Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Petition To Annul Contract of Lease
Petition To Annul Contract of Lease
(GUIMBAL-IGBARAS-TUBUNGAN-TIGBAUAN)
Guimbal, Iloilo
HEIRS OF HILARIO
BECERA namely:
ADELAIDA B. TASIO,
JOSEPH G. BECERA JR.,
LUCIA NONO, HERLY B.
BLANCO, MACARIA L.
BECERA, AILEEN B.
GAYORGOR AND MARIA
L. BECERA,
Plaintiffs,
PETITION
7.That Plaintiffs are the surviving and legal heirs of Hilario Becera
who is the declared owner of Lot No. 4702 with an area of 9,189 square
meters with an assessed value of Twenty-Seven Thousand Two Hundred
Forty Pesos (P27,240.00) located at Barangay Nalundan, Guimbal, Iloilo
under Tax Declaration No. 19-0020-00183 with PIN No. 041-19-0020-006-
02. Attached herewith is the Tax Declaration No. 19-0020-00183 as Annex
“J”;
9. Years passed, defendant Dio Rose Becera did not update her aunts
and cousins as to the status of the person she knew who was interested in
leasing their property;
10. That it was only in September 2022 that Plaintiffs found out that
someone was using their land when one of their nephew, ___________,
went to the subject property and a sign was placed stating, “No Trespassing,
No Entry.”;
11. That thereafter, they confronted defendant Dio Rose Becera and it
was only last September 6, 2022 that Defendant Becera gave the copy of the
Contract of Lease dated February 1, 2018 executed by Dio Rose P. Becera
and Leonisa H. Hilisan. Moreover, defendant Becera told plaintiffs that she
has an authority signed by them. Hereto attached is the copy of the Contract
of Lease as Annex “K” and the letter of authority as Annex “L”;
12. That plaintiffs did not sign any document giving the authority to
defendant Dio Rose Becera to enter into a Contract of Lease to Defendant
Leonisa H. Hilisan nor to anyone;
13. That strict scrutiny of the document alleging that plaintiffs gave
their authority to Defendant Becera shows that it is a forgery and
unenforceable as signatures of the plaintiffs are very different as to their
signatures in their valid identification cards. Attached are the copies of their
valid government identification cards as Annexes “M” to “S”, respectively;
2
14. That defendant Dio Rose Hilisan has been receiving the rent from
Defendant Leonisa Hilisan for almost 5 years already without giving any
share to the plaintiffs;
15. That to attempt to settle the case amicably, plaintiffs required the
presence of Defendant Dio Rose Becera before the Office of the Lupong
Tagapamayapa but to no avail. Hereto attached is the Certificate to File
Action as Annex “T”;
PRAYER
Plaintiffs further pray for such other reliefs and remedies deemed just
and proper under the premises.
3
Respectfully submitted, 31 August 2022, Guimbal, Iloilo, Philippines.
By: