Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stefano Piantino, Japanese Material Culture Final Paper, Driving Backwards - Japanese Car Design and Showa Nostalgia
Stefano Piantino, Japanese Material Culture Final Paper, Driving Backwards - Japanese Car Design and Showa Nostalgia
0. Introduction
In this study, I will try to investigate the nature of two objects1, their historical and social
meaning, and the impact they might be having on Japanese society, specifically in terms of
consumption of goods and capitalistic market. The two objects I am referring to are two
acquisition/consumption, the Japanese kei car, and the other as an object utilized to provide
a service, a specific type of taxi that can be seen in the metropolitan area of Tokyo, to which
I will refer as retro taxi. I premise that I never had any interest in cars, on the contrary, I must
admit that I have always felt a repulsion towards motor vehicles in general. I tend to find
cars per se a shallow matter, to which society tends to grant too much importance. I also think
they can become harmful objects when, from an individual perspective, they transit to a net
privilege, and social status. I am nevertheless inclined to believe that the objects we refuse to
analyze, criticize or look at due to their being unappealing are the most perilous ones, and
threaten to furtively pull the strings of our lives and control our desires and cravings. This is
why I will try to venture deeper into a matter I have never before taken into consideration,
I will try to prove that both these objects and their fortune might be partially linked to
their design and how this can trigger a specific type of emotion. I believe, in fact, that the
emotional responses of buyers to the aesthetics of these cars could be related to Showa
1 Mainly aesthetically.
century due to the immense popularity of media and cultural products» (Hidaka 2017, 6). It
has been proven by numerous studies that object stimulate emotional responses in human
beings and that the production design of goods is often shaped by the response that they are
likely to cause in potential customers. Therefore, I would like to argue that the fortune of
some kei cars could also be due (beyond, as stated by many sources, to their «spaciousness
and overall performance» (Nunn 2005)) to their aesthetic rewriting of Showa design features,
and that the choice of the vehicles employed to deliver passenger services in big cities might
The kei car (or 軽自動車 – keijidōsha, "light car/vehicle") is the Japanese vehicle category
for the smallest passenger cars. It is also elsewhere called Japanese city car or Japanese microcar,
and «it is limited in length, width, engine size, and horsepower» (Garrett 2007). It could be
conceptually compared to a European A-segment car, or city car, and similar categories exist for
microvans (and kei trucks). Kei cars come in various types of shapes (figure 1), but, in this
paper, I will concentrate on a peculiarly looking type of kei car, one of the most diffused, the
box-like or cubic-looking ones, among which I will select the second generation of Honda
The original Honda N-Box was launched in 2011, while the second generation was
unveiled by Honda on the 25 of May 2017 and launched in Japan in the August of the same
year. It then went on sale approximately one month later. The dimensions of the vehicle are
339cm in length, 147cm in width, and 175cm in height. It can be bought in several different
colors, I will here refer to the ochre and the white models (figures 2; 3). The interior of the
2 Or, at least, that a choice of “persistence” in these canons might be influenced, even not deliberately, by
Showa Nostalgia.
2
car is rather spacious, mostly due to its height, to the proportion between this and its width
and length, and to the lines of the body of the vehicle, which rather than being curved are
rigid and straight, with angles and junctions that resemble rounded right angles. It can fit up
to four people, the trunk does not have a considerable extension in terms of length, but can
still fit approximately two suitcases, and the rear seats can be folded down in order to obtain
more loading space (figure 7). The front area is rather ordinary, there is a digital screen to
control the GPS, audio, and other settings, but both the speedometer and the fuel gauge are
analog, the driving wheel is positioned on the right and there are several air-conditioning
vents, both on the side of the passenger and that of the driver (figures 4; 6; 8).
