Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effects of Scientific Calculator Usage On Pre-Service Teacher's Computational Skills
The Effects of Scientific Calculator Usage On Pre-Service Teacher's Computational Skills
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- This study was meant to measure the effects of be restructured and this has seriously affected pre-service
the use of scientific calculators on pre-service teachers’ teachers learning of many subjects, especially mathematics
computational skills. It specifically sought to find out the (Lacek, 2023). This brought to bear the position statement by
impact of scientific calculator usage on pre-service Dhondt, Kraan, & Bal, (2022). that
teachers’ performance and errors in computational skills.
Thirty student-teachers participated in the study. The nature of mathematics training has altered over the
Researchers used interviews, pre-tests, interventions, and past several years as a result of greater technological use and
post-tests to investigate the impact of scientific calculator shifting employment requirements. Pre-service teachers must
use on student-teachers’ computational skills. The study be prepared to thrive in the technologically advanced culture
revealed the errors student-teachers made in their of today. This calls for highly trained professionals with the
computational skills which included errors in parenthesis, aptitude to use their mathematics knowledge, which goes
approximation, concept application and sequence of above and beyond the basic aptitude for addressing everyday
operations. As a result, we found that there was a issues. (Dhondt, Kraan, & Bal, 2022; Lacek, 2023).
difference between the results before and after the test in
terms of the minimum, maximum, mean, and standard Unquestionably, it has been crucial to change how
deviation and the latter was superior to the former (i.e., important computing, thinking, and problem-solving are in
the pre-test mean and the standard deviation is 3.90, test schools and institutions. Understanding mathematics and the
after 2.05). The test means and SD are 6.40 and 2.67). The use of technology in mathematics instruction and learning
t-test results (29df, t=6.335, p=0.00) also showed that the have also been stressed. Pre-service teachers who understand
mean difference was significant at p=0.00. Analysis was mathematics and use technology remember what they learn
performed to determine whether mean differences were and can use it in many contexts. Thus, a curriculum that can
statistically significant. This means that scientific enhance the mathematical skills of pre-service teachers is
calculators had improved the computational skills and required in tandem with the expanding effect of technological
abilities of student-teachers, thereby improving their innovation. This includes moving away from a curriculum that
mathematics performance. emphasizes the memorization of obscure facts and procedures
in favor of one that places a stronger emphasis on conceptual
Keywords:- Effects, Scientific Calculator, Usage, Pre-Service understanding, computational skills, problem-solving, and the
Teachers, Computational Skills. use of technology in both teaching and learning (Oppong-
Gyebi, Amoako Atta, Kwadwo, Belbase, Bonyah, & Peprah-
I. INTRODUCTION Opoku, 2023).
Throughout the history of mathematics, aids for According to Matthiessen (2023), it is conceivable to
computations and problem-solving have been developed place less emphasis on algorithmic abilities as a result of the
alongside the study and development of mathematics as a influence of technology forces on mathematics teaching and
subject (Alam, 2022). Mathematical tables, counting boards, learning. This vacuum may then be filled by placing more
logarithm tables and slide rules have all proven useful focus on the development of mathematical ideas. Additionally,
computational aids to mathematics. Thirty years ago, it was technology helps pre-service teachers save time and offers
supposed that mathematics was only needed by somebody them access to innovative, potent new ways to dig deeper into
planning to work in the “hard sciences”, especially physics ideas that were previously unattainable. (David, Pinho,
and chemistry or to become an engineer, a professional Agostinho, Costa, Portella, Keesman, & Garcia, 2022;
statistician or an accountant (Nishida, Ida, & Uchida, 2022). Matthiessen, 2023) The power of technology causes major
Today, numbers and shapes are used all over the world to changes in mathematics education.
