日本建築学会構造系論文集 第86巻 第779号， 145-155，2021年1月

【カテゴリーⅡ】 J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, Vol. 86 No. 779, 145-155, Jan., 2021

DOI https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.86.145

➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅ
等曲げモーメントを受ける連続補剛 H 形鋼梁の
弾塑性横座屈に及ぼす横曲げ拘束効果
࡟ཬࡰࡍᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ຠᯝ
EFFECT OF WARPING RESTRAINT OF BEAMS TO COLUMN JOINT
ONEFFECT OF WARPING
LATERAL RESTRAINT
BUCKLING OF BEAMS
BEHAVIOR FOR TO COLUMN JOINT
H-SHAPED BEAMS
ON LATERAL BUCKLING BEHAVIOR FOR H-SHAPED BEAMS
WITH CONTINUOUS BRACES UNDER GRADIENT FLEXURAL MOMENT
WITH CONTINUOUS BRACES UNDER GRADIENT FLEXURAL MOMENT
木 村 祥 裕＊1，佐 藤   唯＊2
Yoshihiro KIMURA
㸨1
and Yui SATO
㸨2
ᮌᮧ ⚈⿱ 㸪బ⸨ ၏
Yoshihiro KIMURA and Yui SATO
        
In Japanese moment resisting steel frames, H-shaped beams are rigidly connected to the box sectional columns which have high fork restraint against lateral
buckling deformation of beams subjected to flexural moment. On the other hand, most of beams in frames are connected with continuous braces which are
effective to prevent the lateral buckling. In this paper, the equation of the elastic lateral buckling load for H-shaped beams with fork restraint and continuous
braces are developed. Elasto-plastic lateral buckling stresses and lateral stiffing force and rotational stiffing moment of continuous braces are evaluated by the
energy method and numerical analyses.
       
Keywords : Lateral Buckling, Fork Restraint, Continuous Braces, Required Rigidity, Stiffening Force
ᶓᗙᒅ, ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰, 㐃⥆⿵๛, ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶ, ⿵๛ຊ
        
1. ᗎ
Continuous braces M2 Fork deformation
1.1 ◊✲⫼ᬒ࡜◊✲┠ⓗ
H-shaped beam Lower flange
ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ࡟ᑐࡍࡿᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳ࡢᙳ㡪ࢆ᳨ウࡋࡓ◊✲ࡣᅜෆ Column
እ࡛Ⓨ⾲ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ౛࠼ࡤ 1)~8)ࠋ㏆ᖺ࡛ࡣᐇ࣮࣓ࣛࣥࡢ㦵⤌࡟࠾ࡅࡿᱱ
Upper flange
ࡢᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳࡜ࡋ࡚㸪཯ࡾᣊ᮰ࡸᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰࡟╔┠ࡋ㸪ᱱࡢᶓᗙ
ᒅ⪏ຊ࡟ཬࡰࡍᙳ㡪ࢆᐃᘧ໬ࡋ 2)~4)
㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧ࢆᐇ㦂࡟ࡼࡾ᫂ࡽ Beam-to KE Ku u1
-column Joint
8)
࠿࡟ࡋ࡚ࡁࡓ ࠋ཯ࡾᣊ᮰ࡣᱱᮦ➃㒊ࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡣᰕ M1 y E
z h K
tw u
ࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠࡸ┤஺ᱱࡢ᭤ࡆ᢬ᢠ࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᱱࡢ࿘㎶㒊ᮦࡢᙳ y x tf
㡪ࢆཷࡅࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ 2)3)ࠋ஧᪉ྥ࣮࣓ࣛࣥ㦵⤌࡟⏝ b u2

࠸ࡽࢀࡿ⟽ᙧ㗰⟶ࡸ෇ᙧ㗰⟶➼ࡢ㛢᩿㠃㒊ᮦࡣ㸪㧗࠸཯ࡾᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ a) H-shaped Beam with (b) Buckling Deformation

Flexural Moment of Section
᭷ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᱱ➃ࡣ཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡟㏆࠸ࠋᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡣᰕࡢ㝵㧗ࡸ
Fig.1 H-shaped Beam with Continuous Braces
┤஺ᱱࡢᙅ㍈᪉ྥࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡢ኱ࡁࡉ࡟ࡼࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᚲࡎࡋࡶᶓ and Beam-to-column Joints
᭤ࡆᅛᐃ࡜ࡣ࡞ࡽࡎ㸪ࡲࡓ᭱ୖ㝵࡛ࡣᱱࡢୗ➃࡟ࡢࡳᰕࡀྲྀࡾ௜ࡃ
ࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ(Fig.1)㸪୰㛫ᒙ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᱱ࡟ẚ࡭ࡿ࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡣపୗ 18)
ࡓᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅᐇ㦂 ࡛ࡣ㸪ᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡀᱱࡢ㠃ෆ᭤ࡆ࡟ࡣᐤ୚ࡏࡎ㸪
9)
ࡍࡿࠋࡋ࠿ࡋ㸪⌧⾜ࡢ㗰ᵓ㐀タィつ‽ 㸪㗰ᵓ㐀㝈⏺≧ែタィᣦ㔪࣭ ⿵๛఩⨨࡛ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅኚᙧࡣ᏶඲ᅛᐃࡉࢀ࡞࠿ࡗࡓࡶࡢࡢ㸪↓⿵๛
ྠゎㄝ 10)࡛ࡣ㸪ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ᱱࡢᮦ➃ᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ㐺ษ࡟つᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ࡜ ࡢᱱ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢྥୖࡀ☜ㄆࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡘࡲࡾ㸪༑ศ࡞
ࡣゝ࠸㞴࠸ࠋ ⿵๛๛ᛶࢆᣢࡓ࡞࠸ᒇ᰿ᢡᯈ➼ࡢࡼ࠺࡞㠀ᵓ㐀㒊ᮦ࡛ࡶ㸪ᗙᒅኚᙧ
୍᪉࡛㸪ᐇᵓ㐀≀࡟࠾ࡅࡿᱱ࡟ࡣ㸪ᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡸᗋࢫࣛࣈ➼ࡢ㠀ᵓ ᣊ᮰ຠᯝࢆⓎ᥹ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ♧၀ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡋ࠿ࡋ㸪タィᣦ㔪 10)࡛
6)㸪7)㸪11)~16)
㐀㒊ᮦࡀᮦ㛗᪉ྥ࡟㐃⥆ⓗ࡟ྲྀࡾࡘ࠸࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᪤ ࡢ◊✲ ࡣ㸪ᱱࡀᮦ㛗᪉ྥࡢ⿵๛Ⅼ࡛᏶඲ᅛᐃࡉࢀࡓ≧ែ(⿵๛Ⅼ࡛Ỉᖹኚᙧ
࡛ࡣ㸪ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅኚᙧ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ᱱ࡟ྲྀࡾࡘࡃ㠀ᵓ㐀㒊ᮦࡀ㐃⥆⿵๛ ࡜ᅇ㌿ኚᙧࡀ⏕ࡌ࡞࠸≧ែ)࡛࠶ࡿከⅬ⿵๛ࡉࢀࡓሙྜࡢᚲせ⿵๛
ࡑࢀࡽࡢᡂᯝࡀᩥ⊩ 17)
ຠᯝࢆⓎ᥹ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪 ๛ᛶࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᮦ㛗᪉ྥ࡟㞳ᩓⓗ࡞⿵๛ࢆᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶
࡛㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦ࡜ࡋ࡚⤂௓ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡋ࡚㸪ᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡀྲྀࡾ௜࠸ ࡿࠋ㐃⥆⿵๛࡟ࡇࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆ㐺⏝ࡍࡿ࡜㸪᥋ྜ⟠ᡤࡀ⿵๛༊㛫࡟࡞
㸨1 ᮾ໭኱Ꮫ኱Ꮫ㝔ᕤᏛ◊✲⛉ ᩍᤵ ༤ኈ(ᕤᏛ) Prof., Graduate School, Tohoku University, Dr. Eng.
＊1
　東北大学大学院工学研究科 教授・博士 （工学） Prof., Graduate School, Tohoku University, Dr.Eng.
㸨2
＊ 2 ᮾ໭኱Ꮫ኱Ꮫ㝔 ༤ኈㄢ⛬๓ᮇ Grad. Student, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University
　東北大学大学院 博士前期課程 Grad. Student, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University

─ 145 ─
 4-node Elements
ࡾ㸪ᶓᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࡀ㠀ᖖ࡟▷ࡃ࡞ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ⪏ຊ
ࡸᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶࡣ㐣኱࡟࡞ࡾ㸪ᐇ⏝ⓗ࡜ࡣゝ࠸㞴࠸ࠋ Rotational Springs kE l’
ⴭ⪅ࡽࡣ㸪ᮦ㛗᪉ྥ࡟㐃⥆⿵๛ࡉࢀࡓ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ Rotational Springs
l’ Between Upper Flange
H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ⿵๛ຠᯝࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡋࡓࡀ㸪ᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲ Lateral Springs ku l’ and Lower Flange K
௳ࡣ༢⣧ᨭᣢཬࡧ཯ࡾᣊ᮰ࢆᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓ 6)11)ࠋࡋ࠿ࡋ㸪ୖ㏙ࡢ㏻ࡾᐇ § d tf ·
Af  ¨  ¸ tw
࣮࣓ࣛࣥ㦵⤌࡟࠾ࡅࡿᱱࡣ᤟ࡾ๛ᛶࡢ㧗࠸⟽ᙧ㗰ᰕ࡜᥋ྜࡍࡿࡇ࡜ P x1 © 12 2 ¹
l P x2
ࡀከࡃ㸪ᰕᱱ᥋ྜ㒊࡟ࡼࡿ཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪ᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ
P x3 d1
d2 d3 d
6)11) z P x3 tw
᮰ࢆཷࡅࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪ࡇࢀࡽࡢㄽᩥ ࡛ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰࡟ࡘ࠸࡚⪃៖ 6
x P x2
ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡋ࡚㸪⿵๛ᮦ࡟ࡼࡾᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ⪏ຊࢆྥୖࡉࡏࡿࡓ y
P x1
ࡵ࡟ࡣ㸪ᱱࡢ᭱኱᭤ࡆ⪏ຊ᫬ࡲ࡛⿵๛ᮦࡣᙎᛶಖᣢࡋ࡞ࡅࢀࡤ࡞ࡽ
Fig.2 Numerical Analysis Model
࡞࠸ࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪⿵๛ᮦ࡟స⏝ࡍࡿỈᖹ⿵๛ຊ࣭⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆᢕ
Floor height h(m) 3 4 5
ᥱࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋ
Box-Shaped Column
ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣ㸪ᱱࡢᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳࠾ࡼࡧ㐃⥆⿵๛࡟ࡼࡿᶓᗙᒅ⪏ຊ Wide H-Shaped Column
࡬ࡢᙳ㡪ࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡟㸪➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆ log K Medium Width H-Shaped Column

ᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅᣲືࢆᢕᥱࡋ㸪ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅⲴ 5.4

㔜ࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࠋࡉࡽ࡟㸪㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦ࡟ồࡵࡽࢀࡿỈᖹ⿵๛ຊ࣭⿵๛ 4
࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ࡜Ỉᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ㸪ᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶࡢ㛵ಀࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡍࡿࠋ
1.2 ᮏㄽᩥࡢᵓᡂ 2
ᮏㄽᩥࡢᵓᡂ࡜ࡋ࡚㸪➨ 2 ❶࡛ࡣ㸪࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲ࡟ࡼࡿ೵␃ཎ⌮
H-500™250™9™16
ࢆ㐺⏝ࡋ࡚㸪⌮᝿ⓗ࡞ቃ⏺᮲௳(཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃ)࡟࠾ࡅࡿୖࣇ 0
00 1 1.3 2 3 MPc/MPb
ࣛࣥࢪ࡛㐃⥆⿵๛ࡉࢀࡓ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺస⏝ୗ࡛ࡢ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢ Fig.3 Relationship between Column-to-beam’s
ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆㄏᑟࡍࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ Rotational Rigidity and Strength Ratio
Type A Type B
Continuous braces
ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆୗ㝈ཬࡧୖ㝈࡜ࡋ࡚㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵
๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆᥦ᱌ࡍࡿࠋࡉࡽ࡟㸪᭷㝈せ⣲ἲ࡟ M M M M

ࡼࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ࡟ࡼࡾ㸪ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢጇᙜᛶࢆ♧ࡍࠋ➨ (a) Type A (b) Type B

3 ❶࡛ࡣ㸪ᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ࡟ࡼࡾ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙ
ᒅᣲືࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡍࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪➨ 2 ❶࡛ồࡵࡓᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ
୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚ࡟㐺⏝ࡋࡓ⌧⾜ࡢタィᣦ㔪 10)࡟࠾ࡅࡿᗙᒅ᭤⥺ࢆ⏝࠸
࡚㸪ᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒࡼࡾᚓࡽࢀࡓᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࠋ
➨ 4 ❶࡛ࡣ㸪ᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ࡟ࡼࡾ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ H
ᙧ㗰ᱱ࡟ྲྀࡾ௜ࡃ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡢస⏝Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊཬࡧస⏝⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔ
ࣥࢺࢆ⿵๛๛ᛶ࡜ࡢ㛵ಀ࠿ࡽ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡋ㸪⿵๛ᮦࡢ⪏ຊࢆᢕᥱࡍࡿࠋ
➨ 5 ❶࡛ࡣ㸪
➨ 2 ❶~➨ 4 ❶ࡲ࡛࡟ᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢࢆ⤖ㄽ࡜ࡋ࡚♧ࡍࠋ
2. ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜
2.1 ᩘ್ゎᯒᴫせ
ᮏ⠇࡛ࡣ㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ඲⯡ࡢᑐ㇟⠊ᅖ㸪ゎᯒ᮲௳ཬࡧ᭷㝈せ⣲ゎᯒ
ࣔࢹࣝࢆ♧ࡍࠋᩘ್ゎᯒ࡟ࡣ㸪᭷㝈せ⣲ἲỗ⏝ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛ
ABAQUS6.1419)ࢆ⏝࠸ࡿࠋゎᯒࣔࢹࣝࡣ Fig.2 ࡟♧ࡍ㏻ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋH
ᙧ㗰ᱱࢆ 4 ⠇Ⅼࢩ࢙ࣝせ⣲㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ᮦࢆỈᖹࣂࢿせ⣲㸪ᅇ㌿⿵๛
ᮦࢆᅇ㌿ࣂࢿせ⣲㸪ᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡿ➃㒊ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࢆᱱ➃࢘
࢙ࣈ୰ኸ࡟ྲྀࡾ௜ࡃᅇ㌿ࣂࢿせ⣲࡟⨨᥮ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᱱ➃ࡢ᩿
㠃ࢆ๛య࡟ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛ୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ㛫ࡢᅇ㌿ࢆᅛᐃࡋ㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃࢆ
⾲ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᱱ➃ࡢⲴ㔜᮲௳ࡣ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ࡜ࡋ㸪୕ゅᙧศᕸ
ࡢ㍈ᛂຊ࡜࡞ࡿⲴ㔜ࢆᱱ୧➃ࡢୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ୰ኸཬࡧྛ࢙࢘ࣈ⠇Ⅼ
࡟୚࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࡞࠾㸪ྛⲴ㔜⠇Ⅼࡢ఩⨨ࡣ Fig.2 ྑୗ࡟♧ࡍ㏻ࡾ࡛
࠶ࡾ㸪ྛ⠇Ⅼࡢ୰❧㍈࠿ࡽࡢ㊥㞳࡛࠶ࡿ d1~d3 ࡢ఩⨨࡟അຊࢆ୚࠼㸪
᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆస⏝ࡉࡏࡿࠋࣂࢿせ⣲ࢆ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᮦ㛗᪉ྥ࡟୍
ᐃ㛫㝸 l’࡛タࡅ㸪ࣂࢿせ⣲ 1 ࡘᙜࡓࡾࡢ⿵๛๛ᛶࢆ ku l’(kN/mm)㸪
Fig.4 Loading Conditions
఩㛗ࡉᙜࡓࡾࡢỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶཬࡧᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ࡇࢀࡽࢆ⥲
⛠ࡋ࡚⿵๛๛ᛶ㸪l’ࢆ⿵๛㛫㝸࡜࿧ࡪࠋku㸸⿵๛ᮦ࡟ࡼࡿ༢఩㛗ࡉᙜ
ࡓࡾࡢỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ(kN/mm2)㸪kE㸸⿵๛ᮦ࡟ࡼࡿ༢఩㛗ࡉᙜࡓࡾࡢᅇ
㌿⿵๛๛ᛶ(kN/rad)࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
ࡇࡇ࡛㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦ࡜ࡋ࡚ࡣ㸪ᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡸᮦ㛗᪉ྥ࡟」ᩘྲྀࡾࡘࡃ
ẕᒇᮦ➼ࡀ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࡀ㸪ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣ㸪ᐇ㝿ࡢᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡀᱱ࡟⁐᥋
᥋ྜࡉࢀࡓࢱ࢖ࢺࣉ࣮ࣞࢺ࡜ᒣࡢ㒊ศ࡛࣎ࣝࢺ᥋ྜࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ࡜᝿
ᐃࡋ㸪ᢡᯈࡢ㞄ࡾྜ࠺ᒣ࡜ᒣࡢ㛫㝸(⿵๛㛫㝸)ࢆ l’=250mm ࡜ࡍࡿࠋ
ࡓࡔࡋ㸪ᩥ⊩ 13)࡜ྠᵝ࡟㸪༢఩㛗ࡉᙜࡓࡾࡢ⿵๛๛ᛶࢆ➼ࡋࡃࡋ㸪
⿵๛㛫㝸ࢆ l’=250~500mm ࡟ኚ໬ࡉࡏࡓሙྜ࡛࠶ࡗ࡚ࡶ㸪l’=100mm
࡟࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡜ࡢㄗᕪࡣ 0.26%~2.75%࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡑ
ࡢࡓࡵ㸪⿵๛㛫㝸 l’=100~500mm ࡢ⠊ᅖ࡛࠶ࢀࡤ㸪㐃⥆⿵๛࡜ࡳ࡞
ࡏࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ☜ㄆࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓ㸪ヲ⣽ࢆ Appendixϩ࡟♧ࡍࠋ
ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣ㸪ᩥ⊩ 11)࡜ྠᵝ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࢆ⾲ࡍᣦᶆ࡜ࡋ࡚ H ᙧ㗰ᱱ
ࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ⿵๛ᮦࡢỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶࡢẚ࡛࠶ࡿỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ
ẚ Ku/(EIf/l3)㸪H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢ᤟ࡾ๛ᛶ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ⿵๛ᮦࡢᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶࡢẚ
࡛࠶ࡿᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶẚ KE/(GKf/d)ࢆ⏝࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࡜ࡍࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪If㸸ᱱ
ࡢᙅ㍈ᅇࡾ࡟࠾ࡅࡿୖࡶࡋࡃࡣୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᩿㠃஧ḟ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ㸪
G㸸ᱱࡢᙎᛶࡏࢇ᩿ಀᩘ(=E/2(1+Q))㸪Kf㸸ࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᤟ࡾᐃᩘ㸪l㸸ᱱ
㛗㸪d㸸ୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ୰ᚰ㛫㊥㞳࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪Ku(kN/mm)㸪KE(kN
mm/rad)ࡣ⿵๛๛ᛶ ku㸪kE࡟༢఩㛗ࡉ 1mm ࢆ஌ࡌࡓ್࡜ࡍࡿࠋ
H ᙧ㗰ᱱ࡜㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡢ᥋ྜࢆ๛᥋ྜ࡜௬ᐃࡍࡿ࡜㸪ᒇ᰿ᢡᯈ➼
kEl’(kNmm/rad)࡜ࡍࡿࠋku ཬࡧ kEࡣ㸪ᱱ㛗⿵๛㛫㝸᪉ྥ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ༢ ࡢ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡢỈᖹཬࡧᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶࡣ㸪ᢡᯈࡢ୍ᒣศࡢ๛ᛶ࡜ࡋ

─ 146 ─
࡚ḟᘧ࡛ồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋࡇࡢ࡜ࡁ㸪E㸸ࣖࣥࢢ⋡㸪Ib㸸༢఩㛗ࡉ 1mm ᙜ K /(EI /l )
3 upper flange
1.5 u f
lower flange
ࡓࡾࡢ⿵๛ᮦࡢ᩿㠃஧ḟ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ㸪Ab㸸༢఩㛗ࡉ 1mm ᙜࡓࡾࡢ⿵ k0(Type B)
๛ᮦࡢ᩿㠃✚㸪la㸸୪ิࡍࡿᱱࡢ㛫㝸࡜ࡍࡿࠋ k0(Type A)
2 EAb 12 EI b 1 Kmin (ku,min,kE,min )
Ku ࠉ (1a)㸪 K E (1b) K( k , k )
la la B 0 B u0 B E0
n=1
0.5 K( k ,k )
ᱱ࡟ྲྀࡾ௜ࡃ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦ࡜ࡋ࡚㸪᪤Ꮡࡢᐇᵓ㐀≀࡟౑⏝ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ A 0 A u0 A E0

ࡿᒇ᰿ᢡᯈ 20)ࡀ⣽ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃(H-500×250×9×16)࡟ྲྀࡾ௜࠸ࡓሙྜ㸪

Ỉᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ Ku/(EIf/l3)Ӌ1.0㸪
ᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶẚ KE/(GKf/d)=0.01~0.1 ࡜ 0 n=2
0 0.01 0.02 KE/(GKf/d) Buckling Deformation
࡞ࡿࠋࡓࡔࡋ㸪ᵓ㐀≀࡟࠾࠸࡚୪ิࡋࡓᱱࡀྠࡌ᪉ྥ࡟ྠ᫬࡟ᶓᗙᒅ
Fig.5 Relations between Lateral and Rotational Rigidities
ࡍࡿ࡜ࡁ㸪ᱱ࡟┤஺ࡋ࡚ྲྀࡾ௜ࡃ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡢỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶࡣࡑࡢ
༢⣧
㍈๛ᛶࡼࡾࡶపୗࡍࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒᑐ㇟࡜ࡍࡿ⿵๛๛ᛶ್ࡢ
⠊ᅖࢆ㸪Ku/(EIf /l3) ≤3㸪KE/(GKf /d) ≤0.1 ࡜ࡍࡿࠋ n=1 n=2 n=1 n=2
ࡲࡓ㸪ᯫᵓ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᱱᮦ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡣᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ๛ᛶ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪 (a) Simple Support (b) Fixed Support
Fig.6 Assumption of lateral and rotational deformations
ḟᘧࡢࡼ࠺࡟⾲ࡉࢀࡿࠋ
(2)
K MT I GKc 2h
ୖࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡟ᅽ⦰ᛂຊࡀస⏝ࡍࡿሙྜࢆ Type A㸪ᘬᙇᛂຊࡀస⏝ࡍ
ࡇࡇ࡛㸪MT㸸ᱱࡢᶓ᭤ࡆኚᙧ࡟ࡼࡿ᭤ࡆ᤟ࡾ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ㸪I㸸ᶓ
ࡿሙྜࢆ Type B ࡜ࡍࡿࠋ
᭤ࡆኚᙧ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚⏕ࡌࡿ࢙࢘ࣈ୰ᚰ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᅇ㌿ゅ㸪GKc㸸ᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ
2.2 ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ
᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡿ St Venant ᤟ࡾ๛ᛶ㸪h㸸㝵㧗࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡑࡢ㝿㸪ᩥ⊩ 2)࡛
ᮏㄽᩥ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡢᐃ⩏ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪➼
ࡣ᭤ࡆ᤟ࡾᐃᩘࡣᴫ␎ⓗ࡟ H ᙧ㗰ᰕࡢሙྜ㸪ᰕ᩿㠃ࡢ᤟ࡾᐃᩘ࡟ᱱ
᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺస⏝᫬ࡢᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࡀ n=1 ࠿ࡽ n=2 ࡬⛣⾜ࡍࡿ࡜ࡁ
ࡢୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᤟ࡾᐃᩘࢆຍ࠼ࡓࡶࡢ࡜ࡋ㸪⟽ᙧ㗰ᰕࡢሙྜ㸪ᰕ
ࡢ⿵๛๛ᛶࢆᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶ࡜ᐃ⩏ࡍࡿࠋn ࡣᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻḟᩘ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪
᩿㠃ࡢ᤟ࡾᐃᩘ࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞᤟ࡾᐃᩘࡢ௬ᐃ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚㸪
཯ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜ㸪Fig.5 ྑࡢࡼ࠺࡟ n=1 ࡛ sine ༙Ἴᙧ㸪n=2 ࡛ sine ୍
ᰕᱱ᥋ྜ㒊ࡢࡳࢆྲྀࡾฟࡋࡓࣔࢹࣝࡢᩘ್ゎᯒࢆ⾜࠸㸪ࡑࡢጇᙜᛶ
Ἴᙧ࡜࡞ࡿࠋFig.5 ᕥ࡟୍౛࡜ࡋ࡚ H-500×250×9×16㸪O1=200 ࡟࠾ࡅ
ࢆ☜ㄆࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋFig.3 ࡟㸪ᰕᱱ⪏ຊẚ Mpc /Mpb ࡜ᐇ㝿ࡢᰕᮦ࡟ࡼࡿ
ࡿ Type A㸪Type B ࡢᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ᭤⥺ࢆࡑࢀࡒࢀ⅊Ⰽ⥺㸪㯮⥺࡜
ᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶ K ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋᐇ㝿ࡢ᩿㠃ᑍἲ 20)ࢆࡶ࡜࡟㸪ᰕࡢ✀㢮
ࡋ࡚♧ࡍࠋType B ࡢᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ᭤⥺ୖࡢᚲせỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡀ
ࡣ⟽ᙧ㗰ᰕ(ᰕࡏ࠸ 300~600mm)㸪୰ᖜ H ᙧ㗰ᰕ(ᰕࡏ࠸ 400~600mm)㸪
₞㏆ࡍࡿ࡜ࡁࡢ KE/(GKf/d)ࢆ kE,min㸪ᚲせᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡀ₞㏆ࡍࡿ࡜
ᗈᖜ H ᙧ㗰ᰕ(ᰕࡏ࠸ 350~500mm)㸪㝵㧗ࡣ 3~5m ࢆ᳨ウᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓࠋ
ࡁࡢ Ku/(EIf/l3)ࢆ ku,min ࡜ࡍࡿࠋࡇࢀࡽࡢᗙᶆ Kmin(ku,min㸪kE,min)ࢆࠐ࡛♧
ᰕᱱ⪏ຊẚࢆ Mpc /Mpb=1.3~2.0 ࡜᝿ᐃࡍࡿ࡜㸪ᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡾ
ࡋ㸪ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚࢆタᐃࡍࡿ㝿ࡢᣦᶆ࡜ࡍࡿࠋཎⅬཬࡧ kmin
K akN mm/rad ࡀᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡢ⠊ᅖ࡜࡞ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪୍⯡ⓗ࡟
ࢆ㏻ࡿ┤⥺࡜㸪Type A㸪Type B ࡢᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ᭤⥺࡜ࡢ஺Ⅼࢆᇶ
ࡣᰕ௙ཱྀ㒊ศ࡟ࡣ᪉ྥ࡟ᱱࡀྲྀࡾ௜ࡃࡓࡵ㸪
ᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡢୗ㝈್ࢆ
‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ AK0(Aku0㸪AkE)㸪BK0 (Bku0㸪BkE0)࡜ᐃ⩏ࡍࡿ(ᅗ୰ࡢ
K  ࡢ 1/4 ࡛ ࠶ ࡿ 25 Ҹ  ࡜ ࡍ ࡿ ࠋ ࡇ ࡢ ࡇ ࡜ ࠿ ࡽ 㸪 K
‫ڧ‬㸪‫ࠋ)ڦ‬௨㝆㸪ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ๭ྜࢆࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ࡜ࡍ
 akN mm/rad ࡀᮏㄽᩥࡢᑐ㇟⠊ᅖ࡜࡞ࡿࠋࡇࡢ࡜ࡁ㸪᩿㠃
ࡿࠋ
ࡢ㐪࠸ࡀᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅᣲື࡟ཬࡰࡍᙳ㡪ࢆ᳨ウࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡟㸪ᱱࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬
2.3 ⌮᝿ⓗ࡞ቃ⏺᮲௳࡟࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢᑟฟ
ᢠ࡜᭤ࡆ᢬ᢠࡢ๭ྜF2(=(GK/d2)/EIy(S/l)2)ࢆᣦᶆ࡜ࡋ࡚ 3 ✀㢮ࡢ᩿㠃
ᮏ⠇࡛ࡣ㸪➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ H ᙧ㗰ᱱ࡟௵ពࡢỈᖹ⿵๛
ࢆ 㑅 ᐃ ࡋ ࡓ ࠋ ᑐ ㇟ ࡜ ࡋ ࡓ ᱱ ᩿ 㠃 ࡣ ⣽ ᖜ H ᙧ ᩿ 㠃 ࡛ ࠶ ࡿ H-
๛ᛶཬࡧᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡀྲྀࡾࡘࡃሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓ
600×200×11×17 ཬ ࡧ H-500×250×9×16 㸪 ୰ ᖜ H ᙧ ᩿ 㠃 ࡛ ࠶ ࡿ H-
ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆồࡵࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪⌮᝿ⓗ࡞ቃ⏺᮲௳࡜ࡣ཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶
390×300×10×16㸪᩿㠃ᙧ≧ẚ b/h ࡣ 0.33㸪0.5㸪0.77 ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪
඲ᅛᐃࡢሙྜࢆᣦࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ H
GKb=2GKf+GKw㸪EIy=2EIf ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Kw ࡣ࢙࢘ࣈࡢ᤟ࡾᐃᩘ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᱱ
ᙧ㗰ᱱࡀᶓᗙᒅࡍࡿ࡜ࡁࡢ࣏ࢸࣥࢩ࢚ࣕࣝࢿࣝࢠ࣮U ࡣᩥ⊩ 11)ࢆཧ
ࡢᶓᗙᒅ⣽㛗ẚO1(௨㝆⣽㛗ẚ࡜࿧ࡪ)ࡣ㸪ᩥ⊩ 10)࡜ྠᵝ㸪ḟᘧ࡛ᐃ
⪃࡟(4)ᘧࡢࡼ࠺࡟♧ࡉࢀࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪Γ㸸ᱱࡢ᭤ࡆ᤟ࡾᐃᩘ㸪KE㸸ᱱ
⩏ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡜ࡋ㸪ᮏ❶࡛ࡣO1=200㸪240㸪280 ࢆᩘ್ゎᯒᑐ㇟࡜ࡍࡿࠋ
ࡢ᤟ࡾᐃᩘ㸪M㸸ᱱ୧➃࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ㸪u㸸ᱱࡢỈᖹኚ
l If Aw
O1 (3a) i1 ࠉ (3b)㸪 A1 Af   (3c) ᙧ㸪E㸸ᱱࡢ᤟ࢀኚᙧ࡛࠶ࡿࠋFig.6 ࡟♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡟㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧ u㸪᤟ࢀ
i1 A1 6
ࡇࡇ࡛㸪i1㸸ᶓᗙᒅ᩿㠃஧ḟ༙ᚄ㸪A1㸸H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢ᭷ຠ᩿㠃✚㸪Af㸸ࣇࣛ ኚᙧEࢆ୕ゅ㛵ᩘ࡛㏆ఝⓗ࡟௬ᐃࡍࡿࠋ཯ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜ㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧ

