Professional Documents
Culture Documents
等曲げモーメントを受ける連続補剛H形鋼梁の弾塑性横座屈に及ぼす横曲げ拘束効果
等曲げモーメントを受ける連続補剛H形鋼梁の弾塑性横座屈に及ぼす横曲げ拘束効果
等曲げモーメントを受ける連続補剛H形鋼梁の弾塑性横座屈に及ぼす横曲げ拘束効果
➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅ
等曲げモーメントを受ける連続補剛 H 形鋼梁の
弾塑性横座屈に及ぼす横曲げ拘束効果
ཬࡰࡍᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ຠᯝ
EFFECT OF WARPING RESTRAINT OF BEAMS TO COLUMN JOINT
ONEFFECT OF WARPING
LATERAL RESTRAINT
BUCKLING OF BEAMS
BEHAVIOR FOR TO COLUMN JOINT
H-SHAPED BEAMS
ON LATERAL BUCKLING BEHAVIOR FOR H-SHAPED BEAMS
WITH CONTINUOUS BRACES UNDER GRADIENT FLEXURAL MOMENT
WITH CONTINUOUS BRACES UNDER GRADIENT FLEXURAL MOMENT
木 村 祥 裕*1,佐 藤 唯*2
Yoshihiro KIMURA
㸨1
and Yui SATO
㸨2
ᮌᮧ ⚈⿱ 㸪బ⸨ ၏
Yoshihiro KIMURA and Yui SATO
In Japanese moment resisting steel frames, H-shaped beams are rigidly connected to the box sectional columns which have high fork restraint against lateral
buckling deformation of beams subjected to flexural moment. On the other hand, most of beams in frames are connected with continuous braces which are
effective to prevent the lateral buckling. In this paper, the equation of the elastic lateral buckling load for H-shaped beams with fork restraint and continuous
braces are developed. Elasto-plastic lateral buckling stresses and lateral stiffing force and rotational stiffing moment of continuous braces are evaluated by the
energy method and numerical analyses.
Keywords : Lateral Buckling, Fork Restraint, Continuous Braces, Required Rigidity, Stiffening Force
ᶓᗙᒅ, ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰, 㐃⥆⿵๛, ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶ, ⿵๛ຊ
1. ᗎ
Continuous braces M2 Fork deformation
1.1 ◊✲⫼ᬒ◊✲┠ⓗ
H-shaped beam Lower flange
ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅᑐࡍࡿᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳ࡢᙳ㡪ࢆ᳨ウࡋࡓ◊✲ࡣᅜෆ Column
እ࡛Ⓨ⾲ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࠼ࡤ 1)~8)ࠋ㏆ᖺ࡛ࡣᐇ࣮࣓ࣛࣥࡢ㦵⤌࠾ࡅࡿᱱ
Upper flange
ࡢᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳ࡋ࡚㸪ࡾᣊ᮰ࡸᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰╔┠ࡋ㸪ᱱࡢᶓᗙ
ᒅ⪏ຊཬࡰࡍᙳ㡪ࢆᐃᘧࡋ 2)~4)
㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧ࢆᐇ㦂ࡼࡾ᫂ࡽ Beam-to KE Ku u1
-column Joint
8)
ࡋ࡚ࡁࡓ ࠋࡾᣊ᮰ࡣᱱᮦ➃㒊ࡢࡾᢠ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡣᰕ M1 y E
z h K
tw u
ࡢࡾᢠࡸ┤ᱱࡢ᭤ࡆᢠ࡛࠶ࡿࡇࡽ㸪ᱱࡢ࿘㎶㒊ᮦࡢᙳ y x tf
㡪ࢆཷࡅࡿࡇࡀ᫂ࡽࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ 2)3)ࠋ᪉ྥ࣮࣓ࣛࣥ㦵⤌⏝ b u2
─ 145 ─
4-node Elements
ࡾ㸪ᶓᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࡀ㠀ᖖ▷ࡃ࡞ࡿࡇࡽ㸪H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ⪏ຊ
ࡸᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶࡣ㐣࡞ࡾ㸪ᐇ⏝ⓗࡣゝ࠸㞴࠸ࠋ Rotational Springs kE l’
ⴭ⪅ࡽࡣ㸪ᮦ㛗᪉ྥ㐃⥆⿵๛ࡉࢀࡓ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ Rotational Springs
l’ Between Upper Flange
H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅᑐࡍࡿ⿵๛ຠᯝࢆ᫂ࡽࡋࡓࡀ㸪ᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲ Lateral Springs ku l’ and Lower Flange K
௳ࡣ༢⣧ᨭᣢཬࡧࡾᣊ᮰ࢆᑐ㇟ࡋࡓ 6)11)ࠋࡋࡋ㸪ୖ㏙ࡢ㏻ࡾᐇ § d tf ·
Af ¨ ¸ tw
࣮࣓ࣛࣥ㦵⤌࠾ࡅࡿᱱࡣࡾ๛ᛶࡢ㧗࠸⟽ᙧ㗰ᰕ᥋ྜࡍࡿࡇ P x1 © 12 2 ¹
l P x2
ࡀከࡃ㸪ᰕᱱ᥋ྜ㒊ࡼࡿࡾᅛᐃ㸪ᰕࡢࡾᢠࡼࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ
P x3 d1
d2 d3 d
6)11) z P x3 tw
᮰ࢆཷࡅࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪ࡇࢀࡽࡢㄽᩥ ࡛ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡘ࠸࡚⪃៖ 6
x P x2
ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡋ࡚㸪⿵๛ᮦࡼࡾᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ⪏ຊࢆྥୖࡉࡏࡿࡓ y
P x1
ࡵࡣ㸪ᱱࡢ᭱᭤ࡆ⪏ຊࡲ࡛⿵๛ᮦࡣᙎᛶಖᣢࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ
Fig.2 Numerical Analysis Model
࡞࠸ࡇࡽ㸪⿵๛ᮦస⏝ࡍࡿỈᖹ⿵๛ຊ࣭⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆᢕ
Floor height h(m) 3 4 5
ᥱࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ
Box-Shaped Column
ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣ㸪ᱱࡢᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳࠾ࡼࡧ㐃⥆⿵๛ࡼࡿᶓᗙᒅ⪏ຊ Wide H-Shaped Column
ࡢᙳ㡪ࢆ᫂ࡽࡍࡿࡓࡵ㸪➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆ log K Medium Width H-Shaped Column
㔜ࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࠋࡉࡽ㸪㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦồࡵࡽࢀࡿỈᖹ⿵๛ຊ࣭⿵๛ 4
࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ㸪ᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶࡢ㛵ಀࢆ᫂ࡽࡍࡿࠋ
1.2 ᮏㄽᩥࡢᵓᡂ 2
ᮏㄽᩥࡢᵓᡂࡋ࡚㸪➨ 2 ❶࡛ࡣ㸪࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲࡼࡿ␃ཎ⌮
H-500250916
ࢆ㐺⏝ࡋ࡚㸪⌮ⓗ࡞ቃ⏺᮲௳(ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃ)࠾ࡅࡿୖࣇ 0
00 1 1.3 2 3 MPc/MPb
ࣛࣥࢪ࡛㐃⥆⿵๛ࡉࢀࡓ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺస⏝ୗ࡛ࡢ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢ Fig.3 Relationship between Column-to-beam’s
ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆㄏᑟࡍࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃ࠾ࡅࡿ Rotational Rigidity and Strength Ratio
Type A Type B
Continuous braces
ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆୗ㝈ཬࡧୖ㝈ࡋ࡚㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵
๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆᥦࡍࡿࠋࡉࡽ㸪᭷㝈せ⣲ἲ M M M M
─ 146 ─
࡚ḟᘧ࡛ồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢࡁ㸪E㸸ࣖࣥࢢ⋡㸪Ib㸸༢㛗ࡉ 1mm ᙜ K /(EI /l )
3 upper flange
1.5 u f
lower flange
ࡓࡾࡢ⿵๛ᮦࡢ᩿㠃ḟ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ㸪Ab㸸༢㛗ࡉ 1mm ᙜࡓࡾࡢ⿵ k0(Type B)
๛ᮦࡢ᩿㠃✚㸪la㸸୪ิࡍࡿᱱࡢ㛫㝸ࡍࡿࠋ k0(Type A)
2 EAb 12 EI b 1 Kmin (ku,min,kE,min )
Ku ࠉ (1a)㸪 K E (1b) K( k , k )
la la B 0 B u0 B E0
n=1
0.5 K( k ,k )
ᱱྲྀࡾࡃ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡋ࡚㸪᪤Ꮡࡢᐇᵓ㐀≀⏝ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ A 0 A u0 A E0
ࣥࢪ᩿㠃✚㸪Aw㸸࢙࢘ࣈ᩿㠃✚࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࡣ⮬⏤➃㸪ࢀኚᙧࡣᅛᐃ➃௬ᐃࡍࡿࠋᅛᐃࡢ୍ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ
ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ᑐ㇟ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ H ᙧ᩿㠃ࡣ㍈ᑐ⛠࡛࠶ࡿࡇࡽ㸪
Fig.1 ሙྜ㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧ㸪ࢀኚᙧࡶᅛᐃ➃௬ᐃࡍࡿࠋᅛᐃࡢ
♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡞ᶓᗙᒅࡢỈᖹཬࡧࢀኚᙧࡣࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᭤ࡆኚᙧ ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࠾࠸࡚㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧ㸪ࢀኚᙧࡶᱱ➃ࡽᱱ୰ኸࡲ࡛
ࢀࡒࢀୖ㸪ୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⿵๛ᮦࡣୖࣇࣛࣥࢪྲྀࡾࡃ ࡽᱱ୰ኸࡲ࡛ࢆ୍➃ᅛᐃ㸫୍➃⮬⏤࡞ࡿἼᙧࡍࡿ㸪ࡇࡢ⠊
─ 147 ─
࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲࡼࡿᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜
1 l
U
2 ³0
^ 2
EI yucc2 E*E cc2 GKb E c2 Muc2 kE E 2 kuu0 dx ` (4)
nS
us Asin x (5a) u1 u2 u1 u2
l u (7a) E (7b)
2 d
°sin 2 § 10nS · x § 13l ·
° ¨ ¸ ¨0 d x ¸ E D1 W1E (8a) E D2 W 2 E (8b)
© 13l ¹ © 20n ¹
°
§
°sin 10 nS 10 S · § 13 l l ·
x dx ¸
° ¨© 7l 7 ¹
¸ ¨
© 20n n¹
°
n 1 l · 2 Dw ½
2
° § nS · §l 6 Dw
° § nS · °
A ® 1 sin ¨
n
uf x nS ¸ ¨ dx ¸ (5b) ®GK f ¨
d
¸ ¾
© l ¹ ©n n ¹ °
¯ © l ¹ d ¿°
° W1 (9a) [ᩥ⊩ 13)(8a)ᘧ]
° 2
½ 2
4 Dw ½
2
¯° © 13l 13 ¹ © 20n ¹ § nS · 2 Dw
®GK f ¨ ¸ kE ¾
d ¯° © l ¹ d ¿°
2 nS § l · W2 (9b) [ᩥ⊩ 13)(8b)ᘧ]
°sin l x ¨0 d x d
2
¸ ° § nS ·
2
4 Dw °½ ° § nS ·
2
4 Dw ½° § Dw ·
° © 2n ¹ ®GK f ¨ ¸ k E ¾ ®GK f ¨ ¸ ¾ 4¨ ¸
°¯ © l ¹ d °¿ °¯ © l ¹ d °¿ © d ¹
°° nS § l 2n 1 ·
Ef B ®sin x ¨ xd l ¸ (6)
° l © 2n 2n ¹
° nS § 2n 1 · GKb GK w (W1 W 2 )GK f (10)
°(1)2 n1 sin 2 x¨ l x dl¸
¯° l © 2n ¹
2 n2 5n 15 ª EI f § nS ·2 °
2 2 º
ku § l ·2 °
½ n 5 ½ ku § l ·2 n5 § l · ½
2 2 2 2 2
ku § l · ° § nS · GK n 6 § l · n 6 kE § l · ° ° GK n 6 kE § l · °
n 1 P r ¨ ¸ ® ¨ ¸ ¾ « ¨ ¸ ® EI f ¨ ¸ 2 ku ¨ ¸ 2 ¨ ¸ W1 ¾ ¨ ¸ ® 2 2 ¨ ¸ W1 ku ¨ ¸ ¾» (11)
2 © nS ¹ °
¯ 2 © nS ¹ °
¿ 5 « 2 © l ¹ °
¯ 2 © l ¹ d 5 © nS ¹ 10 d © nS ¹ °
¿ 4 © nS ¹ °
¯ d 10 d © nS ¹ 500 © nS ¹ °»¼
¿
¬
2
3 §l ·
2
§ 3 § l ·2 · §S · °
2
§S ·
2
GK 3 kE § l ·
2
3 §l · ½
2
° 3 § l · GK 3 kE § l · ½
2 2
°
1 2 P r ku ¨ ¸ ¨ ku ¨ ¸ ¸ 8EI f ¨ ¸ ®2 EI f ¨ ¸ 2
¨8 ©S ¹ ¸ 2 ¨ ¸ W 1 ku ¨ ¸ ¾ ku ¨ ¸ ® 2 2 ¨ ¸ W1 ¾ (12)
8 ©S ¹ © ¹ © l ¹ °
¯ © l ¹ d 4 d © S ¹ 8 © S ¹ °
¿ 4 © S ¹ ¯ d 4 d © S ¹ °
¿
(13)
2
B § l ·
2
°B § l · ½
2
° EI f § nS ·2 ° A 2
§ nS · GK k E § l ·2 ku § l · ½
2
°
2
§ l · GK k E § l ·2 ½ °
n P2 r ku ¨ ¸ ® ku ¨ ¸ ¾ 2A ¨ ¸ ® EI f ¨ ¸ 2 B 2¨ ¸ W1 ¨ ¸ ¾ Bku ¨ ¸ ® 2 B 2¨ ¸ W1 ¾
4 © nS ¹ °
¯ 4 © nS ¹ °
¿ 2 © l ¹ °
¯ 2 © l ¹ d d © nS ¹ 2 © nS ¹ °
¿ © nS ¹ ¯ d d © nS ¹ ° ¿
A 0.30.36n 2.9 , B 0.07n 0.6
─ 148 ─
࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡁ㸪ୖグࡢ Ku/(EIf/l3)ࡣ l=13000mm(O1=200)ࡢࡁࡢ್࡛ ẚࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ(ڦ㸪)ی㸪㯮⥺ࡣ༴㝤ഃࡢホ౯࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣᚋ
࠶ࡾ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡢ⣽㛗ẚࡼࡽࡎ➼ࡋ࠸್ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡾᅛᐃ࠾ࡅࡿ ㏙ࡢ Appendix Fig.2 ♧ࡍࡼ࠺㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿᶓ᭤ࡆ
ᶓᗙᒅ᭤⥺╔┠ࡍࡿ㸪O≤ࡢሙྜ㸪Oࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿᶓᗙᒅ ᣊ᮰ᗘࡼࡿᙳ㡪ࡀపୗࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚㸪(16a)~(16c)
ᛂຊᗘࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪O≥ࡢሙྜ㸪Oࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿᶓᗙ ᘧࡢ㛵ಀ(s =0 ࡢࡁW=1㸪 W =0㸪s =1 ࡢࡁW=4㸪 W =1)ࢆ‶ࡓࡋࡘ
ᒅᛂຊᗘࡣᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ⛣⾜ࡶ୍ᐃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡉࡽ㸪 ࡘ 㸪 (17b) ᘧ ࡛ 㐃 ⥆ ⿵ ๛ క ࠺ ᶓ ᭤ ࡆ ᣊ ᮰ ᗘ ࡢ ప ୗ ࢆ ⪃ ៖ ࡋ ࡓ
Oࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࡘࢀ࡚㸪ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃ࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅᛂຊ (17a)~(17c)ᘧࢆᅗ୰⅊Ⰽ⥺࡛♧ࡍࠋࡍ࡚ࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣ⅊Ⰽ⥺ࢆୖ
ᗘࡢᕪࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣOࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ㸪ᱱࡣኚᙧࡋࡸࡍࡃ ᅇࡾ㸪Ᏻഃ࡞ࡿࡇࡽ㸪ࡇࢀ௨㝆ࡣ(17)ᘧࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿࠋ
2
࡞ࡾ㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘཬࡰࡍᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ W 1 3 K § S · EI
W (17a)㸪 W 4 (17b)㸪 s ¨ ¸ y (17c)
ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᑟฟࡋࡓᘧ࡛࠶ࡿྛ⥺ࡣᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺ 3 1 s 2h © l ¹
♧ࡍࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ ๛ᛶ K ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ(a)ࡣᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶẚࢆᅛᐃࡋ㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ
2.4 ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ୗ࠾ࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛㹆ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ ẚࢆኚࡉࡏ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ(b)ࡣỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶẚࢆᅛᐃࡋ㸪ᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶ
ࡏࡿࠋ ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࣉࣟࢵࢺẚ㍑ࡍࡿᴫࡡᑐᛂࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪(15)ᘧࡢጇᙜ
Pcr (n P2 n P1 )W n P1 (15) ᛶࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
ࡇࡇ࡛㸪 W ࢆᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘᐃ⩏ࡍࡿ㸪ḟࡢ(16a)ᘧ࡛⾲ࡏࡿࠋᘧ
୰ࡢWࡣ㸪➃㒊ࡤࡡࡼࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪(16b)ᘧ♧ 3. ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ୗ࡛ࡢ㐃⥆⿵๛㹆ᙧ㗰ᱱ
ࡍࡼ࠺㸪➃㒊ᅇ㌿๛ᛶẚ s ࡢࡁࡉࡼࡗ࡚ᅇ㌿⮬⏤ࡽᅇ㌿ᅛ ࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅ
ᐃࡢሙྜ࡛ 1~4 ࡢ㛫࡞ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪s ࡣᅽ⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ 3.1 ᙎረᛶኚᙧゎᯒᴫせ
ᛶᑐࡍࡿᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡢẚ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪(16c)ᘧ♧ࡍ࠾ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ᩘ್ゎᯒࣔࢹࣝ㸪ᑐ㇟᩿㠃ࡣ๓❶ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᮏ❶࡛ࡣᙎረᛶ
W 1 3 K §S ·
2
ኚᙧゎᯒࢆ⾜࠺ࡓࡵ㸪Table 1 ♧ࡍࡼ࠺㗰✀ࡣ SS400 ࢆᐃ
W (16a)㸪 W 4 (16b)㸪 s ¨ ¸ EI y (16c)
3 1 2s 2h ©l¹ ࡋ㸪H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᮦᩱ≉ᛶࡣࣂࣜࢽᆺࢆ㐺⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⿵๛ᮦ
nP1㸪nP2 ࡣ๓⠇࡛ᑟฟࡋࡓࡾᅛᐃ㸪ᅛᐃࡢሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅ ࡛࠶ࡿࣂࢿせ⣲ࡣᙎᛶࡋ㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ࠾ࡅࡿ⿵๛㛫㝸 l’ࡣ 2 ❶