calculate, represent, and explain things in arithmetic, geometry
and algebra (Nishida, Ida, & Uchida, 2022). Quite recently,
modern technology has caused many educational curricula to
From the above arguments, it must be pointed out that Study population, Sampling and sampling technique
the essence of calculator technology in mathematics education The targeted population for the research was all
was to solve mathematical problems. The scientific calculator preservice teachers in the Akuapem-North Municipality of the
has been developed to solve problems associated with human Eastern Region of Ghana. The responsibility of instructing the
needs in more productive ways using computational skills. seven mathematics classes was given to math tutors. Non-
However pre-service teachers’ inability to use the scientific probability sampling, in particular convenience and purposeful
calculator in solving mathematical problems was a result of sampling, was employed in this investigation. Due to poor
pre-service teachers’ inability to use their computational skills logistics, limited resources, and accessibility, convenience and
as my observation revealed that most of the pre-service purposeful sampling were used. Based on their availability and
teachers lacked the computational skills majority of them proximity to the researcher, one class was chosen. This kind of
found it difficult to use the scientific calculator in performing research typically uses non-random, small,
complex computations and solving problems in the classroom. convenient/purposeful sample (Clemmons, 2019). According
This observation made me conduct a pre-test to find out how to Etikan, Musa, and Alkassim (2016), a convenience sample
many pre-service teachers had the scientific calculator and is one in which a group of participants were chosen based on
whether they possessed the needed computational skills to use their availability. The researcher believes that the class that
the scientific calculators in solving mathematical problems. was selected was the best option for this study because it
allowed the researcher to track students' development as they
A diagnostic test conducted to find out pre-service were being taught. As a result, the study's sample size was
teachers’ strengths and weaknesses in the use of the scientific thirty (30) pre-service teachers, thirteen (13) of whom were
calculator indicated that only a small percentage made good men and seventeen (17) of whom were women. For the
use of the scientific calculator. Of the few who had it and observations, interviews, pre-test, and post-test, they were
made good use of it in their way, it reflects positively on their assigned pseudonyms. The Casio fx-991MS scientific
results. Thus, the use of the scientific calculator can easily calculator, which made advantage of the existing technology,
enhance pre-service teachers’ ability to solve problems which was utilized. This was selected since all pre-service instructors
will significantly enhance pre-service teachers’ performance owned one and it has the necessary functionalities for the
in mathematics. Some of the pre-service teachers who were research.
interviewed were of the view that they used the calculator
because it is user-friendly. Its usage saves time and reduces Research Instruments
mental strain while others said that they had difficulties in The pre-test, post-test, interview, and observation were
operating the calculators since they had not been taught the the instruments employed for data collection according to the
functions of the various keys on the calculator making it nature of the study. In order to conduct the study, a semi-
difficult for them to use and hence affecting their structured interview guide and a checklist for identifying
performances in their examinations. There was, therefore, the computational mistakes were created. The benefit of a semi-
need to find out the effect of scientific calculator usage on pre- structured interview is that the interviewer has control over
service teachers’ computational skills. how much information is gathered from the interviewee while
also being allowed to explore any new avenues that present
III. METHODOLOGY itself (Khan, 2023). The researcher encouraged the
participants to express themselves freely throughout the
A mixed-methods study design was employed by the interview sessions.
researcher. According to Almalki (2016), mixed methods
research is a type of study in which a researcher or team of Item 1 in the interview guide had to do with how long
researchers combines aspects of qualitative and quantitative students have been using the scientific calculator. Item 2 also
research approaches (e.g., the use of qualitative and had to do with pre-service teachers’ rate of competence with
quantitative viewpoints, data collection, analysis, and the use of the scientific calculator. Item 3 was meant to find
inference techniques) for the general goal of gaining a broad out the factors responsible for pre-service teachers’ (low,
and deep understanding as well as corroboration. To get a average, above average, or high) performance in the use of the
more complete view of the phenomenon, it is thought scientific calculator in studying mathematics. Item 4 in the
desirable to use a mixed-method design. In order to interview guide was meant to find out how the use of the
understand and characterize the situation, the research scientific calculator could improve pre-service teachers’
Table 1: Number of pre-service teachers who used the wrong computational skills for each item in the Pre-test and Post-test
Operational Sequence
Concept Application
Approximation
Parenthesis
Total
N %
Test Items
N % N % N % N % Total Total
Pre-test Item 1 15 50 8 27 5 17 2 7 30 26
Post-test Item 1 1 3 0 0 2 7 0 0 3 3
Pre-test Item 2 8 27 4 13 7 23 0 0 19 17
Post-test Item 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pre-test Item 3 7 23 0 0 8 27 1 3 16 14
Post-test Item 3 2 7 1 3 2 7 0 0 5 4
Pre-test Item 4 2 7 0 0 4 13 3 10 9 8
Post-test Item 4 2 7 0 0 3 10 2 7 7 6
Pre-test Item 5 12 40 0 0 4 13 0 0 16 14
Post-test Item 5 2 7 1 3 5 17 0 0 8 7
Total 53 46 14 12 40 35 8 7 115 100
From Table 1, pre-service teachers’ most common errors From Table 2, further analysis indicates that pre-service
committed were on parenthesis and Operational sequence. teachers’ total errors in both the pre-test and post-test were
Only a few errors were committed in approximation and 115. Out of this number of errors, pre-service teachers
concept application by the pre-service teachers. The majority committed more errors in the pre-test than in the post-test. In
of the pre-service teachers had difficulty in the pre-test but did the pre-test, the total errors were ninety (90) with parenthesis
better in the post-test. and operational sequence having the highest number whilst
approximation and concept application were at the minimum.
