MJB 16+785 DC 201 Abut

This document is the property of Sheladia Associates, INC must not be passed on to any third person or firm not
authorised by us, nor be copied/made use of in full or part by such person
18.04.23 0 INITIAL SUBMISSION CS RCB -

DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED
REVISIONS
CLIENT :
ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF (R&B) State Roads & CRN, Roads and Building Department Government of Telangana.
or firm without our prior permission writing
DESIGN CONSULTANT :
SHELADIA ASSOCIATES INC
PROJECT :
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING & STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD
FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN
KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT.
Road Section
GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0
TO 21/0
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES TITLE :

NAME SIGN DATE
MAJOR BRIDGE AT CH: 16+785 (DES)
DSGN CS 18.04.23
CHKD RCB 18.04.23

DESIGN OF ABUTMENT AND ABUTMENT FOUNDATION FOR A1
APPD - 18.04.23
CODE REV.
DOC. No. R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201
IRC 0
RELEASED FOR PRELIMINARY TENDER INFORMATION APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION

CONTENTS
Sl. No. Item Description Page
1.0 Design Data 1
2.0 Load Calculations 4
3.0 Carriageway Live Load Calculations 12
4.0 Horizontal Force Calculations 16
6.0 Wind load 17
7.0 Stability Checks for Different Load Cases 19
8.0 Design of Abutment Shaft 25
Biaxial Stress Check 31
9.0 Design of Heel and Toe Slab 34
10.0 Crack width calculations 40
11.0 Design of Solid Return Wall 43
12.0 Design of Dirt Wall 53
13.0 Design of Abutment Cap 57

ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF (R&B)
State Roads & CRN, Roads and Building Department SHELADIA ASSOCIATES INC
Government of Telangana.
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING &
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR)
PROJECT:
TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF ABUTMENT AND ABUTMENT FOUNDATION FOR A1
CS RCB
1.0 Span Arrangement
Span Arrangement (c/c of bearing) = 4 x 19.000 m

Span Arrangement (c/c of Exp. Joint) = 4 x 20.000 m
Dist. Betn c/l of exp jt to c/l of brg = 0.500 m = 0.500 m
Projection of deck beyond c/l of brg = 0.480 m (Square)

Width of Expansion Gap = 0.040 m (Square)
Skew Angle = 0.00 Deg = 0.000 radians
No. of Lane loading for design = 3 (2 for 2Lane loading or 3 for 3Lane loading)
1.1 Reduced Levels
FRL near crash barrier / median edge = 291.120 m

Cross Camber = 2.5 %
FRL at outermost bearing location = 290.970 m
Depth of the superstructure = 1.900 m (including edge beam min Thickness)
Thickness of wearing course = 0.065 m
Soffit Level = 289.005 m
Thickness of bearing & pedestal = 0.296 m
Abutment Cap Top Level = 288.709 m
Abutment Cap Bottom Level(Rec.) = 288.409 m
Abutment Cap Bottom Level(Trep.) = 288.109 m
HFL = 287.800 m
LWL = 280.460
Bed Level at A1 = 283.960 m
Pucca Floor Level = 283.960 m
Max Scour Level = 283.460 m Dist between Abut cap top to top of footing 5.7490
Actual Foundation Level = 280.960 m Height of abutment shaft up to bottom of cap 5.149
Design Foundation Level = 280.460 10.160
Total Height from FRL to Actual Founding Level
10.660
Total Height from FRL to Design Founding Level
1.2 Dimensional details of structural components
Heel Toe
Width = 4.800 m Width = 4.000 m
Thickness at root = 2.000 m Thickness at root = 2.000 m
Tip Thickness = 0.500 m Tip Thickness = 0.500 m
Length of constant depth of heel = 0.000 m Length of constant depth of toe = 0.000 m
Abutment Shaft Abutment Cap

Width at top = 1.200 m Width at top of Rect. part = 1.420 m
Width at bottom = 1.600 m Width at bottom of Trap. Part = 1.200 m
Height = 5.649 m Thickness of rect part at top = 0.300 m
Length = 12.000 m Thickness of trap. part at bot. = 0.300 m
Batter on Earth side = 1 H : 14.1 V Length 12.000 m
Solid Return Wall Cantilever Wall

Thickness at top = 0.500 m Thickness = 0.500 m
Thickness at bottom = 0.600 m Length = 0.000 m
Length at bottom = 4.800 m Height at root = 0.000 m
Height at Root = 8.595 m Height at tip (free end) = 0.500 m
Height at outer End = 10.095 m No of cantilever walls provided = 0
No of return walls provided = 2 2
Page 1
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
Dirt Wall
Thickness = 0.400 m
Height = 2.411 m
Length = 12.000 m
Total Base Width = 10.400 m Total Base Length = 12.000 m

Total Height = 10.660 m Base Width/Height Ratio = 0.98
Radius of Curvature = 900 m Design speed of the vehicle = 100 kmph

Superelevation = 2.5 %
Number of bearings at abutment = 5
1.3 Loads and Forces from Superstructure
Dead Load Reaction = 1800.00 kN Trans. Ecc. of DL = 0.000 m

SIDL Reaction = 482.00 kN Trans. Ecc. of SIDL = 0.000 m
FPLL Reaction = 105.750 kN Trans. Ecc. of FPLL = 0.000 m
Max. CWLL Reaction = 1007.487 kN
Min. CWLL Reaction = 362.790 kN
C/C distance between the bearing = 3.000 m
Height of crash barrier = 1.20 m
Type of Bearing ("t" for Tar Paper, = e

"e" for Elasomeric & "p1" for fixed and "p2" for free POT/PTFE bearing)
congestion factor as per IRC:6 2014 = 1.150

1.4 clase
Earth204.4
Pressure Parameters Rankines or Coulumbs ("r" or "c") c
The fill behind abutment and return wall shall conform to specifications given in appendix-6 of IRC:78-2000.
Angle of Repose of Soil f = 30.00 Degree

Cohesion C = 0.00 kN/m^2
Cohesion for sliding check c = 0.00 kN/m^2
Coeff. of friction at base between soil & conc. m = 0.700
Height of Water Table above foundation Hwt = 0.0 m
Batter of Stem wall with vertical a = 4.05 Degree

Batter of Return wall with vertical a = 0.67 Degree
Inclination of Backfill with horizontal b = 0.00 Degree
Angle of Wall friction d = 20.00 Degree
Equiv. Ht. of backfill for Live load surcharge heb = 1.20 m

Equiv. Ht. of earth for L. L surcharge, Slip road Side htoe = 0.00 m
Unit weight of Soil (dry) gb = 20.00 kN/m^3

Unit weight of Soil (submerged) gsub = 10.00 kN/m^3
Unit weight of concrete for stability check gc = 25.00 kN/m^3
Unit weight of concrete (submerged) = 15.00 kN/m^3
Unit weight of concrete for Abutment design gc = 23.50 kN/m^3
As per Geo technical data.
Allowable Bearing Capacity (Normal Case) = 300.00 kN/m^2
Allowable Bearing Capacity (Seismic Case) = 375.00 kN/m^2
Allowable Bearing Capacity (Wind Case) = 399.00 kN/m^2
Active Earth pressure Coefficient for Stability Ka = 0.279
Passive Earth pressure Coefficient for Stability Kp = 0.000

Active Earth pressure Coefficient for design of stem Ka = 0.308
Active Earth pressure Coefficient for design of returnwall Ka = 0.284
Page 2
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
Seismic earth pressure For Maximum Case(For Stability) Seismic earth pressure For Maximum Case(For Design)
Seismic Ca = 0.359
ah= 0.060 ah= 0.060
av= 0.04 av= 0.00
f= 30.00 degrees = 0.524 radians f= 30.00 0.524 radians
l= 3.30 degrees = 0.058 radians l= 3.30 0.058 radians
β= 0.00 0.000 radians β= 0.00 0.000 radians
d= 20.00 degrees = 0.349 radians d= 20.00 0.349 radians
a= 4.05 degrees = 0.071 radians a= 4.05 0.071 radians
Ca = 1.0040 x 0.380 x cos d Ca = 0.9653 x 0.380 x cos d
= 0.359 = 0.345
Seismic earth pressure For Minimum Case

Seismic Ca = 0.335
ah= 0.060
av= 0.04
f= 30.00 degrees = 0.524 radians
l= 3.58 degrees = 0.062 radians
β= 0.00 0.000 radians
d= 20.00 degrees = 0.349 radians
a= 4.05 degrees = 0.071 radians
Ca = 0.9330 x 0.380538 x cos d
= 0.335
1.5 Wind Load
Wind speed = 44 m/s
(The wind load with 44 m/sec without live load on the superstructure is critical. Hence the same has been considered).
1.6 Seismic Load

Seismic Zone = II
Zone Factor = 0.10

Importance Factor = 1.20 (IRC:6-2014, Cl: 219.5.1.1)
Response Reduction factor = 2.5
Type of founding strata = HS
"HS" for Hard soil & "MS" Medium soil and "SS" for Soft soil)
1.7 Material properties
Grade of Concrete = M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Design Constants:
( fck )
Charcteristic compresive strength of concrete = = 30 Mpa
Charcteristic strength of steel ( fy ) = = 500 Mpa
Tensile Strength of Concrete (fctm) = = 2.5 Mpa
Partial Safety Factor Material of Concrete gm = = 1.50
Partial Safety Factor Material of Steel gs = = 1.15
modular ratio m = = 6.45
Modulus Elastocity of concrete Ec = = 31000 Mpa
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel Es = = 200000 Mpa
Ultimate Compressive Strain in Concrete єcu3 = = 0.0035
Ultimate Tensile Strain in Steel єs = fy / (gs * Es) + 0.002 = 0.00417
a = 0.67 A2.10 Page : 244 (IRC:112-2011)

0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-
l = 0.80 60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-
h = 1.00 60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
xu, max / d = 0.46
fywd = 347.83
Rulim = 4.01
fcd = a * fck / gm = 13.40 Mpa
Fav = h * fcd * l = 10.72 Mpa
b = l/2 = 0.40
Limiting Neutral Axis Depth x lim = (d * єcu3) / (єs + єcu3) = 0.456 * d

acw = 1.0
v1 = 0.6
Page 3
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING & DOCUMENT NO. DATE
STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM
PROJECT:
GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT.
CS RCB
1.8 Load Calculations
1.8.1 DL Calculations
1.8.1.1 Deck Dimensions:

Overall Span of Superstructure (c/c of Exp. Joint) = 20.000 m ; Effective span (c/c of bearing) = 19.000 m
Projection of deck slab beyond c/l of bearing = 0.500 m
Carriageway width = 12.000 m ; Overall width of deck = 12.000 m
Thickness of Deck slab = 0.225 m ; Wearing coat thickness = 0.065 m
Skew Angle = 0.000 deg
1.8.1.2 Longitudinal Girders:-

No. of Longitudinal Girders = 4
c/c distance between Long. Girders = 3.000 m ; Length of cantilever slab from c/l of outer girder = 1.500 m
Depth of superstructure (including Slab) = 1.900 m ; Height of girders = 1.675 m
Length of support soild portion beyond c/l of bearing = 0.500 m ; Length of support solid portion inside c/l of bearing = 1.500 m
Length of tapering portion = 2.000 m ; Length of mid span portion = 12.000 m
Top Rectangular Flange Width = 1.000 m ; Top Rectangular Flange Thickness = 0.150 m
Top Traingular Flange Thickness at Mid Span = 0.075 m ; Top Traingular Flange Thickness at Support = 0.042 m
Bottom Rectangular Flange Width = 0.625 m ; Bottom Rectangular Flange Thickness (Bulb) = 0.250 m
Bottom Traingular Flange Thickness at Mid Span (Bulb) = 0.150 m ; Bottom Traingular Flange Thickness at Support = 0.150 m
Thickness of girders at mid span = 0.325 m ; Thickness of girders at support = 0.625 m
1.8.1.3 Cross Girders:

No. of End cross girders = 2 ; No. of Intermediate cross girders = 1
Thickness of cross girders = 0.400 m ; Thickness of cross girders = 0.300 m
Depth of X-girder = 1.425 m ; Depth of X-girder = 1.275 m
1.8.1.4 Material properties:

Unit weight of PSC = 25.00 KN/m^3
Page # 4
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
1.8.1.5 Outer Girder at Support: Outer Girder at Mid span:
1.1875 0.625 1.1875 1.3375 0.325 1.3375
0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225

0.150 0.150
0.000 0.042 0.000 0.225 0.075
0.188 0.338
1.675 1.675
0.150
0.250
0.625
Section Width Height A SA Section Width Height A SA

(m) (m) m2 (m) (m) (m^2)
Deck Salb R 3.000 0.225 0.6750 Deck Salb R 3.000 0.225 0.6750
Haunch R 0.188 0.150 0.0563 Haunch R 0.338 0.150 0.1013
Haunch T 0.188 0.042 0.0078 1.7859 Haunch T 0.338 0.075 0.0253
Web R 0.625 1.675 1.0469 Web R 0.325 1.675 0.5444 1.4434
Polystrene block R 1.000 0.000 0.0000 Bottom Bulb R 0.150 0.250 0.0750
Bottom Bulb T 0.150 0.150 0.0225
Polystrene block R 1.000 0.000 0.0000
1.8.1.6 Inner Girder at Support:
Inner Girder at Mid span:
1.1875 0.625 1.1875 1.3375 0.325 1.3375
0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225

0.150 0.150
0.000 0.042 0.000 0.225 0.075
0.188 0.338
1.675 1.675
0.150
0.250
0.625
Section Width Height A SA Section Width Height A SA

mm mm m^2 mm mm m^2
Deck Slab R 3.000 0.225 0.6750 Deck Slab R 3.000 0.225 0.6750
Haunch R 0.188 0.150 0.0563 Haunch R 0.338 0.150 0.1013
Haunch T 0.188 0.042 0.0078 1.7859 Haunch T 0.338 0.075 0.0253
Web R 0.625 1.675 1.0469 Web R 0.325 1.675 0.5444 1.4434
Polystrene block R 1.000 0.000 0.0000 Bottom Bulb R 0.150 0.250 0.0750
Bottom Bulb T 0.150 0.150 0.0225
Polystrene block R 1.000 0.000 0.0000
Page # 5
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
1.8.1.7 CALCULATIONS OF DEAD LOAD REACTIONS:
Area of Outer Girder at Support = = 1.7859 m^2 ; Area of Outer Girder at Span = = 1.4434 m^2
Area of Inner Girder at Support = = 1.7859 m^2 ; Area of Inner Girder at Span = = 1.4434 m^2
Depth of L-Girder = = 1.675 m ; Depth of X-Girder = = 1.425 m
Thick. of Intermediate X-Girder = = 0.300 m ; Thickness of End X-Girder = = 0.400 m
Self weight of Outer Girder at Span = 1.4434*25 = 36.10 KN/m ; Self weight of Inner Girder at Span = 1.4434*25 = 36.10 KN/m
C/L of Exp. Jt. C/L of Brg.
0.000 0.500 1.500 m 2.000 m

Outer Gird Inner Gird
Wt due to extra widening (uni) = (1.7859 - 1.4434)*25 = 8.60 8.60 KN/m
Wt due to extra widening (vary) = = 8.6 to 0 8.6 to 0 KN/m
Wt of Int. X-Girder on Outer Girder = (1-0.325 )/2*1.425*0.3*25 = 3.70 7.40 KN

Wt of End X-Girder on Outer Girder = (1-0.625)/2*1.425*0.4*25 = 2.70 5.40 KN
Outer Girder Inner Girder
2.70 KN 0.0 KN 3.70 KN 0.0 KN 2.70 KN 5.40 KN 0.0 KN 7.40 KN 0.0 KN 5.40 KN
4.750 m 4.750 m 4.750 m 4.750 m 4.750 m 4.750 m 4.750 m 4.750 m
8.60 36.10 KN/m 8.60 8.60 36.10 KN/m 8.60
R1 1.500 m 2.00 m R2 R1 1.500 m 2.00 m R2
0.500 m 19.000 m 0.500 m 0.500 m 19.000 m 0.500 m
Support Reaction R1 = 391.35 KN Support Reaction R1 = 395.90 KN
Add. Reaction due to long. cant.slab thickening = = 18.5625 KN

Wt of in-situ end cross girder = = 101.53125 KN
Wt of in-situ intermediate cross girder = = 32.06 KN
DL reaction from Superstructure = 782.7 + 791.80 = 1574.5 KN
Total DL reaction from Superstructure = 1727.00 KN Say 1800 KN
Page # 6
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR

"WIDENING & STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA
KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT AND ABUTMENT FOUNDATION FOR DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE:
A1 CS RCB
1.9 SIDL Loads:
Effective Span (LHS) = 19.00 m ;

Unit weight of RCC = 25.00 KN/m^3 ;
Total width of deck slab = 12.00
1.9.1 Weight of Footpath:
Width of Footpath = = 0.000 m

Avg. Height of raised Footpath = = 0.000 m
Weight of Footpath = 0 x 0 x 25 = 0.000 KN/m
1.9.2 Weight of Raised Kerb
Width of Kerb = = 0.000 m

Height of Kerb = = 0.250 m
Weight of Kerb = 0 x 0.25 x 25 = 0.000 KN/m
Weight of Raised Kerb = 0+0 = 0.000 KN/m
1.9.3 Weight of RCC Crash barrier on Left side
Volume of C/Barrier = = 0.282 m^3

Weight of RCC Crash barrier = 0.282 x 25 = 7.050 KN/m
Wt of pipe on c/barrier / m = = 0.036 KN/m
Weight of RCC Crash barrier+Pipe = 7.05 + 0.036 = 7.10 KN/m

Say 8.00 KN/m
1.9.4 Weight of RCC Crash barrier on Right side
Volume of C/Barrier = = 0.282 m^3

Weight of RCC Crash barrier = 0.282 x 25 = 7.050 KN/m
Wt of pipe on c/barrier / m = = 0.036 KN/m
Weight of RCC Crash barrier+Pipe = 7.05 + 0.036 = 7.10 KN/m