ࣥࢪ᩿㠃✚㸪Aw㸸࢙࢘ࣈ᩿㠃✚࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࡣ⮬⏤➃㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧࡣᅛᐃ➃࡜௬ᐃࡍࡿࠋ᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ୍ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ

ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ᑐ㇟࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ H ᙧ᩿㠃ࡣ஧㍈ᑐ⛠࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪
Fig.1 ሙྜ㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧ㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧ࡜ࡶ࡟ᅛᐃ➃࡜௬ᐃࡍࡿࠋ᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ஧

࡟♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡞ᶓᗙᒅ᫬ࡢỈᖹཬࡧ᤟ࢀኚᙧࡣࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᭤ࡆኚᙧ࡜ ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟࠾࠸࡚㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧ㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧ࡜ࡶ࡟ᱱ➃࠿ࡽᱱ୰ኸࡲ࡛

ࡋ࡚⾲ࡉࢀࡿࠋࡑࡇ࡛㸪ᱱ➃࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ M ࢆ㸪ୖ ࡟╔┠ࡍࡿ࡜㸪ᱱ➃ࡣᅛᐃ㸪ᱱ୰ኸࡣᅇ㌿⮬⏤࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡋࡓ

ୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pi ࡟⨨ࡁ᥮࠼ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪i=1㸪2 ࡣࡑ ࡀࡗ࡚㸪ኚᙧࡢᑐ⛠ᛶࢆ⪃៖ࡋ㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧ㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧ࡜ࡶ࡟ᱱ୧➃

ࢀࡒࢀୖ㸪ୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⿵๛ᮦࡣୖࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡟ྲྀࡾ௜ࡃ ࠿ࡽᱱ୰ኸࡲ࡛ࢆ୍➃ᅛᐃ㸫୍➃⮬⏤࡜࡞ࡿἼᙧ࡜ࡍࡿ࡜㸪ࡇࡢ⠊

ࡶࡢ࡜ࡋ㸪⿵๛ᮦࡀྲྀࡾ௜ࡃࣇࣛࣥࢪࢆୖࣇࣛࣥࢪ㸪⿵๛ᮦࡀྲྀࡾ௜ ᅖࡢᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࡣ 0.7™0.5l ࡜࡞ࡿࠋ(5a)~(6)ᘧ࡟㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧࡢ௬ᐃ us㸪

࠿࡞࠸ࣇࣛࣥࢪࢆୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡜࿧ࡪࠋFig.4 ࡟♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡟㸪⿵๛ഃࡢ uf㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧࡢ௬ᐃE f ࢆ♧ࡍࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪ῧ࠼Ꮠࡣୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ➃㒊ࡢ

─ 147 ─
  ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲ࡟ࡼࡿᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜
1 l
U
2 ³0
^ 2
EI yucc2  E*E cc2  GKb E c2  Muc2  kE E 2  kuu0 dx ` (4)
nS
us Asin x (5a) u1  u2 u1  u2
l u    (7a) E    (7b)
2 d
­
°sin 2 § 10nS · x § 13l ·
° ¨ ¸ ¨0 d x  ¸ E  D1 W1E    (8a) E  D2 W 2 E    (8b)
© 13l ¹ © 20n ¹
°
§
°sin  10 nS 10 S · § 13 l l ·
x dx ¸
° ¨© 7l 7 ¹
¸ ¨
© 20n n¹
°
 n  1 l · ­ 2 Dw ½
2
° § nS · §l 6 Dw
° § nS · °
A ® 1 sin ¨
n
uf x  nS ¸ ¨ dx ¸ (5b) ®GK f ¨
d
¸  ¾
© l ¹ ©n n ¹ °
¯ © l ¹ d ¿°
° W1 (9a) [ᩥ⊩ 13)(8a)ᘧ]
° ­ 2
½ ­ 2
4 Dw ½
2

° 1n1 sin ¨§ 10nS x  10  n  1 S ¸¨

·§  n  1 l  20n  13 l · ° § nS · 4 Dw °° § nS · ° § Dw ·
dx ¸ ®GK f ¨ ¸   kE ¾ ®GK f ¨ ¸  ¾  4¨ ¸
° ° © l ¹ d °¯° © l ¹ d ° © d ¹
© 7l 7 ¹© n 20n ¹ ¯ ¿ ¿
°
° 2 § 10nS 10nS · §  20n  13 l ·
° 1 sin ¨ 
n 1
x ¸ ¨ d x dl¸
6 Dw °­ °½
2

¯° © 13l 13 ¹ © 20n ¹ § nS · 2 Dw
®GK f ¨ ¸   kE ¾
d ¯° © l ¹ d ¿°
­ 2 nS § l · W2 (9b) [ᩥ⊩ 13)(8b)ᘧ]
°sin l x ¨0 d x d
2
¸ ­° § nS ·
2
4 Dw °½ °­ § nS ·
2
4 Dw ½° § Dw ·
° © 2n ¹ ®GK f ¨ ¸   k E ¾ ®GK f ¨ ¸  ¾  4¨ ¸
°¯ © l ¹ d °¿ °¯ © l ¹ d °¿ © d ¹
°° nS § l 2n  1 ·
Ef B ®sin x ¨ xd l ¸ (6)
° l © 2n 2n ¹
° nS § 2n  1 · GKb GK w  (W1  W 2 )GK f (10)
°(1)2 n1 sin 2 x¨ l  x dl¸
¯° l © 2n ¹

2  n2  5n  15 ª EI f § nS ·2 °
2 2 º
­ ku § l ·2 °
½ ­  n  5 ½ ku § l ·2 ­ n5 § l · ½
2 2 2 2 2
ku § l · ° § nS · GK n  6 § l · n  6 kE § l · ° ° GK n  6 kE § l · °
n 1 P r ¨ ¸  ® ¨ ¸ ¾  « ¨ ¸ ® EI f ¨ ¸  2  ku ¨ ¸  2 ¨ ¸ W1 ¾  ¨ ¸ ® 2  2 ¨ ¸ W1  ku ¨ ¸ ¾» (11)
2 © nS ¹ °
¯ 2 © nS ¹ °
¿ 5 « 2 © l ¹ °
¯ 2 © l ¹ d 5 © nS ¹ 10 d © nS ¹ °
¿ 4 © nS ¹ °
¯ d 10 d © nS ¹ 500 © nS ¹ °»¼
¿
¬

2
3 §l ·
2
§ 3 § l ·2 · §S · °
2
­ §S ·
2
GK 3 kE § l ·
2
3 §l · ½
2
° 3 § l · ­ GK 3 kE § l · ½
2 2
°
1 2 P r ku ¨ ¸  ¨ ku ¨ ¸ ¸  8EI f ¨ ¸ ®2 EI f ¨ ¸  2 
¨8 ©S ¹ ¸ 2 ¨ ¸ W 1  ku ¨ ¸ ¾  ku ¨ ¸ ® 2  2 ¨ ¸ W1 ¾ (12)
8 ©S ¹ © ¹ © l ¹ °
¯ © l ¹ d 4 d © S ¹ 8 © S ¹ °
¿ 4 © S ¹ ¯ d 4 d © S ¹ °
¿

(13)
2
B § l ·
2
­
°B § l · ½
2
° EI f § nS ·2 °­ A 2
§ nS · GK k E § l ·2 ku § l · ½
2
°
2
§ l · ­ GK k E § l ·2 ½ °
n P2 r ku ¨ ¸  ® ku ¨ ¸ ¾  2A ¨ ¸ ® EI f ¨ ¸  2 B 2¨ ¸ W1  ¨ ¸ ¾  Bku ¨ ¸ ® 2 B 2¨ ¸ W1 ¾
4 © nS ¹ °
¯ 4 © nS ¹ °
¿ 2 © l ¹ °
¯ 2 © l ¹ d d © nS ¹ 2 © nS ¹ °
¿ © nS ¹ ¯ d d © nS ¹ ° ¿
A 0.30.36n  2.9 , B 0.07n  0.6

᮲௳ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪s㸪f ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀ⮬⏤➃(simple support)㸪ᅛᐃ➃(fixed Type A Type B