The exterior is probably the element presenting the features that are most crucial in this
analysis, and it determines a lot in terms of aesthetics. It might be stated that this kind of
model has a rather “clumsy” (and not really aerodynamic), unproportioned, funny shape for
our days. As I stated above, the straight, right lines and angles of this type of car are pretty
characteristic and peculiar, and the same goes for the proportions among its parts, which are
rather unusual. The bonnet section is extremely short compared to the rest of the car, and
the whole body, to the sight, results roughly divided into two main sections: a smaller,
shorter, and more compressed parallelepiped/cube (the front or bonnet section), and a bulky,
elongated, compact, unitary second box, dedicated to hosting the passenger seats and the
trunk (figures 2; 1; 6). The most significant vertical lines, if we look at the car by its profile,
consist of the trunk door, the bumper section, and, maybe most crucially, the windshield,
which is also the line that connects the two parallelepipeds or boxes that compose the overall
visual appearance of this object. What I want to point out here is that these three lines,
common in modern-looking cars (figure 12), are steep and rather vertical, closer to a
perpendicular line than a diagonal. They fall or rise suddenly on other rather straight, non-
3
soft lines, like that of the bonnet and that of the roof. All of this contributes to rendering a
rigid, squared profile, a general shape reducible or divisible in smaller, non-curvilinear, simple
polygons. It can also provide the impression of the presence of two different rectangular
bodies/boxes in terms of height, a longer one below, out of which, due to the “harsh” lines,
a second, shorter (in length) box seems to come out of or detach from (figure 2). Other
important features to point out are the shape and sizes of the windshield, which covers the
largest possible, rigorously rectangular section of the front, non-significantly curved in its
width and height (same goes for the rear window), and the side windows, large and regular
in shape, squared. Both the front and the taillights have a squared form, quite distant from
the elaborated, composite shapes of most cars that crowd European streets (figures 2; 3; 5).
Finally, the vertical junctions (i.e., between the body and the windows) are kept as thin and
invisible as possible, and there are not many metal-colored components to be spotted,
especially in the front bumper section, most of the components are kept in the same color
of the body or in black, even the grid in front of the radiator, that often does not display the
same color as the rest of the body (and is instead yellow here, figure 3).
The type of vehicle I am referring to in this paragraph is one of the models of taxis
mostly spread in Japan. I personally was able to witness the presence of huge numbers of
this type of car in the center of Tokyo and in Okinawa, mostly in Naha. The model is not
always the same, but I will try to give a description of the most significant shared features of
the vehicles that I am generally grouping under the name and category of Japanese retro taxi. I
will largely resort to the examples displayed in the pictures, but a specific model of car largely
used in Tokyo3 to provide this kind of service is the Toyota Crown Comfort or Toyota
3 And famously, since several series of models have been produced, i.e., the Tomica TLVN Toyota Crown
Tokyo Musen Taxi, in the two famous colors, green/yellow and black.
4
Crown Sedan (figures 9; 10; 11). This type of vehicle presents a vintage-looking (mostly due
to the rigid, non-aerodynamic shape, not suitable for contemporary, sporty cars), elongated
body, divisible in three sections longitudinally. The first and the last are lower in height and
present straight lines, with pronounced, visible, and almost right angles. The bonnet section
is usually longer than the trunk section, and their similarly low and slightly descending shape
concurs in giving an even stronger impression of elongation. In the center, due to the always
pronounced, harsh angles and the non-curvilinear profiles and lines (especially those of
separation), a taller parallelepiped seems to come out, almost abruptly detached from the rest
of the body, since the connecting lines do not concur in forming a harmonious, smooth,
curved, or soft junction. The colors are often limited to black, white and the famous
green/yellow design (figure 10). Interestingly, the mirrors are often detached from the central
section and positioned on the bonnet (figures 9; 10), giving and even stronger retro look.
The junctions between the mirrors and the body are very thin, and often highlighted by
metal-colored particulars or lines, the windows themselves are big and rather squared. The
taillights and front lights are also rectangular, with a simple rather than composite shape. The
aperture and shape of the trunk are curious and not common, almost outdated, today, the
loading space extends in length rather than in height, and the door covers part of both the
horizontal and vertical sides, presenting a rounded, almost right angle. The most considerable
difference of the Okinawan variant of this type of taxi is the color: white, blue, or green, the
most diffused and famous version being a white and blue vehicle with a retro-looking
3. History, histories
Before reaching a conclusion, and trying to give an interpretation of the nature and
power of these objects, the messages they inadvertently deliver, and the control they can
5
have on people, and in order to more effectively do so, I would like to take into consideration
It is important to highlight that the Kei car category was created by the Japanese
government in 1949, right after the end of the second world war and in the middle of the
Showa era, in a moment of national, political, and economic uncertainty, when most Japanese
could not afford a full-sized car, and many had just enough money to buy a motorcycle. This
type of car and legal standards originated to help the people and the economy, specifically,
to promote growth in the car industry, as well as to provide alternative delivery methods to
shop owners, small businesses, and entrepreneurs, and its “life” and diffusion covered the
span of the most intense economic growth period of Japan. There have been different
regulations establishing a maximum size, power output, and engine performance in order for
owners to benefit both in terms of taxes and insurance. Originally limited to only 150 ccs (or
100 ccs for two-stroke) before 1950, engine and size limitations were gradually softened
(1950-1955) to tempt more manufacturers to produce these models. The class of vehicle
became increasingly popular, arriving at one of its peaks in 1970 when 750,000 kei cars were
sold. In the 70s, the benefits were eroded by some legislations, and sales suffered to the
extent that many producers insisted that the government took action to make these models
more sellable again. This seemed to have worked as in the 1980s sales went over 700,000
Furthermore, looking at the market it is easily understandable how much kei cars are a
manufacturer that has never offered a kei-sized model either for commercial or private
owners. Nearly all kei cars have been designed and manufactured in Japan. It is also fruitful
to compare the success kei cars had in Japan to their exportation attempts: «the genre is too
6
specialised and too unprofitable for export markets» (Rees 1995, 79), and too small as well4.
