Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper Personal TL India
Paper Personal TL India
Paper Personal TL India
ABSTRACT
In this multifaceted world, employee demographics have emerged as an important consideration for human
resource manager due to diverse nature of work force. Demographics characteristics are gaining importance in
making strategic human resource policies and practices in the organization. This study is an attempt to investigate
the role of employee demographics in the application of human resource (HR) practices in Metro Rail service
sector organizations in India. Independent sample t-test was applied as an analytical tool. Findings indicate that
there is significant impact of demographics variables (age, experience and grade) in employees’ attitude towards
selective human resource practices. Based on the findings, this study tries to provide an understanding on the
influence of demographics characteristics towards the importance and application of HR practices and discusses
how the differences in demographics can be utilized in the organization towards effectiveness of human resource
management.
Keywords: Employee demographics, Human resource, Human resource practices, Work environment, Workforce
diversity
* Assistant Professor, Dept. of Management (MBA), G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering and Management, Domkhel road,
Raisoni College Rd, Pune, Maharashtra
G.l. Bajaj Institute of Management and Research Optimization: Journal of Research in Management
7.1 Sample and Sampling Technique questionnaires in the range of 30-500 are acceptable
The respondents in the study were employees of (Sekaran, 2003). Non probability sampling is adopted
Metro Rail organizations which are in operation for for collection of data because it is very convenient,
public services in India. 300 survey questionnaires economical, less time consuming and provides easy
were dispersed, out of which 209 reactions were and speedily data from the respondents as compared
recorded. The response rate was about 69%, which to probability sampling (Malhotra, 2007). Moreover,
was quite acceptable in social science. Out of the the sample units of this research study were chosen
received response, eight were rejected due to on the ground of convenience because the target
incomplete information. In social sciences research, respondents were willing to provide information.
The respondent’s profile is shown in Table 1.
Table-1 : Demographic profile of Respondent % (N=209)
Age Group (in years) Grade Department Total Experience (in years)
Category % Category % Category % Category %
Below 31 28.5 Executive 28.6 Operation 62.3 Below 06 27.3
31 – 40 48.1 Maintenance 37.7 06 – 10 42.8
41 – 50 16.9 Non-execu- 11 – 15 13
71.4
tive Other 0 16 – 20 6.5
Above 50 6.5
Above 20 10.4
Source: Author
7.2 Measurement and Instrumentation • Career Development
In this study, four demographic variables are • Performance Appraisal
examined – age group, grade, department and total • Compensation and Benefit
experience. The broad categories of demographic • Reward and Recognition
research usually cited these variables much significant • Work Environment
in contextual environment. Seven functional areas These seven HRM domains are selected as they are
were selected to assess employee’s attitude towards listed in HRM high performance models, that are
the application of HRM practices: summarized with the number of scales and literature
• Recruitment and Selection references in Table 2.
• Training
Table – 2: HR Practices – No. of Scale / Statement and Literature References
HR Practices (Construct/ No. of Scale /
Literature Reference
Variable) Statement
Recruitment and Edgar and Geare (2005), Sun, Aryee, and Law (2007), Chew and Chan (2008),
05
Selection Taylor, Levy, Boyacigiller, and Beechler (2008), Williams and Mohamed (2010)
Edgar and Geare (2005), Sun et al. (2007), Chew and Chan (2008), Taylor et al.