Ⲵ㔜ᘧ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪(15)ᘧࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ ྠᵝ㸪250mm ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᱱࡢึᮇᩚࡣᩥ⊩ 6)ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪
ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ W ࡼࡗ࡚ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃࡢ㛫ࡢᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜 Fig.10 ♧ࡍ㠃እ᪉ྥ್᭱ࡀ l/2500 ࡞ࡿ sine ༙Ἴ㸪್᭱ࡀ
࡞ࡿࠋ l/10000 ࡞ࡿ sine ୍Ἴࢆ㊊ࡋྜࢃࡏࡓỈᖹኚᙧ㸪x ㍈ᅇࡾ࡛
Fig.8 㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ W ᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶẚ s ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ㯮ᐇ⥺ l/2500/(d/2)࡞ࡿ sine ༙Ἴࡢࢀኚᙧࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢึᮇᩚࡣ㸪
ࡣ(16a)~(16c)ᘧ㸪ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋW =0 ࡣࡾᅛᐃ㸪 ᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒࡼࡿ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ 2 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ┦ᙜࡋ㸪⡆౽࡞ึ
W =1 ࡣᅛᐃ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪s ࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࡘࢀ࡚ 1 ᮰ࡍࡿࠋࣉ ᮇᩚᙧ≧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡋ࡚㸪ึᮇᩚᙧ≧ࡢ㐪࠸ࡀᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧
ࣟࢵࢺࡣ㯮⥺ᑐࡋ࡚ㄗᕪ 10%௨ෆ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Type A ࡛Ỉᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ ᙳ㡪ࢆ࠼࡞࠸ࡼ࠺㸪ᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳ࡸ⿵๛๛ᛶࡼࡽࡎྠࡌࣔ
0.5 0.4
Eqs.(16a)~(16c)
0.25 Eqs.(17a)~(17c)
H-500250916, O1=200 H-500250916, O =200 H-500250916, O=200
0 2 4 s 0 2 4 6 0 2 4 log K (kN䞉mm/rad)
Fig.8 Relationship between Ratios of Fork (a) Lateral Rigidity (b) Rotational Rigidity
Restraint and Rotational Rigidity Fig.9 Relationship Between Elastic Bucking Stress For H-shaped Beams with
for Beam Ends to Flexural Rigidity Warping Restraint and Ratio of the Rotational Rigidity for Beam Ends
for Compressed Flanges
─ 149 ─
࣮ࢻタᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ᭱ึᮇᩚ㔞ࡣ㸪᪤ ࡢᩥ⊩ Table1 Material Properties
z a tan 1 (u d ) E tan 1 (u d )
2)ࡢ↓⿵๛ࡢᱱࡢᐇ㦂⤖ᯝᑐᛂࡍࡿࡼ࠺ᐃࡵ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᩥ⊩ 11) E(N/mm 2 ) 2.06ʹ105 l Sx l 2S x
u sin sin
ᐇ㦂⤖ᯝᩘ್ゎᯒࣔࢹࣝࡢẚ㍑ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᩥ⊩ 21)࡛ Vy (N/mm 2 ) 294 w 2500 l 10000 l
y
ࡶ sine ༙Ἴ୍Ἴࡢ㊊ࡋྜࢃࡏࡼࡿึᮇᩚࡀ࠼ࡽࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪 Vu (N/mm 2 ) 436 d
x
Est (N/mm 2 ) s( s d ) 2 s2 s d
ᶓᗙᒅᑐࡍࡿᙎረᛶゎᯒࡢึᮇᩚࡋ࡚ጇᙜ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡽࢀ 2.74ʹ103 w D1 D2
s d2 d2
ࡿࠋᙎረᛶኚᙧゎᯒ࠾ࡅࡿไᚚ᪉ἲࡣ㸪ᘼ㛗ቑศἲࡢ 1 ࡘ࡛࠶
Fig.10 Initial Imperfection of Elasto-plastic
ࡿ Ricks ἲࢆ᥇⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Buckling Analyses
3.2 ᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧ Warping Fixed Support W2 Fully Fixed Support
Figs.11㸪12 㸪Fig.4 ♧ࡍ Type A㸪Type B ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡘ࠸࡚ H P 㻛P Pi㻛Py
ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ᩿㠃ࡣ୍ࡋ࡚㸪⣽ᖜ H ᙧ 1 i y
0.8 b/h=0.5 b/h=0.5
᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16㸪O1=240 ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ( O =240 O =240
0.6
ࡾᅛᐃ㸪 W 2 =0.5㸪ᅛᐃ)ࢆࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪(a) 0.5K0 0.5K0
0.4
࡛ࡣᅽ⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢస⏝㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pi ࢆ㝆అ㍈Ⲵ㔜 Py (=Vy A1)࡛㝖ࡋ 0.2
ࡓ್㸪(b),(c)࡛ࡣ᭱㍈Ⲵ㔜ྛኚᙧࡀ᭱࡞ࡿ⨨࡛ࡢ㸪ᮦ 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 T/Ty
㛗ᑐࡍࡿ࢙࢘ࣈ୰ኸࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡢྜ u/l㸪ࢀኚᙧE ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚
(a) Elasto-plastic Buckling Load (a) Elasto-plastic Buckling Load
࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡁ㸪స⏝㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pi ࡣ Type A ࡢࡁୖࣇࣛࣥࢪస⏝ - Rotation Angle - Rotation Angle
ࡍࡿ P1㸪Type B ࡢࡁୗࣇࣛࣥࢪస⏝ࡍࡿ P2 ࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿࠋ(a)~(c) 4 u/l(%) u/l(%)
3
ࡢᶓ㍈ࡣ㸪y ㍈ᅇࡾࡢᮦ➃ᅇ㌿ゅ Tࢆ㝆అⲴ㔜ࡢᮦ➃ᅇ㌿ゅ Ty ࡛ 2
1
㝖ࡋࡓ್࡛࠶ࡿࠋ(d)ࡢ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪᭱㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡢᮦ㛗ᑐࡍࡿỈᖹ 0 T /Ty
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
ኚᙧࡢẚ ui/l ࡢศᕸ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Type A ࡣୖࣇࣛࣥࢪ u1 ࡘ࠸࡚㸪Type (b) Lateral Deformation (b) Lateral Deformation
B ࡣୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ u2 ࡘ࠸࡚♧ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᶓ㍈ࡣᮦ㛗᪉ྥࡢ - Rotation Angle - Rotation Angle
⨨ x/l ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ(a)ࡢࡣۃ᭱㍈Ⲵ㔜ࢆ♧ࡋ㸪ࡇࡢⅬࢆᶓᗙᒅࡀ⏕ E(rad) E(rad)
0.8
0.6
ࡌࡿⅬᐃ⩏ࡍࡿࠋ(a)ࡼࡾ㸪Type A㸪Type B ࡶࡾᅛᐃࡢሙ 0.4
0.2
ྜ㸪ᱱࡢ᭱㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡣ㸪㝆అ㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡢ 70㸣⛬ᗘ࡛࠶ࡿࡢᑐࡋ㸪 0 T/T
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 y
ᅛᐃ࡛ࡣ㸪㝆అ㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡢ 80㸣⛬ᗘࡲ࡛ୖ᪼ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ(b)㸪
(c) Torsional Deformation (c) Torsional Deformation
(c)ࡼࡾ㸪᭱Ⲵ㔜Ⅼ௨๓࡛ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿỈᖹኚ - Rotation Angle - Rotation Angle
ᙧ㸪ࢀኚᙧࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᭱Ⲵ㔜Ⅼ௨㝆࡛ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ u/l(%) u/l(%)
1
0.5
᮰ᗘࡀᑠࡉ࠸ࡶࡢ㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧࡣῶᑡࡍࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪ࢀኚᙧࡣቑ 0
-0.5
ࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࠋࡇࡢ⌮⏤ࡣ௨ୗ♧ࡍ㏻ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ᭱㍈Ⲵ㔜௨㝆㸪 -1 x/l
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
ᱱࡢረᛶࡀ㐍ᒎࡋᱱࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀపୗࡍࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪⿵๛ᮦࡣ (d) Distribution of Lateral (d) Distribution of Lateral