Say 8.00 KN/m
2.2.5 Footpath Live Load:
As per IRC: 6-2000, Clause 209.4

Intensity of FPLL P = P1 (for effective span <= 7.5m)
P' - (40 x L - 300) / 9 (for effective span > 7.5m and < 30.0m)
= (P' - 260 + 4800 / L) x (16.5 - W) /(for
15 effective span > 30m)
P' = = 500.00 kg/m^2
Intensity of FPLL for LHS Span = = 448.90 kg/m^2
Footpath Live Load = 4.489 x 0 = 0.000 KN/m
Intensity of FPLL for RHS Span = = 500.00 kg/m^2

Footpath Live Load = 5x0 = 0.000 KN/m
1.9.5 Transverse Eccentricity of SIDL

Description of Load Load Length Total Ecc. wrt to Total Total Net Ecc of
Recation centre Trans Recation Reaction
(KN/m) (m) (KN) (m) Moment on Abut (m)
(KNm) (KN)
C/Barrier Load on Median side 8.00 10.00 80.00 -6.000 -480.00
C/Barrier Load on Outer side 8.00 10.00 80.00 6.000 480.00 240.00
Railling Load on Footpath side 8.00 10.00 80.00 3.750 300.00 0.688
Wearing Coat Load on Outer side 11.55 10.00 115.50 -2.875 -332.06
242.00
Wearing Coat Load on Median side 12.65 10.00 126.50 2.875 363.69
Page 7
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY
PROJECT:
(HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT.
CS RCB
2.0 Load Calculations:
0.000 4.980 0.400

c/L of brg. FRL 291.120
0.00
11a
2.411 1 1.420 Soffit Lvl 289.005
10a Cap Top 288.709
11b0.300 4.980 2 0.500
0.00 10b HFL 287.800
3
0.300 5.200 Cap Bottom 288.109
0.220 1.200 0.000
10c 4
0.500
5.178 1.222 HFL 287.800
5
10d
4.871 1.529 MSL 283.460
10e 6
4.800 0.000 1.600 0.000 Shaft Bottom 282.460

1.500 10f 7 8 1.500 0.000
9
2.000 2.000 MSL 283.46
10f' 7'7 8' 9' 1.50
280.960
7" 8" 9"
0.500 0.500 280.460
4.800 1.600 4.000

10.400
HEEL SHAFT TOE

c/L of Shaft
c/L of Base
SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF ABUTMENT
10.40
0 SQ
T T'
SQ L' 0.00 SK
12.000
00
00
L L
12.0
12.0
L'
0
0.00
T' T
10.400 SK
PLAN OF ABUTMENT
Page 8
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
2.1 Sectional Properties of Footing Base
Skew Angle = 0.00 Deg = 0.00 radians
Length of abutment = 12.000 m (Perpendicular to traffic direction)

Width of abutment = 10.400 m (Perpendicular to skew direction)
Length of abutment = 12.000 m (Parallel to skew direction)

Width of abutment = 10.400 m (Parallel to traffic direction)
Width of traingle = 0.000 m

Width of rectangle = 12.000 m
Area of footing A = 10.40 x 12.000 = 124.80 m^2
Calculation of Section Modulus ZL
M.I of rectangle = 12.000 x 10.400 ^ 3 / 12 = 1124.86 m^4
M.I of traingle about c.g of traingle = 0.000 x 10.400 ^ 3 / 36 = 0.00 m^4

Area of traingle = 0.000 x 10.400 / 2 = 0.00 m^2
Dist. of c.g of traingle from c.g of
rectangle = 5.200 - 3.467 = 1.73 m
M.I of traingle about c.g of rectangle = 0.000 + 0.000 x 1.73 ^2 = 0.00 m^4
M.I of footing along L-L axis = 1124.9 + 0.000 x 2 = 1124.86 m^4
Section Modulus ZL = 1124.864 / 5.200 = 216.32 m^3
Calculation of Section Modulus Zt
M.I of rectangle = 10.400 x 12.000 ^ 3 / 12 = 1497.60 m^4
M.I of triangle about c.g of triangle = 10.400 x 0.000 ^ 3 / 36 = 0.00 m^4

Area of triangle = 10.400 x 0.000 / 2 = 0.00 m^2
Dist. of c.g of triangle from c.g of centre = 6.000 + 0.000 = 6.00 m
M.I of triangle about c.g of rectangle = 0.00 + 0.000 x 6.00 ^2 = 0.00 m^4
M.I of footing along T-T axis = 1497.60 + 0.00 x 2 = 1497.60 m^4
Section Modulus ZT = 1497.60 / 6.000 = 249.60 m^3
2.2 Concrete Components
Component Length Depth/ Area Nos Width Volume Eccentricity Eccentricity eL Ecc., eL
Height eL @ C/L @ C/L abut @ toe
base shaft (m)
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3) (m) (m)
1 0.400 2.411 0.964 1 12.000 11.573 -0.020 -0.420 -5.220

2 1.420 0.300 0.426 1 12.000 5.112 0.490 0.090 -4.710
3 1.310 0.300 0.393 1 12.000 4.716 0.490 0.090 -4.710
4 1.211 0.309 0.374 1 12.000 4.490 0.595 0.195 -4.605
5 1.376 4.340 5.970 1 12.000 71.638 0.509 0.109 -4.691
6 1.565 1.000 1.565 1 12.000 18.775 0.418 0.018 -4.782
7 0.000 1 12.000 0.000 -0.400 -0.800
8 1.600 0.000 0.000 1 12.000 0.000 0.400 0.000
9 0.000 1 12.000 0.000 5.200 4.800 0.000
10a 4.980 2.711 13.501 1 0.550 7.426 -2.710 -3.110 -7.910
10b 5.090 0.300 1.527 1 0.550 0.840 -2.655 -3.055 -7.855
10c 5.189 0.309 1.603 1 0.550 0.882 -2.605 -3.005 -7.805
10d 5.024 4.340 21.806 1 0.550 11.993 -2.687 -3.087 -7.887
10e 4.835 1.000 4.835 1 0.550 2.660 -2.782 -3.182 -7.982
10f 4.800 0.000 0.000 1 0.550 0.000 -0.400 -0.800 -5.600
Page 9
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
11a 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.500 0.000 -5.200 -5.600 -10.400

11b 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.500 0.000 -5.200 -5.600 -10.400
7' 3.600 1 12.000 43.200 -2.000 -2.400
8' 1.600 1.500 2.400 1 12.000 28.800 0.400 0.000
9' 3.000 1 12.000 36.000 2.533 2.133 -2.667
7" 4.800 0.500 2.400 1 12.000 28.800 -2.800 -3.200
8" 1.600 0.500 0.800 1 12.000 9.600 0.400 0.000
9" 4.000 0.500 2.000 1 12.000 24.000 3.200 2.800 -2.000
10f' 4.800 0.750 3.600 1 0.550 1.980 -3.600 -4.000
2.3 Backfill Components
Components Area Width Volume Eccentricity

eL @
base
(m^2) (m) (m^3) (m)
Above HFL 16.631 12.000 199.574 -2.695

Below HFL 30.242 12.000 362.899 -2.811
Above MSL 38.437 12.000 461.249 -2.690
Below MSL 8.435 12.000 101.225 -3.131
2.4 Frontfill Components:
Eccentricity Eccentricity Eccentricity eL Eccentrici

ty eL @
Area Width Volume eL @ eL @ @
Components toe
(m^2) (m) (m^3) base abut shaft toe tip juncti.
(m) (m) (m) (m)
LWL Condition 9.000 12.000 108.000 3.422 3.022 -1.778 2.222
HFL Condition 7.000 12.000 84.000 3.486 3.086 -1.714 2.286
2.5 Calculation of Vertical loads and Moments at critical section for shear in Toe slab:
2.5.1 LWL condition:
Components Area Length Volume Ecc., eL @ Vertical Moment

Toe critical Load
section P
(m^2) (m) (m^3) (m) (KN) (KN-m)
Frontfill 5.445 12.000 65.345 0.992 1306.91 1295.86

Due to Toe slab 1.861 12.000 22.330 0.891 558.243 497.386
1865.149 1793.244
Combination 1: Load Factor for Back fill = 1.350
case-1 Normal Case : SR - EP 2517.951 2420.879
case-2 Normal Case : SR - CWLL 2517.951 2420.879
case-3 Normal Case : SD - EP 2517.951 2420.879
Comb-1 case-4 Wind Case : SR - Wind 2517.951 2420.879
case-5 Wind Case : SR - CWLL 2517.951 2420.879
design of foundation
case-6 Wind Case : SR - EP 2517.951 2420.879

case-7 Wind Case : SD - EP 2517.951 2420.879
Comb-3 case-15 Seismic Case 2517.951 2420.879
Page 10
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
2.5.2 HFL condition:
Components Area (m^2) Length (m) Volume (m^3) Ecc., eL @ Vertical Moment
Toe critical Load (KN-m)
section (m) P
Frontfill 4.402 12.000 52.820 1.108 (KN)
528.20 585.42
Due to Toe slab 1.861 12.000 22.330 0.891 334.95 298.431


Comb-3 case-15 Seismic Case 1165.251 1193.205
2.6 Calculation of Vertical loads and Moments at face of stem wall in Heel slab:
Component Length Depth Area Length Volume Vertical Load Ecc., eL @ Moment @
(Average) P Heel critical critical Section
(KN) section (KNm)
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3) (m)
10a' 4.800 2.711 13.013 12.000 156.154 3123.08 2.400 7495.40

10b' 4.800 0.300 1.440 12.000 17.280 345.60 2.400 829.44
10c' 4.800 0.309 1.483 12.000 17.798 355.97 2.400 854.33
10d' 4.800 4.340 20.832 12.000 249.984 4999.69 2.400 11999.26
10e' 4.800 1.000 4.800 12.000 57.600 1152.00 2.400 2764.80
10f 4.800 0.000 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00
10f' 4.800 0.750 3.600 12.000 43.200 864.00 3.200 2764.80
7 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00
7' 3.600 12.000 43.200 1080.00 1.600 1728.00
7" 2.400 12.000 28.800 720.00 2.400 1728.00
For Seismic 542.016 0.00 2.400 0.00
Total For Normal Case 12640.34 30164.03
For Seismic Case 12640.34 30164.03
case-1 Normal Case : SR - EP 17064 40721

case-2 Normal Case : SR - CWLL 17064 40721
case-3 Normal Case : SD - EP 17064 40721
Comb-1 case-4 Wind Case : SR - Wind 17064 40721
case-5 Wind Case : SR - CWLL 17064 40721
case-6 Wind Case : SR - EP 17064 40721

case-7 Wind Case : SD - EP 17064 40721
Comb-3 case-15 Seismic Case 17064 40721
Page 11
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
(KN) section (KNm)
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3) (m)
10a' 4.800 2.711 13.013 12.000 156.154 3123.08 2.400 7495.40

10b' 4.800 0.300 1.440 12.000 17.280 345.60 2.400 829.44
10c' 4.800 0.309 1.483 12.000 17.798 355.97 2.400 854.33
10d' 4.800 4.340 20.832 12.000 249.984 2499.85 2.400 5999.64
10e' 4.800 1.000 4.800 12.000 57.600 576.00 2.400 1382.40
10f 4.800 0.000 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00
10f' 4.800 0.750 3.600 12.000 43.200 432.00 3.200 1382.40
7 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00
7' 3.600 12.000 43.200 648.00 1.600 1036.80
7" 2.400 12.000 28.800 432.00 2.400 1036.80
For Seismic 441.216 0.00 2.400 0.00


2.7 Calculation of Vertical loads and Moments at critical section for shear in Heel slab:
(KN) section (KNm)
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3) (m)
10a' 4.800 2.711 13.013 12.000 156.154 3123.08 2.400 7495.40

10b' 4.800 0.300 1.440 12.000 17.280 345.60 2.400 829.44
10c' 4.800 0.309 1.483 12.000 17.798 355.97 2.400 854.33
10d' 4.800 4.340 20.832 12.000 249.984 4999.69 2.400 11999.26
10e' 4.800 1.000 4.800 12.000 57.600 1152.00 2.400 2764.80
10f 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 2.400 0.00
10f' 3.600 12.000 43.200 864.00 3.200 2764.80
7 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00
7' 3.600 12.000 43.200 1080.00 1.600 1728.00
7" 4.800 0.500 2.400 12.000 28.800 720.00 2.400 1728.00
For Seismic 441.216 0.00 2.400 0.00
Page 12
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB


(KN) section (KNm)
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3) (m)
10a' 4.800 2.711 13.013 12.000 156.154 3123.08 2.400 7495.40

10b' 4.800 0.300 1.440 12.000 17.280 345.60 2.400 829.44
10c' 4.800 0.309 1.483 12.000 17.798 355.97 2.400 854.33
10d' 4.800 4.340 20.832 12.000 249.984 2499.85 2.400 5999.64
10e' 4.800 1.000 4.800 12.000 57.600 576.00 2.400 1382.40
10f 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 2.400 0.00
10f' 3.600 12.000 43.200 432.00 3.200 1382.40
7 0.000 12.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00
7' 3.600 12.000 43.200 648.00 1.600 1036.80
7" 4.800 0.500 2.400 12.000 28.800 432.00 2.400 1036.80
For Seismic 441.216 0.00 2.400 0.00


Page 13
ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF (R&B) DOCUMENT NO. DATE

PROJECT: State Roads & CRN, Roads and Building Department
Government of Telangana. R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23

TITLE:
A1 CS RCB
3.0 Carriageway Live Load Reactions and Moments:
3.1 Maximum Reaction Case
Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 20.000 m

Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.500 m
Span (C/C of Bearing) = 19.00 m
To find the maximum reaction, the train of loads are placed in such a way that the starting load is placed at the centre line of
expansion joint over abutment.
500 500
CL of Bridge
5500
12000
Carriageway configuration of 3-lane bridge
3.1.1 Class 70R Wheeled Vehicle:
1000.00
5.124 14.376
R1 R2
19.00
0.500
R1 = 1000 x 14.376 / 19 = 756.64 KN

R2 = 1000 - 756.64 = 243.36 KN
Max Reaction on abutment = = 756.64 KN

Min Reaction on abutment = = 243.36 KN
Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 1000 = 200.00 KN
500 500
CL of Bridge CG of 70RW
2905 2595
12000
Transverse Eccentricity = 6 - 0.5 - 2.595 = 2.905 m

Transverse Moment = 756.64 * 2.905 = 2198.04 KNm
Page 14


TITLE:
A1 CS RCB
3.1.2 1 Lane Class A:

500.00
5.714 13.786
R1 R2
19.00
0.500
R1 = 500 x 13.786 / 19 = 362.79 KN

R2 = 500 - 362.79 = 137.21 KN
Max Reaction on abut = = 362.79 KN

Min Reaction on abut = = 137.21 KN
Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 500 = 100.00 KN
500 500
CL of Bridge CG of 1 LCA
4200 1300
12000

For Class A 2 Lane the loads & the moments shall get multiplied by 2 times that of Class A 1 Lane.
R1 = 2 x 362.79 = 725.58 KN
R2 = 2 x 137.21 = 274.42 KN

Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 500 x 2 = 200.00 KN
500 500
2450 3050
12000

Page 15


TITLE:
A1 CS RCB
For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 0.9 times that of 3L Class A.
R1 = 0.9 x 3 x 362.79 = 979.53 KN

R2 = 0.9 x 3 x 137.21 = 370.47 KN

Braking Force for RHS = 0.9 x (0.2 x 500x2+0.05 x 500) = 202.50 KN
500 500
700 4800
12000

3.1.5 Class A + 70RW :
For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 1 times that of (70RW + 1 Class A)
R1 = 0.9 x (756.64 + 362.79 ) = 1007.49 KN

R2 = (243.36 + 137.21 ) = 342.51 KN

Braking Force for RHS = 0.9 x (0.2 * 1000 + 0.05 * 500) = 202.50 KN
CG of 70RW
500 4895 500
605 4200 1300
12000
Transverse Eccentricity for 1CLA = = 4.200 m

Transverse Eccentricity for70RW = = 0.605 m
Transverse Moment = 362.79 * 4.2 + 756.64 * 0.605 = 1981.49 KNm
Page 16


TITLE:
A1 CS RCB
3.2 Summary of Loads and Moments for Maximum Load case:
Details of Load Cases Max Min Load on Braking Transvers Trasvers

Vertical Vertical Span Force e Moment e Ecc.
Reaction Reaction
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN) (KN) (m)
Case 1 : 70 RW 756.6 243.4 1000.0 200.0 2198.0 2.9
Case 2 : 1 LCA 362.8 137.2 500.0 100.0 1523.7 4.2
Case 3 : 2 LCA 725.6 274.4 1000.0 200.0 1777.7 2.5
Case 4 : 3 LCA 979.5 370.5 1350.0 202.5 685.7 0.7
Case 5 : Class A + 70RW 1007.5 342.5 1350.0 202.5 1981.5 1.8
Page 17
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
(HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 18.04.23
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201
21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT.
CS RCB
4.0 Calculation of Horizontal force:
DL Reaction at free end (Max) = (Increased by 5%) = 1890.00 KN

DL Reaction at free end (Min) = (Decreased by 5%) = 1710.00 KN
SIDL Reaction at free end = = 482.00 KN
4.1 Horizontal Force due to Tar paper bearing
Horizontal force at bearing level in the case of tar paper bearings will be calculated as per cl. 214.5.1.3 of IRC :6-2000
Force at each end = Max of (Fh / 2, m Rg)

where m = Coefficient of friction between concrete & concrete surfaces with tar paper in between
= 0.5
4.1 Horizontal Force due to elastomeric bearing
Horizontal force at bearing level in the case of elastomeric bearings will be calculated as per cl. 211.5.1.4 of IRC :6-2014
Horizontal Force for Elastomeric bearing = Fh / 2 + Vr ltc

where Fh = Braking Force in KN
Vrtc = Force due to elastomeric bearing property
Shrinkage strain = 0.0002

Creep Strain = 0
Coefficient of expansion = 1.17E-05
o
Temperature variation = 55 C
Temperature strain = 1.17E-05 x 55 = 0.000644
Total strain = 0.0002 + 0.000 + 0.000644 = 0.000844

Design strain = = 0.000844
Total change in legnth due to longitudinal strain = 0.000844 x 19000 = 16.03 mm

Change in length per support = 16.03 / 2 = 8.02 mm
Design change in length = 8.02 x 1.1 = 8.822 mm

