards Institution on ERC Specs and Standards Document provided by IHS Licensee=/5910986001, User=, 10/11/2002 22:12:00 MDT
Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document Policy
Management Group at 1-800-451-1584.