Training 04 (2008), Williams and Mohamed (2010), Hong, Hao, Kumar, Ramedran, and
Kadiresan (2012)
Sturges, Guest, and Davey (2000), Edgar and Geare (2005), Chew and Chan
Career Development 03
(2008), Taylor et al. (2008), Williams and Mohamed (2010), Hong et al. (2012)
Sun et al. (2007), Chew and Chan (2008), Whiting, Kline, and Sulsky (2008),
Performance Appraisal 05
Williams and Mohamed (2010), Hong et al. (2012)
Compensation and
05 Chew and Chan (2008), Williams and Mohamed (2010), Hong et al. (2012)
Benefit
Reward and Recognition 04 Sun et al. (2007), Chew and Chan (2008), Taylor et al. (2008)
Work Environment 05 Sun et al. (2007), Edgar and Geare (2005)
Source: Author
Table – 4: Application of HR Practices by Age Group, Grade, Department and Total Experience
Age Group Grade Department Total Experience
Construct Result 10
(Variable) – HR Below Above Non-Execu- Maintenance Above
Executive Operation Yrs or
Practice 31 Yrs 31 Yrs tive and Other 10 Yrs
below
N 22 55 22 55 48 29 54 23
Mean 2.25 2.11 1.76 2.30 2.04 2.34 2.24 1.93
Training F 0.15 8.53 9.69 0.17
P .417 .000* .101 .072
As shown in Table 4, thirteen analyses had significant was associated with statistically significant effect
differences between means. The statistical analysis for performance appraisal t(75) = 2.54, p = .013
and results of demographic variables associated and work environment t(75) = 2.06, p = .043;
with HR practices are summarized as below. and was not associated with training t(75)=.82,
• Age Group p=.417, career development t(75)=1.71, p=.091;
The younger employees (i.e., below 31 years) compensation and benefit t(75)=1.90, p=.062;and
were associated with training M=2.25 (SD= reward and recognition t(75)=1.14, p=.256. Thus,
.61), career development M=3.00 (SD=.88), the attitudinal differences exist towards the
performance appraisal M=2.57 (SD=.69), application of selective HR practices across the
compensation and benefit M=2.88 (SD=.84), age groups.
reward and recognition M=2.56 (SD=.60), work • Grade
environment M=2.78 (SD=.94). By comparison, The non-executive employees were associated
the elder employees (i.e., above 31 years) were with training M = 2.30 (SD = .72), career
associated with a numerically smaller training M development M = 2.92 (SD = .88), performance
= 2.11 (SD = .71), career development M = 2.62 appraisal M = 2.44 (SD = .59), compensation and
(SD = .88), performance appraisal M = 2.19 (SD benefit M = 2.83 (SD = .67), reward and recognition
= .59), compensation and benefit M = 2.53 (SD = M = 2.56 (SD = .63), work environment M = 2.67
.68), reward and recognition M = 2.36 (SD = .70), (SD = .84). By comparison, executive employees
work environment value M = 2.35 (SD = .78). were associated with a numerically smaller
Levene’s F-test was used for testing assumption training M = 1.76 (SD = .34), career development
of homogeneity of variances and found satisfied M = 2.24 (SD = .74), performance appraisal M =
for training F(75)=.15, p=.696; career development 1.95 (SD = .56), compensation and benefit M =
F(75)=.02, p=.882; performance appraisal 2.14 (SD = .68), reward and recognition M = 2.07
F(75)=2.55, p=.114; compensation and benefit (SD = .65), work environment value M = 1.98
F(75) = 2.80, p = .099; reward and recognition (SD = .65). Levene’s F-test was used for testing
F(75)=.56, p=.457; and work environment assumption of homogeneity of variances and
F(75)=.54, p=.466.The independent samples t-test found satisfied for career development F(75) =
the non-executive employees perceive training, 3. Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., “High performance
career development, reward and recognition, work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of
compensation and benefit, performance appraisal research and managerial implications”, Research in
personnel and human resource management, Vol. 16, pp.
and work environment practices to be substantially
53-101, 1998. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.
better placed as compared to executive grade edu/index
employees. Furthermore, employees having total
4. Bowen, D. E., Ostroff, C, “Understanding HRM–firm
work experiences of 10 years or below perceives performance linkages: The role of the ‘strength’ of
career development, reward and recognition, the HRM system”, Academy of management review,
compensation and benefit, performance appraisal Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 203-221, 2004. doi: 10.5465/
and work environment practices to be substantially AMR.2004.12736076
better placed than what was experienced by the 5. Chew, J., Chan, C. C., “Human resource practices,
employees having total work experiences above 10 organizational commitment and intention to stay”,
years. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp.
