Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philippine Criminal Justice System
Philippine Criminal Justice System
Philippine Criminal Justice System
America France
• Has only three pillars • Judge and jurors vote on
• Has a jury system a verdict
Japan
• Cases are heard by
three judges
OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM
Primary Goals:
1. To conduct surveys to gather data
about international and
comparative crime
2. To provide peacekeeping efforts
3. To promote crime prevention
4. To promote a common standard
of justice and fair treatment of
defendants
* UN has no legitimate authority over countries
not member to it -193 member
OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM
INTERPOL
- Formed in 1923
- Operated across national boarders
in cases of terrorism and drug
trafficking
- Depends on the cooperative effort
of participating nations
- 195 member
OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM
• Politia/Politeia: means
government, citizenship, or
activity of the city
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
• Crime Prevention
• Crime Repression
• Criminal Apprehension
National headquarters
1PNP Chief
2 Deputy Chief (admin&oper)
14 admin support unit & 15 operational
support units
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
National bureau of investigation
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
National bureau of investigation
Nov. 13, 1936
establishment
Commonwealth
Act No. 181 created
Division of
Investigation 45 men selected
among300 applicants
June 19, 1947
Criminal Investigation
• Is the art of collecting and analyzing facts about
persons, things, place and subject of a crime to
identify the perpetrator, to locate his
whereabouts, and to gather evidence for the
establishment of his guilt in a criminal
proceeding.
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
Criminal Apprehension or Arrest
c. Arrest of an escape
d. Arrest by bondsman
(surety)
Methods of Arrest
With a Without
Arrest by
warrant by warrant by
Private Person
Police Officer Police Officer
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
Officer may summon assistance
SEARCH WARRANT
- An order in writing issued in the name of
the People of the Philippines, signed by a
judge and directed to a peace officer,
commanding him to search for personal
property described therein and bring it
before the court.
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SEARCH WARRANT
Elements:
1. Written Order
2. Signed by the judge
3. Commanding a peace officer to search
personal property
4. To seize and bring such personal property
to the court
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SEARCH WARRANT
Where to file?
SEARCH WARRANT
Right to break door or window:
When refused admittance after
giving notice for purpose and
authority.
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SEARCH WARRANT
Two witness Rule:
No searches shall be made except
for the presence of two witnesses of
legal age in the absence of the
occupants/owner.
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SEARCH WARRANT
Time of making search:
In the day time unless specified.
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SEARCH WARRANT
Life span:
10 days from date.
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SEARCH WARRANT
Delivery of property and inventory thereof to court:
1. The officer seizing must deliver the property to
court issuing.
2. Ten days after the issuance, the judge issuing the
warrant shall ascertain that the return has been
made.
3. The return of the search warrant shall be filed and
recorded.
THE FIRST PILLAR - POLICE
SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SEARCH WARRANT
Valid warrantless searches and seizure:
a. Incidental to lawful arrest
b. Searches in ‘’Plain View’’
c. Searches of moving vehicles
d. Consented searches
e. Customs searches
f. Stop and frisk situation
g. Searches during emergencies
THE SECOND PILLAR - PROSECUTION
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOJ)
E.O. 292
Administrative MANDATE
Code of 1987 RULE OF LAW Org.
Prescribed the ADMINISTRATION OF
Mandate and JUSTICE
Structure
powers and
functions & org.
Head
SEC. OF JUSTICE
structure of DOJ
Assisted by
3 UNDERSEC.
5 ASS. SEC.
THE SECOND PILLAR - PROSECUTION
NATIONAL PROSECUTION SERVICE (NPS)
Complaint
- is a sworn written statement charging a person
with an offense subscribed by the offended
party, any peace officer, or other public officer
charged with the enforcement of the law
violated.
THE SECOND PILLAR - PROSECUTION
INSTITUTION OF CRIMINAL ACTION
Information
- Is an accusation in writing charging a person
with an offense, subscribed by the prosecutor
and filed with the court.
THE SECOND PILLAR - PROSECUTION
INSTITUTION OF CRIMINAL ACTION
When PI is required?
Offense where the law prescribes a penalty of at least
four years, two months, and one day.
XPN:
arrest w/o warrant – INQUEST PROCEEDING
THE SECOND PILLAR - PROSECUTION
PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
INQUEST PROCEEDING
Summary investigation instead of PI.
Hearing (optional)
Note :
• No complaint or information may be filed or dismissed
by an investigating prosecutor w/o prior written
authority from provincial/city pros. or chief state pros
or the Ombudsman.