It is not difficult to understand why some might regard them as part of a cultural identity
In the case of the second category of vehicles, what I have called retro taxis, tracing a
history is a more difficult task, the category being less well defined. This is why I will limit
my considerations to the Toyota Crown Comfort case. On the website of Toyota Global, we
can read that, «launched in December 1995, the Crown Comfort sedan was primarily
developed for use as medium-sized taxis and driving school cars» (Toyota 2022). Its name
comes from the long-running, famous Toyota Crown, which started to be produced in Japan
right after WWII, in 1955. Very interestingly, even if it “sprouted out” of the Crown model,
after its launch the Crown Comfort did not follow the aesthetic evolution and modernization
process of the Crown, which in the eleventh and twelfth, and most effectively in the
thirteenth generation (1999, 2003, 2008 figures 17; 18; 19) already looked completely
different from a 1900s car, now presenting aerodynamic structure, smooth and curved lines,
and surfaces (windshield included) all around the body, seamless connections between those
that before could be called “boxes” or “parallelepipeds”, and bulkier junctions, resulting in
more rounded, smaller, sometimes trapezoidal windows. The appearance of the Crown
Comfort never changed significantly, and, instead, its retro-looking appearance granted huge
fortune. In 2008, the model won the Good Design Award in the long-life design award
category (Toyota 2022). In 2010, the Crown Comfort was given the “President Prize” by
Akio Toyoda (president of Toyota, corporate award): «the car itself is unspectacular5 but it is
very important to Toyota. This is why Morizo chose the car for the first “Morizo award”,
[…] the car can be driven over the years by everybody from beginners to experts. And this
4 Relevant exceptions exist, however, for example the Suzuki Alto and Daihatsu Cuore, which were
exported consistently from around 1980, probably managing to fit both inside this category and others.
5 I believe particular attention must be given to this particular passage.
7
is the proof that the car is the symbol of Toyota's quality, durability and reliability» (Koh
2011). It is easy to see how this model has been turned into a symbol and has been awarded
basically for representing a shared element in the lives of the “common people” of Japan
from the previous century on. In this kind of tone and dialectic, it is not difficult to spot a
nostalgic inclination and the tendency to recognize, present, and see this model of car, and
in a semantically wider sense, the Crown Comfort taxi or retro taxi as a topical and identarian
Kansei is a Japanese word that can be translated as «feelings, images, emotions, affection,
sense or impression» (Sutono, et al. 2016, 1). Kansei Engineering defines a methodology
«which unites Kansei with the engineering discipline, a field where the development of
products that bring happiness and satisfaction to human beings is performed technologically
by analyzing human emotions and incorporating them into the product design» (Sutono, et
al. 2016, 1). The main aim of this process is to offer a prediction (using models obtained
from the relationship between consumers’ kansei and product form features) bound to
generate an optimal design solution for a final product (Desmet, et al. 2021; Sutono, et al.
It is possible to evince from numerous studies that the design of the appearance of a car
in a car company is, in Japan, a long and carefully studied process, in which many different
paths are evaluated (Eguchi e Okada 2010). In addition to this, «in terms of Kansei/affective
engineering, it has been proven that research in Japan» was present since «the 1970s on [the]
engineering». Then, «in the 1980s the method spread rapidly in the Japanese car industry and
6 And that, as such, ought to be recognized and praised in the same way by any truly Japanese person or
any individual that has lived in the last decades of the 20th century.