(Refer Clause 211.5.1.4 of IRC:6-2010)
Shear strain = 8.822 / 96 = 0.1
Shear modulus of bearing = 1.2 N/mm^2
Shear stress = 0.1 x 1.2 = 0.12 N/mm^2
Force induced due to temp & shrink = 400 x 500 x 0.12 = 24000 N
Total HF due to temp & shrinkage = 5 x 24000 / 1000 = 120 KN
4.2 Centrifugal Force (CF):
Centrifugal force = W x v^2 / (127 x R)

where W = Weight of moving vehicle in KN
v = Speed of vehicle in kmph
R = Radius of curvature of superstructure in m = 900 m
Speed of the vehicle = (127 x R x (e+0.15))^0.5

where e = Superelevation = 0.025
Speed of the vehicle = (127 x R x (e+0.15))^0.5 = 141.43 Kmph

Design speed for the project = = 100.00 Kmph
Adopted speed = = 100.00 Kmph
Centrifugal force = W x v^2 / (127 x R) = 0.087 W
Acting @ from Formational Lvl = 1.20 m
4.3 Summary of Horizontal Forces due to Elastomer Bearing
Details of Load Cases Max Load on Braking Reaction Centrif Trasvers Trasverse Horizon Horizonta Horizo
Vertical Span Force at free ugal e Ecc. Moment tal l Force ntalFor
Reaction end Force Force (Wind) ce
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN) (m) (KNm) (Norma KN (Seismi
Case 1 : 70 RW 756.64 1000.00 200.00 243.36 (KN)
43.74 2.905 l) KN
2198.040 220.00 120.0 c) KN
140.00
Case 2 : 1 LCA 362.79 500.00 100.00 137.21 21.87 4.200 1523.720 170.00 120.0 130.00
Case 3 : 2 LCA 725.58 1000.00 200.00 274.42 43.74 2.450 1777.680 220.00 120.0 140.00
Case 4 : 3 LCA 979.53 1350.00 202.50 370.47 59.06 0.700 685.680 221.25 120.0 140.25
Case 5 : Class A + 70RW 1007.49 1350.00 202.50 342.51 59.06 1.771 1981.485 221.25 120.0 140.25
120.00
120.00
Page 18
State Roads & CRN, Roads and Building
Department
PROJECT: STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
(HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO
CS RCB
5.0 Forces and Moments due to Longitudinal Seismic Case
As per Clause 219.1.1 IRC: 6-2010, for seismic force calculation, no calculation of seismic force is required for
structures in Zone -II & Zone -III, if the two conditions stated below are satisfied simultaneously.
i) The span is less than 15 meter.

ii) The total length of the bridge is less than 60 meter.
Zone =
Span Length = > 15
Total Length = > 60
Hence the bridge is to be designed for Seismic Forces.
As per clause 219.3 of IRC 6:2014, Since the bridge is not in the Zone-IV or Zone -V, no vertical
component of the seismic force is required to be considered in the design But to be considered for the
stability checks.
AV = x Ah (For design)
Horizontal seismic force Feq = (Refer Cl. 219.5.1 of IRC:6-2014)
Where Feq =
D.L =
L.L =
b =
= (when the seismic force is acting perpendicular to traffic)
= (when the seismic force is acting parallel to traffic)
Ah = Zone factor
= II 0.10
III 0.16
Z = = 0.10 IV 0.24
I = V 0.36
= Critical Bridge
= Important Bridge
= Other Bridge Foundation Notation
R = Strata
= Rock/Hard Soil HS
Medium Soil MS
Soil Condition at founding Level HS Soft Soil SS
Dist. of top of Abutment cap where 1mm deflection is required L = 6.249 m
Grade of Concrete = M 30
Size of Abutment = 12.00 x 1.60 m
Youngs Modulus = = 31000000 KN/m^2

Moment of Inertia = = 4.10 m^4
State Roads & CRN, Roads and Building
Department
PROJECT: STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
F req. to produce 1mm 'd' at top of Abutment = 3 * E * I / L^3 = 1561030 KN/m

= = 1561.03 KN/mm
Fundamental time period = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5

where = D1 + D2
= DL from the superstructure = 2372.00 KN
= Live Load = 1007.49 KN
= = 0.0931 sec
=
Avg. Response Acceleration Coeff. for 5% damping 1.00 / T = 2.500
For Rock = 2.5 (0.00 <= T <= 0.40)
= 1.00/T (0.40 <= T <= 4.00)
Taking = 2.500
Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = (0.1/ 2 ) x 2.5 / (2.5 / 1.2) = 0.060
Vertical Seismic Coefficient For design = 2/3 Ah or 0 = 0.000

(Refer Clause 222.3 of IRC:6)
283.960
Part of abutment and other components embedded below m shall
Ground Levelnot
i.e. be
RL considered to produce any Seismic Force
Volume of Abutment Shaft = 1.529 x 12.0 x 4.649

3
= 85.3 m
Volume of Solid return wall above Flooring = 2.000 x 4.8 x 0.550 x 7.660
3
= 40.445 m
Volume of footing = 1.600 x 12.0 x 0.00

3
= 0.00 m
Vertical Seismic Coefficient For Stability = 2/3 Ah = 0.040
5.1 Computation of Longitudinal Seismic Force
RL of Shaft base = 282.460 m

RL of Founding level = 280.460 m
Component Volu Horizont RL of Moment Mome Vertical Longitudi Mvsbase Longitu Mvstoe
me al force of @ base nt @ compo nal VS x eL dinal VS x etoe
compon action of MHB Shat nent of Eccentrici Eccentri
ent of V HS base V ty city @
HS (KNm) MHS VS @ base (KNm) Toe (KNm)
(m^3 (KN) (m) (KN) eL etoe
) (KNm) (m) (m)
DL Reaction 113.40 290.17 1101.11 874.3 37.80 0.700 26.46 -4.500 -170.10
SIDL Reaction 28.92 291.12 308.29 250.4 9.64 0.700 6.75 -4.500 -43.38
SIDL Over Returns 2.42 291.12 25.81 21.0 1.61 -2.510 -4.05 -7.710 -12.44
Solid Return wall 40.44 12.13 287.29 82.87 58.60 8.09 -2.690 -21.76 -7.890 -63.82
Cantilever Return wall 0.00 0.00 290.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.200 0.00 -10.400 0.00
Dirt Wall 11.57 17.36 289.91 164.12 129.40 11.57 -0.020 -0.23 -5.220 -60.41
Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 5.11 7.67 288.56 62.10 46.77 5.11 0.490 2.50 -4.710 -24.08
Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.72 7.07 288.26 55.17 41.02 4.72 0.490 2.31 -4.710 -22.21
Soil over the heel : Above MSL 0.00 0.00 287.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2.690 0.00 -7.890 0.00
Soil over the heel : Below MSL 0.00 0.00 282.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3.131 0.00 -8.331 0.00
Abutment Shaft above LBL 85.31 127.97 285.78 681.35 425.42 85.31 0.514 43.88 -4.686 -399.73
Footing above LBL 0.00 0.00 282.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
SUM : Service Condition 317 2481 1847 164 56 -796
SUM : Span Dislodged Condition 175 1071 722 116 23 -583
STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR &
GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
DISTRICT.
CS RCB
6.0 Forces and Moments due to Wind Force
Left Span
C/C distance between Exp. Jt. = 20.000 m
Dist. between C/L's of Brg. & Exp. Jt. = 0.500 m
C/C distance between Bearing = 19.000 m
FRL (At Median inner edge) = 291.120 m

Camber = 2.500 %
Thickness of Wearing Course = 0.065 m
Depth of Superstructure = 1.900 m
Soffit Level at Outer Girder/Bearing = 289.005 m
HFL = 218.800 m
LBL = 283.960 m
Depth of Footing = 2.000 m
Founding Level = 280.460 m
Angle of Skew q = 0.00 Degrees Cos q Sin q Tan q

1.000 0.000 0.000
Type of super structure = RCC Solid Slab
Height of Crash barrier = 1.00 m
Wind velocities & Pressures (Refer Table 5: of IRC:6)
Basic speed Height Velocity Pressure DL LL

Pz x G x C D
(m/s) H (m) V (m/s) Pz (N/m2) G= 2 2
33 10.00 27.80 463.70 1808.43 CD = 1.95 1.2
44 10.00 37.07 824.36 3214.99
Wind Loads on super structure

LHS RHS
width of the deck = 12.00 0.00
Lift co-effiecent (CL) = 0.75 0
6.0.1 Wind Force on exposed area of the superstructure (Normal to the wind dir) (Refer clause 209.3.5)
Exposed area of superstructure = ( Area of Deck with C/Barrier )

= ((20 x (1.9 + 0.065 + 1) )/2) = 29.65 m^2
Wind Force for the above area = = 95324.35 N

= 95.32 KN
Depth of Superstructure + C/Barrier = = 2.965 m

Acting @ from Founding Level = = 10.03 m
Wind force perpendicular to abutment axis = 95.324 x sin 0 + 95.324 x 0.25x 1 = 23.83 KN
Wind force parallel to the abutment axis = 95.324 x cos 0 + 95.324 x 0.25x 0 = 95.32 KN
Plan area for the vertical load = (20X12)/2 = 120 m^2
Wind vertical load = = 148384.00 N/m^2
= = 148.38 KN
Page 21
PROJECT: GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR &
GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
DISTRICT.
CS RCB
6.0.2 Wind Force on the Live Load (normal to the wind direction)
Wind load on live load = No Live Load is considered (Refer clause 209.3.7 of IRC:6- 2014)
= 0 x 3 x 824.355 x 2 x 1.2/1000 = 0.000 KN
Acting at @ from Founding Level = = 12.16 m
Wind force perpendicular to abutment axis = 0 x sin 0+ 0 x 0.25x 1 = 0.00 KN

Wind force parallel to the abutment axis = 0 x cos 0+ 0 x 0.25x 0 = 0.00 KN
6.1 Wind Loads on sub structure

For abutcap For abut
Shape = Rectangular Rectangular
Width (b) = 1.42 1.60 for skew multiply divide by coso
Depth (t) = 12 12
t/b = 8.5 8
Height = 0.3 5.45
H/b = 0.211 3.406
CD = 0.800 0.800 (from Table 5, IRC 6-2014)
Gust factor (G) = 2 2
6.2 Service Condition
6.2.1 Wind force on the sub structure
Exposed area of abutcap = 0.786

Wind load on abutcap = 1036.710 N
= 1.037 KN
Acting at from Founding Level = 7.941 m
Wind force perpendicular to abut. axis = 1.036 x sin 0 + 1.036 x 0.25x 1 = 0.26 KN
Wind force parallel to the abut. axis = 1.036 x cos 0 + 1.036 x 0.25x 0 = 1.04 KN
Load of exposed area of abutment for LWL case = 7371 N

= 7.37 KN
Acting at @ from Founding Level LWL case = 5.499 m
Wind force perpendicular to abut. axis = 7.371 x sin 0 + 7.371 x0.25x 1 = 1.84 KN
Wind force parallel to the abut. axis = 7.37 x cos 0 + 7.371 x0.25x 0 = 7.37 KN
Load of exposed area of abutment for HFL case = 494 N

= 0.49 KN
Acting at @ from Founding Level HFL case = 7.494 m
Wind force perpendicular to abut. axis = 0.494 x sin 0 + 0.494 x0.25x 1 = 0.12 KN
Wind force parallel to the abut. axis = 0.493 x cos 0 + 0.494 x0.25x 0 = 0.49 KN
Page 22
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING & STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT. R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
7.0 Normal Case with Maximum Load (LWL):
7.1 Vertical Loads and Moments
Volume g P eL ML eT MT eToe Mtoe

S. No. Item
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
1 Dead Load Reaction 1890.0 0.700 1323.0 0.00 0.0 -4.500 -8505.0
2 SIDL Reaction I 240.0 0.700 168.0 0.00 0.0 -4.500 -1080.0
3 SIDL Reaction II(surfacing) 242.0 0.700 169.4 0.00 0.0 -4.500 -1089.0
4 FPLL Reaction 105.8 0.700 74.0 0.00 0.00 -4.500 -475.9
CWLL Reaction - Normal 1007.49 0.700 705.2 1.77 1981.49 -4.500 -4533.7
5 CWLL Reaction - Wind 0.00 0.700 0.0 1.77 1981.49 -4.500 0.0
CWLL Reaction - Seismic 20% of LL 201.50 0.700 141.0 1.77 396.30 -4.500 -906.7
6 SIDL over Returns 7.50 KN/m 5.38 40.4 -2.510 -101.3 0.00 0.0 -7.710 -311.1
7 Dirt Wall 11.57 25.00 289.3 -0.020 -5.8 0.00 0.0 -5.220 -1510.3
8 Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 5.11 25.00 127.8 0.490 62.6 0.00 0.0 -4.710 -601.9
9 Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.72 25.00 117.9 0.490 57.8 0.00 0.0 -4.710 -555.3
10 Abutment Shaft upto MSL 76.13 25.00 1903.2 0.514 979.0 0.00 0.0 -4.686 -8917.7
11 Abutment Shaft below MSL 18.78 25.00 469.4 0.418 196.0 0.00 0.0 -4.782 -2244.8
12 Backfill upto MSL 461.25 20.00 9225.0 -2.690 -24818.7 0.00 0.0 -7.890 -72788.5
13 Backfill below MSL 101.22 20.00 2024.5 -3.131 -6339.2 0.00 0.0 -8.331 -16866.6
14 Front Fill 108.00 20.00 2160.0 3.422 7392.0 0.00 0.0 -1.778 -3840.0
15 Toe Slab upto MSL 0.00 25.00 0.0 5.200 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.000 0.0
16 Toe Slab below MSL 60.00 25.00 1500.0 2.800 4200.0 0.00 0.0 -2.400 -3600.0
17 Heel Slab upto MSL 0.00 25.00 0.0 -0.400 0.0 0.00 0.0 -5.600 0.0
18 Heel Slab below MSL 72.00 25.00 1800.0 -2.320 -4176.0 0.00 0.0 -7.520 -13536.0
19 Slab below shaft 38.40 25.00 960.0 0.400 384.0 0.00 0.0 -4.800 -4608.0
20 Cantilever Return Wall 0.00 25.00 0.0 -5.200 0.0 0.00 0.0 -10.400 0.0
21 Solid Return Wall (above LWL) 21.14 5.00 105.7 -2.690 -284.4 0.00 0.0 -7.890 -834.0
22 Solid Return Wall (below LWL) 4.64 5.00 23.2 -3.131 0.00 0.0 -8.331 -193.3
23 Vertical load due to seismic effect 163.85 55.86 -796.18
24 Wind force 148.38
Sample Calculations : As per IRC:6-2014

1890.00 x 0.95 + 240.00 x 0.95 + 242.00 x 1 + 105.75 x 0 + 1007.49 x 0 + 0.00 x - + 201.50 x - + 40.35 x 0.95 + 289.32 x 0.95 + 127.80 x 0.95 + 117.90 x 0.95 + 1903.20 x
Vertical
0.95 + 469.38 x 0.95 + 9224.97 x 0.95 + 2024.50 x 0.95 + 2160.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 1500.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 1800.00 x 0.95 + 960.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 +
load
105.70 x 0.95 + 23.20 x 0.95
Verification of 1323.00 x 0.95 + 168.00 x 0.95 + 169.40 x 1 + 74.03 x 0 + 705.24 x 0 + 0.00 x - + 141.05 x - + -101.28 x 0.95 + -5.79 x 0.95 + 62.62 x 0.95 + 57.77 x 0.95 + 978.99 x 0.95
Equlibrium Case 1 ML + 196.00 x 0.95 + -24818.69 x 0.95 + -6339.19 x 0.95 + 7392.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 4200.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + -4176.00 x 0.95 + 384.00 x 0.95 + -0.01 x 0.95 + -
(Table 3.1 IRC: 6 - 2014) 284.38 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95
0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 0 + 1981.49 x 0 + 1981.49 x - + 396.30 x - + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95
MT
+ 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95 + 0.00 x 0.95
Vertical 1890.00 x 1 + 240.00 x 1 + 242.00 x 1 + 105.75 x 0.75 + 1007.49 x 0.75 + 0.00 x - + 201.50 x - + 40.35 x 1 + 289.32 x 1 + 127.80 x 1 + 117.90 x 1 + 1903.20 x 1 + 469.38
load x 1 + 9224.97 x 1 + 2024.50 x 1 + 2160.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 1500.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 1800.00 x 1 + 960.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 105.70 x 1 + 23.20 x 1
Limit state of
1323.00 x 1 + 168.00 x 1 + 169.40 x 1 + 74.03 x 0.75 + 705.24 x 0.75 + 0.00 x - + 141.05 x - + -101.28 x 1 + -5.79 x 1 + 62.62 x 1 + 57.77 x 1 + 978.99 x 1 + 196.00 x 1 +
Servicebility Case 1 ML
-24818.69 x 1 + -6339.19 x 1 + 7392.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 4200.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + -4176.00 x 1 + 384.00 x 1 + -0.01 x 1 + -284.38 x 1 + 0.00 x 1
(Table 3.3 IRC: 6 - 2014)
0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 0.75 + 1981.49 x 0.75 + 1981.49 x - + 396.30 x - + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00
MT
x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1 + 0.00 x 1
1890.00 x 1.35 + 240.00 x 1.35 + 242.00 x 1.75 + 105.75 x 1.15 + 1007.49 x 1.15 + 0.00 x - + 201.50 x - + 40.35 x 1.35 + 289.32 x 1.35 + 127.80 x 1.35 + 117.90 x 1.35 +
Vertical
1903.20 x 1.35 + 469.38 x 1.35 + 9224.97 x 1.35 + 2024.50 x 1.35 + 2160.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 1500.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 1800.00 x 1.35 + 960.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x
load
1.35 + 105.70 x 1.35 + 23.20 x 1.35
1323.00 x 1.35 + 168.00 x 1.35 + 169.40 x 1.75 + 74.03 x 1.15 + 705.24 x 1.15 + 0.00 x - + 141.05 x - + -101.28 x 1.35 + -5.79 x 1.35 + 62.62 x 1.35 + 57.77 x 1.35 +
Design of Foundation
Case 1 ML 978.99 x 1.35 + 196.00 x 1.35 + -24818.69 x 1.35 + -6339.19 x 1.35 + 7392.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 4200.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + -4176.00 x 1.35 + 384.00 x 1.35 + -
(Table 3.4 IRC: 6 - 2014)
0.01 x 1.35 + -284.38 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35
0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.75 + 0.00 x 1.15 + 1981.49 x 1.15 + 1981.49 x - + 396.30 x - + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 +
MT
0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35 + 0.00 x 1.35
Basic Combination
Case 1 Normal Case : SR - EP - - 21974.5 - -19745.4 - 0.0 - -134081.8

verification of Equilibrium
Case 2 Normal Case : SR - CWLL

(Table 3.1 IRC: 6 - 2014)
- - 21974.5 - -19745.4 - 0.0 - -134081.8

Case 3 Normal Case : SD - EP - - 19709.0 - -21331.3 - 0.0 - -123887.1
Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - 22197.1 - -19745.4 - 0.0 - -134081.8
Case 5 Wind Case : SR - CWLL - - 22108.1 - -19745.4 - 0.0 - -134081.8
Case 6 Wind Case : SR - EP - - 22108.1 - -19745.4 - 0.0 - -134081.8
Case 7 Wind Case : SD - EP - - 19709.0 - -21331.3 - 0.0 - -123887.1
Seis.com Case 8 Seismic Case - - 22048.2 - -19661.6 - 0.0 - -135276.1
congestion factor
Conge
as per
factor
IRC:6
stion
Case 9 Normal Case : SR - CWLL 21974.5 -19745.4 0.0 - -134080.7

