Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: DIOSA M. JIMENEZ Name of Rater: ELIZABETH T. DIMLA


Position: TEACHER I Position: PRINCIPAL III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: PAMPANGA Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year


Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio Knowledge knowledge of tool (COT) rating sheet
n and content within and/or inter-observer
Services Pedagogy and across agreement form about
curriculum knowledge of content
teaching areas. within and across
curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs developed
highlighting integration of
content knowledge within Efficiency
and across subject areas
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration
in other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify Timeliness
and provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Basic 2. Used a range 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio of teaching tool (COT) rating sheet
n strategies that and/or inter-observer
Services enhance learner agreement form about
achievement in teaching strategies that
literacy and enhance learner
numeracy skills. achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs used in teaching
highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or Efficiency
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in Timeliness
teaching
5. Results of assessment
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Basic 3. Applied a 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio range of tool (COT) rating sheet
n teaching and/or inter-observer
Services strategies to agreement form about
develop critical teaching strategies to
and creative develop critical and
thinking, as well creative thinking, as well
as other higher- as other higher-order
order thinking thinking skills
skills. 2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs used in teaching
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and Efficiency
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in Timeliness
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio Environment classroom tool (COT) rating sheet
n and structure to and/or inter-observer
Services Diversity of engage agreement form about
Learners learners, managing classroom
individually or in structure that engages
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
groups, in learners in various Efficiency
meaningful activities
exploration, 2. Lesson plans/modified
discovery and DLLs highlighting various
hands-on classroom management
activities within strategies that engage
a range of learners in activities/tasks
physical learning in different physical Timeliness
environments. learning environments
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Educatio learner behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or
n constructively by inter-observer agreement
Services applying positive form about teacher
and non-violent management of learner
discipline to behavior using the following
ensure learning- strategies:
focused 1. Providing motivation Efficiency
environments. 2. Praising the
learners/Giving positive
feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to
express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal Timeliness
opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to
ask questions
8. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio differentiated, tool (COT) rating sheet
n developmentally and/or inter-observer
Services appropriate agreement form about
learning using differentiated,
experiences to developmentally
address appropriate learning
learners’ experiences
gender, needs, 2. Lesson plans/modified
strengths, DLLs developed Efficiency
interests and highlighting differentiation
experiences. in content, product,
process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process,
learning environment or
Timeliness
others according to
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and
experiences
4. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Basic 3. 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio Curriculum managed and tool (COT) rating sheet
n and implemented and/or inter-observer
Services Planning developmentally agreement form about
sequenced using developmentally
teaching and sequenced teaching and
learning learning process
processes to 2. Lesson plans/modified
meet curriculum DLLs highlighting
requirements developmentally
and varied sequenced instruction Efficiency
teaching that meet curriculum
contexts. goals and varied teaching
contexts
3. Instructional materials
used to implement
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning process to meet
curriculum requirements
and varied teaching
contexts
4. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of Quality
collegial teachers on
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetings with
use teacher and proof of attendance
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
to enrich sessions on use of Efficiency
teaching teacher and learner
practice. feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio developed, tool (COT) rating sheet
n organized and and/or inter-observer
Services used agreement form about
appropriate using appropriate
teaching and teaching and learning
learning resources, including ICT
resources, Examples: Efficiency
including ICT, to  Activity sheets/task
address learning sheets/work sheets
goals.  PowerPoint
presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified Timeliness
DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials
appended
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality
Educatio Assessment selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
n and organized and and/or inter-observer
Services Reporting used diagnostic, agreement form about
formative and using diagnostic,
summative formative and summative
assessment assessment strategies
strategies 2. Prepared lesson
consistent with plans/modified DLLs
curriculum highlighting appropriate
requirements. use of formative
assessment strategies
3. Developed diagnostic
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b) Efficiency
with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample
accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
Basic 11. Monitored 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality
Educatio and evaluated written work with
n learner progress summary of results and
Services and with signature of parents
achievement 2. Formative/summative
using learner assessment tools with Efficiency
attainment data. TOS and frequency of
errors with identified least
mastered skills
3. Class records/grading
sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified Timeliness
DLLs showing index of
mastery
5. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 12. 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Educatio Communicated corrected test papers of
n promptly and the same 3 learners in the
Services clearly the same learning area with
learners’ needs, parents’ or guardians’
progress and signature and date of
achievement to
receipt
key
2. Minutes of PTA meetings Efficiency
stakeholders,
including or Parent-Teacher
parents/guardia conferences in all quarters
ns. with proof of
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s
or guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported by
minutes of meeting Timeliness
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Ratin Results
Target Remarks Rating Remarks
g
various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress
and achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition Quality


Educatio Factor various related or Participation
n works/activities 2. Certificate of Training
Services that contribute to 3. Certificate of Speakership
the teaching- 4. Committee involvement
learning 5. Advisorship of Co-
process. curricular activities
Efficiency
6. Book or Journal
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contributorshi
p
7. Coordinatorship/
Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers Timeliness
10. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like