8
in 1986, Yamamoto, the president of Mazda, coined the technique “Kansei engineering”
when he gave lectures about “car culture” at Michigan University. At this lecture he suggested
to apply Kansei engineering in car design (Lee 1992). Under this term the methodology
spread to Western industry» (Dahlgaard, Schutte e Ayas 2008, 301). It is not misleading, then,
to state that producers are not unaware of the images, implicit cues and meanings inbuilt or
embedded in objects. Sometimes the references are not concealed at all: the N of Honda N-
Box was previously used for the late 1960s and 1970s Honda N360 (figure 14), one of the
most iconic and famous kei cars of the Showa period (crucially famous, and released on a very
If we analyze the aesthetic appearance and design of the cars of the Showa period, we
will be able to recognize a great number of features that were present in the descriptions I
have made above7: the body visibly divided into separate sections not harmoniously
connected, a central taller “box” emerging from a shorter cubic form, the straight, steep,
non-curved lines, the almost right, rounded angles, the wide uncurved windshield, squared
as the windows, the thin junctions, the rectangular lights8 (figures 13; 14; 15; 16). In a big
number of these cars (as in the retro taxis), the shape was incredibly elongated, and this
impression was strongly rendered by the “disproportion” of a short (in length) and taller
central parallelepiped, placed between two short, considerably long ends. All these elements
are foreign to the turns taken in car design (especially in Europe and in the USA) since the
last years of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. These changes are mostly due to
aerodynamics and to the attempt to render a younger, sportier, futuristic look, that often
refuses harsh lines and opts for more composite solutions (figure 13).
7 Even if, in general, «Japanese car designers prefer the “decelerating” curve like a parabola». And «Italian
car designers prefer the “accelerating” curve as a C curve consisting of a straight-line of “gradient” -1» (Harada,
Yoshimoto e Moriyama 1999).
8 It must be noted how, as far as modern kei cars are concerned, the similitudes ought to be found especially
9
«Emotions involve appraisals or evaluations», and «people are emotional beings and
products can address [their] emotions in multiple ways» (Noor e Hashim 2020, 6). These
ways include, consciously or not, images, values, and emotions coming from past experience:
as proved by the Schematic Model Of Aesthetic Experience by Leder, Belke, Oeberst and Augustin
(Leder, et al. 2004), the observer of a work of art starts the perceptual analysis of the work,
comparing it to previous encounters of the same kind. Just after this moves onto a
classification of the work into a meaningful category, to subsequently interpret and evaluate
the work, concluding with the acquisition of an aesthetic judgment and an aesthetic emotion
(Noor e Hashim 2020, 7). To strengthen all of this, emotions evoked by car design are closely
linked to human values also because there is a highly visceral resemblance and relationship
between bodies of people and bodies of cars, which can force us to acknowledge the
Cars have certainly been a crucial component of the Showa period and a great symbol
of its economic growth, it is written in the very history of kei cars, and in the reason for the
creation of this legal class of vehicles. It is easy to see them as mirroring the rise of an era
(especially the post-WWII Showa) in which people were able to rebuild their lives and their
economy starting from a point in which they were so poor that they could just buy a
motorcycle, or a kei car, and the redemption, the payback of building so much from there,
step by step. As stated by Katsuyuki Hidaka, «collective nostalgia often appears after major
social changes […] because people desire a sense of continuity with the time before the
change happened» (2017, 7). This definition is certainly adequate for contemporary Japan,
and its existential and economic uncertainty: the economic stagnation dates back to the 90s,
the widening gap in income between rich and poor is alarming and serious, and Japan lost its
place to China as the world’s second economy in 2010. In such a situation a juxtaposition is
10
economic growth after the Second World War are crucially important to many Japanese
people», «citizens […] have a nostalgic longing for their country’s economic heyday» (Hidaka
2017, 6-7). All of this is emphasized by a strong desire for community, the search for a
I understand the hopes linked to those days and the sense of redemption coming with
their memory, as well as the desire, the need, to mourn, to remember. They are implicit in
human nature, and fundamental. But the reluctance to move on from aesthetics that resemble
those of the Showa era vehicles can be liked with a tendency to resume the past, and to do
it, most importantly, subconsciously. The re-perpetuation of its forms and archetypes creates
myths and fetishes, the aesthetic and ideological components of which are then transferred
into the objects now on the market, and these furtively keep on delivering veiled meanings
and attraction. This needs to be recognized, perspectivized, and dialogisized. The risk, if we
fail to do so, is to perpetuate an epic, mythical narration of events that implies a cyclical time
and eternal recurrence. In a cyclical conception of time and space, there is no space for actual
progress, and the faults and flaws of the past are romanticized and excused, silenced, and
forgotten. Nationalism becomes rampant especially when nations are forced onto the
periphery in terms of political and economic relevance (Nairn 1977), and nostalgia certainly
plays a big role in this. Any process, or, in this case, any object, favoring these phenomena
I hope this is a step in this direction, even if the objects whose nature has yet to be
understood are many. Several studies have shown how aesthetics can be used to control,
direct and stimulate specific responses in whole environments, such as big events, cities
(urban order), railway cars, and stations (Wood e Abe 2011; Kido 2005), I, therefore, believe
it is important to keep working in this direction, trying to, at least conceptually, “defuse”
11
Figure 2 Credits: World Net Rent-a-car
12
Figure 6 Credits: World Net Rent-a-car
Figure 8 Credits: World Net Rent-a-car Figure 9 Credits: Japan Web Magazine
13
Figure 13 Credits: Sabukaru
Figure 12 Credits: Autocar
14
Figure 17 Credits: Wikipedia
15
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dahlgaard, Jens J., Simon Schutte, e Ebru Ayas. 2008. «Kansei/affective engineering design
A methodology for profound affection and attractive quality creation.» The TQM
Journal - The international review of organizational improvement, 299-311.