Case 10 Wind Case : SR - CWLL 22108.1 -19745.4 0.0 - -134081.8

Rare combination
State (Table 3.3 IRC: 6
Servicebility of Limit
Case 2 Normal Case : SR - CWLL - - 24231.6 - -20014.3 - 1981.5 - -146091.0

- 2014)

Quasi
permanent
Comb Case 9 Normal Case : SD - EP - - 20746.3 - -22454.0 - 0.0 - -130407.5
Case 1 Normal Case - - 24231.6 - -20014.3 - 1981.5 - -146091.0

Pressu
Base
re
Case 2 Wind case - - 23372.5 - -20719.5 - 1981.5 - -141557.3

Case 3 Seismic Case - - 23589.4 - -20522.6 - 396.3 - -143260.3
design of foundation (Table 3.4 IRC: 6 -

Comb-1 Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - 31529.1 - -28003.5 - 2278.7 - -190895.6
2014)

Comb-3 Case 15 Seismic Case - - 31446.4 - -27862.2 - 79.3 - -192689.2
Page 23
PROJECT:
CS RCB
7.2 Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL (LWL condition) 280.460 m
Pressure Horizontal Ecc. @ Moment Pressure Horizonta Ecc. @

p in Moment
Force Base of @ Base of p in Base of
Length Height Unit Weight Height l Force @ Base of
S. No. Item 3 longitudal HL Abutment Abutment transverse Return
(m) (m) (KN/m ) (m) HT Return wall
direction eL ML direction wall
(KN) MT (KNm)
(KN/m2) (KN) (m) (KNm) (KN/m^2) eT (m)
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level-N 221.3 8.55 1890.6 0.0 8.55 0.00
25
Centrifugal Force above deck level-N 59.1 11.86 700.4 0.0 11.86 0.00
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level-W 120.0 8.55 1025.4 0.0 8.55 0.00
26
Centrifugal Force above deck level-W 59.1 11.86 700.4 0.0 11.86 0.00
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level-S 140.3 8.55 1198.4 0.0 8.55 0.00
27
Centrifugal Force above deck level-S 59.1 11.86 700.4 0.0 11.86 0.00
28 Live Load Surcharge Pressure 12.000 1.20 20.00 6.71 857.7 5.33 4571.7 1.20 6.71 0.0 5.58 0.00
29 Active Earth Pressure up to LWL (Normal case) 12.000 10.66 20.00 59.56 3809.8 4.48 17057.0 10.16 56.77 0.0 4.77 0.00
30 Active Earth Pressure below LWL ( Normal case) 12.000 0.00 20.00 59.56 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 56.77 0.0 0.50 0.00
31 Active Earth Pressure up to LWL (seismic case) 12.000 10.66 20.00 76.53 4894.9 4.48 21915.5 10.16 72.94 0.0 4.8 0.0
32 Active Earth Pressure below LWL (seismic case) 12.000 0.00 20.00 76.53 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 72.94 0.0 0.5 0.0
33 Minimum Fluid Pressure 12.000 10.66 4.80 51.17 3272.7 3.55 11629.0 10.16 48.77 0.0 3.89 0.00
34 Governing = Max. of (29 + 30 ) & 33 3809.8 17057.0 0.0 0.00
35 Governing = Max. of (31 + 32 ) & 33 4894.9 21915.5
36 Passive Pressure below MSL 12.000 3.50 18.000 0.00 0.0 1.17 0.0
37 Horizontal force due to seismic 316.9 2480.8 329.0 2405.37
38 Horizontal force due to wind 23.8 10.03 239.0 95.3 10.03 955.86
39 Wind force on live load 0.0 12.16 0.0 0.0 12.16 0.00
40 Wind force on abutment cap 0.3 7.94 2.1 1.0 7.94 8.23
41 Wind force on abutment 1.8 5.50 10.1 7.4 5.50 40.53
Basic Combination
Case 1 Normal Case : SR - EP - - - - 7066.3 - 34051.2 - - 0.0 - 0.0

Equilibrium (Table
3.1 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Case 2 Normal Case : SR - CWLL - - - - 7164.4 - 34958.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0

verification of
Case 3 Normal Case : SD - EP - - - - 5714.6 - 25585.5 - - 0.0 - 0.0

Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - - - 6988.7 - 33433.0 - - 155.6 - 1506.9
Case 5 Wind Case : SR - CWLL - - - - 7035.8 - 33886.3 - - 93.4 - 904.2
Case 6 Wind Case : SR - EP - - - - 6973.2 - 33282.3 - - 93.4 - 904.2
Case 7 Wind Case : SD - EP - - - - 5716.5 - 25596.5 - - 7.6 - 43.9
Seis.com Case 8 Seismic Case - - - - 5410.2 - 26016.5 - - 148.1 - 1082.4
Rare combination
State (Table 3.3 IRC: 6 -

2014)

Quasi
permanent
comb
Co
on
ng
es
ti
Case 1 Normal Case - - - - 4947.8 - 24219.7 - - 0.0 - 0.0

Base
Case 2 Wind Case - - - - 4872.5 - 23603.6 - - 103.7 - 1004.6
Pressure
Case 3 Seismic Case - - - - 6268.9 - 30866.9 - - 329.0 - 2405.4

design of foundation (Table 3.4 IRC: 6 -

Comb-1 Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - - - 6988.7 - 33433.0 - - 155.6 - 1506.9
2014)

Comb-3 Case 15 Seismic Case - - - - 5683.0 - 27941.8 - - 199.9 - 1461.3
Case 19 Wind Case : SR - CWLL(comb 2 - - - - 5831 - 26947 - - 82 - 804
C
n
g
o
Page 24
PROJECT:
CS RCB
7.3 Check for Equilibrium:
Case-1 Case-2 Case-3 Case-4 Case-5 Case-6 Case-7 Case-8 Case-9 Case-10
Total Vertical Load 21974.5 21974.5 19709.0 22197.08 22108.05 22108.05 19709.01 22048.24 21974.51 22108.05
Total Longitudinal Moment 14305.8 15212.6 4254.3 13687.56 14140.89 13536.86 4265.24 6354.89 11326.16 11552.20
Total Transverse Moment 0.0 0.0 0.0 1506.94 904.17 904.17 43.89 1082.42 0 904
Total Horizontal Force 7066.3 7164.4 5714.6 6990.45 7036.44 6973.78 5716.52 5412.21 6744 6768
Coeff. of friction bet'n soil and concrete 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
Resisting Moment 134081.8 134081.8 123887.1 134081.8 134081.8 134081.8 123887.1 135276.1 134081 134082
Overturning Moment 34051.2 34958.0 25585.5 33433 33886 33282 25596 26017 31072 31298
FOS against sliding 2.18 2.15 2.41 2.22 2.20 2.22 2.41 2.85 2.28 2.29
> > > > > > > > > >
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Status OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
FOS against overturning 3.94 3.84 4.84 4.01 3.96 4.03 4.84 5.20 4.32 4.28
> > > > > > > > > >
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
7.4.1 Check for Permissible Stresses:

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11
Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
For Servicebility of Limit State
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
(Table 3.3 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60
Vertical Load P 23953.2 24231.6 20746.3 23346.0 23313.1 23286.7 20746.3 23118.3 20746.3 24383 23313.1
Longitudinal Moment ML 2448.5 3291.1 -5396.9 1521.8 1871.3 1421.4 -5389.6 -3736.5 -5396.9 806 145.5
Transverse Moment MT 1486.1 1981.5 0.0 2490.7 2584.3 2088.9 29.3 0.0 0.0 2279 2881.5
P/A 191.9 194.2 166.2 187.1 186.8 186.6 166.2 185.2 166.2 195.4 186.8
ML / ZL 11.3 15.2 -24.9 7.0 8.7 6.6 -24.9 -17.3 -24.9 3.7 0.7
MT / ZT 6.0 7.9 0.0 10.0 10.4 8.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 9.1 11.5
Pressure below Point A pa 209.21 217.32 141.29 204.09 205.81 201.54 141.44 167.97 141.29 208.23 199.03
Pressure below Point B pb 197.30 201.44 141.29 184.13 185.11 184.80 141.21 167.97 141.29 189.97 175.94
Pressure below Point C pc 186.57 186.89 191.19 190.02 188.51 188.40 191.27 202.52 191.19 200.78 197.68
Pressure below Point D pd 174.67 171.02 191.19 170.06 167.80 171.66 191.04 202.52 191.19 182.52 174.59
7.4.2 Check for Base Pressure:

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5
Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
(Table 3.4 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60

For Base Pressure
Vertical Load P 24231.6 23372.5 23589.4 24382.7 23372.5

Longitudinal Moment ML 4205.4 2884.1 10344.2 1614.4 1158.3
Transverse Moment MT 1981.5 2986.1 2801.7 2278.7 3283.3
P/A 194.2 187.3 189.0 195.4 187.3
ML / ZL 19.4 13.3 47.8 7.5 5.4
MT / ZT 7.9 12.0 11.2 9.1 13.2
Pressure below Point A pa 221.55 212.58 248.07 211.97 205.79
Pressure below Point B pb 205.67 188.65 225.62 193.71 179.48
Pressure below Point C pc 182.67 185.92 152.43 197.05 195.08
Pressure below Point D pd 166.79 161.99 129.98 178.79 168.78
7.4.3 Check for Design of Foundation (ULS):

Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13
Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
For Design of Foundation
(Table 3.4 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60
Vertical Load P 32586.8 32976.4 28007.5 31529.1 31598.7 31561.7 28007.5 24125.8 24500.7 20746.3 23417.0 23374.5 23342.8
Longitudinal Moment ML 6943.8 8123.4 -4727.3 5429.4 5993.8 5363.9 -4716.3 9248.5 10288.2 -279.8 8078.6 8493.0 7953.0
Transverse Moment MT 2278.7 2972.2 0.0 3785.7 3876.4 3182.9 43.9 1981.5 2575.9 0.0 3287.5 3379.6 2785.2
P/A 261.1 264.2 224.4 252.6 253.2 252.9 224.4 193.3 196.3 166.2 187.6 187.3 187.0
ML / ZL 32.1 37.6 -21.9 25.1 27.7 24.8 -21.8 42.8 47.6 -1.3 37.3 39.3 36.8
MT / ZT 9.1 11.9 0.0 15.2 15.5 12.8 0.2 7.9 10.3 0.0 13.2 13.5 11.2
Pressure below Point A pa 302.35 313.70 202.57 292.91 296.44 290.45 202.80 244.01 254.20 164.95 238.16 240.10 234.97
Pressure below Point B pb 284.09 289.88 202.57 262.57 265.38 264.95 202.45 228.14 233.56 164.95 211.82 213.02 212.65
Pressure below Point C pc 238.15 238.59 246.28 242.71 241.02 240.86 246.40 158.51 159.08 167.54 163.47 161.58 161.44
Pressure below Point D pd 219.89 214.78 246.28 212.38 209.96 215.36 246.05 142.63 138.44 167.54 137.12 134.50 139.12
Case 14 Case 15 Case 16 Case 17 Case 18 Case 19

Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60
(Table 3.4 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Vertical Load P 20746.3 31446.4 32976 31599 24697 23375

Longitudinal Moment ML -270.1 79.6 4396 3405 7057 6264
Transverse Moment MT 39.0 1540.5 3418 4322 2962 3766
P/A 166.2 252.0 264.2 253.2 197.9 187.3
ML / ZL -1.2 0.4 20.3 15.7 32.6 29.0
MT / ZT 0.2 6.2 13.7 17.3 11.9 15.1
Pressure below Point A pa 165.15 258.52 298.25 286.26 242.39 231.35
Pressure below Point B pb 164.84 246.18 270.86 251.62 218.66 201.17
Pressure below Point C pc 167.65 257.78 257.61 254.78 177.14 173.43
Pressure below Point D pd 167.33 245.44 230.22 220.14 153.41 143.26
Normal Case: Wind Case: Seismic Case:

Max. Base Pressure = 221.55 Safe Max. Base Pressure = 212.58 Safe Max. Base Pressure = 248.07 Safe
Min. Base Pressure = 166.79 Safe Min. Base Pressure = 161.99 Safe Min. Base Pressure = 129.98 Safe
Page 25
PROJECT:
CS RCB
7.5 Normal Case with Minimum Load (HFL): (The portions below hfl are acted upon by full buoyant force and their submerged unit weights are taken)
7.5 Vertical Loads and their moments about C/L of base 248.07 Safe
129.98 Safe
S. No. Volume g P eL ML eT MT eToe Mtoe
Item 3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
1 Dead Load Reaction 1710.00 0.700 1197.00 0.000 0.00 -4.500 -7695.0
2 SIDL Reaction I 240.00 0.700 168.00 0.000 0.00 -4.500 -1080.0
3 SIDL Reaction II(surfacing) 242.0 0.700 169.4 0.000 0.0 -4.500 -1089.0
4 FPLL Reaction 105.75 0.700 74.03 0.000 0.00 -4.500 -475.9
CWLL Reaction - Normal 362.79 0.700 253.95 4.200 1523.72 -4.500 -1632.6
5 CWLL Reaction - Wind 0.00 0.700 0.00 4.200 0.00 -4.500 0.0
CWLL Reaction - Seismic 72.56 0.700 50.79 4.200 304.74 -4.500 -326.5
6 SIDL over Returns 7.500 5.38 40.35 -2.510 -101.28 0.000 0.00 -7.710 -311.1
7 Dirt Wall 11.573 25.00 289.32 -0.020 -5.79 0.000 0.00 -5.220 -1510.3
8 Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 5.112 25.00 127.80 0.490 62.62 0.000 0.00 -4.710 -601.9
9 Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.716 25.00 117.90 0.490 57.77 0.000 0.00 -4.710 -555.3
10 Abutment Shaft to HFL 4.490 25.00 112.26 0.595 66.74 0.000 0.00 -4.605 -517.0
11 Abutment Shaft below HFL 90.413 15.00 1356.20 0.490 664.95 0.000 0.00 -4.710 -6387.3
12 Backfill upto HFL 199.574 20.00 3991.49 -2.695 -10756.40 0.000 0.00 -7.895 -31512.1
13 Backfill below HFL 362.899 10.00 3628.99 -2.811 -10200.74 0.000 0.00 -8.011 -29071.5
14 Front Fill 84.000 10.00 840.00 3.486 2928.00 0.000 0.00 -1.714 -1440.0
15 Toe Slab 60.000 15.00 900.00 2.800 2520.00 0.000 0.00 -2.400 -2160.0
16 Heel Slab 72.000 15.00 1080.00 -2.320 -2505.60 0.000 0.00 -7.520 -8121.6
17 Slab below shaft 38.400 15.00 576.00 0.400 230.40 0.000 0.00 -4.800 -2764.8
18 Cantilever Return Wall 0.000 25.00 0.00 -5.200 -0.01 0.000 0.00 -10.400 0.0
19 Solid Return Wall (above HFL) 9.147 5.00 45.74 -2.695 -123.25 0.000 0.00 -7.895 -361.1
20 Solid Return Wall (below HFL) 16.633 5.00 83.16 -2.811 -233.77 0.000 0.00 -8.011 -666.2
21 Vertical load due to seismic effect -163.85 -55.86 -796.18
22 Wind force 148.38
Basic Combination

(Table 3.1 IRC: 6-

verification of
Equilibrium

2014)

Seis.com Case 8 Seismic Case - - 14550.5 - -15144.2 - 0.0 - -92300.7

Rare combination

2014)

Quasi
permanent
comb. Case 9 Normal Case : SD - EP - - 13189.2 - -17396.4 - 0.0 - -85980.2
Case 1 Normal case - - 15849.7 - -15534.0 - 1523.7 - -97952.6

Base
Pressure
Case 2 Wind Case - - 15487.0 - -15787.9 - 0.0 - -96320.1
Case 3 Seismic Case - - 15395.7 - -15793.0 - 304.7 - -96646.6
design of foundation (Table 3.4 IRC: 6

- 2014)