KE/(GKf /d)=0.01 KE/(GKf /d)=0.005
support)ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ཯ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜࡣ(5a)㸪(6)ᘧࡢ us㸪E f㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ Warping fixed Warping fixed
Vcr(kN/mm2) Fully fixed Fully fixed
୍ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢሙྜࡣ(6)ᘧࡢ sin Ἴ࡜ྠࡌἼᙧ࡛ᮍᐃಀᩘࢆ A ࡜ࡋࡓ 1
Transition points
uf (n=1)㸪(6)ᘧࡢEf (n =1)㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ஧ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢሙྜࡣ(5b)ᘧࡢ uf of buckling mode
Type A
(nӋ2)㸪(5b)ᘧࡢ sin Ἴ࡜ྠࡌἼᙧ࡛ᮍᐃಀᩘࢆ B ࡜ࡋࡓEf (nӋ2)࡜ࡍ 0.75 Type B
ࡿࠋ(7a)㸪(7b)ᘧ࡟㸪ᱱࡢỈᖹኚᙧ u㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧE࡜ୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈ
ᖹኚᙧ ui㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧEi ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋᱱࡢỈᖹኚᙧ㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧࡣ㸪 0.5
ୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧࠊ᤟ࢀኚᙧࡢᖹᆒ࡛ồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ
ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ᫬㸪ࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠཬࡧ⿵๛ᮦࡢᅇ㌿᢬ᢠ࡟క࠸㸪 Ku/(EIf/l3)=0.10
0.25
H-500™250™9™16
࢙࢘ࣈࡢ᭤ࡆኚᙧDi ࡀ⏕ࡌࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ࡇࢀࢆ(8a)㸪(8b)ᘧ࡜ࡋ࡚⾲
0 100 200 300 O
ࡍ 13)ࠋ(9a)㸪(9b)ᘧࡢWi ࡣ࢙࢘ࣈࡢ᭤ࡆኚᙧ࡟క࠺᤟ࡾ๛ᛶཬࡧᅇ㌿⿵ Fig.7 Relationship between Elastic Bucking Stress and
๛๛ᛶࡢపୗ⋡࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ࡇࢀࡽࡣ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ Lateral Slenderness Ratio
H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ࡛࠶ࡿᩥ⊩ 13)ࡢ(8a)㸪(8b)ᘧ࡜ࡋ࡚ᑟ࠿
ࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡶ㸪(8a)㸪(8b)ᘧ࡟Wi ࢆ㐺⏝ࡋ㸪ᩥ⊩ 13)ࡢ(8a)㸪(8b) 㛵ᩘࢆタᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ(13)ᘧ࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
(9b)ᘧ࡜ࡋ࡚෌ᥖࡍࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪
ᘧࢆ(9a)㸪 n ࡣᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻḟᩘ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ⌮᝿ⓗ࡞ቃ⏺᮲௳࡟࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘ Vcr(kN/mm2)࡜⣽
Fig.7 ࡟㸪
ࡲࡓ㸪(4)ᘧ୰ࡢ GK ࡣWi ࢆ㐺⏝ࡍࡿ࡜(10)ᘧࡢࡼ࠺࡟⾲ࡏࡿࠋ 㛗ẚOࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋᅗ୰㯮⥺ࡣ Type A㸪⅊Ⰽ⥺ࡣ Type B ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪
(4)ᘧ࡟(5a)㸪(5b)㸪(6)ᘧࡢኚ఩ࡢ௬ᐃࢆ௦ධࡋ㸪࢙࢘ࣈࡢ᭤ࡆኚᙧ ᐇ⥺ࡣ཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪◚⥺ࡣ᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢሙྜࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣ
࡟క࠺᤟ࡾ๛ᛶཬࡧᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶࡢపୗ⋡((9a)㸪(9b)㸪(10)ᘧ)ࢆ⪃៖ ᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡢᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘVcr ࡣḟᘧ࡛ồࡵࡿ
ࡋࡓ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ᘧࢆ A㸪B ࡛೫ᚤศࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛㸪⌮᝿ⓗ࡞ቃ⏺᮲௳ ࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ
࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡀồࡵࡽࢀࡿࠋ V cr n Pj / A1 (14)

(11)~(13)ᘧࡣᑟฟࡋࡓᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ nPj ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪j=1㸪2 㐃⥆⿵๛ࡉࢀࡓሙྜ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡢ኱ࡁࡉཬࡧ⣽㛗ẚ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ᗙᒅ

ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀ཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃࢆ⾲ࡋ㸪➨୍㡯ࡢ➢ྕࡀṇࡢ࡜ࡁࢆ ࣮ࣔࢻࡀኚ໬ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᅗ୰ࡢ‫ۂ‬㸪‫ࡣۂ‬㸪ࡑࢀࡒࢀ Type A㸪Type
Type A㸪㈇ࡢ࡜ࡁࢆ Type B ࡜ࡍࡿࠋ࡞࠾㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃ୍࡛ḟࡢᗙᒅࣔ B ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻ⛣⾜Ⅼࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋType A ࡛ࡣỈᖹ⿵๛๛
࣮ࢻ࡜࡞ࡿᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜 1P2 ࡣ(12)ᘧ࡜ࡋ㸪஧ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ௨ୖ࡜࡞ࡿ ᛶẚ Ku/(EIf/l3)=0.10㸪ᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶẚ KE/(GKf/d)=0.01㸪Type B ࡛ࡣ
ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜 nP2 ࡣ๓㏙ࡢ㏻ࡾ㸪୍ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢሙྜ࡜␗࡞ࡿኚ఩ Ku/(EIf/l3)=0.10㸪KE/(GKf/d)=0.005 ࡜࡞ࡿࡼ࠺࡟⿵๛๛ᛶ ku㸪kEࢆᐃࡵ࡚

─ 148 ─
࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ࡜ࡁ㸪ୖグࡢ Ku/(EIf/l3)ࡣ l=13000mm(O1=200)ࡢ࡜ࡁࡢ್࡛ ẚࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜(‫ڦ‬㸪‫)ی‬㸪㯮⥺ࡣ༴㝤ഃࡢホ౯࡜࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣᚋ
࠶ࡾ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡢ⣽㛗ẚ࡟ࡼࡽࡎ➼ࡋ࠸್࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ ㏙ࡢ Appendix Fig.2 ࡟♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡟㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆ
ᶓᗙᒅ᭤⥺࡟╔┠ࡍࡿ࡜㸪O≤ࡢሙྜ㸪Oࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᶓᗙᒅ ᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡿᙳ㡪ࡀపୗࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚㸪(16a)~(16c)
ᛂຊᗘࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪O≥ࡢሙྜ㸪Oࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᶓᗙ ᘧࡢ㛵ಀ(s =0 ࡢ࡜ࡁW=1㸪 W =0㸪s =1 ࡢ࡜ࡁW=4㸪 W =1)ࢆ‶ࡓࡋࡘ
ᒅᛂຊᗘࡣᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ⛣⾜࡜࡜ࡶ࡟୍ᐃ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡉࡽ࡟㸪 ࡘ 㸪 (17b) ᘧ ࡛ 㐃 ⥆ ⿵ ๛ ࡟ క ࠺ ᶓ ᭤ ࡆ ᣊ ᮰ ᗘ ࡢ ప ୗ ࢆ ⪃ ៖ ࡋ ࡓ
Oࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅᛂຊ (17a)~(17c)ᘧࢆᅗ୰⅊Ⰽ⥺࡛♧ࡍࠋࡍ࡭࡚ࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣ⅊Ⰽ⥺ࢆୖ
ᗘࡢᕪࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣOࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜㸪ᱱࡣኚᙧࡋࡸࡍࡃ ᅇࡾ㸪Ᏻ඲ഃ࡜࡞ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ࡇࢀ௨㝆ࡣ(17)ᘧࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿࠋ
2
࡞ࡾ㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘ࡟ཬࡰࡍᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ W 1 3 K § S · EI
W (17a)㸪 W 4 (17b)㸪 s ¨ ¸ y (17c)
ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᑟฟࡋࡓᘧ࡛࠶ࡿྛ⥺ࡣᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺ࡜ 3 1 s 2h © l ¹

ᴫࡡᑐᛂࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᑟฟࡋࡓᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢጇᙜᛶࢆ Fig.9 ࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘVcr ࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆ

♧ࡍࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ ๛ᛶ K ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ(a)ࡣᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶẚࢆᅛᐃࡋ㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ
2.4 ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ୗ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛㹆ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ ẚࢆኚ໬ࡉࡏ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ(b)ࡣỈᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶẚࢆᅛᐃࡋ㸪ᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶ

ࡢᑟฟ ẚࢆኚ໬ࡉࡏ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ㯮ᐇ⥺ࡣ Fig.4 ࡟♧ࡍ Type A㸪⅊Ⰽᐇ⥺ࡣ Type

2.3 ⠇ࡢ⌮᝿ⓗ࡞ቃ⏺᮲௳࡟࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ㋃ࡲ࠼࡚ᮏ⠇ B ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ(15)ᘧࢆ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ซ

࡛ࡣ㸪ᐇ㝿ࡢᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ᳨ウࡍࡿࠋᩥ⊩ 2) ౛࡟♧ࡍ㏻ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓᱱ᩿㠃ࡣ⣽ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃࡛࠶ࡿ H-

࡛ࡣ㸪H ᙧ㗰ᱱ࡟⟽ᙧ㗰ᰕࡀྲྀࡾ௜ࡃሙྜ㸪ᱱ➃ࡢ཯ࡾᣊ᮰ᗘࡣ࡯ 500×250×9×16㸪ᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓ⣽㛗ẚࡣO1=200 ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣᙎᛶᶓᗙ

ࡰ཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣࡇࡢࡼ ᒅᛂຊᗘVcr㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡢᑐᩘ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪 K 㸻0 ࡛཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪

࠺࡞ሙྜ㸪ᱱ➃ࢆ཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜௬ᐃࡍࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵ㸪⟽ᙧ㗰ᰕࡀྲྀࡾ K ࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡟㏆࡙࠸࡚࠸ࡿࠋFig.9 (a)㸪(b)࡜
௜ࡃᱱࡢᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳ࡣ཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ㛫ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡜ ࡶ࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶ K 㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ Ku/(EIf/l3)㸪ᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶẚ
࡞ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡣᩥ⊩ 3)ࡼࡾḟᘧࡢࡼ࠺࡟⾲ KE/(GKf/d)ࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡀୖ᪼ࡍࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ

ࡏࡿࠋ
Pcr (n P2 n P1 )W n P1
ࡇࡇ࡛㸪 W ࢆᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡜ᐃ⩏ࡍࡿ࡜㸪ḟࡢ(16a)ᘧ࡛⾲ࡏࡿࠋᘧ
୰ࡢWࡣ㸪➃㒊ࡤࡡ࡟ࡼࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪(16b)ᘧ࡟♧
ࡍࡼ࠺࡟㸪➃㒊ᅇ㌿๛ᛶẚ s ࡢ኱ࡁࡉ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ᅇ㌿⮬⏤࠿ࡽᅇ㌿ᅛ
ᐃࡢሙྜ࡛ 1~4 ࡢ㛫࡜࡞ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪s ࡣᅽ⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ᭤ࡆ๛
ᛶ࡟ᑐࡍࡿᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡢẚ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪(16c)ᘧ࡟♧ࡍ࡜࠾ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
W 1
W (16a)㸪 W 4
3 1  2s
nP1㸪nP2 ࡣ๓⠇࡛ᑟฟࡋࡓ཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅ
Ⲵ㔜ᘧ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪(15)ᘧࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ
ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ W ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ㛫ࡢᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜
࡜࡞ࡿࠋ
Fig.8 ࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ W ࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶẚ s ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ㯮ᐇ⥺
ࡣ(16a)~(16c)ᘧ㸪ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋW =0 ࡣ཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪
W =1 ࡣ᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪s ࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚ 1 ࡟཰᮰ࡍࡿࠋࣉ
ࣟࢵࢺࡣ㯮⥺࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ㄗᕪ 10%௨ෆ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Type A ࡛Ỉᖹ⿵๛๛ᛶ
⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࣉࣟࢵࢺ࡜ẚ㍑ࡍࡿ࡜ᴫࡡᑐᛂࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪(15)ᘧࡢጇᙜ
(15) ᛶࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
3. ➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆཷࡅࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ୗ࡛ࡢ㐃⥆⿵๛㹆ᙧ㗰ᱱ
ࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅ
3.1 ᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒᴫせ
ᩘ್ゎᯒࣔࢹࣝ㸪ᑐ㇟᩿㠃ࡣ๓❶࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᮏ❶࡛ࡣᙎረᛶ
3 K §S ·
2
኱ኚᙧゎᯒࢆ⾜࠺ࡓࡵ㸪Table 1 ࡟♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡟㗰✀ࡣ SS400 ࢆ᝿ᐃ
(16b)㸪 s ¨ ¸ EI y (16c)
2h ©l¹ ࡋ㸪H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᮦᩱ≉ᛶ࡟ࡣࣂ࢖ࣜࢽ࢔ᆺࢆ㐺⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⿵๛ᮦ
࡛࠶ࡿࣂࢿせ⣲ࡣᙎᛶ࡜ࡋ㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ⿵๛㛫㝸 l’ࡣ 2 ❶࡜
ྠᵝ㸪250mm ࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᱱࡢึᮇ୙ᩚࡣᩥ⊩ 6)࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪
Fig.10 ࡟♧ࡍ㠃እ᪉ྥ࡟᭱኱್ࡀ l/2500 ࡜࡞ࡿ sine ༙Ἴ㸪᭱኱್ࡀ
l/10000 ࡜࡞ࡿ sine ୍Ἴࢆ㊊ࡋྜࢃࡏࡓỈᖹኚᙧ࡜㸪x ㍈ᅇࡾ࡛
l/2500/(d/2)࡜࡞ࡿ sine ༙Ἴࡢ᤟ࢀኚᙧ࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢึᮇ୙ᩚࡣ㸪
ᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ࡟ࡼࡿ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡜ 2 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟┦ᙜࡋ㸪⡆౽࡞ึ
ᮇ୙ᩚᙧ≧࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡑࡋ࡚㸪ึᮇ୙ᩚᙧ≧ࡢ㐪࠸ࡀᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧
࡟ᙳ㡪ࢆ୚࠼࡞࠸ࡼ࠺࡟㸪ᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳ࡸ⿵๛๛ᛶ࡟ࡼࡽࡎྠࡌࣔ

Type A Type B Type A Type B

Type A Type B 3 3
K u /(EI f/l )=0.1
3
KE /(GK f /d)=0.03 KE /(GK f /d)=0.03 K u /(EI f/l )=0.5
KE /(GK f /d)=0.03 Ku /(EI f /l )=0.1
3 3
K u /(EI f/l )=1.0
3
K u /(EI f/l )=0.5 KE /(GK f /d)=0.03 KE /(GK f /d)=0.03
Ku /(EI f /l )=1 KE /(GK f /d)=0.03
3 3
K u /(EI /l )=0.5
f
3
K u /(EI f/l )=0.1 KE /(GK f /d)=0.01 KE /(GK f /d)=0.01
Ku /(EI f /l )=0.5 KE /(GK f /d)=0.01
W 3 3
K u /(EI f/l )=0.1
3
Ku /(EI f/l )=0.05 KE /(GK f /d)=0.003 KE /(GK f /d)=0.003
Ku /(EI f /l )=0.1 KE /(GK f /d)=0.003
1 0.8 Vcr (kN/mm2)
Vcr(kN/mm2)
0.75