503-522., 2008. doi: 10.1108/01437720810904194
Thus, the research finding highlight attitudinal
6. Cox, T. H., Blake, S., “Managing cultural diversity:
differences towards the application of many HR
Implications for organizational competitiveness”,
practices, which conforms to Pfeffer’s (1985) finding The Executive, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 45-56, 1991. Retrieved
of crucial role that demography plays in area of HR from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4165021
research. HR professionals can be benefited with the 7. Decenzo, D. A., Robbins, S. P., Human resource
study of employee demographics and its linkage management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1999.
with employee’s behaviour and approach towards 8. De Cieri, H., Kramar, R., Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck,
jobs and organization. Demographic attributes have J., Gerhart, B., Wright, P. (2008), Human Resource
the potential to anticipate traits for employee attitude Management in Australia. Strategy/People/Performance,
(Pfeffer 1985; Stewman, 1988). In the process of 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Irwin, Sydney.
designing and developing HR policies and practices 9. Delaney, J. T., Huselid, M. A., “The impact of human
in the organization, employee demographics should resource management practices on perceptions of
be considered as an integral part of HR policies and organizational performance”, Academy of Management
practices Journal, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 949-969, 1996. doi:
10.2307/256718
11. LIMITATION OF STUDY 10. Dessler, G. (2007). Human Resource Management. (11th
The present study has some limitations. Further ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
study on employee demographics should include 11. Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., “The relational view: cooperative
other variables like gender, marital status, employee strategy and sources of inter organizational
seniority, etc. along with other HR practices like competitive advantage”, Academy of management
review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 660-679, 1998.
employee participation, communication and job
design to name a few. The study was limited to few 12. Edgar, F., Geare, A., “Employee demographics in
human resource management research”, Research and
Metro Rail service sector organizations with smaller
Practice in Human Resource Management, Vol. 12 No. 1,
sample size. Future study should span over several pp. 61-91, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.rphrm.
Metro Rail service sector organizations with bigger curtin.edu.au/index.html
sample size. 13. Gibb, S., “The state of human resource management:
REFERENCES Evidence from employees’ views of HRM systems
and staff”, Employee Relations, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 318-
1. ACIB (Australian Centre for International Business) 336, 2001. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000005685
(2000). The International Business Case for Diversity
Management. Program for The Practice of Diversity 14. Gould-Williams, J., Mohamed, R. B., “A comparative
Management, Department of Immigration and study of the effects of ‘best practice’ HRM on
Multicultural Affairs in Cooperation with the worker outcomes in Malaysia and England local
Australian Center for International Business. government”, The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 653-675, 2010.
2. Armstrong, M., and Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s doi: 10.1080/09585191003658821
handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan
Page Publishers.
15. Greenhaus, J. H. (1987). Career Management. Chicago: 28. Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2008). Human Resource
Dryden. Management. (12th Ed.). Cengage Learning.
16. Guest, D. E., “Human resource management – the 29. Milkovich, G. T. & Newman, J. M. (1996). Compensation
worker’s verdict”, Human Resource Management (5th ed.), Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Journal, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 5-25, 1999. doi: 10.1111/ 30. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods:
j.1748-8583.1999.tb00200.x Qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York:
17. Guest, D. E., “Human resource management: When Pearson Education Inc.
research confronts theory”, International Journal of 31. Ngo, H. Y., Turban, D., Lau, C. M., & Lui, S.
Human Resource Management, Vol. 12 No. 7, pp. 1092- Y. (1998). Human resource practices and firm
1106, 2001. doi: 10.1080/09585190110067837 performance of multinational corporations:
18. Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee influences of country origin. International Journal
reactions to job characteristics. Journal of applied of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 632-652. doi:
psychology, 55(3), 259-286. doi: 10.1037/h0031152 10.1080/095851998340937
19. Hong, E. N. C., Hao, L. Z., Kumar, R., Ramedran, 32. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric
C., & Kadiresan, V. (2012). An effectiveness of theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
human resource management practices on employee 33. Paul, A. K., & Anantharaman, R. N. (2003). Impact
retention in institute of higher learning: A regression of people management practices on organizational
analysis. International Journal of Business Research performance: analysis of a causal model. International
and Management, 3(2), 60-79. Retrieved from http:// Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(7), 1246-
www.cscjournals.org 1266. doi: 10.1080/0958519032000145648
20. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human 34. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In
resource management practices on turnover, L. L. Cummings & B. M Staw (Ed.), Research in
productivity, and corporate financial performance. organizational behavior (Vol 2, 299-357). Greenwich,
Academy of management journal, 38(3), 635-672. doi: C.T: JAI Press.