Comb-3 Case 15 Seismic Case - - 20776.4 - -21448.8 - 60.9 - -130374.3
Page 26
PROJECT:
CS RCB
7.6 Horizontal Forces and their Moments @ RL 280.460 m
Eccentricit
Pressure Moment Pressure Horizontal Eccentricity Moment
Horizontal y
p in @Base of p in Force @Base of @ Base of
Length Height UnitWeight Force @Base of Height
S. No. Item longitudal abutment transverse HT return wall return wall
(m) (m) (KN/m3) HL abutment (m)
direction ML direction eT MT
(KN) eL 2
(KN/m2) (KNm) (KN/m ) (KN) (m) (KNm)
(m)
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level-N 170.00 8.55 1452.65 0.00 8.55 0.00
22
Centrifugal Force above deck level -N 59.06 11.86 700.39 0.00 11.86 0.00
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level-W 120.0 8.55 1025.4 0.0 8.55 0.00
23
Centrifugal Force above deck level-W 59.1 11.86 700.4 0.0 11.86 0.00
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level-S 140.3 8.55 1198.4 0.0 8.55 0.00
24
Centrifugal Force above deck level-S 0.0 11.86 0.0 0.0 11.86 0.00
25 Live Load Surcharge Pressure 12.000 1.20 20.00 6.71 845.66 5.33 4507.37 1.20 6.71 0.00 5.58 0.00
26 Active Earth Pressure up to HFL(Normal case) 12.000 3.32 20.00 18.55 369.54 8.44 3117.27 3.32 18.55 0.00 8.73 0.00
27 Active Earth Pressure below HFL (Normal case) 12.000 7.34 10.00 39.06 2537.10 3.23 8206.33 6.84 37.66 0.00 3.53 0.00
30 Minimum Fluid Pressure 12.000 10.66 4.80 51.17 3272.71 3.55 11629.01 10.16 48.77 0.00 3.89 0.00
31 Governing = Max. of (26 + 27 ) &30 3272.71 11629.01 0.00 0.00
33 Passive Pressure below MSL 12.000 3.50 10.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.00
35 Horizontal force due to wind on superstructure 23.8 10.03 239.0 95.3 10.03 955.86
36 Wind force on live load 0.0 12.16 0.0 0.0 12.16 0.00
37 Wind force on abutment cap 0.3 7.94 2.1 1.0 7.94 8.23
38 Wind force on abutment upto HFL 0.1 7.49 0.9 0.5 7.49 3.70
Basic Combination

Equilibrium (Table
3.1 IRC: 6 - 2014)

verification of

Seis.com Case 8 Seismic Case - - - - 3983.8 - 17519.7 - - 44.4 - 324.7

Rare combination

2014)

quasi Case 8 Normal Case : SR - EP - - - - 3272.7 - 11629.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0
permanent
comb Case 9 Normal Case : SD - EP - - - - 3272.7 - 11629.0 - - 0.0 - 0.0
Case 1 Normal Case - - - - 4347.4 - 18289.4 - - 0.0 - 0.0

Pressu
Base
re
Case 2 Wind Case - - - - 4321.6 - 17862.2 - - 96.9 - 967.8

Case 3 Seismic Case - - - - 4575.6 - 17334.8 - - 98.7 - 721.6
design of foundation (Table 3.4

IRC: 6 - 2014)

Page 27
PROJECT:
CS RCB
7.7 Check for Equilibrium:
Total Vertical Load 14624.2 14624.2 12529.7 14846.82 14757.79 14757.79 12529.74 14550.51 14624 14758
Total Longitudinal Moment 9809.9 10563.4 458.9 9681.44 10140.30 9536.27 461.54 2375.49 7334 7552
Total Transverse Moment 0.0 0.0 0.0 1451.69 871.02 871.02 17.90 324.73 0 871
Total Horizontal Force 5638.2 5718.3 4360.0 5618.86 5665.79 5603.13 4360.29 3984.08 5375 5397
Coeff. of friction bet'n soil and concrete 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70
Resisting Moment 91106.5 91106.5 81681.2 91106.5 91106.5 91106.5 81681.2 92300.7 91106 91106
Overturning Moment 24870.2 25623.8 16985.4 24741.83 25200.69 24596.66 16988.08 17519.67 22394 22612
FOS against sliding 1.82 1.79 2.01 1.85 1.82 1.84 2.01 2.56 1.90 1.91
> > > > > > > > > >
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FOS against overturning 3.66 3.56 4.81 3.68 3.62 3.70 4.81 5.27 4.07 4.03
> > > > > > > > > >
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
7.8.1 Check for Permissible Stresses (SLS):
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11
Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60
Vertical Load P 15732.6 15849.7 13189.2 15608.9 15576.0 15594.1 13189.2 15381.2 13189.2 15904 15576.0
For Servicebility of Limit
Longitudinal Moment ML 1233.7 1854.0 -5767.3 964.8 1317.9 868.0 -5765.6 -4232.9 -5767.3 -261 -407.9
Transverse Moment MT 1142.8 1523.7 0.0 967.8 580.7 580.7 7.2 0.0 0.0 1752 580.7
P/A 126.1 127.0 105.7 125.1 124.8 125.0 105.7 123.2 105.7 127.4 124.8
2014)
ML / ZL 5.7 8.6 -26.7 4.5 6.1 4.0 -26.7 -19.6 -26.7 -1.2 -1.9
MT / ZT 4.6 6.1 0.0 3.9 2.3 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 2.3
Pressure below Point A pa 136.35 141.68 79.03 133.41 133.23 131.30 79.06 103.68 79.03 133.26 125.25
Pressure below Point B pb 127.19 129.47 79.03 125.66 128.58 126.64 79.01 103.68 79.03 119.22 120.60
Pressure below Point C pc 124.94 124.54 132.35 124.49 121.05 123.27 132.37 142.82 132.35 135.67 129.02
Pressure below Point D pd 115.79 112.33 132.35 116.74 116.39 118.62 132.31 142.82 132.35 121.63 124.37
7.8.2 Check for Base Pressure:
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5

Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60
Vertical Load P 15849.7 15487.0 15395.7 15904.2 15487.0
For Base Pressure (Table
Longitudinal Moment ML 2755.4 2074.2 1541.8 640.5 348.4

3.4 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Transverse Moment MT 1523.7 967.8 1026.4 1752.3 967.8

P/A 127.0 124.1 123.4 127.4 124.1
ML / ZL 12.7 9.6 7.1 3.0 1.6
MT / ZT 6.1 3.9 4.1 7.0 3.9
Pressure below Point A pa 145.85 137.57 134.61 137.42 129.59
Pressure below Point B pb 133.64 129.81 126.38 123.38 121.83
Pressure below Point C pc 120.37 118.39 120.35 131.50 126.37
Pressure below Point D pd 108.16 110.63 112.13 117.46 118.61
7.8.3 Check for Design of Foundation (ULS):
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13
Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60
Vertical Load P 21400.2 21564.2 17805.4 21205.6 21153.6 21116.6 17805.4 15849.7 16062.9 13189.2 15679.9 15637.4 15605.7
(Table 3.4 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Longitudinal Moment ML 3901.5 4769.9 -6499.7 3481.1 3965.8 3335.9 -6497.0 5847.1 6642.2 -2675.7 5480.4 5899.4 5359.5
Transverse Moment MT 1752.3 2285.6 0.0 1451.7 871.0 871.0 10.7 1523.7 1980.8 0.0 1258.1 774.2 774.2
P/A 171.5 172.8 142.7 169.9 169.5 169.2 142.7 127.0 128.7 105.7 125.6 125.3 125.0
ML / ZL 18.0 22.1 -30.0 16.1 18.3 15.4 -30.0 27.0 30.7 -12.4 25.3 27.3 24.8
MT / ZT 7.0 9.2 0.0 5.8 3.5 3.5 0.0 6.1 7.9 0.0 5.0 3.1 3.1
Pressure below Point A pa 196.54 204.00 112.63 191.83 191.33 188.12 112.69 160.14 167.36 93.32 156.02 155.68 152.93
Pressure below Point B pb 182.50 185.69 112.63 180.20 184.35 181.14 112.60 147.93 151.48 93.32 145.94 149.47 146.72
Pressure below Point C pc 160.47 159.90 172.72 159.65 154.66 157.28 172.75 106.08 105.94 118.06 105.35 101.13 103.38
Pressure below Point D pd 146.43 141.59 172.72 148.01 147.68 150.30 172.67 93.87 90.07 118.06 95.27 94.93 97.17
Case 14 Case 15 Case 16 Case 17 Case 18 Case 19

Area of footing A 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80 124.80
Section Modulus along L-L ZL 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32 216.32
Section Modulus along T-T ZT 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60 249.60
Vertical Load P 13189.2 20776.4 21646 21154 16134 15637
(Table 3.4 IRC: 6 - 2014)
Longitudinal Moment ML -2673.3 -1591.2 1597 1377 3893 3656

Transverse Moment MT 9.5 1522.2 2628 871 2278 774
P/A 105.7 166.5 173.4 169.5 129.3 125.3
ML / ZL -12.4 -7.4 7.4 6.4 18.0 16.9
MT / ZT 0.0 6.1 10.5 3.5 9.1 3.1
Pressure below Point A pa 93.37 165.23 191.36 179.36 156.40 145.31
Pressure below Point B pb 93.29 153.03 170.30 172.38 138.15 139.10
Pressure below Point C pc 118.08 179.94 176.60 166.63 120.41 111.51
Pressure below Point D pd 118.01 167.74 155.53 159.65 102.16 105.30
Normal Case: Wind Case: Seismic Case:

Max. Base Pressure = 145.85 Safe Max. Base Pressure = 137.57 Safe Max. Base Pressure = 134.61 Safe
Min. Base Pressure = 108.16 Safe Min. Base Pressure = 110.63 Safe Min. Base Pressure = 112.13 Safe
Page 28
PROJECT: STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY 18.04.23
CS RCB
8.0 Design of Abutment Shaft (ULS):
8.1.1 Vertical Loads and Moments
Volume g P eL ML eT MT
S. No. Item 3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
1 Dead Load Reaction 1890.0 0.30 567.0 0.00 0.0
2 SIDL Reaction I 240.0 0.30 72.0 0.00 0.0
3 SIDL Reaction II(surfacing) 242.0 0.30 72.6 0.00 0.0
4 FPLL Reaction 105.8 0.30 31.7 0.00 0.0
CWLL Reaction - Normal 1007.5 0.30 302.2 1.77 1784.3
5 CWLL Reaction - Wind 0.0 0.30 0.0 1.77 0.0
CWLL Reaction - Seismic 20% of LL 201.5 0.30 60.4 1.77 356.9
6 Dirt Wall 11.6 25.0 289.3 -0.42 -121.5 0.00 0.0
7 Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 5.1 25.0 127.8 0.09 11.5 0.00 0.0
8 Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.7 25.0 117.9 0.09 10.6 0.00 0.0
9 Abutment Shaft upto LWL 76.1 25.0 1903.2 0.11 217.7 0.00 0.0
10 Abutment Shaft below LWL 18.8 25.0 469.4 0.02 8.2 0.00 0.0
11 Wind Force 148.4
12 Vertical load due to seismic effect 163.9 55.9
Case 1 Normal Case : SR - EP - - 8403.2 - 1587.2 - 2051.9

Verification of
Partial Safety
Case 2 Normal Case : SR - CWLL - - 8792.9 - 1704.0 - 2676.4

Structural
factor for
Case 3 Normal Case : SD - EP - - 3824.0 - 213.4 - 0.0

Comb-1 Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - 7467.2 - 1239.6 - 0.0
Case 5 Wind Case : SR - CWLL - - 7415.2 - 1250.7 - 0.0
Case 6 Wind Case : SR - EP - - 7378.2 - 1239.6 - 0.0
Case 7 Wind Case : SD - EP - - 3957.5 - 213.4 - 0.0
8.1.2 Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 282.460 m
Horizonta Eccentri. Moment

Unit Pressure
Length Height l Force @ Shaft @ Shaft
S. No. Item Weight p
HL Base eL Base ML
3 2
(m) (m) (kN/m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm)
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level -N 221.3 6.5 1448.1
13
Centrifugal Force above deck level - N 59.1 9.86 582.3
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level -W 120.0 6.55 785.4
14
Centrifugal Force above deck level - W 59.1 9.86 582.3
Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level - S 140.3 6.55 917.9
15
Centrifugal Force above deck level - S 59.1 9.86 582.3
16 Live Load Surcharge Pressure 12.0 1.2 20.0 7.4 767.4 4.33 3323.1
17 Active Earth Pressure up to LWL (Normal case) 12.0 8.7 20.0 53.3 2769.2 3.64 10072.2
18 Active Earth Pressure below LWL (Normal case) 12.0 0.0 20.0 53.3 0.0 0.00 0.0
21 Minimum Fluid Pressure 12.0 8.7 4.8 41.6 2159.9 2.89 6234.8
22 Governing = Max. of (17 + 18 ) & 21 2769.2 10072.2
24 Horizontal force due to wind 23.8 8.03 191.3
25 Wind force on live load 0.0 10.16 0.0
26 Wind force on abutment cap 0.3 5.9 1.5
27 Wind force on abutment 1.8 3.50 6.4
Page 29
CS RCB
Case 1 Normal Case : SR - EP - - - - 5397.1 - 21430.9

Verification of
Partial Safety
Case 2 Normal Case : SR - CWLL - - - - 5495.2 - 22141.5

Structural
factor for
Case 3 Normal Case : SD - EP - - - - 4153.8 - 15108.3

Comb-1 Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - - - 5319.6 - 20967.7
Case 5 Wind Case : SR - CWLL - - - - 5366.7 - 21326.8
Case 6 Wind Case : SR - EP - - - - 5304.0 - 20848.1
Case 7 Wind Case : SD - EP - - - - 4155.7 - 15115.5
8.2 Normal Case with Minimum Load (HFL): (The portions below HFL are acted upon by 15% buoyant force and accordingly unit weights are taken)
8.2.1 Vertical Loads and their moments about C/L of base
S. No. Item 3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
2 SIDL Reaction I 240.0 0.30 72.0 0.00 0.0
4 FPLL Reaction 105.8 0.30 31.7 0.00 0.0
CWLL Reaction - Seismic 72.6 0.30 21.8 4.20 304.7
6 Dirt Wall 11.6 25.0 289.3 -0.42 -121.5 0.00 0.0
9 Abutment Shaft to HFL 4.5 25.0 112.3 0.19 21.8 0.00 0.0
10 Abutment Shaft below HFL 90.4 23.5 2124.7 0.09 191.9 0.00 0.0
11 Wind Force 148.4
12 Vertical load due to seismic effect -163.9 -55.9

Partial Safety
Verification of

Structural
factor for

Comb-1 Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - 7041.1 - 1150.1 - 0.0
8.2.2 Horizontal Forces and their Moments @ RL 282.460 m

Unit Pressure,
S. No. Item Weight. p
HL Base eL Base ML
3 2
(m) (m) (kN/m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm)
13
14
15
17 Active Earth Pressure up to HFL(Normal case) 12.0 3.3 20.0 20.4 407.0 6.73 2740.9
18 Active Earth Pressure below HFL (Normal case) 12.0 5.3 10.0 36.9 1835.7 2.41 4432.9
22 Governing = Max. of (17 + 18 ) &21 2242.7 7173.8
23 Governing = Max. of (19 + 20 ) &21 2159.9 6234.8
27 Wind force on abutment upto HFL 0.1 5.49 0.7
28 Horizontal force due to seismic 316.9 2480.8
Totals 3239.2 12191.8
Page 30
CS RCB

Partial Safety
Verification of

Structural
factor for

Comb-1 Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - - - 4527.3 - 16611.5
8.3 Summary of Loads and Moments on the Abutment Shaft:

Vertical Longitudinal Transverse
Load Moment Moment
S.No Load Case
P ML MT
(KN) (KNm ) (KNm )
1 Normal Case with Max Load (LWL) 9020.0 23914.0 3078.0
2 Normal Case with Min Load (HFL) 7482.0 18640.0 2629.0
3 Wind Case with Max Load (LWL) 7468.0 22578.0 0.0
4 Wind Case with Min Load (HFL) 7042.0 18136.0 0.0
NOTE: The Abutment Shaft has been designed using Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS 456:1978 Limit State method.
Page 31
PROJECT: STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM 18.04.23
GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR &
CS RCB
8.0 Design of Abutment Shaft (SLS):
8.1.1 Vertical Loads and Moments
S. No. Item
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
2 SIDL Reaction I 240.0 0.30 72.0 0.00 0.0
4 FPLL Reaction 105.8 0.30 31.7 0.00 0.0
CWLL Reaction - Seismic 20% of LL 201.5 0.30 60.4 1.77 356.9
6 Dirt Wall 11.6 25.0 289.3 -0.42 -121.5 0.00 0.0
9 Abutment Shaft upto LWL 76.1 25.0 1903.2 0.11 217.7 0.00 0.0
10 Abutment Shaft below LWL 18.8 25.0 469.4 0.02 8.2 0.00 0.0
11 Wind Force 148.4
Servicebility of Limit State

(Table 3.3 IRC:6 - 2014)
Rare combination
Partial safety factor for

Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - 5428.0 - 838.2 - 0.0
Quasi Case 8 Normal Case : SR - EP - - 5279.6 - 838.2 - 0.0
permanent
Case 9 Normal Case : SD- EP - - 2907.6 - 126.6 - 0.0
8.1.2 Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 282.460 m

Unit Pressure
S. No. Item Weight p
HL Base eL Base ML
(m) (m) (kN/m3) (kN/m2) (kN) (m) (kNm)
1
2
3
5 Active Earth Pressure up to LWL 12.0 8.7 20.0 53.3 2769.2 3.64 10072.2
6 Active Earth Pressure below LWL 12.0 0.0 20.0 53.3 0.0 0.00 0.0
8 Governing = Max. of (5 + 6 ) & 7 2769.2 10072.2
3817.0 15425.6

Rare combination
State (Table 3.3 IRC:6 -

Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - - - 3543.4 - 13955.7
2014)

Quasi Case 8 Normal Case : SR - EP - - - - 2825.3 - 10478.3
permanent
Case 9 Normal Case : SD- EP - - - - 2769.2 - 10072.2
Page 32
CS RCB
8.2 Normal Case with Minimum Load (HFL): (The portions below HFL are acted upon by 15% buoyant force and accordingly unit weights are taken)
8.2.1 Vertical Loads and their moments about C/L of base
S. No. Item
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
2 SIDL Reaction I 240.0 0.30 72.0 0.00 0.0
4 FPLL Reaction 105.8 0.30 31.7 0.00 0.0
CWLL Reaction - Seismic 72.6 0.30 21.8 4.20 304.7
6 Dirt Wall 11.6 25.0 289.3 -0.42 -121.5 0.00 0.0
9 Abutment Shaft to HFL 4.5 25.0 112.3 0.19 21.8 0.00 0.0
10 Abutment Shaft below HFL 90.4 15.0 1356.2 0.09 122.5 0.00 0.0
11 Wind Force 148.4

Rare combination

Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - 4423.2 - 726.3 - 0.0
2014)

Quasi Case 8 Normal Case : SR - EP - - 4195.5 - 702.5 - 0.0
permanent Case 9 Normal Case : SD- EP - - 2003.5 - 44.9 - 0.0
8.2.2 Horizontal Forces and their Moments @ RL 282.460 m