0.5 0.4
Eqs.(16a)~(16c)
0.25 Eqs.(17a)~(17c)
H-500™250™9™16, O1=200 H-500™250™9™16, O =200 H-500™250™9™16, O=200
0 2 4 s 0 2 4 6 0 2 4 log K (kN䞉mm/rad)
Fig.8 Relationship between Ratios of Fork (a) Lateral Rigidity (b) Rotational Rigidity
Restraint and Rotational Rigidity Fig.9 Relationship Between Elastic Bucking Stress For H-shaped Beams with
for Beam Ends to Flexural Rigidity Warping Restraint and Ratio of the Rotational Rigidity for Beam Ends
for Compressed Flanges

─ 149 ─
࣮ࢻ࡟タᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ᭱኱ึᮇ୙ᩚ㔞ࡣ㸪᪤ ࡢᩥ⊩ Table1 Material Properties
z a tan 1 (u d ) E tan 1 (u d )
2)ࡢ↓⿵๛ࡢᱱࡢᐇ㦂⤖ᯝ࡜ᑐᛂࡍࡿࡼ࠺࡟ᐃࡵ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᩥ⊩ 11)࡟ E(N/mm 2 ) 2.06ʹ105 l Sx l 2S x
u sin  sin
ᐇ㦂⤖ᯝ࡜ᩘ್ゎᯒࣔࢹࣝ࡜ࡢẚ㍑ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᩥ⊩ 21)࡛ Vy (N/mm 2 ) 294 w 2500 l 10000 l
y
ࡶ sine ༙Ἴ࡜୍Ἴࡢ㊊ࡋྜࢃࡏ࡟ࡼࡿึᮇ୙ᩚࡀ୚࠼ࡽࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪 Vu (N/mm 2 ) 436 d
x
Est (N/mm 2 ) s( s  d ) 2 s2  s  d 
ᶓᗙᒅ࡟ᑐࡍࡿᙎረᛶゎᯒࡢึᮇ୙ᩚ࡜ࡋ࡚ጇᙜ࡛࠶ࡿ࡜⪃࠼ࡽࢀ 2.74ʹ103 w D1  D2
s d2 d2
ࡿࠋᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ࡟࠾ࡅࡿไᚚ᪉ἲࡣ㸪ᘼ㛗ቑศἲࡢ 1 ࡘ࡛࠶
Fig.10 Initial Imperfection of Elasto-plastic
ࡿ Ricks ἲࢆ᥇⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ Buckling Analyses
3.2 ᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧ Warping Fixed Support W2 Fully Fixed Support
Figs.11㸪12 ࡟㸪Fig.4 ࡟♧ࡍ Type A㸪Type B ࡑࢀࡒࢀ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ H P 㻛P Pi㻛Py
ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛶ≧ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ᩿㠃ࡣ୍౛࡜ࡋ࡚㸪⣽ᖜ H ᙧ 1 i y
0.8 b/h=0.5 b/h=0.5
᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16㸪O1=240 ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ(཯ O =240 O =240
0.6 
ࡾᅛᐃ㸪 W 2 =0.5㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃ)ࢆࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪(a) 0.5K0 0.5K0
0.4
࡛ࡣᅽ⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢస⏝㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pi ࢆ㝆అ㍈Ⲵ㔜 Py (=Vy A1)࡛㝖ࡋ 0.2
ࡓ್㸪(b),(c)࡛ࡣ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜᫬࡟ྛኚᙧࡀ᭱኱࡜࡞ࡿ఩⨨࡛ࡢ㸪ᮦ 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 T/Ty
㛗࡟ᑐࡍࡿ࢙࢘ࣈ୰ኸࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡢ๭ྜ u/l㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧE ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚
(a) Elasto-plastic Buckling Load (a) Elasto-plastic Buckling Load
࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢ࡜ࡁ㸪స⏝㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pi ࡣ Type A ࡢ࡜ࡁୖࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡟స⏝ - Rotation Angle - Rotation Angle
ࡍࡿ P1㸪Type B ࡢ࡜ࡁୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ P2 ࢆ᥇⏝ࡍࡿࠋ(a)~(c) 4 u/l(%) u/l(%)
3
ࡢᶓ㍈ࡣ㸪y ㍈ᅇࡾࡢᮦ➃ᅇ㌿ゅ Tࢆ㝆అⲴ㔜᫬ࡢᮦ➃ᅇ㌿ゅ Ty ࡛ 2
1
㝖ࡋࡓ್࡛࠶ࡿࠋ(d)ࡢ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜᫬ࡢᮦ㛗࡟ᑐࡍࡿỈᖹ 0 T /Ty
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
ኚᙧࡢẚ ui/l ࡢศᕸ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Type A ࡣୖࣇࣛࣥࢪ u1 ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪Type (b) Lateral Deformation (b) Lateral Deformation
B ࡣୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ u2 ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚♧ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᶓ㍈ࡣᮦ㛗᪉ྥࡢ - Rotation Angle - Rotation Angle
఩⨨ x/l ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ(a)ࡢ‫ࡣۃ‬᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜ࢆ♧ࡋ㸪ࡇࡢⅬࢆᶓᗙᒅࡀ⏕ E(rad) E(rad)
0.8
0.6
ࡌࡿⅬ࡜ᐃ⩏ࡍࡿࠋ(a)ࡼࡾ㸪Type A㸪Type B ࡜ࡶ࡟཯ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙ 0.4
0.2
ྜ㸪ᱱࡢ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡣ㸪㝆అ㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡢ 70㸣⛬ᗘ࡛࠶ࡿࡢ࡟ᑐࡋ㸪 0 T/T
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 y
᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡛ࡣ㸪㝆అ㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡢ 80㸣⛬ᗘ࡟ࡲ࡛ୖ᪼ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ(b)㸪 
(c) Torsional Deformation (c) Torsional Deformation
(c)ࡼࡾ㸪᭱኱Ⲵ㔜Ⅼ௨๓࡛ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜Ỉᖹኚ - Rotation Angle - Rotation Angle
ᙧ㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ᭱኱Ⲵ㔜Ⅼ௨㝆࡛ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ u/l(%) u/l(%)
1
0.5
᮰ᗘࡀᑠࡉ࠸ࡶࡢ࡯࡝㸪Ỉᖹኚᙧࡣῶᑡࡍࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧࡣቑ 0
-0.5
኱ࡋ࡚࠸ࡃࠋࡇࡢ⌮⏤ࡣ௨ୗ࡟♧ࡍ㏻ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜௨㝆㸪 -1 x/l
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

ᱱࡢረᛶ໬ࡀ㐍ᒎࡋᱱࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀపୗࡍࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪⿵๛ᮦࡣ (d) Distribution of Lateral (d) Distribution of Lateral
ᙎᛶࢆಖᣢࡋ㸪⿵๛ഃࡢୖࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡀᢚ࠼ࡽࢀࡿࡇ࡜࡛ Deformation (u1) Deformation (u2)
ୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢࡳ࡛Ỉᖹኚᙧࡀቑຍࡋ㸪ᱱࡢ᤟ࢀኚᙧࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࠋ Fig.11 Lateral Elasto-plastic Fig.12 Lateral Elasto-plastic
୍᪉㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁ࠸ሙྜ㸪ୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡀ୍య࡜࡞ࡗ࡚ᅇ Buckling Behavior (Type A) Buckling Behavior (Type B)
㌿ࡍࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᅇ㌿ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵᱱࡢረᛶ໬௨㝆࡛ࡶୗࣇࣛࣥ
ࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡣቑ኱ࡏࡎ㸪ୖࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ ౛㛵ಀ࡟࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࡶ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
࡛࠶ࡿࠋ Fig.14 ࡟㸪Type A㸪Type B ࡑࢀࡒࢀ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ
(d)ࡼࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ୖୗࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧ ui ⋡࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ᩿㠃㸪⣽㛗ẚ㸪ࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ㸪ซ౛
ࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿഴྥ࡟࠶ࡿࠋୗࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡛ࡶྠᵝࡢ⌧㇟ࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁ ࡣ Fig.13 ࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶
࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᱱ➃࡛ᶓ᭤ࡆᅇ㌿ ࡾ㸪㯮ᐇ⥺ࡣ(15)ᘧࡼࡾồࡵࡽࢀࡓ⌮ㄽ್࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡢᶓᗙᒅᛂ
ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ㸪ui/l ࡢศᕸࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿ࠿ࡽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ຊᗘቑຍ⋡ࡣ㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ᫬࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃ᫬ࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢᕪ
3.3 ᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘホ౯ ศ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰᫬( W =0~1)࡜཯ࡾᅛᐃ᫬ࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂ
Fig.13 ࡟㸪Type A㸪Type B ࡑࢀࡒࢀ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚཯ࡾᅛᐃ᫬࡟ᑐࡍࡿ ຊᗘࡢᕪศࡢ๭ྜࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰᫬࡟࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢ๭ྜ࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢ㛵ಀ ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ⋡ࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪
ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ᩿㠃ࡣ୍౛࡜ࡋ࡚㸪⣽ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16㸪⣽㛗 ࡇࢀࡽࡣ⿵๛๛ᛶ࡟ࡼࡽࡎ୍┤⥺࡟ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ(15)ᘧࡢ㯮⥺࡜
ẚࡣ O1=240 ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࢆࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋྛࣉࣟࢵ ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᴫࡡⰋ࠸ᑐᛂࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᙎረᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛࠶
ࢺࡣᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋFig.13 ࡼࡾ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ ࡗ࡚ࡶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ⋡ࡢ๭ྜ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ㸪(15)ᘧࡢ㐺⏝ࡀྍ⬟
࡞ࡿ࡯࡝㸪ᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢ๭ྜࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀࢃ࠿ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪 ࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
⿵๛๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜㸪ᱱ➃࡟࠾ࡅࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᑠࡉ Fig.15 ࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂ
ࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢ⿵๛๛ᛶ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ ຊᗘ࡜ಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋซ౛ࡣᅗ୰࡟♧ࡍ࡜࠾ࡾ࡛
᫬࡟ᑐࡍࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰᫬ࡢᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢ๭ྜ࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡣẚ ࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒࡼࡾồࡵࡓ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pm ࢆ㸪᭷ຠ᩿

─ 150 ─
㠃✚ A1 ࡛㝖ࡋࡓᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘVmax ࡜㝆అᛂຊᗘVy ࡢẚ㸪ᶓ㍈
No Bracing 0.5K0 K0 1.5K0
10)
ࡣḟᘧ࡛♧ࡍಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚ ࡛࠶ࡿࠋタィつ‽ 9)࡟࠾ࡅࡿ᭤ࡆ Vcr, W /Vcr,w.s Vcr, W /Vcr,w.s
2
ᮦࡢ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚOb ࡟ࡣ㸪㐃⥆⿵๛ຠᯝࡸᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡿᶓ᭤
ࡆᣊ᮰ຠᯝࡀ⪃៖ࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡇ࡛㸪2 ❶࡛⟬ฟࡋࡓ(15)ᘧࡢᙎ 1.5
ᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ Pcr ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓḟᘧࢆಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚ࡜ࡋ࡚ᥦ᱌ࡍ
10 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
ࡿࡇ࡜࡛ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ຠᯝ࡜㐃⥆⿵๛ຠᯝࢆ⪃៖ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡜ࡋࡓࠋ
(a) Type A (b) Type B
Vy Vy Fig.13 Ratio of Lateral Buckling Stress for Fork Restraint to that
Ob (18)
V cr Pcr A1 for Warping Fixed Support
ࡇࡇ࡛㸪ᘧ୰ࡢVy ࡣᅽ⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢ㝆అᛂຊᗘ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᶓ㍈ࡣ(18) (Vcr, W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s) (Vcr, W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s)
ᘧࡢಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚ㸪ᅗ୰ࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ㸪 1

◚⥺ࡣ(18)ᘧ䛾ಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚ䜢㐺⏝䛧䛯㗰ᵓ㐀タィつ‽ 9)ࡢᗙᒅ
0.5
Eq.(15) Eq.(15)
タィᘧࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪Vcr/Vy=0.6~1.0 ࡢᐇ⥺ࡣ⦪㍈Vcr/Vy=0.6 ࡛
ࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢ᥋⥺࡛࠶ࡿࠋᑐ㇟࡜ࡋࡓᱱ᩿㠃㸪⣽㛗ẚ㸪⿵๛ 00 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
๛ᛶࡣ 3.2 ⠇࡟♧ࡍ㏻ࡾ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪⿵๛ᙧᘧ࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆࣃ࣓ࣛ (a) Type A (b) Type B
9)
Fig.14 Rate of Increase in Lateral Buckling Stress between
࣮ࢱ࡜ࡋࡓࠋྛᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡣタィつ‽ ࡢタィᘧࢆୖᅇࡾ㸪 Warping Fixed Support and Complete Fixed Support
Vcr/Vy=0.6 ࡛ࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢ᥋⥺ࢆୖ㝈࡜ࡋ࡚ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᅽ
Vcr/Vy
⦰ഃࣇࣛࣥࢪࡀ㠀ᙎᛶᗙᒅࡍࡿ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡶ⿵๛ᮦࡣᖖ࡟ᙎᛶࢆಖᣢࡍ 1.2
Reference 9)
ࡿ࡜௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣタィᣦ㔪ࡢᗙ 1 tangent
ᒅ᭤⥺࡟ᴫࡡ➼ࡋࡃ࡞ࡿࡢ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚㸪㠀ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣᱱࡢረᛶ໬࡟ Vcr/Vy=0.6)
0.8
క࠸⿵๛ᮦࡢ๛ᛶࡀ┦ᑐⓗ࡟ቑ኱ࡋ㸪ᙎᛶᇦࡼࡾࡶ⿵๛ຠᯝࡀ㧗ࡃ
࡞ࡿࡓࡵ㸪Vcr/VyӍ0.6 ࡛ࡣᩥ⊩ 9)ࡢ➼᭤ࡆࡢᗙᒅ┤⥺ࡼࡾࡶᶓᗙᒅ 0.6
ᛂຊᗘࡀୖ᪼ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡜⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵ㸪ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣ㠀ᙎᛶ
0.4 Warping Fully
⠊ᅖ࡛ࡣ᥋⥺௜㏆࡟ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᶓ᭤䛢ᣊ᮰䛥䜜䛯㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ Fixed
W1 W2 W3
Fixed
㗰ᱱ䛾ᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘ䛿䠈タィᣦ㔪 10)䛾タィᘧ䛾⣽㛗ẚ䛾௦䜟䜚 0.2 No Bracing
Type A
Type B
䛻(18)ᘧ䛾ಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚ䜢㐺⏝䛩䜛䛣䛸䛷䠈⦪㍈ Vcr/Vy<0.6 䛾ᙎᛶ 0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Ob
ᇦ䛷䛿ᴫ䛽ᤊ䛘䜙䜜䠈⦪㍈Vcr/Vy ≥0.6 䛾㠀ᙎᛶᇦ䛷䛿Ᏻ඲ഃ䛾ホ౯䛸䛺
㻌