ᙎᛶࢆಖᣢࡋ㸪⿵๛ഃࡢୖࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡀᢚ࠼ࡽࢀࡿࡇ࡛ Deformation (u1) Deformation (u2)
ୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢࡳ࡛Ỉᖹኚᙧࡀቑຍࡋ㸪ᱱࡢࢀኚᙧࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࠋ Fig.11 Lateral Elasto-plastic Fig.12 Lateral Elasto-plastic
୍᪉㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁ࠸ሙྜ㸪ୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡀ୍య࡞ࡗ࡚ᅇ Buckling Behavior (Type A) Buckling Behavior (Type B)
㌿ࡍࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᅇ㌿ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵᱱࡢረᛶ௨㝆࡛ࡶୗࣇࣛࣥ
ࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡣቑࡏࡎ㸪ୖࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ 㛵ಀ࠶ࡿࡇࡶ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
࡛࠶ࡿࠋ Fig.14 㸪Type A㸪Type B ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ
(d)ࡼࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧ ui ⋡ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ᩿㠃㸪⣽㛗ẚ㸪ࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ㸪ซ
ࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿഴྥ࠶ࡿࠋୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡛ࡶྠᵝࡢ⌧㇟ࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁ ࡣ Fig.13 ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᙎረᛶኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶
࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿᱱ➃࡛ᶓ᭤ࡆᅇ㌿ ࡾ㸪㯮ᐇ⥺ࡣ(15)ᘧࡼࡾồࡵࡽࢀࡓ⌮ㄽ್࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡢᶓᗙᒅᛂ
ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ㸪ui/l ࡢศᕸࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ຊᗘቑຍ⋡ࡣ㸪ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢᕪ
3.3 ᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘホ౯ ศᑐࡍࡿ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰( W =0~1)ࡾᅛᐃࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂ
Fig.13 㸪Type A㸪Type B ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡘ࠸࡚ࡾᅛᐃᑐࡍࡿ ຊᗘࡢᕪศࡢྜࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢྜᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢ㛵ಀ ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ⋡ࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪
ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ᩿㠃ࡣ୍ࡋ࡚㸪⣽ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16㸪⣽㛗 ࡇࢀࡽࡣ⿵๛๛ᛶࡼࡽࡎ୍┤⥺ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ(15)ᘧࡢ㯮⥺
ẚࡣ O1=240 ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࢆࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋྛࣉࣟࢵ ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᴫࡡⰋ࠸ᑐᛂࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡽ㸪ᙎረᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛࠶
ࢺࡣᙎረᛶኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋFig.13 ࡼࡾ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡀࡁࡃ ࡗ࡚ࡶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ⋡ࡢྜࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ㸪(15)ᘧࡢ㐺⏝ࡀྍ⬟
࡞ࡿ㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢྜࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡇࡀࢃࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪 ࡛࠶ࡿࡇࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
⿵๛๛ᛶࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ㸪ᱱ➃࠾ࡅࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᑠࡉ Fig.15 㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂ
ࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢ⿵๛๛ᛶᑐࡋ࡚㸪ࡾᅛᐃ ຊᗘಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋซࡣᅗ୰♧ࡍ࠾ࡾ࡛
ᑐࡍࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡢᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢྜᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡣẚ ࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣᙎረᛶኚᙧゎᯒࡼࡾồࡵࡓ᭱㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pm ࢆ㸪᭷ຠ᩿
─ 150 ─
㠃✚ A1 ࡛㝖ࡋࡓᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘVmax 㝆అᛂຊᗘVy ࡢẚ㸪ᶓ㍈
No Bracing 0.5K0 K0 1.5K0
10)
ࡣḟᘧ࡛♧ࡍಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚ ࡛࠶ࡿࠋタィつ‽ 9)࠾ࡅࡿ᭤ࡆ Vcr, W /Vcr,w.s Vcr, W /Vcr,w.s
2
ᮦࡢ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚOb ࡣ㸪㐃⥆⿵๛ຠᯝࡸᰕࡢࡾᢠࡼࡿᶓ᭤
ࡆᣊ᮰ຠᯝࡀ⪃៖ࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡇ࡛㸪2 ❶࡛⟬ฟࡋࡓ(15)ᘧࡢᙎ 1.5
ᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ Pcr ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓḟᘧࢆಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚࡋ࡚ᥦࡍ
10 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
ࡿࡇ࡛ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ຠᯝ㐃⥆⿵๛ຠᯝࢆ⪃៖ࡍࡿࡇࡋࡓࠋ
(a) Type A (b) Type B
Vy Vy Fig.13 Ratio of Lateral Buckling Stress for Fork Restraint to that
Ob (18)
V cr Pcr A1 for Warping Fixed Support
ࡇࡇ࡛㸪ᘧ୰ࡢVy ࡣᅽ⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ㝆అᛂຊᗘ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᶓ㍈ࡣ(18) (Vcr, W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s) (Vcr, W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s)
ᘧࡢಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚ㸪ᅗ୰ࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᙎረᛶኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ㸪 1
◚⥺ࡣ(18)ᘧ䛾ಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚ䜢㐺⏝䛧䛯㗰ᵓ㐀タィつ‽ 9)ࡢᗙᒅ
0.5
Eq.(15) Eq.(15)
タィᘧࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪Vcr/Vy=0.6~1.0 ࡢᐇ⥺ࡣ⦪㍈Vcr/Vy=0.6 ࡛
ࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢ᥋⥺࡛࠶ࡿࠋᑐ㇟ࡋࡓᱱ᩿㠃㸪⣽㛗ẚ㸪⿵๛ 00 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
๛ᛶࡣ 3.2 ⠇♧ࡍ㏻ࡾ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪⿵๛ᙧᘧᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆࣃ࣓ࣛ (a) Type A (b) Type B
9)
Fig.14 Rate of Increase in Lateral Buckling Stress between
࣮ࢱࡋࡓࠋྛᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡣタィつ‽ ࡢタィᘧࢆୖᅇࡾ㸪 Warping Fixed Support and Complete Fixed Support