• Resolution of the City/Provincial Pros can be modified
by the Sec of Justice motupropio.
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Cayetano Arellano
-as the first chief
June 11, 1901
justice together - Supreme Court was
with associate created along with
justices –majority Courts of First
of whom are Instance, and Justice
of the Peace Courts
American
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
SUPREME COURT
AT PRESENT
- Composed of 1 CHIEF JUSTICE and 14 ASSOCIATE
JUSTICES
- May sit EN BANC or in division of THREE, FIVE and
SEVEN members
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
COURT
a. Supreme Court
b. Court of Appeals
c. Court of Tax Appeals
d. Sandiganbayan
e. Regional Trial Court
f. Municipal and City Courts
g. Shari’a Court
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Ex.
Reckless imprudence resulting to damage of property.
Rape with homicide
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
Bail
- Security given for the release of a person in custody of
the law, furnished by him or a bondsman, to guarantee
his appearance before any court as required under the
conditions hereinafter specified.
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
BAIL
HOW IT IS MADE
e. Private offended party is required to appear for purposes of
plea bargaining and determination of civil liability. In case of
absence with due notice, the accused may enter to a plea of
guilty in lesser offense.
f. It shall be held within 30 days from the date when the court
acquires jurisdiction over the person of the accused
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA
Suspension of arraignment
a. Accused appears to be suffering from an unsound mental
condition.
b. There exist a prejudicial question.
c. Petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is
pending.
Motion to quash
Grounds:
e. When more than one offense is charged
f. That the criminal liability has been extinguished
g. That the accused has been previously convicted or acquitted
of the offense or the case is dismissed.
Purposes
a. Plea bargaining
b. Stipulation of facts
c. Marking for identification of evidence of the parties
d. Waiver of objections to admissibility of evidence
e. Modification of the order trial if accuse admits the charges
but interpose lawful defense
f. Matters that will promote expeditious trial
Non-appearance thereto
- If counsel of the accused or prosecutor does not appear, and
does not offer acceptable excuse, court may impose penalties.
Significance
a. Bind parties and limit the trial to matters disposed
b. Control the course of the proceedings
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
TRIAL
a. The court , motu propio, after giving the prosecution the opportunity
to be heard.
- The adjudication by the court that the accused is guilty or not guilty
of the offense charged and the imposition on him of the proper
penalty and civil liability.
- It must be written in the official language prepared by the judge
and signed by him.
- Shall contain clearly and distinctly a statement of the facts and the
law upon which it is based.
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
JUDGMENT
a. If convicted:
1. Legal qualification of the offense and the aggravating/mitigating
circumstances which attended its commission;
2. The participation of the accused in the offense (principal, accomplice,
accessory);
3. Penalty imposed upon the accused;
4. Civil liability or damages to be recovered by the offended party
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
JUDGMENT
b. If acquitted
Promulgation of judgment
- By reading it in the presence of the accused and any judge of the court
it was rendered
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
RECONSIDERATION / NEW TRIAL
Grounds:
- Errors of law or irregularities prejudicial to the rights of the accused.
ex. The right to a speedy trial
- New and material evidence has been discovered which if introduced
and admitted would change the judgment .
THE THIRD PILLAR - COURT
APPEAL
- Any party may appeal from a judgment, unless the accused will be
placed in double jeopardy.
Where to:
1. To the RTC - in cases decided by MetroTC, MTC, MCTC
2. To the CA – in cases decided by the RTC
3. To the SC – IN cases decided by the CA
CORRECTION
HISTORY
SPANISH PERIOD
• During the Spanish regime an organized
corrective service was made operational.
• Old Bilibid prison in Oroquieta Street, Manila,
was established in 1847 pursuant to Section 1708
of the Revised Administrative Code. It was
formally opened by a Royal Decree in 1865.
• August 21, 1869, the San Ramon prison and penal
farm in Zamboanga City was established to
confine Muslim rebels and political prisoners
opposed to the Spanish rule.
ENGLISH PERIOD
• The Bureau of Prisons was created under the
Reorganization Act of 1905. (Act No. 1407
dated November 1, 1905) as an agency under
the Department of Commerce and Police. It
also paved the way for the re-establishment of
San Ramon Prison in 1907 which was
destroyed during the Spanish-American War.
On January 1, 1915, the San Ramon Prison
was placed under the auspices of the Bureau
of Prisons and started receiving prisoners from
Mindanao.