Fig.15 Evaluation of Lateral Elasto-plastic Buckling Stress

䜛䛣䛸䛜♧䛥䜜䛯䚹


4. ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ୗࡢ㐃⥆⿵๛㹆ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢ⿵๛ຊୖ㝈್ホ౯ ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ BK0 ࡢᱱࢆᑐ㇟࡟ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪(a)࡟ࡣỈᖹ⿵๛ຊ

4.1 ᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒᴫせ
ᮏ❶࡛ࡣ㸪๓❶࡜ྠᵝ㸪ᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒࢆ⾜࠸㸪⿵๛ᮦ࡟స⏝
ࡍࡿỈᖹ⿵๛ຊ࣭⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆᢕᥱࡍࡿࠋゎᯒࣔࢹࣝࡣ Fig.2 ࡜
ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ึᮇ୙ᩚࡣ⿵๛ᮦ࡟࡜ࡗ࡚ཝࡋ࠸᮲௳࡜ࡋ࡚㸪᭱኱್
ࡀ JASS6 ࡛つᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ᭱኱チᐜㄗᕪ l/1000 ࡜࡞ࡿ sine ༙Ἴࢆ
22)
୚࠼ࡿ(Fig.16)ࠋ⿵๛ຊࡢ᳨ウ࡟㛵ࡍࡿ᪤ ࡢ◊✲ 23)24)࡛ࡶྠᵝࡢึ
ᮇ୙ᩚࢆ୚࠼࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪ᮏ❶࡛ࡶࡇࡢึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ᥇⏝ࡋࡓࠋ
ẚ F/Pm㸪(b)࡟ࡣ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ M/Mm ศᕸࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᶓ᭤ࡆ
ᣊ᮰ᗘࢆࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ࡜ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪᳨ウᑐ㇟ࡣ㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ
᮰ᗘ W 2 ( W =0.5)㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛ⥺ࡣᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪
㍈ࡣ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜᫬ࡢ༢఩ᖜᙜࡓࡾࡢ⿵๛ຊẚศᕸ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣᮦ
㛗᪉ྥࡢ఩⨨ x/l ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࡞࠾㸪(a)㸪(b)ࡢ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪⿵๛㛫㝸
l’=250mm ࡈ࡜࡟タࡅࡓࣂࢿせ⣲ 1 ࡘᙜࡓࡾࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ F/Pm㸪
⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ M /Mm ࢆ l’࡛㝖ࡋ࡚༢఩ᖜ(1mm)ࢆ஌ࡌࡓ್࡜ࡋ


ᑐ㇟࡜ࡍࡿᱱ᩿㠃㸪⣽㛗ẚ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡣ 3 ❶࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ

Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊ࡜⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡣ㸪᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜᫬࡟⿵๛ᮦ࡟ാࡃຊ (a)ࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ㸪(b)ࡢ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ࡜ࡶ࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ
ࡲࡓࡣ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊ Fmax ࡣ㸪Fig.17(a)࡟♧ࡍỈᖹ ࡟ࡼࡽࡎᱱ୰ኸ࡛⿵๛ຊẚศᕸࡀ᭱኱࡜࡞ࡾ㸪ᱱ➃࡟ྥ࠿ࡗ࡚ᑠࡉ
⿵๛๛ᛶ ku ࡜ୖࣇࣛࣥࢪࡢỈᖹኚᙧ u ࡢ✚㸪⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ Mmax ࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚⿵๛ຊẚࡢ᭱኱
ࡣ㸪Fig.17(b)࡟♧ࡍᅇ㌿⿵๛๛ᛶ kE࡜⿵๛Ⅼࡢᅇ㌿ኚᙧゅ(E̾Dࡢ ್ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤
✚࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ௨㝆㸪ࡇࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊ࡜⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆ⥲⛠ࡋ࡚㸪 ࡆኚᙧࡀᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡿࡇ࡜࡛ᱱ➃㏆ഐࡢỈᖹኚᙧ u ࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪
⿵๛ຊ࡜࿧ࡪࠋࡲࡓ㸪ホ౯ᣦᶆ࡜ࡋ࡚㸪ᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡼࡾ
ồࡵࡓ㸪ᱱࡢᅽ⦰ࣇࣛࣥࢪ࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pm ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ Fmax ࡢ
ẚ Fmax/Pm ࡜㸪ᱱࡢ᭱኱᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ Mm ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ Mmax ࡢẚ Mmax/Mm
ࢆ⏝࠸ࡿࠋࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢホ౯ᣦᶆࢆỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ㸪⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ
࡜࿧ࡪࠋ
4.2 Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ࣭⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚศᕸ
Fig.18 ࡟㸪ᮦ㛗᪉ྥࡢ⿵๛ຊẚศᕸࢆ♧ࡍࠋ୍౛࡜ࡋ࡚㸪Type B
ࡢሙྜࡢ⣽ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16㸪O1=280㸪2.2 ⠇࡛ᐃ⩏ࡋࡓ
F=ku࣭u㸪M=kE ࣭(E̾D࡜ࡋ࡚ᑟฟࡉࢀࡿ⿵๛ຊࡶపୗࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶

ࡿࠋ
Fig.19 ࡟㸪Type B ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ⿵๛ຊ࡜⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ⣽
ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16㸪O1=280 ࡢᱱࢆ୍౛࡜ࡋ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰
ᗘࢆࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱ࡜ࡍࡿࠋซ౛ࡣ Fig.15 ࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪ᱱࡢ
᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜᫬࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ(a)Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ Fmax/Pm㸪(b)⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ
ẚ Mmax/Mm ࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪Fig.19 ࡢ⿵
๛ຊẚศᕸ࡟♧ࡍ᭱኱್࡛࠶ࡿࠋᶓ㍈ࡢᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ BK0 ࡟
─ 151 ─
ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡽࡎ㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜➼ࡋ࠸⿵๛๛ᛶ್ࢆ㐺⏝ࡍࡿࠋ l Sx
u sin D1
ࡇࡢ⌮⏤ࡣ௨ୗࡢ࡜࠾ࡾ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ2 ❶࡛ㄏᑟࡋࡓᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ 1000 l kE
y E ku
ሙྜࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ(ᘧࡣ㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㐃 x kkuu
uu D2
l
⥆⿵๛+ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ⏝࠸࡚୧⪅ࢆ⿵㛫ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟
Fig.16 Initial (a) F (b) M
ࡼࡾᑟ࠿ࢀࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵ㸪Fig.7 ࡟♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡞㧗ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡬ࡢ⛣⾜Ⅼ Imperfection Fig.17 Definition of Stiffening Force
ࢆồࡵࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ࠋࡲࡓ㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ࡜⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ
Warping Fixed Support W2 Fully Fixed Support
ࡢୖ㝈್ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀ 1.2™10-3%㸪6.5™10-3%⛬ᗘ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᶓ᭤
ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁ࠸࡯࡝㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚཬࡧ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚࡣᑠࡉ F/Pm(㽢10-3%) M/(d兟Pm )(䤸10 %)
-3

ࡃ࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪Fig.8 ࡛ࡶㄝ᫂ࡋࡓ㏻ࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ 2 10
O =280 O=280
ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᅇ㌿ࡀᣊ᮰ࡉࢀ㸪ᱱ➃㏆ഐࡢỈᖹኚᙧ u ࡀ 1 b/h=0.5 5 b/h=0.5
ᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪u ࡢ✚࡛ồࡵࡽࢀࡿ⿵๛ຊࡀᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿ࠿ࡽ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
0 0
ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ 0.5 BK0 ࡲ࡛⿵๛ຊࡣᛴ⃭࡟ୖ᪼ࡍࡿࡀ㸪ࡑࢀ௨ 0 0.25 0.5 0 0.75
0.25 0.51 0.75 1
㝆ࡣ⿵๛ຊ࡜⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡢ㛵ಀࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚␗࡞ࡿഴྥ (a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment
Fig.18 Distribution of Stiffening Force
ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪㐃⥆⿵๛࡟㛵ࡍࡿ᪤ ࡢ◊✲ 6)11)࡛ࡶ 0.5 BK0
Fmax/Pm 㽢10-3(%) Mmax/(d Pm )㽢10-3(%)
࠿ࡽ BK0 ⛬ᗘࡲ࡛⿵๛ຊࡣୖ᪼ࡍࡿࡶࡢࡢ㸪ࡑࢀ௨ୖࡢ್࡟࡞ࡿ࡜
2 H-500™250™9™16 O=280 8
H-500™250™9™16 O=280
పୗࡍࡿ࡜࠸࠺ྠᵝࡢഴྥࡀࡳࡽࢀࡓࠋ๓㏙ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡼ࠺࡟㸪Ỉᖹ
⿵๛ຊ࡜⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀ F=ku࣭u㸪M=kE ࣭(E̾D࡛⾲ࡉ 
1.5 6
ࢀࡿࠋ⿵๛๛ᛶ ku㸪kEࡣ୍ᐃ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡇ࡛㸪Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊࢆồࡵࡿࡓ
ࡵࡢỈᖹኚᙧ u ࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡽࡎ㸪0.5 BK0 ࡛ࣆ࣮ࢡࢆ㏄࠼㸪 1 4

ࡑࡢᚋࡣ BK0 ࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚పୗࡍࡿഴྥࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓ㸪

0.5 2
⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࢆồࡵࡿࡓࡵࡢ⿵๛Ⅼᅇ㌿ኚᙧゅ(E̾Dࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆ
ᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡽࡎ㸪BK0 ࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚పୗࡍࡿഴྥࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
0
00 0.5 1 1.5
0
2 00 0.5 1 1.5 2 K0
ࡉࡽ࡟㸪᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜 Pm ࡟㛵ࡋ࡚ࡣ BK0 ࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚ቑຍࡍ
(a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment
ࡿഴྥࡀぢࡽࢀࡓࡶࡢࡢ㸪ࡇࢀࡽࡢኚ໬⋡ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ Fig.19 Relations between Stiffening Force and Ratio of Rigidity
␗࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡓࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ u㸪(E̾Dࢆ Pm ࡛㝖ࡋࡓ⤖ᯝ㸪Fig.19 ࡛ nN nN
6 F /P (%) 6 Mi / (d P
㺼 ) (%)
ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ഴྥࡀ␗࡞ࡿ⤖ᯝ࡜࡞ࡗࡓࠋ i=1 i m m
5 N
12 i =1
n nN
Fig.20 ࡟㸪ᱱࡢ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜᫬࡟⿵๛ᮦ࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ(a)Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ㸪 6 F /Pm
i=1 i 6 Mi /( d P㺼
m
)
=0.6N兟Fmax/Pm
10 i =1
=0.6N兟Mmax/(d㺃Pm㻕
(b)⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚࡢྜィ್࡜᭱኱್ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋྛࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣ 4 nN nN
6 F /P 6 Mi / ( d P )
i= 1 i m 8 i =1
㺼
m
ᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ซ౛ࡣ Fig.15 ࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣᮦ㛗᪉ྥ 3 =0.35N兟Fmax/Pm
=0.35N兟Mmax/(d㺃Pm㻕
6
࡟ἢࡗ࡚タࡅࡓࣂࢿせ⣲ࡢ⿵๛ຊẚ F/Pm 㸪M/Mm ࡢྜィ್࡛࠶ࡾ㸪
2
ᶓ㍈ࡣ⿵๛ຊẚࡢ᭱኱್ Fmax/Pm 㸪Mmax/Mm ࡟⿵๛ࣂࢿࡢᩘ N ࢆ஌ࡌ 4
ࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿ(௨㝆㸪⿵๛ຊẚࡢୖ㝈್࡜࿧ࡪ)ࠋ(a)ࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺ࡟♧ 1 2
ࡍỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚࡢྜィ್ࡣୖ㝈್ࡢ 60%⛬ᗘ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪 0
000 1 2 3 4 5 00 2 4 6 8 10 12
ᩥ⊩ 6)࡛ᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢ࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ᱱ࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜ࡢྜ N兟Fmax/Pm (%) N兟Mmax /(d㺃P ) (%)
m
ィࡣ㸪ࣂࢿせ⣲୍ࡘᙜࡓࡾࡢ᭱኱㍈Ⲵ㔜࡟ࣂࢿࡢᩘ N ࢆ஌ࡌ࡚ồࡵ
(a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment
࡚࠸ࡿࡀ㸪ᱱ࡟స⏝ࡍࡿ⿵๛ຊࡣᮦ㛗᪉ྥ࡟୍ᵝ࡛࡞ࡃ㸪᭱኱್࡜ Fig.20 Total and Maximum Values of Stiffening Force
࡞ࡿ఩⨨࠿ࡽᱱ➃࡟ྥ࠿ࡗ࡚ᗙᒅኚᙧࡢῶᑡ࡟క࠸⿵๛ຊࡀపୗࡍ
ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚పୗࡋ㸪 ࡜ࡁࡢ(a)Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚࡢẚ⋡ ( F
max Pm ) ( Fmax,s.s Pm,s.s ) 㸪(b)⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔ
᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢሙྜ 35%⛬ᗘ࡜࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ ࣥࢺẚࡢẚ⋡ (M max d ˜ Pm ) (M max,s.s d ˜ Pm,s.s ) ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ༢
ࡿ࡜㸪ᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᅇ㌿ࡀᣊ᮰ࡉࢀ㸪ᱱ➃㏆ഐࡢỈᖹኚᙧࡀᑠࡉࡃ
⣧ᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓሙྜࡢ⿵
࡞ࡾ㸪ྜィ್ࡀపୗࡋࡓࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ(b)ࡢ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ࡛ࡶྠ
๛ຊẚࡢ㛵ಀ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ W ((17b)ᘧ)࡛࠶ࡿࠋྛࣉ
ᵝ࡟㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜ㸪ྜィ್ࡣୖ㝈್ࡢ 60%⛬ᗘ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡀ㸪
ࣟࢵࢺࡣซ౛࡟♧ࡍ࡜࠾ࡾᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ 0.5 AK0㸪AK0㸪1.5 AK0
᏶඲ᅛᐃ࡛ࡣ 35%⛬ᗘࡲ࡛ྜィ್ࡀపୗࡍࡿࠋᅗ୰㸪㯮ᐇ⥺࡛♧ࡍ
ࡶࡋࡃࡣ 0.5 BK0㸪BK0㸪1.5 BK0 ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ᑐ㇟࡜ࡍࡿᱱ᩿㠃㸪ᶓᗙᒅ⣽
⿵๛ຊẚࡢྜィ್࡜ୖ㝈್ࡢ㛵ಀࢆḟᘧ࡟♧ࡍࠋ
㛗ẚࡣ 3 ❶࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ(a)ࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ㸪(b)ࡢ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ
n