Desmet, Peter M.A. 2003. «Measuring emotion: development and application of an
instrument to measure emotional responses to products.» In Funology: from usability to
enjoyment, di Mark A. Blythe, Kees Overbeeke, Andrew F. Monk e Peter C. Wright,
111-123. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Desmet, Pieter M.A., Steven F. Fokkinga, Deger Ozkaramanli, e JungKyoon Yoon. 2021.
«Emotion-driven product design.» In Emotion measurement, 405-426. Woodhead
Publishing.
Eguchi, Michiro, e Takeshi Okada. 2010. «Art-ethnography to Analyze the Role of Sketches
in Car Designing.» First International Conference on Design Creativity, ICDC 2010. Kobe.
Garrett, Jerry. 2007. «Small Things in Good Packages.» New York Times, 25 November.
Harada, Toshinobu, Fujiichi Yoshimoto, e Masamitsu Moriyama. 1999. «An Aesthetic Curve
in the Field of Industrial Design.» Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Visual
Languages, 38-47.
Hidaka, Katsuyuki. 2017. «What is Shōwa nostalgia?» In Japanese Media at the Beginning of the
21st Century Consuming the past, di Katsuyuki Hidaka. Oxon: Routledge.
Kido, Ewa Maria. 2005. «Aesthetic Aspects of Railway Stations in Japan and Europe, as part
of “Context Sensitive Design for Railways”.» Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for
Transportation Studies, 4381 - 4396.
Koh, Yoree. 2011. Toyota Chief: I'll Take the Taxi. 10 March.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-JRTB-9408.
Leder, Helmut, Benno Belke, Andries Oeberst, e Dorothee Augustin. 2004. «A model of
aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments.» British Journal of Psychology, 489-508.
Lee, S.Y. 1992. Human Factors Engineering for the Future. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
Nairn, Tom. 1977. The break-up of Britain: crisis and neonationalism. London: NLB and Verso
Editions.
Noor, Muhamad Aiman Afiq Mohd, e Azhari Md Hashim. 2020. «Triggering Emotional
Value Through Aesthetics of Compact Car Design in Malaysia.» International Journal
of Innovation and Industrial Revolution (IJIREV), September: 1-8.
16
Nunn, Peter. 2005. «Minicars: Cheap and Cheerful.» JAMA - Japan Automobile Manufacturers
Association, January-February.
Rees, Chris. 1995. Microcar Mania: the Definitive History of the Small Car. Oxfordshire:
Bookmarque Publishing.
Sutono, Sugoro Bhakti, Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, Hideki Aoyama, e Zahari Taha. 2016.
«Fuzzy-based Taguchi method for multi-response optimization of product form
design in Kansei engineering: a case study on car form design.» Journal of Advanced
Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, 1-16.
Toyota. 2022. History of Toyota - 75 years - Crown Comfort vehicle lineage. 2 January.
https://www.toyota-
global.com/company/history_of_toyota/75years/vehicle_lineage/car/id60005626
/index.html.
Warell, Anders. 2008. «Multi-modal visual experience of brand-specific automobile design.»
The TQM Journa - The international review of organizational improvement, 356-371.
Wood, David Murakami, e Kiyoshi Abe. 2011. «The Aesthetics of Control: Mega Events and
Transformations in Japanese Urban Order.» Urban Studies, November: 3241–3257.
17