Vcr/Vy=0.6 ࡛ࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢ᥋⥺ࢆୖ㝈ࡋ࡚ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᅽ
Vcr/Vy
⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡀ㠀ᙎᛶᗙᒅࡍࡿ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡶ⿵๛ᮦࡣᖖᙎᛶࢆಖᣢࡍ 1.2
Reference 9)
ࡿ௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇࡽ㸪ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣタィᣦ㔪ࡢᗙ 1 tangent
ᒅ᭤⥺ᴫࡡ➼ࡋࡃ࡞ࡿࡢᑐࡋ࡚㸪㠀ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣᱱࡢረᛶ Vcr/Vy=0.6)
0.8
క࠸⿵๛ᮦࡢ๛ᛶࡀ┦ᑐⓗቑࡋ㸪ᙎᛶᇦࡼࡾࡶ⿵๛ຠᯝࡀ㧗ࡃ
࡞ࡿࡓࡵ㸪Vcr/VyӍ0.6 ࡛ࡣᩥ⊩ 9)ࡢ➼᭤ࡆࡢᗙᒅ┤⥺ࡼࡾࡶᶓᗙᒅ 0.6
ᛂຊᗘࡀୖ᪼ࡋࡓࡶࡢ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵ㸪ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣ㠀ᙎᛶ
0.4 Warping Fully
⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣ᥋⥺㏆ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᶓ᭤䛢ᣊ᮰䛥䜜䛯㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ Fixed
W1 W2 W3
Fixed
㗰ᱱ䛾ᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘ䛿䠈タィᣦ㔪 10)䛾タィᘧ䛾⣽㛗ẚ䛾௦䜟䜚 0.2 No Bracing
Type A
Type B
䛻(18)ᘧ䛾ಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚ䜢㐺⏝䛩䜛䛣䛸䛷䠈⦪㍈ Vcr/Vy<0.6 䛾ᙎᛶ 0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Ob
ᇦ䛷䛿ᴫ䛽ᤊ䛘䜙䜜䠈⦪㍈Vcr/Vy ≥0.6 䛾㠀ᙎᛶᇦ䛷䛿Ᏻഃ䛾ホ౯䛸䛺
㻌
─ 151 ─
ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡼࡽࡎ㸪ࡾᅛᐃ➼ࡋ࠸⿵๛๛ᛶ್ࢆ㐺⏝ࡍࡿࠋ l Sx
u sin D1
ࡇࡢ⌮⏤ࡣ௨ୗࡢ࠾ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ2 ❶࡛ㄏᑟࡋࡓᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ 1000 l kE
y E ku
ሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ(ᘧࡣ㸪ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃ࠾ࡅࡿ㐃 x kkuu
uu D2
l
⥆⿵๛+ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ⏝࠸࡚୧⪅ࢆ⿵㛫ࡍࡿࡇ
Fig.16 Initial (a) F (b) M
ࡼࡾᑟࢀࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵ㸪Fig.7 ♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡞㧗ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ⛣⾜Ⅼ Imperfection Fig.17 Definition of Stiffening Force
ࢆồࡵࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ࠋࡲࡓ㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ
Warping Fixed Support W2 Fully Fixed Support
ࡢୖ㝈್ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀ 1.210-3%㸪6.510-3%⛬ᗘ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᶓ᭤
ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁ࠸㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚཬࡧ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚࡣᑠࡉ F/Pm(㽢10-3%) M/(d兟Pm )(䤸10 %)
-3
ࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪Fig.8 ࡛ࡶㄝ᫂ࡋࡓ㏻ࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ 2 10
O =280 O=280
ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᅇ㌿ࡀᣊ᮰ࡉࢀ㸪ᱱ➃㏆ഐࡢỈᖹኚᙧ u ࡀ 1 b/h=0.5 5 b/h=0.5
ᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪u ࡢ✚࡛ồࡵࡽࢀࡿ⿵๛ຊࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
0 0
ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ 0.5 BK0 ࡲ࡛⿵๛ຊࡣᛴ⃭ୖ᪼ࡍࡿࡀ㸪ࡑࢀ௨ 0 0.25 0.5 0 0.75
0.25 0.51 0.75 1
㝆ࡣ⿵๛ຊ⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡢ㛵ಀࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡼࡗ࡚␗࡞ࡿഴྥ (a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment
Fig.18 Distribution of Stiffening Force
ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪㐃⥆⿵๛㛵ࡍࡿ᪤ ࡢ◊✲ 6)11)࡛ࡶ 0.5 BK0
Fmax/Pm 㽢10-3(%) Mmax/(d Pm )㽢10-3(%)
ࡽ BK0 ⛬ᗘࡲ࡛⿵๛ຊࡣୖ᪼ࡍࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪ࡑࢀ௨ୖࡢ್࡞ࡿ
2 H-500250916 O=280 8
H-500250916 O=280
పୗࡍࡿ࠸࠺ྠᵝࡢഴྥࡀࡳࡽࢀࡓࠋ๓㏙ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡼ࠺㸪Ỉᖹ
⿵๛ຊ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀ F=ku࣭u㸪M=kE ࣭(E̾D࡛⾲ࡉ
1.5 6
ࢀࡿࠋ⿵๛๛ᛶ ku㸪kEࡣ୍ᐃ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊࢆồࡵࡿࡓ
ࡵࡢỈᖹኚᙧ u ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡼࡽࡎ㸪0.5 BK0 ࡛ࣆ࣮ࢡࢆ㏄࠼㸪 1 4
¦ F Pm
i 1
0.6 N Fmax Pm (19) ẚࡶ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ⿵๛ᙧᘧࡼࡽࡎ༢⣧ᨭᣢ
n ࡢሙྜẚ㍑ࡋ࡚ᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࣉࣟࢵࢺࢆໟ⤡ࡍࡿࡼ࠺࡞ᘧࢆ⡆༢
¦ M d P
i 1
m 0.6 N M max d Pm (20)
࡞ಀᩘࢆ⏝࠸࡚㸪(21)㸪(22)ᘧࡢࡼ࠺ồࡵࡿࠋ୧ᘧࡼࡾᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰
4.3 ᭱Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ࣭⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚࡢホ౯ ᗘࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࡘࢀ࡚⿵๛ຊẚࡢẚ⋡ࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪
Fig.21 ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ㸪༢⣧ᨭᣢࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚࢆᇶ‽ࡋࡓ ࠼ࡤ Type B ࡢሙྜ㸪Fig.19 ࡽศࡿࡼ࠺㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁ
─ 152 ─
ࡃ࡞ࡿᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆኚᙧࡀᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡿࡓࡵ㸪ࢀኚᙧᅇ㌿⿵ (Fmax/Pm) (F /P ) {Mmax/(d࣭Pm)}/{Mmax,s.s/(d࣭Pm,s.s)}
max,s.s m,s.s
๛๛ᛶࡢ✚࡛࠶ࡿ⿵๛ຊࡢ್᭱ࡀῶᑡࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 1.2
Eq.(21)
Fmax Pm Fmax,s.s Pm,s.s 0.35W 0.8 (21) 1
(22) 0.8
M max d Pm M max,s.s d Pm,s.s 0.3W 0.95
0.6 0.5AK0 , 0.5BK0
0.5AK0 , 0.5BK0
Fig.22 㸪⿵๛ຊ⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣซ 0.4 AK0 , BK0 AK0 , BK0 Eq.(22)
1.5AK0 , 1.5BK0
♧ࡍᙎረᛶኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ㸪ᐇ⥺ࡣᚋ㏙ࡍࡿ⿵๛ຊẚࡢୖ㝈ホ౯ᘧ 0.2 1.5AK0 , 1.5BK0 Ref.6)
Ref.6)
ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪Fig.19 ⦪㍈ࡢ᭱᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ 000 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1W
స⏝ࡍࡿỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚཬࡧ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚࢆ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ (a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment
Fig.21 Relations between Ratio of Stiffening Force
ࡼࡿኚ⋡((21)㸪(22)ᘧࡢྑ㎶)࡛㝖ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᶓ㍈ࡣ㸪⿵๛ and Ratio of Warping Restraint
๛ᛶ㸪ࢀ㛵ࡍࡿ㡯ࢆྵࡵࡓ K࡛̓࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣᩥ⊩ 11)(19)ᘧ࡛
࠶ࡾ㸪ᮏㄽᩥ୰࡛ࡣ(23)ᘧࡋ࡚ᥖࡍࡿࠋ W Warping Fully
Type Fixed 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75
Fixed
K c ª¬ ku ku 0 kE kE 0 º¼ F (23)[ᩥ⊩ 11)(19)] A
B
ᩥ⊩ 11)࡛ࡣ㸪༢⣧ᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ
(Fmax/Pm)/(0.8-0.35W )(%) {Mmax/(d࣭Pm)}/(0.95-0.3W )(%)
ẚࡢ್᭱ࡢホ౯ᘧࡀᥦࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࢆඖ 0.01
ヨ⾜㘒ㄗⓗồࡵࡓ⿵๛ຊ⿵๛๛ᛶࡢ㛵ಀᘧ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢ༢⣧ W1 =0.1, W2 =0.25, W3 =0.5, W 4 =0.75
0.008
ᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡢホ౯ᘧ(21)㸪(22)ᘧ࡛ᐃࡵࡓᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘᑐࡍࡿኚ Eq.(25)
⋡ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓࡶࡢࡀḟᘧ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 0.006 Eq.(24)
Fmax / Pm 0.8 0.35W
0.0028 0.8 1 Kc (24)
0.004
^M max / d Pm `0.95 0.3W
0.004 0.8 1
Kc ࠉ (25)
0.002
Fig.22(a)㸪(b)୰ࡢᐇ⥺࡛♧ࡋࡓ(24)㸪(25)ᘧࡣࡰᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡢ
ୖ㝈࡞ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡢ⿵๛ຊẚ 0
00 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 K'
ࡢୖ㝈್ࢆホ౯࡛ࡁࡿࡇࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ (a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment
Fig.22 Evaluation of Upper Bound of Stiffening Force
5. ⤖
ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣ㸪➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡀస⏝ࡋ㸪ᰕࡢࡾᢠࡼࡾᶓ 4) ༢⣧ᨭᣢࡢࡁࡢ⿵๛ຊẚࡢホ౯ᘧ 11)
㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡼࡿ
᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆᑟࡁ㸪ᙎረ ⿵๛ຊࡢኚ⋡ࢆ⪃៖ࡍࡿࡇ࡛㸪ᰕࡢࡾᢠࡼࡾᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ
ᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘ⿵๛ຊࢆホ౯ࡋࡓࠋ௨ୗᚓࡽࢀࡓ⤖ㄽࢆ♧ࡍࠋ ᮰ࡉࢀࡓᱱࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚࡢୖ㝈್ࢆ(24)ᘧ㸪⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ
1) ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲࡼࡿኚศཎ⌮ࢆࡶ㸪ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃࡢ ࡢୖ㝈್ࢆ(25)ᘧ࡛ホ౯࡛ࡁࡿࡇࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
ሙྜࡘ࠸࡚➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡀస⏝ࡍࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢ
ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ(11)~(13)ᘧࢆㄏᑟࡋࡓࠋᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ H ㅰ㎡
ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡣ㸪ᰕࡢࡾᢠࡼࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡼ ᮏ◊✲ࡣ⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝⿵ຓ㔠ᇶ┙◊✲(B)(ㄢ㢟␒ྕ 19H02280)ࡼ
ࡗ࡚ࡾᅛᐃᅛᐃࡢ㛫࡞ࡿࡇࡽ㸪ࡾᅛᐃ ࡿᡂᯝ࡛࠶ࡾࡲࡍࠋࡇࡇ㸪῝ࡃឤㅰࡢពࢆ⾲ࡋࡲࡍࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᮏ◊
ᅛᐃ࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ⏝࠸࡚㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ H ✲㝿ࡋ࡚㸪
ᵝࠎ࡞ࡈຓゝࢆ㡬ࡁࡲࡋࡓᐑክ✚Ặ῝ㅰ࠸ࡓࡋࡲࡍࠋ
ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ(15)ᘧࡋ࡚ㄏᑟࡋࡓࠋࡉࡽ㸪᭷
㝈せ⣲ἲࡼࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒࡼࡾ㸪ୖ㏙ࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜 ཧ⪃ᩥ⊩
1) D. A. Nethercot, K. C. Rockey: A Unified Approach to the Elastic Lateral
ᘧࡢጇᙜᛶࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
Buckling of Beams; The Structural Engineer, Vol.49, No. 7, July, 1971
2) ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡼࡾ⟬ฟࡋࡓಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗ẚࢆタィᣦ㔪 9)
2) Suzuki, T. and Kimura Y.: Lateral Buckling of H-Shaped Beams with Warping
ࡢタィᘧ㐺⏝ࡍࡿࡇ࡛㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰 Restraint of Beam-to Column Joints, Journal of Journal of Structural and
Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), No.537, pp. 115-120, 2000. 11
ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࢆホ౯࡛ࡁࡿࡇࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ࡞࠾㸪Fig.3
(in Japanese)
♧ࡍᐇ㝿ࡢᰕᱱࡢ⤌ࡳྜࢃࡏ࠾࠸࡚㸪ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜ 3) Suzuki, T. and Kimura, Y.: Buckling Length of H-shaped Beams in Steel Rigid
ᑐࡋ࡚᭱ᑠࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ( K kN mm/rad)࡛ࡣ㸪Type A ࡛ Frame, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ),
Vol. 64, No. 521, pp. 127-132,1999. 7 (in Japanese)
0.01% 㸪 Type B ࡛ 9.66% 㸪 ᭱ ࡢ ᶓ ᭤ ࡆ ᣊ ᮰ ᗘ ( K kN
4) Takeya, M. and Idota, H.: Elastic Lateral Buckling Strength of H-Shaped Steel
mm/rad)࡛ࡣ Type A ࡛ 12.7%㸪Type B ࡛ 19.0%㸪ಟṇ୍⯡⣽㛗 Beams under Arbitrary Boundary Conditions, Journal of Structural and
ẚࡀపῶࡍࡿࡇࢆ᫂ࡽࡋࡓࠋ Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 84, No. 755, pp. 73-83,
2019. 1 (in Japanese)
3) 㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦయࡢ⿵๛ຊࡢྜィ್㸪⿵๛ຊࡢ್᭱ࡢ㛵ಀ
5) Ikarashi, K. and Onishi Y. (2014) Elastic Buckling Strength of H-shaped Beams
࡛ࡣࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜ㸪ྜィ್ࡣୖ㝈್ࡢ 60%⛬ᗘ࡞ࡿࡀ㸪ᶓ with Continuous Complete Restraint on Upper Flange, Journal of Structural and
᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࡘࢀ࡚పୗࡋ㸪ᅛᐃࡢሙྜ 35%⛬ Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 690, pp. 1513-1521,
2014. 12 (in Japanese)
ᗘ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡇࡽ㸪⿵๛ຊࡢ್᭱ࢆᢕᥱࡍࡿࡇ࡛
6) Kimura, Y., Miya, M., Liao., W.: Effect of Restraint for Continuous Braces on
యࡢྜィ್((19)㸪(20)ᘧ)ࢆᴫࡡ⟬ฟ࡛ࡁࡿࡇࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ Lateral Buckling Load for H-Shaped Beams to Column Joint, Journal of
─ 153 ─
Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 83, No. 751, Beam Considering Limit State, Journal of Structural and Construction
pp. 1353-1363, 2018. 9 (in Japanese) Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), No. 69, pp. 117-125, 1995. 3 (in Japanese)
7) Kimura, Y., Miya.: Effect of Warping Restraint of Beams to Column Joint on
Lateral Buckling Behavior for H-Shaped Beams with Continuous Braces under AppendixϨ
Gradient Flexural Moment, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering Appendix Figs.1㸪2 ࡣ㸪ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ⋡ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰
(Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 84, No. 766, pp. 1601-1611, 2019. 12 (in Japanese) ᗘࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋซࡣ Fig.13 ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᩘ್ゎᯒࣔࢹࣝࡣ Fig.2
8) Nakamura, H., Idota, H.: Cyclic Loading Tests of Steel Structure Frames ♧ࡍせ⣲ศ㸪ᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪Fig.10 ࡢึᮇᩚࢆ࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
Subjected Horizontal Loading, Journal of AIJ Tokai Chapter Architectural Appendix Figs.1㸪2 ࡣ㸪(15)ᘧࢆࡶసᡂࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖᙎረᛶ⠊ᅖ
Research Meeting, Vol. 55, pp. 157-160, 2017. 2 (in Japanese) ࡢഴྥࡀྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
୰ᮧග, ᡞ⏣⚽ᶞ: Ỉᖹຊࢆཷࡅࡿ㗰ᵓ㐀࣮࣓ࣛࣥ㦵⤌ࡢ⧞㏉ࡋ㍕Ⲵ Appendix Fig.1 ࡼࡾ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ㸪ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢྜ
ᐇ㦂, ᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫᮾᾏᨭ㒊◊✲ሗ࿌᭩, ➨ 55 ᕳ, pp. 157-160, 2017. 2 ࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡇࡀࢃࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᱱ➃࠾ࡅࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᑠࡉ
9) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ: Design Standard for Steel Structures, 2005 ࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ: 㗰ᵓ㐀タィつ‽㸪2005 Appendix Fig.2 ࡼࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ㸪ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ
10) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ: Recommendation for Limit State Design of ⋡ࡣࡁࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪ࡇࢀࡽࡣ⿵๛๛ᛶࡼࡽࡎ୍┤⥺ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
Steel Structures, 2010 (in Japanese) Appendix Figs.1㸪2 Figs.13㸪14 ࢆẚ㍑ࡋࡓ⤖ᯝ㸪ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ㸪ᙎረᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ: 㗰ᵓ㐀㝈⏺≧ែタィᣦ㔪࣭ྠゎㄝ, 2010 ྠᵝࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
11) Kimura, Y., Yoshino, Y. and Ogawa J.: Effect of Lateral-Rotational Restraint and Vcr,W /Vcr,w.s Vcr,W /Vcr,w.s
2
Strength of Continuously Braces on Lateral Buckling Load for H-Shaped Beams,
Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 1.5
77, No. 683, pp. 193-201, 2011. 12 (in Japanese)
10 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
12) Kimura, Y .and Yoshino, Y.: Effect of Lateral-Rotational Restraint of Continuous
Braces on Lateral Buckling Strength for H-Shaped Beams with Flexural Moment (a)Type A (b)Type B
Appendix Fig.1
Gradient, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of
AIJ), Vol. 81, No. 726, pp. 1309-1319, 2016. 8 (in Japanese) (Vcr,W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s) (Vcr,W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s)
13) Kimura, Y., Sugita, Y. and Yoshino, Y. (2016) Effect of Lateral-Rotational 1
Restraint of Continuous Braces on Lateral Buckling Strength for H-Shaped Steel
0.5
Beams with Compressive Axial Force and Flexural Moment, Journal of Structural
and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 81, No. 726, pp. 1321- 00 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
1331, 2016. 8 (in Japanese) (a)Type A (b)Type B
14) Kimura, Y .and Sugita, Y.: Effect of Lateral-Rotational Restraint by Continuous Appendix Fig.2
Braces on Lateral Buckling Strength for H-Shaped Beams with Gradient Flexural
Moment and Compressive Axial Force, Journal of Structural and Construction Appendixϩ
Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol.82, No.741, pp.1799-1809,2017.11 (in ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࢆ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦᐃࡋ࡚㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ࡛⿵๛㛫㝸ࢆ
Japanese) l’=250mm ࡋ࡚ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢጇᙜᛶࢆ᳨ドࡋࡓࡀ㸪ࡼࡾ⿵๛㛫㝸ࡢᗈ
15) Tsuda, K .and Kido, M.: Buckling Strength of Columns Braced Continuously with ࠸ᢡᯈࡸ㞳ᩓⓗྲྀࡾࡘࡃẕᒇᮦࡢࡼ࠺࡞ሙྜࡘ࠸࡚ࡶᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ
Varying Axial Force:-Flexural buckling of compressive flange of H-shaped steel ࡀ㐺⏝࡛ࡁࡿࡇࢆ᳨ドࡍࡿࠋAppendix Fig.3 ྛ⿵๛㛫㝸࡛ࡢᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎ
restrained by web or slab-, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering ᯒ⤖ᯝࡢపୗ⋡ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ l’=100mm ࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝᑐࡍ
(Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 690, pp. 1513-1521, 2013. 8 (in Japanese) ࡿ㸪௵ពࡢ⿵๛㛫㝸࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡢྜࡋ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣᮦ㛗 l
16) Matsui, R., Yamaura, Y. and Takeuchi T.: Lateral Bracing Requirements for H- ᑐࡍࡿ⿵๛㛫㝸 l’ࡢྜ l’/l ࡍࡿࠋࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ W =0㸪0.5㸪1
Section Beams with Supports Attached to Top Flange Subjected to Cyclic ࡛㸪Type A㸪Type B ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⣽ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16(b/h=0.5)㸪
Antisymmetric Moment, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering ᶓᗙᒅ⣽㛗ẚO1=200(l=13000mm)㸪ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ AK0 ࡶࡋࡃࡣ BK0 ࡛࠶
(Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 690, pp. 1485-1492, 2013. 8 (in Japanese) ࡿࠋ⿵๛㛫㝸ࡢྜࡀ l’/l=0.05(l’=650mm)⛬ᗘࡲ࡛ࡣ㸪పୗ⋡ࡣ 0.26%~4.1%⛬
17) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ (2013) Stability Problems of Steel Structures ᗘ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡀ㸪 l’/lӍ0.077 ࡛ 10%⛬ᗘపୗࡍࡿࠋᐇ㝿ࡢᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡢ⿵
2013. 2013. 6 (in Japanese) ๛㛫㝸ࡣ 200~500mm ࡛࠶ࡾ 20)㸪⿵๛㛫㝸ࡼࡽࡎᮏㄽᩥࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ: 㗰ᵓ㐀≀ࡢᗙᒅ㛵ࡍࡿㅖၥ㢟 2013, 2013.6 ࢆ㐺⏝࡛ࡁࡿࡇࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
18) Yuki, Y. and Kimura Y.: The Tests on Lateral Buckling of H-shaped Steel Beams