¦ F Pm
i 1
0.6 N ˜Fmax Pm (19) ẚ࡜ࡶ࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜⿵๛ᙧᘧ࡟ࡼࡽࡎ༢⣧ᨭᣢ
n ࡢሙྜ࡜ẚ㍑ࡋ࡚ᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࣉࣟࢵࢺࢆໟ⤡ࡍࡿࡼ࠺࡞ᘧࢆ⡆༢
¦ M d ˜ P 
i 1
m 0.6 N ˜ M max  d ˜ Pm  (20)
࡞ಀᩘࢆ⏝࠸࡚㸪(21)㸪(22)ᘧࡢࡼ࠺࡟ồࡵࡿࠋ୧ᘧࡼࡾᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰
4.3 ᭱኱Ỉᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ࣭⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚࡢホ౯ ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚⿵๛ຊẚࡢẚ⋡ࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪౛
Fig.21 ࡟ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡜㸪༢⣧ᨭᣢࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚࢆᇶ‽࡜ࡋࡓ ࠼ࡤ Type B ࡢሙྜ㸪Fig.19 ࠿ࡽศ࠿ࡿࡼ࠺࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁ

─ 152 ─
ࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜ᱱ➃ࡢᶓ᭤ࡆኚᙧࡀᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡿࡓࡵ࡟㸪᤟ࢀኚᙧ࡜ᅇ㌿⿵ (Fmax/Pm) (F /P ) {Mmax/(d࣭Pm)}/{Mmax,s.s/(d࣭Pm,s.s)}
max,s.s m,s.s
๛๛ᛶࡢ✚࡛࠶ࡿ⿵๛ຊࡢ᭱኱್ࡀῶᑡࡍࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 1.2
Eq.(21)
 Fmax Pm   Fmax,s.s Pm,s.s  0.35W  0.8 (21) 1
(22) 0.8
 M max d ˜ Pm   M max,s.s d ˜ Pm,s.s  0.3W  0.95
0.6 0.5AK0 , 0.5BK0
0.5AK0 , 0.5BK0
Fig.22 ࡟㸪⿵๛ຊ࡜⿵๛๛ᛶẚࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍࠋࣉࣟࢵࢺࡣซ౛࡟ 0.4 AK0 , BK0 AK0 , BK0 Eq.(22)
1.5AK0 , 1.5BK0
♧ࡍᙎረᛶ኱ኚᙧゎᯒ⤖ᯝ㸪ᐇ⥺ࡣᚋ㏙ࡍࡿ⿵๛ຊẚࡢୖ㝈ホ౯ᘧ 0.2 1.5AK0 , 1.5BK0 Ref.6)
Ref.6)
ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ㸪Fig.19 ⦪㍈ࡢ᭱኱᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ᫬ 000 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1W
࡟స⏝ࡍࡿỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚཬࡧ⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚࢆ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ (a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment 
Fig.21 Relations between Ratio of Stiffening Force
ࡼࡿኚ໬⋡((21)㸪(22)ᘧࡢྑ㎶)࡛㝖ࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᶓ㍈ࡣ㸪⿵๛ and Ratio of Warping Restraint
๛ᛶ㸪᤟ࢀ࡟㛵ࡍࡿ㡯ࢆྵࡵࡓ K࡛̓࠶ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣᩥ⊩ 11)(19)ᘧ࡛
࠶ࡾ㸪ᮏㄽᩥ୰࡛ࡣ(23)ᘧ࡜ࡋ࡚෌ᥖࡍࡿࠋ W Warping Fully
Type Fixed 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.75
Fixed
K c ª¬ ku ku 0  ˜  kE kE 0 º¼ F (23)[ᩥ⊩ 11)(19)] A
B
ᩥ⊩ 11)࡛ࡣ㸪༢⣧ᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚ࡜⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ
(Fmax/Pm)/(0.8-0.35W )(%) {Mmax/(d࣭Pm)}/(0.95-0.3W )(%)
ẚࡢ᭱኱್ࡢホ౯ᘧࡀᥦ᱌ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࢆඖ 0.01
࡟ヨ⾜㘒ㄗⓗ࡟ồࡵࡓ⿵๛ຊ࡜⿵๛๛ᛶࡢ㛵ಀᘧ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢ༢⣧ W1 =0.1, W2 =0.25, W3 =0.5, W 4 =0.75
0.008
ᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡢホ౯ᘧ࡟(21)㸪(22)ᘧ࡛ᐃࡵࡓᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ᑐࡍࡿኚ Eq.(25)
໬⋡ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓࡶࡢࡀḟᘧ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ 0.006 Eq.(24)
 Fmax / Pm   0.8  0.35W  
0.0028 0.8  1 Kc  (24)
0.004
^M max /  d ˜ Pm `0.95  0.3W  
0.004 0.8  1 
Kc ࠉ (25)
0.002
Fig.22(a)㸪(b)୰ࡢᐇ⥺࡛♧ࡋࡓ(24)㸪(25)ᘧࡣ࡯ࡰᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡢ
ୖ㝈࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦࡢ⿵๛ຊẚ 0
00 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 K'
ࡢୖ㝈್ࢆホ౯࡛ࡁࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ (a) Lateral Stiffening Force (b) Rotational Stiffening Moment
Fig.22 Evaluation of Upper Bound of Stiffening Force

5. ⤖
ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣ㸪➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡀస⏝ࡋ㸪ᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡾᶓ 4) ༢⣧ᨭᣢࡢ࡜ࡁࡢ⿵๛ຊẚࡢホ౯ᘧ 11)
࡟㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼࡿ
᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆᑟࡁ㸪ᙎረ ⿵๛ຊࡢኚ໬⋡ࢆ⪃៖ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛㸪ᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡾᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ
ᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘ࡜⿵๛ຊࢆホ౯ࡋࡓࠋ௨ୗ࡟ᚓࡽࢀࡓ⤖ㄽࢆ♧ࡍࠋ ᮰ࡉࢀࡓᱱࡢỈᖹ⿵๛ຊẚࡢୖ㝈್ࢆ(24)ᘧ㸪⿵๛࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺẚ
1) ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲ࡟ࡼࡿኚศཎ⌮ࢆࡶ࡜࡟㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ ࡢୖ㝈್ࢆ(25)ᘧ࡛ホ౯࡛ࡁࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
ሙྜ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚➼᭤ࡆ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺࡀస⏝ࡍࡿ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢ
ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ(11)~(13)ᘧࢆㄏᑟࡋࡓࠋᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ H ㅰ㎡
ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡣ㸪ᰕࡢ᤟ࡾ᢬ᢠ࡟ࡼࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ࡟ࡼ ᮏ◊✲ࡣ⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝⿵ຓ㔠ᇶ┙◊✲(B)(ㄢ㢟␒ྕ 19H02280)࡟ࡼ
ࡗ࡚཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢ㛫࡜࡞ࡿࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃ࡜᏶඲ ࡿᡂᯝ࡛࠶ࡾࡲࡍࠋࡇࡇ࡟㸪῝ࡃឤㅰࡢពࢆ⾲ࡋࡲࡍࠋࡲࡓ㸪ᮏ◊
ᅛᐃ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ⏝࠸࡚㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ H ✲࡟㝿ࡋ࡚㸪
ᵝࠎ࡞ࡈຓゝࢆ㡬ࡁࡲࡋࡓᐑክ✚Ặ࡟῝ㅰ࠸ࡓࡋࡲࡍࠋ
ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆ(15)ᘧ࡜ࡋ࡚ㄏᑟࡋࡓࠋࡉࡽ࡟㸪᭷
㝈せ⣲ἲ࡟ࡼࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ࡟ࡼࡾ㸪ୖ㏙ࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜 ཧ⪃ᩥ⊩
1) D. A. Nethercot, K. C. Rockey: A Unified Approach to the Elastic Lateral
ᘧࡢጇᙜᛶࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
Buckling of Beams; The Structural Engineer, Vol.49, No. 7, July, 1971
2) ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡼࡾ⟬ฟࡋࡓಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗ẚࢆタィᣦ㔪 9)
2) Suzuki, T. and Kimura Y.: Lateral Buckling of H-Shaped Beams with Warping
ࡢタィᘧ࡟㐺⏝ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ࡉࢀࡓ㐃⥆⿵๛ H ᙧ㗰 Restraint of Beam-to Column Joints, Journal of Journal of Structural and
Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), No.537, pp. 115-120, 2000. 11
ᱱࡢᙎረᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࢆホ౯࡛ࡁࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ࡞࠾㸪Fig.3
(in Japanese)
࡟♧ࡍᐇ㝿ࡢᰕ࡜ᱱࡢ⤌ࡳྜࢃࡏ࡟࠾࠸࡚㸪཯ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜ࡟ 3) Suzuki, T. and Kimura, Y.: Buckling Length of H-shaped Beams in Steel Rigid
ᑐࡋ࡚᭱ᑠࡢᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ( K  kN mm/rad)࡛ࡣ㸪Type A ࡛ Frame, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ),
Vol. 64, No. 521, pp. 127-132,1999. 7 (in Japanese)
0.01% 㸪 Type B ࡛ 9.66% 㸪 ᭱ ኱ ࡢ ᶓ ᭤ ࡆ ᣊ ᮰ ᗘ ( K  kN
4) Takeya, M. and Idota, H.: Elastic Lateral Buckling Strength of H-Shaped Steel
mm/rad)࡛ࡣ Type A ࡛ 12.7%㸪Type B ࡛ 19.0%㸪ಟṇ୍⯡໬⣽㛗 Beams under Arbitrary Boundary Conditions, Journal of Structural and
ẚࡀపῶࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡋࡓࠋ Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 84, No. 755, pp. 73-83,
2019. 1 (in Japanese)
3) 㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦ඲యࡢ⿵๛ຊࡢྜィ್࡜㸪⿵๛ຊࡢ᭱኱್࡜ࡢ㛵ಀ
5) Ikarashi, K. and Onishi Y. (2014) Elastic Buckling Strength of H-shaped Beams
࡛ࡣ཯ࡾᅛᐃࡢሙྜ㸪ྜィ್ࡣୖ㝈್ࡢ 60%⛬ᗘ࡜࡞ࡿࡀ㸪ᶓ with Continuous Complete Restraint on Upper Flange, Journal of Structural and
᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡟ࡘࢀ࡚పୗࡋ㸪᏶඲ᅛᐃࡢሙྜ 35%⛬ Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 690, pp. 1513-1521,
2014. 12 (in Japanese)
ᗘ࡜࡞ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㸪⿵๛ຊࡢ᭱኱್ࢆᢕᥱࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛඲
6) Kimura, Y., Miya, M., Liao., W.: Effect of Restraint for Continuous Braces on
యࡢྜィ್((19)㸪(20)ᘧ)ࢆᴫࡡ⟬ฟ࡛ࡁࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ Lateral Buckling Load for H-Shaped Beams to Column Joint, Journal of