Unit Pressure,
S. No. Item Weight. p
HL Base eL Base ML
(m) (m) (kN/m3) (kN/m2) (kN) (m) (kNm)
12
13
14
16 Active Earth Pressure up to HFL 12.0 3.3 20.0 20.4 407.0 6.73 2740.9
17 Active Earth Pressure below HFL 12.0 5.3 10.0 36.9 1835.7 2.41 4432.9

Rare combination

Case 4 Wind Case : SR - Wind - - - - 3016.9 - 11061.0
2014)

Quasi Case 8 Normal Case : SR - EP - - - - 2288.6 - 7512.8
permanent
Case 9 Normal Case : SD- EP - - - - 2242.7 - 7173.8
Page 33
CS RCB
8.3 Summary of Loads and Moments on the Abutment Shaft for Stress Check:
Vertical Longitudinal Transverse

Load Moment Moment
S.No Load Case
P ML MT
(KN) (KNm ) (KNm )
1 Normal Case with Max Load (LWL) 6439.0 15947.0 2052.0
2 Normal Case with Min Load (HFL) 4719.0 12387.0 1753.0
3 Wind Case with Max Load (LWL) 5428.0 15057.0 1.0
4 Wind Case with Min Load (HFL) 4424.0 12056.0 1.0
Page 34
PROJECT: STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN
CS RCB
8.4 Design of Abutment Shaft as Cantilever Slab (No Superstructure normal case): ULS
Normal case
Ht from FRL to bottom of shaft = 8.660 m
Earth pressure due to surcharge = 0.308 x 1.200 x 20.000 = 7.39 KN/m^2

Earth pressure due to soil = 0.308 x 8.660 x 20.000 = 53.30 KN/m^2
Considering 1m width of abutment wall
Horizontal force due to surcharge = 7.39 x 8.660 = 64.00 KN

Horizontal force due to soil = 53.30 x 8.660 / 2 = 230.79 KN
Total Horizontal force = 64.00 + 230.79 = 294.79 KN
Moment due to surcharge = 64.00 x 8.660 / 2 = 277.13 KNm

Moment due to soil = 230.79 x 0.420 x 8.660 = 839.43 KNm
Moment due to substructure Dead load -10.13 + 0.958 + 0.884 = 10.55 KNm
+ 19
As per IRC :6-2014 ,Table 3.2
Case:1(Basic Combination) L.F Case:2 L.F
Normal case EP leading condition 1.5 Normal case EP accompanying condition 1.0
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 Live Load Surcharge 1.2
Case:3(Seismic combination) Permanent loads: Adding to the effect of variable loads 1.35
Normal case EP leading condition 1.0
Live Load Surcharge 0.2
Case-1 Case-2 Case-3
Moment due to surcharge 333 333 62
Moment due to soil 1259 839 941
14.2 load 14.2
Moment due to substructure Dead 10.5
Total Moment at the base of shaft = 332.56 + 1259.15 + 10.55 = 1602 KNm
Effective depth required = = 1179.03 mm
Total depth provided = = 1600.00 mm
Effective depth available = 1600 - 50 - 13 = 1522 mm O.K

> 1179.03 Ok
Fav = = 10.72
Factor β = (λ/2) = = 0.4
2
k av = M/Fav*b*d = = 0.065
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) = = 101 mm
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) = = 694 mm
Page 35
PROJECT: STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN
CS RCB
Moment of Resistance(MOR) = 0.87*fy*Ast*d((1-(Ast*fy/b*d*fck)) As per IS:456-2000

= 2088577397 Nmm
= 2088.58 KNm OK
Area of steel required = = 2490 mm^2
Min area of steel req on tension face = Max((0.26*(fctm/fyk)*b*d),(0.0013*b*d)) = 1978 mm^2
Area of transverse steel required on EF = = 800 mm^2
Area of steel to be provided = = 2490 mm^2
Provide 25 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c on earth face in vertical direction. (Ast = 3273 mm^2) OK
+ Provide 0 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c on earth face in vertical direction.
Provide 12 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c on other face in vertical direction. (Ast = 754 mm^2) OK
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c (Ast =
on earth face in horizontal direction. 1341 mm^2) OK
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c (Ast =
on other face in horizontal direction. 1341 mm^2) OK
8.5 Design of Abutment Shaft as Cantilever Slab (No Superstructure normal case): SLS & QPC
Normal case
Ht from FRL to bottom of shaft = 8.660 m
Earth pressure due to surcharge = 0.308 x 1.200 x 20.000 = 7.39 KN/m^2

Earth pressure due to soil = 0.308 x 8.660 x 20.000 = 53.30 KN/m^2
Considering 1m width of abutment wall
Horizontal force due to surcharge = 7.39 x 8.660 = 64.00 KN

Horizontal force due to soil = 53.30 x 8.660 / 2 = 230.79 KN
Total Horizontal force = 64.00 + 230.79 = 294.79 KN
Moment due to surcharge = 64.00 x 8.660 / 2 = 277.13 KNm
Moment due to soil = 230.79 x 0.420 x 8.660 = 839.43 KNm
Moment due to substructure Dead load -10.13 + 0.96 + 0.88
+ 18.83 = 10.55 KNm
Case:1(Rare Combination) L.F Case:2(Quasi Permanent combination) L.F
Normal case EP leading condition 1.0 Normal case EP leading condition 1.0
Live Load Surcharge 0.8 Live Load Surcharge 0.0
Dead Load 1.00 Dead Load 1
Case-1 Case-2
Moment due to surcharge 222 0
Moment due to soil 839 839
10.5 load 10.5
Moment due to substructure Dead
Description of Item Unit case 1 case 2

Total Moment At base of Shaft kNm 1071.7 850.0
Effective depth required mm 517.1 460.5
Overall depth provided mm 1600.0 1600.0
Effective depth provided mm 1521.5 1521.5
Factor Fav Mpa 10.7 10.7
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.04 0.03
modular ratio 6.45 6.45
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) mm 233.25 233.25
In Longitudinal Direction
Area of main steel provided on earth face mm2 3273.00
Moment of inertia of cracked section mm^4 3.9E+10 3.9E+10

rr.eff 0.0167 0.0167
(esm-ecm) 0.0007 0.0005
equivalent Diameter of Bar feq mm 25.00 25.00
Maximum crack spacing Sr,max 424.83 424.83
Stress in Steel(Mpa) Mpa 226.8 179.9
Check (Stress<0.8*fy) O.K O.K
Stress in concrete(Mpa) Mpa 6.4 5.0
O.K O.K
Crack width Wk mm mm 0.229 OK
Page 36
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR
"WIDENING & STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR
& GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
ULS Check For Abutment Shaft:
Max. Vertical Load = 9020 KN

Capacity of the Section (fck*b*d) = 576000 KN
Max. Verical Load < 0.08*capacity of the section.
As per Clause 8.2.1.6 of IRC 112, if the factored vertical load is less than 0.08*fck*c/s area of the section, then the section
can be designed for flexure only neglecting the effect of vertical/axial load.
Page 37
CS RCB
Check for Abutment shaft for SLS condition
Normal Case with Max Load 27-02-2023
Depth of Section = 1.600 m

Width of Section = 12.000 m
along width-compression face- no of bar: 80 tension face- no of bar: 80

Dia (mm) 25 25
Cover (cm) 5.00 5.00
along depth-compression face- no of bar: 9 tension face- no of bar: 9
Dia (mm) 16 16
Cover (cm) 5.00 5.00
Modular Ratio : Compression = 10.0

Modular Ratio : Tension = 10.0
Allowable Concrete Stress = 144.00 Kg/cm^2
Allowable Steel Stress = 4000.00 Kg/cm^2
Axial Load = 643.900 T

Mxx = 1594.700 Tm
Myy = 205.200 Tm
Intercept of Neutral axis : X axis : = 184.300 m

: y axis : = .369 m
Steel Stress Governs Design
Stress in Concrete due to Loads = 61.36 Kg/cm^2

Stress in Steel due to Loads = 2006.53 Kg/cm^2
Percentage of Steel = .43 %
Normal Case with Min Load 27-02-2023



Mxx = 1238.700 Tm
Myy = 175.300 Tm
Intercept of Neutral axis : X axis : = 165.999 m

: y axis : = .364 m

Page 38
CS RCB
wind Case with Max Load 27-02-2023



Mxx = 1505.700 Tm
Myy = .100 Tm
Intercept of Neutral axis : X axis : = ******* m

: y axis : = .346 m

wind Case with Min Load 27-02-2023



Mxx = 1205.600 Tm
Myy = .100 Tm
Intercept of Neutral axis : X axis : = ******* m

: y axis : = .348 m

Page 39
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING & STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT. R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
9.0 Design of Heel and Toe Slab
9.1 Design of Heel Slab for Flexure of LWL condition:
Description of Item Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15
Base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 302.4 313.7 202.6 292.9 296.4 290.5 202.8 244.0 254.2 165.0 238.2 240.1 235.0 165.2 258.5
Base pressure at B : Pb KN/m^2 284.1 289.9 202.6 262.6 265.4 265.0 202.5 228.1 233.6 165.0 211.8 213.0 212.7 164.8 246.2
Base pressure at C : Pc KN/m^2 238.2 238.6 246.3 242.7 241.0 240.9 246.4 158.5 159.1 167.5 163.5 161.6 161.4 167.7 257.8
Base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 219.9 214.8 246.3 212.4 210.0 215.4 246.1 142.6 138.4 167.5 137.1 134.5 139.1 167.3 245.4
Abutment/Footing width m 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Footing Length m 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4
Heel Length m 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8
Pressure at face of Abutment on Heel side : p1 KN/m^2 249.5 249.5 226.1 235.6 235.5 238.3 225.9 182.1 182.4 166.4 171.6 170.7 173.1 166.2 245.8
Upward force due to Base Pressure kN 13519.3 13369.8 13604.8 12900.4 12830.4 13064.0 13593.0 9352.2 9238.8 9616.0 8891.1 8790.9 8990.8 9605.4 14147.4
CG of force from abutment face on Heel side m 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4
Moment due to upward force kNm 31770.4 31298.8 33127.8 30432.0 30215.6 30831.0 33099.0 21538.2 21166.0 23107.4 20547.4 20271.9 20804.7 23081.7 33953.8
Total downward loads KN 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 17064.5
Moment due to downward loads kNm 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 40721.4
Net Design Moment/m of heel kNm/m 745.9 785.2 632.8 857.5 875.5 824.2 635.2 718.8 749.8 588.1 801.4 824.4 780.0 590.2 564.0
Effective depth required mm 431.4 442.6 397.3 462.5 467.4 453.5 398.1 423.5 432.5 383.0 447.1 453.5 441.1 383.7 375.1
Overall depth provided mm 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0
Effective depth provided mm 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5
Factor Fav Mpa 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.019 0.020 0.016 0.022 0.022 0.021 0.016 0.018 0.019 0.015 0.020 0.021 0.020 0.015 0.014
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) mm 37.0 39.0 32.0 43.0 44.0 41.0 32.0 36.0 37.0 29.0 40.0 41.0 39.0 29.0 28.0
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) mm 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0
Area of main steel required at top mm^2 912.3 961.6 789.0 1060.2 1084.9 1010.9 789.0 887.6 912.3 715.0 986.2 1010.9 961.6 715.0 690.4
Minimum area of main steel required at top mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Area of main steel to be provided at top mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Spacing of main steel to be provided at top mm 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3
Area of main steel provided at top 25mm + 0mm dia bars 3273
25mm + 0mm dia bars 150mm c/c
Area of steel required at bottom mm^2 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0
Spacing of steel required at bottom 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2
Area of steel provided at bottom 10mm + 0mm dia bars 262
In Longitudinal Direction 0mm dia bars 300mm c/c
Area of distribution steel required at T&B mm^2 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9 556.9
Spacing of distribution steel at T&B mm 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1
Area of distribution steel provided at T&B 12mm + 0mm dia bars 565
Page 40
PROJECT:
CS RCB
9.2 Design of Heel Slab for Flexure of HFL condition:

Description of Item Unit case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8 case 9 case 10 case 11 case 12 case 13 case 14 case 15
Base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 196.5 204.0 112.6 191.8 191.3 188.1 112.7 160.1 167.4 93.3 156.0 155.7 152.9 93.4 165.2
Base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 146.4 141.6 172.7 148.0 147.7 150.3 172.7 93.9 90.1 118.1 95.3 94.9 97.2 118.0 167.7
Footing Length m 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40
Heel Length m 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80
Pressure at face of Abutment on Heel side : p1 KN/m^2 163.1 162.0 145.0 162.9 164.6 164.5 145.0 118.8 118.4 106.7 118.7 120.1 120.0 106.6 161.0
CG of force from abutment face on Heel side m 2.36 2.35 2.47 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.47 2.31 2.29 2.44 2.31 2.31 2.32 2.44 2.42
Moment due to upward force kNm 21010.0 20517.4 22600.6 21147.8 21198.8 21435.3 22594.2 14132.1 13762.4 15797.3 14250.8 14287.6 14488.1 15791.0 22880.7
Total downward loads KN 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 11356.9
Moment due to downward loads kNm 27023.2 27023.2 27023.2 27023.2 27023.2 27023.2 27023.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 27023.2
Net Design Moment/m of heel kNm/m 501.1 542.2 368.6 489.6 485.4 465.7 369.1 490.4 521.2 351.7 480.5 477.5 460.8 352.2 345.2
Factor Fav Mpa 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400 0.400
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.013 0.014 0.009 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.013 0.013 0.009 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.009
Area of main steel required at top mm^2 616.4 665.7 468.5 616.4 591.7 567.1 468.5 616.4 641.1 443.8 591.7 591.7 567.1 443.8 419.2
Minimum area of main steel required at top mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Area of main steel to be provided at top mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Spacing of main steel to be provided at top mm 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3
Area of main steel provided at top 3273
Area of steel required at bottom mm^2 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0
Spacing of steel required at bottom 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2
Area of steel provided at bottom mm^2 262
Spacing of distribution steel at T&B mm 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1
Area of distribution steel provided at T&B mm^2 565
Page 41
PROJECT:
CS RCB
9.3 Design for Shear in Heel Slab of LWL condition
Shear is checked at the crical section r.e. effective depth distance from the abutment face
Distance of critical section from tip of heel m 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8
Total depth available at critical section m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Effective depth at critical Section mm 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0
Upward Base pressure at critical section KN/m^2 249.5 249.5 226.1 235.6 235.5 238.3 225.9 182.1 182.4 166.4 171.6 170.7 173.1 166.2 245.8
Upward force due to Base pressure kN 13519.3 13369.8 13604.8 12900.4 12830.4 13064.0 13593.0 9352.2 9238.8 9616.0 8891.1 8790.9 8990.8 9605.4 14147.4
C.G of force from critical section m 2.350 2.341 2.435 2.359 2.355 2.360 2.435 2.303 2.291 2.403 2.311 2.306 2.314 2.403 2.400
Moment due to upward loads kN-m 31770.4 31298.8 33127.8 30432.0 30215.6 30831.0 33099.0 21538.2 21166.0 23107.4 20547.4 20271.9 20804.7 23081.7 33953.8
Moment due to downward loads kN-m 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 40721.4 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 40721.4
Shear due to Vertical loads kN 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 17064.5 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 17064.5
Net Design Moment of heel kN-m 8951.1 9422.7 7593.7 10289.4 10505.9 9890.5 7622.4 8625.8 8998.0 7056.7 9616.6 9892.2 9359.3 7082.3 6767.6
Slope of varying depth of heel slab radians 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Net Design shear at critical section/unit length kN/m 173.4 179.4 184.8 206.7 209.6 198.5 185.4 156.4 160.8 155.8 181.3 185.9 176.5 156.4 150.8
Shear resistance without shear reinforcement VRd.c=[0.12*(min((1+sqrt(200/d)),2)*(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33+0.15*σcp]*bw*d where ρ1=(Asl/(bw*d))<=0.02
kN/m
(VRd.c) 484.2
Minimum shear resistance (νRd.c) kN/m VRd.c=(0.031*K^3/2*fck^0.5+0.15*σcp)*bw*d, where K=(1+sqrt(200/d))<=2

494.5
Shear resistance of concrete kN/m 494.5
Status OK
9.4 Design for Shear in Heel Slab of HFL condition

Distance of critical section from tip of heel m 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80 4.80
Effective depth at critical Section mm 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0 1913.0
Upward force due to Base pressure kN 8913.9 8742.0 9150.1 8953.4 8994.0 9067.4 9147.5 6125.8 6004.5 6471.7 6161.2 6193.2 6255.7 6469.1 9466.6
C.G of force from critical section m 2.36 2.35 2.47 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.47 2.31 2.29 2.44 2.31 2.31 2.32 2.44 2.42
Shear due to Vertical loads kN 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 11356.9 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 11356.9
Net Design Moment of heel kN-m 6013.2 6505.9 4422.6 5875.4 5824.5 5587.9 4429.0 5885.1 6254.9 4219.9 5766.4 5729.6 5529.1 4226.2 4142.6
Slope of varying depth of heel slab radians 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Net Design shear at critical section / unit length kN/m 121.6 129.2 123.6 120.2 117.5 114.6 123.7 110.3 115.4 104.2 109.0 106.8 104.4 104.3 101.1
Shear resistance of concrete KN/m 494.5
Status OK
Page 42
PROJECT:
CS RCB
9.5 Design of Toe slab for flexure of LWL condition
Max. base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 302.4 313.7 202.6 292.9 296.4 290.5 202.8 244.0 254.2 165.0 238.2 240.1 235.0 165.2 258.5
Min. base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 219.9 214.8 246.3 212.4 210.0 215.4 246.1 142.6 138.4 167.5 137.1 134.5 139.1 167.3 245.4
Footing Length m 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40
Toe Length m 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Base pressure at face of Abutment on Toe side: p2 KN/m^2 277.7 284.8 219.4 273.6 275.1 271.4 219.6 211.1 217.6 165.9 209.4 209.9 206.7 166.1 258.2
c.g. of force from abutment Face m 2.03 2.03 1.97 2.02 2.02 2.02 1.97 2.05 2.05 2.00 2.04 2.04 2.04 2.00 2.00
Net Design Moment/m of Toe kN-m/m 1543.0 1622.6 855.5 1481.9 1504.7 1462.8 857.2 1264.4 1336.1 722.3 1228.7 1240.3 1204.4 723.8 1257.4
2
k av = M/Fav*b*d 0.039 0.041 0.022 0.038 0.038 0.037 0.022 0.032 0.034 0.018 0.031 0.032 0.031 0.018 0.032
Factor Fav 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7
Area of main steel required at bottom mm^2 1898.5 1997.1 1060.2 1824.5 1849.2 1799.9 1060.2 1553.3 1652.0 887.6 1504.0 1528.7 1479.4 887.6 1553.3
Min Main Ast required at bottom mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Area of main steel to be provided at bottom mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Spacing of main Ast in longitudinal direction at B mm 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3
Area of main steel provided at bottom 25mm + 0mm dia bars 3273
Area of steel required at top (Avg depth Considered) mm^2 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0
Spacing of steel in at top mm 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2
Area of main steel provided at top 10mm + 0mm dia bars 262
Spacing of distribution steel at top & bottom mm 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1
Area of distribution steel provided at T&B 12mm + 0mm dia bars 565
Page 43
PROJECT:
CS RCB
9.6 Design of Toe slab for flexure of HFL condition