Table 2. Number of pre-service teachers who used the Table 2 again indicates in the pre-test that pre-service
wrong computational skills for each item in the Pre-test teachers’ most common errors were on items 1, 2, 3 and 5
and Post-test with errors on item 4 being at the minimum.
Pre-test Post-test
Test Items N % N % In the post-test, the total errors were twenty-five (25)
Item 1 30 33 3 12 with parenthesis and operational sequence having the highest
Item 2 19 21 2 8 number whilst approximation and concept application were
Item 3 16 18 5 20 again at the minimum. Table 2 again indicates in the post-test
Item 4 9 10 7 28 that students’ most common errors were on items 3, 4 and 5.
Item 5 16 18 8 32 From the errors made in the pre-test and post-test in Table 2,
Total 90 100 25 100 pre-service teachers’ difficulties were reduced immensely
after they were taken through the intervention. Pre-service
teachers however attributed the number of errors to their poor
To determine if the mean differences were statistically introduced to its use when they were in JHS 3. The majority of
significant, further analysis was done. The results of the t-test the pre-service teachers rated their competence with the use of
showed that the difference in means was significant at p=0.00 the scientific calculator in solving mathematical problems as a
(29df, t = 6.335). As a result, the alternative hypothesis is very low rate while few of them admitted their performances
accepted and the null hypothesis—that there is no discernible as average.
difference between pre-service teachers' pre-test and post-
test—is rejected. Additionally, it may be claimed that there Pre-service teachers attributed the factors responsible for
was a statistically significant difference between the post-test their poor performance in the use of the scientific calculator to
and pre-test because the student's post-test result (M = 6.40, the fact that the pre-service teachers were either not taught or
SD = 2.673.) was greater than their pre-test result (M = 3.90, were just introduced to the use of the scientific calculator as
SD = 2.057). It can therefore be claimed that the post-test and such their performance.
pre-test showed a statistically significant difference.
As to whether the scientific calculator could improve
According to the study of the data in Table 4, the general pre-service teachers’ computational skills, the number of pre-
performance of pre-service instructors was higher in the post- service teachers who responded that the scientific calculator
test than it was in the pre-test. could improve their computational skills was far greater than
the number of students who responded that the scientific
Table 4: Overall pre-service teachers’ performance in the pre- calculator could not improve their computational skills and
tests and post-test those who gave no response to the question. However, most of
Marks Pre-test results Post-test results the pre-service teachers testified that the most beneficial and
N % N % appropriate tool for studying mathematics in the classroom
and for writing examinations was the scientific calculator. In
0-5 25 83 10 33 addition to that, the pre-service teachers also stated that their
6 - 15 5 17 20 67 computational skills could improve drastically when they are
taught how to use scientific calculators in solving
Pre-service teachers performed poorly on the pre-test, mathematical problems.
with the majority scoring below a 5. The post-test results also
showed that pre-service teachers performed admirably because For instance, Pre-service teacher P said “I think if
the majority of them scored higher than 6. In comparison, pre- mathematics tools such as the scientific calculator are used
service instructors performed much better on the post-test than effectively and efficiently it will develop our computational
did students on the pre-test. skills and help us to solve more mathematical problems.
C. Discussion on the Impact of pre-service teachers’ Pre-service teacher Q was also of the view that
Performance in the Pre-test and Post-test “computational skills help us in using the calculator to check
To find out why pre-service teachers committed so many the correct answer which reduces the computational time”.
computational errors in the pre-test, an interview was
conducted with some of the students. The interview responses Pre-service teacher R also explained that “if our teachers
from the interview revealed that most of the pre-service will make some time and teach us how the scientific
teachers first used the scientific calculator when they were in calculators can be used to the maximum, then we can use it in
SHS 1 while a small percentage explained that they were