This document provides the grading criteria and rubric for a midterm assignment on the topic of medievalism in film for a course on the Middle Ages. The rubric assesses student papers on main argument, addressing assignment questions, use of evidence, organization, length, grammar/spelling, and proper use of APA citation style. Papers are evaluated on a scale from Distinguished to Needs Work in each criteria area and an overall total score out of 30 points is provided.
This document provides the grading criteria and rubric for a midterm assignment on the topic of medievalism in film for a course on the Middle Ages. The rubric assesses student papers on main argument, addressing assignment questions, use of evidence, organization, length, grammar/spelling, and proper use of APA citation style. Papers are evaluated on a scale from Distinguished to Needs Work in each criteria area and an overall total score out of 30 points is provided.
This document provides the grading criteria and rubric for a midterm assignment on the topic of medievalism in film for a course on the Middle Ages. The rubric assesses student papers on main argument, addressing assignment questions, use of evidence, organization, length, grammar/spelling, and proper use of APA citation style. Papers are evaluated on a scale from Distinguished to Needs Work in each criteria area and an overall total score out of 30 points is provided.
Course: LIBS1870-23S-Sec4-The Middle Ages and the Modern W
Criteria Distinguished Good Acceptable Developing Needs Work Criterion Score
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point /5
Main argument The paper lays out The paper lays out The paper lays out Paper makes an Paper does not a strong and a clear main an acceptable effort to lay out a appear to have a persuasive main argument about main argument main argument main argument. argument about the medievalism of about the about the the medievalism of the film under medievalism of the medievalism of the the film under discussion. film under film under discussion. discussion, but discussion, but it would have is not expressed benefited from clearly. being more clear and/or specific.
6 points 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points /6
Assignment questions Paper Paper Paper Paper Paper does not incorporates incorporates incorporates incorporates incorporate discussion of all discussion of all discussion of most discussion of some discussion of most assignment assignment assignment assignment of the assignment questions questions clearly. questions, but the questions, but the questions. thoughtfully and analysis is not analysis is largely thoroughly. always clear or unclear or fully developed. underdeveloped. Criteria Distinguished Good Acceptable Developing Needs Work Criterion Score
6 points 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points /6
Evidence Supports analysis Supports analysis Supports analysis Supports analysis Does not support with excellent with with with few pieces of analysis with evidence from the appropriate eviden adequate evidence evidence from the evidence from the film. Evidence is ce from the film. from the film. film, and/or has film. well-discussed and Student has made Student has made made no effort to explicitly linked to a good effort to an effort to discuss evidence, the paper's discuss evidence, discuss evidence, leaving it to speak analysis. but more was but much more for itself. needed. was required.
3 points 2.5 points 2 points 1 point 0 points /3
Organization Shows highly Shows logical Shows some Shows little Shows no effective organization of organization of organization of organization of organization of ideas. ideas. ideas. ideas. ideas.
3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points 0 points /3
Length Meets length More than 20% More than 40% More than 50% requirements. too long or too too short. too short. short. Criteria Distinguished Good Acceptable Developing Needs Work Criterion Score
4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point 0.5 points /4
Grammar and Spelling Clear and easy to Clear, with some Requires Difficult to read Very difficult to read, with no minor spelling or concentration to owing to read owing to spelling or grammatical read owing to noticeable major technical grammatical errors, or minor spelling and technical and and stylistic errors. problems with grammatical errors stylistic problems problems. Clarity word choice or and/or poor word that seriously of the paper is rough phrasing. choice or rough impede the clarity almost completely Student would phrasing which of the paper. obscured. benefit from sometimes Student would Connecting with additional time obscure the clarity benefit greatly the writing tutors editing/proofreadi of the paper. from an at the Library is ng their work. Student would appointment with strongly advised benefit from the writing tutors prior to the next additional time at the Library. assignment. editing/proofreadi ng their work, and an appointment with the writing tutors at the Library may also be beneficial.
3 points 2.5 points 2 points 1 point 0 points /3
APA No errors. Few, minor errors. Many minor Major errors Sources not in errors. and/or some un- APA and/or a cited material. general lack of in- text citations.
Total / 30 Overall Score
Distinguished Good Acceptable Developing Needs Work
Grammar Practice Simplified: Guided Practice in Basic Skills (Book B, Grades 3-4): Sentences, Verbs, Nouns, Pronouns, Capitalization, Subjects, Predicates, and More