Max. base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 196.5 204.0 112.6 191.8 191.3 188.1 112.7 160.1 167.4 93.3 156.0 155.7 152.9 93.4 165.2
Min. base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 146.4 141.6 172.7 148.0 147.7 150.3 172.7 93.9 90.1 118.1 95.3 94.9 97.2 118.0 167.7
Footing Length m 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40
Toe Length m 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Base pressure at face of Abutment on Toe side: p2 KN/m^2 182.7 187.0 135.7 179.5 177.2 176.3 135.8 139.3 143.7 102.8 136.5 134.7 133.9 102.9 170.9
c.g. of force from abutment Face m 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Net Design Moment/m of Toe kN-m/m 1049.3 1100.8 476.7 1015.7 1007.1 987.4 603.2 865.7 915.9 412.0 836.3 829.5 812.6 412.3 851.0
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.027 0.028 0.012 0.026 0.026 0.025 0.015 0.022 0.023 0.011 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.011 0.022
Factor Fav 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7
Area of main steel required at bottom mm^2 1282.1 1356.1 591.7 1257.5 1232.8 1208.1 739.7 1060.2 1134.2 517.8 1035.6 1010.9 986.2 517.8 1035.6
Minimum area of main steel required at bottom mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Area of main steel to be provided at bottom mm^2 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6 2784.6
Spacing of main Ast in longitudinal direction at B mm 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3 176.3
Area of main steel provided at bottom mm^2 3273.0
Area of steel required at top (Avg depth Considered) mm^2 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0 250.0
Spacing of steel in at top mm 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2 314.2
Area of main steel provided at top mm^2 261.8
Spacing of distribution steel at top & bottom mm 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1 203.1
Area of distribution steel provided at T&B mm^2 565.5
Page 44
PROJECT:
CS RCB
9.7 Design for Shear in Toe Slab of LWL condition
Shear is checked at the crical section i.e. eff. depth distance from the abutment face
Distance of critical section from abutment face m 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91
Effective depth available at critical section mm 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0
Upward force due to Base pr. at critical section KN 7412.6 7669.4 5184.4 7211.3 7286.6 7151.2 5189.9 5897.5 6128.6 4138.6 5778.2 5817.1 5701.3 4143.4 6474.2
c.g. of force from critical section m 1.051 1.052 1.036 1.050 1.050 1.050 1.036 1.056 1.057 1.043 1.055 1.056 1.055 1.043 1.044
Moment due to upward loads KN-m 7792.8 8070.6 5372.6 7570.4 7653.8 7507.3 5378.3 6230.2 6479.8 4317.0 6096.0 6140.0 6014.8 4322.4 6757.8
Moment due to downward loads KN-m 2420.9 2420.9 2420.9 2420.9 2420.9 2420.9 2420.9 1793.2 1793.2 1793.2 1793.2 1793.2 1793.2 1793.2 2420.9
Shear due to Vertical loads at critical section kN 2518.0 2518.0 2518.0 2518.0 2518.0 2518.0 2518.0 1865.1 1865.1 1865.1 1865.1 1865.1 1865.1 1865.1 2518.0
Net Design Moment of Toe KN-m 5371.9 5649.7 2951.7 5149.5 5232.9 5086.4 2957.4 4436.9 4686.5 2523.8 4302.7 4346.7 4221.6 2529.2 4336.9
Slope of varying depth of toe slab radians 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38
Shear resistance without shear reinforcement VRd.c=[0.12*(min((1+sqrt(200/d)),2)*(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33+0.15*σcp]*bw*d where ρ1=(Asl/(bw*d))<=0.02
kN/m
(VRd.c) 376.3
Minimum shear resistance (νRd.c) kN/m VRd.c=(0.031*K^3/2*fck^0.5+0.15*σcp)*bw*d, where K=(1+sqrt(200/d))<=2

339.6
Status OK
9.8 Design for Shear in Toe Slab of HFL condition

Distance of critical section from abutment face m 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91 1.91
Effective depth at critical section mm 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0 1196.0
Upward force due to Base pr. at critical section KN 4832.8 4999.4 2972.6 4724.6 4700.6 4635.0 2973.9 3875.6 4038.1 2399.9 3780.9 3762.8 3706.4 2401.1 4176.1
c.g. of force from Abutment face m 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.03 1.06 1.06 1.03 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.03 1.04
Moment due to upward loads KN-m 5075.4 5256.3 3049.9 4958.9 4938.0 4864.5 3051.3 4092.3 4268.2 2483.2 3990.4 3975.0 3911.7 2484.4 4345.6
Moment due to downward loads KN-m 1193.2 1193.2 1193.2 1193.2 1193.2 1193.2 1193.2 883.9 883.9 883.9 883.9 883.9 883.9 883.9 1193.2
Shear due to Vertical loads at critical section kN 1165.3 1165.3 1165.3 1165.3 1165.3 1165.3 1165.3 863.1 863.1 863.1 863.1 863.1 863.1 863.1 1165.3
Net Design Moment/m of Toe KN-m 3882.2 4063.1 1856.6 3765.7 3744.8 3671.2 1858.1 3208.4 3384.4 1599.3 3106.5 3091.1 3027.9 1600.5 3152.4
Slope of varying depth of toe slab radians 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Status OK
Page 45
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING & STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: LANE OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
10.0 Check for Crack Width & Sresses In Heel & Toe Slab:
10.1 Heel Slab In LWL Condition:

Rare combination Quasi-combination
Description of Item Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9
Base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 209.2 217.3 141.3 204.1 205.8 201.5 141.4 168.0 141.3
Base pressure at B : Pb KN/m^2 197.3 201.4 141.3 184.1 185.1 184.8 141.2 168.0 141.3
Base pressure at C : Pc KN/m^2 186.6 186.9 191.2 190.0 188.5 188.4 191.3 202.5 191.2
Base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 174.7 171.0 191.2 170.1 167.8 171.7 191.0 202.5 191.2
Abutment/Footing width m 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Footing Length m 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4
Heel Length m 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8
Pressure at face of Abutment on Heel side : p1 KN/m^2 185.1 185.1 168.2 176.6 175.8 177.7 168.1 186.6 168.2
Upward force due to Base Pressure kN 10362.0 10255.1 10349.3 9982.7 9895.4 10062.4 10341.8 11206.1 10349.3
CG of force from abutment face on Heel side m 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5
Moment due to upward force kNm 24630.4 24294.4 25376.4 23808.7 23570.9 24019.1 25358.1 27264.4 25376.4
Total downward loads KN 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3 12640.3
Moment due to downward loads kNm 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0 30164.0
Net Design Moment/m of heel kNm/m 461.1 489.1 399.0 529.6 549.4 512.1 400.5 241.6 399.0
Effective depth required mm 339.2 349.3 315.5 363.5 370.2 357.4 316.1 245.5 315.5
Overall depth provided mm 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0 2000.0
Effective depth provided mm 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5
Factor Fav Mpa 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
2
k av = M/Fav*b*d 0.012 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.002
Modular ratio 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45 6.45
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) mm 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) mm 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0
Area of main steel required at top mm^2 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9
Minimum area of main steel required at top mm^2 3000.0 3000.0 3000.0 3000.0 3000.0 3000.0 3000.0 3000.0 3000.0
Area of main steel to be provided at top mm^2 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9 6505.9
Spacing of main steel to be provided at top mm 75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5 75.5
Area of main steel provided at top (mm^2) 3273.0
Area of steel required at bottom mm^2 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0
Spacing of steel required at bottom 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4
Area of steel provided at bottom mm^2 261.8
Area of distribution steel required at T&B mm^2 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0 1200.0
Spacing of distribution steel at T&B mm 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2 94.2
Area of distribution steel provided at T&B mm^2 565
Page 46
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
10.1.1 Calculation of Crack width for Heel Slab In LWL Condition :

Max. crack spacing mm 539.0 539.0 539.0 539.0 539.0 539.0 539.0 539.0 539.0
Moment of inertia of cracked section mm^4 6.35E+10 6.35E+10 6.35E+10 6.35E+10 6.35E+10 6.35E+10 6.35E+10 6.35E+10 6.35E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) Mpa 77.2 81.9 66.8 88.7 92.0 85.8 67.1 40.5 66.8 OK
Stress in concrete(Mpa) Mpa 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.2 2.3 2.1 1.7 1.0 1.7 OK
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0001 0.0002
Crack width Wk (mm) mm 0.125 0.132 0.108 0.143 0.149 0.139 0.108 0.065 0.108 OK
10.2 Heel Slab In HFL Condition: Normal case(HFL) Rare combination Quasi-combination
Description of Item Unit case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8 case 9
Base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 136.4 141.7 79.0 133.4 133.2 131.3 79.1 103.7 79.0
Base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 115.8 112.3 132.4 116.7 116.4 118.6 132.3 142.8 132.4
Footing Length m 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4
Heel Length m 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8
Pressure at face of Abutment on Heel side : p1 KN/m^2 121.1 120.3 107.8 120.9 122.0 122.3 107.7 124.8 107.8
CG of force from abutment face on Heel side m 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5
Moment due to upward force kNm 16255.1 15895.1 17162.7 16334.0 16355.3 16571.2 17157.0 18911.3 17162.7
Total downward loads KN 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5 8412.5
Moment due to downward loads kNm 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2 20017.2
Net Design Moment/m of heel kNm/m 313.5 343.5 237.9 306.9 305.2 287.2 238.4 92.2 237.9
Effective depth provided mm 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5 1912.5
Factor Fav Mpa 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
2
k av = M/Fav*b*d 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) mm 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9 263.9
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) mm 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0 873.0
Area of main steel provided at top(mm^2) 3273
Page 47
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
10.2.1 Calculation of Crack width for Heel Slab In HFL Condition :

(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 0.0002 0.0002 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0001
Crack width Wk mm mm 0.085 0.093 0.064 0.083 0.083 0.078 0.065 0.025 0.064 OK
10.3 Toe Slab In LWL Condition:

Max. base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 209.21 217.32 141.29 204.09 205.81 201.54 141.44 167.97 141.29
Min. base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 174.67 171.02 191.19 170.06 167.80 171.66 191.04 202.52 191.19
Footing Length m 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40
Toe Length m 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Base pressure at face of Abutment on Toe side: p2KN/m^2 200.50 205.62 160.48 198.68 199.16 196.49 160.61 181.26 160.48
c.g. of force from abutment Face m 2.014 2.019 1.958 2.009 2.011 2.009 1.958 1.975 1.958
Moment due to upward loads kN-m 19805.88 20488.77 14178.04 19420 19545.34 19186.50 14191.59 16550.95 14178.04
Moment due to downward loads kN-m 7200.00 7200.00 7200.00 7200.00 7200.00 7200.00 7200.00 7200.00 7200.00
Net Design Moment/m of Toe kN-m/m 1050.49 1107.40 581.51 1018.33 1028.78 998.88 582.64 779.25 581.51
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) mm 264 264 264 264 264 264 264 264 264
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) mm 873 873 873 873 873 873 873 873 873
Effective depth provided mm 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913
Area of main Ast provided at B(mm^2) mm^2 3273
Page 48
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
10.3.1 Calculation of Crack width for Toe Slab In LWL Condition :
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.00053 0.00056 0.00029 0.00051 0.00052 0.00050 0.00029 0.00039 0.00029
Normal
10.4 Toe Slab In HFL Condition: case(HFL)
Max. base pressure at A : Pa KN/m^2 136.35 141.68 79.03 133.41 133.23 131.30 79.06 103.68 79.03
Min. base pressure at D : Pd KN/m^2 115.79 112.33 132.35 116.74 116.39 118.62 132.31 142.82 132.35
Footing Length m 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40 10.40
Toe Length m 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Base pressure at face of Abutment on Toe side: p2KN/m^2 131.96 135.09 99.54 129.98 128.55 128.21 99.56 118.73 99.54
c.g. of force from abutment Face m 2.011 2.016 1.924 2.009 2.012 2.008 1.924 1.955 1.924
Moment due to upward loads kN-m 12949.82 13390.50 8243.43 12697.72 12640.66 12506.41 8246.01 10435.14 8243.43
Moment due to downward loads kN-m 4320.00 4320.00 4320.00 4320.00 4320.00 4320.00 4320.00 4320.00 4320.00
Net Design Moment/m of Toe kN-m/m 719.16 755.88 326.96 698.15 693.39 682.21 327.17 509.60 326.96
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) mm 264 264 264 264 264 264 264 264 264
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) mm 873 873 873 873 873 873 873 873 873
Effective depth provided mm 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913 1913
Area of main steel provided at B(mm^2) mm^2 3273
10.3.2 Calculation of Crack width for Toe Slab In HFL Condition :
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.00036 0.00038 0.00016 0.00035 0.00035 0.00034 0.00016 0.00026 0.00016
Page 49
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING & STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: OF THE ROAD FROM GUNDLAPALLY (HKR) TO POTHUR VIA KONDAPUR & GANNERUVARAM FROM KM
0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT. R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
11.0 Design of Solid Return wall
0.000 m 4.800 m
A B
0.50
0.500
x dx
9.345 m
(Avg)
Y direction
X direction B'
A'
Width of Solid Return a = 4.800 m Width of Cantilever Return = 0.000 m

Height of solid return near shaft face = 8.595 m Height of Cantilever Return at tip = 0.500 m
Height of solid return at farther end = 10.095 m Height of Cantilever Return (Taper section)= 0.000 m
Avg. Heigth of Solid Return b = 9.345 m Total ht. of Cantilever Return at support = 0.500 m
Thickness of Cantilever Return wall = 0.500 m
Grade of Concrete = M 30 Clear cover to steel = 50 mm

Coeff.of Active Earth Pressure 'Ka' = 0.284 Unit weight of soil = 20 kN/m^3
Thickness of Solid Return at farther end = 0.500 m Thickness of Solid Return at bottom = 0.600 m
Thickness of Solid Return at Root = 0.500 m Thickness of Solid Return at top = 0.500 m
For design of return wall Load case 11.a & 11.d and their formulae given by Roark have been used.
11.1 For uniformally distributed load over entire plate From Table 11.a
Here, a/b = 0.514 For a/b = 0.500 b1 = 0.631 b2 = 0.632

For a/b = 0.750 b1 = 1.246 b2 = 1.186
For, a/b = 0.514 b1 = 0.665

b2 = 0.662
Live load surcharge :
2
q = 0.284 x 20 x 1.200 = 6.813 kN/m
Max. sb = b1 x q x b2
t12
sa = b2 x q x b2
t22
sb = 0.665 x 6.813 x 87.329 = 1098.375 kN/m2

0.360 = 1.098 MPa
3
For 1000 mm width, Z = 1000 x 360000 = 6.00E+07 mm
6
Page 50
CS RCB
Moment /m width along Y direction:

My /m width = 1.098 x 6.00E+07 = 6.59E+07 Nmm/m
= 65.902 kN.m/m
sa = 0.662 x 6.813 x 87.329 = 1094.526

0.360 = 1.095 MPa
3
For 1000 mm of height , Z = 1000 x 360000 = 6.0E+07 mm
6
Moment /m height along X direction:
Mx /m height = 1.095 x 6.0E+07 = 6.57E+07 Nmm/m
= 65.672 kN.m/m
11.2 For triangular loading due to Earth Pressure 'Refer Load case No. 11 d From Table 11.a
a/b = 0.514 For a/b = 0.500 b1 = 0.328 b2 = 0.200

For a/b = 0.750 b1 = 0.537 b2 = 0.276
For, a/b = 0.514 b1 = 0.339

b2 = 0.204
2
q = 0.284 x 20 x 9.345 = 53.059 kN/m
Max. sb = b1 x q x b2
t12
sa = b2 x q x b2
t22
2
sb = 0.339 x 53.059 x 87.329 = 4368.496 kN/m
0.360 = 4.368 MPa
3
6
Moment /m width along Y direction:
My /m width = 4.368 x 6.00E+07 = 2.62E+08 Nmm/m

= 262.110 kN.m/m
sa = 0.204 x 53.059 x 87.329 = 2627.585

0.360 = 2.628 MPa
3
6
Moment /m height along X direction:
Mx /m height = 2.628 x 6.0E+07 = 1.58E+08 Nmm/m

= 157.655 kN.m/m
Page 51
CS RCB
11.3 DESIGN OF SOLID RETURN
11.3.1 Moment due to Cantilever Return
Moment due to earth pressure at face B - B'
= 0.284 x 1.200 x 20.000 x 0.500 x 0.000 x 4.800 +

+ 0.500 x 0.284 x 20.000 x 0.500 x 0.500 x 0.000 x 4.800
+ 0.500 x 0.284 x 20.000 x 0.444 x X2 x dx ( 4.800 -X )
+ 0.284 x 20.000 x 1.700 x 0.667 x X x dx ( 4.800 -X )
= 0.002 + 0.000 + 1.262 x 0.000 + 6.435 x 0.000