─ 153 ─
 Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 83, No. 751, Beam Considering Limit State, Journal of Structural and Construction
pp. 1353-1363, 2018. 9 (in Japanese) Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), No. 69, pp. 117-125, 1995. 3 (in Japanese)
7) Kimura, Y., Miya.: Effect of Warping Restraint of Beams to Column Joint on
Lateral Buckling Behavior for H-Shaped Beams with Continuous Braces under AppendixϨ
Gradient Flexural Moment, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering  Appendix Figs.1㸪2 ࡣ㸪ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ⋡࡜ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰
(Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 84, No. 766, pp. 1601-1611, 2019. 12 (in Japanese) ᗘࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋซ౛ࡣ Fig.13 ࡜ྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᩘ್ゎᯒࣔࢹࣝࡣ Fig.2
8) Nakamura, H., Idota, H.: Cyclic Loading Tests of Steel Structure Frames ࡟♧ࡍせ⣲ศ๭㸪ᮦ➃ᨭᣢ᮲௳࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓ㸪Fig.10 ࡢึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ୚࠼࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
Subjected Horizontal Loading, Journal of AIJ Tokai Chapter Architectural Appendix Figs.1㸪2 ࡣ㸪(15)ᘧࢆࡶ࡜࡟సᡂࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ࡜ᙎረᛶ⠊ᅖ
Research Meeting, Vol. 55, pp. 157-160, 2017. 2 (in Japanese) ࡢഴྥࡀྠᵝ࡛࠶ࡿ࠿ࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
୰ᮧග, ஭ᡞ⏣⚽ᶞ: Ỉᖹຊࢆཷࡅࡿ㗰ᵓ㐀࣮࣓ࣛࣥ㦵⤌ࡢ⧞㏉ࡋ㍕Ⲵ Appendix Fig.1 ࡼࡾ㸪⿵๛๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡯࡝㸪ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘࡢ๭ྜ
ᐇ㦂, ᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍ᮾᾏᨭ㒊◊✲ሗ࿌᭩, ➨ 55 ᕳ, pp. 157-160, 2017. 2 ࡣᑠࡉࡃ࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀࢃ࠿ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ㸪ᱱ➃࡟࠾ࡅࡿᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᑠࡉ
9) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ: Design Standard for Steel Structures, 2005 ࡃ࡞ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍: 㗰ᵓ㐀タィつ‽㸪2005 Appendix Fig.2 ࡼࡾ㸪ᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘࡀ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ࡜㸪ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅᛂຊᗘቑຍ
10) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ: Recommendation for Limit State Design of ⋡ࡣ኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪ࡇࢀࡽࡣ⿵๛๛ᛶ࡟ࡼࡽࡎ୍┤⥺࡟ศᕸࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
Steel Structures, 2010 (in Japanese) Appendix Figs.1㸪2 ࡜ Figs.13㸪14 ࢆẚ㍑ࡋࡓ⤖ᯝ㸪ᙎᛶ⠊ᅖ㸪ᙎረᛶ⠊ᅖ࡛
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍: 㗰ᵓ㐀㝈⏺≧ែタィᣦ㔪࣭ྠゎㄝ, 2010 ྠᵝࡢ⤖ᯝࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
11) Kimura, Y., Yoshino, Y. and Ogawa J.: Effect of Lateral-Rotational Restraint and Vcr,W /Vcr,w.s Vcr,W /Vcr,w.s
2
Strength of Continuously Braces on Lateral Buckling Load for H-Shaped Beams,
Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 1.5
77, No. 683, pp. 193-201, 2011. 12 (in Japanese)
10 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
12) Kimura, Y .and Yoshino, Y.: Effect of Lateral-Rotational Restraint of Continuous
Braces on Lateral Buckling Strength for H-Shaped Beams with Flexural Moment (a)Type A (b)Type B
Appendix Fig.1
Gradient, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of
AIJ), Vol. 81, No. 726, pp. 1309-1319, 2016. 8 (in Japanese) (Vcr,W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s) (Vcr,W -Vcr,w.s)/(Vcr,f.s-Vcr,w.s)
13) Kimura, Y., Sugita, Y. and Yoshino, Y. (2016) Effect of Lateral-Rotational 1
Restraint of Continuous Braces on Lateral Buckling Strength for H-Shaped Steel
0.5
Beams with Compressive Axial Force and Flexural Moment, Journal of Structural
and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 81, No. 726, pp. 1321- 00 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1W
1331, 2016. 8 (in Japanese) (a)Type A (b)Type B
14) Kimura, Y .and Sugita, Y.: Effect of Lateral-Rotational Restraint by Continuous Appendix Fig.2
Braces on Lateral Buckling Strength for H-Shaped Beams with Gradient Flexural
Moment and Compressive Axial Force, Journal of Structural and Construction Appendixϩ
Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol.82, No.741, pp.1799-1809,2017.11 (in  ᮏㄽᩥ࡛ࡣᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࢆ㐃⥆⿵๛ᮦ࡜᝿ᐃࡋ࡚㸪ᩘ್ゎᯒ࡛⿵๛㛫㝸ࢆ
Japanese) l’=250mm ࡜ࡋ࡚ᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࡢጇᙜᛶࢆ᳨ドࡋࡓࡀ㸪ࡼࡾ⿵๛㛫㝸ࡢᗈ
15) Tsuda, K .and Kido, M.: Buckling Strength of Columns Braced Continuously with ࠸ᢡᯈࡸ㞳ᩓⓗ࡟ྲྀࡾࡘࡃẕᒇᮦࡢࡼ࠺࡞ሙྜ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡶᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ
Varying Axial Force:-Flexural buckling of compressive flange of H-shaped steel ࡀ㐺⏝࡛ࡁࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ᳨ドࡍࡿࠋAppendix Fig.3 ࡟ྛ⿵๛㛫㝸࡛ࡢᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎ
restrained by web or slab-, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering ᯒ⤖ᯝࡢపୗ⋡ࢆ♧ࡍࠋ⦪㍈ࡣ l’=100mm ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡟ᑐࡍ
(Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 690, pp. 1513-1521, 2013. 8 (in Japanese) ࡿ㸪௵ពࡢ⿵๛㛫㝸࡟࠾ࡅࡿᙎᛶᅛ᭷್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࡢ๭ྜ࡜ࡋ㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣᮦ㛗 l ࡟
16) Matsui, R., Yamaura, Y. and Takeuchi T.: Lateral Bracing Requirements for H- ᑐࡍࡿ⿵๛㛫㝸 l’ࡢ๭ྜ l’/l ࡜ࡍࡿࠋࣃ࣓࣮ࣛࢱࡣᶓ᭤ࡆᣊ᮰ᗘ W =0㸪0.5㸪1
Section Beams with Supports Attached to Top Flange Subjected to Cyclic ࡛㸪Type A㸪Type B ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ⣽ᖜ H ᙧ᩿㠃 H-500×200×9×16(b/h=0.5)㸪
Antisymmetric Moment, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering ᶓᗙᒅ⣽㛗ẚO1=200(l=13000mm)㸪ᇶ‽ᚲせ⿵๛๛ᛶẚ AK0 ࡶࡋࡃࡣ BK0 ࡛࠶
(Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 690, pp. 1485-1492, 2013. 8 (in Japanese) ࡿࠋ⿵๛㛫㝸ࡢ๭ྜࡀ l’/l=0.05(l’=650mm)⛬ᗘࡲ࡛ࡣ㸪పୗ⋡ࡣ 0.26%~4.1%⛬
17) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ (2013) Stability Problems of Steel Structures ᗘ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࡀ㸪 l’/lӍ0.077 ࡛ 10%⛬ᗘ࡟పୗࡍࡿࠋᐇ㝿ࡢᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡢ⿵
2013. 2013. 6 (in Japanese) ๛㛫㝸ࡣ 200~500mm ࡛࠶ࡾ 20)㸪⿵๛㛫㝸࡟ࡼࡽࡎᮏㄽᩥࡢᙎᛶᶓᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍: 㗰ᵓ㐀≀ࡢᗙᒅ࡟㛵ࡍࡿㅖၥ㢟 2013, 2013.6 ࢆ㐺⏝࡛ࡁࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ♧ࡉࢀࡓࠋ
18) Yuki, Y. and Kimura Y.: The Tests on Lateral Buckling of H-shaped Steel Beams
with Folded-Roof Plates under Cyclic Load, Proceedings of Constructional Steel. ᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ (l 㻓=100mm)
Vol.24, pp.118-121, 2016.11 (in Japanese) 1.2
ྜྷ㔝⿱㈗, ᮌᮧ⚈⿱: ⧞㏉ࡋ㍕Ⲵࢆཷࡅᒇ᰿ᢡᯈࡘࡁ H ᙧ㗰ᱱࡢᶓᗙᒅ 1
㍕Ⲵᐇ㦂, 㗰ᵓ㐀ᖺḟㄽᩥሗ࿌㞟, ➨ 24 ᕳ, pp. 810-813, 2016. 11
0.8
19) ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual version6.14䠈2014. 4 H-500™250™9™16 (b/h=0.5)
20) Japan Steel Corporation: Material handbook for buildings, 2019 (in Japanese) 0.6 O1=200 (l=13000mm) K0
᪥ᮏ〇㕲ᰴᘧ఍♫: ᘓ⠏⏝㈨ᮦࣁࣥࢻࣈࢵࢡ, 2019 0.4 W =0 W =0.5 W =1
21) Idota, H., Kato, Y. and Ono, T.: Lateral Bracing Spacing and Strength of H- 0.2
Type A

Shaped Steel Beams under Cyclic Loading, Journal of Structural and Construction Type B
0 l'/l
Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), Vol. 78, No. 693, pp. 1989-1998, 2013. 11 (in 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
l 㻓(mm)
Japanese) 100 500 1000
22) Architectural Institute of Japan, AIJ: Japanese Architectural Standard Appendix Fig.3 ⿵๛㛫㝸ࡢ᳨ウ
Specification 6, 2018
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍: ᘓ⠏ᕤ஦ᶆ‽௙ᵝ᭩ JASS6 㕲㦵ᕤ஦, 2018
23) Suzuki, T.: Lateral Bracing Forces on Beams and Columns, Journal of Structural
and Construction Engineering, Transactions of the Architectural Institute of Japan,
No. 41, p. 295, 1966. 10 (in Japanese)
㕥ᮌᩄ㑻: ᗙᒅᨭⅬࡢᶓ⿵๛ຊ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚, ᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍ㄽᩥሗ࿌㞟, ྕእ,
p. 295, 1966. 10
24) Ono, T., Ishida, T. and Shimono, K.: A Study on Bracing for Steel Column and

─ 154 ─
 EFFECT OF WARPING RESTRAINT OF BEAMS TO COLUMN JOINT
EFFECT ON LATERAL FOR
OF RESTRAINT BUCKLING BEHAVIOR
CONTINUOUS FOR
BRACES ONH-SHAPED BEAMS LOAD
LATERAL BUCKLING
WITH
FOR CONTINUOUS
H-SHAPED BRACES
BEAMS WITH UNDER
WARPING GRADIENT
RESTRAINT FLEXURAL
OF BEAMS MOMENT
TO COLUMN JOINT

Yoshihiro KIMURA and Yui SATO

Yoshihiro KIMURA＊1*1 and Yui SATO*2＊2

＊1
 Prof.,
*1 Professor Graduate
㸪Graduate School,
School Tohoku 㸪
of Engineering University, Dr.Eng.㸪Dr.Eng.
Tohoku University
＊2
 Grad. Student, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University
*2 Graduate Student㸪Graduate School of Engineering㸪Tohoku University㸪B.Eng.

In design standard for steel structures (AIJ 2005), the boundary condition of beams under lateral buckling load is provided as simple
support. Meanwhile, beams are often jointed to box-shaped columns with high torsional rigidity as shown in Figure 1. Therefore, beam
ends have fork restraint by high torsional rigidity of column on lateral buckling, which is considered the rotational effect between warping
and fully fixed supports.
On the other hand, long span main beams may not possess the full plastic strength due to lateral buckling, so that many lateral braces
should be set up along the beams to prevent the lateral buckling deformation (AIJ 2010). When non-structural members such as folded roof
plate are directly jointed to beams, they may be used as the continuous braces. However, in Japanese design code, the non-structural
members are not considered as braces. Kimura, Yoshino, and Ogawa (2013) clarified the lateral buckling behavior for H-shaped beam with
continuous braces when the boundary condition of the beams is simple support.
This paper evaluates the effect of fork restraint on elastic lateral buckling load for H-shaped beams with continuous braces under the
uniform flexural moment and Saint-Venant torsional rigidities in energy conservation equations. In this study, two types of loading
conditions are considered, where the upper flange’s compressive load is larger than the lower flange’s one (loading condition, Type A), and
where the upper flange’s compressive load is smaller than the lower flange’s one (loading condition, Type B). The continuous braces rigidity
is divided into the lateral rigidity, ku, and rotational rigidity, kE, as shown in Fig.1. In the case of Type A, lateral rigidity is effective for
preventing lateral deformation of compressive upper flange, whereas in the case of Type B, rotational rigidity is effective for preventing
torsional deformation. Considering fork restraint by column, elastic lateral buckling load of beams with continuous braces are expressed as
the loads between warping and fully fixed support.
This study is conducted by the following procedures:
࣭ The elastic lateral buckling load with warping and fully fixed support under flexural moment is developed by energy method, and
can be calculated with Eqs. (11)~(13). Considering fork restraint by column, elastic lateral buckling load of beams with continuous
braces are expressed as the loads between warping and fully fixed support. The results are verified by eigenvalue analyses.
࣭ The elasto-plastic lateral buckling behaviors of the beams are simulated by elasto-plastic large deformation analysis. The lower bound
of the elasto-plastic lateral buckling stress of the beams are evaluated according to the buckling curve of bending member provided
by Recommendation for Limit State Design of Steel Structure (AIJ), using proposing modified equivalent slenderness ratio.
࣭ The relationship between the total value of the stiffing force of the whole continuous braces and the maximum value was grasped. In
the case of warping fixed support, the total value is about 60% of the upper bound value. Next, it decreases as the fork rigidity
increases, and is about 35% in the case of fully fixed support.
࣭ The upper bound of rotational stiffening moment and lateral stiffening force of continuous braces is evaluated by Eqs. (24) and (25)
based on the ratio of flexural and torsional rigidities of beams when the lateral buckling of beams with fork restraint by column occur.
.
（2020 年 5 月 10 日原稿受理，2020 年 10 月 1 日採用決定）

─ 155 ─