10.2307/256741
35. Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizational demography:
21. Kossek, E. E., Lobel, S. A., & Brown, J. (2005). Human Implications for management. California Management
resource strategies to manage workforce diversity. Review, 28(1), 67-81.
Handbook of workplace diversity, 54-74.
36. Reio Jr, T. G., & Callahan, J. L. (2004). Affect, curiosity,
22. Kumar, R., & Sia, S. K. (2012). Employee Engagement and socialization-related learning: A path analysis of
Explicating the Contribution of Work Environment. antecedents to job performance. Journal of Business
Management and Labour Studies, 37(1), 31-43. doi: and Psychology, 19(1), 3-22.
10.1177/0258042X1103700104
37. Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L., &
23. Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really robust? Reinvestigating
demography. Organization Science, 8(1), 1-22. doi: the robustness of ANOVA against violations of
10.1287/orsc.8.1.1 the normal distribution assumption. Methodology:
24. Lee, F. H., & Lee, F. Z. (2007). The relationships European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral
between HRM practices, Leadership style, and Social Sciences, 6(4), 147-151. doi: 10.1027/1614-
competitive strategy and business performance 2241/a000016
in Taiwanese steel industry. In Proceedings of the 38. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business:
13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Melbourne, A skill building approach (4th ed.). New Jersey: John
Australia (pp. 953-971). Wiley and Sons, Inc.
25. Leibowitz, Z.B., Farren, C., & Kaye, B.L. (1988). 39. Shen, J., Chanda, A., D’Netto, B., & Monga, M.
Designing career development systems. (1st ed.). San (2009). Managing diversity through human resource
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. management: an international perspective and
26. Mahmood, M. M. H. (2004). Institutional Context conceptual framework. The International Journal of
of Human Resource Management: Case Studies of Human Resource Management, 20(2), 235-251. doi:
Multinational Subsidiaries in Bangladesh (Doctoral 10.1080/09585190802670516
dissertation). 40. Shub, A. N., & Stonebraker, P. W. (2009). The human
27. Malhotra, N. K. (2007). Marketing Research. An applied impact on supply chains: evaluating the importance
Orientation, Pearson. Upper Saddle River. of “soft” areas on integration and performance.
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,
14(1), 31-40. doi: 10.1108/13598540910927287
41. Singh, K. (2004). Impact of HR practices on 46. Thompson, N. (1997). Anti Discriminatory Practice.
perceived firm performance in India. Asia Pacific Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 301-317. doi: 47. Whiting, H. J., Kline, T. J., & Sulsky, L. M. (2008).
10.1177/1038411104048170 The performance appraisal congruency scale: an
42. Stewman, S. (1988). Organizational demography. assessment of person-environment fit. International
Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 173-202. Retrieved Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,
from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083315 57(3), 223-236. doi: 10.1108/17410400810857239
43. Sturges, J., Guest, D., & Mac Davey, K. (2000). Who’s 48. Wright, P. M., & Kehoe, R. R. (2008). Human resource
in charge? Graduates’ attitudes to and experiences practices and organizational commitment: A deeper
of career management and their relationship with examination. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,
organizational commitment. European Journal of 46(1), 6-20. doi: 10.1177/1038411107086540
Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 351-370. doi: 49. Yeung, A. K., & Berman, B. (1997). Adding value
10.1080/135943200417966 through human resources: reorienting human
44. Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High- resource measurement to drive business performance.
performance human resource practices, citizenship Human Resource Management, 36 (3), 321–335. doi:
behavior, and organizational performance: A 10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199723)36:3<321::AID-
relational perspective. Academy of Management HRM4>3.0.CO;2-Y
Journal, 50(3), 558-577. Retrieved from http://www.
jstor.org/stable/20159873
45. Taylor, S., Levy, O., Boyacigiller, N. A., & Beechler,
S. (2008). Employee commitment in MNCs:
Impacts of organizational culture, HRM and top
management orientations. The International Journal
of Human Resource Management, 19(4), 501-527. doi:
10.1080/09585190801953491