ENGLISH PERIOD
• 1904 the Luhit penal settlement (now Iwahig
Prison and Penal Farm) on a vast reservation of
28,072 hectares. It would reach an aggregate
total land area of 40,000 hectares in the late
1950s. It was located on the westernmost part of
the archipelago and far from the main town to
confine incorrigibles who the government had
found little hope of rehabilitation. The area was
expanded to 41,007 hectares by virtue of
Executive Order No. 67 issued by Governor
Newton Gilbert on October 15, 1912.
ENGLISH PERIOD
• On November 27, 1929, the Correctional
Institution for Women (CIW) was created
under Act No. 3579 while Davao Penal Colony
in Southern Mindanao was opened in 1932
under Act No. 3732. The CIW was founded to
provide separate facilities for women
offenders and to cater to their gender
difference. To date, it is the lone women’s
prison in the country.
ENGLISH PERIOD
• a. Undergoing investigation;
• b. Awaiting or undergoing trial; and
• c. Awaiting final judgment.
INMATES SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
-The following are the classifications of inmates according to security risk each
may pose:
a. High Profile Inmate - those who require increased security based on
intense media coverage or public concern as a result of their offense such
as but not limited to those who have been involved in a highly controversial
or sensationalized crime (SADISM, MUTILATION) or those who became
prominent for being a politician, government official, multi-million
entrepreneur, religious or cause-oriented group leader and movie or
television personality.
b. High Risk Inmate - those who are considered highly dangerous and who
require a greater degree of security, control and supervision because of
their deemed capability of escape, of being rescued, and their ability to
launch or spearhead acts of violence inside the jail. This includes those
charged with heinous crimes such as murder, kidnapping for ransom,
economic sabotage (profiteering -the act or activity of making an
unreasonable profit on the sale of essential goods especially during times
of emergency), syndicated or organized crimes, etc. Also included are
inmates with military or police trainings or those whose life is in danger or
under imminent threat.
c. High Value Target (HVT) - a target, either a
resource or a person, who may either be an enemy
combatant, high ranking official or a civilian in
danger of capture or death, typically in possession
of critical intelligence, data, or authority marked as
an objective for a mission and which a commander
requires for the successful completion of the same.
d. Security Threat Group - any formal or informal
ongoing inmates’ group, gang, organization or
association consisting of three or more members
falling into one of the following basic categories:
street gangs, prison gangs, outlaw gangs, traditional
organized crime, aboriginal gangs, subversive
groups and terrorist organizations.
e. Subversive Group - a group of persons that
adopts or advocates subversive principles or
policies tending to overthrow or undermine an
established government.
f. Terrorist Group –politically motivated , causes
fear, identified targets, international/domestic.
g. Violent Extremist Offender (VEO) - a person whose political
or religious ideologies are considered far outside the
mainstream attitudes of the society or who violates common
moral standards and who has adopted an increasingly extreme
ideals and aspirations resorting to the employment of violence
in the furtherance of his/her beliefs.
h. Medium Risk Inmates -those who represent a moderate risk
to the public and staff. These inmates still require greater
security, control and supervision as they might escape from
and might commit violence inside the jail.
i. Minimum Risk Inmates (Ordinary Inmates) - those inmates
who have lesser tendencies to commit offenses and generally
pose the least risk to public safety. In most cases, they may be
first time offenders and are charged with light offenses.
Bureau of Corrections (BuCor)
Conciliation
A form of mediation where the Pangkat na Tagapagkasundo assists
the parties in formulating their own agreement in a face-to-face meeting.
Arbitration
A face-to-face dispute resolution process whereby the Punong
Barangay or the Pangkat na Tagapagkasundo, acting as an arbitrator makes
a decision based on the facts presented by 2 parties.
Organizational Structure of the
Lupons
Lupong Tagapamayapa (Lupon)
• This is composed of ten (10) to twenty (20) people.
• Exercises administrative supervision over the conciliation
panels provided under the law.
• Meets regularly once a month to provide a forum for
exchange of ideas among its members and the public on
matters relevant to amicable settlement disputes, and to
enable various conciliation panel members to share with
one another their observations and experiences in effecting
speedy resolution of disputes.
• Exercises such other powers and perform such other duties
and functions as may be prescribed by law or ordinance.
Organizational Structure of the
Lupons
Pangkat na Tagapagkasundo
• In each lupon (committee) there is a
Conciliation Body (Pangkat Tagapagkasundo),
• This is composed of a panel of 3 mediators.
• the main function of which is to bring
opposing parties together and effect amicable
settlement of differences. The committee…
The lupon of each Barangay has jurisdiction to
amicably settle all disputes betweean parties
residing in the same city or municipality: Except;