= 0.002 + 0.000 + 0.000 + 0.000
= 0.002 + 0.000
L.L Surchage Earth Pressure
Moment in Solid Return /m height = 65.672 + 157.655 + 0.002 / 10.095 + 0.000 / 10.095
(including Cantilever moment)
= 65.672 + 157.655 + 0.000 + 0.000
Moment in Solid Return /m width = 65.902 + 262.1 = 328.012 kN.m / m
Moment in Solid Return /m height 315 236 315 236 236 315 315 171 210 158
Moment in Solid Return /m width 472 341 472 341 341 472 472 275 315 262
11.3.2 Design of Face BB'
Moment in Solid Return /m height = = 315.289 kN.m / m
Effective depth available = 600 -50 -25 -10 = 515 mm
2
Moment of Resistance = Rulim x b x d
= 4.008 x 1000 x 265225 = 1063084883 N.mm

= 1063.085 kN.m OK
Fav = 10.72
Factor β = (λ/2) = 0.4
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 = 0.111
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) = 60 mm
Limiting Neutral axis depth (xlim) = 235 mm
2
Area of steel required / m = 1479 mm /m
Min area of tension steel required (IRC : 112
clause 16.5.1) ) = Max((0.26*(fctm/fyk)*b*d),(0.0013*b*d)) = 670 mm2/m
ALONG HORIZONTAL DIRECTION

2
Provide 20mm dia bars @ 150mm c/c. (Ast provided = 2094 mm on earth face. OK
2
Provide 12mm dia bars @ 150mm c/c. (Ast provided = 754 mm on other face. OK

Moment in Solid Return /m height kNm/m 210.2 157.7
Area of main steel provided on earth face mm2 2094.4 2094.4

rr.eff 0.0099 0.0099
(esm-ecm) 0.0006 0.0005
O.K O.K
11.3.3 Design for Face A'B'
Moment in Solid Return /m width = = 472.25 kN.m / m
Effective depth available = 600 -50 -13 = 537.50 mm
Moment of Resistance = Rulim x b x d2

= 4.008 x 1000 x 288906 = 1158004965 N.mm/m
= 1158.005 kN.m/m OK
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 = 0.152
2
Max((0.26*(fctm/fyk)*b*d),(0.0013*b*d)) 699 mm2/m
clause 16.5.1) ) = =
ALONG VERTICAL DIRECTION
2
2
Page 52
CS RCB

Moment in Solid Return /m width kNm/m 314.8 262.1
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.10 0.08
rr.eff 0.0209 0.0209
(esm-ecm) 0.0006 0.0005
O.K O.K
Page 53
CS RCB
11.4 Moment due to Cantilever Return
Moment due to earth pressure at face A - A'
= 0.284 x 1.200 x 20.000 x 0.500 x 0.000 x 0.000 +

+ 0.500 x 0.284 x 20.000 x 0.500 x 0.500 x 0.000 x 0.000
+ 0.500 x 0.284 x 20.000 x 0.444 x X2 x dx ( 0.000 -X )
+ 0.284 x 20.000 x 1.700 x 0.667 x X x dx ( 0.000 -X )
= 0.000 + 0.000 + 1.262 x 0.000 + 6.435 x 0.000

= 0.000 + 0.000 + 0.000 + 0.000
= 0.000 kN.m
Moment in cantilever Return /m height 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cantilever Moment at A-A = = 0.000 kN.m
Effective depth available = 500 -50 -6.0 = 444 mm
2
Moment of Resistance = Rulim x b x d
= 4.008 x 1000 x 197136 = 790167976 N.mm

= 790.168 kN.m OK
Fav = 10.72
Factor β = (λ/2) = 0.4
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 = 0.000
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) = 1.00 mm
2
=
clause 16.5.1) ) Max((0.26*(fctm/fyk)*b*d),(0.0013*b*d)) = 577 mm2/m
ALONG HORIZONTAL DIRECTION

2
2

Moment in Solid Return /m width kNm/m 0.0 0.0
Factor β = (λ/2) 0.40 0.40
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 0.00 0.00
rr.eff 0.0054 0.0054
(esm-ecm) 0.0000 0.0000
O.K O.K
This return will also bend in a vertical plane due to its self wt.
Mx = 0.5 X ( 0.5 + 0.500 ) x 0.000 x 0.50 x 25 x 0.00
Mx = 0.5 X ( 1.000 ) x 0.000 = 0.000 kN.m
Moment due to crash barrier = 0.000 x 8 x 0.000 = 0.000 kN.m
Total moment at vertical plane = 0.000 + 0.000 + 0.000 = 0.000 kN.m
Check for effective depth
0 = 4.008 x 500 x d ^2
d ^2 = 0 = 0
4.008 x 500
d = 0.007 mm < 413.1 mm (Hence OK)
Adopting steel bars Dia. 12 mm and clear cover of 50 mm.
Page 54
CS RCB
provide reinforcement at top in two layers
Available effective depth = 500.07 -50 -12 -25
= 413.07 mm
Fav = 10.72
Factor β = (λ/2) = 0.4
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 = 0.000
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) = 1.00 mm
Area of steel required / m = 24.7 mm2/m
b = 500 mm
d = 457 mm
Min area of tension steel required (IRC : 112 clause 16.5.1) ) = Max((0.26*(fctm/fyk)*b*d),(0.0013*b*d)) = 297 mm2
Governing steel at top of cantilever return = 297 mm^2
Provide 6 bars of 10 mm dia at top face in two layers. ( Providing = 471 mm^2 ) O.K
Provide 4 bars of 10 mm dia at bottom in sloping face. ( Providing = 314 mm^2 )
Page 55
PREPERATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR "WIDENING
& STRENGTHENING TO DOUBLE LANE OF THE ROAD FROM DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
GANNERUVARAM FROM KM 0/0 TO 21/0 IN KARIMNAGAR
CS RCB
12.0 Design of Dirt Wall
12.1 Design Data:
Thickness of Dirt Wall = 0.400 m

Approach Slab Thickness = 0.300 m
Depth of Superstructure = 1.900 m
Thickness of ( Bearing + Pedestal + Camber + W.C ) = 0.361 m
Height of Dirt Wall = 2.411 m
12.2 Concrete Design Parameters
Clear Cover ( c ) = 75 mm
Modular Ratio ( m ) = 10
Concrete design mix strength = 30 MPa
Unit weight of concrete = 25 KN/m3
Grade of steel ("m" for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD) = t
Charcteristic strength of steel ( Fy ) = 500 Mpa
12.3 Soil Parameters
Rankines or Coulumbs ("r" or "c")? = c

Angle of Repose of Soil, f (in degrees) f = 30.0 Coulumbs
2
Cohesion, C (in t/m ) C = 0.0
Angle of Wall friction d = 20.0
Bulk Density of Soil g = 20.0
Equiv. Ht. of backfill earth for Live load surcharge heb = 1.2
Batter of Dirt wall with horizontal a = 90.0
Inclination of Backfill with horizontal b = 0.000
Active Earth pressure Coefficient Ka = 0.297
Active Earth pressure Coefficient ( Horizontal ) Kah = 0.279
Active Earth pressure Coefficient ( Vertical ) Kav = 0.102
0.4
0.3
2.411 1.0555 0.887

2.111
P1
P2
1.2 Ka g Ka g h
12.4 Slenderness of Dirt Wall
Height of Dirt Wall = 2.411 m

Effective Height of Dirt Wall = 1.2x2.411 = 2.8932 m
Thickness of Dirt Wall ( t ) = 0.4 m
Least Radious of Gyration = t/sqrt(12) = 0.115 m
Ratio of effective Height to Least Radious of Gyration = 25.056 m
Type of Column = Short Column
Page 56
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
12.5 Loads & Moments
Height of Dirt Wall below Approach Slab in contact with Earth = h say
Hence, h = ( 2.411 ) m
= 2.411 m
# Load 1
Earth Pressure developed due to surcharge of equivalent height of 1.2 mts is " P1 " say.
Hence, P1 = 1.2 Kah g = 1.2 x 0.2794 x 20
2
= 6.71 kn / m
Vertical Load = Kav g h = 1.2 x 0.1017 x 20

2
= 2.44 kn / m
Eccentricity of Load wrt Dirt Wall base is " h1 " say
Hence, h1 = 2.411 / 2 = 1.2055 m
# Load 2
Earth Pressure developed due to earth behind the Dirt Wall is " P2 " say.
Hence. P2 = Kah g h = 0.28 x 20 x 2.411

2
= 13.47 kn / m
Vertical Load = Kav g h = 0.102 x 20 x 2.411

2
= 4.90 kn / m
Eccentricity of Load wrt Dirt Wall base is " h2 " say
Hence, h2 = 0.42 x 2.411 = 1.01262 m
# Load 3
Vertical Load due to self weight of Dirt Wall is " P3 " say.
Hence. P3 = 0.4 x 2.411 x 25 = 24.11 kn/m run
Summary
Vertical Horizontal Force

Load Cases Description Loads Loads Eccentricity Moment
2
Kn/m width kn / m m kn - m
# Load 1 P1 2.44 6.71 1.2055 8.083
# Load 2 P2 4.90 13.47 1.01262 16.445
# Load 3 P3 24.11 0.00 0.000 0.000
31.45 20.18 24.53
Page 57
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
12.6 Load and Moment due Live Load
The Live Load moment shall be maximum when the 40 T bogie Load is placed on the Dirt wall
Edge of C/Barrier 100 100
2.13 1.93
Effective Width = 6.471 m

Dirt Wall
2.411
Height
Effective Width
Total Load on Dirt Wall = 200 KN

= 30.91 KN / m width
Total Braking Force = 20 % of load on Dirt Wall
= 40 kN
Braking Force / mts width of the Dirt Wall = 40 / 6.471 kN / m width
= 6.18 kN / m width
Impact Factor = 1.5
Shear Due Live Load = 1.5 x 6.19 kN m / m width

= 9.27 kN m / m width
Moment Due Live Load = (2.411 ) x 9.28 kN - m / m width

= 22.36 kn - m / m width

Ultimate Limit State:
Basic Combination:
Case:1 Earth Pressure as a Leading Load L.F
Normal case EP leading condition 1.5
Live load is Accompanying Load 1.15
Case:2 Live Load as a Leading Load
Normal case LL leading condition 1.5
Earth Pressure is Accompanying Load 1.0
Moment Due to Horizontal Force
Case:1 60.08 kn - m / m width
Case:2 59.68 kn - m / m width
Page 58
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
12.7 Design of Dirt Wall as Cantilever Beam
Diameter of main reinforcement = 12 mm

Spacing of main reinforcement = 150 mm
Diameter of main reinforcement on other face of earth = 10 mm
Spacing of main reinforcement on other face of earth = 200 mm
Diameter of distribution reinforcement = 10 mm
Spacing of distribution reinforcement = 200 mm
Factor Fav = 10.72

Factor β = (λ/2) = 0.4
k av = M/Fav*b*d2 = 0.055
12.7.1 Check for Flexure as per IRC:112-2011
Depth Mdes Deff reqd. Doverall Deff provd. (mm) Ast Min. Ast Ast reqd. Ast provd. Status
from top (KN.m) (mm) provd. (mm2/m) (mm2/m) (mm2/m) (mm2/m)
(m) (mm)
2.411 60.08 195.49 400 319.00 443.81 414.7 443.81 753.98 OK
Provide 12 mm diameter bars at 150 mm spacing in earth face
Area of steel provided on other face of earth = 392.70 mm2/m OK
Provide 10 mm diameter bars at 200 mm spacing in other earth face
- Distribution Steel (Clause 16.3.2 of IRC:112 - 2011)
Depth from Ast reqd. Ast provd.

top of earth Status
fill (m) (mm2/m) (mm2/m)
2.411 200.00 392.70 OK
Provide 10 mm diameter bars at 200 mm spacing as distribution steel on both face
12.8 Design of Dirt Wall as Column
Check for Compression Stress
Vertical Horizontal Force

Load Type Loads Loads Moment
Kn/m width kn / m2 kn - m
DL+EP+LL 86.74 60.08
Thickness of Dirt Wall = 0.4 m

Width of Dirt Wall = 1 m
2
Area = 0.4 m
3
Section Modulus = 0.026667 m
Compression ( Max ) = P/A + M/Z = 86.74/0.4 + 60.08/0.027

2.47 N/mm2 OK
Page 59
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
13.0 Design of Abutment Cap
13.1 Design of Abutment Cap in Longitudinal direction supporting dirt wall:
Total load on dirt wall = = 200 KN

Dispersion width = = 6.471 m
Load of CWLL /m width of dirt wall = = 30.91 KN/m width
Weight of dirt wall = = 24.11 KN/m
Total Load from dirt wall = 55.02 KN/m
Dist. From centre of dirt wall to face = = 0.020 m
Moment at the face of cap = = 1.11 KNm
Effective depth required = = 29 mm
Total depth provided = = 600 mm

Effective depth provided = = 519 mm
Factor Fav = = 10.72

Factor β = (λ/2) = = 0.4
2
k av = M/Fav*b*d = = 0.000
Neutral Axis Depth (mm) = = 1.00 mm
Area of steel required = = 24.7 mm^2
Min area of tension steel required

(IRC : 112 clause 16.5.1) ) = Max((0.26*(fctm/fyk)*b*d),(0.0013*b*d)) = 675 mm2/m
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c at top and bottom in long. direction. (Ast = 1341 mm^2)
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c at top and bottom in trans. direction. (Ast = 1341 mm^2)
13.1 Design of Abutment Cap in Transverse direction:
As the RCC bed block is fully supported on the Abutment, minimum thickness of the bed block required as per cl. 710.8.2 of IRC : 78-
2000 is 200 mm. However the thickness of bed block is kept as 300 mm. For design purpose, assume a bed block thickness of 200 mm
1420
300
Abut Cap
300
3
Volume of Abutment cap = 200 x 1420 x 12000 = 3.41E+09 mm
(As per cl 710.8.2 of IRC : 78 - 2000 )
3
Quantity of steel = 1.00 % of volume = 34080000 mm
3
Steel to be provided at top = 34080000 / 2 = 17040000 mm
3
Steel to be provided at bottom = 34080000 / 2 = 17040000 mm
Page 60
PROJECT:
R&B/STR/MJB/16+785/DC/201 18.04.23
CS RCB
13.2 Steel on Top Face of Abutment Cap
13.2.1 Longitudnal steel
3
Qty of steel to be provided in long dir = ( 0.5 x total steel at top ) = 8520000 mm
Clear cover of = = 40 mm
Length of bar = 1420 - 2 x 40 = 1340 mm
2
Area of steel required in long dir = 8520000 / 1340 = 6359 mm
2
Ast / m width = 6359 / 12 = 530 mm
2
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c in longitudinal direction at top. (Ast = 1340 mm ) OK
13.2.2 Transverse steel
Qty of steel to be provided in trans dir = ( 0.5 x total steel at top ) = 8520000 mm3
Clear cover of = = 75 mm
Length of bar = 12000 - 2 x 75 = 11850 mm
2
Area of steel required in trans dir = 8520000 / 11850 = 719 mm
2
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c in transverse direction at top. (Ast = 1340 mm ) OK
Provide the same longitudinal and tranverse steel at bottom also.
Page 61

MJB 16+785 DC 201 Abut

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

MJB 16+785 DC 201 Abut

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

This document is the property of Sheladia Associates, INC must not be passed on to any third person or firm not

authorised by us, nor be copied/made use of in full or part by such person

18.04.23 0 INITIAL SUBMISSION CS RCB -

SHELADIA ASSOCIATES INC

TOTAL NO. OF PAGES TITLE :

CHKD RCB 18.04.23

RELEASED FOR PRELIMINARY TENDER INFORMATION APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION

Sl. No. Item Description Page

1.0 Design Data 1

2.0 Load Calculations 4

3.0 Carriageway Live Load Calculations 12

4.0 Horizontal Force Calculations 16

6.0 Wind load 17

7.0 Stability Checks for Different Load Cases 19

8.0 Design of Abutment Shaft 25

Biaxial Stress Check 31

9.0 Design of Heel and Toe Slab 34

10.0 Crack width calculations 40

11.0 Design of Solid Return Wall 43

12.0 Design of Dirt Wall 53

13.0 Design of Abutment Cap 57

1.0 Span Arrangement

Span Arrangement (c/c of bearing) = 4 x 19.000 m

Projection of deck beyond c/l of brg = 0.480 m (Square)

Skew Angle = 0.00 Deg = 0.000 radians

1.1 Reduced Levels

FRL near crash barrier / median edge = 291.120 m

Abutment Shaft Abutment Cap

Solid Return Wall Cantilever Wall

Total Base Width = 10.400 m Total Base Length = 12.000 m

Radius of Curvature = 900 m Design speed of the vehicle = 100 kmph

Number of bearings at abutment = 5

1.3 Loads and Forces from Superstructure

Dead Load Reaction = 1800.00 kN Trans. Ecc. of DL = 0.000 m

Type of Bearing ("t" for Tar Paper, = e

congestion factor as per IRC:6 2014 = 1.150

Angle of Repose of Soil f = 30.00 Degree

Height of Water Table above foundation Hwt = 0.0 m

Batter of Stem wall with vertical a = 4.05 Degree

Equiv. Ht. of backfill for Live load surcharge heb = 1.20 m

Unit weight of Soil (dry) gb = 20.00 kN/m^3

Active Earth pressure Coefficient for Stability Ka = 0.279

Passive Earth pressure Coefficient for Stability Kp = 0.000

Seismic earth pressure For Minimum Case

1.6 Seismic Load

Zone Factor = 0.10

a = 0.67 A2.10 Page : 244 (IRC:112-2011)

Limiting Neutral Axis Depth x lim = (d * єcu3) / (єs + єcu3) = 0.456 * d

1.8.1.1 Deck Dimensions:

1.8.1.2 Longitudinal Girders:-

Thickness of girders at mid span = 0.325 m ; Thickness of girders at support = 0.625 m

1.8.1.3 Cross Girders:

1.8.1.4 Material properties:

1.1875 0.625 1.1875 1.3375 0.325 1.3375

0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225

Section Width Height A SA Section Width Height A SA

0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225 0.225

Section Width Height A SA Section Width Height A SA

C/L of Exp. Jt. C/L of Brg.

0.000 0.500 1.500 m 2.000 m

Wt of Int. X-Girder on Outer Girder = (1-0.325 )/2*1.425*0.3*25 = 3.70 7.40 KN

Outer Girder Inner Girder

Wt of Int. X-Girder on Outer Girder = (1-0.325 )/21.4250.3*25 = 3.70 7.40 KN