with Folded-Roof Plates under Cyclic Load, Proceedings of Constructional Steel. ᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ (l 㻓=100mm)
Vol.24, pp.118-121, 2016.11 (in Japanese) 1.2
ྜྷ㔝⿱㈗, ᮌᮧ⚈⿱: ⧞㏉ࡋ㍕Ⲵࢆཷࡅᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡘࡁ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ 1
㍕Ⲵᐇ㦂, 㗰ᵓ㐀ᖺḟㄽᩥሗ࿌㞟, ➨ 24 ᕳ, pp. 810-813, 2016. 11
0.8
19) ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual version6.14䠈2014. 4 H-500250916 (b/h=0.5)
20) Japan Steel Corporation: Material handbook for buildings, 2019 (in Japanese) 0.6 O1=200 (l=13000mm) K0
᪥ᮏ〇㕲ᰴᘧ♫: ᘓ⠏⏝㈨ᮦࣁࣥࢻࣈࢵࢡ, 2019 0.4 W =0 W =0.5 W =1
21) Idota, H., Kato, Y. and Ono, T.: Lateral Bracing Spacing and Strength of H- 0.2
Type A
Shaped Steel Beams under Cyclic Loading, Journal of Structural and Construction Type B
0 l'/l
Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 693, pp. 1989-1998, 2013. 11 (in 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
l 㻓(mm)
Japanese) 100 500 1000
22) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ: Japanese Architectural Standard Appendix Fig.3 ⿵๛㛫㝸ࡢ᳨ウ
Specification 6, 2018
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ: ᘓ⠏ᕤᶆ‽ᵝ᭩ JASS6 㕲㦵ᕤ, 2018
23) Suzuki, T.: Lateral Bracing Forces on Beams and Columns, Journal of Structural
and Construction Engineering, Transactions of the Architectural Institute of Japan,
No. 41, p. 295, 1966. 10 (in Japanese)
㕥ᮌᩄ㑻: ᗙᒅᨭⅬࡢᶓ⿵๛ຊࡘ࠸࡚, ᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫㄽᩥሗ࿌㞟, ྕእ,
p. 295, 1966. 10
24) Ono, T., Ishida, T. and Shimono, K.: A Study on Bracing for Steel Column and
─ 154 ─
EFFECT OF WARPING RESTRAINT OF BEAMS TO COLUMN JOINT
EFFECT ON LATERAL FOR
OF RESTRAINT BUCKLING BEHAVIOR
CONTINUOUS FOR
BRACES ONH-SHAPED BEAMS LOAD
LATERAL BUCKLING
WITH
FOR CONTINUOUS
H-SHAPED BRACES
BEAMS WITH UNDER
WARPING GRADIENT
RESTRAINT FLEXURAL
OF BEAMS MOMENT
TO COLUMN JOINT
*1
Prof.,
*1 Professor Graduate
㸪Graduate School,
School Tohoku 㸪
of Engineering University, Dr.Eng.㸪Dr.Eng.
Tohoku University
*2
Grad. Student, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University
*2 Graduate Student㸪Graduate School of Engineering㸪Tohoku University㸪B.Eng.
In design standard for steel structures (AIJ 2005), the boundary condition of beams under lateral buckling load is provided as simple
support. Meanwhile, beams are often jointed to box-shaped columns with high torsional rigidity as shown in Figure 1. Therefore, beam
ends have fork restraint by high torsional rigidity of column on lateral buckling, which is considered the rotational effect between warping
and fully fixed supports.
On the other hand, long span main beams may not possess the full plastic strength due to lateral buckling, so that many lateral braces
should be set up along the beams to prevent the lateral buckling deformation (AIJ 2010). When non-structural members such as folded roof
plate are directly jointed to beams, they may be used as the continuous braces. However, in Japanese design code, the non-structural
members are not considered as braces. Kimura, Yoshino, and Ogawa (2013) clarified the lateral buckling behavior for H-shaped beam with
continuous braces when the boundary condition of the beams is simple support.
This paper evaluates the effect of fork restraint on elastic lateral buckling load for H-shaped beams with continuous braces under the
uniform flexural moment and Saint-Venant torsional rigidities in energy conservation equations. In this study, two types of loading
conditions are considered, where the upper flange’s compressive load is larger than the lower flange’s one (loading condition, Type A), and
where the upper flange’s compressive load is smaller than the lower flange’s one (loading condition, Type B). The continuous braces rigidity
is divided into the lateral rigidity, ku, and rotational rigidity, kE, as shown in Fig.1. In the case of Type A, lateral rigidity is effective for
preventing lateral deformation of compressive upper flange, whereas in the case of Type B, rotational rigidity is effective for preventing
torsional deformation. Considering fork restraint by column, elastic lateral buckling load of beams with continuous braces are expressed as
the loads between warping and fully fixed support.
This study is conducted by the following procedures:
࣭ The elastic lateral buckling load with warping and fully fixed support under flexural moment is developed by energy method, and
can be calculated with Eqs. (11)~(13). Considering fork restraint by column, elastic lateral buckling load of beams with continuous
braces are expressed as the loads between warping and fully fixed support. The results are verified by eigenvalue analyses.
࣭ The elasto-plastic lateral buckling behaviors of the beams are simulated by elasto-plastic large deformation analysis. The lower bound
of the elasto-plastic lateral buckling stress of the beams are evaluated according to the buckling curve of bending member provided
by Recommendation for Limit State Design of Steel Structure (AIJ), using proposing modified equivalent slenderness ratio.
࣭ The relationship between the total value of the stiffing force of the whole continuous braces and the maximum value was grasped. In
the case of warping fixed support, the total value is about 60% of the upper bound value. Next, it decreases as the fork rigidity
increases, and is about 35% in the case of fully fixed support.
࣭ The upper bound of rotational stiffening moment and lateral stiffening force of continuous braces is evaluated by Eqs. (24) and (25)
based on the ratio of flexural and torsional rigidities of beams when the lateral buckling of beams with fork restraint by column occur.
.
(2020 年 5 月 10 日原稿受理,2020 年 10 月 1 日採用決定)
─ 155 ─